Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar申科XMG Pro 15 E23 (PD50SND-G)游戏笔记本电脑评测：为工作和游戏的平衡干杯!
Schenker笔记本电脑定期更新，去年我们回顾了XMG Pro 15的两个前身。其中一款配备了Tiger Lake CPU，一台配备 桤木湖并都配备了RTX 3080。在处理器方面，我们的审查设备配备了最新的猛禽湖一代，并选择了一个NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060.但是，这款笔记本电脑不仅得到了内部调整，因为设计也得到了轻微改造。该设备现在是基于Clevo PD50SND-G裸机。
与前代产品的比较很有意思，因为尽管显卡现在源自Nvidia最新的Ada Lovelace一代，但其等级已从80级降至60级。另一个配置选项是以下列形式提供的RTX 4070.这两块显卡的运行功率均为140至150瓦。Pro 15 E23已经成功地投入了令人印象深刻的性能，它在与游戏笔记本的比较中站得住脚，如 戴尔G15 5530或Aorus 15X ASF.稍微超过这个水平的是华硕ZenBook Pro 14 Duo.然而，这款多媒体笔记本电脑在当前许多作品中也拥有高帧数。
CLEVO PD50SND-G
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 162 W PL2 / Short Burst, 132 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost)
Memory
32 GB
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, BOE0AD1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, 1024 GB
, 900 GB free
Weight
2.4 kg
Price
2400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.2 % | 07/2023 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
| 86.9 % | 07/2022 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
| 84.2 % | 06/2023 | Dell G15 5530 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 26.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % | 06/2023 | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.2 % | 04/2023 | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
| 87 % | 06/2023 | Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 21 mm | 14.50" | 2880x1800 | |
| 82.4 % | 04/2023 | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.4 % | 06/2023 | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
外壳和特征 - 金属含量高
与前代产品相比，Pro 15 E23得到了一些小的细节调整。受影响的基本上是笔记本电脑侧面的通风口以及RJ45插槽和USB-C插槽的位置互换。现在所有的USB接口都可以在设备的侧面找到。
设计仍然是低调的，黑色，基本上没有品牌。笔记本电脑的尺寸和重量都与前代产品几乎相同。笔记本电脑的显示屏盖和外壳底部继续由铝制成，而外壳的顶部则由塑料制成。显示屏被一个宽大的塑料边框所包围，边框只有5毫米厚，顶部有一厘米，底部有两厘米。通过扭动屏幕和底座，有可能从屏幕上发出一点吱吱嘎嘎的声音。但是，为了做到这一点，必须付出相当大的努力，因为笔记本电脑的所有部件都是非常好的结构和固体。键盘和显示器盖子只有在施加很大压力时才会有一些弯曲，而铰链则牢牢地将显示器保持在0°和135°之间的每个可以想象的位置。
SD卡阅读器、Wi-Fi和网络摄像头
Das Pro 15拥有，至少与许多其他游戏笔记本电脑相比，一个microSD读卡器。结合我们的AV Pro microSD（V60），我们记录了良好的传输速度，在80至90 MB/s之间。
在6GHz网络中，笔记本电脑的英特尔Wi-Fi 6E AX211显示了大部分优秀的数据速度，但在5GHz网络中，当涉及到传输速度时，它返回了相当低的平均数字。
对于流媒体来说，内置的全高清网络摄像头的质量可能是不够的，特别是在恶劣的照明条件下。然而，它可以用于偶尔的视频通话。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1573 (821-1638)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1406 (1285-1499)
Alienware x16 R1 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1229 (817-1342)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1627 (1547-1643)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1577 (1301-1639)
Alienware x16 R1 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (955-1382)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø924 (475-965)
Dell G15 5530 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1500-1697)
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1229 (589-1505)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1567 (1367-1661)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1606 (1267-1656)
Alienware x16 R1 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1022 (714-1142)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø924 (471-948)
Dell G15 5530 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1539 (1454-1570)
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1180 (1047-1233)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1677 (1641-1711)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1634-1714)
Alienware x16 R1 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1295 (1225-1358)
27.3 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
19 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
