结论 -Honor MagicPad4
通过 MagicPad 4,Honor 解决了前代产品最大的诟病--显示屏。尽管 OLED 面板是平板电脑市场上最好的面板之一,性能也与 iPad 13 Pro 相当,但Honor 平板电脑的价格还不到 iPad 13 Pro 的一半。我们的测量结果显示,它的音质甚至略好于Apple 的高端平板电脑。
任何想购买大尺寸 OLED 平板电脑的人都会发现 MagicPad 4 是一款真正物美价廉的全能型产品。强大的性能、手写笔输入和轻巧的键盘盖也使 MagicPad 4 成为中小学或大学的最佳伴侣。
我们认为,Honor 这款平板电脑没有真正的重大缺陷,尤其是对于一款中端设备而言。不过,我们对Honor 为何省略了指纹传感器感到不解--如果只是从安全角度考虑的话。不要对摄像头或电池的续航时间抱太大期望,否则它的电池容量就会很大。此外,没有卫星跟踪 5G 版本和防水外壳也在一定程度上限制了 MagicPad 4 的应用范围。游戏玩家可能也会怀念它的振动功能。
Pros
Cons
价格和供货情况 -Honor MagicPad4
Honour MagicPad 4 的基本配置(12 GB 内存、256 GB UFS 存储)建议零售价约为 599 英镑,有两种颜色可供选择。在有限的时间内,这款平板电脑在Honor 在线商店的售价为499 英镑。.
Table of Contents
- 结论 -Honor MagicPad4
- 规格 -Honor MagicPad4
- 外壳 -Android 大型平板电脑,边框纤薄
- 功能 - 配备 USB 3.2 接口的 12.3 英寸平板电脑
- 软件 -Android 平板电脑承诺长期更新
- 通信 -Honor MagicPad4 配备 WiFi 7,但不提供 5G 功能
- 相机 -Honor MagicPad4 没有超广角镜头
- 配件和保修 -Honor 平板电脑不附带充电器
- 输入设备和操作 - 支持触控笔的大型Android 平板电脑
- 显示屏 -Honor MagicPad4 的 OLED 大屏幕优于 iPad Air
- 性能 - 配备骁龙芯片组的中端平板电脑
- 排放 -Honor 平板电脑的发热量和节流很小
- 电池续航时间 -Android 平板电脑内置大容量电池
- Notebookcheck 总体评分 - MagicPad4
- 可能的替代品比较
规格 -Honor MagicPad4
外壳 -Android 大型平板电脑,边框纤薄

尽管 MagicPad 4 的尺寸为 12.3 英寸,但重量却相对较轻,仅为 450 克。Honor 平板电脑的外形纤薄,仅有不到 5 毫米,因此给人感觉非常轻薄。再加上背面的玻璃材质,MagicPad 4 给人一种高档的感觉。OLED 面板的薄边框也是如此。它的屏占比接近 91%,对于一款中端设备来说非常高效。例如,最新的 Apple iPad Air 13的屏占比仅为 86%。
Honor MagicPad 4 采用了哪种类型的保护玻璃,官方尚未透露。IP40 等级也不适合日常使用,这意味着Honor 这款平板电脑在户外使用时甚至连小雨都要受到保护。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
功能 - 配备 USB 3.2 接口的 12.3 英寸平板电脑
内部 UFS 4.0 存储无法通过 microSD 卡扩展,但借助 USB OTG 功能可以使用外置硬盘。为了实现快速数据传输,MagicPad 4 支持带宽为 5 Gbps 的 USB-C 3.2(Gen 1),并支持向外部显示器输出视频。在测试中,我们使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 实现了 658 MB/s 的出色速度。此外,还支持 NTFS 和 exFAT 文件系统。
兼容的键盘底座可通过后部的 pogo 引脚连接。
软件 -Android 平板电脑承诺长期更新
可持续性
Honor 平板电脑的包装似乎不含塑料。不过,制造商尚未提供有关包装或可持续性的任何官方信息。MagicPad 4 在 EPREL 数据库中的可修复性评级为 "C"。
通信 -Honor MagicPad4 配备 WiFi 7,但不提供 5G 功能
Honor 华硕为其中端设备配备了适用于家庭 Wi-Fi 使用的现代 WiFi 7,并支持 6 GHz 频段。在我们使用 WiFi 6E 路由器(华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000)进行的测试中,MagicPad 4 的上传速度高达 1,800 Mbps。下载速度稍慢。
MagicPad 4 既不提供移动网络连接,也不提供卫星定位跟踪功能。
| Networking | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
相机 -Honor MagicPad4 没有超广角镜头


配件和保修 -Honor 平板电脑不附带充电器
包装盒内有一条 USB-A 转 USB-C 连接线、一本快速入门指南和一张保修卡。在其在线商店Honor 上,除了电源适配器和Magic Pencil 3 之外,还提供键盘保护套等其他兼容配件。据说整个包装仅重 852 克,我们在不含触控笔的情况下测得的重量为 835 克。相比之下 iPad Pro 13包括 Magic Keyboard 在内重约 1.24 千克。
MagicPad 4 提供 24 个月的 保修
输入设备和操作 - 支持触控笔的大型Android 平板电脑
MagicPad 4 能让你用手指进行精确无延迟的操作。还可以使用 Magic Pencil 3 进行输入,它拥有 4096 级压力灵敏度。虽然在我们进行评测时还没有配备它,但我们已经通过Honor 的前代产品对这款出色的触控笔有了全面的印象。 前代产品.由于 OLED 面板的刷新率非常高,动画看起来非常流畅。不过,Honor 决定不加入振动电机。
