结论 - 索尼 Xperia 1 VII
对于预告中的问题,答案是肯定的,但有一个小问题。如果你喜欢用自动模式拍照,那么 Xperia 1 VII 可能不会让你满意。与前代产品一样,这款索尼智能手机也需要在最微小的细节上进行配置,才能拍出好照片。在标准拍照模式下,拍摄的照片也很出色,但终究比不上那些 "即点即拍 "的竞争产品。
索尼 Xperia 1 VII 不仅是一款小众产品,也是一款顶级智能手机。Snapdragon 8 Elite、Wi-Fi 7、超长电池续航时间、明亮的 120 Hz OLED、高级感以及强大的三摄像头系统,它绝对配得上旗舰设备的称号。
不过,Xperia 1 VII 也继承了前代产品的一些缺点。按照 2025 年的标准,顶部和底部的显示屏边框都相当厚,充电功率最高只有 30 瓦,存储空间也不超过 256 GB。按照现在的标准,1200 万像素的长焦摄像头也无法满足高端需求。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在英国,索尼 Xperia 1 VII 的购买价格为 1,399 英镑。制造商处购买。截至发稿时,该产品在美国亚马逊网站上还没有销售。
Table of Contents
- 结论 - 索尼 Xperia 1 VII
- 规格
- 手机壳 - 带有优雅触觉的轻型照相手机
- 功能 - 仅有 256 GB 存储空间
- 软件 - Xperia 1 VII 已运行Android 16
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 具有良好 GPS 和 WiFi 功能的全球通用手机 7
- 电话功能和语音质量
- 相机 - 自动模式无法利用的强大技术
- 附件和保修 - 还缺少一条 USB 电缆
- 输入设备和操作 - 响应灵敏的 Xperia 手机
- 显示屏 - 采用明亮的 120 Hz OLED 显示屏,支持 BT.2020 色彩空间
- 性能 - Xperia 1 VII 配备了 Snapdragon 8 Elite 处理器
- 游戏 - 游戏设备齐全
- 排放 - 热销智能手机,音质出色
- 电池续航时间 - 持久耐用的索尼智能手机
- Notebookcheck 总体评分
- 可能的替代品比较
索尼重新推出了高端智能手机 Xperia 1,更加强调它是摄影爱好者的创意工具。Xperia 1 VII 配备了功能更强大的超广角摄像头(以前为 1200 万像素),现在分辨率达到了 4800 万像素。它还具有更强的性能、更亮的显示屏和更长的支持时间。
规格
手机壳 - 带有优雅触觉的轻型照相手机
防尘防水的 Xperia 1 VII 保留了 Xperia 1 VI 的修长、棱角分明的设计,顶部和底部的显示屏边缘很厚。 Xperia 1 VI.金属边框将 OLED 面板(由大猩猩 Victus 2 玻璃保护)与大猩猩 Victus 玻璃后面板连接起来。
高级感也得到了保留。这款高端手机的后盖表面纹理细腻,有绿色、紫色和黑色可供选择。其触感非常优质,防滑表面几乎不会留下指纹。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
功能 - 仅有 256 GB 存储空间
作为一款高端智能手机,Xperia 1 VII 的配置很不寻常,只有一个专用的拍照按钮和一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔。此外,它仅提供 256 GB 的存储空间,可通过 microSD 卡扩展至 2 TB。快速 USB-C 端口支持有线图像输出到 HDMI 或 DisplayPort 接口。遗憾的是,通过 USB-C 接口将 Xperia 手机作为索尼相机外接显示器的流行功能已不再可用,现在只能通过订阅服务才能使用。 现在只能通过订阅.
microSD 读卡器
在使用我们的参考卡 Angelbird AV Pro V60 时,microSD 读卡器只能达到中等传输速度,与上一代产品相差无几。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Smartphone (n=1last 2 years) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
软件 - Xperia 1 VII 已运行Android 16
可持续性
索尼使用竹子、甘蔗和经 FSC 认证的再生纸制成的坚固纸质材料生产无塑料产品包装。运输纸箱使用的是纸胶带。
为了进一步改善对环境的影响,索尼在 Xperia 的许多内部组件中使用了回收塑料 SORPLAS。该制造商的目标是到 2050 年将其产品和活动的生态足迹减少到零。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 具有良好 GPS 和 WiFi 功能的全球通用手机 7
Xperia 1 VII 支持所有 4G 和 5G 移动频率,这对 DACH 地区非常重要,也使它具备了在国外使用的良好条件。
这款智能手机支持蓝牙 6.0、NFC 和用于短距离连接的 Wi-Fi 7。使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,它的 Wi-Fi 传输速度基本稳定,在 6 GHz 频段最高可达 1,359 Mbps。
Networking | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
电话功能和语音质量
在我们的测试中,Xperia 1 VII 的听筒和免提电话的通话质量非常出色。得益于高效的降噪功能,来电者的声音听起来自然易懂。
除 VoLTE 外,索尼手机还支持 Wi-Fi 通话和双卡双待。SIM 卡托盘中只能放入一张 SIM 卡,但也可以激活 eSIM。
相机 - 自动模式无法利用的强大技术
与前代产品一样,Xperia 1 VII 配备了三摄像头,并使用蔡司镜头。不过,超广角摄像头现在的分辨率为 4800 万像素,焦距范围增至 16 至 170 毫米。
4800 万像素主摄像头和 1200 万像素长焦摄像头及其 7.1 倍光学变焦保持不变。自拍摄像头也保留了 1200 万像素的分辨率。该摄像头以稳定的图像质量和美丽的虚化效果给人留下了深刻印象。
自动模式下的照片几乎不比高端竞争机型的照片差,只有在专业模式下才能真正发挥出自己的水平。在自动模式下,主摄像头和超广角摄像头在日光下仍能拍摄出非常出色的照片,即使在弱光环境下也表现出色。视频录制也是如此,最高可以 120fps 的速度录制 4K。
长焦摄像头具有 3.5 倍至 7.1 倍的可变焦率,虽然在成像质量上无法与竞争对手相提并论,但也能拍摄出清晰度不错的照片。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight imageDaylight imageUltra-wide angle5x zoomLowlight image

附件和保修 - 还缺少一条 USB 电缆
索尼没有为 Xperia 1 VII 配备 30 瓦的电源适配器。手机只附带了快速入门指南和安全信息手册。
索尼 Xperia 1 VII 提供 24 个月保修。
输入设备和操作 - 响应灵敏的 Xperia 手机
搭载 骁龙 8 精英版、12 GB 内存和采样率为 240 Hz 的精确触摸屏,Xperia 1 VII 实现了卓越的系统性能。线性振动电机可提供微妙的触觉反馈。
由于缺乏面部识别功能,手机只能通过指纹传感器进行生物解锁。指纹传感器位于电源键内,工作可靠。
显示屏 - 采用明亮的 120 Hz OLED 显示屏,支持 BT.2020 色彩空间
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1441 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6476 K
Sony Xperia 1 VII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9" | Google Pixel 9 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3" | Honor Magic7 Pro OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9" | Sony Xperia 1 VI OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Xiaomi 15 Ultra AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 1% | 44% | 32% | 0% | 7% | 14% | |
Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1441 | 1055 -27% | 2083 45% | 1607 12% | 1357 -6% | 1305 -9% | 1041 -28% |
Brightness (cd/m²) | 1450 | 1061 -27% | 2016 39% | 1609 11% | 1350 -7% | 1319 -9% | 1059 -27% |
Brightness Distribution (%) | 99 | 93 -6% | 84 -15% | 95 -4% | 94 -5% | 98 -1% | 96 -3% |
Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.5 53% | 0.7 78% | 0.9 72% | 3.1 3% | 2.8 12% | 1 69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.6 | 4.7 -2% | 2 57% | 1.8 61% | 4.7 -2% | 4.5 2% | 2.7 41% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 2.3 15% | 1.1 59% | 1.7 37% | 2.2 19% | 1.4 48% | 1.9 30% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.24 98% | 2 110% | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% |
CCT | 6476 100% | 6625 98% | 6560 99% | 6346 102% | 6391 102% | 6361 102% | 6697 97% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 14.49 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8228 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.578 ms rise | |
↘ 0.5555 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5655 ms rise | |
↘ 0.654 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). |
性能 - Xperia 1 VII 配备了 Snapdragon 8 Elite 处理器
与 骁龙 8 精英版Xperia 1 VII 配备了速度最快的Android SoC,即使在要求最苛刻的应用程序中也势不可挡。索尼手机的图形处理器性能也值得称道。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=134, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=16) |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision NPU 1.4 | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Average of class Smartphone (153 - 1176, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (246 - 676, n=8) | |
Half Precision NPU 1.4 | |
Average of class Smartphone (178 - 5178, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (249 - 669, n=8) | |
Quantized NPU 1.4 | |
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 4983, n=26, last 2 years) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (508 - 1576, n=8) |
骁龙 830 Adreno 830帮助 Xperia 1 VII 在 3DMark 等图形基准测试中始终名列前茅。在对比设备中,只有 三星Galaxy S25 Ultra速度更快,因为其主频略高于 骁龙 8 精英处理器Galaxy
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro |
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 329, n=17) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (244 - 603, n=9) | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=129, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 36.8, n=15) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=112, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (102 - 255, n=16) | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160) | |
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 273, n=139, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160) | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=23) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=194, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 1170, n=18) | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII (Chrome 139.0.7258.160) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia 1 VII | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Honor Magic7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Sony Xperia 1 VI | Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -64% | -14% | -18% | 5% | -9% | -17% | -41% | |
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3847.82 | 1717.9 -55% | 3910.81 2% | 3823.28 -1% | 3804.21 -1% | 4109.79 7% | 3688 ? -4% | 2234 ? -42% |
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 2936.71 | 253.53 -91% | 3683.81 25% | 3361.24 14% | 3348.35 14% | 3761.19 28% | 2734 ? -7% | 1833 ? -38% |
Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 477 | 218.41 -54% | 282.34 -41% | 287.85 -40% | 446.31 -6% | 312.69 -34% | 381 ? -20% | 296 ? -38% |
Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 613.9 | 261.55 -57% | 357.04 -42% | 331.61 -46% | 681.02 11% | 379.29 -38% | 399 ? -35% | 341 ? -44% |
游戏 - 游戏设备齐全
我们使用Gamebench工具的测量结果表明,Xperia 1 VII 当然适合游戏。游戏优化程序预装了一个合适的应用程序,可以对每个游戏进行单独配置,例如性能设置。
排放 - 热销智能手机,音质出色
温度
在正常使用过程中,Xperia 1 VII 的表面温度很低,但在持续负载的情况下温度会明显升高。在使用 Burnout 基准进行的压力测试中,我们测得的温度高达 48.3°C。
在内部,当温度过高时,SoC 会迅速降低性能。在 3DMark 压力测试场景中,性能下降了约三分之一。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
Sony Xperia 1 VII | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
发言人
总的来说,两个杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos)认证的扬声器听起来非常平衡,尽管缺乏低音,但在智能手机音效方面处于领先地位。
不过,如果通过蓝牙 6.0 或 3.5 毫米插孔将耳机或扬声器连接到 Xperia 1 VII,就能获得更好的音效。后者的信噪比为 99.84 dBFS,噪音极低。
Sony Xperia 1 VII audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Sony Xperia 1 VI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 持久耐用的索尼智能手机
耗电量
5000 毫安时电池的充电功率高达 30 瓦。使用第三方电源适配器(Ugreen 2C1A,65 瓦),充电周期为 1 小时 28 分钟。
因此,这款智能手机的耗电量可以说并不明显。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sony Xperia 1 VII 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4685 mAh | Google Pixel 9 Pro 4700 mAh | Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh | Sony Xperia 1 VI 5000 mAh | Xiaomi 15 Ultra 5410 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -14% | -26% | -54% | -21% | 0% | 3% | -68% | -39% | |
Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.42 | 0.42 -0% | 0.59 -40% | 0.94 -124% | 0.55 -31% | 0.4 5% | 0.49 -17% | 1.083 ? -158% | 0.857 ? -104% |
Idle Average * (Watt) | 0.93 | 1.55 -67% | 1.1 -18% | 1.5 -61% | 0.77 17% | 0.81 13% | 0.87 6% | 1.657 ? -78% | 1.417 ? -52% |
Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 0.95 | 1.58 -66% | 1.2 -26% | 1.57 -65% | 0.91 4% | 0.85 11% | 0.94 1% | 1.86 ? -96% | 1.585 ? -67% |
Load Average * (Watt) | 8.62 | 3.41 60% | 7.15 17% | 11.03 -28% | 13.81 -60% | 9.25 -7% | 8.82 -2% | 9.01 ? -5% | 7.23 ? 16% |
Load Maximum * (Watt) | 12.47 | 11.82 5% | 20.37 -63% | 11.68 6% | 16.69 -34% | 14.99 -20% | 9.26 26% | 12.8 ? -3% | 11.2 ? 10% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
索尼 Xperia 1 VII 凭借出色的电池续航时间获得了很高的分数。在实际的 Wi-Fi 测试中,它的续航时间达到了近 21.5 小时。这使它在同类产品中名列前茅,甚至超过了 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max.不过,它与 Honor Magic7 Pro或 三星Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Notebookcheck 总体评分
索尼 Xperia 1 VII 是一款顶级智能手机,拥有非常强大的硬件和全面的相机设置。不过,这款售价近 1400 英镑的索尼手机只适合希望自己调整相机设置的用户,在自动模式下,Xperia 1 VII 很难在其他高端智能手机中脱颖而出。
Sony Xperia 1 VII
- 09/22/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sony Xperia 1 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $5.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 2. $11.99 Ibywind For Sony Xperia 1 VI... 3. $6.99 Anoowkoa 2 Pack for Sony Xpe... List Price: 1499€ | 197 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.50" 2340x1080 396 PPI OLED | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe | Amazon: 1. $39.99 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Sili... 2. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 3. $169.99 OLED Screen Replacement for ... List Price: 1449€ | 227 g | 256 GB NVMe | 6.90" 2868x1320 458 PPI Super Retina XDR OLED | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 128 GB | Amazon: 1. $925.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke... 2. $1,520.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un... 3. $650.00 Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An... | 199 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2856x1280 495 PPI OLED | |
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Honor Magic7 Pro... 2. $9.99 Anbzsign (2+2 Pack) for Hono... 3. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... List Price: 1300€ | 223 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" 2800x1280 453 PPI OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $14.99 Super Fast Charger Type C, 2... 2. $7.57 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 3. $12.10 AACL 3-Pack for Samsung Gala... List Price: 1449€ | 218 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
Sony Xperia 1 VI Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $1,899.00 List Price: 1399€ | 192 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.50" 2340x1080 396 PPI OLED | |
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ... 2. $19.99 Akcoo Screen Protector for X... 3. $7.99 Kicvbnco 3 Pack For Xiaomi 1... List Price: 1499€ | 229 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.73" 3200x1440 521 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.