Oppo Pad 4 Pro 评论：价格优惠的 13.2 英寸平板电脑，配备手写笔和骁龙 8 精英处理器

Name: Oppo Pad 4 Pro
Brand: Oppo

iPad Pro 的竞争对手，价格却只有它的一半。

Oppo Pad 4 是 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 的姊妹机型，是一款性价比极高的高端平板电脑。Oppo Pad 4平板电脑支持手写笔和最新的硬件，以不到600欧元的价格提供了一个首屈一指的完整套装。然而，有一个方面让我们对这一主张产生了质疑。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 06/04/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7 Tablet

结论旗舰级Android 平板电脑体验，中等价位

Oppo 推出的这款全新高端平板电脑采用高品质设计，是名副其实的多面手。凭借其 13.2 英寸大屏幕和快速的骁龙 8 Elite SoC，Oppo Pad 4 Pro 在中端市场上具有很强的购买力。在这一细分市场上，它几乎没有竞争对手，或者说，三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 和 iPad Pro 13 等替代产品都属于高端产品。

与竞争对手的 OLED 产品相比，Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的液晶显示屏在对比度方面有一定的劣势，但无 PMW 显示屏和高分辨率无疑是其优点；敏感用户尤其可以放心使用这款 OPPO 平板电脑。

此外，即使没有 OLED 显示屏，对于大型平板电脑来说，功耗也非常低。

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

鉴于 Oppo 平板电脑的价格，真正值得批评的地方并不多。

不过，有一个硬件缺陷仍然令人费解，而且在日常使用中可能会让人感到相当沮丧：那就是指纹传感器的缺失。在我们使用该设备的过程中，现有的面部解锁功能在 Pad 4 Pro 上的表现相当糟糕，与传统的指纹传感器相比也不那么安全。

此外，5G 和 GNSS 功能的缺失以及手掌识别方面的问题也让人有很多不满意的地方。

Pros

+ 快速 SoC

+ 明亮、无 PWM 的 144 Hz 面板

+ 高像素密度

+ 低能耗

Cons

- 无指纹传感器

- 无 5G 和 GNSS 选项

- 无 IP 等级

- 相当重

价格和供应情况

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 目前仅在中国发布。8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间的起售价为 3299 日元（约合 400 欧元）。

在我们的租赁合作伙伴 Trading Shenzhen，Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的起价约为 520 欧元。与同类产品类似，OnePlus Pad 2 Pro的前身，似乎很有可能在欧洲上市。这两款平板电脑的前身都是在全球发布的。

不过，Oppo 尚未确认这两款平板电脑在欧洲的上市时间和价格。

$11.90

YANMONGI 1 Pack Screen Protector for OnePlus Pad 2 Pro/OPPO Pad 4 Pro 13.2inch Tempered Glass Film,Anti-Scratch,Easy Installation,9H Hardness

$19.99
for Oppo Pad 4 Pro Android 15 Tablet,13.2 inch Tablets Case,Soft Silicone Adjustable Stand Cover Lightweight Kids Friendly,Black.
$9.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass Screen Protector Transparent Compatible for Oppo Pad 4 Pro 13.2"

结论旗舰级Android 平板电脑体验，中等价位
Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的规格
外壳玻璃-铝结构，边缘纤薄
功能特点超大平板电脑，带 USB 3.2 接口
软件：ColorOS 15 基于Android 15，提供七年更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统：没有 5G 和导航
摄像头光线良好时可拍摄 1300 万像素照片
附件和保修：包装盒内附带 67 W 适配器
输入设备和操作：OPPO 少走了一些弯路
显示屏明亮的 13.2 英寸 144 Hz LTPS 面板，无 PWM
性能：旗舰级高通 SoC 对决Apple M3
游戏大平板电脑 = 大游戏乐趣？
排放：Oppo Pad 4 Pro 保持冷静
能源管理：功耗低，电池寿命长
Notebookcheck 对 Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的印象
Potential competitors in comparison