遗憾的是,Honor 平板电脑缺少指纹传感器,这在其价格范围内再次令人费解。不过,至少通过前置摄像头实现了 2D 人脸识别功能。
显示屏 -Honor MagicPad4 的 OLED 大屏幕优于 iPad Air
与 MagicPad 32026 中端机型使用的是 OLED 面板而不是 IPS 面板,虽然屏幕也略小了一些(12.3 英寸),但像素密度几乎保持在相同的 290 ppi。165 Hz 的高刷新率也没有变化。
据制造商称,MagicPad 4 的 HDR 峰值亮度高达 2,400 尼特--对于平板电脑来说相当出色。我们很高兴在更实际的 APL 测量中也能达到如此高的亮度。使用 HDR 内容时,我们的亮度甚至超过了 3,000 d/m² 大关。
Honor 此外,我们还发现,这款平板电脑采用了 PWM 调光技术,频率为 5280 Hz,这一点我们也可以确认。此外,我们测得的基本闪烁频率非常低,仅为 60 Hz。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 829 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6601 K
| Honor MagicPad 4 OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3" | Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9" | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 IPS, 3504x2109, 13" | OnePlus Pad 2 Pro LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2" | Honor MagicPad 3 LCD, 3200x2136, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -43% | -47% | -44% | -109% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 829 | 625 -25% | 618 -25% | 691 -17% | 753 -9% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 827 | 613 -26% | 599 -28% | 643 -22% | 706 -15% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 90 | 96 7% | 92 2% | 87 -3% | 86 -4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.23 | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1.49 -66% | 1.59 -77% | 2.01 -123% | 2.3 -156% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.7 | 3.18 -87% | 3.79 -123% | 2.86 -68% | 5.9 -247% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.1 -62% | 1.7 -31% | 1.7 -31% | 4.2 -223% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.399 92% | 2.193 100% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6601 98% | 6940 94% | 6583 99% | 6615 98% | 7391 88% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1563 | 1236 | 1152 | 612 |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 16.05 % Secondary Frequency: 4999 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7832 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下的一系列测量结果(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。
使用 "正常 "色彩模式并将色温设置为 "暖色",MagicPad 4 的色彩表现非常准确,明显优于前代产品。 前代产品.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.91 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.45 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.4615 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3615 ms rise | |
| ↘ 16.24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
性能 - 配备骁龙芯片组的中端平板电脑
Honor 为其中端设备配备了 骁龙8代5的 精英称号。它的速度并不像其高通 旗舰处理器但性能仍然非常出色。MagicPad 系列取得了巨大的飞跃,尤其是在 Geekbench 多核测试中,有些分数已可媲美 Apple iPad Air 13.不过,MagicPad 4 并没有接近Apple 的 M4 芯片.
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (19736 - 24396, n=2) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Average of class Tablet (7084 - 27428, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (1289 - 2129, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 2375, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (20683 - 22592, n=2) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average of class Tablet (3564 - 76852, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (17520 - 17728, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 17728, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| Antutu v11 - Score | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (3083734 - 3282461, n=2) | |
| Average of class Tablet (522205 - 3282461, n=7, last 2 years) | |
骁龙 8 代 5 的图形计算由一个 Adreno 829.在我们要求苛刻的 GFXBench 4K 测试中,高通图形处理器达到了非常不错的每秒 44 帧的速度,这对于当前的Android 游戏来说已经足够了。不过,游戏玩家使用 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro及其 Adreno 830.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 (Safari 26) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (180.6 - 322, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 147) | |
| Average of class Tablet (35.8 - 395, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148) | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 (Chrome 139) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (39707 - 90273, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (371 - 817, n=2) | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 (Chrome 139) | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148) | |
| WebXPRT 5 - Overall | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 (Chrome 148) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Tablet (n=1last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor MagicPad 4 | Honor MagicPad 3 | Oppo Pad 4 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark for Android | -42% | 4% | -15% | -50% | |
| Storage 2.0 seq. read int. (MB/s) | 1870 ? | 1675 ? -10% | 3307 ? 77% | 2633 ? 41% | 1324 ? -29% |
| Storage 2.0 seq. write int. (MB/s) | 1747 ? | 1443 ? -17% | 2387 ? 37% | 2282 ? 31% | 1143 ? -35% |
| Storage 2.0 random read int. (MB/s) | 86.3 ? | 51.3 ? -41% | 60.1 ? -30% | 51 ? -41% | 39.3 ? -54% |
| Storage 2.0 random write int. (MB/s) | 151.5 ? | 63.9 ? -58% | 72.5 ? -52% | 80.7 ? -47% | 62.4 ? -59% |
| Storage 2.0 (Points) | 200471 ? | 31193 ? -84% | 179375 ? -11% | 79578 ? -60% | 54733 ? -73% |
排放 -Honor 平板电脑的发热量和节流很小
温度
由于表面积较大,平板电脑的散热问题比智能手机要小。 智能手机因为可以有效散热。MagicPad 4 的情况也是如此。Honor 这款中端平板电脑的最高外壳温度约为 40 °C,即使长时间使用也能保持凉爽宜人。
在 3DMark 压力测试中,我们也没有发现系统性能因发热而明显降低的情况,只观察到非常轻微的节流现象,约为 1%-5%。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
发言人
去年的大型Honor 平板电脑的优势也是 MagicPad 4 的加分项。可用空间得到了很好的利用,同时还集成了超强的八扬声器音响系统。每边都有两个高音扬声器和两个低音扬声器,在日常使用中能提供真正出色的立体声音效。
有线耳机只能通过 USB-C 端口使用,没有 3.5 毫米耳机插孔。无线方面,这款中端平板电脑支持最新的蓝牙 6.0 标准和多种音频编解码器,其中包括 LDAC 和 LHDC。
Honor MagicPad 4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 -Android 平板电脑内置大容量电池
耗电量
尽管设计纤薄,电池容量却高达 10,100 毫安时。它的最大充电功率为 67 瓦,充电速度相对较快。您可以使用合适的电源适配器或高性能的移动电源,如 小米 25000充电周期约为 1.5 小时。
对于一款配备 OLED 屏幕的 12.3 英寸平板电脑来说,耗电量不算低,但也不算高。不过,超过 3.5 瓦的闲置功耗可能会更有效。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 10100 mAh | OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 12140 mAh | Honor MagicPad 3 12450 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -42% | 15% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.53 | 3.8 -8% | 1.55 56% | 2.17 ? 39% | 2.09 ? 41% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.77 | 4.2 12% | 8.99 -88% | 3.03 ? 36% | 4.08 ? 14% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 4.86 | 4.8 1% | 9.02 -86% | 3.28 ? 33% | 4.41 ? 9% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 11.21 | 10.2 9% | 11.68 -4% | 11.5 ? -3% | 9.37 ? 16% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 11.67 | 12.4 -6% | 21.97 -88% | 15.2 ? -30% | 13.7 ? -17% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池运行时间
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,将显示屏亮度调至 150 cd/m²,MagicPad 4 的电池续航时间约为 13 小时,对于这种尺寸的平板电脑来说还算不错。不过,这款Honor 平板电脑(有点出人意料)的续航时间与前代液晶平板电脑的续航时间相差甚远。 液晶显示屏的电池续航时间。
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Honor MagicPad 4 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分 - MagicPad4
Honor MagicPad 4
- 05/22/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honor MagicPad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $250.11 Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ 8GB ... 2. $224.18 TCL NXTPAPER 11 Plus Android... 3. $435.39 Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE 25... List Price: 600€ | 450 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 12.30" 3000x1920 290 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 529€ | 598 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 13.00" 3504x2109 315 PPI IPS | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $376.19 OnePlus Pad Go 2 128GB 8GB S... 2. $259.50 XIAOMI Redmi Pad 2 PRO Only ... 3. $269.50 XIAOMI Redmi Pad 2 PRO Only ... List Price: 550€ | 675 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 13.20" 3392x2400 315 PPI LTPS LCD | |
| Apple iPad Air 13 M4 2026 Apple M4 8-Core ⎘ Apple M4 9-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe | Amazon: List Price: 849€ | 616 g | 128 GB NVMe | 12.90" 2732x2048 265 PPI IPS | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 700€ | 595 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 13.30" 3200x2136 289 PPI LCD |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.











































