苹果 iPhone 17 Pro Max 的轻量级旗舰替代品——索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 评测

Name: Sony Xperia 1 VIII
Brand: Sony

表现强劲，但还不够好？

索尼的这款旗舰手机比Galaxy S26 Ultra或小米17 Ultra轻便且小巧得多，但据称也配备了顶级摄像头。此外，它还保留了3.5毫米耳机插孔和microSD卡槽。阅读这篇评测，了解Xperia 1 VIII为何未能跻身“高端”之列。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 07/12/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Wi-Fi 7 Smartphone

关于索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 的总结

在我们的评测中，Xperia 1 VIII 给人的印象喜忧参半，因为索尼并未始终如一地坚持自己的道路。新一代 Xperia 手机缺乏索尼标志性的 21:9 窄屏设计和超高 4K 分辨率，显得有些随意，与三星、OPPO 或小米等超高端竞品相比，其独特卖点也相对较少。剩下的只有过去的一些优点，例如SD卡插槽、无刘海设计以及3.5毫米耳机插孔——这些功能在智能手机领域可能正变得越来越小众。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of Sony Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

除了Full HD+显示屏外，由于摄像头传感器尺寸较小，索尼在跻身智能手机顶级行列的雄心上也未能完全实现。不过在日常使用中，Xperia 1 VIII仍能拍出非常出色的照片——暂且不提长焦镜头的话——而且其OLED显示屏的清晰度对大多数用户来说应该已经足够了。

总而言之，Xperia 1 VIII 提供了一套非常出色的整体配置，应该会特别吸引索尼发烧友以及偏爱稍小巧些的智能手机的用户。

Pros

+ 功能丰富

+ 拍照效果出色（尤其是广角）

+ 功耗低

+ 亮度高的OLED显示屏

+ 芯片组运行速度快

Cons

- 长焦性能欠佳

- 充电速度慢

- 仅支持1080p分辨率显示

- 边框较宽

- PWM频率较低，且未提供护眼相关信息

索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 的价格与上市情况

Xperia 1 VIII 提供 256 GB 存储空间和 12 GB 运行内存的版本，售价 1,499 欧元（约合 1711 美元），亚马逊德国站（Amazon.de）亦有销售。顶配机型（1 TB 存储空间，16 GB 运行内存）采用“原生金”配色，售价 1,999 欧元（约合 2,282 美元），仅在索尼在线商店独家发售。

$1,030.00
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 256GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, Black
$14.99
Suttkue for S-Ony Xperia 1 VIII Magnetic Shell Case,high qualit,Hard Shell,Non-Slip Touch,Scratch Resistant,Anti-Skid-Black
$1,233.53
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 512GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, White

关于索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 的总结
索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 的规格参数
案例——具备IP68级防水性能的安卓手机
产品特点——配备3.5毫米耳机插孔并支持SD卡的高端智能手机
软件——索尼承诺为其旗舰手机提供长期更新
通信与全球导航卫星系统（GNSS）——配备 Wi-Fi 7 和 5G 的安卓手机
手机功能与通话质量——搭载 eSIM 的索尼 Xperia 1 VIII
相机——与小米17 Ultra相比，这款旗舰手机搭载的传感器较小
配件与保修 - 索尼手机（不含电源适配器）
输入设备与操作——未配备超声波传感器且不支持面部解锁的安卓手机
显示屏——索尼推出的高端智能手机，其像素数少于三星或OPPO
性能——搭载高通顶级芯片组的索尼Xperia 1 VIII
排放量——存在限速且散热效果差的安卓手机
电池续航——索尼Xperia 1 VIII虽然不支持快充，但支持无线充电
Notebookcheck 综合评分
各种可行方案的比较

索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 的规格参数

Sony Xperia 1 VIII (Xperia 1 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 840

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.50 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 396 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 211 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n75/n77/n78/n79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 162 x 74

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30 Watt wired, 15 Watt wireless

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.9, 24 mm, OIS, 1/1.35", Zeiss T* lens coating) + 48 MPix (2.9x optical zoom, f/2.8, 70 mm OIS) + 48 MPix (f/2.0, 16 mm, 1/1.56")
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.0, 24 mm. 4K@60fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, USB cable, Sony UI, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.97W/kg head, 1.09W/kg body | SBC, AAC, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | IP68, fanless, waterproof

Released

05/13/2026

Weight

200 g

Price

1499 Euro

Links

Sony homepage
Sony notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

案例——具备IP68级防水性能的安卓手机

从外观上看，最引人注目的就是宽大的屏幕边框，在这个价位段显得有些过时。Xperia 1 VIII 的屏占比仅为 86.5%，显然落后于诸如 Vivo X300 Ultra 等竞争对手明显落后，后者屏占比超过90%。

机身正面采用康宁大猩猩Victus 2玻璃，背面则采用大猩猩Victus玻璃。结合IP68级防水防尘认证和金属边框，整体机身非常坚固耐用。

这款索尼手机的设计灵感源自宝石纹理，背部采用纹理处理，不仅握感舒适，而且几乎不会留下指纹。其手感明显优于前几代Xperia机型，尽管在质感感知方面仍存在一定程度的个人喜好差异。

这款重200克（约7盎司）的旗舰智能手机，与同类超高端竞品相比，握在手中感觉轻盈舒适，且平衡感极佳。 2026款机型上保留了一项经典的索尼特色：专用的快门按钮。

尺寸对比

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Xiaomi 17 Ultra Sony Xperia 1 VIII DIN A6 ❌

产品特点——配备3.5毫米耳机插孔并支持SD卡的高端智能手机

索尼始终如一，继续在其旗舰手机上配备3.5毫米耳机插孔并支持microSD卡，从而能够以相当实惠的价格将内置UFS存储空间扩展至最高2 TB。不过，该卡槽在使用我们的测试卡——Angelbird AV Pro V60时，表现并不理想。

而支持通过HDMI或DisplayPort接口进行有线视频输出的USB 3.2端口，表现则明显更佳。在使用 M.2 SSD（三星 SSD 7T）进行的复制测试中，我们测得传输速度为 344 MB/s。连接的存储设备不仅可以格式化为 FAT32，还可以格式化为 exFAT。但无法使用 NTFS 文件系统。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=55, last 2 years)	32.1 MB/s +58%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	20.33 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Smartphone (n=1last 2 years)	17.2 MB/s
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	17.18 MB/s

跨平台磁盘测试（CPDT）

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø29.2 (23.4-33.9) MB/s

Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø29.4 (23.9-33.9) MB/s

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø44.2 (25.9-86.6) MB/s

Sony Xperia 1 VII Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø43.4 (10.5-186.4) MB/s

软件——索尼承诺为其旗舰手机提供长期更新

Xperia 1 VIII 预装了 Android 16 系统。制造商在 Android 系统界面之上叠加了其专属的 Sony UI，并承诺提供长期系统更新——尽管这在与三星或谷歌的竞争对手相比仍稍显不足。在软件支持方面，索尼承诺提供四个主要 Android 版本以及六年的安全更新。

可持续发展

这款索尼旗舰机型采用大家熟悉的无塑料包装，由竹子、甘蔗和FSC认证的再生纸制成。运输箱使用纸胶带封装。

我们未能找到有关该产品环境足迹或回收率的具体信息。根据EPREL数据库，该产品的可维修性和备件供应有限（D类）。

通信与全球导航卫星系统（GNSS）——配备 Wi-Fi 7 和 5G 的安卓手机

Xperia 1 VIII 支持广泛的 5G 和 4G 频段，以及最新的蓝牙 6.0 和 Wi-Fi 7。在与我们的华硕参考路由器配对时，测试显示其峰值数据传输速率高达近 4,000 Mbit/s。