附件和维护
整整15颗螺丝固定了底盖。拧开这些螺丝后，借助于一个塑料开启工具，可以很容易地从前面撬开盖子。在它的下面，你会发现可更换的内存和一个免费的M.2插槽，用于额外的SSD。笔记本电脑中还包括适当的热垫，以及一张带有驱动程序的光盘，一个具有相同内容的U盘，一个大鼠标垫和一个开瓶器。
输入设备 - 一个全尺寸的RGB键盘
XMG Pro 15的输入设备包括一个带有指纹扫描仪的12×7厘米的点击板和一个带有数字键盘的全尺寸键盘。两者都有令人愉快的触觉和切实的压力点。就键盘而言，键程约为1.5毫米。所有的按键都可以用RGB灯光单独照明。
显示屏 - 一个240赫兹的QHD和DisplayP3
虽然它不是OLED，但XMG Pro 15拥有良好的G-Sync、IPS显示屏。在240赫兹和2,560 × 1,660像素下，sRGB和DisplayP3色彩空间几乎被完全覆盖。然而，在全亮度下，300cd/m²的显示屏在屏幕中间的亮度明显高于边缘的亮度，这一点稍显明显。然而，与前代产品不同，这并不表现为明显可见的屏幕出血。
与上一代机型相比，该显示器的响应时间基本没有变化。帧率已经从165赫兹升级到240赫兹。我们没有发现任何屏幕闪动。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE0AD1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 322 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 301.4 cd/m² Minimum: 326 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Contrast: 894:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.98
ΔE Greyscale 2.44 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) BOE0AD1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) BOE09C2 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Dell G15 5530 AUO B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Aorus 15X ASF BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF AU Optronics B156HAN15.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Alienware x16 R1 BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -13% | -16% | -48% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 97.8 | 97.5 0% | 73.1 -25% | 69.3 -29% | 42.3 -57% | 99.2 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 98.4 -2% | 98.2 -2% | 62.6 -37% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.4 | 85.2 0% | 74.4 -13% | 70.5 -17% | 43.7 -49% | 88.6 4% |
| Response Times | 7% | 60% | 7% | -52% | 29% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 13.2 ? 6% | 3.39 ? 76% | 12.4 ? 11% | 22 ? -57% | 5.1 ? 64% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 8.8 ? 8% | 5.35 ? 44% | 9.4 ? 2% | 14 ? -46% | 10.3 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 21620 ? | |||||
| Screen | -33% | -25% | 24% | -22% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 322 | 317 -2% | 320 -1% | 316 -2% | 247 -23% | 302.2 -6% |
| Brightness | 301 | 294 -2% | 316 5% | 301 0% | 234 -22% | 285 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 83 -2% | 94 11% | 90 6% | 89 5% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.32 11% | 0.21 42% | 0.28 22% | 0.25 31% | 0.26 28% |
| Contrast | 894 | 991 11% | 1524 70% | 1129 26% | 988 11% | 1162 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.98 | 4.22 -113% | 4.55 -130% | 1.54 22% | 3.78 -91% | 1.63 18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.24 | 5.97 -14% | 9.83 -88% | 2.46 53% | 6.42 -23% | 4.13 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.98 | 4.09 -107% | 1.51 24% | 1.21 39% | 3.94 -99% | 1.17 41% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.44 | 4.41 -81% | 6.2 -154% | 1.3 47% | 2.16 11% | 2.5 -2% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.29 96% | 2.07 106% | 2.307 95% | 2.33 94% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6984 93% | 6733 97% | 6479 100% | 6456 101% | 6906 94% | 6590 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-20% | 7% /
-10% | 5% /
13% | -41% /
-32% | 15% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
在Calman ColorChecker中，XMG Pro 15的颜色和灰度分别为ΔΕ1,98和ΔΕ2,44，明显位于ΔΕ<3的目标范围内。我们自己的ICC配置文件（在信息框中下载）应该能够稍微减少过度强调的蓝色，并明显改善灰度和色彩再现。加上几乎完全覆盖的DisplayP3色彩空间，我们正在处理的显示器似乎适合专业视频编辑。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
在户外也可以使用这台15英寸的笔记本电脑，这要归功于其哑光和相对明亮的显示屏。根据不同的地点，你必须选择适当的视角，以便体验尽可能少的反射。幸运的是，IPS面板拥有非常稳定的可视角度。
性能--英特尔酷睿i9和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060具有持久的动力
在我们的审查设备中，一个强大的英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060负责提供足够的动力，能够处理游戏和大多数创造性任务。这款笔记本电脑可以配置8到64GB的DDR5内存。我们的审查样本配备了32GB。典型的申克，在Bestware的订购过程中，可以选择许多不同的选项。除了RTX 4060之外，RTX 4070也是可配置的。当涉及到固态硬盘和WiFi选项时，也有多种选择。
测试条件
各种性能级别--性能模式、娱乐模式、节能模式和静音模式，都可以通过控制中心选择。此外，在性能模式下，还可以选择对GPU和显存进行轻微超频。英特尔酷睿i9的供电功率最大为135瓦，GeForce RTX 4060的供电功率为140瓦，如果将25瓦从处理器切换到显卡上。以下目标值适用于各个节能模式：
| 模式： | 性能模式 | 娱乐模式 | 节能模式 | 静音模式 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cpu pl1 | 135 w | 65 w | 55 w | 45 w |
| cpu pl2 | 162 w | 115 w | 115 w | 115 w |
| 目标温度 CPU | 93 ℃ | 87 ℃ | 85 ℃ | 85 ℃ |
| GPU TGP + Dynamic Boost | 115 W + 25 W | 115 W + 0 W | 115 W + 0 W | 115 W + 0 W |
| 目标温度 GPU | 87 °C | 87 °C | 87 °C | 87 °C |
我们编制的日志显示，在娱乐和性能模式下，这台游戏笔记本可以承受非常高的性能提升，时间长达90秒。申克建议在娱乐模式下进行日常任务。然而，我们决定在性能模式下执行所有的基准测试。
处理器
芯片英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX是当前猛禽湖一代中最强大的笔记本电脑处理器。这个CPU能够同时处理分布在8个P核和16个E核的32个线程。由于其较高的PL1和PL2值，i9真正显示了它所拥有的潜力，XMG Pro 15在处理器基准测试中超过了所有其他设备。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3332 (3186.24-3913.13)
Dell G15 5530 Intel Core i7-13650HX: Ø2985 (2897.29-3146.63)
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2776 (2691.43-3460.13)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2497 (2154.13-2705.63)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1776 (1635.52-2155.04)
Alienware x16 R1 Intel Core i9-13900HK: Ø2834 (2768.93-2949.63)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 -1! | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=233, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，该评测设备也交出了强劲的数据，甚至超过了 Aorus 15X ASF尽管共享相似的TDP和TGP值。在PCMark 10中，XMG Pro 15仅比纤薄的Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo。这表明，强大的游戏笔记本电脑并不总是必须是一个沉重的游戏笔记本电脑。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=198, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7521 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years) | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在这个领域，值得注意的是，Nvidia驱动和其他驱动之间的互动问题，在此期间已经被克服。在这台笔记本电脑上，在测试时，DPC的延迟在目前的驱动程序和固件中处于较低水平。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
在Schenker为XMG Pro 15提供的所有NVMe SSD中，Crucial P5 Plus可能不是最快的选择。然而，在测试中，它提供了良好的价值，并在较长的时间内保持。在DiskSpd循环中，我们只观察到相当多的运行后的最小节流情况。
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
Sequential Read:
3333.37MB/s
Sequential Write:
2633.33MB/s
4K Read:
59.24MB/s
4K Write:
165.94MB/s
4K-64 Read:
2156.47MB/s
4K-64 Write:
2172.75MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.053ms
Access Time Write:
0.024ms
Score Read:
2549Points
Score Write:
2602Points
Score Total:
6430Points
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø6581 (5718.09-6666.34)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø4217 (1288.22-6884.74)
Dell G15 5530 SSTC CL4-3D512-Q11: Ø1870 (750.15-3008.78)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6780 (4751.1-7024.62)
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø6920 (6432.52-6948.23)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB: Ø3610 (3316.15-3652.15)
Alienware x16 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6459 (3458.84-7110.81)
图形卡
现在我们来谈谈我们评论的核心问题。芯片能不能NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060能否在我们的评测设备上跟上前代的RTX 3080 Ti?对这个问题的诚实回答是明确的是和不是。根据不同的基准，你将不得不考虑减少10％至20％的性能。在游戏中，目前的XMG Pro 15和前代产品之间的性能差异取决于游戏。虽然像《Witcher 3 》这样的游戏得益于4060的更高时钟速度，实现了更高的帧率，但在《GTA V》中，Pro 15 E23有些落后于前代产品。然而，XMG Pro 15也可以配置一个RTX 4070.这款Aorus 15X ASF显示，RTX 3080 Ti和RTX 4070之间的性能差异非常低 - 在任何情况下。由于Aorus和XMG Pro 15的TDP和TGP值几乎相同，这表明XMG Pro 15在使用RTX 4070时可能会出现的性能。
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0 | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | V-Ray 5 Benchmark
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 29518 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 146918 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 54429 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23131 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10776 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Alienware x16 R1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) | |
| Aorus 15X ASF | |
| Dell G15 5530 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:High T | |
| Average of class Gaming (35 - 125.9, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (42.8 - 45, n=4) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T | |
| Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 166.1, n=25, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (61.9 - 91.9, n=6) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.8 - 186.5, n=24, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (70.8 - 107.7, n=6) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
| GTA V (2015) | 184.5 | 178.9 | 170.6 | 107.2 | 87 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 112 | 159.7 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 210 | 182.9 | 176.1 | 154.3 | 126.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 154.9 | 135.9 | 111 | 102 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 377 | 267 | 213 | 183.3 | 127.5 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 142 | 94 | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 80.6 | 48.56 | ||||
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 89.29 | 60.01 | ||||
| F1 22 (2022) | 245 | 235 | 179.8 | 66.4 | 43 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 91 | 66 | ||||
| Hogwarts Legacy (2023) | 90.4 | 70.8 | 64 | 44.4 |
排放和能源--安静的扬声器和响亮的风扇
噪声排放
不幸的是，在测试中，XMG Pro 15证明自己非常吵。在满载的情况下，使用激活的性能模式，在15厘米的距离上，我们在Prime95和Furmark中测得整整53分贝（A）。不过，风扇还有其他的花招。我们的经验表明，娱乐模式也能为许多游戏提供足够的性能。这大大降低了笔记本电脑发出的噪音水平。在没有3D应用的正常使用中，你甚至可以期待非常安静的无声操作。这至少有助于它与前代产品相比在前面有一个小鼻子。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 24 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 53.65 / 53.65 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Dell G15 5530 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, SSTC CL4-3D512-Q11 | Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM | Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB | Alienware x16 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HK, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | 7% | 14% | -13% | -13% | -25% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 20.41 15% | 23.3 3% | 25 -4% | 25.2 -5% | 27 -13% | 22.7 5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23 4% | 26.85 -12% | 23.3 3% | 28 -17% | 25.2 -5% | 27 -13% | 23.1 4% |
| Idle Average * | 24 | 31.22 -30% | 26.85 -12% | 23.3 3% | 29 -21% | 25.2 -5% | 37.5 -56% | 25.8 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24 | 33.09 -38% | 26.85 -12% | 23.3 3% | 36 -50% | 32.5 -35% | 38 -58% | 25.8 -8% |
| Load Average * | 53.65 | 56.35 -5% | 27.65 48% | 29.6 45% | 50 7% | 59.7 -11% | 56.3 -5% | 39.3 27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.53 | 56.89 -6% | 47.9 11% | 43 20% | 54 -1% | 49.9 7% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 53.65 | 56.89 -6% | 47.86 11% | 43 20% | 58 -8% | 60.9 -14% | 56.3 -5% | 54.8 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在压力测试中，XMG Pro 15的表面温度高达50℃，比许多竞争对手的温度要高得多。然而，首先，我们只讨论相对较小的热点，其次，基本单元的表面是由塑料制成的。在接触时，这使得高温显得明显较低。在游戏时，将键盘描述为凉爽是不对的，但它不会，然而，感觉到令人不快的温暖。笔记本电脑的性能也不会随着时间的推移而被扼杀。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell G15 5530 Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Alienware x16 R1 Intel Core i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | -9% | 11% | 13% | 9% | 15% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 57 -14% | 54 -8% | 48.9 2% | 42 16% | 37.1 26% | 47.5 5% | 47.2 6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 52 -4% | 62.2 -24% | 44.6 11% | 51 -2% | 49.4 1% | 35.5 29% | 47.8 4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 33 | 32 3% | 33.4 -1% | 27.1 18% | 27 18% | 30 9% | 27.7 16% | 36.8 -12% |
| Idle Bottom * | 32 | 34 -6% | 33.4 -4% | 27.5 14% | 26 19% | 32.4 -1% | 29.5 8% | 35.8 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
XMG Pro 15的两个扬声器的平均感知音量仅为72.5 dB(A)。许多频率范围都明显低于风扇在负载下的音量。因此，当游戏时，耳机或外部扬声器是必须的。这些可以通过3.5毫米耳机插孔、蓝牙或通过3.5毫米连接器的光学S/PDIF连接。使用这种方法，还可以将环绕声系统直接连接到电脑上。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.52 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
根据其类别，Schenker XMG Pro 15不是一个节能的奇迹。它包括一个大型PSU，可以提供高达280瓦的功率。当与游戏笔记本一起使用时，这意味着它仍然有一点剩余的储备。在Prime95压力测试和Furmark测试中，它的最大功率为269瓦，但平均功率更像是215瓦。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.07 / 2.8 Watt |
| Idle | 21.6 / 29 / 42.7 Watt |
| Load |
190 / 269 Watt |
   
| |
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø188.8 (168.85-204.21)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø215 (195.91-268.73)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø29 (13.104-57.116)
Power consumption with an external monitor
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø138.4 (117.57-184.5)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø176.5 (175.98-177.03)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø119.3 (67.86-195.66)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø215 (177.98-228.01)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø183.4 (179.28-187.29)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø31.5 (28.873-53.911)
电池寿命
在我们的Wi-Fi上网测试中，XMG Pro 15 E23不能超过6小时。然而，对于80Wh的电池来说，没有什么可以期待的。不过，当涉及到dGPU的睡眠模式时，评测设备有一个小问题。 它并不总是可靠地打开，但Schenker意识到这个问题，并正在努力解决。
| SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Dell G15 5530 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -3% | -22% | 28% | 23% | 71% | 27% | -60% | -10% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 343.1 | 349 2% | 391 14% | 701 104% | 489 43% | 542 58% | 452 32% | 149 -57% | 367 ? 7% |
| Load | 115 | 106 -8% | 50 -57% | 59 -49% | 118 3% | 212 84% | 140 22% | 44 -62% | 84.4 ? -27% |
| H.264 | 316 | 405 | 747 | 472 | 480 | 400 ? | |||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 47 | 80.6 ? | |||||||
| Reader / Idle | 679 | 817 | 436 | 543 ? |
Pros
+ 金属含量高的光滑外壳
+ 合适的键盘
+ 精彩的端口选择
+ 具有持久力的硬件
+ QHD显示屏
+ VR就绪
Cons
- 显示屏响应时间太慢，无法达到240赫兹
- 缓慢的microSD读卡器
- 风扇声音大，扬声器声音小
- 没有后置USB
结论 - 完美的工作与娱乐平衡
XMG Pro 15 E23被宣传为一个游戏工作站。在我们的审查中，它满足了一个良好的中端游戏笔记本电脑的所有要求，但也有许多方面使它成为一个体面的视频和电影工作的笔记本电脑。不起眼的设计丝毫没有反映出这款15.6英寸设备的雷鸣般的性能。开箱即用，申克公司完善了一个坚实的裸机，配备了良好的输入设备和强大的端口选择，以及优质的组件。
前代产品的一些缺点已经被大大减少或完全消除了。现在，固态硬盘在高速下稳定运行，显示屏更加明亮，音量也略有调整。这款游戏笔记本可能仍然不安静，但它现在知道什么时候该表现得正确了。
XMG Pro 15 E23的一些锯齿状边缘已经被磨平，这意味着这款游戏笔记本现在只带有一些小的烦扰。
没有明显的负面因素。缺少一个后置USB端口是相当不幸的，这意味着只有无线鼠标和键盘的设置才能实现无线缆的桌面。任何不希望长期将笔记本电脑推向性能极限的人都会喜欢使用安静的娱乐模式。大多数游戏也运行良好。只有240赫兹的QHD显示屏的缓慢响应时间困扰着我们。同时，与竞争对手的区别，如Aorus 15X ASF或 MSI Cyborg 15的区别只能在细节上找到。任何着眼于一个更令人兴奋的游戏笔记本电脑的人最好看看阿利安人x16 R1或华硕ROG Strix G16- 但你将不会得到更多的动力回报。
价格和可用性
XMG Pro 15可以在Bestware进行配置。 如果没有Windows，没有固态硬盘和最低数量的内存，这款笔记本的起价为1893欧元。我们的评测设备不含Windows 11，价格为2150欧元。对于激活的Windows 11家庭版，Bestware要求再加100欧元。申克公司显然没有遵循价格螺旋上升的规律。去年， Pro 15 E22配有RTX 3070 Ti，32GB内存和1TB固态硬盘，价格为2510欧元。对于配备RTX 4070、32GB内存和1TB固态硬盘的E23，Bestware的要价为2400欧元。
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (E23)
-
07/04/2023 v7
Marc Herter
Gaming - Weighted Average
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
