Sony Xperia 10 VIII 评测结论
Sony Xperia 10 VIII 凭借明亮的 OLED 显示屏、出色的续航、精准的定位追踪，以及耳机插孔和 microSD 卡槽等少见配置脱颖而出。这款智能手机的做工、轻巧机身和紧凑设计也颇具吸引力。
不过，高昂的价格却与性能缓慢的 Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 处理器、仅有 128 GB 的存储空间、USB 2.0 接口，以及与上一代相比毫无变化的摄像头形成反差。
缺少 HDR 支持，偶尔还会出现卡顿，这些也影响了整体观感。尽管如此，与 Xperia 10 VII 相比，尤其是亮度大幅提升的显示屏，确实是一项显著改进。
其他新功能相对来说较为有限。考虑到价格大幅上涨，与前代产品相比，Sony 整体上提供的额外价值太少。
Pros
Cons
价格和供货情况
- $1,449.99Sony Xperia 1 VII XQ-FS72 512GB 12GB Dual SIM Factory Unlocked GSM Smartphone, 5G 6.5" 120Hz OLED Display, 48MP Camera - International Version (Orchid Purple)
- $447.16Google Pixel 10a - 30+ Hours Battery, Camera Coach, Gemini - Obsidian 128GB
- $949.00Sony Xperia 10 V XQ-DC72 5G Dual 128GB ROM 8GB RAM Factory Unlocked (GSM Only | No CDMA - not Compatible with Verizon/Sprint) NGP Wireless Charger Included, Global Mobile Cell Phone - Black
Table of Contents
- Sony Xperia 10 VIII 评测结论
- 规格：Sony Xperia 10 VIII
- 做工：Xperia 10 Mk 8 具备防尘防水性能。
- 特点：价格昂贵的中端型号，仅配备 USB 2.0
- 软件：仅提供四年的 Android 版本更新
- 通信与 GNSS：搭载 6 GHz Wi-Fi 的 Xperia 10 VIII
- 手机功能和通话质量
- 相机：Xperia 10 VIII 的双摄系统速度较慢
- 配件与保修：一片巨大的空白
- 输入设备和操作
- 显示屏：更明亮，但不支持 HDR 支持不了? Wait translate "without HDR support" = 不支持 HDR. final clean.
- 性能：搭载 Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 的 Sony Xperia 10 VIII
- 发声：Xperia 10 VIII 的扬声器表现不错
- 电池续航：Xperia 10 VIII 配备 5,000 mAh 电池
- Notebookcheck 对索尼 Xperia 10 VIII 的整体印象
- 潜在替代方案对比
对于 Xperia 10 VIII，Sony 选择了渐进式改进，而非重新开始。与 Xperia 10 VII 相比，许多方面都没有变化：制造商保留了 Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SoC、5,000 mAh 电池、128 GB 存储空间以及基础相机功能。
此次最值得关注的新增配置是亮度显著提升的 120 Hz OLED 显示屏，此外硬件和软件也进行了细微调整。
与此同时，官方建议零售价已从 449 欧元上涨至 599 欧元。这些改进是否足以证明如此大幅的涨价合理，我们将在接下来的 Xperia 10 VIII 评测中一探究竟。
规格：Sony Xperia 10 VIII
做工：Xperia 10 Mk 8 具备防尘防水性能。
Sony Xperia 10 VIII 是一款较为小巧的智能手机，但机身略厚，厚度为 8.3 mm。我们测得机身边缘厚度为 8.5 mm，算上摄像头则最高达 10.1 mm。它重 168 g，相对轻巧，握在手中很舒适。
Sony 手机的屏幕边框相当厚，看起来略显过时。另一方面，显示屏没有被摄像头打断，而且两只扬声器均朝向正面。在我们的测试中，机身做工令人印象深刻，接缝均匀紧密。在扭转测试中，Xperia 10 Mk 8 机身坚固，没有发出任何声响。
这款手机符合 IP65/IP68 标准，具备防尘防水性能。SIM 卡和 microSD 卡槽也无需工具即可开启。
Xperia 10 VIII 有 Misty Lilac、Matte Gray 和 Frozen White 三种配色。
特点：价格昂贵的中端型号，仅配备 USB 2.0
Sony Xperia 10 VIII 再次仅提供 128 GB 存储空间，但仍可通过 microSD 卡扩展。另一个罕见之处是内置耳机插孔。不过，特别之处也就这些了。
对于一款售价 600 欧元的智能手机来说，USB 2.0 显得相当寒酸。此外，无法读取采用 NTFS 格式的外接存储设备。它还配备了 Bluetooth 5.4 和 NFC。
microSD 卡读卡器
虽然这款 microSD 读卡器在测试中的速度略快于前代产品，但表现仍算不上出色。好在，更换存储卡无需借助其他工具。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
软件：仅提供四年的 Android 版本更新
Sony Xperia 10 VIII 搭载 Google Android 16，并可获得四年的版本更新以及额外两年的安全补丁。
索尼预装了少数自家应用，但很少预装第三方应用。预装的只有 Facebook、Instagram 和 LinkedIn。
不过，这些应用无法彻底卸载，只能停用。
可持续性
在可持续性方面，Sony 对 Xperia 10 VIII 的信息仍相当含糊。机身含有再生塑料，但制造商未说明再生材料的具体占比。
包装由纸张以及 Sony 的专有混合材料制成，后者由竹子、甘蔗纤维和再生纸制成。Sony 也未提供该产品的具体碳足迹。
Sony 未为 Xperia 10 VIII 提供自助维修计划。对于硬件故障，制造商建议用户联系其维修服务或授权服务中心。
通信与 GNSS：搭载 6 GHz Wi-Fi 的 Xperia 10 VIII
Sony 在支持广泛移动频段方面并不算特别慷慨，4G 和 5G 都是如此。不过，在欧洲境内这不是问题；只有在洲际旅行时，才可能缺少一两个频段。
虽然没有内置 Wi-Fi 7，但至少支持 6 GHz Wi-Fi。测试中，它不仅能实现较高的数据传输速率，还能确保性能稳定。
| Networking | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
Xperia 10 VIII 在户外的卫星定位速度很快且准确，尽管这款智能手机仅支持单频 GNSS。在室内，定位所需时间并没有长很多，但精度明显较低，波动也相当大。
骑行时，我们将这款智能手机的定位能力与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。两台设备记录的总距离基本一致，相差仅 10 m。
在湖边，智能手表记录的行驶距离更准确；而在市中心，Xperia 手机的定位则更精确。
手机功能和通话质量
Sony Xperia 10 VIII 贴近耳朵通话时，通话音质听起来自然，不过背景噪音抑制效果还有提升空间。
只能使用 nano-SIM 卡和/或 eSIM。
相机：Xperia 10 VIII 的双摄系统速度较慢
至于摄像头，一切保持不变——它们与Xperia 10 VII上的摄像头完全相同。尽管前置传感器尺寸较小，但在日光下拍出的自拍效果相当不错。不过，摄像头只能以 30 fps 录制 HD 或全高清录像。
主后置传感器配有一枚超广角镜头。主摄的白平衡表现自然，但根据拍摄对象不同，动态范围还有提升空间。
在弱光下，摄像头仍能拍出不错的照片，不过需要较长的曝光时间。超广角镜头的整体构图均衡，但图像边缘会略显模糊。变焦仅支持数码变焦，最高可达 6 倍。
主摄像头录制视频时，最高支持超高清分辨率（30 fps）。不过，只有主摄像头支持这一分辨率，以及 60 fps 的全高清分辨率。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x zoomLow light
配件与保修：一片巨大的空白
Sony 不会在包装内附带任何配件。
在德国，保修期为24个月。
输入设备和操作
Sony Xperia 10 VIII 的电容式触摸屏运行流畅，滑动手感良好。
指纹传感器位于电源键中，大多数情况下也能可靠工作。Sony 再次选择不加入额外的人脸识别功能。
在振动马达方面，Sony 继续采用价格实惠的 ERM 马达。它的振动虽然强劲，但手感也有些模糊。
专用快门键既可用于截屏，也可用于启动相机应用。在相机应用中，它用作快门键。
显示屏：更明亮，但不支持 HDR 支持不了? Wait translate "without HDR support" = 不支持 HDR. final clean.
Xperia 10 VIII 的显示屏与上一代几乎没有变化；索尼只是将亮度提高了约 50%，我们的测量结果也证实了这一点。
手动调节亮度的用户可以达到最高 682 cd/m²。
不过，遗憾的是它不支持 HDR，而且 PWM 频率仅为 480 Hz，并不算高。这意味着对 PWM 敏感的用户可能会感到不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1522 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6832 K
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1" | Google Pixel 10a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy A57 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G 2772x1280, 6.8" | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8" | Sony Xperia 10 VII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 102% | 32% | 109% | 7% | -28% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1487 | 3050 105% | 1920 29% | 3493 135% | 1596 7% | 1073 -28% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1470 | 2925 99% | 1980 35% | 2695 83% | 1564 6% | 1074 -27% |
| Response Times | -23% | -21% | -11% | 16% | -17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.93 ? | 1.42 ? -53% | 1.21 ? -30% | 1.18 ? -27% | 0.64 ? 31% | 1.051 ? -13% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.93 ? | 1.07 ? -15% | 1.1 ? -18% | 0.99 ? -6% | 0.84 ? 10% | 1.26 ? -35% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 480 | 240 | 240 | 120 | 90 | 480 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 14.46 | 14.71 -2% | 16.72 -16% | 14.56 -1% | 13.58 6% | 15.04 -4% |
| Screen | 23% | -4% | -14% | -19% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1522 | 2205 45% | 1135 -25% | 1124 -26% | 1604 5% | 820 -46% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1527 | 1134 -26% | 1124 -26% | 1585 4% | 823 -46% | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 99 2% | 98 1% | 95 -2% | 97 0% | |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.4 -0% | 1.7 -21% | 1.9 -36% | 1.9 -36% | 1 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.9 | 2.3 21% | 2.5 14% | 3.5 -21% | 4.3 -48% | 1.8 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1.6 24% | 1.4 33% | 1.6 24% | 2.9 -38% | 1.4 33% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.08 106% | 2.28 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6832 95% | 6715 97% | 6578 99% | 6721 97% | 7083 92% | 6544 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
25% | 2% /
-2% | 28% /
9% | 1% /
-5% | -15% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 14.46 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下进行的测量系列（尽管最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来是平的，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示了最低亮度下振幅的放大版本。）
显示屏的色彩设置可进行大量自定义，以满足您的需求。使用“原始模式”时，我们获得了最自然的效果。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.493 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4355 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.435 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.496 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
在户外，亮度提升无疑是一大优点。即使在阳光直射下，Xperia 10 VIII 现在也更容易看清。
可视角度稳定性不错，色彩也始终不会失真。不过，在视角非常小时，画面上会出现闪烁的彩色雾影。
性能：搭载 Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 的 Sony Xperia 10 VIII
Sony Xperia 10 VIII 再次搭载Snapdragon 6 Gen 3。考虑到这款智能手机目前所处的价位，我们认为它的性能略显不足。就这一点而言，竞品通常更有优势。
日常使用时，系统偶尔会卡顿。
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 66164, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (8253 - 9538, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (587 - 729, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 中的 Adreno 710 GPU 不支持光线追踪。它适合运行简单的游戏，但运行要求较高的游戏时很快就会达到性能极限。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Press-Version) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Play-Store-Version) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Press-Version) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Play-Store-Version) | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII (es3.1) | |
| Jetstream 2 | |
| 2.0 Total | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (Chrome 147) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (109 - 147.8, n=5) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | |
| 2.2 Total | |
| Google Pixel 10a (Chrome 149) | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (Chrome 147) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=103, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (122 - 149.4, n=5) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143) | |
| WebXPRT 5 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 104, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (n=1) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 126661, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (37483 - 40500, n=5) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (978 - 1476, n=5) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (281 - 2718, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | Google Pixel 10a | Samsung Galaxy A57 | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | Sony Xperia 10 VII | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | -33% | 17% | -27% | -33% | 5% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1914.56 | 1689.27 -12% | 1683.07 -12% | 1977.37 3% | 1022.21 -47% | 1588 ? -17% | 2280 ? 19% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1802.32 | 826.38 -54% | 1119.11 -38% | 1738.18 -4% | 973.41 -46% | 820 ? -55% | 1972 ? 9% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 320.27 | 326.53 2% | 249.83 -22% | 409.28 28% | 298.75 -7% | 247 ? -23% | 317 ? -1% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 386.88 | 430.37 11% | 149.04 -61% | 547.62 42% | 354.89 -8% | 251 ? -35% | 362 ? -6% |
发声：Xperia 10 VIII 的扬声器表现不错
温度
Xperia 10 VIII 在持续负载下表面温度可能会相当高，但仍处于安全范围内。不过，即便如此，原本性能就不算特别强的 SoC 还是会出现一定程度的降频。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
扬声器
两个朝前的扬声器即使在较高音量下也能提供不错的音质，不过声音的层次感略显不足。然而，在最大音量下，它们容易出现失真。
通过 3.5 mm 耳机接口输出的音质更好，测试中的平均信噪比仅为 49.18 dBFS，但这只适用于非常狭窄的频率范围。
Sony Xperia 10 VIII audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Samsung Galaxy A57 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
电池续航：Xperia 10 VIII 配备 5,000 mAh 电池
功耗
Xperia 10 VIII 在屏幕亮度调至最高时的功耗略高，但其他方面表现平平。
我们使用Ugreen Nexode 65 W 电源适配器，在 69 分钟内为 5,000 mAh 电池充满了电。
| Off / Standby |   0.21 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle |  0.81 / 2.51 / 2.57 Watt |
| Load |
4.37 / 10.16 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 10a 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G mAh | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 5080 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 VII 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 46% | -4% | -3% | 11% | 23% | 10% | 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.81 | 0.7 14% | 0.71 12% | 1.3 -60% | 1.01 -25% | 0.85 -5% | 0.893 ? -10% | 0.901 ? -11% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.51 | 0.94 63% | 1.94 23% | 2.12 16% | 1.78 29% | 1.11 56% | 1.507 ? 40% | 1.483 ? 41% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.57 | 1.03 60% | 2.04 21% | 2.18 15% | 1.81 30% | 1.17 54% | 1.618 ? 37% | 1.677 ? 35% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 4.37 | 6.19 -42% | 4.37 -0% | 4.32 1% | 5.35 ? -22% | 6.82 ? -56% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 10.16 | 13.67 -35% | 8.7 14% | 9.09 11% | 9.86 ? 3% | 10.8 ? -6% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）
功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）
电池续航时间
在我们以 150 尼特亮度进行的标准化 Wi-Fi 浏览测试中，Sony Xperia 10 VIII 的续航时间接近 20 小时。这是个不错的成绩，但令人意外的是，它比上一代产品更差。
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII | |
Notebookcheck 对索尼 Xperia 10 VIII 的整体印象
Sony Xperia 10 VIII 凭借明亮的 OLED 屏幕、出色的续航和少见的额外功能令人印象深刻。但考虑到它价格高昂，且相比前代改进不多，在进步方面还是显得不足。
Sony Xperia 10 VIII
- 09/25/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在替代方案对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 78.5%  | Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 599€ | 168 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" 2340x1080 422 PPI OLED |
2. 85.3%  | Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 549€ | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED |
3. 81.5%  | Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 550 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 589€ | 179 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
4.  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 812 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | List Price: 600€ | 225 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI |
5. 82.5%  | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 549€ | 210 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.83" 2800x1260 450 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