Networking
Sony Xperia 1 VIII 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	3524 (min: 3157) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	3710 (min: 3489) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	946 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	927 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1844 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1619 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2173 (min: 1784) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2017 (min: 1945) MBit/s ∼47%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	3410 (min: 1851) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	4314 (min: 4191) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	959 (min: 636) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1595 (min: 953) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	922 (min: 721) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1697 (min: 1513) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1040 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1289 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1495 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2391 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2338 (min: 370) MBit/s ∼54%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	693 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	741 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1267 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1393 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2125 (min: 398) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2099 (min: 407) MBit/s ∼49%

Sony Xperia 1 VIII 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 6 GHz: Ø3524 (3157-3896) MBit/s

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3: Ø3406 (1851-3797) MBit/s

Sony Xperia 1 VIII 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 6 GHz: Ø3710 (3489-3930) MBit/s

Oppo Find X9 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3: Ø4314 (4191-4439) MBit/s

Xperia 1 VIII 利用全球所有卫星网络进行定位，但在我们的测试中，它仅以单频模式运行。在骑行过程中，我们发现其路线追踪与 Garmin Venu 2 相比存在些许偏差。尽管如此，这款索尼手机仍完全能够胜任日常导航任务。

手机功能与通话质量——搭载 eSIM 的索尼 Xperia 1 VIII

Xperia VIII 支持双卡功能，用户可选择使用一张 nano-SIM 卡和两张 eSIM 卡，或两者组合使用。通话音质极佳；对方声音清晰易懂，语音还原自然。

相机——与小米17 Ultra相比，这款旗舰手机搭载的传感器较小

索尼再次将现款Xperia 1定位为拍照旗舰，尽管其摄像头硬件往往难以跻身顶尖行列。虽然竞争对手的旗舰机型有时会配备尺寸大得多的传感器，但这款索尼手机的主摄像头仍沿用1/1.35英寸传感器。话虽如此，日常使用中的成像质量依然非常出色。特别是在弱光环境下，其锐度表现几乎令人惊喜。不过，为提升动态范围而采用的RAW多帧处理效果并不理想。快门速度也相对较慢。

在该价位段，我们认为新搭载的4800万像素长焦镜头仍有很大改进空间——尽管它现在配备了1/1.56英寸传感器，但其3倍光学变焦在高端机型中并不能给人留下深刻印象。即使在5倍变焦下，Xperia 1 VIII也会丢失大量细节，画面显得有些模糊。

另一方面，我们非常喜欢超广角镜头——索尼在此领域确实处于领先地位。1/1.56英寸的传感器提供了出色的锐度和自然的色彩还原。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low Light Zoom 5x Ultra-wide-angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件与保修 - 索尼手机（不含电源适配器）

索尼在其旗舰机型中仅随附说明资料。出厂时未预装屏幕保护膜。制造商还提供可选的半透明材质手机壳，该手机壳内置支架。

该保修期在德国有效期为24个月，若通过索尼自有保险套餐“Sony Care”进行延长。

输入设备与操作——未配备超声波传感器且不支持面部解锁的安卓手机

在 6.5 英寸 OLED 显示屏上的操作响应精准。指纹传感器位于电源键内，因此并未采用竞争对手旗舰机型所采用的超声波技术。尽管Xperia 1 VIII仍能快速解锁，但我们的指纹并非总能一次识别成功。内置的线性振动马达提供了非常舒适的触觉反馈。

显示屏——索尼推出的高端智能手机，其像素数少于三星或OPPO

早在其前代机型一样，索尼已经放弃了21:9的设计，Xperia 1 VIII也继续采用19.5:9的屏幕比例。这款6.5英寸、120Hz的OLED面板，其尺寸明显小于竞争对手，不过其1080p的分辨率也远低于三星Galaxy S26 Ultra 或 OPPO Find X9 Ultra的1080p分辨率也低得多。简体中文（大陆）。

在我们的测试中，Xperia 1 VIII 未能达到极高的亮度水平——在贴近实际的 APL18 测试中亮度超过 2,000 cd/m²——但这款索尼手机在播放 HDR 内容时的表现也并不特别差。屏幕亮度控制采用约240 Hz的PWM频率。索尼很可能也为其低频OLED面板采用了PWM调光方式，尽管未提供具体细节。


1394 cd/m²	1404 cd/m²	1404 cd/m²
1413 cd/m²	1407 cd/m²	1404 cd/m²
1433 cd/m²	1415 cd/m²	1412 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1433 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1409.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.08 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1407 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6545 K

	Sony Xperia 1 VIII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"	Oppo Find X9 Ultra AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Xiaomi 17 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Display		29%	-20%	63%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	2195	2713 24%	1807 -18%	3528 61%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	2215	2975 34%	1746 -21%	3648 65%
Response Times		5%	-2%	-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	1.19 ?(0.542, 0.646)	0.84 ?(0.451, 0.3885) 29%	1.4 ?(0.5285, 0.87) -18%	1.7 ?(0.7, 1) -43%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	1.01 ?(0.4785, 0.5265)	1.25 ?(0.5915, 0.6615) -24%	0.89 ?(0.4365, 0.4525) 12%	1.3 ?(0.6, 0.7) -29%
PWM Frequency (Hz)	240	240	90	121
PWM Amplitude * (%)	15.63	13.99 10%	15.51 1%	17 -9%
Screen		-24%	2%	5%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1407	1339 -5%	1143 -19%	1303 -7%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1410	1381 -2%	1150 -18%	1300 -8%
Brightness Distribution (%)	97	94 -3%	98 1%	98 1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	2.5 -127%	1.2 -9%	1.12 -2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3	3.8 -27%	1.9 37%	2.25 25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	1.7 19%	1.7 19%	1.7 19%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.05 ^107%	2.28 ^96%	2.242 ^98%
CCT	6545 ^99%	6498 ^100%	6717 ^97%	6404 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / -7%	-7% / -3%	14% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3528 cd/m² +61%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2713 cd/m² +24%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2195 cd/m²
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1807 cd/m² -18%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3648 cd/m² +65%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2975 cd/m² +34%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2215 cd/m²
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1746 cd/m² -21%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz
Amplitude: 15.63 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7753 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定缩放级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管在最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来是平的，但这只是由于缩放比例所致。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）

我们使用照片分光光度计和CalMAN分析软件来检测色彩还原效果。在“Creator”色彩模式下，我们获得了最佳效果。这使得色彩和灰度还原的偏差非常小。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4785 ms rise
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5265 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.542 ms rise
1.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.646 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms).

性能——搭载高通顶级芯片组的索尼Xperia 1 VIII

Xperia 1 VIII 的处理性能源自骁龙 8 Elite Gen 5。尽管这款索尼手机中的芯片组性能确实强劲，但在 Geekbench 多核测试中的表现却略显逊色。

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	3759 Points +6%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3722 Points +5%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	3673 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3462 - 3831, n=21)	3636 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	3542 Points
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=196, last 2 years)	1874 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	11411 Points +18%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	11342 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	11337 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9631 - 12383, n=21)	10951 Points +14%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	9631 Points
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=196, last 2 years)	5571 Points -42%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9790 - 28557, n=13)	19502 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	19499 Points +7%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18697 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	18153 Points
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	15387 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=149, last 2 years)	15190 Points -16%

CrossMark - Overall
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2611 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2543 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1698 - 2856, n=17)	2337 Points -10%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1998 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=114, last 2 years)	1256 Points -52%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	14611 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	14036 Points
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	13308 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5640 - 16690, n=15)	12920 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	11953 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=124, last 2 years)	8055 Points -43%
System
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	20567 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	17435 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	17372 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9356 - 21153, n=15)	17029 Points -2%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	15667 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=124, last 2 years)	11604 Points -33%
Memory
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	19082 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18561 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5531 - 24052, n=15)	15720 Points -18%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	15598 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	10780 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=124, last 2 years)	9286 Points -51%
Graphics
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	59787 Points +23%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	51642 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9859 - 62342, n=15)	50221 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	48731 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	47299 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=124, last 2 years)	28462 Points -42%
Web
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2421 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2358 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	2297 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1561 - 2587, n=15)	2187 Points -10%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	2165 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=124, last 2 years)	1752 Points -28%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	25289 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	24487 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	24002 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (10671 - 24487, n=11)	21159 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=109, last 2 years)	21135 Points -14%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	18565 Points -24%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	768 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	715 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	704 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=114, last 2 years)	663 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=20)	642 Points -10%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	534 Points -25%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=114, last 2 years)	2573 Points +265%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	757 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	705 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	679 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=20)	629 Points -11%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	551 Points -22%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=114, last 2 years)	3869 Points +148%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1769 Points +14%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1558 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	1530 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (974 - 1987, n=20)	1453 Points -7%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	1322 Points -15%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288	21273 Points
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	21143 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, Adreno 840, 12288	21071 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1098 - 22780, n=10)	17792 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=82, last 2 years)	5926 Points -72%

该 Adreno 840 助力Xperia 1 VIII在图形基准测试中取得非常高的分数，但即便在此方面，这款索尼手机的表现仍略低于预期。不过，"多亏"了较低的1080p分辨率，该机在GFXBench高端测试中的屏幕得分表现非常出色。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8053 Points +24%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7233 Points +11%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7087 Points +9%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6496 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7735 Points +18%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7265 Points +11%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7098 Points +8%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6574 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30624 Points +14%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30187 Points +12%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30076 Points +12%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26846 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14321 Points +17%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13925 Points +14%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12911 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12231 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	19359 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14525 Points +19%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12895 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12211 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3088 Points +13%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2989 Points +10%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2823 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2721 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3084 Points +14%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3023 Points +12%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2796 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2705 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	887 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	813 fps +9%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	745 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	711 fps -5%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	489 fps +30%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	441 fps +17%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	429 fps +14%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	376 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	385 fps +23%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	367 fps +17%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	313 fps
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	288 fps -8%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps -12%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	241 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	214 fps +12%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	201 fps +5%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	191 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps -9%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	142 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	127 fps +17%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	119 fps +9%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	109 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	355 fps +41%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	339 fps +35%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	322 fps +28%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	252 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 fps +23%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58 fps +21%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	55 fps +15%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	48 fps

Jetstream 2 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 5

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	429.726 Points +11%
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (Chrome 143)	411.755 Points +7%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII (Chrome 149)	386.369 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=14)	282 Points -27%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Chrome 148)	255.324 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=88, last 2 years)	219 Points -43%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (Chrome 143)	118347 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	105762 Points +12%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII (Chrome 149)	94734 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (47984 - 126661, n=14)	82791 Points -13%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Chrome 148)	65887 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=154, last 2 years)	52542 Points -45%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=132, last 2 years)	1055 ms * -192%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Chrome 148)	541.9 ms * -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 799, n=18)	463 ms * -28%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII (Chrome 149)	361.9 ms *
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (Chrome 143)	295.6 ms * +18%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (Chrome 146)	283.6 ms * +22%

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Sony Xperia 1 VIII	95 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (67 - 104, n=4)	83.3 Points -12%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra (Chrome 148)	67 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 104, n=14, last 2 years)	65.8 Points -31%

