三星本可以拯救自己的智能手机--三星Galaxy S26+ 评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy S26+
Brand: Samsung

无心插柳柳成荫。

Galaxy S26 Plus 实际上并没有计划在 2026 年的产品线中推出，这一点从三星手机的很多方面都可以看出。得益于全新的 Exynos 2600，这款经济实惠的旗舰手机在高端市场是否仍然是一个不错的选择？我们将在测试报告中回答这个问题。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 04/14/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Smartphone Wi-Fi 7 Touchscreen

三星Galaxy S26+ 的评价

从很多方面来看，Galaxy S26+ 都表明，它只是在开发后期才推出，作为在最后一刻被取消的Galaxy S26 Edge 的替代品。因此，Galaxy S25+ 的升级非常有限也就不足为奇了。Galaxy S26+ 的改进少之又少，只能在芯片组上看到，因为软件优势会被前代产品的未来更新所抵消。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

对于 2026 版本，我们希望至少能从 Ultra 机型中看到一项功能，让它有更多存在的理由。无论是上一代的磨砂大猩猩 Amour 玻璃，还是 OLED 大屏幕的手写笔输入。

它仍然是一款非常优秀的智能手机，但在某些方面，如电池或摄像头，它看起来已经不再符合这个价位的要求。来自中国的竞争对手，如 vivo X300 Pro 或 Oppo Find X9 Pro，显然在这方面更有优势。

Pros

+ 高品质外壳

+ 长期更新

+ 环境数据透明

+ 高性能

+ 明亮的 1440p 面板

+ 音质好

Cons

- SoC 在负载情况下会节流

- 摄像头不是最先进的

- PWM 调光频率仅为 480 赫兹

- 电池容量较小

- 仅 UFS 4.0

三星Galaxy S26 Plus 的价格和供货情况

Galaxy S26+ 可在三星在线商店和包括亚马逊在内的在线零售商处购买，零售价为 1249 欧元起。

三星Galaxy S26+ 的评价
三星Galaxy S26+ 的规格
手机壳 - IP 防水三星手机
功能 -Android 电话，带 USB 3.2 接口
软件 -Galaxy 手机的长时间更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Android 带有 5G 和 WiFi 的手机 7
电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy S26 Plus（带 eSIM 卡
相机 - 三星手机没有升级
附件和保修 -Android 不带电源装置的电话
输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S26 Plus，带超声波传感器
显示屏 - 大型 OLED 屏幕，带 PWM 调光功能，但...
性能 -Galaxy 手机中的新型三星芯片组
排放量 - 带热点的三星手机
电池续航时间 -Galaxy S26 Plus 仍配备 "微型电池"
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

Galaxy S26+ 是目前 S 系列中经济实惠的旗舰手机。目前的 S 系列配备大而清晰的 OLED 屏幕。凭借全新的 Exynos 2600，三星再次在其产品组合中拥有了自己的高端芯片组。我们还将仔细研究三星的 Exynos 2200 和高通公司的骁龙 8 代 5SoC 在这项测试中的对比。如果您喜欢小一点的产品，我们的 Galaxy S26.

三星Galaxy S26+ 的规格

Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Galaxy S26 Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 2600 10c/10t, 1 x 3.8 GHz ARM C1-Ultra, 3 x 3.3 GHz ARM C1-Pro, 6 x 2.8 GHz ARM C1-Pro

Graphics adapter

Samsung Xclipse 960

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.70 inch 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 513 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LTPO-AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 220 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, DeX, UWB, Miracast, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 158.4 x 75.8

Battery

4900 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 24 mm, 1/1.56", OIS) + 10 MPix (f/2.4, 67 mm, telephoto, 1/3.94", OIS, 3x optical) + 12 MPix (f/2.2, 13 mm, ultrawide, 1/2.55"), camera2API: level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, 23 mm, PDAF)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, info material, One UI 8.5, 24 Months Warranty, IP68; HDR: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5); Head SAR 0.775 W/kg, Body SAR 1.221 W/kg; Bluetooth Codecs: AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC, SBC, fanless, waterproof

Released

02/25/2026

Weight

190 g

Price

1249 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

手机壳 - IP 防水三星手机

从外观上看，Galaxy S26+ 与前代产品几乎没有区别前代产品.尺寸和重量完全相同。制造质量非常好。

IP68 认证的机身给人以高品质的感觉，6.7 英寸 OLED 面板周围的边缘非常薄，这要归功于近 91% 的高效显示屏表面比率。

三星再次选用大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 作为保护玻璃，而不是用于 Ultra 机型.

