Notebookcheck Logo
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测--经济实惠的智能手机，注重安全和高端质感

花很少的钱，更新很长时间。

如果您想在 2025 年购买一款经济实惠的中端手机，那么您很难回避Galaxy A36。至少，它注重长期更新支持。不过，双 eSIM 卡和防水外壳也是这个价位手机的独特卖点。三星是否已打造出 400 美元以下的最佳智能手机？
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Galaxy A Smartphone Android

三星Galaxy A36 5G 的评价

Galaxy A36 是经济实惠的中端市场中的一款高品质智能手机，具有 IP67 认证和大猩猩 Victus+ 玻璃。Galaxy A36 特别注重安全性。三星强调了各种保护用户的软件措施，以及硬件支持的 Knox Vault 安全架构。购买者还可以期待六年的安全更新，包括季度补丁供应。
。

尽管Galaxy A36 还存在一些小缺点，如指纹传感器速度慢、有些不准确或显示屏边框过宽，但它给我们留下了积极的总体印象。它的性价比很高，现在的价格远低于 400 美元。如果您考虑到三星手机的骁龙 6 代 3，而不愿购买这款手机，那么您可以考虑将 Nothing Phone (3a) 或 Poco X7 Pro 作为可行的替代品。

就性能而言，尤其是在长期使用的情况下，高通芯片组还存在一些问题。与Galaxy A35 相比，它的性能提升几乎不明显，总的来说，2025 型号的性能并不能给人带来信心。

Pros

+ 更新时间长
+ 快速 OLED 面板
+ 防水外壳
+ 双 eSIM 卡

Cons

- 仅 USB 2.0
- SoC 稍慢
- 仅有 WiFi 6（无 6 GHz）
- 少数蓝牙音频编解码器

价格和供应情况

截至发稿时，三星Galaxy A36 5G 可在亚马逊订购，售价为 384.99 美元。

最受欢迎的中端 智能手机系列的新一代产品。除了顶级的 Galaxy A56 5G之外，它的小弟弟 A56 5G 也将以良好的性价比给人留下深刻印象，同时在安全和数据保护方面也不会妥协。三星特别强调了其名为 "Awesome Intelligence "的全新人工智能功能，以及中端手机超长的更新周期。三星今年采用了高通公司的芯片组，为中端手机配备了 骁龙 6 代 3.

三星Galaxy A36 5G 的规格

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Galaxy A30 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 710
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.70 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 385 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, Super AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 233.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.4 x 162.9 x 78.2
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, Videos @2160p/​30fps) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, wide) + 5 MPix (f/2.4, macro), Camera2API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, FF, Videos @1080p/​30fps)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, info material, One UI 7.0, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.525W/​kg Head, 1.293W/​kg Body, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), Galileo (E1), SBAS, HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, BT-Codec: SBC, AAC, SSC, LDAC, aptX HD, fanless, waterproof
Weight
195 g
Price
379 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

表壳 -Galaxy A36 5G 采用玻璃后壳

三星Galaxy A36 5G 有多种颜色可供选择（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
三星Galaxy A36 5G 有多种颜色可供选择（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

Galaxy A36 配备了 6.7 英寸显示屏，比上一代产品大了 0.1 英寸。此外，屏幕周围的边框也窄了近一毫米，显示屏与屏幕的比例提高到了 86.5%。与同价位的其他智能手机相比 价位相比，Super AMOLED 面板周围的边框还是有点宽。三星手机现在的重量为 195 克，比 A35 减少了 14 克。

为了保护显示屏，三星使用了大猩猩玻璃 Victus+，不仅防刮花，理论上还能承受从两米高处跌落。背面则采用康宁大猩猩 7 号玻璃，即大猩猩 Victus 玻璃。该价位手机的一大亮点是通过了 IP67 认证，可保护手机外壳免受灰尘和水的侵袭。Galaxy A36 的制造质量堪称典范，所有缝隙都很均匀。不过，Galaxy A36 的边框仅由塑料制成，这影响了它的手感和高档外观。 Galaxy A56.尽管如此，这款三星手机丝毫没有廉价感。

我们的测试设备炫白版三星Galaxy A36 5G
我们的测试设备炫白版三星Galaxy A36 5G
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

尺寸比较

❌
163.52 mm 77.5 mm 8.35 mm 201 g162.33 mm 74.42 mm 8.55 mm 190 g162.33 mm 74.42 mm 8.4 mm 185.5 g162.9 mm 78.2 mm 7.4 mm 195 g161.7 mm 78 mm 8.2 mm 209 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 三星手机只有 USB 2.0 接口

Galaxy A36 配备 6 或 8 GB 内存，以及 128 或 256 GB 内部存储空间。三星手机的通用闪存（UFS）不再可以通过 microSD 卡扩展。不过，手机支持 OTG，可以连接 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT 格式的外部存储介质。也可以使用 NTFS，但在这种情况下只允许读取数据。

除此之外，这款中档智能手机虽然仍只使用 USB 2.0，但提供了良好的连接性。在拷贝测试中，其 29 MB/s 的传输速度并不算高。

Galaxy A36 采用了硬件支持的 Knox Vault，它将专用处理器与存储单元相结合，以确保密码等个人数据的安全。据三星称，该手机还采用了一系列广泛的安全措施，如防盗保护。

箱体左侧
箱体左侧
机壳右侧（按钮：音量、开关）
机壳右侧（按钮：音量、开关）
顶盖侧面（麦克风）
顶盖侧面（麦克风）
机箱右侧（扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、麦克风、卡槽）
机箱右侧（扬声器、麦克风、USB 端口、麦克风、卡槽）

软件 - 支持长期更新的中端手机

Galaxy A36 的更新供应包括操作系统的六次主要更新和六年的安全更新（包括季度补丁），这对于一款中档手机来说是非常好的。在这个价位的智能手机中，几乎没有哪款手机能提供这样的更新包。 摩托 G75或 Nothing Phone (3a)最接近三星堪称典范的软件支持。Galaxy A36 还再次推出了企业版--这里甚至有七年的安全更新和 One UI 更新。

在我们的测试中，Galaxy A36 配备了Android 15，包括 2025 年 4 月起的安全补丁和内部用户界面 One UI 7。新加入的 "Awesome Intelligence "作为移动人工智能，拥有丰富的人工智能功能和搜索圈。的小弟弟。 Galaxy AIGalaxy S 机型中的人工智能小弟，可处理文本、图像和视频，并提供熟悉的照片编辑功能，如对象橡皮擦。

三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测

可持续性

Galaxy A36 采用无塑料包装。三星没有提供使用回收材料的确切细节，但提供了大量有关二氧化碳排放量的数据。欧洲的排放量分别为 35 和 41千克二氧化碳当量。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy A36 5G 配备 WiFi 6

Galaxy A36 采用 IEEE 802.11-ax，仅使用两个频段的 WiFi 6。不过，使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 时，其传输速率相当快且稳定。安装的调制解调器支持 LTE 和 5G 的各种频率，使这款三星手机成为有趣的旅行伴侣。即便如此，三星 Galaxy S25支持的频段要多得多。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
860 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
752 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
830 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
400 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
375 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼45%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
398 (min: 193) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
377 (min: 187) MBit/s ∼45%
Nothing Phone (3a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
938 (min: 466) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
831 (min: 777) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
859 (min: 305) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
831 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
730 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
720 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼87%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (440-918)
Nothing Phone (3a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (466-956)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (713-779)
Nothing Phone (3a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø830 (777-861)
室内定位服务
室内定位服务
户外定位服务
户外定位服务

在户外，Galaxy A36 可以快速找到卫星信号，并以 3 米的精度定位。全球所有主要卫星网络都可用于定位，但仅限于单频模式。

在我们的实际测试中，我们带着参考智能手表（Garmin Venu 2）进行了一次短途徒步旅行，在这次旅行中，三星手机表现出色。不过，在拐弯处行走时，地图并不总是很准确，与实际路线也有一些小偏差。不过，总的来说，它的表现还是不错的，完全可以胜任导航任务。

定位服务： Galaxy A36 5G 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比
定位服务： Galaxy A36 5G 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持 eSIM 的三星智能手机

三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测

在日常使用中，三星手机的语音传输听起来很自然，背景噪音也基本被过滤掉了。Galaxy A36 支持 Wi-Fi 通话或 VoLTE 等常用功能以及双卡双待操作。后者甚至可以完全通过 eSIM 卡实现。

相机 - 配备索尼传感器的Galaxy A36 5G？

Galaxy A36 上的自拍照
Galaxy A36 上的自拍照

Galaxy A36 的前置摄像头分辨率为 1200 万像素，配备固定焦距。该镜头可创建 10 位 HDR 图像，并具有 4K30 选项。其照片画质不错，肤色看起来相当自然。

配备光学防抖功能的 5000 万像素主摄像头可能是基于索尼 LYT-600 或 IMX882，三星尚未提供有关 1/1.95 英寸传感器的确切细节。虽然该镜头显示出良好的动态范围，但即使在日光下，一些细节也会被吞噬。另一方面，在弱光环境下，拍摄的照片看起来噪点越来越多，对焦也越来越柔和，但照片的亮度还是不错的。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
4x
4x
10倍（最大值）
10倍（最大值）
宏观
宏观

相机系统共有三个镜头。主摄像头由一个分辨率为 800 万像素的超广角镜头和一个 500 万像素的微距摄像头组成。缩放完全采用数字方式，因此放大倍率超过 2 倍时质量很差。另一方面，超广角镜头的质量在同价位产品中还算不错--即使是照片看起来也不是特别清晰，而且在较暗的地方很快就会出现噪点。

超高清视频录制速度最高可达 30fps，1080p 录制速度最高可达 60fps。使用 50 MPix 镜头的图像防抖效果总体不错。喜欢使用第三方应用程序拍摄视频的用户应注意，Galaxy A36 的 Camera2 API 支持水平有限。这意味着只能有限地访问相机功能。

三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low lightUltra-wide angle5x zoom

在受控照明条件下，我们将主相机的色彩还原与实际参考色彩进行了对比分析。Galaxy A36 显示出一些亮度，但没有大的偏差。在 ColorChecker 通行证中，我们只观察到一个色彩保真度离群值（>15），除此之外，三星手机生成的色彩图像是一致的。

ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A36 5G: 6.99 ∆E min: 1.32 - max: 16.36 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
52.2 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
53.2 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
57.4 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A36 5G: 38.11 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 57.43 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不带电源的三星手机

Galaxy A36 5G 的卡槽
Galaxy A36 5G 的卡槽

Galaxy A36 只配备了 USB-C 数据线和 SIM 卡工具。没有预装保护膜。配套的三星电源适配器或其他配件可从三星在线商店选购。

该手机享有 12 个月的标准保修，可通过制造商的 Care+ 保险套餐延长保修期。根据服务期限和保险范围的不同，费用在 40 美元到 120 美元之间。

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy A36 5G 配备 FaceUnlock 功能

Galaxy A36 的触摸屏反应灵敏，以 120 Hz 的高刷新率确保操作流畅。另一方面，在日常使用中，三星手机总是显得有些力不从心，出现轻微的卡顿。只要在后台进行更新应用程序等操作，其性能就会明显下降。

虽然集成在手机 OLED 显示屏上的光学传感器可以识别指纹，但其可靠性并不是最好的，而且Galaxy A36 的解锁时间比 S 系列的解锁时间要长得多。 S 系列的超声波解锁。另外，Galaxy A36 还可选择通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，一般来说效果不错。不过，这种方法也有一些局限性：不仅安全性不如指纹传感器，而且在光线不足的条件下也不可靠。

安装的线性振动电机提供了很好的触觉反馈，而且可以在设备设置中进行完全自定义，让用户调整振动强度。

三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测
三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测

显示屏 - 三星手机采用 AMOLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

Galaxy A36 配备了一块 6.7 英寸的 Super AMOLED 屏幕。它的刷新率由系统直接自动调节，频率为 60 或 120 Hz。与前代产品相比，该屏幕增大了 0.1 英寸。 英寸在分辨率相同的情况下，像素密度略低。

在我们的测试中，Galaxy 手机在激活环境光传感器的情况下显示全白时，亮度超过 1,100 cd/m²。与典型的有机发光二极管一样，当显示明暗区域分布（APL18）时，亮度会更高--此时亮度最高可达 1,877 cd/m²。在播放 HDR 视频时，我们甚至看到了 2,012 cd/m²，确保了非常好的 HDR 效果和更宽的对比度范围。

1129
cd/m²		1126
cd/m²		1142
cd/m²
1133
cd/m²		1127
cd/m²		1149
cd/m²
1141
cd/m²		1136
cd/m²		1149
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1149 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1136.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1127 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Xiaomi Poco X7
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Nothing Phone (3a)
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Screen
-11%
12%
9%
-42%
Brightness middle
1127
904
-20%
1138
1%
1156
3%
1287
14%
Brightness
1137
912
-20%
1137
0%
1150
1%
1274
12%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
97
-1%
98
0%
97
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
2.1
-17%
1.1
39%
1.1
39%
1.9
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
2.8
-0%
2.6
7%
3.1
-11%
8.7
-211%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
2.2
-5%
1.6
24%
1.6
24%
3.4
-62%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.1 105%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.26 97%
CCT
6466 101%
6478 100%
6284 103%
6304 103%
7072 92%

* ... smaller is better

丰富的黑色和高动态效果的缺点是 OLED 闪烁，这可能会导致敏感人群眼睛灼痛或头痛。在最低亮度下，Galaxy A36 的刷新率也不是特别高，仅为 120 Hz 至 240 Hz。虽然其平坦均匀的振幅曲线可以稍稍缓解这一问题，但我们还是希望能在这里看到高频 PWM 调光。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 13.04 %
Secondary Frequency: 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8439 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们使用照片光谱仪和卡尔曼软件进行分析后发现，这款中端手机在 sRGB 色彩空间中实现了较低的平均 Delta-E 偏差，使用 "自然 "配置文件时色温也非常准确。遗憾的是，三星 One UI 只提供了两种色彩配置文件，其中最准确的色彩和灰度显示不允许对色温进行任何调整。三星急需在这方面为用户提供更多的设置选项。

色彩准确度（配置文件：自然；目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：自然；目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然；目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然；目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：自然；目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：自然；目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：自然；目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：自然；目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8225 ms rise
↘ 0.748 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.599 ms rise
↘ 0.59 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