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的直接竞争对手是 Apple iPad Pro 13和 iPad Air 13.这是因为 Pad 4 Pro 配备了旗舰级的高通骁龙 8 EliteSoC 处理器、最高 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间，外形尺寸与 iPad Pro 和 iPad Air 相似。

与三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 不同、不同的是，Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的显示屏长宽比为 7:5，相当于一张 A4 纸。

此外，用户还可以选配带触控板和触控笔的键盘保护套，将 Pad 4 Pro 转换为工作机。

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的规格

Oppo Pad 4 Pro

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 830

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

13.20 inch 7:5, 3392 x 2400 pixel 315 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, LTPS LCD, 540 Hz touch rate, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 222 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color sensor, hall sensor, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.97 x 289.6 x 209.6

Battery

12140 mAh

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, AF, 4K@30FPS)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, FF)

Additional features

Speakers: 8 Speaker, USB cable, Charger, Color OS 15, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

675 g

Price

587 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳玻璃-铝结构，边缘纤薄

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的外壳由玻璃和铝制成，在视觉和触觉方面都给人留下了深刻的印象。

金属一体成型结构确保 Pad 4 Pro 可以轻松承受轻微的扭转。磨砂表面可以很好地隐藏指纹。

遗憾的是，这款中端平板电脑缺乏防尘或防水的特殊认证。

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 配备了 13.2 英寸的大显示屏，但这样的尺寸很难让人舒适地单手握持，尤其是 Pad 4 Pro 的重量比华为 MatePad Pro 13.2.

Pad 4 Pro 的厚度不到 6 毫米，非常纤薄，散发着高级感。

LTPS 面板的屏占比超过 87%，边框对于平板电脑来说非常薄。

从这个角度来看 iPad Air 13的屏占比仅为 86%。

尽管如此，Oppo 并未明确透露任何有关所使用的保护玻璃的信息。

Oppo Pad 4 ProAndroid 平板电脑。图片来源：Marcus Herbrich马库斯-赫布里希

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Oppo Pad 4 Pro Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Apple iPad Air 13 2025 DIN A4 ❌

功能特点超大平板电脑，带 USB 3.2 接口

奥普推出的 Pad 4 Pro 平板电脑配备 8 GB、12 GB 或 16 GB 内存选项，以及 256 GB 和 512 GB 内部存储空间。

内存容量较小的 SKU 指定使用 UFS 4.0 存储和 LPDDR5x-4266 内存，而 16 GB 选项则使用较新的 LPDDR5T-4800。

遗憾的是，Pad 4 Pro 不支持存储扩展，也不提供 3.5 毫米耳机插孔。

Pad 4 Pro 配备了快速 USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C 端口，这与其价格相称。该端口的理论数据传输速率高达 5 GBit/s，借助 DisplayPort 适配器还可用作外接显示器的显示信号输出端口。

背面还有三个接触点，用于连接 505 g 智能触摸键盘保护套。

软件：ColorOS 15 基于Android 15，提供七年更新

按照 OPPO 的一贯风格，底层Android 15 操作系统与该公司自己的 ColorOS 15 用户界面相结合。测试期间的安全补丁一直更新到 2025 年 4 月。

由于Oppo尚未在Oppo安全中心正式发布Pad 4 Pro，因此有关Oppo为中国版平板电脑提供软件支持的计划仍存在疑问。

长期软件维护 Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 那样的长期软件维护，Oppo 不太可能为 Pad 4 Pro 提供。中国版本更有可能获得四到五年的更新。

如果 Pad 4 Pro 真的在欧洲上市，它将受到欧盟新法规的限制，这意味着至少可以预期到 2031 年。

值得一提的是，Pad 4 Pro 兼容Apple 设备，如 MacBook Pro共享照片或文件。通过 O+ Connect 应用程序，Pad 4 Pro 还可以作为外置多点触摸屏使用。

