联想 Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 的评价
联想 Idea Tab Pro 2 是一款成功的带笔输入创意平板电脑的新版本。它拥有更大的 13 英寸屏幕、更强劲的动力和更快的 WiFi。不过，与上一代产品相比，重量明显减轻，平板电脑也变得更加轻薄。另一方面，电池容量没有变化。
金属机身采用了高品质的表面处理，看起来非常时尚。此外，还配备了一个 microSD 插槽。
通过 WiFi 7，Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 在我们的测试中实现了非常快的传输速率。显示屏亮度有所提高，我们也喜欢它比上一代产品更好的色彩还原能力。
不过，与同类产品相比，运行时间可能会更好，而且摄像头更适合拍摄快照。更新周期也相当短。
Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 是一款适合媒体消费的高品质平板电脑，但由于它支持手写笔，因此也适合创意活动。新处理器使其速度明显快于前代产品，但价格也明显上涨。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
联想 Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 可通过Lenovo India 购买。欧洲和其他地区。
在撰写本评论时，在线零售商也开始销售这款平板电脑。
- $322.52Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Google Gemini - Student Tablet - 12.7” 3K LCD Display - 8 GB Memory - 128 GB Storage - MediaTek Dimensity 8300 - Includes Pen and Folio Case
- $309.99Lenovo Idea Tab Pro TB373FU Tablet - 12.7" 3K - MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Octa-core - 8 GB - 128 GB Storage - Android 14 - Luna Gray - Cortex A715 Single-core (1 Core) 3.35 GHz + Cortex A715 Triple-core
- $329.00Lenovo Tabet P11 Pro Gen 2 11.2? 2.5K (2560 x 1536) OLED, Glossy, Anti-Fingerprint, Touchscreen 4 GB LPDDR4X Memory 128 GB Storage ZAB50141US (Renewed)
规格
外壳和功能 - 超薄金属
联想对第二代 Idea Tab Pro 的外形进行了瘦身：现在，不含摄像头模块，它的尺寸仅为 6.2 毫米。同时，屏幕增大到 13 英寸。屏幕边缘相当纤薄，因此从正面看这款平板电脑非常时尚。
有三种颜色可供选择：浅灰、深灰和浅蓝。不过，并非所有颜色在所有市场都有供应。
另一项新功能是 IP52 认证，保证了适当的防尘保护。不过，超过几滴水就不太好了。机身做工精良，性能稳定。
欧洲市场上的所有机型都配备了 8GB 内存，并有 128GB 或 256GB 的大容量存储空间可供选择。该机还配备了 microSD 插槽，这在同类产品中通常是没有的。它读写存储卡的速度也相当快。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 57.4, n=44, last 2 years) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信和操作 - 使用手写笔的快速屏幕
第二代 Idea Tab Pro 配备了 WiFi 7，因此在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器和我们的新产品华硕 RT-BE96U BE19000 进行的测试中达到了非常快的传输速度：接收性能可以超过 2 GBit/s，因此对于快速的家庭网络也有足够的速度。
遗憾的是，它没有移动网络选项，但可以通过大平板电脑进行卫星定位。
触摸屏可以非常精确地操作，在角落里也是如此。120 Hz 的屏幕也能快速处理输入。虽然前代产品有指纹传感器，但现在已经没有了。因此，你只能通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，这在测试中运行稳定，但并不那么安全。
Idea Tab Pro G2 还支持联想的 Tab Pen Plus。它可以通过磁力吸附在平板电脑的顶部，但必须通过 USB 充电。此外，笔上只有一个按钮。可以进行精细绘图。
| Networking | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 - 仅四年的安全保障
Android 16 预装在平板电脑上。制造商承诺更新至Android 18，并提供四年的安全补丁，即直到 2030 年。这是合理的，但远低于欧盟对新设备的要求。
联想为其平板电脑配备了多项人工智能功能：例如，您可以快速、轻松地将文件传输到联想记事本，然后圈出区域，由人工智能重新表述、总结或解释。您还可以通过人工智能提高图片的分辨率或对其进行修改。
相机 - 缺乏活力
主摄像头是一个简单的 1300 万像素传感器。这意味着动态范围和细节清晰度还有待提高。不过，在光线良好的情况下，该摄像头足以拍摄简单的快照或文件扫描。
自拍摄像头能拍出不错的自拍照，但也缺乏动态效果。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
显示屏 - 快速、明亮且无 PWM
Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 的 IPS 屏幕具有在低亮度水平下工作时不会出现 PWM 闪烁的巨大优势。与上一代产品相比，它的亮度明显提高，现在达到了约 600 cd/m²。
我们还喜欢其较低的黑度，这使得色彩显得更加明亮，同时也喜欢其色彩还原性，只是有点太暗了。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 618 cd/m²
Contrast: 1236:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.59 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.399
CCT: 6583 K
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 IPS, 3504x2109, 13" | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7" | OnePlus Pad 2 Pro LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2" | Honor MagicPad 3 LCD, 3200x2136, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -55% | -2% | -51% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 618 | 409 -34% | 691 12% | 753 22% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 599 | 388 -35% | 643 7% | 706 18% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 92 | 89 -3% | 87 -5% | 86 -7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.5 | 0.4 20% | 0.6 -20% | 1.23 -146% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1236 | 1023 -17% | 1152 -7% | 612 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.59 | 3.46 -118% | 2.01 -26% | 2.3 -45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.79 | 5.46 -44% | 2.86 25% | 5.9 -56% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 5.2 -206% | 1.7 -0% | 4.2 -147% |
| Gamma | 2.399 92% | 2.106 104% | 2.193 100% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6583 99% | 5823 112% | 6615 98% | 7391 88% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7879 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命--为大型平板电脑提供更多动力
......（英文 Tab Pro功能并不强大，联想希望通过第二代产品改变这一状况，并安装了 高通 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4这实际上是一款顶级 SoC。
性能确实有了明显的飞跃，尤其是在使用更复杂的应用程序或游戏时。
说到内存，需要注意的是，128 GB 版本安装的是 UFS 3.1，而速度更快的 UFS 4.0 只用于 256 GB。
长时间加载后，机身外壳会明显发热，但幸运的是，这种情况在本地非常有限。在几次基准测试运行后，你不得不忍受 10% 左右的节流，但与其他 SoC 相比，这个数值已经很低了。
外壳中的四个扬声器能发出相当响亮和饱满的声音。一些低频也清晰可闻。许多蓝牙编解码器可用于无线音频播放。
与上一代产品相比，联想没有改变 10,200 毫安时的电池，但在 WLAN 测试中，该平板电脑的电池续航时间仍可延长约 50 分钟。平板电脑的最大充电功率为 45 瓦，但不包括充电器。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 (233 - 245, n=4) | |
| Average of class Tablet (35.8 - 395, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | Honor MagicPad 3 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 64% | 37% | -37% | -18% | ||
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1912.4 | 3648.3 91% | 3864.83 102% | 1580 ? -17% | 1919 ? 0% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1852.7 | 3298.5 78% | 3317.21 79% | 795 ? -57% | 1511 ? -18% | |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 347.8 | 474.4 36% | 303.59 -13% | 245 ? -30% | 263 ? -24% | |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 438.3 | 668 52% | 345.84 -21% | 247 ? -44% | 303 ? -31% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| OnePlus Pad 2 Pro | |
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
| Honor MagicPad 3 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Honor MagicPad 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 10200 mAh | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 10200 mAh | OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 12140 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -6% | 67% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14.2 | 13.3 -6% | 23.7 67% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 25.4 | 46.6 | |
| H.264 (h) | 17 | 24.4 | |
| Load (h) | 4.3 | 4.8 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 在前代产品的基础上进行了合理而全面的改进。不过，联想平板电脑的价格也明显提高了。
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2
- 05/05/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.5%  | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: List Price: 529€ | 598 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 13.00" 3504x2109 315 PPI IPS |
2. 82.3%  | Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: List Price: 379€ | 620 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS |
3. 88.4%  | OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $300.95 OnePlus Pad Go 2 128GB 8GB S... 2. $643.99 OnePlus Pad 3 Storm Blue, ... 3. $259.50 XIAOMI Redmi Pad 2 PRO Only ... List Price: 550€ | 675 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 13.20" 3392x2400 315 PPI LTPS LCD |
4. 85.9%  | Honor MagicPad 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $811.49 Honor MagicPad3 Wi-Fi Tablet... 2. $643.99 OnePlus Pad 3 Storm Blue, ... 3. $490.61 Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ 1... List Price: 700€ | 595 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 13.30" 3200x2136 289 PPI LCD |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
