Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 评测 - 大型日常 MacBook 的升级版Apple

快速而昂贵。 在 MacBook Air 15 推出约 8 个月后，Apple ，更新了其大型日常 MacBook，由于采用了新的 M3 处理器，其性能比以前更好。此外，Wi-Fi 性能也有所提升。不过，价格依然居高不下。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/12/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Apple Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Thunderbolt

去年年中，Apple ，推出了更大尺寸的 MacBook Air 15，与我们的预期完全一致：更大的 MacBook Air 拥有更大的屏幕空间，由于采用了相同的被动散热技术，性能也不相上下。现在，这款大屏幕 Air 首次升级到新的 M3 处理器，并安装了新的 Wi-Fi 模块，但除此之外，它几乎和原来一样。

Apple 入门级机型配备 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 固态硬盘，售价高达 1299 美元。现在又多了一款预配置机型（我们的评测设备），配备 16GB 内存和 512GB SSD，售价 1699 美元。这样做的好处是，在许多商店里，预配置机型的价格往往会降低。

Test device courtesy of Apple Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3

Processor

Apple M3 8 x 2.7 - 4.1 GHz, 21 W PL2 / Short Burst, 12 W PL1 / Sustained

Graphics adapter

Apple M3 10-Core GPU, 15 W TDP

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5 6400, dual-channel, onboard

Display

15.60 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1664 pixel, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

Apple SSD AP0512Z, 512 GB

, 465 GB free

Connections

2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 11.5 x 340.4 x 237.6

Battery

66.5 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Apple macOS 14 Sonoma

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Six speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, 35W PSU dual USB-C, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.501 kg, Power Supply: 184 g

Price

2059 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
91.6 %	03/2024	Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU	1.5 kg	11.5 mm	15.60"	2880x1664
84.9 %	02/2024	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.6 kg	19 mm	15.60"	2880x1620
88.1 %	12/2023	MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.6 kg	19.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.6 %	06/2023	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.6 kg	19 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
86 %	06/2023	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2 kg	17.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1680
85 %	08/2023	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	990 g	10.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
80.7 %	06/2023	Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.5 kg	15.4 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

外壳 - Midnight MacBook 现在配备了全新涂层

说到 MacBook Air 15 的设计和外壳质量，基本上没有什么变化。与前代产品一样，这款更大的 Air 比 MBA 13 更薄，这也是为什么该设备的重量（1.5 千克）在你第一次拿起它时会让你大吃一惊的原因。在实际使用中，由于底座太平，坚硬的前边缘不会给手腕带来不适。制造质量依然出色，稳定性也是如此。最大开启角度为 135 度。

Apple 在颜色方面，我们依然采用了我们熟悉的四种颜色（银色、太空灰、北极星和午夜）。深蓝色的 "午夜 "款在产品照片上看起来特别漂亮，但很快就暴露出它是一个指纹磁铁，很难保持表面清洁。新的 M3 机型（午夜版）采用了与黑色 MacBook Pro 14/16 相同的阳极氧化涂层。这有助于减少指纹问题，这也是我们在新款 MacBook Air 13.不过，我们的极地之星评测样机等轻薄版本在这方面更具优势。

Air 15 的重量仅为 1.5 千克，仅次于 LG Gram(990克），但Apple 的笔记本电脑在一定程度上是最薄的设备。35 瓦的电源适配器又带来了 184 克的重量。

尺寸比较

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Huawei MateBook 16s i9 LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 DIN A4 ❌

我们又拍摄了一些新款三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 的对比照片（我们的评测将很快发布），它是目前 M3 MacBook Air 15 的竞争对手之一。Galaxy Book4 的 16 英寸 OLED 屏幕稍大一些，但直接对比不难发现，由于屏幕底部边框较厚，浪费了大量空间。这也使三星笔记本电脑的机身明显更深；此外，它的底座也比Apple 的要厚得多。

功能 - 现在您可以控制两个显示屏

端口方面没有变化。除了电源适配器的 MagSafe 接口外，左侧仍有两个 USB-C 端口（4.0），仍然只支持 Thunderbolt 3。右侧只有 3.5 毫米音频接口，我们希望能看到另一个 USB 端口。15 英寸机型的闲置空间更为明显。

不过，有一项新功能。到目前为止 MacBook Air 15 M2除了内置面板外，只能控制一个外接显示器。M3 SoC 的硬件要求相同，这意味着它只能控制两台显示器，但当显示器盖子关闭时，现在可以使用两台外接显示器（1 台最高 6K/60 Hz，1 台最高 5K/60 Hz）。当然，这还不够完美，但绝对是一个进步，如果你想使用两台显示器，它可以让你的使用体验完全不同。

我们用 MBA 13 和两台外接显示器（一台通过 USB-C，一台通过 USB-C/HDMI 适配器）试用了这项新功能，效果非常好。我们使用 MacBook Pro 14 M3也将在未来某个时候通过软件更新获得这一功能。

交流

Apple 更新了 Wi-Fi 模块，现在它支持频率为 160 MHz 的 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。与我们的华硕参考路由器搭配使用，效果立竿见影，因为新款 MacBook Air M3 现在的速度是前代产品的两倍。速度的两倍与更大的 MacBook Pro 机型不相上下。

Networking
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1698 (min: 1601) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1756 (min: 1717) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	954 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	911 (min: 468) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1274 (min: 787) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1391 (min: 670) MBit/s ∼90%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1144 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1317 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1210 (min: 747) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1111 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼72%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1459 (min: 796) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1553 (min: 1528) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1583 (min: 1034) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1337 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼86%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1498 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1476 (min: 1300) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1442 (min: 1087) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1539 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼99%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1551 (min: 796) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1580 (min: 1553) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1580 (min: 1112) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1551 (min: 1516) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1649 (min: 1353) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1720 (min: 1676) MBit/s ∼98%

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1698 (1601-1722)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1756 (1717-1808)

网络摄像头

在光线充足的情况下，1080p 网络摄像头仍能拍摄出不错的照片，麦克风也没有任何问题。您还可以选择将 iPhone 用作网络摄像头。

ColorChecker Apple MacBook Air 15 M3: 11.86 ∆E min: 3.18 - max: 22.95 ∆E

维护

与之前的情况一样，只要使用合适的十字螺丝刀，就可以卸下机箱下盖。不过，由于没有风扇，而且所有元件都是焊接的，所以最终还是可以省去拆卸的麻烦。如果需要，可以更换粘合的电池，但这有点麻烦，只能由合格的维修人员来完成。

输入设备 - 出色的触控板

与 MacBook Air M2 相比，输入设备没有任何变化。键盘的质量虽然没有达到高级商务笔记本电脑的水平，但总的来说，键盘输入准确，输入舒适。Touch ID 指纹扫描仪的工作仍然无可挑剔，而且多年来，Apple ，由于其多级亮度设置和自动适应环境光线的能力，在白色键盘背光方面一直是值得追赶的公司。

大尺寸触控板仍然是移动领域的典范，它与 macOS 的集成也非常出色。有了 Force Touch，点击在任何地方都是一样的，声音也不会太大，此外，手势操作也实现得非常完美。与往常一样，MacBook Air 没有配备触摸屏。

显示屏 - P3 覆盖的 IPS

对于 Air，Apple 仍然选择使用 15.6 英寸 IPS 屏幕。分辨率为 2,880 x 1,864 像素，有点奇怪。额外的 64 个垂直像素用于凹槽旁边的区域。这看起来仍然不是特别好，但并没有侵蚀 16:10 面板的实际空间。

该面板的主观画质依然非常出色。色彩鲜艳，内容清晰，macOS 也依然没有出现缩放问题。不过，在刷新率方面，我们希望能升级到 120 Hz，因为我们使用的仍然是 60 Hz 的面板。响应时间并不突出，在日常使用中也不会出现重影现象。没有 PWM，屏幕亮度和色温都能自动适应环境光线。

我们在显示屏中部测得的最大亮度为 525 cd/m²，平均亮度略高于 500 cd/m²。然而，0.37 cd/m² 的黑色值非常高，这就是为什么与 OLED 或微型 LED 面板相比，暗色内容永远不会呈现全黑的原因。对比度为 1.400:1。与 MacBook Air 13 不同的是，较大的 Air 15 并不存在漏光问题。


490 cd/m²	493 cd/m²	487 cd/m²
509 cd/m²	526 cd/m²	516 cd/m²
505 cd/m²	527 cd/m²	504 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 527 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 506.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 525 cd/m²
Contrast: 1422:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6"	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"	MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16"	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Samsung ATNA56YX08-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U BOE 18 NE156FHM-NS0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		3%	-2%	5%	-22%	4%	-47%
Display P3 Coverage	98.7	99.93 1%	96.7 -2%	99.91 1%	63 -36%	99.8 1%	43.17 -56%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	100 0%	99.8 0%	100 0%	94.9 -5%	100 0%	65.03 -35%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	87.8	95.52 9%	84.6 -4%	98.87 13%	65.1 -26%	98.09 12%	44.6 -49%
Response Times		91%	-79%	91%	-3%	91%	36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	35.3 ?(16.4, 17.9)	2 ?(1, 1) 94%	49.4 ?(22.6, 26.8) -40%	2 ?(1, 1) 94%	34 ?(16, 18) 4%	2 ?(1, 1) 94%	20 ?(3, 17) 43%
Response Time Black / White *	15.6 ?(5.2, 10.4)	2 ?(1, 1) 87%	33.9 ?(15.6, 18.3) -117%	2 ?(1, 1) 87%	17 ?(7, 10) -9%	2 ?(1, 1) 87%	11 ?(2, 9) 29%
PWM Frequency		240		227 ?(50)	26 ?(10)
Screen		81%	-99%	-92%	-23%	-70%	-188%
Brightness middle	526	370.4 -30%	473.6 -10%	370 -30%	448 -15%	395 -25%	308 -41%
Brightness	506	376 -26%	456 -10%	371 -27%	436 -14%	392 -23%	290 -43%
Brightness Distribution	92	96 4%	87 -5%	98 7%	93 1%	97 5%	83 -10%
Black Level *	0.37	0.02 95%	0.19 49%		0.35 5%	0.1 73%	0.425 -15%
Contrast	1422	18520 1202%	2493 75%		1280 -10%	3950 178%	725 -49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.4	1.51 -8%	5.9 -321%	2.77 -98%	1.6 -14%	2.2 -57%	5.27 -276%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2	2.89 -45%	9.37 -369%	4.08 -104%	4.44 -122%	4.43 -122%	16.43 -722%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.6	3.36 -460%	0.89 -48%	2.83 -372%	0.64 -7%	4.65 -675%	2.58 -330%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	2.1 -0%	7.3 -248%	2.58 -23%	2.78 -32%	1.78 15%	6.38 -204%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	1.9 ^116%	2.46 ^89%		2.39 ^92%	2.4 ^92%
CCT	6865 ^95%	6536 ^99%	7260 ^90%	6241 ^104%	6582 ^99%	6284 ^103%	7784 ^84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)					2.43
Total Average (Program / Settings)		58% / 66%	-60% / -75%	1% / -38%	-16% / -20%	8% / -31%	-66% / -126%

* ... smaller is better

开箱后，面板的校准效果不错，灰度和色彩的 DeltaE 2000 偏差（与 P3 参考值相比）均低于 3。较小的模型我们的专业 CalMAN 软件分析（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）记录了轻微的蓝色色调和接近过冷的冷色温。通过校准（上面有免费下载的配置文件），我们控制住了这两种情况，偏差也明显降低。不过，最大亮度降低了约 20 cd/m²。完全覆盖 P3 色彩空间。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
35.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17204 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

虽然 Macbook Air 的显示屏是亮面的，但它不像大多数配备 OLED 面板或触摸屏的 Windows 笔记本电脑那样反光。这意味着，只要阳光不直接照射到屏幕上，你仍然可以在明亮的环境中顺利工作。可视角度稳定性非常好。

性能 - Air 15 始终配备速度更快的 M3 SoC

与较小的 MacBook Air 13 不同，15 英寸机型只提供 M3 SoC 及其更快的 10 核图形处理器。此外，你还可以选择 8、16 或 24 GB 的焊接内存和最大容量为 2 TB 的固态硬盘。电源适配器（35 瓦或 70 瓦）的选择不会影响 MacBook Air M3 的性能。

Prozessor -Apple M3 in 3 nm

M3 SoC Apple M3 SoC是Apple 首款采用 3 纳米工艺制造的芯片。其内核配置与旧的 M2 SoC但由于改进了制造工艺，Apple 能够在不大幅增加功耗的情况下提高时钟频率。现在，四个性能内核的最高主频为 4.056 GHz（或当所有内核都处于紧张状态时约为 3.6 GHz），而四个效率内核的最高主频为 2.748 GHz。在多核测试中，处理器的功耗短暂达到约 21 瓦，然后下降并最终稳定在约 12 瓦（R23 多核：9085 点意味着减少约 12%）。这使得性能下降幅度低于 MacBook Air 13。在简短测试中，性能与 MacBook Pro 14 M3当然，由于采用了主动散热技术，性能保持稳定。

与旧版 M2 SoC 相比，性能平均提高了约 20%。结果是，在多核测试中，M3 SoC 的速度普遍低于其 16 英寸竞争对手，CPU 的功耗是后者的四倍。

在单核测试中，Apple ，性能比 M2 提高了 20%，从而缩小了与英特尔和 AMD 的差距。只有部分酷睿 i9 CPU 仍有优势。这些都是令人印象深刻的结果，尤其是考虑到 5 瓦多一点的低单核功耗。在我们的分析文章中，我们已经对 M3 SoC 的效率进行了分析。分析文章中.在电池模式下，MacBook Air 15 M3 的 CPU 性能保持稳定。其他 CPU 基准测试这里.

Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	17754 Points +72%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	15591 Points +51%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	15106 Points +47%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15013 (14365.6^min - 15012.9^max) Points +46%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	14787 Points +44%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	14099 Points +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	13315 Points +29%
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=60, last 2 years)	11836 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	10298 Points
Average Apple M3 (10074 - 10454, n=3)	10275 Points 0%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	9494 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U	8915 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	8569 Points -17%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	2037 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	1977 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	1942 Points +2%
Average Apple M3 (1900 - 1904, n=3)	1901 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	1900 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	1891 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	1772 Points -7%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	1760 Points -7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1749 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U	1685 Points -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=60, last 2 years)	1662 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	1647 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	1589 Points -16%

Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	15480 Points +28%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	14412 Points +19%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12727 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	12611 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	12066 Points
Average Apple M3 (11863 - 12066, n=5)	11984 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 15220, n=52, last 2 years)	11696 Points -3%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	11402 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	10093 Points -16%

Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	3138 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	3130 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	3113 Points -1%
Average Apple M3 (3026 - 3130, n=5)	3077 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	2716 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	2593 Points -17%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	2564 Points -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3130, n=47, last 2 years)	2486 Points -21%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2418 Points -23%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	15298 Points +45%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	14859 Points +41%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	13768 Points +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	13312 Points +26%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12499 Points +18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	11831 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	11817 Points +12%
Average Apple M3 (10570 - 10774, n=3)	10697 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	10570 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=56, last 2 years)	10175 Points -4%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	9967 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	8961 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U	8044 Points -24%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	2350 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	2331 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	2327 Points -1%
Average Apple M3 (2256 - 2350, n=3)	2316 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	2003 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	1961 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	1949 Points -17%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	1917 Points -18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	1861 Points -21%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P	1830 Points -22%
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=56, last 2 years)	1770 Points -25%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1749 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U	1672 Points -29%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	1059 Points +77%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	908 Points +52%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	848 Points +42%
Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1162, n=42, last 2 years)	671 Points +12%
Average Apple M3 (576 - 712, n=4)	622 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	598 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	513 Points -14%

Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	144 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	143 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3	142 Points
Average Apple M3 (140 - 142, n=4)	141 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2	121 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 142, n=25, last 2 years)	105.9 Points -25%

系统性能

在日常使用中，旧款 MacBook Air 15 M2已经是一款速度极快的设备，M3 SoC 也是如此。最重要的是，在本地应用程序中，它的性能非常出色，而在合成基准测试中，新款 MacBook Air 15 M3 几乎总是领先于 Windows 竞争产品。

基于英特尔处理器的 Mac 应用程序可以通过 Rosetta 2 进行模拟，效果非常好。虽然在速度上存在差异（尤其是在复杂的应用程序上），但运行起来同样完美无瑕。人工智能是当前非常热门的话题，而Apple 也在其神经引擎中安装了 NPU，自 M1 芯片并将其用于信息中的单词预测。喜欢使用包括 Copilot 在内的微软办公套件的用户不必担心这个问题，因为该功能是通过云提供的，这意味着与 Windows 设备没有区别。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Jetstream 2: Total Score

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2146 Points +16%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1868 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z	1857 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1847 - 1857, n=3)	1850 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1811 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1769 Points -5%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1670 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=55, last 2 years)	1575 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1	1450 Points -22%

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2064 Points +19%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1787 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z	1728 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1716 - 1729, n=3)	1724 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1722 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1693 Points -2%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1634 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=55, last 2 years)	1520 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1	1428 (1479^min - 1268^max) Points -17%

CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2224 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z	2210 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (2183 - 2210, n=3)	2197 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2041 Points -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2009 Points -9%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1928 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=55, last 2 years)	1722 Points -22%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1708 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1	1528 Points -31%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2171 Points +59%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1715 Points +25%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1666 Points +22%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1556 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1474 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z	1367 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1364 - 1367, n=3)	1366 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=55, last 2 years)	1352 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1	1299 Points -5%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z	448 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (423 - 448, n=3)	439 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	339 Points -24%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	321 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 448, n=56, last 2 years)	304 Points -32%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	303 Points -32%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	299 Points -33%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	263 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1	254 Points -43%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z	315 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (313 - 315, n=2)	314 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	295 Points -6%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	271 Points -14%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	263 Points -17%
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 325, n=53, last 2 years)	254 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1	230 Points -27%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	228 Points -28%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1	562 ms * -55%
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1104, n=61, last 2 years)	530 ms * -46%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	525 ms * -45%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	502 ms * -38%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	498 ms * -37%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	491 ms * -35%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	456 ms * -26%
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (363 - 373, n=3)	366 ms * -1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z	363.1 ms *

Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z	317.5 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (305 - 318, n=3)	313 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (117 - 478, n=38, last 2 years)	290 Points -9%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	258.579 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1	235.539 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

与 Pro 机型不同，Apple 的 Air 采用了 PCIe 3.0 固态硬盘。我们的评测设备安装了 512 GB 版本（AP0512Z），其传输速度达到了预期水平，最高可达 3.5 GB/s。在日常使用中，这意味着没有任何限制。同样，我们预计 256 GB 型号的性能会大大降低（约 50%），我们将尽快对其进行检查。首次启动后，用户有 465 GB 的可用空间。Air M3 可配置最大容量为 2 TB 的固态硬盘。其他固态硬盘基准测试这里.

Drive Performance Rating | Blackmagic Disk Speed Test

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple SSD AP2048Z	100 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple SSD AP0512Z	77.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple SSD AP0512Z	76.1 pt
Average Apple SSD AP0512Z	59.4 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple SSD AP0512Z	52.7 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	51.4 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Apple SSD AP1024Z	50.3 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple SSD AP1024Z	49 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Z	26.7 pt

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple SSD AP2048Z	5359.8 MB/s +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple SSD AP0512Z	4756.4 MB/s +61%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple SSD AP0512Z	4645.3 MB/s +58%
Average Apple SSD AP0512Z (2896 - 4756, n=7)	3422 MB/s +16%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple SSD AP0512Z	2947.8 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (2848 - 2948, n=3, last 2 years)	2900 MB/s -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Apple SSD AP1024Z	2876.6 MB/s -2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple SSD AP1024Z	2847.5 MB/s -3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Z	1475.8 MB/s -50%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple SSD AP2048Z	6388.9 MB/s +99%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple SSD AP0512Z	4198.7 MB/s +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple SSD AP0512Z	4192.9 MB/s +30%
Average Apple SSD AP0512Z (3123 - 4199, n=7)	3517 MB/s +9%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple SSD AP0512Z	3217.8 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (2873 - 3243, n=3, last 2 years)	3111 MB/s -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Apple SSD AP1024Z	2992.9 MB/s -7%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple SSD AP1024Z	2873.2 MB/s -11%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Z	1652.8 MB/s -49%

图形卡

我们的评测设备配备了 10 核 M3 GPU，我们已经熟悉了它。 MacBook Pro 14 M3.最大功耗约为 15 瓦，性能基本与 MacBook Pro 相同。不过，在连续负载情况下，Air 的性能也会略有下降。在 3DMark WildLife Extreme 压力测试中，运行 20 次后，Air 的性能下降了约 17%，这使它比较小的 MBA 13 M3 更稳定。更小的 MBA 13.在图形处理器性能方面，我们也观察到与旧的 10 核 M2 图形处理器相比有 20% 的优势。在电池模式下，图形处理性能保持不变，更多基准测试请点击这里。

MacBook 上的游戏速度正在慢慢加快，《全面战争：法老》或《博德之门 3》等游戏都可以在 MacBook 上运行。但是，《博德之门 3》在高分辨率下的要求过高，这意味着你必须激活 FSR。这样即使在 1080p/high 下也能达到 35fps 左右。不过，使用 FSR 时，至少应选择 "质量"设置，否则图形质量会受到明显影响。古墓丽影》或Witcher 3 等模拟游戏也能在 MacBook 上运行，但根据游戏名称的不同，可能会有一些限制，性能也会受到一定影响。

3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2

3DMark - Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	14545 Points +76%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	12968 Points +57%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	12094 Points +46%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	8286 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (8239 - 8302, n=3)	8276 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6869 Points -17%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6558 Points -21%
Average of class Subnotebook (2798 - 9340, n=26, last 2 years)	6047 Points -27%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	5556 Points -33%

GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	97.8 fps +86%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	92.1 fps +75%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	79 fps +50%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	52.6 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (51.8 - 52.6, n=3)	52.2 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	47.9 fps -9%
Average of class Subnotebook (12 - 88.9, n=13, last 2 years)	41.5 fps -21%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	219.7 fps +83%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	210.4 fps +75%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	178.7 fps +49%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	120 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (114.4 - 121, n=3)	118.5 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	107.7 fps -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (31 - 120, n=12, last 2 years)	83.2 fps -31%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	436 fps +68%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	434.4 fps +67%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	376.3 fps +45%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (259 - 269, n=3)	263 fps +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	260 fps
Average of class Subnotebook (79 - 260, n=8, last 2 years)	177.1 fps -32%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	136 fps -48%

Geekbench 5.5
Metal Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	55240 Points +59%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	52054 Points +49%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	46145 Points +33%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	34823 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (34398 - 34823, n=3)	34608 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (30149 - 34823, n=3, last 2 years)	33192 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	30149 Points -13%
OpenCL Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	52441 Points +62%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	46941 Points +45%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	45348 Points +40%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	35623 Points +10%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32496 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	32440 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (31647 - 32540, n=3)	32209 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	30010 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (11490 - 61067, n=55, last 2 years)	28429 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	27696 Points -15%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	20872 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	20846 Points -36%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	20433 Points -37%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	20293 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U	14435 Points -56%

Geekbench 6.2
GPU Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	78324 Points +64%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	68043 Points +43%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	47699 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (47494 - 47699, n=3)	47626 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (45460 - 47699, n=3, last 2 years)	46948 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	45460 Points -5%
GPU OpenCL
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	50373 Points +65%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	42798 Points +40%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	35606 Points +17%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32096 Points +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	31025 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	30470 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (30414 - 30506, n=3)	30463 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	27920 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (10340 - 52427, n=46, last 2 years)	26980 Points -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	17221 Points -43%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	16207 Points -47%

3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2

Blender: v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	237 Seconds * -84%
Average of class Subnotebook (129 - 237, n=3, last 2 years)	166.7 Seconds * -29%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	129 Seconds *
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (121 - 134, n=3)	128 Seconds * +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	97 Seconds * +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	73 Seconds * +43%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	69 Seconds * +47%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U	676 Seconds * -38%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P	645 Seconds * -31%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	594 Seconds * -21%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (491 - 761, n=3)	590 Seconds * -20%
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=57, last 2 years)	551 Seconds * -12%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3	491 Seconds *
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	452 Seconds * +8%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	380 Seconds * +23%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	374 Seconds * +24%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core	355 Seconds * +28%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	336 Seconds * +32%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	331 Seconds * +33%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	314 Seconds * +36%

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3 | Total War Pharaoh | Baldur's Gate 3 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU	57 fps +58%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	54.1 (48^min) fps +50%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 92, n=53, last 2 years)	42 fps +17%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.2 (33^min, 33^P1) fps +3%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (36 - 38, n=3)	36.7 fps +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU	36 fps
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	34 fps -6%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.2 (21^min) fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	27.9 fps -22%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.6 fps -29%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.1 fps -36%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU	51 fps +113%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	43 fps +79%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU	39 fps +63%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	28 fps +17%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (24 - 28, n=3)	25.3 fps +5%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	25.2 (22^min) fps +5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU	24 fps
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 44.2, n=55, last 2 years)	22.2 fps -7%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.1 (10.9^min) fps -25%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.3 fps -28%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.8 (16^min, 16^P1) fps -30%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15.1 (12^min) fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	13.6 (12^min, 13^P1) fps -43%

Total War Pharaoh
1920x1080 High Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	77 fps +75%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU	67 fps +52%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU	44 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (43 - 45, n=3)	44 fps 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (16.2 - 59, n=7, last 2 years)	43.2 fps -2%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	58 fps +66%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU	53 fps +51%
Average of class Subnotebook (28 - 50, n=5, last 2 years)	35.3 fps +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU	35 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (28 - 36, n=3)	33 fps -6%

Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 High Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	53 fps +141%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU	42 fps +91%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	24.1 fps +10%
Average of class Subnotebook (13.2 - 31.2, n=26, last 2 years)	22.9 fps +4%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU	22 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (21 - 22, n=2)	21.5 fps -2%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	43 fps +126%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU	39 fps +105%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	23.4 fps +23%
Average of class Subnotebook (12.1 - 31.1, n=26, last 2 years)	21.9 fps +15%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU	19 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (19 - 19, n=2)	19 fps 0%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU	72 fps +89%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	65 fps +71%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU	60 fps +58%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU	38 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (34 - 41, n=3)	37.7 fps -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (23 - 38, n=6, last 2 years)	29.7 fps -22%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	27 fps -29%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU	63 fps +97%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	57 fps +78%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU	53 fps +66%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (30 - 36, n=3)	32.7 fps +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU	32 fps
Average of class Subnotebook (22.4 - 32, n=5, last 2 years)	26.5 fps -17%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	23 fps -28%

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)			36	24
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	113	44	38	32
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	32	26	22	19
Total War Pharaoh (2023)	133	83	44	35

排放 - 静音和良好的扬声器

噪音排放

与速度相当的 Windows 设备相比，MacBook Air 15 的最大优势仍然是其被动散热。无论你用它做什么（使用两台外接显示器时也是如此），它始终是静音的，没有任何电子噪音。

	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
Noise
off / environment *	25.3	24.5	25.7	25.7	25.2	25.2
Idle Minimum *	25.3	24.5	26.1	25.7	25.2	25.2
Idle Average *	25.3	26.3	26.1	28.4	25.2	25.2
Idle Maximum *	25.3	26.3	27.2	28.4	25.2	31.6
Load Average *	43.5	36.5	44.2	45.3	43.1	45.4
Load Maximum *	50.75	52.9	47.5	45.6	43.3	45.4
Witcher 3 ultra *		46.3

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管采用了被动散热，Apple ，但机箱温度仍然得到了控制，在空闲运行或执行要求不高的任务时，笔记本电脑几乎不会发热。在一小时的压力测试后，我们在底座上下两侧的中上部区域测得的热点温度接近 44 °C。当然，这很明显，但在使用时不会造成任何限制。

Max. Load

Idle


41.8 °C	44.3 °C	37.7 °C
38.5 °C	39.3 °C	33.8 °C
32.7 °C	29.2 °C	31.5 °C

Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 36.5 °C


40.2 °C	43.4 °C	41.8 °C
37.4 °C	40 °C	39.2 °C
32.3 °C	33.4 °C	32.7 °C

Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 37.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.4 °C / -8 F).

	Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Heat		-50%	-7%	-22%	-17%	-33%	-19%
Maximum Upper Side *	44.3	51.5 -16%	48.8 -10%	44.4 -0%	43.2 2%	43.9 1%	45.9 -4%
Maximum Bottom *	43.4	62.4 -44%	47.6 -10%	48 -11%	44.7 -3%	50.4 -16%	43.5 -0%
Idle Upper Side *	23.1	41.7 -81%	24.2 -5%	31.9 -38%	32.1 -39%	35.8 -55%	31.1 -35%
Idle Bottom *	23.3	37.2 -60%	23.6 -1%	31.9 -37%	30.1 -29%	37.5 -61%	31.6 -36%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在综合负载情况下，新款 MacBook Air 15 M3 的性能比前代产品略胜一筹，而且较大的机型还能比较小的机型更长时间地保持这种性能。与 MacBook Air 13 M3一样，MacBook 现在优先考虑 GPU 性能，而它的前代产品前代产品CPU 和 GPU 之间的关系更为平衡。

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø3.02 (2.13-17.607)

Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø2.45 (1.806-16.677)

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø5 (3.802-18.05)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø9.82 (7.515-15.154)

Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø8.15 (6.38-15.743)

Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø5.23 (3.794-13.405)

发言人

大型 MacBook Air 继续提供 6 扬声器音响系统，音效依然非常宽敞和出色。体积较大的 MacBook Pro 16在这方面提供了更好的效果，但考虑到 Air 的底座非常纤薄，其音效也非常出色。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 运行时间长

耗电量

在全亮度条件下，功耗比旧型号略高一些（全亮度条件下约为 1 瓦），但最大亮度仅略有提高。在负载情况下，35 瓦的电源适配器再次成为限制因素，在使用功率更大的电源适配器进行压力测试之初，我们测得的功耗为 66 瓦，随后稳步下降。在使用 35 瓦电源适配器时，电池必须对差异进行补偿。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.17 / 0.31 Watt
Idle	2.15 / 11.2 / 11.5 Watt
Load	35.8 / 37.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2880x1664, 15.6"	Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3"	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"	MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 2560x1680, 16"	LG Gram SuperSlim (2023) i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		6%	-92%	-67%	-67%	-104%	-29%	-2%	-2%	-38%
Idle Minimum *	2.15	2.2 -2%	5.73 -167%	3 -40%	5.8 -170%	5.8 -170%	4.2 -95%	3.5 -63%	2.1 ?(1.95 - 2.2, n=3) 2%	4.6 ?(1.4 - 9.3, n=57, last 2 years) -114%
Idle Average *	11.2	10 11%	14.5 -29%	9.5 15%	6 46%	7.7 31%	8.9 21%	7 37%	10.6 ?(8.7 - 12, n=3) 5%	7.86 ?(4.4 - 16, n=57, last 2 years) 30%
Idle Maximum *	11.5	10.1 12%	15.6 -36%	12 -4%	6.9 40%	10.6 8%	10.3 10%	7.6 34%	10.9 ?(8.9 - 12.2, n=3) 5%	9.65 ?(4.6 - 16.8, n=57, last 2 years) 16%
Load Average *	35.8	33.6 6%	40.5 -13%	68.3 -91%	59 -65%	76.9 -115%	47 -31%	33 8%	35.5 ?(34.3 - 36.4, n=3) 1%	47.8 ?(19.1 - 83.3, n=55, last 2 years) -34%
Witcher 3 ultra *	29.6	27.8 6%	74.9 -153%	59.8 -102%	61.1 -106%	76.7 -159%	43.8 -48%	32.7 -10%
Load Maximum *	37.2	37.2 -0%	94 -153%	104.8 -182%	92 -147%	118 -217%	49 -32%	44 -18%	46.4 ?(35.4 - 66.7, n=3) -25%	69.8 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=57, last 2 years) -88%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø29.6 (29.2-30.7)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø36.9 (35.9-37.3)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.7 (4.59-4.89)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø9.98 (9.45-12.1)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø26.9 (23.5-30.5)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø21.9 (21.2-23.7)

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.81 (2.78-2.97)

电池寿命

电池容量仍为 66.5 Wh，Wi-Fi 在 150 cd/m² 下的运行时间约为 17 小时（最大亮度降低了 7 大级和 3 小级），比上一代产品长了几分钟。微星 Prestige 16 能比前者多出约 80 分钟，但电池容量也大了约 50%。在全屏亮度下，我们记录了 6 小时 40 分钟，比旧款短了半小时，全屏亮度下的空闲耗电量略高。我们将在稍后提供进一步的电池运行时间。

在打开笔记本电脑的情况下，随机提供的 35 瓦电源适配器只需要不到 3 个小时就能为设备完全充电。如果使用功率更大的电源适配器，这个时间可以缩短到 2 小时左右。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Safari 17.4)		16h 56min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Safari 17.4)