华硕TUF游戏A15笔记本评测--拥有RTX4050和144Hz屏幕的预算玩家

Name: Asus TUF A15 FA507
Brand: Asus

对1080p来说是完美的。 华硕的TUF Gaming A15由于采用了AMD Ryzen处理器和GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop，在1080p下提供了良好的游戏性能。它的144-Hz IPS面板看起来也很棒。那么，这是一个完美的预算游戏机吗？

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/15/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook Windows

位于ROG系列之下，华硕的TUF游戏系列旨在为游戏玩家提供更便宜的笔记本电脑选择。我们最近测试了16英寸模型与AMD硬件现在是时候看看15英寸的版本了：配备AMD处理器（Ryzen 7 7735HS）的TUF Gaming A15。Ryzen 7 7735HS)和当前的Nvidia显卡(GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop).它的MRSP约为1,300美元，目前可以在网上找到，价格为1,169美元。此外，该设备有一个刷新率为144赫兹的哑光IPS面板，16GB内存和512GB NVMe SSD。FA507NU-LP031的零售版没有操作系统，但我们收到时已经安装了Windows 11 Home。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF A15 FA507

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 8 x 3.2 - 4.8 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-HS Refresh

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 2355 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 95 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 531.68, Advanced Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, 2 Slots, max. 64 GB

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, N156HMA-GA1, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, 512 GB

, 420 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo

Networking

Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24.9 x 354 x 251

Battery

90 Wh, 5675 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 240W PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.154 kg, Power Supply: 735 g

Price

1199 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.3 %	06/2023	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81.8 %	04/2023	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2 kg	23.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.9 %	01/2023	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	23 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
82.9 %	03/2023	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
81 %	01/2023	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23.6 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.8 %	10/2022	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
87.2 %	03/2022	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	24.95 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

案例--低调的游戏笔记本，没有照明

与其采用英特尔处理器的前代产品相比，TUF Gaming F15，这款笔记本的外壳设计几乎没有变化。只有一些小的区别，如WASD键不再是白色的，盖子的四个角现在有小条而不是圆圈。目前的型号仍然没有任何花哨的照明功能，总的来说，这款笔记本电脑采用了相当低调的深灰色外观。特别是沿着屏幕的底边相当大，因为笔记本电脑仍然采用16：9的比例。你很可能需要经常清洁它的深色表面，因为它们很容易收集指纹印。

笔记本电脑的盖子是由金属制成的，箱子的其余部分是塑料。底部装置足够稳定，但你可以很容易地推到键盘的中间。虽然，当你试图扭动和弯曲设备时，它不会发出任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。它的薄盖子不是最好的，因为当你用很小的压力压住它或试图改变打开角度（最大~135度）时，屏幕已经开始出现干扰了。

从尺寸上看，所有的竞争对手都很相似--但TUF Gaming A15拥有最小的蓝图。它的重量刚刚超过2.1公斤，使笔记本电脑相对便携，你很可能会把它装进大多数背包或袋子里。附带的240瓦电源的重量为额外的735克。

尺寸比较

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Gigabyte G5 KE MSI Katana 15 B12VEK SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Asus TUF A15 FA507 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 华硕已经包括了USB 4

基本单元的后面部分被冷却装置占据，几乎所有的端口都位于设备的左侧。只有一个USB端口在右侧。如果你使用所有的端口，空间可能会变得有点紧张。有两个USB-C端口，其中一个支持USB 4.0，另一个支持G-Sync，如果你连接一个相应的显示器。

左侧：电源、以太网、HDMI 2.1 FRL、USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort、Power Delivery）、USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10 GBit/s、Power Delivery、DisplayPort、G-Sync）、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s）、3.5耳机插孔

对：USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s），Kensington安全端口

沟通

除了千兆以太网端口外，该笔记本电脑还使用了联发科MT7921无线局域网模块，支持Wi-Fi 6和160-MHz频段的连接。然而，其最大传输速率为1200比特/秒。在我们使用华硕的参考路由器进行的测试中，这些速率得到了证实，虽然它们是体面的，但市场上肯定有更快的WLAN模块。在一天结束时，这不应该在日常使用中造成任何问题（例如，在下载内容时）。

Networking
Asus TUF A15 FA507 MediaTek MT7921
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	985 (min: 902) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	917 (min: 797) MBit/s ∼54%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1622 (min: 823) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1686 (min: 1451) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	979 (min: 901) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	952 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	980 (min: 495) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	934 (min: 918) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1529 (min: 623) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1666 (min: 840) MBit/s ∼99%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr MediaTek MT7921
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	816 (min: 759) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	811 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼48%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Realtek RTL8852BE
iperf3 receive AXE11000	927 (min: 864) MBit/s ∼55%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12	1045 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	1445 (min: 1383) MBit/s ∼100%

Asus TUF A15 FA507; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø985 (902-1065)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (797-933)

网络摄像头

尽管TUF Gaming A15的摄像头有一个凸起，但它只能达到720p，即使在良好的照明条件下也很难拍出像样的照片。它的锐利度极低，颜色也描绘得不是很准确。

ColorChecker Asus TUF A15 FA507: 17.85 ∆E min: 10.63 - max: 26.82 ∆E

维护

底部的机箱盖与设备的其他部分连接得很紧--即使在松开螺丝之后。拆卸机箱的这一部分被证明是有点麻烦的。一旦你这样做了，你就可以接触到两个内存插槽、电池、风扇和M.2 2280 SSD。

输入设备 - 带有数字键盘的大键盘

键盘有一个专门的数字键盘，在上面打字很舒服。然而，问题在于键盘上的标签。除了WASD键是白色的外，其他所有的键都有透明的标签。因此，即使在良好的照明条件下，启动背光灯通常也会更舒适。有三个照明级别，你也可以选择自己的颜色--在一个区域内。它的布局很好，但你必须习惯于单行的回车键。在常规键盘的上方，还有四个特殊的按键：三个是用来控制音量的，一个可以个人分配。必须说，对于一台游戏笔记本来说，方向键特别小。

触摸板工作得很好--普通的手指运动可以顺利输入，其表面有很好的感觉。它的点击噪音也很好，很安静。总的来说，性能稳定，当然，大多数用户会转向使用外部鼠标或控制器，反正。

显示屏 - 144-Hz的IPS面板

这台笔记本电脑有一个相对简单的哑光IPS面板，分辨率为全高清（1,920 x 1,080像素），格式为16：9。主观上，它给我们留下了相当好的印象--内容被描绘得足够清晰，浅色区域看起来没有颗粒感。它的144赫兹刷新率有助于快速移动，而且没有PWM闪烁，但总的来说，这块屏幕并没有什么值得称道的地方。

广告上说的屏幕亮度是250cd/m²，但我们测量的是270cd/m²（平均）。当然，这不是最好的，但对于室内使用和室外（如果阳光不强的话）来说，这已经足够了。反过来，它的黑值也很一般，这意味着它的对比度最多只能测到~1.700：1。该设备的反应速度对于游戏笔记本来说有点慢，当屏幕完全变暗时，你可以看到一些明显的背光渗漏。在日常使用中，这不应该是太大的烦恼。


270 cd/m²	264 cd/m²	261 cd/m²
269 cd/m²	288 cd/m²	262 cd/m²
271 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	264 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

N156HMA-GA1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 288 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 270.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 288 cd/m²
Contrast: 1694:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
66.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.32

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) CSOT MNF601CA1-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr CMN1521, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM TL156VDXP0101, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-37%	5%	-41%	-35%	5%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	64.9	40.7 -37%	68.8 6%	38.1 -41%	42 -35%	69.1 6%	66.4 2%
sRGB Coverage	96.5	61 -37%	99.3 3%	56.8 -41%	62.7 -35%	99.2 3%	97 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.6	42.1 -37%	69.9 5%	39.3 -41%	43.4 -35%	69.9 5%	68.5 3%
Response Times		11%	55%	-29%	-24%	59%	60%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	30.4 ?(14.8, 15.6)	26.64 ?(12.52, 14.12) 12%	16 ?(7, 9) 47%	38.8 ?(18.6, 20.2) -28%	35.2 ?(18, 17.2) -16%	13 ?(6.3, 6.7) 57%	5.6 ?(3.2, 2.4) 82%
Response Time Black / White *	20.8 ?(11.7, 9.1)	18.65 ?(10.83, 7.82) 10%	7.6 ?(3, 4.6) 63%	26.8 ?(14.2, 12.6) -29%	27.2 ?(15.6, 11.6) -31%	8.4 ?(4.2, 4.2) 60%	12.8 ?(6.8, 6) 38%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-129%	-48%	-133%	-82%	-45%	-3%
Brightness middle	288	269 -7%	378 31%	261 -9%	284.3 -1%	338 17%	353.7 23%
Brightness	271	248 -8%	371 37%	258 -5%	262 -3%	329 21%	340 25%
Brightness Distribution	91	85 -7%	93 2%	92 1%	87 -4%	92 1%	89 -2%
Black Level *	0.17	0.5 -194%	0.33 -94%	0.19 -12%	0.17 -0%	0.27 -59%	0.34 -100%
Contrast	1694	538 -68%	1145 -32%	1374 -19%	1672 -1%	1252 -26%	1040 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.9	4.54 -139%	2.84 -49%	5.57 -193%	4.52 -138%	2.88 -52%	1.74 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.3	17.28 -424%	5.51 -67%	20.6 -524%	18.67 -466%	9.35 -183%	3.63 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.9	3.34 -271%	2.75 -206%	4.63 -414%	1.55 -72%	1.22 -36%	0.5 44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	3.8 -41%	4.08 -51%	3.19 -18%	4.1 -52%	5 -85%	2.1 22%
Gamma	2.32 ^95%	2.17 ^101%	2.4 ^92%	2.45 ^90%	2.3 ^96%	2.162 ^102%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	6535 ^99%	7408 ^88%	5841 ^111%	6146 ^106%	6529 ^100%	7497 ^87%	6257 ^104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-52% / -89%	4% / -22%	-68% / -98%	-47% / -64%	6% / -19%	20% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

使用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2），我们对该面板进行了测量，其性能在开箱后就非常好。没有色差，其色彩描述已经非常准确，这意味着你可以直接进行图像编辑工作（至少在较小的sRGB色彩空间内）。经过我们自己的校准（你可以在上面免费下载这个配置文件），我们能够在此基础上稍作改进，但这并不是真正必要的--特别是对于游戏而言。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.7 ms rise
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在户外，你肯定会从屏幕的哑光中受益，但如果太亮，你还是会努力看清屏幕上的内容。屏幕亮度可以做得更亮。IPS面板的视角稳定性很好--然而，从某些角度看，屏幕有时会显得太亮（尤其是从顶部和侧面看）。

性能 - TUF Gaming将Ryzen 7与RTX 4050结合起来。

我们的测试配置是该系列中最弱的型号--作为选择，华硕TUF Gaming A15可以安装较新的Ryzen 9 7940HS和一台GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑在最好的情况下。当然，在这种配置下，笔记本电脑的成本将大大增加。

测试条件

华硕为其游戏笔记本电脑使用Armoury Crate软件，其中也有不同的能量配置文件。然而，在我们的配置中，可选的Turbo模式并没有带来性能的提升，这就是为什么我们在性能模式下进行所有的测量和基准测试。此外，Advanced Optimus处于激活状态，然而，这导致在切换图形时出现轻微停顿（例如，在启动游戏时）。如果你不希望这样，你可以永久停用iGPU或使用正常的Optimus功能。

处理器 - Ryzen 7 7735HS

淘宝网AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS被用作笔记本电脑的处理器，这基本上是旧的Ryzen 7 6800HS但最大时钟提高了50MHz。Zen3+芯片有8个核心，可以同时处理16个线程。TUF Gaming A15的功率限制为80/65瓦，这使得它的多核性能相当不错，往往领先于采用Alder Lake CPU的竞争对手。然而，在单核测试中，拥有性能核心的英特尔芯片有明显的优势。不出所料，7735HS与申科XMG Core 15'sRyzen 7 6800H.总的来说，对于经济型游戏笔记本来说，该CPU是一个不错的选择。在电池供电的情况下，CPU短暂地消耗45瓦，然后回落到32瓦，这就是为什么多核性能下降了20%。更多的CPU基准测试可在这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2219 (2188.66-2273.89)

Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2063 (1956.47-2112.49)

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2326 (2309.07-2343.16)

MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1968 (1876.44-2253.14)

HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1980 (1935.64-2695.78)

Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H: Ø2176 (2136.52-2272.47)

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2656 (2614.89-2735.42)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	83.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	77.5 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	70.6 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	70 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	66.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	66.3 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	65.2 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	65.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	63.9 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=233, last 2 years)	19629 Points +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	17713 (16651.9^min - 17712.9^max) Points +29%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	15537 Points +13%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	15271 (12272^min - 15271.4^max) Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	14686 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	14410 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	13750 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	13155 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (11072 - 14131, n=11)	13062 Points -5%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=231, last 2 years)	1818 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	1771 Points +15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	1756 Points +14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1697 Points +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	1681 Points +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1629 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1552 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1288 - 1570, n=11)	1525 Points -1%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=231, last 2 years)	7460 Points +39%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	6754 Points +26%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	6009 Points +12%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	5921 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	5640 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5582 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5354 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (4339 - 5502, n=11)	5067 Points -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5066 Points -5%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=231, last 2 years)	700 Points +16%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	681 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	680 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	653 Points +8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	652 Points +8%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	627 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	605 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	603 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (502 - 613, n=11)	595 Points -1%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=236, last 2 years)	3108 Points +37%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	2735 (2614.89^min - 2735.42^max) Points +20%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	2696 (1935.64^min - 2695.78^max) Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2343 (2309.07^min - 2343.16^max) Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2274 (2188.66^min - 2273.89^max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	2272 (2136.52^min - 2272.47^max) Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	2253 (1876.44^min - 2253.14^max) Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1795 - 2355, n=13)	2164 Points -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	2112 (1956.47^min - 2112.49^max) Points -7%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=235, last 2 years)	269 Points +8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	256 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	253 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	250 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	249 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	247 Points -1%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	247 Points -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	245 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (206 - 255, n=12)	245 Points -2%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (219 - 279, n=11)	240 Seconds * -8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	234 Seconds * -5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	234 Seconds * -5%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	230 Seconds * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	223 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	223 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	216 Seconds * +3%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)	198.5 Seconds * +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	182 Seconds * +18%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=230, last 2 years)	77467 MIPS +28%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	67160 MIPS +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	64333 MIPS +6%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	60612 MIPS
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	59034 MIPS -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (48327 - 63214, n=11)	58608 MIPS -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	54380 MIPS -10%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	50905 MIPS -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	44105 MIPS -27%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=230, last 2 years)	6139 MIPS +6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	5826 MIPS +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5786 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5779 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (4779 - 5849, n=11)	5665 MIPS -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	5537 MIPS -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	5451 MIPS -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	5383 MIPS -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	5381 MIPS -7%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years)	13658 Points +46%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	12358 Points +32%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	11198 Points +20%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	10348 Points +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	10260 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	10254 Points +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9346 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (7368 - 10126, n=11)	9316 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	7962 Points -15%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years)	1813 Points +20%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	1782 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	1751 Points +16%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	1667 Points +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	1647 Points +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	1624 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1565 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1327 - 1615, n=11)	1538 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1507 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=233, last 2 years)	21.3 fps +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	20.5 fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	18.2 fps +5%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	17.4 fps 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.4 fps
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	16.6 fps -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (12.7 - 17.7, n=11)	16.2 fps -7%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	15.7 fps -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	15.5 fps -11%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	79.5 s * -57%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	57.7 s * -14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (44.3 - 63.8, n=11)	53 s * -5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50.6 s *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	49.9 s * +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	49.3 s * +3%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=227, last 2 years)	49.1 s * +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	48.9 s * +3%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	47 s * +7%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H	0.508 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (0.4822 - 0.585, n=11)	0.506 sec * -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4964 sec *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H	0.4904 sec * +1%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H	0.4865 sec * +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.4783 sec * +4%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4715 sec * +5%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=230, last 2 years)	0.4682 sec * +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4655 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2274 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

141.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	96.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	85.9 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.3 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81.4 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	75.7 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	71.1 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	68.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	67.7 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	64.7 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=226, last 2 years)	18673 KRay/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	16897 KRay/s +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	16315 KRay/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	15620 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (12718 - 17161, n=12)	15178 KRay/s -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	13947 KRay/s -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	12692 KRay/s -22%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	12542 KRay/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9486 KRay/s -42%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	105922 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	102221 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (81722 - 105483, n=12)	94941 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=226, last 2 years)	93765 Points -8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76434 Points -25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	68178 Points -33%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	65919 Points -36%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	62814 Points -39%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	41434 Points -59%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=226, last 2 years)	4343 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3525 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3421 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	3337 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3288 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3244 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (2818 - 3494, n=12)	3223 MB/s -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3212 MB/s -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	2876 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=226, last 2 years)	109706 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103991 Points
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	102409 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (90101 - 108729, n=12)	100503 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	99267 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	90468 Points -13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	87225 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	80703 Points -22%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80337 Points -23%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	13066 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12579 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (11441 - 13097, n=12)	12470 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=226, last 2 years)	12219 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9852 Points -22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8694 Points -31%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	8415 Points -33%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7388 Points -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7385 Points -41%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	58314 Points +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	55524 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (44756 - 58232, n=12)	52136 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=226, last 2 years)	47973 Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37738 Points -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	33085 Points -40%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	31844 Points -43%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	31516 Points -43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	26379 Points -52%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	110905 MB/s +67%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	110639 MB/s +67%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=226, last 2 years)	108280 MB/s +63%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (49927 - 137629, n=12)	85928 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	67816 MB/s +2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66845 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	66712 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66447 MB/s
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	60410 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=226, last 2 years)	1216 MB/s +87%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1164 MB/s +79%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	924 MB/s +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	919 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	898 MB/s +38%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	879 MB/s +35%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	808 MB/s +24%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (651 - 906, n=12)	800 MB/s +23%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	651 MB/s

