Notebookcheck Logo
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 平板电脑评测

配备 13.2 英寸和骁龙 8 精英处理器的廉价平板电脑 - OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 评测

最佳 iPad Air 替代品变得物美价廉

13.2 英寸大屏幕 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro（支持手写笔）提供了一个完整的软件包，价格不到 600 欧元（约合 705 美元）。尽管价格处于中等水平，但这款高端平板电脑的最佳硬件和高品质给人留下了深刻印象。但在日常操作中，设备中缺少的一个部件着实让我们恼火。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

对 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 的评价

无论出于何种原因，不想购买 iPad Air 13 的用户都可以从Apple 的 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 中找到这款大型消费平板电脑的完美替代品，而且价格明显更实惠。OnePlus 的优质平板电脑外形与 iPad Air 相似，但液晶屏更好，电池续航时间更长，图形性能也有可观的提升。此外，OnePlus 还能通过与 MacOS 设备的无缝交互和智能软件功能为Apple 用户加分。

在Android 的中端价位段，Pad 2 Pro 的骁龙 8 精英版也提供了极为出色的性能，与Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 等高端产品相比，Pad 2 Pro 的性能为其购买提供了有力的论据。但设备中的一个缺憾可能会让一些用户在日常操作中感到不便：缺少指纹传感器。这尤其是因为面部解锁功能并不安全，而且不幸的是，在日常操作中效果也不尽如人意。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

那些不想购买进口平板电脑的用户--尽管Pad 2 Pro也提供德语语言包，而且你可以使用内部应用商店轻松安装谷歌PlayStore--会在Pad 3上找到与OnePlus 2 Pro相对应的全球通用的平板电脑，尽管价格更贵。一般来说，制造商不会为其高端平板电脑提供 5G 选项或卫星定位功能。

Pros

+ 无 PWM 的明亮显示屏
+ 清晰的 144-Hz 面板
+ 强大的 SoC
+ 几乎没有节流
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 诱人的游戏性能

Cons

- 无指纹传感器
- 更新时间不明确
- 没有配备全球导航卫星系统的 5G 选项
- 重量大

价格和供应情况

配备12GB工作内存和256GB闪存的OnePlus Pad 2 Pro基础版售价3199元（约合458美元）起。在为我们提供测试机的深圳贸易公司，价格约为 666 美元起。在欧洲，OnePlus 平板电脑的技术规格与 OnePlus Pad 3 几乎完全相同，不过它采用的是氧操作系统。

Amazon Logo
$549.00
OnePlus Pad 2-12GB RAM + 256GB Storage 12.1" Display Android Tablet, Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Processor, 8MP Front & 13MP Rear Cameras, 67W Fast Charging, AI Eraser 2.0, Wi-Fi
  • $382.25
    OnePlus Pad 11.61" LCD Display, 8GB RAM,128GB Storage, MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Android 13.1, 144HZ Refresh Rate, Dolby Vision Atmos, Wi-Fi with Cellular Data Sharing Tablet
  • $829.99
    Microsoft Surface Pro 2-in-1 Laptop/Tablet (2024), Windows 11 Copilot+ PC, 13" Touchscreen Display, Snapdragon X Plus (10 Core), 16GB RAM, 256GB Storage, Platinum

由于外形相似，OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 是 iPad Air 13 的直接竞争对手。 Apple iPad Air 13.凭借其 骁龙8精英版Android 平板电脑提供了强大的硬件。此外，选配的键盘盖（包括触控板和触控笔）可让您将 Pad 2 Pro 用作工作和 笔记本电脑的替代品.但是，为了实现相当实惠的价格，OnePlus 默认不包含这些功能元素，我们在日常操作中会错过它们。

OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 的规格

OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Pad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 830
Memory
12 GB 
Display
13.20 inch 7:5, 3392 x 2400 pixel 315 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, LTPS LCD, 540 Hz touch rate, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 222 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color sensor, hall sensor, OTG, Miracst
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.97 x 289.6 x 209.6
Battery
12140 mAh
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, AF, 4K@30FPS)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: 8 speakers, USB cable, charger, ColorOS, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
675 g, Power Supply: 109 g
Price
550 Euro
Links
OnePlus homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 -Android 平板电脑，边框纤薄

灰色 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
灰色 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro

OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 的显示屏对角线为 13.2 英寸，提供了大量的屏幕空间，但这也使它成为一款非常大的平板电脑，尽管其显示屏与表面的有效比率超过 87%。显示屏周围的小边框为它带来了现代感。例如 Apple iPad Air 13的屏占比仅为 86%。

制造商没有提供任何有关所用材料的信息。OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 仍然以其出色的做工和高质量的金属一体式机身结构给人留下了深刻印象。但是，OnePlus 平板电脑的重量比 华为 MatePad Pro 13.2但 OnePlus 平板电脑比华为 MatePad Pro 13.2 重近 100 克（约 3.5 盎司），单手握持也不太舒适，重达 675 克（约 24 盎司）。

背面的磨砂表面有助于隐藏指纹。这款中端平板电脑没有任何官方防尘防水认证。

尺寸比较

❌
289.6 mm 209.6 mm 5.97 mm 675 g289.6 mm 198.3 mm 5.9 mm 578 g285.4 mm 185.4 mm 5.6 mm 571 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 6.1 mm 616 g271.25 mm 182.53 mm 5.5 mm 508 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 大型平板电脑，配有快速 USB

快速 USB 3.2 (Gen 1) 连接可让您通过 DisplayPort 适配器将图像信号输出到外部显示器。如果您愿意，还可以将 Pad 2 Pro 与电视等设备无线连接。

此外，背面有三个接触点，可以连接 Smart Touch 键盘盒。但请记住，这也不允许通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。您可以使用 USB OTG 来连接其他外部存储介质。

OnePlus 提供不同版本的高端平板电脑，内存容量分别为 8GB、12GB 或 16GB，内置 UFS 4.0 存储空间为 256GB 或 512GB。顶级版本使用主频为 4,800 MHz 的 LPDDR5T 内存，而较小的型号则配备 LPDDR5x 内存（4,266 MHz）。

箱底
箱底
机箱顶部（音量键、麦克风）
机箱顶部（音量键、麦克风）
机箱左侧（开关按钮、扬声器）
机箱左侧（开关按钮、扬声器）
机箱右侧（扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、扬声器）
机箱右侧（扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、扬声器）

软件 - 配有Android 15 的 OnePlus 平板电脑

在我们测试时，OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 运行的是Android 15，辅以自 2025 年 7 月起的内部 ColorOS 15 用户界面和安全补丁。需要特别强调的是，它与Apple 设备的兼容性简化了照片和文件的共享。此外，借助 "O+ Connect "应用程序，Pad 2 Pro 还可用作外置多点触控显示器。而 "无界视图 "功能也非常实用，可以在显示屏边框之外同时操作三个应用程序。

软件支持的期限仍不清楚，因为制造商没有在更新保证书上说明。不过，Apple 也没有为其 iPad 机型.

OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Notebookcheck 评测
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Notebookcheck 评测
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Notebookcheck 评测
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Notebookcheck 评测

可持续性

相比之下 Apple相比，OnePlus 在透明说明所用材料方面显然还有待提高，因为没有具体信息说明所用回收材料的比例。在维修方面，也很难评估其用户友好性。不过，值得肯定的是，Pad 2 Pro 的包装完全不含任何塑料。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 没有 5G 的大型平板电脑

与Android 领域的高端机型相比，Pad 2 Pro 并不包含用于确定准确位置的 GNSS 模块，因此只能通过连接的 WLAN 网络来大致确定位置。OnePlus 平板电脑也没有移动通信模块选项，因此在外出时只能使用智能手机的数据连接。

在家中，OnePlus 高级平板电脑支持当前最大带宽的 WiFi 7，但无法使用快速的 6 GHz 频段创建 WLAN 连接。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时，Pad 2 Pro 只能在 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段内通信，不过由于采用了 VHT160，它在 5 GHz 频段内的传输速度非常高，几乎达到了 1,700 Mbit/s。不过，OnePlus Pad 在接收数据时速度明显较慢。

Networking
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1693 (min: 1456) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
768 (min: 499) MBit/s ∼46%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
941 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1408 (min: 1014) MBit/s ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
994 (min: 974) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
956 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1709) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1782 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
787 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1002 (min: 910) MBit/s ∼59%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
534 (min: 376) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1687 (min: 1532) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
998 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1125 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1335 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1453 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼82%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
559 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
583 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1257 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1401 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼79%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø941 (780-1109)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1408 (1014-1550)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1693 (1456-1801)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø768 (499-1009)

摄像头 - OnePlus 在高端平板电脑中使用 1300 万像素摄像头

使用 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 拍摄的照片
使用 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 拍摄的照片

OnePlus 2 Pro 的 800 万像素前置摄像头配备了固定对焦功能，在白天也能提供稳定的效果。 背面的 1300 万像素主摄像头能在光线充足的条件下拍摄出稍好的照片。不过，图像的动态效果并不总是最佳的，这在略显平淡的图像区域会很明显。作为一款平板电脑，Pad 2 Pro 的色彩准确度和细节清晰度尚可，但与参考值有明显偏差，尤其是蓝色色调。

用户很可能主要使用相机拍摄文档或笔记。为此，相机应用程序提供了一个特殊模式，方便用户拍摄此类内容。

1x
1x
3x
3x
10倍（最大值）
10倍（最大值）
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Notebookcheck 评测
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Notebookcheck 评测
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Notebookcheck 评测
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Notebookcheck 评测

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain CameraLow Light
ColorChecker
8.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Pad 2 Pro: 8.96 ∆E min: 2.91 - max: 15.52 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.5 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Pad 2 Pro: 46.76 ∆E min: 12.81 - max: 93.71 ∆E

附件和保修 -Android 平板电脑，附带充电器

Oppo Pad 2 Pro 的充电器
Oppo Pad 2 Pro 的充电器

Pad 2 Pro 的包装盒中已经包含了一个 67 瓦的快速充电器以及一条用于数据传输和充电的 USB-C 转 USB-A 连接线。如果你打算将 OnePlus 平板电脑用于工作，你可以购买具有 16000 级压力和仅 2 毫秒超低延迟的 OnePlus Smart Stylus Pro，以及 QWERTY 键盘盖作为可选配件。或许，Oppo Pad 4 Pro 的 Oppo Pencil 2 Pro 或 Pad 3 的 OnePlus Stylo 2 也能与 OnePlus 平板电脑配合使用。

我们的测试机是由深圳贸易公司借给我们的，他们在默认配件中增加了一个中国充电器的欧盟适配器和一个 USB-OTG 适配器。在德国，进口设备可以在 12 个月的保修期内寄往德国地址进行维修，这大大简化了德国客户的维修工作。

输入设备和操作 - 配有笔输入的大型平板电脑

OnePlus 为降低成本，在 Pad 2 Pro 上取消了一些舒适功能。虽然对于一款 13.2 英寸的大平板电脑来说，缺少振动电机尚可忍受，但在日常操作中，完全通过前置摄像头的 2D 人脸识别进行生物解锁肯定会让一些用户感到不便。这款平板电脑不仅没有指纹传感器，这在同价位产品中令人惊讶，而且在我们的测试中，即使在光线良好的条件下，面部解锁功能也无法稳定工作。我们希望 OnePlus 能在电源键上安装一个电容式传感器。

另一方面，这款高端平板电脑的输入设备令人信服。手指输入非常快速和准确。面板的扫描速率高达 540 Hz，触摸屏默认每秒可识别 120 次触摸输入。144 Hz 的高刷新率也使 ColorOS 用户界面的动画看起来非常流畅。

显示屏的边长比为 7:5，采用了经典的书页格式（约为 DIN A5），非常适合用于生产任务。这种格式比许多平板电脑的 16:9 面板宽得多。 三星Galaxy Tab在阅读文档或上网冲浪时，可视面积更大。

显示屏 - 屏幕清晰的 OnePlus 平板电脑

子像素网格
子像素网格

OnePlus 平板电脑 13.2 英寸显示屏的分辨率为 3,392 x 2,400 像素，像素密度高达 315 PPI，大大高于 300 PPI 的 "魔力 "极限。相比之下 iPad Pro 13仅达到 264 PPI。

我们需要特别强调的是，12 位面板不会出现 PWM 闪烁，这对于敏感用户来说是一大优势，可以带来更舒适的观看体验，使用时间也更长。Pad 2 Pro 采用液晶面板，自适应刷新率高达 144 Hz，必要时可降至 60 Hz 以节省电池电量。

OnePlus 规定的最大亮度为 600 cd/m²，在我们的测试中，纯白背景下也能达到这一亮度。在实际应用中，APL18 模式的显示亮度高达 929 cd/m²，几乎与宣传的最高亮度 900 尼特完全一致。

643
cd/m²		621
cd/m²		599
cd/m²
634
cd/m²		691
cd/m²		684
cd/m²
672
cd/m²		613
cd/m²		629
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 691 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 642.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 691 cd/m²
Contrast: 1152:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.01 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
97.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.193
CCT: 6615 K
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"		Apple iPad Air 13 2025
IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2800x1752, 12.4"		Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Tandem OLED, 2800x1840, 12.2"		Vivo Pad 5 Pro
IPS, 3096x2064, 13"
Screen
-3%
-41%
22%
-1%
Brightness middle
691
607
-12%
471
-32%
1036
50%
683
-1%
Brightness
643
576
-10%
473
-26%
1039
62%
668
4%
Brightness Distribution
87
87
0%
97
11%
94
8%
94
8%
Black Level *
0.6
0.5
17%
0.5
17%
Contrast
1152
1214
5%
1366
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.01
1.52
24%
3.1
-54%
1.4
30%
1.9
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.86
3.5
-22%
5.8
-103%
2.6
9%
3.42
-20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
2.2
-29%
2.4
-41%
2.2
-29%
2.4
-41%
Gamma
2.193 100%
2.197 100%
2.06 107%
2.22 99%
2.378 93%
CCT
6615 98%
6929 94%
6746 96%
6829 95%
6867 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们测得 Pad 2 Pro 面板的黑色值为 0.6 cd/m²，对比度约为 1:1200，虽然不错，但并不出众。虽然达不到 OLED 竞争对手那样强大的对比度值，但也确保了黑色色调有足够的深度。 OLED 竞争对手.

Color OS 为彩色显示器提供了多种设置选项。除了预定义的色彩配置文件外，您还可以单独调整色温和色彩空间。尽管选项众多，但在相对较小的 sRGB 色彩空间中，单独色彩的显示还是存在一些细微的偏差。

色彩准确度（配置文件：专业版，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：专业版，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
15.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.4 ms rise
↘ 5.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

Pad 2 Pro 的视角稳定性非常好，即使从陡峭的视角观看，显示屏也不会失真。在全黑显示屏上，我们只能看到一些轻微的混浊，在日常操作中几乎看不出来。

13.2 英寸液晶面板为户外使用提供了足够的亮度，即使在日光下也能轻松读取内容。不过，玻璃表面的反光可能会令人讨厌，从而限制了阳光直射下的可读性。


性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的 iPad Air 替代机型

OnePlus 为其 Pad 2 Pro 配备了 骁龙8精英版.在基准测试中，这款中端平板电脑的性能非常强劲，轻松超越了 Galaxy 平板电脑 S10 Ultra的 联发科 Dimensity 9300+.在许多测试中，它甚至超过了 iPad Air 13，尽管它使用的是 M3 芯片的单核性能也无法达到 Pad 2 Pro 的水平。另一方面，在人工智能测试中，高通 SoC 的性能略显薄弱。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3192 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 - 3228, n=22)
3034 Points -5%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2994 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2167 Points -32%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2028 Points -36%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1517 Points -52%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=96, last 2 years)
1281 Points -60%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
11752 Points +27%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9273 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7784 - 10401, n=22)
9225 Points -1%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
8140 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7094 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
4812 Points -48%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=96, last 2 years)
4083 Points -56%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2834345 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2340778 - 3015111, n=16)
2707247 Points -4%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2147386 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1726681 Points -39%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1049386 Points -63%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=60, last 2 years)
988477 Points -65%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14378 - 27169, n=19)
20518 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16684 Points +16%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
14445 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
14378 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
13822 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=84, last 2 years)
11155 Points -22%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1064 - 2674, n=16)
1838 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1342 Points +12%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1197 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 2155, n=67, last 2 years)
857 Points -28%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11606 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8155 - 14066, n=16)
11055 Points +2%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10873 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 12211, n=67, last 2 years)
5075 Points -53%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
15736 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (10849 - 20776, n=16)
15455 Points +2%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15201 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=67, last 2 years)
8179 Points -46%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7081 - 20572, n=16)
13035 Points +17%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11188 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10633 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17036, n=67, last 2 years)
5878 Points -47%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35063 - 384996, n=16)
62851 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
57192 Points +35%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
42432 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)
12644 Points -70%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1938 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1936 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=16)
1883 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2273, n=67, last 2 years)
1395 Points -28%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
74821 Points +317%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
17961 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=14)
17502 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=66, last 2 years)
12985 Points -28%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
54948 Points +4179%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (787 - 307528, n=14)
23511 Points +1731%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 156427, n=59, last 2 years)
7310 Points +469%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1284 Points
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1483 Points +503%
Average of class Tablet
  (229 - 1483, n=7, last 2 years)
628 Points +155%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (246 - 516, n=3)
355 Points +44%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
246 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9666 Points +3782%
Average of class Tablet
  (230 - 9666, n=7, last 2 years)
2859 Points +1048%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (249 - 505, n=3)
381 Points +53%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
249 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.4
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
13178 Points +2494%
Average of class Tablet
  (508 - 13178, n=7, last 2 years)
4122 Points +711%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (508 - 1088, n=3)
735 Points +45%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
508 Points
AI Benchmark - Score V6
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
12683 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 12784, n=13)
8302 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=15, last 2 years)
3056 Points -76%

这款来自 OnePlus 的高端平板电脑配备了非常强大的 Adreno 830作为集成图形处理器。在要求苛刻的图形基准测试（如 GFXBench 的动物测试）中，它超过了 Immortalis G720三星Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 的 Immortalis G720。尽管 M3 芯片组Apple 在高 4K 分辨率的测试中，iPad Air 13 的 M3 芯片组甚至还达不到 Pad 2 Pro 的数值。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6684 Points
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6165 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5289 Points -21%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5145 Points -23%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
7031 Points +5%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6672 Points
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6149 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5236 Points -22%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25473 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18352 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5750 Points -77%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11852 Points
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10645 Points -10%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
9843 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8132 Points -31%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11944 Points
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
11435 Points -4%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10433 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8201 Points -31%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2543 Points
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2377 Points -7%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
1938 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1894 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
433 Points -83%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2574 Points
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2390 Points -7%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2060 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1965 Points -24%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
437 Points -83%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +140%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +20%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
767 fps 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
765 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
500 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +140%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +20%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
521 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
347 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +130%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +20%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
349 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
230 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
219 fps -37%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +56%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
57 fps +14%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
217 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
171 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps -38%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +34%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
51 fps +2%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
46 fps -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps -34%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
71 fps -35%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
66 fps -39%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -75%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +82%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
61 fps +22%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +20%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
259 fps
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
205 fps -21%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
181 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps -32%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -72%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -30%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
35 fps -30%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
32 fps -36%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -76%

在测试中，Pad 2 Pro 极高的浏览器速度和稳定的基准测试结果给人留下了深刻印象。在日常操作中，网站加载迅速，滚动流畅，没有任何卡顿，带来极具吸引力的上网体验。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
307.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 289, n=14)
211 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 (Chrome 137, Performance Mode)
194.54 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025 (Chrome 137)
129.817 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
177.483 Points
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=74, last 2 years)
131.3 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
554 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (244 - 419, n=6)
362 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
256 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
157.7 runs/min
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
33.9 runs/min +98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=13)
23.5 runs/min +37%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138)
17.1 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
15.2 runs/min -11%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=48, last 2 years)
13.8 runs/min -19%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
190 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=14)
179.4 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138)
179 Points
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=75, last 2 years)
121.5 Points -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
93681 Points +64%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 137)
84701 Points +49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=19)
71058 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
67938 Points +19%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138)
56978 Points
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=101, last 2 years)
36364 Points -36%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=84, last 2 years)
3193 ms * -388%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138)
654.9 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
639.3 ms * +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 873, n=15)
532 ms * +19%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 (Safari 18)
322.8 ms * +51%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 平板电脑的 UFS 4.0 存储在访问存储数据时速度非常快。尽管在 AndroBench 测试中取得了不错的成绩，但我们仍然发现 Pad 2 Pro 在读取和写入较小的数据块时仍有改进的余地。

OnePlus Pad 2 ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Vivo Pad 5 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
11%
15%
6%
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
3864.83
3574.3
-8%
2110.35
-45%
4088.5
6%
3715 ?(3249 - 4384, n=40)
-4%
1425 ?(126.9 - 4089, n=86, last 2 years)
-63%
Sequential Write 256KB
3317.21
554.67
-83%
1988.5
-40%
3095.4
-7%
2739 ?(555 - 3484, n=40)
-17%
1022 ?(80.4 - 3484, n=86, last 2 years)
-69%
Random Read 4KB
303.59
218.43
-28%
340.83
12%
295.8
-3%
383 ?(218 - 483, n=40)
26%
217 ?(20.1 - 474, n=86, last 2 years)
-29%
Random Write 4KB
345.84
374.09
8%
745.32
116%
562.5
63%
412 ?(51.8 - 730, n=40)
19%
230 ?(8.8 - 745, n=86, last 2 years)
-33%

游戏 - 13 英寸平板电脑也非常适合玩游戏

从图形基准测试的结果来看，我们认为 Pad 2 Pro 甚至可以胜任一些高要求的游戏。我们使用当前的一些Android 游戏来评估情况是否如此，同时在我们的合作伙伴GameBench 的帮助下，确定 PlayStore 中两款游戏的准确帧率。.OnePlus 指出，Pad 2 Pro 在某些特定游戏中的 HFR 游戏帧率可达 120 FPS。

在著名的大逃杀游戏《 PUBG Mobile》中，OnePlus 平板电脑在低细节设置下的帧率超过了 100 FPS，接近指定的 120 FPS 大关。对图形要求极高的《源氏冲击》的帧速率表明，游戏过程中的散热不会成为问题：在最高图形质量下，游戏以最大可能的 60 FPS 持续运行。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø60 (58-85)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø119.4 (113-120)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.9 (56-60)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (36-41)

排放 -Android 平板电脑的温度不会很高

温度

OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 的优势在于其宽大的金属外壳，它为高通 SoC 的有效散热提供了足够的面积。 高通 SoC.Pad 2 Pro 结合石墨和蒸汽室冷却技术，即使在长时间负载的情况下，也能轻松冷却骁龙 8 Elite 的高温。除了一个小热点外，机箱温度保持在 40 °C（104 °F）以下，非常舒适。

由于散热效率高，在 3DMark 压力测试中，性能节流保持在 4% 至 14% 左右，相对较低。日常运行中的性能并没有受到这种降低的明显影响。

Max. Load
 35.7 °C39.4 °C35.8 °C 
 32.5 °C33.9 °C31.2 °C 
 31.6 °C31.8 °C31.2 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 33.7 °C
32.4 °C33.5 °C42.3 °C
31.8 °C33.4 °C35.3 °C
31 °C32.4 °C32.6 °C
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 33.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +4%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95 %
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
83.2 % -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.2 % -33%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 %
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
88.6 % -5%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79.9 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % -36%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.6 %
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
88.4 % -8%
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
81.5 % -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.1 % -32%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % +14%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
92.9 % +7%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.7 %
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
68.8 % -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.9 % -29%
0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø37.7 (37.2-40)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.1 (26.6-30)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø134.5 (133.3-140.3)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø38.7 (38.3-40)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.9 (24-27.2)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø17.8 (16.3-18.8)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.9 (13.6-14.6)

发言人

OnePlus 为其高端平板电脑配备了出色的音频系统，其中包括八个扬声器，可呈现中音和轻微的低音。两个高音扬声器和低音扬声器确保了强劲的音效。另一方面，我们的粉红噪声测量结果表明，它并没有达到其他旗舰平板电脑所提供的低沉而饱满的音量。 旗舰平板电脑.

