Notebookcheck Logo
Honor MagicPad3 平板电脑回顾。(图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

Honor MagicPad3 评测：巧妙的扬声器和超长电池续航时间的 13.3 英寸平板电脑

带笔和键盘的完整解决方案。

Honor MagicPad3 凭借其明亮的 XXL 屏幕、强劲的音质和超长的电池续航时间脱颖而出。尽管如此，Android ，2025 年的平板电脑市场确实正在提速。请阅读我们的评测，看看与强劲的竞争对手相比，大尺寸 MagicPad3 是否物有所值。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

结论良好的生产力平板电脑，但也有一些不足之处

如果您正在寻找一款具有强大音频功能的大型平板电脑，MagicPad3 可能是您在大学或学校的理想伴侣。

卓越的运行时间和出色的手写笔输入功能也是Honor 这款优质平板电脑的优势所在。

不过，遗憾的是，MagicPad3 也有不少 "缺点"，尤其是对于目标价位而言。首先，在显示屏方面有明显的妥协。

这并不是因为制造商现在使用的是液晶显示屏，而是因为其他中端平板电脑的屏幕质量更好，例如Galaxy Tab S10 FE+、Oppo Pad 4 Pro 或 OnePlus Pad 3。后两者同样采用旗舰处理器，价格也更便宜。

在第三代 MagicPad 的功能列表中，我们还看到了一些不足之处。一方面，我们缺少 GPS 和蜂窝网络选项，另一方面，我们认为指纹传感器是这个价位的必备功能。

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 轻薄设计
+ 无 PWM 的明亮面板
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 性能卓越

Cons

- 对比度低
- 更新时间打问号
- 没有导航选项
- 没有蜂窝电话选项
- 无指纹传感器、耳机插孔或内存扩展

Honor MagicPad3 的价格和上市时间

Honor MagicPad3 迄今只在英国正式上市，零售价为 599.99 英镑（约合 700 欧元或 819 美元）。

根据我们获得的信息，MagicPad3 要到明年才会在德国上市。其他欧洲国家的计划则更早。

Amazon Logo
$99.99
JZCZMCE Keyboard Case for Honor MagicPad 13-inch, Magnetic Floating Cantilever Stand, Ultra-Slim Protective Case with Backlit Keyboard, Multi-Touch Trackpad
  • $16.99
    Clear Case for Honor MagicPad 3 Tablet 13.3 inch,WUNIKA Airbag Drop-Proof Design Thin Slim Lightweight Scratch Proof,Durable Protection Silicone Rubber TPU Cover (Clear).
  • $33.99
    Magnetic Detachable Wireless Keyboard & Mouse Combo with Leather Cover for Honor Pad MagicPad 2 12.3-inch Tablet – Full Wrapped Protection Keyboard Case (Blue,Normal and Mouse)

MagicPad3 拥有Honor 迄今为止平板电脑系列中最大的屏幕。13.3 英寸液晶显示屏的宽高比为 3:2，因此适合高效工作。

MagicPad3 配有键盘保护套（包括触控板）和 MagicOS 9 的扩展多任务处理功能，还可作为具有触摸功能的笔记本电脑替代品，满足大学日常生活和工作需要。

Honor MagicPad3 的规格

Honor MagicPad 3
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
13.30 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 289 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, LCD, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 549 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-Type-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, proximity, gyro, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.79 x 293.88 x 201.38
Battery
12450 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (F/2.0, AF)+2 MPix (macro, F/2.4), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 9 MPix (F/2.2, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: 8 speakers , charger, USB cable, info material, MagicOS 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, aptX, aptX HD, fanless
Weight
595 g, Power Supply: 91 g
Price
700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳：超薄Android 平板电脑

Honor MagicPad3 颜色选项
Honor MagicPad3 颜色选项

Honor MagicPad3 的机身纤薄，高度仅为 5.8 毫米，重量也相对较轻，仅为 595 克。不过，这很可能是以塑料背壳为代价换来的--至少手感是这样--对于这个价位的设备来说，这一点值得商榷。

虽然做工质量不错，但整体感觉不如采用金属一体式机身设计的机型，如 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro或玻璃结构机型（如 三星Galaxy Tab S10 Plus.