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=226, last 2 years)	10110 KRay/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8980 KRay/s +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8556 KRay/s
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8448 KRay/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1459 - 9094, n=12)	7474 KRay/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7034 KRay/s -18%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	6989 KRay/s -18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	6790 KRay/s -21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5486 KRay/s -36%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	37023 MPixel/s +31%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=227, last 2 years)	36866 MPixel/s +30%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	33509 MPixel/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	30145 MPixel/s +6%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	29085 MPixel/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28318 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (19153 - 30542, n=12)	27676 MPixel/s -2%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	19764 MPixel/s -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	13686 MPixel/s -52%

系统性能

TUF Gaming A15在合成系统基准测试中表现良好，在PCMark 10测试中能够将自己置于中上层。总的来说，竞争者之间的差距不大，主观上，在性能方面，他们都给我们留下了良好的印象。除了前面提到的在GPU切换过程中的轻微停顿（这是正常的），系统在测试中始终运行平稳。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	7426 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7250 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7210 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	7210 Points 0%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	7201 Points 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6918 Points -4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6892 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6755 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	11150 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	10841 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)	10731 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10573 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10573 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	10499 Points -1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10401 Points -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10180 Points -4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	10047 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9744 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)	9725 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9554 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	9522 Points +2%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9475 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	9313 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	9313 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	9070 Points -3%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9053 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	11672 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)	11476 Points +11%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10333 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10333 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	9985 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	9593 Points -7%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9542 Points -8%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8957 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8744 Points -15%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)	1881 Points +21%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1752 Points +13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1718 Points +11%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1656 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1583 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1550 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1550 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)	1791 Points +18%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1720 Points +13%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1653 Points +9%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1595 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1523 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1517 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1517 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)	2046 Points +20%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1840 Points +8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1826 Points +7%
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1778 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1767 Points +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1709 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1709 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1771 Points +44%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)	1704 Points +38%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1570 Points +28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1383 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1282 Points +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1231 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1231 Points 0%

PCMark 10 Score		7210 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=226, last 2 years)	59534 MB/s +23%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56560 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	53661 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	51033 MB/s +5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48432 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (30324 - 52012, n=12)	48183 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	44445 MB/s -8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	42004 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	23850 MB/s -51%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65535 MB/s +31%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=226, last 2 years)	63479 MB/s +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	59205 MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	51619 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49994 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33938 - 51856, n=12)	48330 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	47514 MB/s -5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	46966 MB/s -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	24879 MB/s -50%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=226, last 2 years)	61731 MB/s +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	58758 MB/s +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	57505 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	55220 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54997 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33175 - 55284, n=12)	52586 MB/s -4%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	46901 MB/s -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	44756 MB/s -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	23543 MB/s -57%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	96.1 ns * -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	94.9 ns * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	94.7 ns * -15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (78.2 - 109.7, n=12)	88.5 ns * -8%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=223, last 2 years)	87.2 ns * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86 ns * -5%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 ns *
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	78.7 ns * +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的标准化延迟测试中（网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载），测试设备在目前的BIOS版本下显示出一些限制，因此不适合无限制的实时音频软件。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7213.9 μs *
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3384 μs *
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1554.9 μs *
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1418.9 μs *
Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1002.5 μs *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	719 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

安装的固态硬盘是美光公司的PCIe 4.0硬盘（2400）。这块M.2 2280硬盘的存储容量为512GB，第一次启动后有420GB可用。QLC-SSD的最大传输速率为4200MB/s，这也与我们基准中的速率相符。总的来说，它的性能很好，即使在较长的负载下也很稳定。更多的SSD基准测试被列在这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4315 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1821 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 373 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 406 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.8 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 379 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1082 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	88 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	74.5 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	73.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	70.8 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	70.3 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	62.4 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	47.3 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	42.3 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	38.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3702 (3637.58^min - 3701.54^max) MB/s +110%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)	3539 MB/s +101%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3429 (3399.4^min - 3429.12^max) MB/s +95%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2390 (2088.15^min - 2390.38^max) MB/s +36%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2383 (2361.29^min - 2382.94^max) MB/s +35%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2291 (2271.71^min - 2290.75^max) MB/s +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	2168 (2101.77^min - 2167.68^max) MB/s +23%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1748 - 2253, n=5)	1891 MB/s +8%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1759 (1754.48^min - 1759.3^max) MB/s 0%
seq write
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)	3829 MB/s +146%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3148 (3102.4^min - 3147.82^max) MB/s +103%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3113 (2869.67^min - 3113.43^max) MB/s +100%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2903 (2823.62^min - 2902.74^max) MB/s +87%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2894 (2651.7^min - 2893.78^max) MB/s +86%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2230 (2171.45^min - 2229.69^max) MB/s +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1607 (1584.61^min - 1607.26^max) MB/s +3%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1519 - 1671, n=5)	1585 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1554 (1534.35^min - 1553.61^max) MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6850 (5680.31^min - 6850.35^max) MB/s +76%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6719 (5699.43^min - 6719.47^max) MB/s +73%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)	6390 MB/s +64%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	4725 (4035.45^min - 4724.88^max) MB/s +22%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4556 (3742.64^min - 4556.27^max) MB/s +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3886 (3200.77^min - 3885.81^max) MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (3234 - 4294, n=5)	3728 MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3554 (3284.35^min - 3554.02^max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	2660 (2328.47^min - 2659.74^max) MB/s -32%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4927 (4921.4^min - 4927.47^max) MB/s +200%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4857 (4829.1^min - 4856.73^max) MB/s +196%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)	4818 MB/s +194%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3411 (3334.51^min - 3410.81^max) MB/s +108%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2869 (2667.88^min - 2869.19^max) MB/s +75%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2255 (2245.25^min - 2255.17^max) MB/s +38%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1610 - 1773, n=5)	1682 MB/s +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1671 (1644.73^min - 1670.81^max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1640 (1630.54^min - 1639.84^max) MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	80.9 (75.58^min - 80.91^max) MB/s +148%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	72.3 (71.34^min - 72.26^max) MB/s +122%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	69.4 (68.09^min - 69.4^max) MB/s +113%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)	67.9 MB/s +108%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	62.6 (62.25^min - 62.63^max) MB/s +92%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	61.1 (60.21^min - 61.13^max) MB/s +87%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.6 (32.27^min - 32.56^max) MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (29.9 - 32.8, n=5)	31.9 MB/s -2%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	31.8 (31.24^min - 31.76^max) MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	369 (333.31^min - 369.47^max) MB/s +185%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	267 (258.43^min - 266.75^max) MB/s +106%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +73%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	211 (210.13^min - 210.73^max) MB/s +63%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	194.3 (188.32^min - 194.33^max) MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	132.2 (127.58^min - 132.23^max) MB/s +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	129.5 (125.88^min - 129.52^max) MB/s 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	129.2 (127.83^min - 129.15^max) MB/s 0%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (106.4 - 132, n=5)	123.7 MB/s -4%
4k q32 t16 read
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)	2590 MB/s +228%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2217 (2210.73^min - 2217.07^max) MB/s +181%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1678 (1211.7^min - 1678.15^max) MB/s +113%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1323 (1320.64^min - 1322.54^max) MB/s +68%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (766 - 1705, n=5)	1017 MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1010 (971.83^min - 1010.09^max) MB/s +28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	903 (865.18^min - 903.16^max) MB/s +14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	789 (769.77^min - 789.25^max) MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	474 (463.36^min - 474.33^max) MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2314 (2299.73^min - 2313.93^max) MB/s +637%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2234 (2227.81^min - 2234.36^max) MB/s +611%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s +585%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1509 MB/s +381%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	609 (579.43^min - 608.79^max) MB/s +94%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (313 - 1585, n=5)	595 MB/s +89%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	372 (363.89^min - 371.6^max) MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	345 (331.77^min - 344.95^max) MB/s +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	314 (293.25^min - 314.3^max) MB/s 0%

AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)	6843 Points +106%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	6117 Points +85%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	5541 Points +67%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5285 Points +59%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5168 Points +56%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4020 Points +21%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2845 - 4261, n=4)	3370 Points +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3315 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	2702 Points -18%
Score Read
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)	2508 Points +125%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2291 Points +105%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2128 Points +91%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1726 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1621 Points +45%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1322 Points +18%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1031 - 1830, n=4)	1305 Points +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1116 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	760 Points -32%
Score Write
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3361 Points +94%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)	3120 Points +80%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2814 Points +62%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2660 Points +53%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2388 Points +38%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1735 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1584 Points -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1257 - 1735, n=4)	1491 Points -14%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1456 Points -16%
Seq Read
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)	4963 MB/s +43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4874 MB/s +41%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4111.85 MB/s +19%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3792 MB/s +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	3697.92 MB/s +7%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3466 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (2798 - 3691, n=4)	3189 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	3013 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	2432.02 MB/s -30%
Seq Write
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)	3673 MB/s +184%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2772 MB/s +114%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2768 MB/s +114%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2711 MB/s +109%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2232.79 MB/s +72%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	2106.21 MB/s +63%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1156 - 1633, n=4)	1329 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1295 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1229.14 MB/s -5%
4K Read
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	82.5 MB/s +171%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	75.66 MB/s +149%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	71.91 MB/s +137%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	66.9 MB/s +120%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s +120%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	63 MB/s +107%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51.2 MB/s +68%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (30 - 42.8, n=4)	35.7 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	30.4 MB/s
4K Write
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	312.09 MB/s +127%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	242.19 MB/s +76%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	225 MB/s +64%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)	211 MB/s +53%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	184.8 MB/s +34%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	169.96 MB/s +24%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	137.5 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	136 MB/s -1%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (99.8 - 137.5, n=4)	121.6 MB/s -12%
4K-64 Read
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)	1939 MB/s +162%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	1923 MB/s +160%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1675.54 MB/s +127%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1296 MB/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1070 MB/s +45%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (721 - 1430, n=4)	953 MB/s +29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	838.49 MB/s +13%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	739 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	441.63 MB/s -40%
4K-64 Write
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2967.73 MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)	2544 MB/s +73%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2407 MB/s +64%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	2198 MB/s +50%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	1865.08 MB/s +27%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1468 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (1003 - 1468, n=4)	1258 MB/s -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	1218.61 MB/s -17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	954 MB/s -35%
Access Time Read
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.039 - 0.15, n=4)	0.095 ms * -144%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	0.073 ms * -87%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.066 ms * -69%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)	0.05343 ms * -37%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.046 ms * -18%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.039 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.03 ms * +23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.03 ms * +23%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.029 ms * +26%
Access Time Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM (0.116 - 0.414, n=4)	0.1968 ms * -42%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.139 ms *
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.108 ms * +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N	0.081 ms * +42%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.074 ms * +47%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)	0.04639 ms * +67%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	0.033 ms * +76%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.029 ms * +79%
Gigabyte G5 KE Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	0.013 ms * +91%

* ... smaller is better

reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus TUF A15 FA507: Ø4012 (3504.22-4030.94)

显卡 -GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑

在日常使用中，图形计算是由集成的AMD Radeon 680M- 对于较大的工作量，它会自动切换到专用的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑.后者有6GB内存，根据驱动程序，这是140瓦的版本。然而，这一规格有点误导，因为无论如何，新的GPU在游戏时最多消耗~95瓦。因此，它是RTX 4050笔记本电脑的最快版本。这也反映在基准测试中，TUF Gaming A15的平均表现比我们数据库中该GPU的平均值快10%左右。

这意味着RTX 4050笔记本电脑也非常接近于旧的 RTX 3060，在对比设备中，它的功耗也明显更高（在115瓦和140瓦TGP之间）。总的来说，它的性能非常好，即使在永久性负载下也没有性能下降--Time Spy 压力测试的运行没有任何问题，通过率为99.3%。在电池模式下，GPU的功耗被限制在50瓦左右，这就是为什么图形性能下降了约30%。更多GPU基准测试列在我们的技术部分。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	100 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM ^-4! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	79.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK ^-3! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	75.6 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	74.8 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE ^-3! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	74.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	70.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 ^-3! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	49.7 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr ^-2! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	45 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)	40513 Points +28%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	31690 Points
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	30959 Points -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	30772 Points -3%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	29569 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	29568 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=36)	28539 Points -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	20869 Points -34%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	19416 Points -39%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=237, last 2 years)	29469 Points +29%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	23443 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	22915 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	22899 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	22625 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	22406 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13591 - 24007, n=34)	21045 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	15611 Points -32%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	14628 Points -36%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=235, last 2 years)	12072 Points +39%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9174 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	8764 Points +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	8692 Points
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	8686 Points 0%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	8500 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5107 - 9040, n=34)	7763 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	5946 Points -32%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	5481 Points -37%

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 226512, n=234, last 2 years)	121576 Points +39%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	105772 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	102470 Points +17%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	102369 Points +17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	87670 Points 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	87554 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (63538 - 90075, n=33)	82182 Points -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	71459 Points -18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	68271 Points -22%

Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=44, last 2 years)	116331 Points +43%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	81622 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (66574 - 84452, n=12)	76353 Points -6%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=188, last 2 years)	602 mpaths +20%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	501 mpaths
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	480 mpaths -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (333 - 529, n=30)	466 mpaths -7%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	396 mpaths -21%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	395 mpaths -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	216 mpaths -57%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=128, last 2 years)	2037 mpaths +39%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1465 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1021 - 1588, n=20)	1419 mpaths -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1227 mpaths -16%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	679 mpaths -54%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=131, last 2 years)	1467 mpaths +36%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1075 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (735 - 1123, n=20)	1022 mpaths -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	917 mpaths -15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	552 mpaths -49%

3DMark 11 Performance		26692 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		20183 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		8902 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	393 Seconds * -14%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	345 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	345 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (345 - 345, n=2)	345 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming (51 - 668, n=15, last 2 years)	275 Seconds * +20%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	48 Seconds * -78%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	48 Seconds * -78%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	30 Seconds * -11%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	30 Seconds * -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=35)	29 Seconds * -7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	27 Seconds * -0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	27 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=181, last 2 years)	23.1 Seconds * +14%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	83 Seconds * -66%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	83 Seconds * -66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=35)	56.7 Seconds * -13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	53 Seconds * -6%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	53 Seconds * -6%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	52 Seconds * -4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	50 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=188, last 2 years)	39.7 Seconds * +21%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H	441 Seconds * -17%
Gigabyte G5 KE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	423 Seconds * -13%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	416 Seconds * -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=35)	400 Seconds * -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H	385 Seconds * -2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds *
Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	361 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=200, last 2 years)	315 Seconds * +16%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

我们的TUF Gaming A15的基本变体的游戏性能非常好--即使在以最大细节设置玩《霍格沃茨传奇》或《赛博朋克2077》等现代游戏时，对原生1080p分辨率来说也是绰绰有余。然而，如果你想使用光线追踪，你必须使用DLSS升频。例如，《赛博朋克2077》在1080p下使用光线追踪在Ultra下只能运行24FPS，而使用DLSS则可以运行74FPS。然而，在其他游戏中的差异可能更小。基本上，所有现代游戏都能运行，6GB的VRAM目前完全可以满足1080p的要求。该 Witcher 3测试还表明，即使在较长的时间内，游戏性能也保持稳定。

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	98.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	88.1 pt
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	83.2 pt
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	76.9 pt
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	73.8 pt
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	63.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	61.4 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.5 (87^min) fps +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	87.6 (77^min, 77.42^P1) fps +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83 fps +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81.5 (69^min, 78^P1) fps -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	58.5 (49^min) fps -29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.7 (51^min) fps -33%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=219, last 2 years)	107.6 fps +29%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	103 (7.98^min, 71.4^P1) fps +23%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	97.9 (4.48^min, 62.5^P1) fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	97.3 (8.65^min, 62.5^P1) fps +17%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	92.2 (4.55^min, 55.6^P1) fps +10%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.5 (2.82^min, 58.8^P1) fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	73.5 (23.5^min, 47.6^P1) fps -12%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	73.1 (6.87^min, 47.6^P1) fps -12%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=229, last 2 years)	111.5 fps +37%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.9 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.9 fps +13%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	90.3 fps +11%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.8 fps +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.5 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	58.8 fps -28%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.7 fps -33%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=227, last 2 years)	207 fps +41%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	160 (75.9^min, 121^P1) fps +9%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	153.3 (32.3^min, 117.2^P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	152.7 (65.8^min, 117.2^P1) fps +4%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	148.7 (20.2^min, 114.3^P1) fps +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	147 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	101.3 (71.9^min, 78.3^P1) fps -31%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	97.4 (34.3^min, 73.6^P1) fps -34%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	148 (129.6^min) fps +28%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=239, last 2 years)	143 fps +23%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	142.5 (121.3^min) fps +23%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	137.5 (121.2^min) fps +19%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	123.8 (108.4^min) fps +7%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	115.8 (102.7^min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	112.3 (97.8^min) fps -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	107.8 (97.3^min) fps -7%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	107 fps +38%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=244, last 2 years)	102.2 fps +31%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97 fps +25%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92.9 fps +19%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.7 fps +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	81.1 fps +4%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	77.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	74.2 fps -5%

The Witcher 3 | F1 22 | Far Cry 5 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | Hogwarts Legacy

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91.5 (87^min) fps +11%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	87.6 (77^min, 77.42^P1) fps +7%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83 fps +1%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	82.2 (79^min, 80^P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	81.5 (69^min, 78^P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.5 - 94.7, n=38)	75.2 fps -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	58.5 (49^min) fps -29%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	54.7 (51^min) fps -33%

F1 22
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (17.1 - 322, n=101, last 2 years)	196.4 fps +22%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	161.2 (124^min, 72^P1) fps
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	153.3 (137^min, 102^P1) fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (94.4 - 174.7, n=19)	143.7 fps -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	92 (76^min) fps -43%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (13 - 144.7, n=109, last 2 years)	80.1 fps +42%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56.4 (44^min, 42^P1) fps
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	55.9 (48^min, 46^P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10.9 - 56.4, n=21)	47.1 fps -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	32 (26^min) fps -43%

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (14 - 218, n=126, last 2 years)	126.3 fps +28%
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	119 fps +20%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	118 (90^min) fps +19%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	114 (86^min) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	107 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (50 - 127, n=21)	101.5 fps +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	99 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming (11.3 - 205, n=90, last 2 years)	93.6 fps +32%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72.5 (12.2^min) fps +2%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (48 - 91.3, n=14)	67.8 fps -5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	46.9 (5.1^min) fps -34%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=102, last 2 years)	86.7 fps +31%
Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	68 (30.6^min) fps +3%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (44.4 - 79.4, n=14)	62.1 fps -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	36.8 (5.1^min) fps -44%

Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (12.8 - 186.5, n=24, last 2 years)	89.4 fps 0%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	89 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (44.8 - 93.6, n=8)	66.3 fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 166.1, n=25, last 2 years)	74.7 fps +52%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (39 - 77.3, n=8)	53.3 fps +9%
Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49 fps

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø82.2 (79-84)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)		168.6	153.1	83.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)			171	82.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	137.4	127.2		115.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	178.9	115.5	81.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	103.5	97	77.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)		111	105	99
Strange Brigade (2018)		211	171	147
F1 2021 (2021)	283	260	209	110.3
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	103	82	71	66
F1 22 (2022)	192.7	191.4	161.2	56.4
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	122	109	89	49

排放--带有酷炫键盘的游戏笔记本

噪声排放

对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说，我们的测试设备是比较安静的。在简单的任务中，散热器经常是完全无声的，甚至在负载下，我们也感到非常惊讶：在压力测试中，风扇的最大噪音水平为43 dB(A)。在游戏时，我们测得的噪音在40-43 dB(A)之间，这意味着TUF Gaming A15仍然比其竞争对手更安静。我们假设更强的配置会有稍大的风扇。我们没有注意到任何其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A)
Load		29.6 / 43 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	Gigabyte G5 KE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 6800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Noise		-33%	-13%	-10%	-10%	-25%	-14%
off / environment *	23.3	19.52 16%	23 1%	24 -3%	24.8 -6%	25 -7%	23.2 -0%
Idle Minimum *	23.3	31.05 -33%	23 1%	24 -3%	26.2 -12%	29 -24%	23.6 -1%
Idle Average *	23.3	31.05 -33%	23 1%	24 -3%	29.2 -25%	30 -29%	23.6 -1%
Idle Maximum *	23.3	31.05 -33%	23 1%	24 -3%	29.4 -26%	32 -37%	25.4 -9%
Load Average *	29.6	55.66 -88%	42.41 -43%	37.71 -27%	29.9 -1%	42 -42%	38 -28%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43	55.7 -30%	54.71 -27%	45.75 -6%	41.1 4%	46 -7%	54.1 -26%
Load Maximum *	43	55.51 -29%	55.05 -28%	54.55 -27%	45.5 -6%	54 -26%	57.2 -33%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常工作中没有温度问题，即使在负载下，华硕笔记本电脑的表面温度也得到了很好的控制。基本单元的上部中心区域变得非常热，几乎达到50℃，但这个热点在键盘上方，特别是WASD键区域保持非常凉爽，这在游戏时很重要。在底部，我们测量了后部区域的最高温度为44℃，你甚至可以将笔记本放在大腿上而没有任何问题。

正如预期的那样，在压力测试中，dGPU受到了青睐。在最初的15分钟内仍有轻微的波动，然后处理器和显卡分别稳定在35瓦和80瓦的水平。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


44.8 °C	48.9 °C	43 °C
35.8 °C	42.6 °C	39.2 °C
27.1 °C	30.6 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 48.9 °C
Average: 37.4 °C


44.6 °C	41.8 °C	43.5 °C
34.2 °C	31.3 °C	35 °C
23.1 °C	25.1 °C	24 °C

Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 33.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


27.1 °C	27.1 °C	26.3 °C
26.9 °C	26.7 °C	26.5 °C
24.5 °C	25.9 °C	24.8 °C

Maximum: 27.1 °C
Average: 26.2 °C


27.2 °C	27.4 °C	27.5 °C
26.5 °C	27.3 °C	27.4 °C
23.8 °C	25 °C	25.6 °C

Maximum: 27.5 °C
Average: 26.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 23.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41.1 °C	48.3 °C	43.7 °C
35.7 °C	42 °C	39.6 °C
27.1 °C	29.3 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 48.3 °C
Average: 36.9 °C


43 °C	39.1 °C	42.2 °C
36.1 °C	30.9 °C	34.4 °C
23.6 °C	25.8 °C	24.2 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 33.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte G5 KE Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Heat		-25%	-9%	-18%	20%	2%	-21%
Maximum Upper Side *	48.9	52.6 -8%	48 2%	47 4%	37.2 24%	47 4%	44.4 9%
Maximum Bottom *	44.6	62.4 -40%	51 -14%	48 -8%	35.4 21%	52 -17%	48.8 -9%
Idle Upper Side *	27.1	33.6 -24%	28 -3%	35 -29%	22.4 17%	25 8%	37.8 -39%
Idle Bottom *	27.5	34.8 -27%	33 -20%	38 -38%	22.6 18%	24 13%	39.6 -44%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

TUF Gaming A15当然不能夸耀惊人的声音，两个立体声扬声器相当平均--但这往往是廉价游戏笔记本电脑的情况。音乐和电影的收听和观看其实并不有趣--反正我们建议在游戏时使用耳机，因为否则风扇会很烦人。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF A15 FA507 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.28 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--由于有大电池，运行时间长

消耗功率

在我们的消耗测量中，评测样本仍然非常节俭，即使在游戏时，A15仍然比RTX-3060笔记本电脑高效得多，后者也没有提供更多的功率。我们在压力测试中确定的最大功率为185瓦，然后迅速稳定在155瓦左右。鉴于这些比率，所包含的240瓦的电源对于基本变体来说几乎是超大的，而目前更紧凑的200瓦模块的Zenbook Pro 14将完全足够。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.28 / 0.6 Watt
Idle	8 / 12.1 / 12.5 Watt
Load	74.9 / 185 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-19%	-31%	2%	-11%	-7%	-30%	-22%	-67%
Idle Minimum *	8	7.66 4%	11.8 -48%	8.5 -6%	5.1 36%	8 -0%	6.3 21%	10.1 ?(2 - 21.1, n=27) -26%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -73%
Idle Average *	12.1	10.3 15%	14.7 -21%	10.2 16%	15.1 -25%	10 17%	9.8 19%	15.1 ?(5 - 32, n=27) -25%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -59%
Idle Maximum *	12.5	16.05 -28%	15 -20%	11.3 10%	18.9 -51%	16 -28%	26.5 -112%	18.3 ?(7.9 - 30.4, n=27) -46%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) -116%
Load Average *	74.9	115.8 -55%	100 -34%	84 -12%	114.5 -53%	99 -32%	103.8 -39%	87.7 ?(52.4 - 151, n=27) -17%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) -49%
Witcher 3 ultra *	136.6	168.7 -23%	184 -35%	128 6%	113.9 17%	144.6 -6%	189 -38%
Load Maximum *	185	234.6 -27%	237 -28%	189 -2%	165.8 10%	168 9%	241.9 -31%	182 ?(104.2 - 280, n=27) 2%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -36%

* ... smaller is better

power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø136.6 (130.6-143)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø156.7 (141.4-185.8)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.48 (5.34-11.4)

power consumption with external monitor

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø8.13 (5.12-10.8)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø104.5 (84.7-111.6)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø34.5 (32.8-59.9)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93.8 (91-95.8)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø131.7 (128.4-146.1)

Asus TUF A15 FA507; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø135.2 (129.6-143.3)

运行时间

这台笔记本电脑的90Wh电池导致了非常好的电池运行时间。除了几分钟之外，在我们的测试中，无论显示器是在60赫兹还是144赫兹模式下，都没有什么区别。在150cd/m²的WLAN测试中（相当于最大亮度的73%），我们注意到刚刚超过11.5小时，在全亮度下仍然超过9.5小时。在150cd/m²的视频测试中，我们测得超过12.5小时。当设备被打开时，一个完整的充电过程需要106分钟。充电曲线在70%时才趋于平缓，这是在~44分钟后的情况。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 114)		11h 41min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 114)		9h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 27min
Load (maximum brightness)		0h 59min

	Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) R7 6800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh	MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 60 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-43%	-13%	-26%	-36%	-50%	-24%	-17%
H.264	747	130 -83%		264 -65%				400 ?(56 - 747, n=94, last 2 years) -46%
WiFi v1.3	701	342 -51%	465 -34%	260 -63%	127 -82%	352 -50%	285 -59%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=183, last 2 years) -48%
Load	59	62 5%	64 8%	89 51%	65 10%		66 12%	84.7 ?(36 - 173, n=145, last 2 years) 44%
Witcher 3 ultra		79						80.6 ?(47 - 155, n=23, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle					155		947	546 ?(57 - 1290, n=85, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 在1080p下有很好的游戏性能

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 2个SO-DIMM和USB 4

+ 哑光144-Hz IPS显示屏，色彩还原准确

+ 超长的运行时间

+ 有效的冷却

Cons

- 平庸的网络摄像头

- 扬声器较弱

- 基本版没有操作系统

结论 - 一个适合1080p游戏的良好游戏笔记本电脑

随着TUF Gaming A15的发布，Asos将注意力集中在本质上：游戏性能。我们的基本版本，可以有大约1169美元，已经提供了足够的力量，以1080p的原生分辨率和最大的细节，顺利地玩目前的游戏 - 由于其新的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑.如果你利用升频，那么你甚至可以设法运行光线追踪。它的Zen3+处理器是一个老朋友，但即使如此，它仍然能够提供坚实的性能。内存和固态硬盘可以扩展--虽然，16GB和512GB应该可以开始使用。

笔记本电脑的外壳质量很好；它没有任何形式的花哨照明（这不一定是件坏事）。键盘上的标签对比度有点低，你经常要依靠背光才能清楚地看到它们。但是，当你在游戏时，键盘能够保持良好的温度，而且风扇不会太响。

新的华硕TUF游戏A15的基础版本是一个很好的游戏笔记本电脑，其RTX 4050笔记本电脑为1080p显示屏提供足够的性能。

该屏幕做了它应该做的事。它的16:9哑光IPS面板的刷新率为144赫兹，色彩准确度良好，但其反应时间和亮度可以做得更好一些。我们测量了后者的亮度为300cd/m²。它的连接选项甚至包括USB 4.0，你可以连接一个G-Sync显示器。唯一的问题是，几乎所有笔记本电脑的端口都在设备的左前方和中间。

这台笔记本电脑并没有真正标出任何适当的弱点，但你必须记住，基本版本没有安装操作系统。在许多方面，该设备提供标准功能（WLAN、扬声器、网络摄像头）--但在所有核心领域，其性能令人满意。它大约1169美元的价格也相当有竞争力。

价格和可用性

我们测试的设备在亚马逊上可以找到，价格约为1169美元。

Asus TUF A15 FA507 - 2023-06-13 06/13/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

79 / 98 → 80%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

85%

Connectivity

58 / 80 → 73%

Weight

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Battery

89 / 95 → 93%

Display

87%

Games Performance

97%

Application Performance

93%

Temperature

88 / 95 → 92%

Noise

94 / 90 → 100%

Audio

78%

Camera

33 / 85 → 39%

Average

79%

86%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 213 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕TUF游戏A15笔记本评测--拥有RTX4050和144Hz屏幕的预算玩家

Andreas Osthoff, 2023-06-15 (Update: 2023-06-15)