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra OnePlus 15 Motorola Signature Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Galaxy S25+ DIN A6 ❌

功能 -Android 电话，带 USB 3.2 接口

三星为其顶级手机配备了非常完善的配置。它配备了 UWB 芯片、Samsung DeX、NFC 和快速 USB 端口（3.2 Gen.1）。支持 OTG 的端口支持有线图像输出。

通过三星便携式固态硬盘 T7，Galaxy S26+ 的数据吞吐量高达 391 MB/s。连接的数据载体可使用 exFAT 或 NTFS 格式化（仅限读取）。

软件 -Galaxy 手机的长时间更新

三星为Galaxy S26+ 提供了基于Android 16 的 One UI 8.5，并保证在七年内提供软件更新。据制造商称，每月都会推出安全补丁。

可持续性

三星智能手机部门力求透明，还为Galaxy S26+ 提供了环保相关数据，如再生材料比例或碳排放量。.

产品包装也使用回收材料。不使用塑料。在 EPREL 数据库中，三星高端产品仅列在可修复性等级 "C "下。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Android 带有 5G 和 WiFi 的手机 7

Galaxy S26+ 配备了适用于所有现代移动通信标准的多种频率。快速 Wi-Fi 7 可用于 WLAN 连接，包括 6 GHz 频段，与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器结合使用可在高峰期实现极高的传输速率。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S26+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	887 (min: 479) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	914 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1799 (min: 955) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1645 (min: 1513) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼73%
OnePlus 15 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	536 (min: 375) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1401 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼85%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼63%
Motorola Signature 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	772 (min: 566) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1513 (min: 1099) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	897 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1489 (min: 1425) MBit/s ∼91%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1053 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1257 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1468 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	691 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	734 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1274 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1394 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼85%

Samsung Galaxy S26+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1767 (955-1834)

Motorola Signature 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø897 (688-1087)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1644 (1513-1679)

Motorola Signature 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1489 (1425-1525)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø872 (479-913)

Motorola Signature 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø772 (566-870)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø912 (876-933)

Motorola Signature 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1513 (1099-1637)

Galaxy S26+ 提供全球卫星网络的双频连接，用于定位。Satfix 无论在室内还是室外都非常精确。

我们将三星手机与 Garmin Venu 2 在骑车时进行了比较。在测试中，我们的路线偏差很小，在某些情况下，比我们的参考智能手表还要好。

电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy S26 Plus（带 eSIM 卡

Galaxy S26+ 提供双卡双待功能，可使用两张 NanoSIM 卡和双 eSIM 卡，也可将两者结合使用。三星手机的语音质量非常好。

相机 - 三星手机没有升级

鉴于 Galaxy S25+Galaxy S26+ 的三摄像头与前代产品相似，这不免让人有些唏嘘。尽管如此，这款三星手机在日光下也能拍出漂亮的照片，不过人为锐化的效果让我们感到困扰。图像细节和清晰度并没有达到最佳状态，尤其是在弱光环境下。不过，Galaxy S26+ 的色彩还原调校得非常好。

超广角镜头和长焦镜头的像素分别为 1200 万像素和 1000 万像素，虽然分辨率不是特别高，也不能进行像素分档，但在光线条件良好的情况下，效果还是相当不错的。查看 vivo X300 Pro或 OPPO Find X9 Pro，S26 系列的 Plus 机型采用了相当小的图像传感器，似乎已经跟不上时代的步伐。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angle Wide-angle Low Light Zoom 5x Ultra wide-angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

附件和保修 -Android 不带电源装置的电话

Galaxy S26+ 仅随附一条 USB-C 数据线和一个 SIM 卡工具。合适的电源适配器和保护套可在三星商店购买。

保修保修期在欧洲的保修期为 24 个月，可通过 Care+ 保险套餐延长保修期。根据保险范围的不同，费用在 139 至 179 欧元之间。

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S26 Plus，带超声波传感器

触摸屏能对输入做出快速而精确的响应，而笔输入，如超级型号仍未提供。线性振动电机可提供清晰的反馈，并可在设置中根据自己的需要进行调整。

超声波指纹传感器用于生物识别安全，工作可靠且快速。此外，还可以通过前置摄像头使用不安全的 2D 人脸识别功能。

显示屏 - 大型 OLED 屏幕，带 PWM 调光功能，但...