* ... smaller is better

	Sony Xperia 1 VIII	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra	Oppo Find X9 Ultra	Xiaomi 17 Ultra	Average 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-30%	17%	4%	-6%	-40%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3375.84	3626.09 7%	4121.89 22%	3987.92 18%	3486 ?(2057 - 4088, n=9) 3%	2241 ?(270 - 4370, n=183, last 2 years) -34%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3756.12	1658.91 -56%	4098.07 9%	3974.23 6%	3170 ?(1998 - 3756, n=9) -16%	1924 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=183, last 2 years) -49%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	579.58	513.44 -11%	578.32 0%	547.56 -6%	428 ?(325 - 580, n=9) -26%	312 ?(47.6 - 614, n=183, last 2 years) -46%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	526.99	207.16 -61%	723.61 37%	524.05 -1%	604 ?(348 - 871, n=9) 15%	362 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=183, last 2 years) -31%

排放量——存在限速且散热效果差的安卓手机

温度

即使在我们的负载测试场景下，热点温度达到约49 °C（120.2 °F），表面温度仍保持在可接受的范围内。不过，在3DMark压力测试中，这款索尼手机的最大性能下降了约40%至50%。

Max. Load

Idle


45.1 °C	48 °C	47 °C
48.4 °C	47.8 °C	44.7 °C
48.1 °C	47 °C	42.9 °C

Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 46.6 °C


39.2 °C	44.4 °C	43.6 °C
41.7 °C	47.8 °C	49.3 °C
41.7 °C	46.8 °C	49.4 °C

Maximum: 49.4 °C
Average: 44.9 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	67.4 % +23%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	63.7 % +16%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	55 %
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.4 % -7%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	73 % +34%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58.2 % +7%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	54.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 % -1%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	70.5 % +10%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	64.2 %
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.2 % -16%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	46.9 % -27%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72.6 % +17%
Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61.8 %
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.5 % -7%
Oppo Find X9 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	46.3 % -25%

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø26.3 (21.6-39.5) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø30.3 (25.3-46.9) %

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø95.8 (78.1-142.2) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø108.4 (86.9-168.9) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø162.1 (141.7-189.1) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø34.5 (27.6-48.7) %

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø27.1 (24.5-38.1) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø31.3 (25.1-46.4) %

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø13.2 (12.1-19.6) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5 f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø15.5 (13-22.6) %

演讲者

Xperia 1 VIII 配备了双扬声器系统，低音柔和，中频和高频清晰分明。作为一款顶级智能手机，其音质总体上非常出色。

对于音频发烧友而言，或许更重要的是该机配备了 3.5 毫米耳机插孔，其信号非常纯净、噪声极低（信噪比：100.7 dBFS），并且支持通过蓝牙传输高分辨率音频编解码格式。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Sony Xperia 1 VIII audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 17 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%

电池续航——索尼Xperia 1 VIII虽然不支持快充，但支持无线充电

能量摄入

在电池及其容量方面，索尼原地踏步。充电速度也是如此。这款5,000毫安时电池的有线充电功率仅为30瓦。该款索尼手机的无线充电功率最高为15瓦。

该机的功耗控制非常高效，尤其是在手机处于待机状态时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.12 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.52 / 0.85 / 0.94 Watt
Load	6.9 / 6.97 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Sony Xperia 1 VIII 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X9 Ultra 7050 mAh	Xiaomi 17 Ultra 6800 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-68%	-64%	-44%	-49%	-56%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.52	0.56 -8%	1.1 -112%	0.8 -54%	0.84 ?(0.52 - 1.4, n=15) -62%	0.875 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=142, last 2 years) -68%
Idle Average * (Watt)	0.85	1.18 -39%	1.27 -49%	1.1 -29%	1.289 ?(0.74 - 2.13, n=15) -52%	1.477 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=142, last 2 years) -74%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	0.94	1.33 -41%	1.3 -38%	1.2 -28%	1.481 ?(0.75 - 2.18, n=15) -58%	1.663 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=142, last 2 years) -77%
Load Average * (Watt)	6.9	14.91 -116%	10.74 -56%	6.1 12%	7.77 ?(4.2 - 11.4, n=12) -13%	6.76 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=107, last 2 years) 2%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	6.97	16.58 -138%	11.33 -63%	15.3 -120%	11 ?(6.97 - 15.3, n=12) -58%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=107, last 2 years) -62%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.31 (0.91-8.48) Watt