无界视图 "功能尤其实用，可跨显示屏边界同时使用三个应用程序。

可持续性

在实现可持续发展目标的透明度方面，Oppo 肯定还有很多工作要做。

遗憾的是，没有关于所用回收材料数量的具体信息。此外，也没有关注用户的可修复性，要验证这方面的信息几乎是不可能的。

Pad 4 Pro 的包装没有使用塑料，而是用大豆油油墨印刷的。根据公司的可持续发展报告，包装使用的纤维中有 45% 是由回收材料制成的。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：没有 5G 和导航

虽然 Pad 4 Pro 支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 协议，但它不支持使用快速的 6 GHz 频段进行 Wi-Fi 传输。

与我们的参考产品华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器配合使用时，Oppo 平板电脑只能在 2.4 GHz 和 5 GHz 频段内进行连接，不过由于在 5 GHz 频段内使用了 VHT160，我们的 Wi-Fi 6E 路由器仍能实现高速传输。

我们测得的峰值接收速率超过 1,800 Mbps。但是，我们在发射时却远远低于这个速度。

Pad 4 Pro 没有用于确定位置的 GNSS 模块，因此只能通过已知的 Wi-Fi 网络大致估算定位。这款来自 Oppo 的高端平板电脑也没有蜂窝模块。

Networking
Oppo Pad 4 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	878 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1723 (min: 1322) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	990 (min: 496) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	979 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1888 (min: 1860) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1842 (min: 940) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	941 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1408 (min: 1014) MBit/s ∼76%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1018 (min: 1003) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	968 (min: 908) MBit/s ∼56%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1598 (min: 1108) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	960 (min: 700) MBit/s ∼52%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1025 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1253 (min: 812) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1276 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1340 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼73%
Average of class Tablet
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	549 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	551 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1253 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼76%

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1598 (1108-1731)

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø960 (700-1188)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø878 (807-984)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1723 (1322-1804)

摄像头光线良好时可拍摄 1300 万像素照片

对于大多数用户来说，Pad 4 Pro 这样的大型设备上的摄像头是次要的，但 OPPO 平板电脑仍提供了两个相当实用的摄像头。

800 万像素的前置摄像头在日光下成像质量不错，清晰度也不错，不过偶尔会出现曝光问题。

机身背面有一个 1300 万像素的传感器，可在明亮光线下拍摄出完美的照片。但仔细观察，照片显示的细节有限，动态范围较低。

我们在确定的人工光源下进行色彩分析，发现很少有主要的异常值（DeltaE > 10）。

尽管如此，Pad 4 Pro 还是非常适合扫描文件或将笔记数字化，相机应用中有一个特殊模式可用于此目的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

附件和保修：包装盒内附带 67 W 适配器

供货范围包括一个 67 W 快速充电电源适配器、一条 USB Type-A 转 Type-C 数据和充电线以及中文信息资料。

我们的租赁合作伙伴深圳贸易公司还为中国充电器捆绑了一个欧盟适配器和一个 USB OTG 适配器。

作为 Pad 4 Pro 的额外配件，Oppo 提供了配套的 Pencil 2 Pro，售价约 100 欧元，可选键盘盖售价 130 欧元。

我们的进口设备享有 12 个月保修。.如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将平板电脑寄往德国的收货地址。

输入设备和操作：OPPO 少走了一些弯路

13.2 英寸 LTPS 面板采用 540 Hz 采样率，可快速、准确地实现触摸输入。不过，Pad 4 Pro 的触摸屏每秒只能扫描 120 次可能的触摸。

得益于 144 Hz 的高刷新率，ColorOS 界面上的动画显得非常流畅。

Pad 4 Pro 的 7:5 长宽比与一张 A4 纸和 iPad Air 13 的长宽比相似。 iPad Air 13 相比，例如 Galaxy 平板电脑相比。

因此，与传统的 16:9 面板相比，Pad 4 Pro 的长宽比提供了更宽的可视区域，这对于阅读文件或上网冲浪尤其有利。

Pad 4 Pro 兼容 OPPO 的 Pencil 2 Pro，重约 15 克，据称能分辨超过 16000 级压力。这样就可以使用 Oppo 平板电脑手写笔记和素描。

制造商宣称的 2 毫秒延迟在同类产品中名列前茅。遗憾的是，我们没有收到 Pencil 2 Pro 的测试样品来检验这些说法。

值得注意的是，这款中端平板电脑没有振动电机。也没有指纹扫描仪。我们实在无法理解为什么 OPPO 要在这里偷工减料。

生物识别只能通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别。在测试中，即使在光线条件良好的情况下，2D 人脸识别功能也无法让我们信服。做得更好.这种方法也被认为不如指纹识别安全。

此外，掌纹识别功能还需要在软件方面进行优化，这样才不会阻碍手写笔或手指的输入。在测试时，Pad 4 Pro 上的这一功能并不稳定。

显示屏明亮的 13.2 英寸 144 Hz LTPS 面板，无 PWM

LC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

Pad 4 Pro 采用 13.2 英寸 LTPS 面板，可自适应地将帧速率从 144 Hz 降至 60 Hz。屏幕分辨率为 3,392 x 2,400 ，像素密度高达 315 PPI，超过了 300 PPi 的 "魔力 "极限。相比之下，iPad iPad Pro 13的像素密度仅为 264 PPI。

OPPO 声称最大亮度为 600 cd/m²，我们可以在纯白背景下确认这一点。在平均图像电平（APL）18 下，液晶屏达到了 903 cd/m² 的高亮度，与宣传的 900 尼特峰值亮度相匹配。虽然对于 HDR 内容来说并不完美，但亮度足以带来良好的观看体验。

在我们的测量中，12 位面板没有检测到任何 PWM 闪烁，这对于对屏幕闪烁敏感的用户来说是一个真正的优势。


635 cd/m²	642 cd/m²	658 cd/m²
667 cd/m²	672 cd/m²	645 cd/m²
653 cd/m²	623 cd/m²	670 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 672 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 651.7 cd/m² Minimum: 0.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 672 cd/m²
Contrast: 1461:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.396

	Oppo Pad 4 Pro LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra AMOLED 2X, 2960x1848, 14.6"	Apple iPad Air 13 2025 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"	Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Flexible OLED, 2880x1920, 13.2"	Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Screen		3%	3%	27%	-8%
Brightness middle	672	605 -10%	607 -10%	795 18%	726 8%
Brightness	652	603 -8%	576 -12%	791 21%	691 6%
Brightness Distribution	93	98 5%	87 -6%	97 4%	91 -2%
Black Level *	0.46		0.5 -9%		0.55 -20%
Contrast	1461		1214 -17%		1320 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.18	2.6 18%	1.52 52%	1.1 65%	4.67 -47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.84	5.4 -12%	3.5 28%	2.5 48%	5.6 -16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	1.6 27%	2.2 -0%	2.1 5%	1.8 18%
Gamma	2.396 ^92%	2.08 ^106%	2.197 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.249 ^98%
CCT	7070 ^92%	6405 ^101%	6929 ^94%	6822 ^95%	6382 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8429 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

显示屏的设置非常广泛。除了各种色彩配置文件外，还可以调整色温和色彩空间。

不过，即使在相当小的 sRGB 色彩空间中，个别色彩的差异也清晰可见。0.46 cd/m² 的黑阶确保了日常使用中 1:1,500 左右的良好对比度。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
15.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.4 ms rise
15.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
30.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

