对 Google Pixel 10a 的评测结论
Google Pixel 10a 是一款配置完善的中端智能手机。 在我们的评测中，它凭借明亮且色彩准确的显示屏给人留下了深刻印象——经实测，其显示效果甚至超出了官方标称的规格，非常适合户外使用。不过，该机型仍采用低频PWM调光技术。虽然Tensor G4依然是一款性能强劲的SoC，但它已在上一代机型中使用过——因此这一方面并未取得任何进步。 内存配置方面也是如此：对于一款承诺提供七年系统更新的智能手机来说，8 GB 运行内存似乎略显不足。即便是仅配备 128 GB 存储空间的入门级版本，如今也已显得有些匮乏，而升级至 256 GB 版本的溢价则相当高昂。
不过，除了长期的系统更新支持外，Pixel 10a 还以其简洁的做工给人留下深刻印象——它避免了高光元素的设计，而且很可能是唯一一款售价超过 500 欧元却没有凸起摄像头模组的智能手机。 不过，屏幕边框相当宽，这使得 Pixel 10a 看起来略显过时。
谷歌还加入了支持视频输出的USB 3.2接口，得益于内置的专用模式，这款手机可以替代台式机使用。此外，该机还通过了IP68级防水防尘认证。虽然支持eSIM，但仅限一张eSIM卡。 在大多数情况下这或许已经足够，但若能支持额外的eSIM卡会更理想，尤其是在旅行时。
5,100 mAh 的电池容量相当可观，且充电速度略有提升。测试中，其续航表现令人印象深刻，尽管比前代机型略短一些。 虽然支持无线充电，但磁吸式 PixelSnap 仍仅限于更高价位的机型。
总而言之，Google 推出的 Pixel 10a 是一款不错的中端智能手机，但其官方建议零售价过高，且与前代机型相比新增功能寥寥。 除了全新的保护玻璃和更快的充电速度外，最引人注目的新功能是卫星紧急呼叫。鉴于Pixel 10a目前即使是大容量版本售价也低于450欧元，这款手机绝对值得推荐。
Pros
Cons
规格：Google Pixel 10a
机身与功能——无摄像头凸起，支持防水
虽然 Pixel 9a 的背面几乎是平的，但 Google Pixel 10a 的背面确实是平的，或者说，甚至略微向内凹陷。做工非常出色，但屏占比还可以再高一点。
该机型的功能在同级别中相当标准，除了具备IP68级防水防尘认证外，还支持无线充电，并配备了一个高速USB 3.2接口，该接口不仅支持有线视频输出，还支持桌面模式。
通信——配备 6 GHz Wi-Fi 的 Pixel 10a
尽管谷歌 Pixel 10a 支持所有常见的蜂窝网络标准，但它仅配备一个 nano-SIM 卡槽，并支持 eSIM。至少，如果能支持双 eSIM 功能会更好。
将手机贴近耳朵通话时，通话质量良好，轻微的背景噪音也能被有效过滤；但在繁忙的街道上，这款谷歌智能手机很快就会达到其性能极限。
| Networking | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
相机——主摄像头表现不错，变焦范围非常有限
与前代机型相比，谷歌并未对 Pixel 10a 的摄像头配置进行任何调整。自拍效果非常稳定，尽管略显颗粒感。
主摄像头在日光和弱光环境下都能拍出不错的照片，超广角镜头虽然成像质量明显逊色，但表现也还算不错。谷歌依然没有配备光学变焦功能，而8倍数字变焦在变焦能力上并不突出，成像质量也难以令人满意。
| 宽高比 | 分辨率 | |
|---|---|---|
| 照片 | 4:3 / 16:9 | 12 MPix |
| 视频（主摄像头） | 16:9 | 全高清（30 / 60 FPS）超高清（30 / 60 FPS） |
| 视频（前置摄像头） | 16:9 | 全高清 (30 / 60 FPS)超高清 (30 FPS) |
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
显示屏——更亮，但仍采用PWM调光
根据规格表，Google Pixel 10a 的显示屏与 Pixel 9a的屏幕几乎完全相同，但其峰值亮度略有提升，我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。
遗憾的是，Pixel 10a 再次采用了频率较低的脉宽调制（PWM）技术来控制亮度，因此对光敏感的用户可能会感到不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 2205 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6715 K
| Google Pixel 10a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Motorola Edge 70 P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -48% | 19% | ||
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3050 | 1596 -48% | 3582 17% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2925 | 1564 -47% | 3538 21% | |
| Response Times | 28% | 21% | -137% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.42 ? | 0.64 ? 55% | 0.8 ? 44% | 3.2 ? -125% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.07 ? | 0.84 ? 21% | 0.952 ? 11% | 4.1 ? -283% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 | 90 | 120 | 180 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 14.71 | 13.58 8% | 13.45 9% | 15 -2% |
| Screen | -58% | -11% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 2205 | 1604 -27% | 1107 -50% | 1374 -38% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.9 -36% | 1 29% | 1.45 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 4.3 -87% | 2.7 -17% | 2.62 -14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.9 -81% | 1.7 -6% | 1.8 -13% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.131 103% |
| CCT | 6715 97% | 7083 92% | 6498 100% | 6391 102% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1585 | 1110 | 1333 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 97 | 95 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -26% /
-27% | 10% /
6% | -77% /
-68% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 14.71 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7791 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列（在最低亮度下，振幅曲线看起来很平坦，但这是由于缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.556 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.51 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.562 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.859 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间
| Google Pixel 10a | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | Motorola Edge 70 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 45% | 24% | 37% | -19% | 37% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1689.27 | 1977.37 17% | 2067.34 22% | 2021.5 20% | 1581 ? -6% | 2251 ? 33% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 826.38 | 1738.18 110% | 1942.35 135% | 2028.2 145% | 796 ? -4% | 1932 ? 134% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 326.53 | 409.28 25% | 366.17 12% | 299 -8% | 246 ? -25% | 310 ? -5% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 430.37 | 547.62 27% | 108.21 -75% | 387.3 -10% | 249 ? -42% | 362 ? -16% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 10a audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Motorola Edge 70 | |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Pixel 10a 凭借扎实的配置和长期的系统更新保障脱颖而出，但新功能匮乏且建议零售价过高。
Google Pixel 10a
- 06/25/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 替代方案一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.3%  | Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 549€ | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED |
2. 82.5%  | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 549€ | 210 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.83" 2800x1260 450 PPI AMOLED |
3. 85.4%  | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC11 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: $465.00 List Price: 470€ | 218 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
4. 81.3%  | Motorola Edge 70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 799€ | 159 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI P-OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