窄屏幕边缘确保了现代外观和高达 89% 的屏占比。制造商没有提供关于显示屏玻璃防护等级的任何信息。

选配的 Magic-Pencil 3 可以通过磁力牢固地吸附在外壳上。不过，外壳没有 IP 认证。

尺寸比较

❌
300.6 mm 194.7 mm 6 mm 664 g293.88 mm 201.38 mm 5.79 mm 595 g289.6 mm 209.6 mm 5.97 mm 675 g289.6 mm 198.3 mm 5.9 mm 578 g274.5 mm 180.5 mm 5.8 mm 555 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能特点配备 USB 3.2 的快速平板电脑

MagicPad3 配备了一个 USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-C 端口。这不仅能实现快速数据传输，还能将图像输出到外部显示器。还可以通过 Miracast 进行无线连接。

在拷贝测试中，我们使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 实现了 703 MB/s 的快速传输速度。 三星便携式固态硬盘 T7.连接的存储介质可以格式化为 NTFS 或 exFAT，以便使用。MagicPad3 没有 microSD 读卡器，因此无法扩展内部存储器。

软件： Honor MagicPad3 与Android 15

安装的操作系统是Honor 基于Android 15 的 MagicOS 9 界面。MagicPad3 还专注于人工智能工具，以提高生产力和创造力。它还可以在智能手机和笔记本电脑之间实现无线文件和信息传输，Honor 。

Honor 但没有提供任何有关更新时间的信息。与 MagicPad2的前身一样，MagicPad3 每季度都会收到安全更新。

MagicPad3 也未列入欧洲EPREL 数据库。.

Honor MagicPad3：MagicOS 9 主屏幕
Honor MagicPad3：MagicOS 9 主屏幕
设置页面
设置页面
快速设置
快速设置

可持续性

目前还没有关于 MagicPad3 可持续发展的具体信息。虽然包装盒在运输过程中用铝箔包裹，但似乎不使用塑料。

通信：机载 Wi-Fi 7，但没有 GPS 或蜂窝电话

MagicPad3 支持 2x2 MIMO 快速 Wi-Fi 7，但不使用 6 GHz 6E 频段。这限制了华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 Wi-Fi 6E 路由器的最大传输速度。

Honor 平板电脑在 5 GHz 频段的数据传输速率低于 1,000 MBit/s。

MagicPad3 没有集成 GPS 模块的蜂窝版本，这意味着无法使用 5G 移动互联网或定位/导航功能。

Networking
Honor MagicPad 3
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
721 (min: 670) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
974 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼57%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
878 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1723 (min: 1322) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
534 (min: 376) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1687 (min: 1532) MBit/s ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
780 (min: 711) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
829 (min: 431) MBit/s ∼48%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
867 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
937 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼54%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
951 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1112 (min: 755) MBit/s ∼65%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
537 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
602 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼35%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000Tooltip
Honor MagicPad 3 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø720 (670-743)
Honor MagicPad 2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (453-934)
Honor MagicPad 3 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø974 (866-1011)
Honor MagicPad 2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (892-952)

相机 Honor MagicPad3 配备双摄像头

使用Honor Magic Pad3 的 900 万像素前置摄像头自拍
使用Honor Magic Pad3 的 900 万像素前置摄像头自拍

在日光下，MagicPad3 及其 1300 万像素主摄像头拍摄的照片效果尚可。镜头和自动对焦的清晰度和色彩还原令人满意。在我们对人造光源下的色彩分析中，MagicPad3 几乎没有发现任何异常值（DeltaE > 10）。

平板电脑是否需要配备微距摄像头还有待观察，但使用Honor 平板电脑拍摄小文件是可能的，即使分辨率只有区区 200 万像素。总体而言，笔记或脚本的数字化质量令人满意。

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10倍（最大值）
10倍（最大值）
宏观
宏观

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain CameraLow LightZoom 5x
ColorChecker
7.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
0.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor MagicPad 3: 7.02 ∆E min: 0.83 - max: 12.38 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
92 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor MagicPad 3: 46.65 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 92.01 ∆E

附件和保修：Honor 提供电源适配器

MagicPad3 的 Magic-Pencil 3
MagicPad3 的 Magic-Pencil 3

我们的测试样品还附带了一个电源适配器，尽管这不是正式销售版本。包装盒内还有一根 USB 数据线和信息资料。

MagicPad3 和 Magic-Pencil 3 的配套键盘盖（RRP：100 欧元）必须单独购买。

Honor 提供 24 个月保修。平板电脑提供 24 个月保修。

MagicPad3 的可选键盘
MagicPad3 的可选键盘

输入设备和操作：MagicPad3 不带指纹传感器

通过触摸和功能非常强大的 Magic-Pencil 3（具有 4096 级压力），可以实现精确操作。据Honor 称，Magic-Pencil 3 的延迟会因使用的平板电脑型号而异。

得益于高达 165 Hz 的高刷新率，输入的实现毫无延迟。MagicPad3 没有用于触觉的振动电机。

为了扩展输入选项，MagicPad3 背面有三个 Pogo 针，可用于连接选配的键盘底座，但目前只有 QWERTY 布局。

Honor 这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器，考虑到其价格区间，这一点其实并不难理解。但至少通过前置摄像头进行的 2D 人脸识别功能要比高级平板电脑（如 Oppo Pad 4 Pro和 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro.

解锁工作可靠、快速，但与电源按钮上的传感器相比仍不安全。

Honor MagicPad3横向键盘
Honor MagicPad3横向键盘
风景键盘
风景键盘
纵向模式
纵向模式

显示屏液晶面板，无 PWM

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

MagicPad3 的 13.3 英寸面板其实应该是旗舰平板电脑的亮点，但遗憾的是它并非如此。竞争对手的分辨率比 MagicPad3 更清晰，但略低的 2,136p 分辨率和 289 ppi 的像素密度在日常使用中并不一定明显。

不过，与 MagicPad2不同，MagicPad3 不再使用 OLED 面板，而是采用了 LCD。这并不一定是一个主要的缺点，因为 MagicPad3 不需要 PWM，因此敏感的用户即使长时间使用也不会感到疲劳，但面板的质量并不能让我们信服。

黑色值为 1.23 cd/m²（APL18：1.18 cd/m²），黑色色调显得比较灰暗，对比度低于平均水平，约为 1:600。面板的照明也不均匀。

根据Honor 的说法，在明亮的环境中或显示 HDR 内容时，应该可以达到所宣传的 1,000 尼特峰值亮度，但我们无法证实这两点。

在我们的亮度测量中，MagicPad3 的最高亮度为 748 cd/m²（APL18）和 753 cd/m²（HDR），与同类产品相比仍是不错的数值。

693
cd/m²		668
cd/m²		648
cd/m²
710
cd/m²		753
cd/m²		681
cd/m²
746
cd/m²		738
cd/m²		720
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 753 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 706.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.56 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 753 cd/m²
Contrast: 612:1 (Black: 1.23 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
CCT: 7391 K
Honor MagicPad 3
LCD, 3200x2136, 13.3"		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"		Vivo Pad 5 Pro
IPS, 3096x2064, 13"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
TFT-LCD, 2880x1800, 13.1"		Honor MagicPad 2
OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"
Screen
27%
35%
43%
26%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
753
672
-11%
683
-9%
779
3%
645
-14%
Brightness (cd/m²)
706
652
-8%
668
-5%
751
6%
650
-8%
Brightness Distribution (%)
86
93
8%
94
9%
90
5%
94
9%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
1.23
0.46
63%
0.5
59%
0.43
65%
Contrast (:1)
612
1461
139%
1366
123%
1812
196%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
3.18
-38%
1.9
17%
1.9
17%
1.3
43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.9
4.84
18%
3.42
42%
5
15%
2.1
64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
2.2
48%
2.4
43%
2.7
36%
1.5
64%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.396 92%
2.378 93%
2.2 100%
2.25 98%
CCT
7391 88%
7070 92%
6867 95%
6923 94%
6658 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8253 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们使用 Portrait Displays 公司的 Calman Ultimate 分析软件和照相光谱仪对 MagicPad3 进行了色彩校准。

有两种配置文件可供选择，还可以选择手动白平衡。与 sRGB 色彩空间的偏差不大，但略高于同类产品。MagicPad3 的灰阶偏色也很明显。

色彩精确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，标准）
色彩精确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，标准）
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，标准）
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，标准）
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，标准）
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB，配置文件：正常，标准）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
13.73 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.168 ms rise
↘ 10.56 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.128 ms rise
↘ 19.34 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).

即使在夏末的室外条件下，液晶面板仍有足够的可读性，但必须避免玻璃表面的反光。液晶面板的视角稳定性几乎没有什么值得批评的地方。

Honor MagicPad3：户外观赏
Honor MagicPad3：户外观赏
Honor MagicPad3：户外观赏
Honor MagicPad3：稳定的视角
Honor MagicPad3：稳定的视角
Honor MagicPad3：稳定的视角

性能：Honor 依靠骁龙 8 代 3

Honor 的高端平板电脑并不依赖于当前的旗舰产品 骁龙8精英系统芯片，而是配备了 骁龙 8 第三代SoC.

不过，它的性能绝对足以满足日常使用需求。在 Geekbench 6 中，MagicPad3 明显被 OPPO Pad 4 Pro.

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3188 Points +44%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2216 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=28)
2120 Points -4%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2028 Points -8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1986 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1368 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=94, last 2 years)
1353 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9218 Points +37%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
8140 Points +21%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6749 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=28)
6605 Points -2%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5166 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 14690, n=94, last 2 years)
4315 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
3921 Points -42%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2854581 Points +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1390723 - 2162423, n=23)
1901943 Points +28%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1489057 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1432569 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=66, last 2 years)
1031860 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
18374 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 25683, n=27)
17828 Points -3%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17329 Points -6%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
14862 Points -19%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
14445 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
13094 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 27428, n=82, last 2 years)
11704 Points -36%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
17934 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=21)
16181 Points +6%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15218 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13900 Points -9%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=63, last 2 years)
13298 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
10372 Points -32%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (963 - 245629, n=18)
92071 Points +5906%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 55794, n=56, last 2 years)
4883 Points +219%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1533 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1236 Points -19%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1231 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
873 Points -43%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.4
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1483 Points +198%
Average of class Tablet
  (211 - 1483, n=15, last 2 years)
499 Points 0%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
498 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (422 - 499, n=3)
473 Points -5%
Half Precision NPU 1.4
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9666 Points +1861%
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 9666, n=15, last 2 years)
1541 Points +213%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
493 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (415 - 497, n=3)
468 Points -5%
Quantized NPU 1.4
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
13178 Points +1069%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 13178, n=15, last 2 years)
2341 Points +108%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1127 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (933 - 1133, n=3)
1064 Points -6%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (3092 - 8305, n=6)
4033 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (66.1 - 8305, n=10, last 2 years)
1384 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
120 Points
Score V6
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
12784 Points +32%
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
9698 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5170 - 9698, n=6)
7676 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=21, last 2 years)
2777 Points -71%

GPU 基准测试表明 Adreno 750Honor 平板电脑的 Adreno 750 性能不错，但它甚至无法与 Adreno 830.在这里，Pad 4 Pro 的性能有时比 MagicPad3 高出 40% 以上。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6637 Points +28%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6165 Points +19%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5178 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3218 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1404 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6683 Points +29%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6149 Points +18%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5192 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3301 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1422 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25482 Points +32%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19364 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12985 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4975 Points -74%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11992 Points +39%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10645 Points +23%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8647 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5468 Points -37%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11932 Points +38%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10433 Points +21%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8649 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5458 Points -37%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2601 Points +54%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2377 Points +41%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1688 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1071 Points -37%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2517 Points +48%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2390 Points +40%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1090 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps +37%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps +77%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
520 fps +29%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
402 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
156 fps -61%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -13%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
494 fps +65%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
299 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +13%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
292 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -71%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49 fps -11%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
204 fps +22%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -71%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
46 fps +2%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps +18%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 fps
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
66 fps -20%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -72%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
61 fps +2%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -12%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
252 fps +24%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
203 fps
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
181 fps -11%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -72%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps +19%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
35 fps -5%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.9 fps -73%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (245 - 263, n=3)
254 Points 0%
Honor MagicPad 3 (Chrome 139)
253.335 Points
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=22, last 2 years)
193.9 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (Chrome 137)
149.847 Points -41%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Honor MagicPad 3 (Chrome 139)
183 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
176 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=21)
159.8 Points -13%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
155 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (Chrome 137)
144 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=71, last 2 years)
126 Points -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Vivo Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 137)
84701 Points +19%
Honor MagicPad 3 (Chrome 139)
71283 Points
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
57389 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=26)
53286 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (Chrome 137)
49327 Points -31%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
42032 Points -41%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=99, last 2 years)
37774 Points -47%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=80, last 2 years)
2792 ms * -379%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ (Chrome 137)
851.2 ms * -46%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
842.2 ms * -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (510 - 2066, n=24)
812 ms * -39%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)
666.6 ms * -14%
Honor MagicPad 3 (Chrome 139)
583.3 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Honor MagicPad 3Oppo Pad 4 ProVivo Pad 5 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+Honor MagicPad 2Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
PCMark for Android
133%
64%
-10%
11%
-1%
-29%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int. (MB/s)
1675 ?(3.0.4061)
3307 ?(3.0.4061)
97%
1752 ?(3.0.4061)
5%
1290 ?(3.0.4061)
-23%
1726 ?(3.0.4061)
3%
1485 ?(874 - 1780, n=12)
-11%
982 ?(127.1 - 3307, n=56, last 2 years)
-41%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int. (MB/s)
1443 ?(3.0.4061)
2387 ?(3.0.4061)
65%
1694 ?(3.0.4061)
17%
400 ?(3.0.4061)
-72%
1767 ?(3.0.4061)
22%
1291 ?(835 - 1669, n=12)
-11%
754 ?(87.8 - 2972, n=56, last 2 years)
-48%
Storage 2.0 random read int. (MB/s)
51.3 ?(3.0.4061)
60.1 ?(3.0.4061)
17%
21.7 ?(3.0.4061)
-58%
31 ?(3.0.4061)
-40%
47.6 ?(3.0.4061)
-7%
45.2 ?(22.8 - 74, n=12)
-12%
32.2 ?(12.1 - 63.2, n=56, last 2 years)
-37%
Storage 2.0 random write int. (MB/s)
63.9 ?(3.0.4061)
72.5 ?(3.0.4061)
13%
36.1 ?(3.0.4061)
-44%
31.1 ?(3.0.4061)
-51%
73.3 ?(3.0.4061)
15%
71.1 ?(12.9 - 137.6, n=12)
11%
51.6 ?(3.96 - 129.8, n=56, last 2 years)
-19%
Storage 2.0 (Points)
31193 ?(3.0.4061)
179375 ?(3.0.4061)
475%
155466 ?(3.0.4061)
398%
73842 ?(3.0.4061)
137%
37492 ?(3.0.4061)
20%
37281 ?(22343 - 104598, n=16)
20%
31516 ?(4257 - 179375, n=57, last 2 years)
1%

排放与能源：Honor 平板电脑中的巨大电池

温度

热量排放始终保持在无害范围内，但在某些点温度会升至最高 48.6 °C。不过，由于 骁龙 8 代 3 运行相当稳定。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，节流现象并不明显，这意味着 骁龙 8 精英版在 OPPO Pad 4 Pro的速度优势有时很低。

Max. Load
 39.9 °C48.6 °C47.1 °C 
 34.8 °C40 °C36.9 °C 
 33.1 °C35.2 °C34.8 °C 
Maximum: 48.6 °C
Average: 38.9 °C
43.9 °C45.9 °C43.6 °C
36.6 °C40.1 °C35 °C
34 °C35 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94.1 % -5%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
83.2 % -16%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.9 % -16%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.6 % -26%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 % +1%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.1 %
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.3 % -8%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.3 % -14%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79.9 % -18%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 %
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.7 % -6%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
81.5 % -18%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.7 % -20%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.9 % +25%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.1 % +6%
Honor MagicPad 3
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76.8 %
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
68.8 % -10%
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
Honor MagicPad 3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø30.4 (30-30.9)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø33.4 (32.9-39.5)
Honor MagicPad 3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø109.1 (108.5-109.4)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø121.4 (119-143.7)
Honor MagicPad 3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø28.8 (28.8-28.9)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø33.4 (31.8-40)
Honor MagicPad 3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø12.3 (9.81-12.8)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø17 (15.2-18.7)
压力测试返回顶部
压力测试返回顶部
压力测试：底部
压力测试：底部

扬声器

MagicPad3 的一大亮点是配备了四个低音单元和四个高音单元的强大 Spatial Audio 扬声器。尽管设计纤薄，MagicPad3 却能提供非常出色的声音背景和明显的低音效果。

我们的粉红噪声测量证明，Honor ，这款平板电脑的中低音最为均衡。此外，还可以通过 USB 端口或蓝牙 5.4 输出声音。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.344.42530.331.13122.6254024.526.35034.937.9632237.48020.946.610022.357.312517.762.916016.771.820013.666.925016.366.131513.968.440014.768.350014.171.56301370.580013.668100012.768.4125014.372.4160012.873.3200013.276.625001475.7315013.377.8400013.971.4500013.664630013.865.7800013.367.51000013.5671250013.566.61600012.867.8SPL25.785N0.764.1median 13.6median 68.3Delta0.72.849.352.141.741.332.2333335.236.540.123.933.119.741.420.747.51953.22156.119.861.518.462.319.56518.563.419.371.223.276.223.876.921.176.618.977.320.775.220.772.317.871.117.567.618.164.323.271.520.275.123.671.417.86818.866.518.468.732.985.51.866.4median 19.5median 68.71.54.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor MagicPad 3Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor MagicPad 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oppo Pad 4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源消耗

12 450 毫安时硅碳电池的最大充电功率为 66 W，这意味着为完全放电的电池充电需要约 1.5 小时。

与同类产品相比，其功耗效率并不高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.29 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.55 / 8.99 / 9.02 Watt
Load midlight 11.68 / 21.97 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor MagicPad 3
12450 mAh		Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
10090 mAh		Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
51%
24%
-4%
53%
29%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.55
1.5
3%
1.19
23%
3.6
-132%
0.958 ?(0.4 - 1.55, n=21)
38%
1.994 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=74, last 2 years)
-29%
Idle Average * (Watt)
8.99
1.8
80%
6.06
33%
6.52
27%
1.736 ?(0.81 - 8.99, n=21)
81%
3.79 ?(1 - 9.2, n=74, last 2 years)
58%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
9.02
2.2
76%
6.07
33%
6.54
27%
1.896 ?(0.85 - 9.02, n=21)
79%
4.15 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=74, last 2 years)
54%
Load Average * (Watt)
11.68
5.8
50%
11.45
2%
10.63
9%
8.96 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=20)
23%
9.14 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=70, last 2 years)
22%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
21.97
11.4
48%
15.65
29%
11.57
47%
12 ?(3.53 - 22, n=20)
45%
12.9 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=70, last 2 years)
41%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Honor MagicPad 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.31 (0.1395-11.8)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.09 (3.65-11.4)
Honor MagicPad 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.98 (2.92-3.21)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Honor MagicPad 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (7.95-11.8)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (10.8-11.4)
Honor MagicPad 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.98 (2.92-3.21)
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13)

电池寿命

MagicPad3 的高功耗几乎不会影响我们的 WLAN 测试，在 150 尼特亮度下，我们的运行时间超过了 22.5 小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 139)
22h 34min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Honor MagicPad 3
12450 mAh
22.6 h
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
12140 mAh
18 h
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
12010 mAh
19 h
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
10090 mAh
18.9 h
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
10.1 h

Notebookcheck 对Honor MagicPad3 的总体印象

Honor MagicPad3 可能是目前平板电脑领域音频爱好者的最佳选择。但总体而言，这款Honor 平板电脑的弱点太多，无法获得最高评价。

Honor MagicPad 3 - 09/12/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
82 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
71 / 80 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
57 / 69 → 82%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 87%
Battery
93%
Display
79%
Games Performance
46 / 65 → 71%
Application Performance
76 / 92 → 83%
AI Performance
33%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
95 / 91 → 100%
Camera
59 / 90 → 66%
Average
65%
86%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
65%
Power Use
94.5%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 44.1%

潜在竞争对手比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
85.9%
Honor MagicPad 3
Honor MagicPad 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $99.99
JZCZMCE Keyboard Case for Ho...
2. $16.99
Clear Case for Honor MagicPa...
3. $33.99
Magnetic Detachable Wireless...
List Price: 700€		595 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash13.30"
3200x2136
289 PPI
LCD
2.
87.3%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.90
YANMONGI 1 Pack Screen Prote...
2. $14.99
YANMONGI 2 Pack Screen Prote...
3. $33.99
BLCshine 360° Magnetic Priv...
List Price: 587€		675 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash13.20"
3392x2400
315 PPI
LTPS LCD
3.
84.8%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $9.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
2. $16.95
MIGOTODA PU Leather PC Mater...
3. $23.99
Compatible with Vivo Pad 5 P...
List Price: 699€		578 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash13.00"
3096x2064
286 PPI
IPS
4.
81.8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+
Samsung Exynos 1580 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 540 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 		Amazon:
1. $429.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE 12...
2. $337.49
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE w/...
3. $439.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ P...
List Price: 789€		664 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash13.10"
2880x1800
259 PPI
TFT-LCD
5.
84.8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $13.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
2. $12.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $16.95
MIGOTODA PU Leather PC Mater...
List Price: 600€		555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.30"
3000x1920
290 PPI
OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor MagicPad3 评测：巧妙的扬声器和超长电池续航时间的 13.3 英寸平板电脑
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-09-18 (Update: 2025-09-18)