2026 年，Plus 机型的 6.7 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏保持不变，但鉴于其吸引人的起点，这并不是问题。高分辨率（QHD+）实现了超过 500 ppi 的锐利显示，刷新率可通过 LTPO 技术在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节。

在 APL18 测量和 HDR 回放中提供的亮度都非常好，但不是顶级水平。遗憾的是，240 赫兹的面板仍然表现出相对较低的闪烁，三星也放弃了高频 PWM 调光。这里的频率只有 480 赫兹，而中国制造商而中国制造商的频率则接近 4000 赫兹。因此，对于对 PWM 比较敏感的人来说，Galaxy 手机并不理想。


1412 cd/m²	1398 cd/m²	1364 cd/m²
1404 cd/m²	1384 cd/m²	1338 cd/m²
1396 cd/m²	1372 cd/m²	1345 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1412 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1379.2 cd/m² Minimum: 0.95 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1384 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.05
CCT: 6514 K

	Samsung Galaxy S26+ LTPO-AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"	OnePlus 15 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"	Motorola Signature AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Screen		3%	12%	26%	14%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1384	1371 -1%	1114 -20%	1771 28%	1561 13%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1379	1370 -1%	1109 -20%	1773 29%	1547 12%
Brightness Distribution (%)	95	96 1%	97 2%	99 4%	99 4%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.8	2.7 4%	1.33 52%	1.3 54%	1.46 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.5	4.2 7%	2.42 46%	2.8 38%	3.63 19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	2 9%	1.9 14%	2.1 5%	2.5 -14%
Gamma	2.05 ^107%	2.03 ^108%	2.273 ^97%	2.25 ^98%	2.144 ^103%
CCT	6514 ^100%	6450 ^101%	6708 ^97%	6452 ^101%	6612 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3519 cd/m² +28%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2751 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2695 cd/m² -2%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2120 cd/m² -23%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4542 cd/m² +58%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3458 cd/m² +20%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2900 cd/m² +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2875 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz
Amplitude: 15.27 %
Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7914 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

彩色显示屏的亮度也是如此。三星高端手机在这方面的表现既不差也不特别好。在 "自然 "屏幕模式下，我们能获得最佳的色彩表现，肉眼仍能轻易辨别色彩偏差。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6195 ms rise
1.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.561 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.137 ms rise
3.79 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.648 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms).

大尺寸 OLED 面板具有稳定的视角，在户外也能给人留下深刻印象。即使在阳光直射下，显示内容依然清晰可见。不过，带有防反射涂层的 Ultra 机型明显更容易阅读。

性能 -Galaxy 手机中的新型三星芯片组

说到芯片组，三星又回到了老模式。虽然Galaxy S26 Ultra 也是基于骁龙 8 第五代精英版而欧洲 Plus 机型则配备了该公司自己的 Exynos 2600.三星 SoC 采用 2 纳米 GaA 工艺制造，拥有 10 个内核。其核心是主频为 3.8 GHz 的 ARM C1-Ultra。