Pad 2 Pro 不仅以其扬声器系统，还以其对蓝牙编解码器的广泛支持征服了发烧友用户。它提供蓝牙 5.4，包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、LDAC 和 LHDC。USB-C 端口可用于有线音频传输，让您可以连接耳机或外置扬声器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204642.42537.842.53130.830.84033.330.75033.737.86323.238.18020.344.710021.850.312520.453.616022.257.620018.561.925015.262.73151767.340014.668.150016.773.463021.878.280021.176.8100016.978.4125017.975.5160016.175.3200014.374.8250014.975315016.572.5400018.667.1500022.869.6630023.472.7800023.671.2100002074.91250018.9661600019.164.8SPL31.886.3N1.572median 18.6median 72Delta2.8542.739.746.239.139.631.33530.237.932.626.526.322.129.925.344.224.7562460.220.460.815.859.517.963.514.957.917.658.225.56117.763.717.463.815.368.816.269.614.865.61669.317.862.81659.722.162.221.662.926.166.820.46420.460.320.959.932.277.71.642.2median 17.9median 62.23.12.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus Pad 2 ProApple iPad Air 13 2025
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Air 13 2025 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 大型平板电脑可快速充电

耗电量

Pad 2 Pro 的电池最大充电功率为 67 瓦，不支持无线充电。这款中端平板电脑使用附带的充电器充电速度很快。在我们的测试中，完全充电大约需要 90 分钟。尽管 Pad 2 Pro 外壳纤薄，但电池容量却高达 12,140 mAh。

闲置时的功耗不到 4 瓦，处于良好水平。同样有趣的是，尽管 OnePlus 平板电脑在 GFXbench 中的数值较高，但其功耗却低于 iPad Air 13。 iPad Air 13.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.8 / 4.2 / 4.8 Watt
Load midlight 10.2 / 12.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
12140 mAh		Apple iPad Air 13 2025
 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
5050 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-37%
-8%
59%
39%
17%
Idle Minimum *
3.8
2.1
45%
3.05
20%
1.2
68%
1.137 ?(0.49 - 3.8, n=20)
70%
1.857 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=79, last 2 years)
51%
Idle Average *
4.2
8.3
-98%
4.57
-9%
1.99
53%
1.711 ?(0.87 - 4.2, n=20)
59%
3.69 ?(1 - 9.2, n=79, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Maximum *
4.8
8.5
-77%
4.65
3%
2.05
57%
1.925 ?(0.94 - 4.8, n=20)
60%
4.01 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=79, last 2 years)
16%
Load Average *
10.2
11.9
-17%
13.35
-31%
9.04 ?(5.8 - 13, n=16)
11%
9.18 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=76, last 2 years)
10%
Load Maximum *
12.4
16.9
-36%
15.55
-25%
12.9 ?(8.86 - 19.5, n=16)
-4%
12.7 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=76, last 2 years)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø10.7 (7.65-12.4)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.79 (2.1-16.8)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.59 (4.36-5.29)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.84 (2.74-3.27)

Power Consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.3 (12.2-12.4)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.8 (12.6-16.9)
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.59 (4.36-5.29)
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.84 (2.74-3.27)

电池寿命

Pad 2 Pro 不仅电池容量大，而且电池续航时间对于屏幕大于 13 英寸的平板电脑来说也非常长。在我们的 WLAN 测试中，将显示屏亮度调节到 150 cd/m²，平板电脑的续航时间几乎达到 24 小时。在持续循环播放视频时，电池的续航时间也令人印象深刻。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137)
23h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 49min
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
12140 mAh		Apple iPad Air 13 2025
 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
5050 mAh		Vivo Pad 5 Pro
12010 mAh
Battery Runtime
-28%
-65%
-48%
-20%
H.264
1463
829
-43%
WiFi v1.3
1420
794
-44%
502
-65%
743
-48%
1138
-20%
Load
289
298
3%
Reader / Idle
1529

笔记本检查总体评价

OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 是Android 市场上 OLED 平板电脑的绝佳 LCD 替代品，也是 iPad Air 13 的一流替代品，而且价格更实惠。

OnePlus Pad 2 Pro - 07/26/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
73 / 80 → 91%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
57 / 69 → 82%
Weight
80 / 40-88 → 84%
Battery
93%
Display
86%
Games Performance
54 / 65 → 84%
Application Performance
73 / 92 → 79%
AI Performance
16%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
90 / 91 → 98%
Camera
63 / 90 → 70%
Average
67%
88%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
35%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
92.8%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
60%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 48.8%

可能的替代方案比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 配备 13.2 英寸和骁龙 8 精英处理器的廉价平板电脑 - OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-07-27 (Update: 2025-07-27)