廉价智能手机中的性价比之王--小米 Poco X8 Pro 评测

Name: Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

中产阶级的超级英雄

Poco X8 Pro 以低廉的价格为Android 手机提供了极高的性价比，使其成为一款真正物美价廉的手机。这款小米手机配备了强大而高效的芯片组，在电池续航时间、扬声器和明亮的 OLED 显示屏等多个方面表现出色。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 04/22/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Touchscreen Smartphone

对 Poco X8 Pro 的评价

Poco X8 Pro 继承了前代产品的优势--在经济实惠的中端市场独占鳌头。这款小米手机的最大优势之一在于其联发科（MediaTek）芯片组，它能轻松处理日常任务，甚至在 HFR 游戏等高要求任务中表现出色。

即使是 AMOLED 显示屏，其价格优势也并不明显。120 Hz 面板的峰值亮度高、显示清晰和高频 PWM 调光功能都为其加分不少。这款手机还提供一流的立体声音效和直至 2032 年的软件更新。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

批评最有可能集中在功能上。Poco X8 Pro 缺乏 eSIM 支持或无线充电等高端功能。这款中端手机还缺乏快速 Wi-Fi 和有线图像传输功能，包括桌面模式。

Pros

+ 防水外壳

+ 良好的立体声音效

+ 快速 SoC

+ 明亮锐利的 OLED 面板

+ 大容量电池

Cons

- ......但只有可靠的运行时间

- 没有 eSIM 卡

- 缺乏高级功能（6 GHz 无线局域网、无线充电......）。

- 负载情况下会出现 "节流

- 只有 USB 2.0

Poco X8 Pro 的价格和上市时间

小米 Poco X8 Pro 的零售价为 400 欧元起，可直接从小米在线商店或亚马逊等在线零售商购买。

对 Poco X8 Pro 的评价
Poco X8 Pro 的规格
手机壳 - 钢铁侠风格的小米智能手机防水壳
功能 - 价格低廉的Android 智能手机，仅有 USB 2.0 接口
软件 - Poco X8 Pro，含Android 16
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 和 WiFi 6 的中端智能手机
手机功能和语音质量 - 不带 eSIM 卡的实惠型小米智能手机
摄像头 - Poco X8 Pro 配备 OIS 和 5000 万像素摄像头
配件和保修 - 不带电源装置的中档手机
输入和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的小米智能手机
显示屏 - Poco X8 Pro 采用 OLED 和 PWM 调光技术
性能 - 价格低廉、芯片组速度快的手机
排放 - 尽量减少废热的小米智能手机
电池续航时间 -Android 快速充电和大容量电池的智能手机
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

Poco X8 Pro 的规格

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Poco X8 Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 8500 8c/8t, 1 x 3.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A725, 3 x 3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A725, 4 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A725, Cortex-A725

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G720 MP8

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.59 inch 19.56:9, 2756 x 1268 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 478 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG, Miracast, Offline Communication

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66/B70/B71), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n70/n71/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 157.5 x 75.2

Battery

6500 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.5, OIS, video @2160p/60fps) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, wide), camera2API: Full
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, video @1080p/60fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, case, info material, HyperOS 3.0, 12 Months Warranty, HDR: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision, Head SAR 0.998 W/kg, Body SAR 0.998 W/kg; Beidou: B1I + B1C + B2a | GPS: L1 + L5 | Galileo: E1 + E5a | GLONASS: G1 | QZSS: L1 + L5 | NavIC: L5; BT codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX adaptive, aptX tws+, LHDC, fanless, waterproof

Released

03/17/2026

Weight

202 g

Price

400 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

手机壳 - 钢铁侠风格的小米智能手机防水壳

Poco X8 Pro 厚度为 8.4 毫米，重量仅为 201 克，做工非常精良，即使背面仅由玻璃纤维（塑料）制成，但由于采用了金属边框，因此手感非常出色。手机外壳还通过了 IP68 防水认证。小米指定使用大猩猩 7i 玻璃作为保护玻璃。

与 vivo一样，小米在中端机型中使用了动态 RGB LED 来显示来电或通知。相机模块中的灯光效果也可用于游戏。

小米再次与漫威合作推出 Poco X8 Pro，在三种标准配色的基础上增加了钢铁侠版。这款产品不仅背部设计了金色的钢铁侠和 "斯塔克工业 "标志，十分醒目，而且还配备了定制的用户界面，包括钢铁侠外观的特殊应用图标。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro DIN A6 ❌

功能 - 价格低廉的Android 智能手机，仅有 USB 2.0 接口

Poco X8 Pro 只提供一个慢速 USB 2.0 端口，无法进行有线图像输出。不过，USB-OTG 支持连接键盘等外围设备以及 exFAT 和 NTFS 数据系统。在我们的拷贝测试中，USB 端口与三星固态硬盘 T7 的跛行传输速率达到了 24 MB/s。

其他功能还包括 NFC 芯片、Miracast 和红外线闪光灯。例如，这可以让小米智能手机充当电视的遥控器。

软件 - Poco X8 Pro，含Android 16

Poco X8 Pro 预装了Android 16 和 HyperOS 3.0。用户界面上的广告信息可能有点恼人，不过这些广告信息比起 Redmi Note 15 Pro+.

根据欧盟指令，这款经济实惠的中端手机可享受长期更新支持。软件将在四年内更新，安全补丁将在六年内更新。

可持续性

小米强调其所有智能手机普遍使用回收材料和再生塑料。不过，小米并没有提供 Poco X8 Pro 的材料或回收率的确切细节。不过，这款中端手机的包装似乎不含塑料。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 和 WiFi 6 的中端智能手机

小米智能手机能以 5G 速度访问移动数据网络，支持多种频率。4G 网络的频段配置也很吸引人。不过，由于没有 Wi-Fi 7 和 6 GHz 频段，Poco X8 Pro 在无线连接方面并不能真正面向未来。

在测试中，我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器实现了约 900 MBit/s 的平均速度。数据传输速率基本稳定。

与小米的高阶机型类似，Poco X8 Pro 支持该公司的 "离线通信"，最大距离为 1.1 公里，它将蓝牙与专有协议相结合。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	949 (min: 476) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	825 (min: 792) MBit/s ∼92%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	308 (min: 226) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	482 (min: 215) MBit/s ∼54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	214 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼22%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	364 (min: 246) MBit/s ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	860 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	752 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼84%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	965 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	899 (min: 822) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	817 (min: 214) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	824 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	694 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	738 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼82%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø933 (476-962)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø965 (877-991)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø824 (792-871)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø897 (822-924)

我们在一次短途自行车旅行中检查了定位精度，并将记录的数据与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。Poco X8 Pro 在室外的定位精度为 1 米。

路线的偏差是可以识别的，中档手机喜欢缩短路线。不过，由于采用了双频全球导航卫星系统，路线上的差异并不明显，导航也不会出现任何问题。

手机功能和语音质量 - 不带 eSIM 卡的实惠型小米智能手机

Poco X8 Pro 支持 VoNR、VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话，但没有集成 eSIM 卡。只有两张 nano SIM 卡才能实现双卡双待。

小米手机具有良好的语音质量，包括可靠的噪音抑制。

摄像头 - Poco X8 Pro 配备 OIS 和 5000 万像素摄像头

Poco X8 Pro 的主摄像头采用了索尼 IMX882，像素为 5000 万像素，配备 OIS。传感器具有开放式 f/1.51 光圈，但尺寸不是特别大，只有 1.95 英寸。不过，这一缺点在日光下并不明显。照片具有良好的动态范围和清晰度，令人赏心悦目。A Galaxy S26+就无法提供更多细节。

由于采用了大光圈，因此在弱光环境下也能获得不错的效果，但这要归功于较长的快门释放时间。虽然橙色和黄色的色调非常明亮，但色彩还原的准确度在同价位的相机中已属上乘。

虽然没有长焦镜头，但可以使用传感器裁剪功能无损变焦 2 倍；不过，这种传感器模式只有在光线条件非常好的情况下才能真正使用。800 万像素的低分辨率超广角摄像头也是如此。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low Light Zoom 5x Ultra wide-angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - 不带电源装置的中档手机

我们特殊机型的收藏盒内有一个保护盖、一个用于弹出 SIM 卡的工具、一本用户手册（包括保修单）、一张预装保护膜和一根数据线。

保修保修保修期为 12 个月，通过制造商商店购买时还可享受小米公司的贴心服务（39 欧元起）。

输入和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的小米智能手机

据小米公司称，6.59 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏上的输入可以精确无延迟地执行，这要归功于高达 480 Hz 的高轮询率，在游戏模式下甚至可以达到 2,560 Hz。显示屏内的光学传感器可用于生物识别解锁。在测试中，指纹识别工作可靠、快速。

通过线性振动电机（X 轴）提供的触觉反馈非常精确，在同价位产品中很有吸引力。

显示屏 - Poco X8 Pro 采用 OLED 和 PWM 调光技术

120 Hz AMOLED 面板分辨率为 1268p，像素密度高达 460 ppi。在测试（APL18）中，我们几乎完全达到了宣传的峰值亮度 3,500 尼特，在播放 HDR 视频时，Poco X8 Pro 也达到了非常接近的 3,406 cd/m²。

为了尽量减少 OLED 带来的问题，如屏幕闪烁导致的眼睛疲劳或头痛，小米采用了高频 PWM 调光技术（制造商规格：3840 Hz），我们在测量中也证实了这一点。不过，基本的闪烁频率仅为 120 Hz。根据小米的说法，在高亮度水平下会使用直流调光。


1089 cd/m²	1090 cd/m²	1114 cd/m²
1088 cd/m²	1104 cd/m²	1124 cd/m²
1090 cd/m²	1100 cd/m²	1122 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1124 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1102.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1104 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6472 K

	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro AMOLED, 2756x1268, 6.6"	Motorola Edge 70 Fusion AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen		-5%	-51%	-10%	8%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1104	1501 36%	1155 5%	1127 2%	1034 -6%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1102	1476 34%	1136 3%	1137 3%	1041 -6%
Brightness Distribution (%)	97	96 -1%	97 0%	98 1%	97 0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	1.52 -27%	2.42 -102%	1.8 -50%	1 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.4	3.47 -45%	5.63 -135%	2.8 -17%	2.2 8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	2.6 -24%	3.7 -76%	2.1 -0%	1.4 33%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.184 ^101%	2.246 ^98%	2.11 ^104%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6472 ^100%	6444 ^101%	7263 ^89%	6466 ^101%	6553 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3775 cd/m² +9%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3475 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1953 cd/m² -44%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1877 cd/m² -46%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1372 cd/m² -61%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3685 cd/m² +8%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3406 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2922 cd/m² -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2824 cd/m² -17%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2012 cd/m² -41%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 16.04 %
Secondary Frequency: 2777 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7901 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

使用 "原始 "配置文件，我们在 sRGB 色彩空间的测量中实现了最精确的色彩还原。灰度也显示出非常低的 DeltaE 值，与参考数据几乎没有任何明显的差异。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5245 ms rise
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.529 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5685 ms rise
1.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5415 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms).

即使在平面角度下，AMOLED 屏幕的可视角度也很稳定。Poco X8 Pro 在户外很容易阅读，但光面屏幕上的反光会影响可读性。

性能 - 价格低廉、芯片组速度快的手机

钛 Dimensity 8500-Ultra中端手机中的 Dimensity 8500-Ultra 可提供同价位手机中的一流性能。联发科 SoC 在很大程度上兑现了这一承诺，尽管采用了主频更高的高性能内核（Cortex-A725），但在 Geekbench 中的单核成绩却与前代产品相当。前代的 Poco X7 Pro的单核成绩相当，远低于制造商的参考值。

在日常使用中，系统运行非常流畅。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=192, last 2 years)	1806 Points +15%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (1564 - 1728, n=2)	1646 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1598 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1564 Points
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	1171 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1050 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	1033 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (6478 - 6762, n=2)	6620 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	6478 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	6239 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=192, last 2 years)	5363 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	3309 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	2955 Points -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2939 Points -55%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	16598 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	16598 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=156, last 2 years)	15118 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	14805 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	13662 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	12811 Points -23%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1287 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1287 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	1287 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=104, last 2 years)	1204 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	877 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	753 Points -41%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9423 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	9423 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	8278 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=126, last 2 years)	7856 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	5002 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	4532 Points -52%
System
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=126, last 2 years)	11509 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	11003 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	11003 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	10865 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	8761 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	8445 Points -23%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	10367 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	10367 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=126, last 2 years)	8982 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	8484 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	4953 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	4632 Points -55%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	39353 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	39353 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	36491 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=126, last 2 years)	27223 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8704 Points -78%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	8011 Points -80%
Web
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1785 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	1785 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=126, last 2 years)	1732 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1731 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	1452 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1402 Points -21%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	51276 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	51276 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	49010 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=114, last 2 years)	20390 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8301 Points -84%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	8253 Points -84%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	29976 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	29976 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	29244 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=92, last 2 years)	17599 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	587 Points -98%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	921 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	921 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=92, last 2 years)	716 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	571 Points -38%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	235 Points -74%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	7194 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	7194 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=92, last 2 years)	2917 Points -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1329 Points -82%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	235 Points -97%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9298 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	9298 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=92, last 2 years)	4282 Points -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2645 Points -72%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	547 Points -94%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1181 Points
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=32, last 2 years)	586 Points
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=79, last 2 years)	5241 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	5141 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	4709 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	4709 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	540 Points -89%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	299 Points -94%

集成 Mali-G720 MP8比 Poco X8 Pro 的图形处理器多一个核心。前代产品性能略有提升。不过，更有趣的是中端产品的竞争情况。小米手机在 GFXBench 4K 测试中达到了近 30 帧/秒，而摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Fusion甚至连 10 帧/秒都达不到。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4304 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3691 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1114 Points -74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1012 Points -76%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	901 Points -79%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4311 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3840 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1148 Points -73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1010 Points -77%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	907 Points -79%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14679 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12261 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4297 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3502 Points -76%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6358 Points +804%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	703 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6277 Points +782%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	712 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1529 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1333 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	404 Points -74%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1563 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1272 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	405 Points -74%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	90 fps -25%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	575 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	568 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	126 fps -78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 fps -79%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	243 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	223 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88 fps -61%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps -66%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps -65%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	199 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	198 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps -69%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -72%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	88 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -72%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	122 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	113 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps -68%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -73%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	73 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	71 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -68%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20.3 fps -71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -73%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	64 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 fps -5%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19.1 fps -70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps -73%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps -75%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	111 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -65%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -72%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	163 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	153 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -71%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps -73%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	29 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	28 fps -3%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8.9 fps -69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.4 fps -74%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.1 fps -76%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=124, last 2 years)	155.4 Points
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (Chrome 146)	152.9 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	139.947 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	131.654 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	112.67 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=95, last 2 years)	242 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	192 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	123 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	105 runs/min

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=107, last 2 years)	15 runs/min +8%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	13.9 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	13.9 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	11.7 runs/min -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	7.49 runs/min -46%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	6.94 runs/min -50%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	144 Points
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=115, last 2 years)	140.7 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	127 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	112 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	62098 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	62098 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=160, last 2 years)	50382 Points -19%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	47146 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	38676 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	38099 Points -39%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=134, last 2 years)	1094 ms * -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	1072.9 ms * -31%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	1031.23 ms * -25%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	882.5 ms * -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (n=1)	822 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro (Chrome 146)	821.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro	Motorola Edge 70 Fusion	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		55%	-1%	-60%	-21%	88%	31%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3576.86	2049.4 -43%	945 -74%	968.34 -73%	3969.01 11%	3704 ?(1954 - 4366, n=32) 4%	2207 ?(270 - 4370, n=175, last 2 years) -38%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3565.14	1825.9 -49%	837.4 -77%	166.77 -95%	1813.29 -49%	3183 ?(339 - 4113, n=32) -11%	1883 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=175, last 2 years) -47%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	324.76	351.2 8%	184 -43%	233.98 -28%	362.61 12%	402 ?(279 - 614, n=32) 24%	302 ?(47.6 - 614, n=175, last 2 years) -7%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	112.05	452.1 303%	326.1 191%	62.58 -44%	49.17 -56%	486 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=32) 334%	354 ?(9.4 - 1071, n=175, last 2 years) 216%

排放 - 尽量减少废热的小米智能手机

温度

在负载情况下，表面温度并不明显，这让人更加惊讶于 Dimensity 8500-Ultra确实大幅降低了性能。在 3DMark 压力测试中，Poco X8 Pro 的性能降低了约 20% 至 25%。

Max. Load

Idle


42.5 °C	41.8 °C	40.7 °C
41.9 °C	40.3 °C	39.2 °C
40.9 °C	40.8 °C	38.1 °C

Maximum: 42.5 °C
Average: 40.7 °C


36.8 °C	37.9 °C	39.9 °C
36.7 °C	37.6 °C	40.3 °C
35.1 °C	38.1 °C	37.6 °C

Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 37.8 °C

Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % +30%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97.7 % +28%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	76.4 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 % -29%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % +34%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % +33%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90.4 % +22%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	74.4 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.9 % -25%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	82 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	38.1 % -54%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 % +31%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	75.4 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	72 % -5%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø19.6 (18-24.2)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.7 (13.1-23.4)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø62 (58.2-76.2)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.6 (42-77.8)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.7 (63.9-87.1)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73.8 (70.8-80.4)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø18.4 (17.3-22)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø17.4 (10.8-20.6)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø18.3 (17.7-21.5)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø17.6 (7.64-20)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø9.13 (8.51-11.3)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.33 (7.22-10)

发言人

对于经济实惠的中频扬声器来说，立体声扬声器确实不错。我们的粉红噪声测量显示出线性的中音和高音。声音中还有明显的低音。此外，还可通过 USB 或蓝牙 6.0 无线连接耳机。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Android 快速充电和大容量电池的智能手机

耗电量

在我们的功耗测量中，Poco X8 Pro 的效率相当高。其中一个原因应该是它采用了 OLED 显示屏，根据制造商的说法，它比上一代产品省电 20%。

电池容量为 6,500 毫安时，充电功率高达 100 瓦，充电时间约为 50 分钟。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.13 / 0.41 Watt
Idle	0.97 / 1.19 / 1.28 Watt
Load	5.99 / 10.53 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 6500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 6000 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-7%	-14%	-12%	0%	-12%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.97	1.2 -24%	0.86 11%	1.07 -10%	0.97 ?(n=1) -0%	0.869 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=141, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.19	1.5 -26%	1.75 -47%	1.29 -8%	1.19 ?(n=1) -0%	1.455 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=141, last 2 years) -22%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.28	1.9 -48%	1.82 -42%	1.36 -6%	1.28 ?(n=1) -0%	1.641 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=141, last 2 years) -28%
Load Average * (Watt)	5.99	4 33%	5.31 11%	6.14 -3%	5.99 ?(n=1) -0%	6.77 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=111, last 2 years) -13%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	10.53	7.4 30%	10.95 -4%	13.94 -32%	10.5 ?(n=1) -0%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=111, last 2 years) -7%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.17 (1.331-11.2)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.41 (1.653-15.5)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.072 (0.991-1.47)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.12 (1.016-1.408)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.3-11)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.8 (11.8-15)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.072 (0.991-1.47)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.12 (1.016-1.408)

电池寿命

在我们的 WLAN 测试中，大容量电池在显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的实际条件下实现了良好的运行时间，尽管我们对 Poco X7 Pro 的数值期望更高一些。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 146)		19h 24min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro 6500 mAh	19.4 h
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion 7000 mAh	24.5 h
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh	30.5 h
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh	14.8 h
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 6000 mAh	19.7 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Poco X8 Pro 为那些希望省钱的人提供了超值的选择。尽管价格低廉，但在功能和性能上却无需妥协。不过，高级功能并不包括在内。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro - 04/18/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

49 / 69 → 71%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

91%

Games Performance

42 / 55 → 76%

Application Performance

71 / 85 → 84%

AI Performance

73%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 87%

Camera

74%

Average

71%

84%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
35%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
93.6%

Repairability
51%

Software Updates
78%

Total Sustainability Score: 55.4%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 83.8%	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	List Price: 400€	202 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.59" 2756x1268 460 PPI AMOLED
2. 77.4%	Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 420€	193 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED
3. 77.6%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: List Price: 400€	210 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED
4. 78%	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 379€	195 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED
5. 80.9%	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	List Price: 430€	198 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

廉价智能手机中的性价比之王--小米 Poco X8 Pro 评测

中产阶级的超级英雄

对 Poco X8 Pro 的评价

Pros

Cons

Poco X8 Pro 的价格和上市时间

Table of Contents

Poco X8 Pro 的规格

手机壳 - 钢铁侠风格的小米智能手机防水壳

尺寸比较

功能 - 价格低廉的Android 智能手机，仅有 USB 2.0 接口

软件 - Poco X8 Pro，含Android 16

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 和 WiFi 6 的中端智能手机

手机功能和语音质量 - 不带 eSIM 卡的实惠型小米智能手机

摄像头 - Poco X8 Pro 配备 OIS 和 5000 万像素摄像头

配件和保修 - 不带电源装置的中档手机

输入和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的小米智能手机

显示屏 - Poco X8 Pro 采用 OLED 和 PWM 调光技术

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 价格低廉、芯片组速度快的手机

排放 - 尽量减少废热的小米智能手机

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro audio analysis

电池续航时间 -Android 快速充电和大容量电池的智能手机

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可比较的替代品

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles