对 vivo iQOO 15 的评价
有了 iQOO 15，买家在中端价位段获得了出色的整体包装，并以大幅降低的价格购买了一款可提供旗舰级性能的设备。
除了超亮 144 Hz OLED 面板和骁龙 8 精英 5 代等显而易见的高端规格外，这款游戏智能手机在仔细观察后也给人留下了深刻印象。出色的超声波指纹传感器、强劲的电池续航能力和高品质的振动马达让日常使用变得真正愉悦。同样，该机的机身采用了近乎无边框的设计，主摄像头的表现也令人惊喜。
对于一款标榜 "特殊散热 "的游戏手机来说，高发热量和非常明显的 SoC 节流现象有些令人失望。同样，相当弱的扬声器性能也不太适合一款面向游戏玩家的智能手机。
如果不介意进口中国版本并接受其在欧洲的缺点，那么购买这款手机不会有错。
Pros
Cons
vivo iQOO 15 的价格和上市时间
vivo iQOO 15 在中国上市，配备 12GB 内存和 256GB UFS 存储，售价 4199 元人民币（约合 500 欧元）。在 TradingShenzhen，这款游戏智能手机的进口起价为，约合 580 欧元。而我们的测试机对应的是 12GB 内存和 512GB 存储空间的配置。iQOO 15 还提供全球版本，包括印度市场；但尚未正式宣布在欧洲上市。
vivo iQOO 15 的规格
外壳和功能 - 通过 IP69 认证的游戏智能手机
iQOO 15 有多个版本，不同颜色的重量略有不同。这是因为 vivo 在后面板上使用了不同的材料，包括玻璃和玻璃纤维。制造商没有透露正面使用的是哪种保护玻璃。
iQOO 15 的机身通过了 IP68 和 IP69 标准认证，采用金属边框，手感优质。对于游戏智能手机来说，近 91% 的屏占比尤其值得一提。窄边框设计使Android 手机呈现出近乎无边框的外观。
功能包括 NFC 芯片、支持 USB OTG（用于连接 U 盘）、红外端口和快速 USB Type-C 3.2 端口。在摄像头模块周围，iQOO 15 还配备了彩色 LED 灯环，可用于电池状态、游戏指示灯和通知等多种场景。
通信和操作 -Android 配备 Wi-Fi 7 和 5G 功能的智能手机
iQOO 15 通过蓝牙 6.0 和 Wi-Fi 7 提供最先进的连接功能。不过，我们的中国版本只能部分接入快速的 6 GHz 频段。在我们的测试中，并非所有路由器都能与 6 GHz 频道建立连接，数据吞吐量相对较低。
在欧洲，这款游戏智能手机可以使用双 SIM 卡设置。它支持重要的 LTE 频段，如 Band 20 和 Band 28，以及广泛的 5G 频率，这意味着不会出现连接问题。
超声波指纹传感器是该价位手机的一大亮点，它运行快速、可靠。振动电机也以清晰、高质量的触觉反馈给人留下深刻印象，而快速的 144 Hz OLED 显示屏和高达 3,200 Hz 的触摸采样率则为用户带来了出色的整体体验。
| Networking | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续性 -Android 16 和 vivo 手机的长期更新
尽管 iQOO 15 只在中国销售，但它非常适合在欧洲使用。OriginOS 6 包含完整的德语语言支持，提供成熟、全面的用户体验。制造商承诺提供 5 次Android 版本升级和 7 年的安全补丁，不过测试时的最新安全补丁要追溯到 2025 年 9 月。
安装和访问 Google Play 商店都没有问题，而且Android Auto 原生支持。虽然某些软件限制无法解决，包括不支持 eSIM、不兼容 Wear OS 智能手表以及只能访问中国特定的人工智能服务，但可以删除中文应用程序。
可持续发展的透明度仍然有限。vivo 没有提供关于可回收材料比例的具体信息，也没有强调用户的可修复性，而且很难验证。值得肯定的是，包装似乎完全不使用塑料。
摄像头 - 游戏智能手机采用索尼传感器和图像稳定器
虽然 iQOO 15 主要是一款游戏手机，并没有把重点放在摄像头上，但它仍然提供了令人满意的照片质量。vivo 为该设备配备了索尼 IMX921 主摄像头，该摄像头也用于 vivo X200 FE.
在日光下，1/1.56 英寸传感器和光学防抖功能可拍摄出非常出色的照片。清晰度和动态范围令人信服，色彩还原也没有什么可批评的。但在弱光环境下，iQOO 15 显示出相对较小的索尼 IMX921 传感器的典型局限性。
机身背面的方形摄像头模块除了主摄像头外，还配备了两个额外的 5000 万像素传感器，包括一个具有三倍光学变焦和 OIS 功能的潜望式长焦镜头，以及一个超广角镜头。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angle lens
显示屏 - 中端价位的超亮 OLED 屏幕
iQOO 15 配备了一块 6.85 英寸大屏幕三星 AMOLED 显示屏，分辨率高达 1440p，像素密度为 508 ppi。刷新率达到 144 Hz，而 vivo 规定的 HDR 峰值亮度高达 6000 尼特。在更注重实用性的 APL18 测试中，我们测得的亮度为 2,885 cd/m²，略高于制造商的 HBM 规格 2,600 nits。
由于这是一款 OLED 面板，亮度是通过脉宽调制控制的。根据制造商的说法，iQOO 15 采用 2160 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光，以减少潜在的负面影响，如可见的闪烁。我们使用 Rigol 软件进行的测量显示，基本频率约为 560 赫兹。
我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和光度计对显示器色彩校准进行了评估，结果显示与参考值的偏差很小。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1137 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.52 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.265
CCT: 6560 K
| Vivo iQOO 15 AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.9" | Honor 400 Pro AMOLED, 2800x1280, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi 15T Pro AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro AMOLED, 2510x1156, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 26% | -35% | 2% | 33% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1137 | 1535 35% | 1136 0% | 1064 -6% | 1717 51% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1113 | 1531 38% | 1132 2% | 1069 -4% | 1721 55% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 99 3% | 98 2% | 99 3% | 98 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.52 | 1.1 28% | 3.5 -130% | 1.3 14% | 1 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.05 | 2.2 28% | 5.5 -80% | 3.4 -11% | 2.2 28% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.7 26% | 2.4 -4% | 2 13% | 1.7 26% |
| Gamma | 2.265 97% | 2.29 96% | 2.02 109% | 2.22 99% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6560 99% | 6511 100% | 6322 103% | 6578 99% | 6574 99% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 561.3 Hz Amplitude: 19 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 561.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 561.3 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8081 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命--游戏智能手机中的最佳处理器
iQOO 15 采用了 骁龙 8 第五代精英版高通公司目前的高端 SoC。在我们的基准测试中，这款游戏智能手机的性能达到了很高的水平。在图形测试中，iQOO 15 的表现尤其抢眼。 Adreno 840在 GFXBench 4K 测试中取得了 56 fps 的强劲成绩。
不过，vivo 手机的高发热量导致了热引起的节流，我们在 3DMark 压力测试中触发了这一现象。在这些测试中测得的表面温度相对较高。
iQOO 15 配备了 7,000 毫安时电池，支持高达 100 瓦的有线充电，而无线充电最高可达 40 瓦。在现实的 Wi-Fi 电池测试中，显示屏亮度调整到 150 cd/m²，智能手机实现了近 24 小时的良好运行时间。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 - 480, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
| Vivo iQOO 15 | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | Xiaomi 15T Pro | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -11% | -6% | 12% | 5% | -32% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2556.87 | 3756.44 47% | 3219.93 26% | 3959.14 55% | 3697 ? 45% | 2235 ? -13% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 2589.26 | 2450.19 -5% | 3593.03 39% | 3833.02 48% | 3205 ? 24% | 1871 ? -28% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 453.54 | 382.44 -16% | 426.1 -6% | 309.91 -32% | 387 ? -15% | 297 ? -35% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 689.01 | 198.68 -71% | 110.46 -84% | 521.31 -24% | 454 ? -34% | 343 ? -50% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor 400 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | |
| Vivo iQOO 15 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
Vivo iQOO 15 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi 15T Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Vivo iQOO 15 7000 mAh | Honor 400 Pro 5300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 4900 mAh | Xiaomi 15T Pro 5500 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 6210 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 23.7 | 20.6 -13% | 15.1 -36% | 20.9 -12% | 22.8 -4% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
vivo iQOO 15 以非常公道的价格提供了顶级硬件。遗憾的是，这款游戏手机目前只能通过进口方式在欧洲销售。
Vivo iQOO 15
- 01/09/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 88.6%  | Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 NEOYUKL Privacy Screen Prote... 2. $8.00 MTRIEBA [3 Pack] Compatible ... 3. $15.80 Rfvzubemok Compatible with V... List Price: 580€ | 215 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.85" 3168x1440 508 PPI AMOLED |
2. 82.5%  | Honor 400 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind For Honor 400 Pro 5G... 2. $9.88 LXEEOLX [2 Pack Screen Prote... 3. $11.99 AKABEILA [2 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 800€ | 205 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2800x1280 460 PPI AMOLED |
3. 85.6%  | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.98 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 2. $6.99 amFilm Auto-Alignment OneTou... 3. $7.99 Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design... List Price: 809€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 382 PPI AMOLED |
4. 86.1%  | Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Xiaomi 15T Pro 5... 2. $6.99 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for... 3. $7.59 Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 1... List Price: 1000€ | 210 g | 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
5. 85.4%  | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $338.00 XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 2. $8.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 P... 3. $349.50 XIAOMI Poco X7 PRO 5G + 4G L... List Price: 700€ | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.59" 2510x1156 419 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