Oppo 平板电脑的可视角度相当稳定，只有在显示屏全黑时才会出现轻微的模糊现象，在日常使用中几乎看不出来。

144 Hz 的面板为户外使用提供了足够的亮度储备。不过，玻璃表面的反光仍然令人讨厌。

性能：旗舰级高通 SoC 对决Apple M3

Oppo Pad 4 Pro 配备了骁龙 8 精英芯片，这在中端价位产品中是相当出色的。与 OPPO Find N5相比，Pad 4 Pro 并没有使用配备 7 个 Oryon Gen 2 性能核心的 8 Elite 芯片，而是使用了配备 6 个核心的精简版芯片。

在 Geekbench 测试中，Pad 4 Pro 的性能甚至超过了 Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra.iPad iPad Air 13配备了 M3 芯片的单核数据也无法与 Pad 4 Pro 相提并论。

尽管如此，在人工智能测试和系统基准测试中，Oppo 桌子的性能还是相当弱。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3188 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2309 - 3228, n=18)	3028 Points -5%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192	2994 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2213 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2192 Points -31%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	1574 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=89, last 2 years)	1219 Points -62%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192	11752 Points +27%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9218 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7784 - 10401, n=18)	9207 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	7327 Points -21%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	6723 Points -27%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	5159 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=89, last 2 years)	3888 Points -58%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2854581 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2340778 - 3015111, n=14)	2688292 Points -6%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192	2147386 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2033124 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1891925 Points -34%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	1087402 Points -62%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2854581, n=54, last 2 years)	905191 Points -68%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (14862 - 27169, n=16)	21037 Points +42%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	17967 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	16743 Points +13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	15804 Points +6%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	14862 Points
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 25683, n=79, last 2 years)	10829 Points -27%

CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1153 - 2674, n=12)	1991 Points +70%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1431 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	1367 Points +17%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1172 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	1125 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=67, last 2 years)	826 Points -30%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	11721 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8334 - 14066, n=13)	11183 Points +3%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	10865 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	10498 Points -3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	8050 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 11721, n=64, last 2 years)	4724 Points -57%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	16435 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (10849 - 20776, n=13)	15673 Points +4%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	15124 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	14858 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	12284 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 16435, n=64, last 2 years)	7792 Points -48%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7263 - 20572, n=13)	13330 Points +20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	11834 Points +6%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11132 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	10000 Points -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	8600 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 12938, n=64, last 2 years)	5468 Points -51%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	56004 Points +32%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	42342 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (35527 - 51041, n=13)	41778 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	33602 Points -21%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	20520 Points -52%
Average of class Tablet (418 - 57192, n=64, last 2 years)	11187 Points -74%
Web
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2056 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2051 Points +2%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2007 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	1937 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1202 - 2363, n=13)	1875 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2056, n=64, last 2 years)	1346 Points -33%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	74437 Points +315%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	17975 Points 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	17934 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=12)	17127 Points -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	12773 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=63, last 2 years)	12029 Points -33%

AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	55794 Points +4414%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (787 - 307528, n=12)	27152 Points +2097%
Average of class Tablet (138 - 156427, n=54, last 2 years)	6977 Points +464%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1458 Points +18%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1236 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	1109 Points -10%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	8305 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	3377 Points
Average of class Tablet (97.8 - 8305, n=7, last 2 years)	1944 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (137 - 287, n=4)	234 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288	97.8 Points
Score V6
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	12784 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (302 - 12784, n=12)	7937 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	7341 Points -43%
Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 12784, n=12, last 2 years)	2550 Points -80%

集成的 Adreno 830图形处理器非常强大。在苛刻的层级测试中，它的性能超过了 Immortalis-G720的 Tab S10 Ultra即使在高 4K 分辨率下，也能达到稳定的 44 帧/秒。

Adreno 830 的性能往往比 iPad Air 13 的性能高出 30% 以上。 iPad Air 13的 M3 芯片尽管Apple 平板电脑需要处理的像素要少得多。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6637 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5527 Points -17%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	5145 Points -22%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4514 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1757 Points -74%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	7031 Points +5%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6683 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5356 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4742 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1796 Points -73%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25482 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18628 Points -27%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7178 Points -72%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11992 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	9843 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8402 Points -30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4769 Points -60%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11932 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	11435 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8498 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4808 Points -60%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2601 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	1938 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1917 Points -26%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	935 Points -64%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	549 Points -79%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2517 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	2060 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1920 Points -24%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	948 Points -62%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	545 Points -78%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	809 fps +13%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	713 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	500 fps -30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	498 fps -30%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	371 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	494 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	347 fps -30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	325 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	260 fps -47%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	208 fps -58%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	115 fps +92%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps 0%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -12%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	331 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	240 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	231 fps -30%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	230 fps -31%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	142 fps -57%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76 fps +55%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	57 fps +16%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -41%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	204 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	171 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	153 fps -25%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	137 fps -33%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps -69%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65 fps +44%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 fps +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	51 fps +13%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	45 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -49%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	98 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89 fps -9%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	71 fps -28%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -64%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	93 fps +86%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps +20%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -26%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	252 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	209 fps -17%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	205 fps -19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	167 fps -34%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps -63%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	44 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	43 fps -2%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	32 fps -27%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30 fps -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15 fps -66%

Pad 4 Pro 在浏览器速度测试中表现出色，基准测试结果也相当不错。

在日常使用中，网站打开速度很快，滚动浏览也很流畅。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)	307.6 Points +54%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)	231.7 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=13)	222 Points +11%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)	200.378 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)	183.971 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)	180.698 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=74, last 2 years)	129.1 Points -36%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)	33.9 runs/min +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=11)	24.2 runs/min +47%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)	17.2 runs/min +4%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)	16.5 runs/min
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)	16.4 runs/min -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)	14.8 runs/min -10%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=44, last 2 years)	13.8 runs/min -16%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)	193 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=12)	181.9 Points +3%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)	176 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)	173 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)	164 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=74, last 2 years)	118.4 Points -33%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)	93681 Points +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (37943 - 95506, n=15)	76707 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)	71054 Points +24%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)	70252 Points +22%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)	57389 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)	56134 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=97, last 2 years)	35005 Points -39%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=83, last 2 years)	3260 ms * -389%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro (Chrome 135)	666.6 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (Chrome 130)	632.4 ms * +5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) (Chrome 134)	625.7 ms * +6%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)	579.9 ms * +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 873, n=13)	531 ms * +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)	322.8 ms * +52%

* ... smaller is better

	Oppo Pad 4 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra	Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)	Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		18%	-12%	-10%	8%	-51%
Sequential Read 256KB	3801.54	3912.45 3%	1864.54 -51%	3868 2%	3694 ?(3249 - 4384, n=37) -3%	1294 ?(126.9 - 3984, n=79, last 2 years) -66%
Sequential Write 256KB	3334.62	2963.58 -11%	1441.8 -57%	3047.6 -9%	2730 ?(555 - 3484, n=37) -18%	917 ?(78.2 - 3484, n=79, last 2 years) -73%
Random Read 4KB	297.28	342.97 15%	305.89 3%	241.2 -19%	382 ?(218 - 483, n=37) 28%	209 ?(20.1 - 474, n=79, last 2 years) -30%
Random Write 4KB	335.89	554.76 65%	533.47 59%	290.9 -13%	413 ?(51.8 - 730, n=37) 23%	216 ?(8.23 - 668, n=79, last 2 years) -36%

游戏大平板电脑 = 大游戏乐趣？

除了上述基准软件包之外，我们还使用当前的Android 游戏对 Pad 4 Pro 的图形处理能力进行了更深入的研究。

我们使用GameBench来确定 Play Store 中两款选定游戏的准确帧率。

在《PUBG Mobile》中，Pad 4 Pro 无法实现超过 100 帧/秒的高帧率游戏。

而骁龙 8 精英版在要求苛刻的 "玄心冲击"中的表现足以证明该芯片的强劲性能。

在这里，最高图形设置下的帧率非常稳定。不过，目前在Android 中还无法实现高于 60 fps 的帧率。

不过，据 OPPO 称，Pad 4 Pro 在某些游戏中可以支持 120 fps。

Oppo Pad 4 Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø59.9 (58-60)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø89.8 (85-91)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø60 (59-61)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.6 (38-41)

排放：Oppo Pad 4 Pro 保持冷静

温度

由于散热表面积大，因此骁龙 8 精英版可以很好地散热。除了热点区域外，Pad 4 Pro 的石墨和 VC 冷却系统使其在长时间负载后仍能保持低于 40 °C 的舒适机箱温度。

尽管如此，在 3DMark 压力测试中，由于热量散发而导致的系统性能下降仍然十分明显。

我们确定了约 20% 的适度节流。尽管如此，Pad 4 Pro 在 "狂野生活 "压力测试中的帧速率仍然是Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 的两倍。的两倍。

Max. Load

Idle


39.1 °C	44.5 °C	35.9 °C
35.8 °C	37.4 °C	32.8 °C
32.9 °C	33.1 °C	32.9 °C

Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 36 °C


35 °C	49.3 °C	41.8 °C
33.8 °C	36.9 °C	37.7 °C
32.4 °C	34.7 °C	33.4 °C

Maximum: 49.3 °C
Average: 37.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.3 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	99.7 % +20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % +20%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82.9 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	72.4 % -13%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.8 % +20%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	88.6 % +6%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83.3 %
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.8 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.6 % -14%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91.3 % +15%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	88.4 % +11%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	79.7 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	79 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.2 % +21%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe	92.9 % +15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	86.6 % +7%
Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.1 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	80.7 % 0%

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø33.4 (32.9-39.5)

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.7 (22.2-27.1)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø121.4 (119-143.7)

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.4 (60.3-60.5)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø33.4 (31.8-40)

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.7 (22.1-24.2)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø17 (15.2-18.7)

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.8 (10.4-12.1)

发言人

大尺寸 Oppo 平板电脑的优势之一是为出色的音频系统提供了空间，总共有四个扬声器，每侧有两个高音扬声器和两个低音扬声器。

尽管有这样的安排，但我们的粉红噪声测量结果显示，中音太强。低音是可以感受到的，但其他旗舰平板电脑的声音更有深度。

通过 USB Type-C 端口可实现有线耳机解决方案，而蓝牙 5.4 则提供无线音频连接。

Pad 4 Pro 支持多种蓝牙音频编解码器，包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、LDAC 和 LHDC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理：功耗低，电池寿命长

耗电量

尽管机身纤薄，Oppo Pad 4 Pro 却配备了 12,140 毫安时的大容量电池。电池的最大充电功率为 67 W，不支持无线充电。

如果使用合适的电源适配器，Pad 4 Pro 的充电时间约为 1.5 小时。

对于这种尺寸的平板电脑来说，功耗非常低。闲置时的功耗不到 2 W，与效率较低的智能手机.

即使在负载情况下，Pad 4 Pro 的耗电量也明显低于采用 OLED 面板的同类产品。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.5 / 1.8 / 2.2 Watt
Load	5.8 / 11.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Pad 4 Pro 12140 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 11200 mAh	Apple iPad Air 13 2025 mAh	Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 5050 mAh	Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 10200 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		-119%	-168%	-81%	-32%	10%	-59%
Idle Minimum *	1.5	3.34 -123%	2.1 -40%	3.74 -149%	1.5 -0%	0.837 ?(0.49 - 1.5, n=15) 44%	1.778 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=74, last 2 years) -19%
Idle Average *	1.8	5 -178%	8.3 -361%	4.24 -136%	1.8 -0%	1.296 ?(0.87 - 2.06, n=15) 28%	3.73 ?(1 - 9.2, n=74, last 2 years) -107%
Idle Maximum *	2.2	5.11 -132%	8.5 -286%	4.34 -97%	2.3 -5%	1.475 ?(0.94 - 2.2, n=15) 33%	4.21 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=74, last 2 years) -91%
Load Average *	5.8	12.77 -120%	11.9 -105%	6.94 -20%	11.1 -91%	8.62 ?(5.8 - 13, n=13) -49%	9.42 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=74, last 2 years) -62%
Load Maximum *	11.4	15.94 -40%	16.9 -48%	11.8 -4%	18.5 -62%	11.9 ?(8.86 - 19.2, n=13) -4%	13.2 ?(4.6 - 46.7, n=74, last 2 years) -16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.09 (3.65-11.4)

Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.79 (2.1-16.8)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13)

Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.84 (2.74-3.27)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (10.8-11.4)

Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.8 (12.6-16.9)

Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.75 (1.449-2.13)

Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.84 (2.74-3.27)

电池寿命

Pad 4 Pro 的显示屏亮度调至 150 cd/m²，续航能力令人印象深刻，在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中可持续使用近 18 个小时，连续播放视频 21.5 个小时，这对于同尺寸的平板电脑来说非常不错。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		43h 9min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 136)		17h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		21h 27min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 52min

	Oppo Pad 4 Pro 12140 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 11200 mAh	Apple iPad Air 13 2025 mAh	Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) 5050 mAh	Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 10200 mAh
Battery Runtime		-46%	-25%	-49%	-30%
Reader / Idle	2589	935 -64%	1529 -41%		1422 -45%
H.264	1287	721 -44%	829 -36%		998 -22%
WiFi v1.3	1077	585 -46%	794 -26%	552 -49%	768 -29%
Load	292	207 -29%	298 2%		219 -25%

Notebookcheck 对 Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的印象

与 OLED 竞争产品相比，Oppo Pad 4 Pro 是一款出色的 LCD 替代产品，它采用旗舰级 SoC，价格却低得多。

Back to the verdict

Oppo Pad 4 Pro - 05/25/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

73 / 80 → 91%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

57 / 69 → 83%

Weight

80 / 40-88 → 84%

Battery

91%

Display

85%

Games Performance

51 / 65 → 78%

Application Performance

74 / 92 → 80%

AI Performance

18%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

84 / 91 → 93%

Camera

63 / 90 → 70%

Average

66%

87%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
35%

Packaging
70%

Power Use
95.3%

Repairability
31%

Software Updates
63.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 49.1%

Potential competitors in comparison

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 87.3%	Oppo Pad 4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $11.90 YANMONGI 1 Pack Screen Prote... 2. $19.99 for Oppo Pad 4 Pro Android 1... 3. $9.96 Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass... List Price: 587€	675 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13.20" 3392x2400 315 PPI LTPS LCD
2. 87.2%	Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $1,129.99 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra... 2. $849.99 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S10+ Plus... 3. $1,219.93 SAMSUNG - Galaxy Tab S10 Ult... List Price: 1339€	718 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14.60" 2960x1848 239 PPI AMOLED 2X
3. 87.4%	Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3 ⎘ Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe	Amazon: $699.00 List Price: 949€	616 g	128 GB NVMe	12.90" 2732x2048 265 PPI IPS
4. 85.4%	Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) HiSilicon Kirin T92 ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $29.99 Case for Huawei MatePad Pro ... 2. $23.69 Bruni Screen Protector compa... 3. $20.67 MIGOTODA PU Leather PC Mater... List Price: 1199€	580 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13.20" 2880x1920 262 PPI Flexible OLED
5. 86.4%	Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $729.99 Lenovo - Yoga Tab Plus - 12.... 2. $267.00 Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre... 3. $14.95 ProCase 2 Pack Screen Protec... List Price: 799€	640 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.