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.96 (0.816-11.3) Watt

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.663 (0.609-0.953) Watt

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.713 (0.653-0.793) Watt

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.22 (6.86-12.9) Watt

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (8.09-11.4) Watt

Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.663 (0.609-0.953) Watt

Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.713 (0.653-0.793) Watt

电池续航时间

在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，索尼这款旗舰手机在实际使用条件下展现出了非常出色的续航表现。不过，其电池续航时间约为 22.5 小时，这使得 Xperia 1 VIII 的运行时间明显短于 OPPO 或小米的Ultra系列机型要短得多。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 149)		22h 44min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Sony Xperia 1 VIII 5000 mAh	22.7 h
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 5000 mAh	17.9 h
Oppo Find X9 Ultra 7050 mAh	28.2 h
Xiaomi 17 Ultra 6800 mAh	25.9 h

Notebookcheck 综合评分

对于索尼粉丝而言，Xperia 1 VIII 无疑是旗舰手机中一个值得关注的选择。不过，到2026年，其独特卖点（耳机插孔、支持SD卡、无打孔屏）很可能已被视为小众功能，对于普通消费者而言，这些因素在评估性价比时将不再是决定性因素。

Back to the verdict

Sony Xperia 1 VIII - 07/10/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

69 / 69 → 100%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

92%

Games Performance

40 / 55 → 73%

Application Performance

86 / 85 → 100%

AI Performance

45%

Temperature

81%

Noise

100%

Audio

80 / 90 → 88%

Camera

81%

Average

72%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
40%

Packaging
95%

Power Use
95.9%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
78%

Total Sustainability Score: 58.2%

各种可行方案的比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 88.3%	Sony Xperia 1 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 1499€	200 g	256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.50" 2340x1080 396 PPI OLED
2. 89.8%	Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 1449€	214 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3. 88.9%	Oppo Find X9 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 1699€	236 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED
4. 90.4%	Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $1,550.00 XIAOMI 17 Ultra Ai 5G (Compa... 2. $1,030.00 Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Un... 3. $1,227.96 Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Un... List Price: 950€	224 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

苹果 iPhone 17 Pro Max 的轻量级旗舰替代品——索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 评测

表现强劲，但还不够好？

关于索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 的总结

Pros

Cons

索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 的价格与上市情况

Table of Contents

索尼 Xperia 1 VIII 的规格参数

案例——具备IP68级防水性能的安卓手机

尺寸对比

产品特点——配备3.5毫米耳机插孔并支持SD卡的高端智能手机

跨平台磁盘测试（CPDT）

软件——索尼承诺为其旗舰手机提供长期更新

可持续发展

通信与全球导航卫星系统（GNSS）——配备 Wi-Fi 7 和 5G 的安卓手机

手机功能与通话质量——搭载 eSIM 的索尼 Xperia 1 VIII

相机——与小米17 Ultra相比，这款旗舰手机搭载的传感器较小

配件与保修 - 索尼手机（不含电源适配器）

输入设备与操作——未配备超声波传感器且不支持面部解锁的安卓手机

显示屏——索尼推出的高端智能手机，其像素数少于三星或OPPO

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能——搭载高通顶级芯片组的索尼Xperia 1 VIII

排放量——存在限速且散热效果差的安卓手机

温度

3DMark 压力测试

演讲者

Sony Xperia 1 VIII audio analysis

Xiaomi 17 Ultra audio analysis

电池续航——索尼Xperia 1 VIII虽然不支持快充，但支持无线充电

能量摄入

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 综合评分

各种可行方案的比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles