Notebookcheck

技嘉Aorus 15 (i7-8750H, RTX 2070) 笔记本电脑评测

灵气buff。 小11%,轻11%,GPU性能至少强17%。 Aorus 15是老旧的Aorus X5系列期待已久的更新,不过仍然缺少一些辅助性功能。
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
Aorus 15 X9 (15 Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8192 MB, Core: 1215 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 417.49
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, LGD05E8, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Storage
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, 512 GB 
, Secondary: 2 TB Seagate ST2000LM015
Soundcard
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD
Networking
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.4 x 361 x 246
Battery
62 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2 W stereo, Nahimic 3, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Aorus Control Center, Azure AI, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.4 kg, Power Supply: 854 g
Price
14000元(参考)~ 2000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: Gigabit RJ-45, USB 3.1 w/ PowerShare, MicroSD reader
Left: Gigabit RJ-45, USB 3.1 w/ PowerShare, MicroSD reader
Rear: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, mini DisplayPort 1.3, USB Type-C Gen. 2, Kensington Lock
Rear: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0, mini DisplayPort 1.3, USB Type-C Gen. 2, Kensington Lock
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 3.1
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, 2x USB 3.1
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s ∼100% +152%
Aorus X5 v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼97% +145%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
184 MB/s ∼92% +132%
Aorus 15 X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
79.3 MB/s ∼40%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +181%
Aorus X5 v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s ∼99% +179%
Dell XPS 13 9380 2019
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.6 MB/s ∼80% +124%
Aorus 15 X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
86.13 MB/s ∼36%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% +5%
Aorus X5 v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
673 MBit/s ∼98% +4%
Aorus 15 X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
645 MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% +5%
Aorus 15 X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
622 MBit/s ∼91%
Aorus X5 v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
587 MBit/s ∼86% -6%
326.3
cd/m²
310.6
cd/m²
327.3
cd/m²
306.2
cd/m²
305.1
cd/m²
283.1
cd/m²
269.6
cd/m²
267.8
cd/m²
256.2
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 327.3 cd/m² Average: 294.7 cd/m² Minimum: 13.04 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 78 %
Center on Battery: 305.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 925:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.58 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 1.33
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
95.2% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Aorus 15 X9
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Aorus X5 v8
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
AUO80ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-3%
-11%
-9%
-15%
-8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.2 (8.4, 6.8)
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-11%
18.8 (10, 8.8)
-24%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
-8%
20 (10, 10)
-32%
18 (9.2, 8.8)
-18%
Response Time Black / White *
12.4 (7.6, 4.8)
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
6%
12 (7.6, 4.4)
3%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-10%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
3%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
3%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-4%
14%
12%
-17%
-24%
Brightness middle
305.1
314.7
3%
271
-11%
250
-18%
250.9
-18%
353.6
16%
Brightness
295
312
6%
259
-12%
235
-20%
257
-13%
346
17%
Brightness Distribution
78
90
15%
87
12%
85
9%
83
6%
86
10%
Black Level *
0.33
0.38
-15%
0.27
18%
0.29
12%
0.32
3%
0.3
9%
Contrast
925
828
-10%
1004
9%
862
-7%
784
-15%
1179
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.58
2.56
1%
1.81
30%
1.46
43%
2.77
-7%
4.55
-76%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.32
4.89
-13%
3.33
23%
2.47
43%
5.89
-36%
7.91
-83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.33
1.71
-29%
2.5
-88%
3.37
-153%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
3.4
-0%
1.09
68%
1.27
63%
4
-18%
4.1
-21%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.3 96%
2.45 90%
2.4 92%
2.27 97%
2.27 97%
CCT
6374 102%
6435 101%
6435 101%
6749 96%
6901 94%
7434 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.7
60.7
0%
61
0%
60
-1%
60
-1%
57.9
-5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95.2
94.6
-1%
93
-2%
93
-2%
92
-3%
88.9
-7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -4%
2% / 10%
2% / 9%
-16% / -17%
-16% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18082 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270Tooltip
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø964 (958.5-1022)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1182 (1158.11-1265.98)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø991 (974.33-1083.86)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼91% +22%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
193 Points ∼86% +16%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
182 Points ∼81% +10%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
Intel Core i7-8565U
175 Points ∼78% +5%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points ∼77% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points ∼77% +4%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼74%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
162 Points ∼72% -2%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
142 Points ∼63% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
138 Points ∼62% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼33% +43%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
1265 Points ∼29% +24%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1237 Points ∼28% +21%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points ∼28% +19%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1113 Points ∼25% +9%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1022 Points ∼23%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
813 Points ∼19% -20%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
714 Points ∼16% -30%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
Intel Core i7-8565U
697 Points ∼16% -32%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
516 Points ∼12% -50%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
2.08 Points ∼81%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=40)
1.967 Points ∼77%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.78 Points ∼70%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.61 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.56 Points ∼61%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
13.85 Points ∼31%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)
12.2 Points ∼28%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
7.48 Points ∼17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.13 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.93 Points ∼13%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
7682 Points ∼71%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
7089 Points ∼65%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
6841 Points ∼63%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (6236 - 6645, n=25)
6479 Points ∼60%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
6115 Points ∼56%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5426 Points ∼50%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
42677 Points ∼65%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
37099 Points ∼57%
Aorus X5 v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
36819 Points ∼56%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (29664 - 35307, n=25)
33163 Points ∼51%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
21752 Points ∼33%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19801 Points ∼30%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
247 s * ∼3%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
205.94 s * ∼2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (125 - 181, n=6)
158 s * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
166 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1022 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
113.22 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
8408 Points ∼65%
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
8033 Points ∼62% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (6161 - 8408, n=4)
7133 Points ∼55% -15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6708 Points ∼52% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
6618 Points ∼51% -21%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5605 Points ∼43% -33%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5452 Points ∼42% -35%
Productivity
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
8399 Points ∼81% +15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7547 Points ∼72% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7315 Points ∼70% 0%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7299 Points ∼70%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7113 - 7331, n=4)
7240 Points ∼69% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7037 Points ∼68% -4%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6938 Points ∼67% -5%
Essentials
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
9377 Points ∼82% +5%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
8943 Points ∼78%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8277 - 8980, n=4)
8745 Points ∼76% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
8600 Points ∼75% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8517 Points ∼74% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
8429 Points ∼74% -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7200 Points ∼63% -19%
Score
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6154 Points ∼76% +5%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5870 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (5138 - 5870, n=4)
5494 Points ∼68% -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼67% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼66% -9%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4966 Points ∼61% -15%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4646 Points ∼57% -21%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5953 Points ∼90% +2%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5828 Points ∼88%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5731 Points ∼87% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points ∼86% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (5338 - 5828, n=3)
5610 Points ∼85% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼85% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4418 Points ∼67% -24%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5773 Points ∼95% +19%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4843 Points ∼79%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4676 Points ∼77% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (3662 - 4861, n=3)
4455 Points ∼73% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points ∼71% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼68% -14%
Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3631 Points ∼60% -25%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4843 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5828 points
Help
Aorus 15 X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Aorus X5 v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
AS SSD
38%
-34%
-6%
-23%
-27%
Copy Game MB/s
1070.93
1200.14
12%
936.25
-13%
706.3
-34%
Copy Program MB/s
404.34
525.53
30%
362.56
-10%
431.54
7%
Copy ISO MB/s
1328.83
1974.98
49%
1863.91
40%
642.49
-52%
Score Total
2544
4079
60%
2515
-1%
2722
7%
2039
-20%
2667
5%
Score Write
859
2010
134%
954
11%
957
11%
802
-7%
862
0%
Score Read
1116
1362
22%
1061
-5%
1180
6%
815
-27%
1221
9%
Access Time Write *
0.031
0.033
-6%
0.044
-42%
0.034
-10%
0.045
-45%
0.063
-103%
Access Time Read *
0.049
0.047
4%
0.166
-239%
0.114
-133%
0.071
-45%
0.116
-137%
4K-64 Write
584
1717.43
194%
773.05
32%
702.74
20%
570.49
-2%
655.5
12%
4K-64 Read
868.5
1125.76
30%
856.23
-1%
913.55
5%
610.88
-30%
995.38
15%
4K Write
119.55
110.72
-7%
84.51
-29%
107.12
-10%
83.83
-30%
93.41
-22%
4K Read
56.55
52.31
-7%
23.21
-59%
55.04
-3%
43.09
-24%
29.17
-48%
Seq Write
1553.41
1822.26
17%
965.76
-38%
1471.06
-5%
1474.76
-5%
1135.14
-27%
Seq Read
1912.12
1839.67
-4%
1813.23
-5%
2112.83
10%
1612.2
-16%
1967
3%

* ... smaller is better

Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2981 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1592 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 597.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 530.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2602 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1573 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63.65 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 147.2 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
5852 Points ∼62% +37%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4655 Points ∼49% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (3958 - 4627, n=12)
4278 Points ∼45% 0%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
4276 Points ∼45%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
3679 Points ∼39% -14%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3020 Points ∼32% -29%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
10720 Points ∼71% +38%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9364 Points ∼62% +21%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
8512 Points ∼57% +10%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
7754 Points ∼52%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (7006 - 8028, n=15)
7625 Points ∼51% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6728 Points ∼45% -13%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
5783 Points ∼39% -25%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
5993 Points ∼59% +30%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
5501 Points ∼54% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (4391 - 4801, n=10)
4643 Points ∼46% +1%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
4596 Points ∼45%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
4124 Points ∼41% -10%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3351 Points ∼33% -27%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
27080 Points ∼67% +34%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
23373 Points ∼58% +16%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
21515 Points ∼53% +6%
Aorus X7 DT v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H
20813 Points ∼51% +3%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
20227 Points ∼50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (18169 - 21138, n=16)
20011 Points ∼49% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
18153 Points ∼45% -10%
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H
17257 Points ∼42% -15%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
16010 Points ∼39% -21%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
15731 Points ∼39% -22%
Aorus x3 Plus v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7820HK
12298 Points ∼30% -39%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
17290 Points ∼76% +98%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13950 Points ∼62% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (8716 - 16364, n=18)
12555 Points ∼56% +44%
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H
12471 Points ∼55% +43%
Aorus X7 DT v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H
12036 Points ∼53% +38%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11825 Points ∼52% +36%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
11407 Points ∼50% +31%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
10749 Points ∼48% +23%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
9099 Points ∼40% +4%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
8716 Points ∼39%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
38485 Points ∼75% +44%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
31595 Points ∼62% +19%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
29453 Points ∼58% +11%
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
26645 Points ∼52%
Aorus X7 DT v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8850H
26201 Points ∼51% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (23335 - 27265, n=18)
25634 Points ∼50% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
22723 Points ∼44% -15%
Aorus X5 v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H
21823 Points ∼43% -18%
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
20573 Points ∼40% -23%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-8750H
20157 Points ∼39% -24%
3DMark 11 Performance
19143 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31987 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16211 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7490 points
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
101.1 fps ∼100% +41%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)
87 (min: 72, max: 100) fps ∼86% +21%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81.7 (min: 68) fps ∼81% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (64 - 82.1, n=18)
73.4 fps ∼73% +2%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
71.8 fps ∼71%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps ∼68% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
65.7 fps ∼65% -8%
MSI GL73 8SE-010US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
55.1 fps ∼55% -23%
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
40 fps ∼40% -44%
Huawei MateBook 13 i7
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
11.9 fps ∼12% -83%
01020304050607080Tooltip
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8: Ø67.2 (61-74)
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 304.5 249.3 229.8 154.3 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 236.1 197 131.3 71.8 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 211.8 145.3 132.8 115.2 fps
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Noise
13%
-5%
2%
9%
8%
off / environment *
28.2
28.8
-2%
30
-6%
30
-6%
28.4
-1%
28.6
-1%
Idle Minimum *
32.6
28.8
12%
33
-1%
32
2%
28.4
13%
28.6
12%
Idle Average *
32.7
28.8
12%
35
-7%
34
-4%
28.4
13%
28.6
13%
Idle Maximum *
32.7
29.4
10%
40
-22%
36
-10%
29.6
9%
28.6
13%
Load Average *
38.9
35.7
8%
45
-16%
42
-8%
43.5
-12%
40.8
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51.8
42.5
18%
50
3%
44
15%
45.7
12%
49.6
4%
Load Maximum *
64.1
45
30%
55
14%
48
25%
45.7
29%
49.6
23%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
32.6 / 32.7 / 32.7 dB(A)
Load
38.9 / 64.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Max. Load
 33.8 °C34.2 °C33.8 °C 
 29.2 °C36.6 °C36 °C 
 25.4 °C26 °C29.2 °C 
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Average: 31.6 °C
42.2 °C56.8 °C38.4 °C
44.6 °C33.8 °C30 °C
28.8 °C27.2 °C26.4 °C
Maximum: 56.8 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  54 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 42.5 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.143.2254041.33137.637.94037.539.15035.839.26337.638.88035.237.910035.135.212534.234.916033.135.920032.544.825031.856.831531.665.140031.164.350030.363.36303061.180031.557.3100030.564.9125029.465.9160029.166.4200028.868250028.966.9315028.467.1400028.160.1500028.161.363002869.3800027.768.41000027.765.61250027.664.21600027.559.9SPL41.377.9N4.242.7median 29.4median 64.2Delta1.86.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 15 X9Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 15 X9 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.31 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.59 / 1.09 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 26 / 30.8 / 34.9 Watt
Load midlight 90.7 / 241.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus 15 X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Aorus X5 v8
i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
34%
-2%
30%
38%
37%
Idle Minimum *
26
10.4
60%
25
4%
16
38%
8.7
67%
7.6
71%
Idle Average *
30.8
14.6
53%
31
-1%
18
42%
13
58%
13.8
55%
Idle Maximum *
34.9
16.3
53%
33
5%
23
34%
14.3
59%
14.6
58%
Load Average *
90.7
88.5
2%
102
-12%
88
3%
107.4
-18%
97.6
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
175
155.4
11%
194
-11%
120
31%
129
26%
145.8
17%
Load Maximum *
241.2
182.4
24%
239
1%
167
31%
151.5
37%
172.5
28%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
1h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
1h 35min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 01min
Aorus 15 X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh
Aorus X5 v7
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 82 Wh
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 Wh
Battery Runtime
65%
300%
303%
154%
318%
Reader / Idle
105
208
98%
682
550%
549
423%
627
497%
WiFi v1.3
95
151
59%
387
307%
382
302%
372
292%
463
387%
Load
61
84
38%
88
44%
174
185%
70
15%
103
69%

Pros

+ 锋利而有吸引力的窄边框设计
+ 满血RTX显卡
+ 144 Hz显示屏标配
+ 3个存储托架,2个SODIMM
+ 相对容易的可维护性
+ 改进了点击反馈
+ 集成小键盘
+ Microsoft Azure AI
+ MicroSD读卡器

Cons

- 电池更小; 电池续航时间很短
- CPU性能一般
- 没有单键RGB照明
- 风扇永远开启
- 没有Optimus或GSync
- 风扇时快时慢
- 游戏时噪声大
- 没有雷电3
- 较小的触控板
技嘉Aorus 15-X9 笔记本电脑评测. Test model provided by Xotic PC
技嘉Aorus 15-X9 笔记本电脑评测. Test model provided by Xotic PC

与旧款Aorus X5相比,Aorus 15有改进也有缺陷。它比上一代机型更小,更轻,更强大,运行温度更低,底盘更坚固。特别是触控板和A面的强度已经得到改进,更容易使用,并且散热更强。

但是也有一些缺点。去年的Aorus X5集成了全尺寸SD读卡器,更多存储托架,单键RGB照明,G-Sync,更大的电池,更大的触控板和专用的宏键。而较新的Aorus 15上缺少的所有这些功能有点令人失望,因为我们已经习惯了Aorus产品的发烧友级别定位,其中包括通常与高端游戏笔记本电脑相关的所有花哨和噱头。在这方面,Aorus 15位于中档和高档之间。

Aorus X5的其他方面在Aorus 15上没有任何改进。在最新的迭代中,风扇噪音,电池寿命和Thunderbolt 3的缺乏仍然缺席甚至情况更糟。RTX 2070 Max-Q相较GTX 1070性能提升约为15%到25%,具体取决于游戏和分辨率。

Aorus 15的一大优势是它的价格。特别是我们的RTX 2070 SKU在Xotic PC上售价2000美元(14000元人民币),而MSI GS65售价2100美元,Razer Blade 15售价2400美元,且只有RTX 2060。华硕ROG Scar GL504GW比Aorus 15便宜,价格为1900美元,使用相同的CPU和GPU,也是一个非常引人注目的选择。

这是迄今为止最平衡的Aorus笔记本电脑。我们希望在未来的迭代中看到重拾一些缺失的功能,例如按键RGB照明,G-Sync和雷电3,以使Aorus 15在发烧友游戏领域更有价值。”

Aorus 15 X9 - 03/26/2019 v6(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
66 / 81 → 81%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 90%
Battery
55%
Display
89%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
87 / 95 → 91%
Noise
69 / 90 → 76%
Audio
60%
Camera
40 / 85 → 46%
Average
75%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 技嘉Aorus 15 (i7-8750H, RTX 2070) 笔记本电脑评测
Allen Ngo, 2019-05-23 (Update: 2019-05-23)
Allen Ngo
Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - US Editor in Chief