Galaxy A36 在户外使用时没有任何问题；即使在阳光直射下，内容也始终清晰可辨。即便如此，如果不使用环境光传感器，亮度（419 cd/m²）也会降低。

OLED 面板的视角非常稳定，我们只注意到平视时亮度会有适度下降。在极端视角下，面板上只有轻微的蓝雾。

性能 - 搭载高通 SoC 的三星手机

骁龙 6 代 3 骁龙 6 代 3Galaxy A36 内有两个 Cortex-A78 内核和四个基于 Cortex-A55 的省电内核。因此，除了时钟频率略有提高外，该芯片组与 骁龙 6 第一代的入门级 SoC 相同。不出所料，在我们的测试中，Galaxy A36 无法赶上更强大的中端智能手机，如 Poco X7 Pro.无 Nothing Phone (3a)配备了 骁龙 7s 第 3 代在 Geekbench 测试中领先三星手机约 10%至 15%。我们还测出它的性能几乎没有比前代产品提升。事实上 Exynos 1380的 Galaxy A35在基准测试中的表现往往略胜一筹。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=205, last 2 years)
1544 Points +49%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1171 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1043 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1033 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1030 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (1011 - 1033, n=2)
1022 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=205, last 2 years)
4401 Points +49%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3250 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
2955 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (2887 - 2955, n=2)
2921 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2908 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2891 Points -2%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=138, last 2 years)
1303791 Points +111%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
795329 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
665983 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
631545 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (617456 - 620511, n=2)
618984 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
617456 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
15606 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
13982 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
13421 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
13406 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (12811 - 13807, n=2)
13309 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
12811 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=157, last 2 years)
990 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
877 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (737 - 877, n=2)
807 Points -8%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
785 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
759 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
709 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points -26%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=154, last 2 years)
6801 Points +50%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5543 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4983 Points +10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4725 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (4532 - 4545, n=2)
4539 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
4532 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points -3%
System
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
10784 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=154, last 2 years)
10640 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8774 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (8445 - 9006, n=2)
8726 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8672 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8445 Points
Memory
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
7675 Points +66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=154, last 2 years)
7516 Points +62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4768 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4732 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
4632 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (4554 - 4632, n=2)
4593 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points -7%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
19418 Points +142%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8951 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8632 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8570 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8011 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (7298 - 8011, n=2)
7655 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points -12%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=154, last 2 years)
1612 Points +11%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1585 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1452 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (1425 - 1452, n=2)
1439 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1401 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1387 Points -4%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)
18171 Points +120%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (8253 - 9416, n=2)
8835 Points +7%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8626 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8359 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
8253 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8087 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points -27%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
27735 Points +4625%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
719 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (587 - 729, n=2)
658 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
587 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=41, last 2 years)
1677 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
1441 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (512 - 1441, n=2)
977 Points -32%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
542 Points -62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
406 Points -72%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
397 Points -72%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=41, last 2 years)
998 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
844 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (212 - 844, n=2)
528 Points -37%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
233 Points -72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
138 Points -84%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
136 Points -84%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
851 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (211 - 851, n=2)
531 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=42, last 2 years)
442 Points -48%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
233 Points -73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
141 Points -83%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
137 Points -84%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=44, last 2 years)
4248 Points +1321%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1388 Points +364%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144
299 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
  (n=1)
299 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
234 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
232 Points -22%

手机集成的 Adreno 710图形处理器时，Galaxy A36 与 Nothing Phone (3a)在我们的测试中，与 CPU 的差距一样大。事实证明，高通公司的 GPU 与 Mali-G68 MP5 的性能相比也没有明显提升。 Mali-G68 MP5.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1063 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
901 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
883 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
842 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points -12%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1057 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
907 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
871 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
846 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points -11%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4186 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3502 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3167 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3129 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2796 Points -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps -20%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps -20%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
126 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
117 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps -9%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -8%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
83 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -20%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -24%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -7%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -8%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -12%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +13%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +13%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -26%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -19%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -26%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -28%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -23%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.1 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -18%

在三星手机上浏览网页是一种真正的享受，因为网站加载速度相当快，显示也没有任何重大延迟。不过，它的基准测试结果并不是特别高。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
161.602 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years)
137.7 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
131.654 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (126.4 - 131.7, n=2)
129 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
87.225 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
85.453 Points -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
176 runs/min +68%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
169 runs/min +61%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
107 runs/min +2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
105 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (105 - 105, n=2)
105 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
77.4 runs/min -26%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=96, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min +82%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
11.2 runs/min +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (6.94 - 6.97, n=2)
6.96 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
6.94 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
6.88 runs/min -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
6.56 runs/min -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min -16%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
149 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (127 - 140, n=2)
133.5 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=157, last 2 years)
128.2 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
127 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
100 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
96 Points -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
45346 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)
43074 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
38099 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (37483 - 38099, n=2)
37791 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
31245 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
28945 Points -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)
1364 ms * -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)
1351.21 ms * -31%
Xiaomi Poco X7
1312.2 ms * -27%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (1031 - 1077, n=2)
1054 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)
1031.23 ms *
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
862.4 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

三星手机采用了 UFS 3.1 技术，这在同价位手机中是比较可靠的，但在我们的测试中，其写入速度明显较慢。不过，我们已经观察到类似的情况在 Galaxy A35.

Samsung Galaxy A36 5GSamsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5GXiaomi Poco X7Nothing Phone (3a)Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
184%
163%
217%
275%
364%
Sequential Read 256KB
968.34
529.32
-45%
1009.67
4%
947.4
-2%
1031.34
7%
1728 ?(950 - 2037, n=106)
78%
2054 ?(270 - 4384, n=186, last 2 years)
112%
Sequential Write 256KB
166.77
270
62%
833.64
400%
915.23
449%
1001.28
500%
1155 ?(166.8 - 2004, n=106)
593%
1667 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=186, last 2 years)
900%
Random Read 4KB
233.98
244.24
4%
248.81
6%
100.16
-57%
245.48
5%
285 ?(173.5 - 543, n=106)
22%
286 ?(47.6 - 504, n=186, last 2 years)
22%
Random Write 4KB
62.58
62.59
0%
266.92
327%
226.88
263%
285.24
356%
316 ?(62.6 - 499, n=107)
405%
327 ?(9.4 - 964, n=186, last 2 years)
423%

游戏 -Galaxy A36 可以运行游戏吗？

虽然这款手机的 Adreno GPU 性能较弱，并不适合玩游戏，但我们在运行《PUBG Mobile》时，使用GameBench 应用程序，在中低细节设置下仍测得了 60fps 的稳定帧率。应用程序在运行《PUBG Mobile》时测得了60fps 的帧率。即使是要求苛刻的游戏《源氏冲击》，Galaxy A36 在低图形设置下的平均帧率也达到了 43fps。在运行旧版游戏时，面板的原生刷新率 120 Hz 在某些情况下甚至达到了极限。不过 骁龙 6 代 3不支持光线追踪，Adreno 710 的未来适用性也存在一些问题。 Adreno 710在现代游戏中的适用性存在一些疑问。

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; Dead Trigger 2: Ø114.6 (96-120)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø43 (25-60)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø24 (18-44)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.5 (47-61)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59 (44-60)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (34-41)

排放 - 三星智能手机没有节流

温度

在我们的测试中，Galaxy A36 的温度发展不成问题，即使在长期负载的情况下也是如此。在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中，它的性能发展保持稳定，没有出现任何明显的节流现象。

Max. Load
 41.6 °C40.6 °C38.1 °C 
 42.3 °C41.2 °C37.5 °C 
 42.1 °C41.5 °C37.7 °C 
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 40.3 °C
37.5 °C39.7 °C42.9 °C
36.1 °C41.1 °C43.5 °C
37 °C39.8 °C41.6 °C
Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 39.9 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 %
05101520Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.42 (5.38-5.44)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.7 (20.6-20.8)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø20.8 (20.7-20.9)

发言人

该手机的立体声扬声器声音响亮，在同价位手机中音效不错，但Galaxy A36 缺乏层次感，高音过于明显。此外，该设备还可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙输出声音。不过，后者支持的音频编解码器相对较少。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.839.52528.134.73124.429.74020.5305029.5356318.930.98017.734.810015.836.212513.439.616013.953.620011.251.925010.453.731511.759.140010.163.25008.865.86308.965.48009.271.710009.876.6125010.378.5160010.879.6200011.880.2250011.380.23150128140001381.9500012.677.5630012.877.4800012.975.51000013.375.41250013.559.51600013.656.5SPL23.890.5N0.582.1median 11.8median 75.4Delta1.510.627.329.426.238.625.935.329.235.835.633.625.938.522.137.717.840.717.144.318.153.914.252.214.156.310.757.31157.312.863.511.161.51268.711.775.21280.312.878.512.480.612.381.713.380.6138213.580.213.277.813.87513.774.313.470.313.362.524.990.90.681.3median 13.2median 74.3111.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A36 5GSamsung Galaxy A35 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 -Galaxy A36 充电相当快

耗电量

在我们的测量过程中，Galaxy A36 在空闲模式下的效率并不高，而高通 SoC 在空闲模式下的效率更高。 高通 SoC在负载情况下的能耗相当高，接近 11 瓦。

这款三星中端手机的 5,000 毫安时电池现在的充电功率为 45 瓦，而不是前代产品的 25 瓦。有趣的是，A 系列手机的充电速度比Galaxy S25 更快，这不禁让人瞠目结舌。我们在测试中没有获得合适的电源适配器，但我们注意到使用小米电量包 25000 充电时间约为 70 分钟。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.27 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.86 / 1.75 / 1.82 Watt
Load midlight 5.31 / 10.95 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh		Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
13%
18%
19%
1%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.86
0.89
-3%
1.17
-36%
1.09
-27%
0.93
-8%
0.83 ?(0.8 - 0.86, n=2)
3%
0.872 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=159, last 2 years)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.75
1.99
-14%
1.38
21%
1.28
27%
1.67
5%
1.425 ?(1.1 - 1.75, n=2)
19%
1.415 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=159, last 2 years)
19%
Idle Maximum *
1.82
2.14
-18%
1.41
23%
1.31
28%
1.68
8%
1.66 ?(1.5 - 1.82, n=2)
9%
1.556 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=159, last 2 years)
15%
Load Average *
5.31
4.57
14%
3.58
33%
3.25
39%
3.69
31%
7.01 ?(5.31 - 8.7, n=2)
-32%
7.04 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=150, last 2 years)
-33%
Load Maximum *
10.95
12.31
-12%
8.44
23%
8.62
21%
4.75
57%
10.5 ?(10.1 - 11, n=2)
4%
10.6 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=150, last 2 years)
3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.18 (1.064-10.1)
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.5 (1.215-7.76)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.221 (1.179-1.336)
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.929 (0.868-1.382)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.08 (4.83-5.23)
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.37 (2.88-3.92)
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.221 (1.179-1.336)
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.929 (0.868-1.382)

运行时间

在我们的电池测试中，三星这款中档手机的续航时间表现良好。在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的情况下，测试结果最具可比性。在这种情况下，Galaxy A36 在使用 WLAN 上网时可持续近 15 个小时。在没有 WiFi 的情况下播放无尽的视频时，我们甚至注意到它的续航时间超过了 24 小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 26min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 135)
14h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
24h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 27min
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G
5110 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh		Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
2%
18%
15%
Reader / Idle
2006
2600
30%
1754
-13%
2567
28%
H.264
1456
1401
-4%
1423
-2%
1610
11%
WiFi v1.3
888
902
2%
1206
36%
1049
18%
1233
39%
Load
267
262
-2%
236
-12%
218
-18%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Galaxy A36 凭借其长期的软件支持和吸引人的功能，成为经济实惠的中端智能手机中的佼佼者。

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G - 05/07/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
47 / 69 → 68%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
15 / 55 → 27%
Application Performance
61 / 85 → 72%
AI Performance
48%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
73%
Average
76%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
91.5%
Materials
50%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
95.8%
Repairability
60%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 81.2%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A36 5G 评测--经济实惠的智能手机，注重安全和高端质感
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-05-12 (Update: 2025-05-12)