这意味着Galaxy S26+ 的性能远远落后于单核心的代表但 Exynos 2600 的速度仍然很快，尽管它只比骁龙 8 精英版Galaxy在多核测试中，Exynos 2600 的速度与骁龙 8 Elite 相比仅有明显优势。Exynos 2600 在 Geekbench AI 中的表现非常出色。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3676 Points +15%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	3511 Points +9%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3498 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	3209 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3136 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (3060 - 3209, n=2)	3135 Points -2%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	2908 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=194, last 2 years)	1803 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	11034 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	11004 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (10388 - 11034, n=2)	10711 Points -3%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	10645 Points -4%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10378 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10029 Points -9%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	9678 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=194, last 2 years)	5349 Points -52%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	24396 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20673 Points +8%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19802 Points +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (19076 - 19914, n=2)	19495 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	19076 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18445 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=159, last 2 years)	15094 Points -21%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	13977 Points -27%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2598 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2309 Points +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (2098 - 2257, n=2)	2178 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2098 Points
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1698 Points -19%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	1289 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=105, last 2 years)	1202 Points -43%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	14678 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	13223 Points +16%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	13002 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (11422 - 12515, n=2)	11969 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	11422 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10756 Points -6%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	10533 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=127, last 2 years)	7817 Points -32%
System
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	20996 Points +65%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19202 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17481 Points +37%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	15554 Points +22%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	15456 Points +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (12733 - 14913, n=2)	13823 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	12733 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=127, last 2 years)	11525 Points -9%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	18501 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	16264 Points +22%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	15236 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (13372 - 16455, n=2)	14914 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	13372 Points
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	10713 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=127, last 2 years)	8914 Points -33%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	8243 Points -38%
Graphics
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	52659 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	51530 Points +21%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	48863 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	45691 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	42732 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (42333 - 42732, n=2)	42533 Points 0%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	37773 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=127, last 2 years)	26937 Points -37%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2353 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (2321 - 2361, n=2)	2341 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2321 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2319 Points 0%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2221 Points -4%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	2109 Points -9%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	1968 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=127, last 2 years)	1729 Points -26%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	23141 Points +5%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	22665 Points +3%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	22592 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (22076 - 22393, n=2)	22235 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	22076 Points
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=116, last 2 years)	20239 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19236 Points -13%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	16866 Points -24%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=94, last 2 years)	17247 Points +763%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (1998 - 2079, n=2)	2039 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	1998 Points
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1915 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1891 Points -5%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	Points -100%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	756 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (753 - 756, n=2)	755 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=91, last 2 years)	721 Points -5%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	655 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	559 Points -26%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	409 Points -46%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	192 Points -75%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=91, last 2 years)	2945 Points +284%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	767 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (759 - 767, n=2)	763 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	561 Points -27%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	502 Points -35%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	410 Points -47%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	176 Points -77%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=91, last 2 years)	4327 Points +167%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (1621 - 1623, n=2)	1622 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	1621 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1285 Points -21%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1023 Points -37%
Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 16384	895 Points -45%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	436 Points -73%

集成三星 Xclipse 960用于图形计算。Galaxy S26+ 在 3DMark 测试中取得了极高的分数。GPU 在 GFXBench 中也取得了优异成绩。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7232 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7198 Points 0%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6985 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6959 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6885 Points -5%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5533 Points -23%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7206 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7167 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7029 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7021 Points -3%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6969 Points -3%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5613 Points -22%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	30621 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26896 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26616 Points -1%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25978 Points -3%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25885 Points -4%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	21167 Points -21%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14788 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13785 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13036 Points -5%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12546 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12400 Points -10%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9725 Points -29%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14635 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13696 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12747 Points -7%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12559 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12242 Points -11%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9698 Points -29%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3212 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3198 Points 0%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2886 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2704 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2525 Points -21%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2032 Points -37%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3265 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3211 Points -2%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2871 Points -12%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2736 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2698 Points -17%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2078 Points -36%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	954 fps +38%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	762 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	697 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	689 fps
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	684 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	579 fps -16%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	606 fps +38%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	458 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	450 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	439 fps
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	359 fps -18%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	341 fps -22%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	369 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	344 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	343 fps 0%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	340 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	283 fps -18%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	283 fps -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	104 fps -13%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	205 fps -7%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	199 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	198 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	178 fps -19%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	167 fps -24%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	105 fps -1%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -43%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -43%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	114 fps -4%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	109 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps -10%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	95 fps -20%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	92 fps -23%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	313 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	296 fps -5%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	287 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	286 fps -9%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	240 fps -23%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	233 fps -26%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50 fps -11%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	48 fps -14%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	44 fps -21%
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	42 fps -25%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 5

