Notebookcheck Logo

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 评测 - 大型日常 MacBook 的升级版Apple

快速而昂贵。 在 MacBook Air 15 推出约 8 个月后,Apple ,更新了其大型日常 MacBook,由于采用了新的 M3 处理器,其性能比以前更好。此外,Wi-Fi 性能也有所提升。不过,价格依然居高不下。
ARM Apple Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Thunderbolt

去年年中,Apple ,推出了更大尺寸的 MacBook Air 15,与我们的预期完全一致:更大的 MacBook Air 拥有更大的屏幕空间,由于采用了相同的被动散热技术,性能也不相上下。现在,这款大屏幕 Air 首次升级到新的 M3 处理器,并安装了新的 Wi-Fi 模块,但除此之外,它几乎和原来一样。

Apple 入门级机型配备 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 固态硬盘,售价高达 1299 美元。现在又多了一款预配置机型(我们的评测设备),配备 16GB 内存和 512GB SSD,售价 1699 美元。这样做的好处是,在许多商店里,预配置机型的价格往往会降低。

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Processor
Apple M3 8 x 2.7 - 4.1 GHz, 21 W PL2 / Short Burst, 12 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, 15 W TDP
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5 6400, dual-channel, onboard
Display
15.60 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1664 pixel, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
Apple SSD AP0512Z, 512 GB 
, 465 GB free
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.5 x 340.4 x 237.6
Battery
66.5 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Apple macOS 14 Sonoma
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Six speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, 35W PSU dual USB-C, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.501 kg, Power Supply: 184 g
Price
2059 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
91.6 %
03/2024
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3, M3 10-Core GPU
1.5 kg11.5 mm15.60"2880x1664
84.9 %
02/2024
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg19 mm15.60"2880x1620
88.1 %
12/2023
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores
1.6 kg19.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.6 %
06/2023
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg19 mm16.00"3200x2000
86 %
06/2023
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2 kg17.8 mm16.00"2560x1680
85 %
08/2023
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
990 g10.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
80.7 %
06/2023
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.5 kg15.4 mm15.60"1920x1080

外壳 - Midnight MacBook 现在配备了全新涂层

说到 MacBook Air 15 的设计和外壳质量,基本上没有什么变化。与前代产品一样,这款更大的 Air 比 MBA 13 更薄,这也是为什么该设备的重量(1.5 千克)在你第一次拿起它时会让你大吃一惊的原因。在实际使用中,由于底座太平,坚硬的前边缘不会给手腕带来不适。制造质量依然出色,稳定性也是如此。最大开启角度为 135 度。

Apple 在颜色方面,我们依然采用了我们熟悉的四种颜色(银色、太空灰、北极星和午夜)。深蓝色的 "午夜 "款在产品照片上看起来特别漂亮,但很快就暴露出它是一个指纹磁铁,很难保持表面清洁。新的 M3 机型(午夜版)采用了与黑色 MacBook Pro 14/16 相同的阳极氧化涂层。这有助于减少指纹问题,这也是我们在新款 MacBook Air 13.不过,我们的极地之星评测样机等轻薄版本在这方面更具优势。

Air 15 的重量仅为 1.5 千克,仅次于 LG Gram(990克),但Apple 的笔记本电脑在一定程度上是最薄的设备。35 瓦的电源适配器又带来了 184 克的重量。

尺寸比较

358 mm 258 mm 19.1 mm 1.6 kg358 mm 231 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg355 mm 246 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg356.6 mm 229.1 mm 15.4 mm 1.5 kg351 mm 254.9 mm 17.8 mm 2 kg356 mm 227.45 mm 10.9 mm 990 g340.4 mm 237.6 mm 11.5 mm 1.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
MacBook Air 15(左)与Galaxy Book4 Pro(右)
MacBook Air 15(左)与Galaxy Book4 Pro(右)
MacBook Air 15(左)与Galaxy Book4 Pro(右)
MacBook Air 15(左)与Galaxy Book4 Pro(右)

我们又拍摄了一些新款三星Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 的对比照片(我们的评测将很快发布),它是目前 M3 MacBook Air 15 的竞争对手之一。Galaxy Book4 的 16 英寸 OLED 屏幕稍大一些,但直接对比不难发现,由于屏幕底部边框较厚,浪费了大量空间。这也使三星笔记本电脑的机身明显更深;此外,它的底座也比Apple 的要厚得多。

MacBook Air 15(左)与Galaxy Book4 Pro(右)
MacBook Air 15(左)与Galaxy Book4 Pro(右)
MacBook Air 15(左)与Galaxy Book4 Pro(右)
MacBook Air 15(左)与Galaxy Book4 Pro(右)

功能 - 现在您可以控制两个显示屏

端口方面没有变化。除了电源适配器的 MagSafe 接口外,左侧仍有两个 USB-C 端口(4.0),仍然只支持 Thunderbolt 3。右侧只有 3.5 毫米音频接口,我们希望能看到另一个 USB 端口。15 英寸机型的闲置空间更为明显。

控制两个外部监视器(这里以 MBA 13 M3 为例)。
控制两个外部监视器(这里以 MBA 13 M3 为例)。

不过,有一项新功能。到目前为止 MacBook Air 15 M2除了内置面板外,只能控制一个外接显示器。M3 SoC 的硬件要求相同,这意味着它只能控制两台显示器,但当显示器盖子关闭时,现在可以使用两台外接显示器(1 台最高 6K/60 Hz,1 台最高 5K/60 Hz)。当然,这还不够完美,但绝对是一个进步,如果你想使用两台显示器,它可以让你的使用体验完全不同。

我们用 MBA 13 和两台外接显示器(一台通过 USB-C,一台通过 USB-C/HDMI 适配器)试用了这项新功能,效果非常好。我们使用 MacBook Pro 14 M3也将在未来某个时候通过软件更新获得这一功能。

交流

Apple 更新了 Wi-Fi 模块,现在它支持频率为 160 MHz 的 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。与我们的华硕参考路由器搭配使用,效果立竿见影,因为新款 MacBook Air M3 现在的速度是前代产品的两倍。 速度的两倍与更大的 MacBook Pro 机型不相上下。

Networking
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1698 (min: 1601) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1756 (min: 1717) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
911 (min: 468) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1274 (min: 787) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1391 (min: 670) MBit/s ∼90%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1144 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1317 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1210 (min: 747) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1111 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼72%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1459 (min: 796) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1553 (min: 1528) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1583 (min: 1034) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1337 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼86%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1498 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1476 (min: 1300) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1442 (min: 1087) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1539 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼99%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1551 (min: 796) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1580 (min: 1553) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1580 (min: 1112) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1551 (min: 1516) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1649 (min: 1353) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1720 (min: 1676) MBit/s ∼98%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1698 (1601-1722)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1756 (1717-1808)

网络摄像头

在光线充足的情况下,1080p 网络摄像头仍能拍摄出不错的照片,麦克风也没有任何问题。您还可以选择将 iPhone 用作网络摄像头。

ColorChecker
18.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
14 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Air 15 M3: 11.86 ∆E min: 3.18 - max: 22.95 ∆E

维护

与之前的情况一样,只要使用合适的十字螺丝刀,就可以卸下机箱下盖。不过,由于没有风扇,而且所有元件都是焊接的,所以最终还是可以省去拆卸的麻烦。如果需要,可以更换粘合的电池,但这有点麻烦,只能由合格的维修人员来完成。

内部布局
内部布局
下机箱盖
下机箱盖

输入设备 - 出色的触控板

与 MacBook Air M2 相比,输入设备没有任何变化。键盘的质量虽然没有达到高级商务笔记本电脑的水平,但总的来说,键盘输入准确,输入舒适。Touch ID 指纹扫描仪的工作仍然无可挑剔,而且多年来,Apple ,由于其多级亮度设置和自动适应环境光线的能力,在白色键盘背光方面一直是值得追赶的公司。

大尺寸触控板仍然是移动领域的典范,它与 macOS 的集成也非常出色。有了 Force Touch,点击在任何地方都是一样的,声音也不会太大,此外,手势操作也实现得非常完美。与往常一样,MacBook Air 没有配备触摸屏。

显示屏 - P3 覆盖的 IPS

反光在室内也会令人讨厌
反光在室内也会令人讨厌

对于 Air,Apple 仍然选择使用 15.6 英寸 IPS 屏幕。分辨率为 2,880 x 1,864 像素,有点奇怪。额外的 64 个垂直像素用于凹槽旁边的区域。这看起来仍然不是特别好,但并没有侵蚀 16:10 面板的实际空间。

该面板的主观画质依然非常出色。色彩鲜艳,内容清晰,macOS 也依然没有出现缩放问题。不过,在刷新率方面,我们希望能升级到 120 Hz,因为我们使用的仍然是 60 Hz 的面板。响应时间并不突出,在日常使用中也不会出现重影现象。没有 PWM,屏幕亮度和色温都能自动适应环境光线。

子像素结构
子像素结构
无漏光
无漏光

我们在显示屏中部测得的最大亮度为 525 cd/m²,平均亮度略高于 500 cd/m²。然而,0.37 cd/m² 的黑色值非常高,这就是为什么与 OLED 或微型 LED 面板相比,暗色内容永远不会呈现全黑的原因。对比度为 1.400:1。与 MacBook Air 13 不同的是,较大的 Air 15 并不存在漏光问题。

490
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
509
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 527 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 506.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 525 cd/m²
Contrast: 1422:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
IPS, 2880x1664, 15.60
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.60
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16.00
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Samsung ATNA56YX08-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
BOE 18 NE156FHM-NS0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
3%
-2%
5%
-22%
4%
-47%
Display P3 Coverage
98.7
99.93
1%
96.7
-2%
99.91
1%
63
-36%
99.8
1%
43.17
-56%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
100
0%
99.8
0%
100
0%
94.9
-5%
100
0%
65.03
-35%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.8
95.52
9%
84.6
-4%
98.87
13%
65.1
-26%
98.09
12%
44.6
-49%
Response Times
91%
-79%
91%
-3%
91%
36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35.3 ?(16.4, 17.9)
2 ?(1, 1)
94%
49.4 ?(22.6, 26.8)
-40%
2 ?(1, 1)
94%
34 ?(16, 18)
4%
2 ?(1, 1)
94%
20 ?(3, 17)
43%
Response Time Black / White *
15.6 ?(5.2, 10.4)
2 ?(1, 1)
87%
33.9 ?(15.6, 18.3)
-117%
2 ?(1, 1)
87%
17 ?(7, 10)
-9%
2 ?(1, 1)
87%
11 ?(2, 9)
29%
PWM Frequency
240
227 ?(50)
26 ?(10)
Screen
81%
-99%
-92%
-23%
-70%
-188%
Brightness middle
526
370.4
-30%
473.6
-10%
370
-30%
448
-15%
395
-25%
308
-41%
Brightness
506
376
-26%
456
-10%
371
-27%
436
-14%
392
-23%
290
-43%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
87
-5%
98
7%
93
1%
97
5%
83
-10%
Black Level *
0.37
0.02
95%
0.19
49%
0.35
5%
0.1
73%
0.425
-15%
Contrast
1422
18520
1202%
2493
75%
1280
-10%
3950
178%
725
-49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.51
-8%
5.9
-321%
2.77
-98%
1.6
-14%
2.2
-57%
5.27
-276%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2
2.89
-45%
9.37
-369%
4.08
-104%
4.44
-122%
4.43
-122%
16.43
-722%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.6
3.36
-460%
0.89
-48%
2.83
-372%
0.64
-7%
4.65
-675%
2.58
-330%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
2.1
-0%
7.3
-248%
2.58
-23%
2.78
-32%
1.78
15%
6.38
-204%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.2 100%
1.9 116%
2.46 89%
2.39 92%
2.4 92%
CCT
6865 95%
6536 99%
7260 90%
6241 104%
6582 99%
6284 103%
7784 84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
2.43
Total Average (Program / Settings)
58% / 66%
-60% / -75%
1% / -38%
-16% / -20%
8% / -31%
-66% / -126%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN 灰鳞片
CalMAN 灰鳞片
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 灰度标尺已校准
CalMAN 灰度标尺已校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准

开箱后,面板的校准效果不错,灰度和色彩的 DeltaE 2000 偏差(与 P3 参考值相比)均低于 3。 较小的模型我们的专业 CalMAN 软件分析(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)记录了轻微的蓝色色调和接近过冷的冷色温。通过校准(上面有免费下载的配置文件),我们控制住了这两种情况,偏差也明显降低。不过,最大亮度降低了约 20 cd/m²。完全覆盖 P3 色彩空间。

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
与 Adobe
与 Adobe

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 10.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 17.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

室外(阴天)
室外(阴天)
在阳光下
在阳光下

虽然 Macbook Air 的显示屏是亮面的,但它不像大多数配备 OLED 面板或触摸屏的 Windows 笔记本电脑那样反光。这意味着,只要阳光不直接照射到屏幕上,你仍然可以在明亮的环境中顺利工作。可视角度稳定性非常好。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Air 15 始终配备速度更快的 M3 SoC

与较小的 MacBook Air 13 不同,15 英寸机型只提供 M3 SoC 及其更快的 10 核图形处理器。此外,你还可以选择 8、16 或 24 GB 的焊接内存和最大容量为 2 TB 的固态硬盘。电源适配器(35 瓦或 70 瓦)的选择不会影响 MacBook Air M3 的性能。

Prozessor -Apple M3 in 3 nm

Apple M3 SoC(来源: )Apple
Apple M3 SoC(来源: )Apple

M3 SoC Apple M3 SoC是Apple 首款采用 3 纳米工艺制造的芯片。其内核配置与旧的 M2 SoC但由于改进了制造工艺,Apple 能够在不大幅增加功耗的情况下提高时钟频率。现在,四个性能内核的最高主频为 4.056 GHz(或当所有内核都处于紧张状态时约为 3.6 GHz),而四个效率内核的最高主频为 2.748 GHz。在多核测试中,处理器的功耗短暂达到约 21 瓦,然后下降并最终稳定在约 12 瓦(R23 多核:9085 点意味着减少约 12%)。这使得性能下降幅度低于 MacBook Air 13。在简短测试中,性能与 MacBook Pro 14 M3当然,由于采用了主动散热技术,性能保持稳定。

与旧版 M2 SoC 相比,性能平均提高了约 20%。结果是,在多核测试中,M3 SoC 的速度普遍低于其 16 英寸竞争对手,CPU 的功耗是后者的四倍。

在单核测试中,Apple ,性能比 M2 提高了 20%,从而缩小了与英特尔和 AMD 的差距。只有部分酷睿 i9 CPU 仍有优势。这些都是令人印象深刻的结果,尤其是考虑到 5 瓦多一点的低单核功耗。在我们的分析文章中,我们已经对 M3 SoC 的效率进行了分析。 分析文章中.在电池模式下,MacBook Air 15 M3 的 CPU 性能保持稳定。其他 CPU 基准测试 这里.

Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
17754 Points +72%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
15591 Points +51%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
15106 Points +47%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
15013 (14365.6min - 15012.9max) Points +46%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
14787 Points +44%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
14099 Points +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
13315 Points +29%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3
10298 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years)
10289 Points 0%
Average Apple M3
  (10074 - 10454, n=3)
10275 Points 0%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Core i7-1360P
9494 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U
8915 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
8569 Points -17%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
2037 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
1977 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
1942 Points +2%
Average Apple M3
  (1900 - 1904, n=3)
1901 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3
1900 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
1891 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
1772 Points -7%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Core i7-1360P
1760 Points -7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U
1685 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
1647 Points -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years)
1627 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
1589 Points -16%
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
15480 Points +28%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
14412 Points +19%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12727 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
12611 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3
12066 Points
Average Apple M3
  (11863 - 12066, n=4)
11982 Points -1%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Core i7-1360P
11402 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6796 - 13217, n=26, last 2 years)
11293 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
10093 Points -16%
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
3138 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3
3130 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
3113 Points -1%
Average Apple M3
  (3026 - 3130, n=4)
3083 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
2716 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
2593 Points -17%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Core i7-1360P
2564 Points -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2003 - 3130, n=26, last 2 years)
2503 Points -20%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2418 Points -23%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
15298 Points +45%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
14859 Points +41%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
13768 Points +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
13312 Points +26%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12499 Points +18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
11831 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
11817 Points +12%
Average Apple M3
  (10570 - 10774, n=3)
10697 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3
10570 Points
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Core i7-1360P
9967 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years)
9084 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
8961 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U
8044 Points -24%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3
2350 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
2331 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
2327 Points -1%
Average Apple M3
  (2256 - 2350, n=3)
2316 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
2003 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
1961 Points -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H
1949 Points -17%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
1917 Points -18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
1861 Points -21%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Core i7-1360P
1830 Points -22%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1749 Points -26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)
1701 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U
1672 Points -29%
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
1059 Points +77%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
908 Points +52%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
848 Points +42%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (366 - 902, n=9, last 2 years)
685 Points +15%
Average Apple M3
  (576 - 712, n=3)
629 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3
598 Points
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
513 Points -14%
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
144 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
143 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3
142 Points
Average Apple M3
  (140 - 142, n=3)
141 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2
121 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (90 - 142, n=9, last 2 years)
112.1 Points -21%

系统性能

非晶记忆标记
非晶记忆标记

在日常使用中,旧款 MacBook Air 15 M2已经是一款速度极快的设备,M3 SoC 也是如此。最重要的是,在本地应用程序中,它的性能非常出色,而在合成基准测试中,新款 MacBook Air 15 M3 几乎总是领先于 Windows 竞争产品。

基于英特尔处理器的 Mac 应用程序可以通过 Rosetta 2 进行模拟,效果非常好。虽然在速度上存在差异(尤其是在复杂的应用程序上),但运行起来同样完美无瑕。人工智能是当前非常热门的话题,而Apple 也在其神经引擎中安装了 NPU,自 M1 芯片并将其用于信息中的单词预测。喜欢使用包括 Copilot 在内的微软办公套件的用户不必担心这个问题,因为该功能是通过云提供的,这意味着与 Windows 设备没有区别。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Jetstream 2: Total Score
CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2146 Points +16%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1868 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1857 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (1847 - 1857, n=3)
1850 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1811 Points -2%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1769 Points -5%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1670 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years)
1553 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1450 Points -22%
CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2064 Points +19%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1787 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1728 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (1716 - 1729, n=3)
1724 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1722 Points 0%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1693 Points -2%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1634 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years)
1507 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1428 (1479min - 1268max) Points -17%
CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2224 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
2210 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (2183 - 2210, n=3)
2197 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2041 Points -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2009 Points -9%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1928 Points -13%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1708 Points -23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years)
1690 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1528 Points -31%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2171 Points +59%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1715 Points +25%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
1666 Points +22%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1556 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1474 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1367 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (1364 - 1367, n=3)
1366 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years)
1329 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1299 Points -5%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
448 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (423 - 448, n=3)
439 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
339 Points -24%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
321 Points -28%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
303 Points -32%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
299 Points -33%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (119.2 - 448, n=63, last 2 years)
284 Points -37%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
263 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
254 Points -43%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
315 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (313 - 315, n=2)
314 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
295 Points -6%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
271 Points -14%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
263 Points -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (67.2 - 325, n=50, last 2 years)
240 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
230 Points -27%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
228 Points -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Subnotebook
  (363 - 1913, n=67, last 2 years)
587 ms * -62%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
562 ms * -55%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
525 ms * -45%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
502 ms * -38%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
498 ms * -37%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
491 ms * -35%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
456 ms * -26%
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (363 - 373, n=3)
366 ms * -1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
363.1 ms *
Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
317.5 Points
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (305 - 318, n=3)
313 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (166.4 - 478, n=38, last 2 years)
263 Points -17%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
258.579 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
235.539 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

非晶盘标记
非晶盘标记

与 Pro 机型不同,Apple 的 Air 采用了 PCIe 3.0 固态硬盘。我们的评测设备安装了 512 GB 版本(AP0512Z),其传输速度达到了预期水平,最高可达 3.5 GB/s。在日常使用中,这意味着没有任何限制。同样,我们预计 256 GB 型号的性能会大大降低(约 50%),我们将尽快对其进行检查。首次启动后,用户有 465 GB 的可用空间。Air M3 可配置最大容量为 2 TB 的固态硬盘。其他固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
100 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple SSD AP0512Z
77.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple SSD AP0512Z
76.1 pt
Average Apple SSD AP0512Z
 
59.4 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple SSD AP0512Z
52.7 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple SSD AP1024Z
50.3 pt
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple SSD AP1024Z
49 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
46.8 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
26.7 pt
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
5359.8 MB/s +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple SSD AP0512Z
4756.4 MB/s +61%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple SSD AP0512Z
4645.3 MB/s +58%
Average Apple SSD AP0512Z
  (2896 - 4756, n=7)
3422 MB/s +16%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple SSD AP0512Z
2947.8 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2876.6 MB/s -2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2847.5 MB/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1476 - 2948, n=6, last 2 years)
2632 MB/s -11%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1475.8 MB/s -50%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
6388.9 MB/s +99%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple SSD AP0512Z
4198.7 MB/s +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple SSD AP0512Z
4192.9 MB/s +30%
Average Apple SSD AP0512Z
  (3123 - 4199, n=7)
3517 MB/s +9%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple SSD AP0512Z
3217.8 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2992.9 MB/s -7%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2873.2 MB/s -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1653 - 3243, n=6, last 2 years)
2840 MB/s -12%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1652.8 MB/s -49%

图形卡

3DMark 野生动物压力测试
3DMark 野生动物压力测试

我们的评测设备配备了 10 核 M3 GPU,我们已经熟悉了它。 MacBook Pro 14 M3.最大功耗约为 15 瓦,性能基本与 MacBook Pro 相同。不过,在连续负载情况下,Air 的性能也会略有下降。在 3DMark WildLife Extreme 压力测试中,运行 20 次后,Air 的性能下降了约 17%,这使它比较小的 MBA 13 M3 更稳定。 更小的 MBA 13.在图形处理器性能方面,我们也观察到与旧的 10 核 M2 图形处理器相比有 20% 的优势。在电池模式下,图形处理性能保持不变,更多基准测试请点击这里。

MacBook 上的游戏速度正在慢慢加快,《全面战争:法老》或《博德之门 3》等游戏都可以在 MacBook 上运行。但是,《博德之门 3》在高分辨率下的要求过高,这意味着你必须激活 FSR。这样即使在 1080p/high 下也能达到 35fps 左右。不过,使用 FSR 时,至少应选择 "质量"设置,否则图形质量会受到明显影响。古墓丽影》或Witcher 3 等模拟游戏也能在 MacBook 上运行,但根据游戏名称的不同,可能会有一些限制,性能也会受到一定影响。

3DMark - Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
14545 Points +76%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
12968 Points +57%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
12094 Points +46%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
8286 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (8239 - 8302, n=3)
8276 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6869 Points -17%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6558 Points -21%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
5556 Points -33%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2438 - 9340, n=24, last 2 years)
5503 Points -34%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
97.8 fps +86%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
92.1 fps +75%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
79 fps +50%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
52.6 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (51.8 - 52.6, n=3)
52.2 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
47.9 fps -9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12 - 52.6, n=9, last 2 years)
39.5 fps -25%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
219.7 fps +83%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
210.4 fps +75%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
178.7 fps +49%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
120 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (114.4 - 121, n=3)
118.5 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
107.7 fps -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (31 - 120, n=10, last 2 years)
89.5 fps -25%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
436 fps +68%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
434.4 fps +67%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
376.3 fps +45%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (259 - 269, n=3)
263 fps +1%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
260 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (79 - 260, n=9, last 2 years)
185.1 fps -29%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
136 fps -48%
Geekbench 5.5
Metal Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
55240 Points +59%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
52054 Points +49%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
46145 Points +33%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
34823 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (34398 - 34823, n=3)
34608 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (26079 - 34823, n=6, last 2 years)
31015 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
30149 Points -13%
OpenCL Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
52441 Points +62%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
46941 Points +45%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
45348 Points +40%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
35623 Points +10%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32496 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
32440 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (31647 - 32540, n=3)
32209 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30010 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27696 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10477 - 61067, n=66, last 2 years)
23958 Points -26%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H
20872 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
20846 Points -36%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
20433 Points -37%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
20293 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
14435 Points -56%
Geekbench 6.2
GPU Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
78324 Points +64%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
68043 Points +43%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
47699 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (47494 - 47699, n=3)
47626 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (45460 - 47699, n=3, last 2 years)
46948 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
45460 Points -5%
GPU OpenCL
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
50373 Points +65%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
42798 Points +40%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35606 Points +17%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32096 Points +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
31025 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
30470 Points
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (30414 - 30506, n=3)
30463 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27920 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10340 - 52427, n=26, last 2 years)
25855 Points -15%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
17221 Points -43%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
16207 Points -47%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
237 Seconds * -84%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (129 - 237, n=3, last 2 years)
166.7 Seconds * -29%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
129 Seconds *
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (121 - 134, n=3)
128 Seconds * +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
97 Seconds * +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
73 Seconds * +43%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
69 Seconds * +47%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1335U
676 Seconds * -38%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
645 Seconds * -31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (336 - 1548, n=54, last 2 years)
624 Seconds * -27%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
594 Seconds * -21%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (491 - 761, n=3)
590 Seconds * -20%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
491 Seconds *
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H
452 Seconds * +8%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
380 Seconds * +23%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
374 Seconds * +24%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
355 Seconds * +28%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
336 Seconds * +32%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
331 Seconds * +33%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
314 Seconds * +36%

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
57 fps +58%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
54.1 (48min) fps +50%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
37.2 (33min, 33P1) fps +3%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (36 - 38, n=3)
36.7 fps +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
36 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.2 - 92, n=56, last 2 years)
34.9 fps -3%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
34 fps -6%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28.2 (21min) fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
27.9 fps -22%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.6 fps -29%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
23.1 fps -36%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
51 fps +113%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
43 fps +79%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
39 fps +63%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
28 fps +17%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (24 - 28, n=3)
25.3 fps +5%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
25.2 (22min) fps +5%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
24 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years)
18.9 fps -21%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18.1 (10.9min) fps -25%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
17.3 fps -28%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.8 (16min, 16P1) fps -30%
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
15.1 (12min) fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
13.6 (12min, 13P1) fps -43%
Total War Pharaoh
1920x1080 High Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
77 fps +75%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
67 fps +52%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
44 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (43 - 45, n=3)
44 fps 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16.2 - 45.6, n=5, last 2 years)
36.9 fps -16%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
58 fps +66%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps +51%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
35 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (28 - 36, n=3)
33 fps -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (28 - 35.5, n=4, last 2 years)
31.7 fps -9%
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 High Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
53 fps +141%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
42 fps +91%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
24.1 fps +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20.6 - 26.1, n=7, last 2 years)
22.7 fps +3%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
22 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (21 - 22, n=2)
21.5 fps -2%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
43 fps +126%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
39 fps +105%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
23.4 fps +23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (19 - 25.7, n=7, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +12%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
19 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (19 - 19, n=2)
19 fps 0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
72 fps +89%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
65 fps +71%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
60 fps +58%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
38 fps
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (34 - 41, n=3)
37.7 fps -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (24 - 50, n=10, last 2 years)
31.4 fps -17%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
27 fps -29%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
63 fps +97%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
57 fps +78%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps +66%
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
  (30 - 36, n=3)
32.7 fps +2%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
32 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 42, n=9, last 2 years)
27.4 fps -14%
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
23 fps -28%
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 36 24
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 113 44 38 32
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 32 26 22 19
Total War Pharaoh (2023) 133 83 44 35

排放 - 静音和良好的扬声器

噪音排放

与速度相当的 Windows 设备相比,MacBook Air 15 的最大优势仍然是其被动散热。无论你用它做什么(使用两台外接显示器时也是如此),它始终是静音的,没有任何电子噪音。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highshearing rangehide median Fan Noise
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
Noise
off / environment *
25.3
24.5
25.7
25.7
25.2
25.2
Idle Minimum *
25.3
24.5
26.1
25.7
25.2
25.2
Idle Average *
25.3
26.3
26.1
28.4
25.2
25.2
Idle Maximum *
25.3
26.3
27.2
28.4
25.2
31.6
Load Average *
43.5
36.5
44.2
45.3
43.1
45.4
Load Maximum *
50.75
52.9
47.5
45.6
43.3
45.4
Witcher 3 ultra *
46.3

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管采用了被动散热,Apple ,但机箱温度仍然得到了控制,在空闲运行或执行要求不高的任务时,笔记本电脑几乎不会发热。在一小时的压力测试后,我们在底座上下两侧的中上部区域测得的热点温度接近 44 °C。当然,这很明显,但在使用时不会造成任何限制。

Max. Load
 41.8 °C44.3 °C37.7 °C 
 38.5 °C39.3 °C33.8 °C 
 32.7 °C29.2 °C31.5 °C 
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
40.2 °C43.4 °C41.8 °C
37.4 °C40 °C39.2 °C
32.3 °C33.4 °C32.7 °C
Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 37.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.7 °C / 90.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.4 °C / -8 F).
表面温度应力测试(上侧)
表面温度应力测试(上侧)
表面温度应力测试(下侧)
表面温度应力测试(下侧)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Heat
-50%
-7%
-22%
-17%
-33%
-19%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.3
51.5
-16%
48.8
-10%
44.4
-0%
43.2
2%
43.9
1%
45.9
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
43.4
62.4
-44%
47.6
-10%
48
-11%
44.7
-3%
50.4
-16%
43.5
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
23.1
41.7
-81%
24.2
-5%
31.9
-38%
32.1
-39%
35.8
-55%
31.1
-35%
Idle Bottom *
23.3
37.2
-60%
23.6
-1%
31.9
-37%
30.1
-29%
37.5
-61%
31.6
-36%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在综合负载情况下,新款 MacBook Air 15 M3 的性能比前代产品略胜一筹,而且较大的机型还能比较小的机型更长时间地保持这种性能。与 MacBook Air 13 M3一样,MacBook 现在优先考虑 GPU 性能,而它的前代产品 前代产品CPU 和 GPU 之间的关系更为平衡。

0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø3.02 (2.13-17.607)
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø2.45 (1.806-16.677)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø5 (3.802-18.05)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø9.82 (7.515-15.154)
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø8.15 (6.38-15.743)
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø5.23 (3.794-13.405)

发言人

大型 MacBook Air 继续提供 6 扬声器音响系统,音效依然非常宽敞和出色。体积较大的 MacBook Pro 16在这方面提供了更好的效果,但考虑到 Air 的底座非常纤薄,其音效也非常出色。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.240.5253231.93129.831.74031.932.25025.330.36324.8408020.849.610020.454.512520.157.816015.757.420017.4632502066.231515.268.840013.572.350011.172.563010.77080010.867.9100010.567.5125010.372.8160010.374.2200010.572.5250011.171315011.572.3400011.775.8500012.274.8630012.775.8800012.474.91000012.469.81250012.469.91600011.861.6SPL2485.1N0.567.8median 12.2median 70Delta2.23.52120.22123.924.723.926.225.726.22020.12027.629.527.630.318.130.348.413.148.457.916.457.963.822.563.861.814.561.855.311.655.351.612.151.660.111.560.168.110.668.167.31067.366.79.266.770.510.170.575.810.275.875.910.275.976.810.576.873.910.773.971.411.171.468.912.368.967.812.167.867.113.267.173.21873.281.617.681.684.620.984.675.416.275.463.812.163.887.72687.7710.771median 68.9median 12.1median 68.95.82.85.837.937.731.732.529.633.128.933.425.533.125.845.5205519.360.319.765.617.56617.172.417.374.613.675.111.572.710.472.29.872.59.674.59.772.59.874.310.570.910.873.711.174.811.7721270.312.268.612.469.112.569.812.668.312.468.712.169.623.784.30.567.8median 12.1median 722.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Air 15 M3Huawei MateBook 16s i9Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 运行时间长

耗电量

在全亮度条件下,功耗比旧型号略高一些(全亮度条件下约为 1 瓦),但最大亮度仅略有提高。在负载情况下,35 瓦的电源适配器再次成为限制因素,在使用功率更大的电源适配器进行压力测试之初,我们测得的功耗为 66 瓦,随后稳步下降。在使用 35 瓦电源适配器时,电池必须对差异进行补偿。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.17 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.15 / 11.2 / 11.5 Watt
Load midlight 35.8 / 37.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2880x1664, 15.60
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.30
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.60
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 2560x1680, 16.00
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
6%
-92%
-67%
-67%
-104%
-29%
-2%
-2%
-40%
Idle Minimum *
2.15
2.2
-2%
5.73
-167%
3
-40%
5.8
-170%
5.8
-170%
4.2
-95%
3.5
-63%
Idle Average *
11.2
10
11%
14.5
-29%
9.5
15%
6
46%
7.7
31%
8.9
21%
7
37%
10.6 ?(8.7 - 12, n=3)
5%
Idle Maximum *
11.5
10.1
12%
15.6
-36%
12
-4%
6.9
40%
10.6
8%
10.3
10%
7.6
34%
Load Average *
35.8
33.6
6%
40.5
-13%
68.3
-91%
59
-65%
76.9
-115%
47
-31%
33
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
29.6
27.8
6%
74.9
-153%
59.8
-102%
61.1
-106%
76.7
-159%
43.8
-48%
32.7
-10%
Load Maximum *
37.2
37.2
-0%
94
-153%
104.8
-182%
92
-147%
118
-217%
49
-32%
44
-18%
46.4 ?(35.4 - 66.7, n=3)
-25%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

05101520253035Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø29.6 (29.2-30.7)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø36.9 (35.9-37.3)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.7 (4.59-4.89)

Power consumption with an external monitor

051015202530Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø9.98 (9.45-12.1)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø26.9 (23.5-30.5)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø21.9 (21.2-23.7)
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.81 (2.78-2.97)

电池寿命

电池容量仍为 66.5 Wh,Wi-Fi 在 150 cd/m² 下的运行时间约为 17 小时(最大亮度降低了 7 大级和 3 小级),比上一代产品长了几分钟。微星 Prestige 16 能比前者多出约 80 分钟,但电池容量也大了约 50%。在全屏亮度下,我们记录了 6 小时 40 分钟,比旧款短了半小时,全屏亮度下的空闲耗电量略高。我们将在稍后提供进一步的电池运行时间。

在打开笔记本电脑的情况下,随机提供的 35 瓦电源适配器只需要不到 3 个小时就能为设备完全充电。如果使用功率更大的电源适配器,这个时间可以缩短到 2 小时左右。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Safari 17.4)
16h 56min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Safari 17.4)
6h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 39min
Apple MacBook Air 15 M3
M3, M3 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 99.9 Wh
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 65 Wh
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 84 Wh
LG Gram SuperSlim (2023)
i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book3 15, Core i5-1335U
i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 54 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
4%
-24%
6%
-39%
-17%
-9%
-49%
-31%
H.264
1116
1005
-10%
537
-52%
880
-21%
426
-62%
WiFi v1.3
1016
993
-2%
510
-50%
1100
8%
467.7
-54%
787
-23%
749
-26%
397
-61%
Load
159
197
24%
209
31%
166
4%
121
-24%
142
-11%
190
19%
121
-24%

Pros

+ 优质纤薄的外壳
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 始终静音运行
+ 明亮的 p3 显示屏,无 pwm
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 150 尼特的电池寿命长
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 比以前更快的 Wi-Fi

Cons

- 既没有 Thunderbolt 4 也没有 Wi-Fi 7
- 只有 2x USB-C 接口,没有读卡器
- 供电不足的 PSU(35W)
- 无法维护,升级费用昂贵

评语:MacBook Air 15 从 M3 中获益,但价格依然昂贵

评测 Apple MacBook Air 15 M3。评测设备由Apple 德国提供。
评测 Apple MacBook Air 15 M3。评测设备由Apple 德国提供。

MacBook Air 15 M3 没有给人带来任何惊喜,虽然它配备了 M3 SoC 和更快的 Wi-Fi 模块,但并不值得升级。 MacBook Air 15 M2 - 相比,它并不值得升级。与较小的 MacBook Air 13 M3 不同的是,不得不说的是,总体而言,竞争对手的多核性能更好,而且只要安装了专用显卡,在图形处理性能方面就能享受到优势。然而,这并不是 Air 的目标,Apple ,继续努力保持与 Pro 机型的距离。这一点在端口数量有限的情况下尤为明显。

不过,MacBook Air 的优势也是显而易见的,因为它非常纤薄,而且由于采用了被动散热技术,设备始终保持静音。目前还没有任何一款被动散热的 Windows 设备能达到这样的性能指标。当然,也有其他设备能提供更高的性能、更好的屏幕或更长的电池续航时间,但通常不会集于一身。毋庸置疑,Air 并不是每个用户的理想选择。但是,如果你正在寻找一款能够处理日常任务的设备,那么你就必须努力从其他制造商那里找到一款性能相当、功能齐全的产品。

Apple MacBook Air 15 采用 M3 处理器,速度更快。尽管价格仍然很高,而且你不得不在某些方面(如端口)做出妥协,但如果你正在寻找一款适合日常使用的大屏幕、持续静音的伴侣,那么你会再次发现它是一款非常出色和全面的产品。

说到显示屏,Apple ,虽然速度缓慢,但确实有些落后于竞争对手。IPS 面板的图像质量仍然不错,PWM 也没有出现。不过,对于一款高端设备来说,60 Hz 的频率已经不能算是最新的了,同样也不支持 HDR 内容。M3 处理器的性能也没有完全保持稳定,但情况要比较小的 MacBook Air M3 稍好一些。Windows 系统的竞争对手在使用一段时间后也会出现性能下降,尤其是在多核情况下。

基本机型的价格为 1,299 美元,配备 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 固态硬盘。对于简单的任务来说,这个价格也许足够了,但它已经跟不上时代的步伐了。我们的评测机则有趣得多,因为它配备了 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘。最重要的是,它现在是预配置机型(以前只有 8/256 GB 和 8/512 GB),而且该机型现在还将作为标准版,届时也将打折。新款 Air 在发布时已经有了更便宜的价格。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

全新 MacBook Air 15 M3 现已上市。我们的评测配置零售价为 1,699 美元,可在Apple .com 上购买。.基本型号在亚马逊的售价为 1,299 美元

Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 - 03/09/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
91%
Connectivity
62 / 75 → 83%
Weight
69 / 20-75 → 89%
Games Performance
75 / 78 → 96%
Application Performance
96 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
91 / 91 → 100%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
82%
92%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 评测 - 大型日常 MacBook 的升级版Apple
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-03-12 (Update: 2024-03-12)