Jetstream 2
2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	334.386 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	281.459 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (273 - 281, n=2)	277 Points -2%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)	180.603 Points -36%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	165.891 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=125, last 2 years)	156.2 Points -45%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	146.211 Points -48%
2.2 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	354.246 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (n=1)	354 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=73, last 2 years)	219 Points -38%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)	165.391 Points -53%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	29 runs/min +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (27.1 - 28.3, n=2)	27.7 runs/min +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	27.1 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	25.1 runs/min -7%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	21.3 runs/min -21%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)	19.2 runs/min -29%
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=109, last 2 years)	14.9 runs/min -45%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	98817 Points +16%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	98523 Points +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (85043 - 92374, n=2)	88709 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	85043 Points
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	58421 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=163, last 2 years)	50223 Points -41%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)	39707 Points -53%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=136, last 2 years)	1091 ms * -181%
Motorola Signature (Chrome 145)	816.8 ms * -111%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)	522.8 ms * -35%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	388.7 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	387.8 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (374 - 388, n=2)	381 ms * +2%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	315.6 ms * +19%

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Average Samsung Exynos 2600 (91 - 95, n=2)	93 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	91 Points
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 95, n=8, last 2 years)	61.5 Points -32%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S26+	Samsung Galaxy S25+	OnePlus 15	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra	Motorola Signature	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		50%	54%	115%	130%	55%	24%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3574.74	4057.35 14%	3962.2 11%	4064.33 14%	4049.69 13%	3626 ?(1493 - 4384, n=53) 1%	2202 ?(270 - 4370, n=176, last 2 years) -38%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	2543.31	3311.02 30%	3741.2 47%	3987.65 57%	3774.28 48%	2659 ?(555 - 3484, n=53) 5%	1877 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=176, last 2 years) -26%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	419.84	294.51 -30%	352.6 -16%	575.86 37%	613.85 46%	382 ?(218 - 513, n=53) -9%	301 ?(47.6 - 614, n=176, last 2 years) -28%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	122.63	351.16 186%	334.4 173%	551.82 350%	628.08 412%	396 ?(50.7 - 989, n=53) 223%	355 ?(9.4 - 1071, n=176, last 2 years) 189%

排放量 - 带热点的三星手机

温度

在持续加载的情况下，我们测得某些地方的表面温度超过 47 °C。温度不算低，但也不算高。散热性能与前代产品类似高效；在 3DMark 压力测试中，我们实现了高达 40% 的适度节流。不过，Galay S26+ 有时能在更长时间内保持最高性能。

Max. Load

Idle


46.3 °C	44.5 °C	41.9 °C
47.5 °C	43.7 °C	40.7 °C
45.9 °C	45.1 °C	36.5 °C

Maximum: 47.5 °C
Average: 43.6 °C


40.6 °C	44.8 °C	46.9 °C
39.7 °C	41.7 °C	46.9 °C
37 °C	40.9 °C	45.6 °C

Maximum: 46.9 °C
Average: 42.7 °C

Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	66.6 % +10%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61.9 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.4 % -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.6 %
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	52 % -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.3 % -14%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	65.3 % +8%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.9 % -3%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Signature Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	67.4 % +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.5 % +5%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63.6 %

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.2 (25.6-42.9)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.5 (19.9-38.9)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø110.7 (95.2-156.9)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84.2 (71.3-133.4)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø150 (129.5-161.9)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø114.4 (89.3-165.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26.8 (23-41.1)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø34.5 (28.6-47.1)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.9 (21.4-36.3)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø17.3 (15-23.7)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12 (10.9-16.3)

发言人

Plus 机型的优势之一是其出色的扬声器。我们的粉红噪声测量显示，中音和高音的频率响应相当均匀，只有超级高音扬声器稍有下降。此外，还能感受到一丝低音。

此外，还可以通过 USB-C 端口输出音频，Galaxy S26+ 还可以启动 Auracast 广播。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Galaxy S26 Plus 仍配备 "微型电池"

耗电量

Galaxy S26+ 的功耗并不明显，与其前代产品的功耗相近。前代的骁龙芯片组.

4,900 毫安时的电池可以用 45 瓦的有线和 15 瓦的无线充电，既不是特别大，也不能真正快速充电。当完全放电时，三星手机只需要一个多小时就能充满。小米移动电源.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.11 / 0.26 Watt
Idle	0.56 / 1.28 / 1.31 Watt
Load	12.38 / 16.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S26+ 4900 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	OnePlus 15 7300 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 6500 mAh	Motorola Signature 5200 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 2600	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		7%	-17%	3%	-16%	9%	-3%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.56	0.45 20%	1.2 -114%	0.87 -55%	0.8 -43%	0.505 ?(0.45 - 0.56, n=2) 10%	0.87 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=143, last 2 years) -55%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.28	1.09 15%	1.4 -9%	1.29 -1%	1.3 -2%	1.015 ?(0.75 - 1.28, n=2) 21%	1.453 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=143, last 2 years) -14%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.31	1.13 14%	1.8 -37%	1.33 -2%	1.7 -30%	1.12 ?(0.93 - 1.31, n=2) 15%	1.641 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=143, last 2 years) -25%
Load Average * (Watt)	12.38	14.41 -16%	6.7 46%	8.84 29%	11.8 5%	12.4 ?(12.4 - 12.4, n=2) -0%	6.75 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=113, last 2 years) 45%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	16.9	16.37 3%	12.3 27%	9.15 46%	18.7 -11%	16.8 ?(16.8 - 16.9, n=2) 1%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=113, last 2 years) 33%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.01 (0.734-16.8)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.19 (0.617-16.3)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.831 (0.778-1.217)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.631-0.897)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.5 (6.35-16.5)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.4 (9.58-16.3)

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.831 (0.778-1.217)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.631-0.897)

电池寿命

在我们进行的实际电池测试（显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m²）中，这款手机在 WLAN 测试中的续航时间几乎达到了 18 小时，但采用高通 SoC 的前代手机则要长出约 2 小时。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 146)		17h 45min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Samsung Galaxy S26+ 4900 mAh	17.8 h
Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	19.8 h
OnePlus 15 7300 mAh	30.7 h
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 6500 mAh	21.9 h
Motorola Signature 5200 mAh	19.7 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Galaxy S26+ 是一款非常出色的智能手机，但命名为 "Galaxy S25+ (2026) "会更合适。

Back to the verdict

Samsung Galaxy S26+ - 04/10/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

93%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

71 / 69 → 100%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

91%

Games Performance

44 / 55 → 80%

Application Performance

84 / 85 → 98%

AI Performance

47%

Temperature

84%

Noise

100%

Audio

80 / 90 → 88%

Camera

83%

Average

82%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
91.7%

Materials
75%

Packaging
95%

Power Use
95.4%

Repairability
60%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 86.2%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 89%	Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 960 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 1249€	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI LTPO-AMOLED
2. 88.4%	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	List Price: 1149 Euro	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3. 87.1%	OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	List Price: 999€	215 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED
4. 88.2%	Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	List Price: 900€	220 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED
5. 87.9%	Motorola Signature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	List Price: 1000 Euro	186 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.80" 2780x1264 450 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

三星本可以拯救自己的智能手机--三星Galaxy S26+ 评测

无心插柳柳成荫。

三星Galaxy S26+ 的评价

Pros

Cons

三星Galaxy S26 Plus 的价格和供货情况

Table of Contents

三星Galaxy S26+ 的规格

手机壳 - IP 防水三星手机

尺寸比较

功能 -Android 电话，带 USB 3.2 接口

软件 -Galaxy 手机的长时间更新

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Android 带有 5G 和 WiFi 的手机 7

电话功能和语音质量 -Galaxy S26 Plus（带 eSIM 卡

相机 - 三星手机没有升级

附件和保修 -Android 不带电源装置的电话

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S26 Plus，带超声波传感器

显示屏 - 大型 OLED 屏幕，带 PWM 调光功能，但...

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 -Galaxy 手机中的新型三星芯片组

排放量 - 带热点的三星手机

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Samsung Galaxy S26+ audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis

电池续航时间 -Galaxy S26 Plus 仍配备 "微型电池"

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可比较的替代品

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles