Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G 评测：这款小米手机的亮点成为海滩噩梦

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

户外运动爱好者的梦想

小米公司新推出的Android 手机以经济实惠的高端中端智能手机自居，配备超大硅碳电池、超亮 OLED 屏幕和钛金属结构。不过，我们对Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的评测并不都是正面的，购买前请务必阅读。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 02/19/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Smartphone Touchscreen

关于小米Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的评价

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 并不是一款适合建筑工地或户外运动爱好者使用的经典智能手机，但它确实具备坚固耐用手机的功能，如防水防尘、防摔和耐高温。不过，由于采用了超薄设计，这些优点乍一看并不明显。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

从理论上讲，OLED 大屏幕由于峰值亮度高，非常适合户外使用。但在日常使用中，亮度的强烈衰减会在短时间内成为户外可读性的问题。

在处理器的选择上，小米并没有给自己带来任何好处。Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 在目标价格区间内并不是一款性能高配机型，而它的姊妹机型 Poco F7 在这方面显然是更好的选择。

Pros

+ 坚固耐用

+ 多种 BT 编解码器

+ 漂亮的 OLED 面板，带 PWM 调光功能

+ 运行时间长

+ 无 SoC 节流

Cons

- SoC 可以更快

- 最大亮度迅速降低

- 只有 USB 2.0 和 UFS 2.2

- 日常使用时卡顿

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的定价和上市时间

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 提供基本版本，零售价略低于 500 欧元，有棕色、蓝色和黑色三种颜色可供选择。这款中档智能手机可直接从制造商或亚马逊网站购买。

在美国，Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的 12 GB + 512 GB 版本可以从美国亚马逊购买，售价为 510 美元，但该智能手机仅兼容 T-Mobile 网络。

Amazon

XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Plus 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC 6.83" 120Hz 200MP Ultra Camera Model 2510ERA8BG Unlocked Dual Sim Liberado (Black)

关于小米Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的评价
小米Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的规格
构造防水防尘Redmi Note
功能 Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备 UFS 内存
软件：中端小米智能手机仍使用Android 15
通信和全球导航卫星系统：没有 Wi-Fi 的小米手机 7
电话功能和语音质量：Redmi Note 配备 eSIM 卡
摄像头：Redmi Note 15 Pro+，配备 200 万像素传感器和 OIS
配件和保修：小米省略了红米智能手机的电源适配器
输入设备和操作：中档手机，触摸响应高达 2,560 赫兹
显示屏 Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备大型 OLED 和 PWM 调光功能
性能：Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备高通骁龙 7s 第 4 代处理器
排放物：炫酷的中端智能手机
能源和电池寿命：Android 没有无线充电功能的手机
Notebookcheck 对Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的总体印象
潜在替代品比较

新款Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 属于小米的高端中端产品系列。与中国同类产品相比，欧洲版不仅处于劣势，而且在全球销售时也略有改动。

我们测试样品中的电池容量从 7,000 毫安时缩减至 6,500 毫安时，但充电速度比中国市场的版本更快，最高可达 100 W。

小米还为欧洲市场升级了主摄像头的像素，不再使用 5000 万像素的传感器，而是使用了三星的 200 万像素传感器。不过，与中国机型或 Poco M8 Pro 的 Light Fusion 800 相比，它在低光场景下的表现略逊一筹。 Poco M8 Pro.

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的规格

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (Redmi Note 15 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, 1 x 2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Cortex-A720 / A520

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 810

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

6.83 inch 19.5:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB

, 463 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG, Miracast, IR Blaster

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.19 x 163.34 x 78.31

Battery

6500 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.7, 23 mm, 1/1.4", OIS) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, 15 mm, 1/4.0")
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 1/3.0")

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, USB cable, case, info material, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.949 W/kg head, 0.997W/kg body, GPS: L1, GLONASS: G1, BDS: B1I +B1C, Galileo E1, QZSS:L1, A-GPS, BT codec: SBC, AAC, LC3, aptX, aptX HD, aptX TWS, aptX Adaptive, LHDC-5.0, LDAC, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof

Released

12/12/2025

Weight

208 g

Price

530 Euro

Amazon

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

构造防水防尘Redmi Note

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G 尽管外壳相当轻薄，但其坚固的设计给人留下了深刻印象。这款中档手机具有 IP68 防尘防水功能和 "钛金属结构"，可保证从 2.5 米高处跌落。

康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 用于保护显示屏，而背面则由玻璃纤维或素食皮革（均为塑料材料）制成。

我们在木地板上进行了约 1.5 米高的跌落测试，小米智能手机的做工令人印象深刻，没有明显的损坏迹象。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Xiaomi Poco F7 Honor Magic8 Lite Google Pixel 9a Sony Xperia 10 VII DIN A6 ❌

功能 Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备 UFS 内存

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 具有良好的功能，但在 USB 速度方面受到限制。该接口仅支持 USB 2.0 标准，在我们的测试中，数据传输速率受到严重限制。我们使用三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 只达到了 30 MB/s。外置硬盘可以用 FAT32（最大 2 TB）和 exFAT（最大 128 GB）格式化。也支持 NTFS 格式。

此外，Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 还配备了用于非接触式支付的 NFC 和红外线发射器。这款中档手机还具有 USB On-The-Go (OTG)功能，可快速连接记忆棒等外部 USB 设备。

软件：中端小米智能手机仍使用Android 15

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 在软件更新方面有些令人失望，因为小米仍然为其中档手机提供 HyperOS 2 和Android 15。至少，制造商承诺升级到Android 19 和安全更新，直到 2032 年。后者将每季度推出一次。

引人注目的是引人注目的是频繁出现的广告、这些广告只能在有限范围内停用。

可持续性

小米没有提供有关Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的生态足迹或可能的环保工作的信息。这款中端智能手机在 EPREL 数据库中的可修复性等级为 C。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：没有 Wi-Fi 的小米手机 7

小米手机在我们的 Wi-Fi 测量中展现了光与影。虽然我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 采用了 Wi-Fi 6E 技术，使用 6 GHz 频道进行传输，但传输速率不足 1,000 Mbps，速度之慢令人惊讶。不过，这在日常使用中几乎不会有什么影响。

在移动时，Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 最多支持接入移动 5G 网络，但也有 LTE 频段可供选择。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	949 (min: 468) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	854 (min: 817) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	949 (min: 478) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	949 (min: 940) MBit/s ∼61%
Honor Magic8 Lite 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	500 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	444 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼47%
Google Pixel 9a Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 receive AXE11000	920 (min: 458) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	807 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	780 (min: 731) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	833 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼54%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	920 (min: 620) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	837 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1814 (min: 872) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1547 (min: 1408) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	982 (min: 492) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	939 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	892 (min: 522) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	674 (min: 627) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1698 (min: 1552) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1539 (min: 695) MBit/s ∼99%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	951 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	934 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1371 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1331 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	692 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	717 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1281 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1373 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼89%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (478-953)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1698 (1552-1819)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø948 (940-950)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1515 (695-1584)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (468-969)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (522-975)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø853 (817-865)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø673 (627-734)

手机的定位是通过单频全球卫星网络确定的。我们用 Garmin Venu 2 检查了定位质量。在路线上可以看到轻微的误差，这款中档手机喜欢偷工减料。不过，提供的路线指引还是非常准确的。

Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 与 Garmin Venu 2 的对比

电话功能和语音质量：Redmi Note 配备 eSIM 卡

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 最多可使用两张 nano SIM 卡，包括双卡 5G + 5G 功能以及 eSIM 集成。此外，它还支持 VoLTE 和通过家庭 Wi-Fi 进行通话。小米离线通讯的 15T 系列还提供基于蓝牙协议的离线通信。

语音质量不错。声音还原清晰，音量足够大。

摄像头：Redmi Note 15 Pro+，配备 200 万像素传感器和 OIS

后置摄像头的设置与前代产品相比没有太大变化前代.1/1.4 英寸 200 万像素传感器在光线条件良好的情况下也能提供令人满意的清晰度和自然的色彩还原，不过白平衡有时不够准确。

不过，在弱光环境下，尽管三星 HP3 拥有 f/1.7 的大光圈，但也只能提供部分令人信服的效果。

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的缩放完全采用数字技术。由于像素较高，2 倍放大是无损的，在强光下令人印象深刻。不过，超过 4 倍变焦后，就几乎没有任何细节了。

超广角镜头的分辨率很低，仅为 800 万像素，如果没有 OIS 和固定对焦，拍摄效果并不理想。与该价位段的竞争产品类似，这款镜头更多的是为了参数表而非实际用途。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light Ultrawide angle 5x zoom

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修：小米省略了红米智能手机的电源适配器

小米为其中端手机提供了一条 USB Type-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡弹出工具和一个保护盖。在德语国家，配送范围不包括配套的电源适配器。

小米只提供保修智能手机的保修期为 12 个月，不影响零售商自己的保修。小米关怀保险套餐可选，起价 39 欧元。

输入设备和操作：中档手机，触摸响应高达 2,560 赫兹

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 使用光学传感器识别指纹。这在日常使用中效果非常好。如果想用脸部解锁，则必须使用可靠性更低的 2D 人脸识别技术。

通过触摸屏输入的信息会以高达 480 Hz 的采样率快速处理，在游戏中采样率可高达 2,560 Hz。不过，这款中端智能手机经常出现卡顿现象，有时性能还会明显下降。

尤其是当后台运行很多进程或Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 从待机状态长时间运行时，往往会出现这种情况。

小米为这款中端手机安装了一个不错的 X 轴线性振动电机，尽管它在触觉反馈方面还没有达到顶级水平。

显示屏 Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备大型 OLED 和 PWM 调光功能

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备了 6.83 英寸 AMOLED 大屏幕。面板刷新率为 120 Hz，像素密度高达 447 ppi。

根据我们的测量（HDR：2,965 cd/m²，APL18：3,146 cd/m²），我们可以确认广告宣传的峰值亮度为 3,200 尼特，不过峰值亮度会在短时间内降至 990 cd/m² 以下。在日常使用中，手动亮度控制也会降低最大亮度（578 cd/m²，阳光模式 779 cd/m²）。

这款中档手机的 PWM 频率高达 3,840 Hz，可能会对敏感人群造成眼睛灼伤或头痛，但由于采用了直流调光和高频 PWM 调光相结合的方式，这种概率相当低。


1715 cd/m²	1711 cd/m²	1708 cd/m²
1711 cd/m²	1699 cd/m²	1709 cd/m²
1717 cd/m²	1701 cd/m²	1709 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1717 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1708.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.42 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1699 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6660 K

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Honor Magic8 Lite OLED, 2640x1200, 6.8"	Google Pixel 9a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"	Sony Xperia 10 VII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1"	Xiaomi Poco F7 AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen		-3%	4%	1%	3%	3%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1699	1754 3%	1978 16%	820 -52%	1616 -5%	1210 -29%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1709	1748 2%	1775 4%	823 -52%	1637 -4%	1222 -28%
Brightness Distribution (%)	99	98 -1%	76 -23%	97 -2%	95 -4%	92 -7%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.7	1.5 12%	1.1 35%	1 41%	1.1 35%	1 41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.4	3.5 -3%	3 12%	1.8 47%	2.8 18%	2.7 21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	2.4 -33%	2.2 -22%	1.4 22%	2.2 -22%	1.5 17%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.24 ^98%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6660 ^98%	6358 ^102%	6622 ^98%	6544 ^99%	6639 ^98%	6509 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3318 cd/m² +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3146 cd/m²
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2653 cd/m² -16%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1785 cd/m² -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1280 cd/m² -59%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1073 cd/m² -66%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5962 cd/m² +101%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3272 cd/m² +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3081 cd/m² +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2965 cd/m²
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2679 cd/m² -10%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1074 cd/m² -64%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 16.9 %
Secondary Frequency: 3846 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8016 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

我们使用卡尔曼公司的光度计和软件进行分析，结果显示Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 在 P3 色彩空间中的平均 Delta-E 偏差较低。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.556 ms rise
1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6105 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.532 ms rise
1.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5965 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).

性能：Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备高通骁龙 7s 第 4 代处理器

小米安装了骁龙 7s 第四代处理器Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 中安装了骁龙 7s Gen 4 处理器，在基准测试中的表现略好于前代产品前代.不过，制造商并没有利用它实现大飞跃。

考虑到日常使用中的卡顿问题，这款骁龙 8s 第 4 代的 Poco F7会是更好的选择。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	2129 Points +74%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=208, last 2 years)	1732 Points +42%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1702 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (1221 - 1241, n=4)	1233 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	1221 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	1162 Points -5%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	1112 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	999 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	6792 Points +112%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=208, last 2 years)	5098 Points +59%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	4453 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (3183 - 3311, n=4)	3241 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	3239 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	3209 Points
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	3124 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	2943 Points -8%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	15973 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=181, last 2 years)	14800 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	14463 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (13921 - 14915, n=4)	14380 Points -1%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	14164 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	13874 Points -4%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	11398 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	10086 Points -30%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2856, n=115, last 2 years)	1159 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (765 - 792, n=2)	779 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	765 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	759 Points -1%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	746 Points -2%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	Points -100%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	Points -100%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	9930 Points +83%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=144, last 2 years)	7697 Points +42%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	5617 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	5432 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	5402 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (5076 - 5432, n=4)	5292 Points -3%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	5154 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	5056 Points -7%
System
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	12947 Points +60%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=144, last 2 years)	11493 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	10153 Points +25%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	9972 Points +23%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	9674 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (8102 - 8216, n=4)	8153 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	8113 Points
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	5170 Points -36%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	11058 Points +60%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=144, last 2 years)	8773 Points +27%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	7126 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	6894 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (5338 - 6894, n=4)	6199 Points -10%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	5876 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	5642 Points -18%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	4094 Points -41%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	33256 Points +237%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=144, last 2 years)	26056 Points +164%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	18582 Points +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (9882 - 10339, n=4)	10040 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	9882 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	9482 Points -4%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	8733 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	7559 Points -24%
Web
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	2042 Points +28%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1794 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2587, n=144, last 2 years)	1701 Points +6%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	1604 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	1599 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	1567 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (1526 - 1599, n=4)	1559 Points -3%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	1498 Points -6%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	37104 Points +324%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=129, last 2 years)	19376 Points +121%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	16446 Points +88%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	9276 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	8756 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (8216 - 8756, n=3)	8527 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	8460 Points -3%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=111, last 2 years)	20732 Points +2775%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	1389 Points +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	721 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (n=1)	721 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	702 Points -3%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	690 Points -4%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=76, last 2 years)	702 Points +185%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	468 Points +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	246 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (244 - 247, n=4)	246 Points 0%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	216 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	138 Points -44%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=76, last 2 years)	2788 Points +1024%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	466 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	248 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (245 - 248, n=4)	247 Points 0%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	217 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	141 Points -43%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=76, last 2 years)	4123 Points +514%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	1028 Points +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	672 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (571 - 672, n=4)	606 Points -10%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	502 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192	398 Points -41%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=39, last 2 years)	648 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	194 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (n=1)	111 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	96.6 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 12288	6000 Points +170%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=82, last 2 years)	5276 Points +137%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 12288	2224 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (2013 - 2224, n=3)	2130 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288	1246 Points -44%
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	885 Points -60%

图形处理器为 Adreno 810由于红米智能手机的分辨率高达 1280p，它的性能已达到极限。特别是在要求苛刻的 GFXBench 高级测试中，竞争对手的竞争对手有时会表现得更好。

在 4K 分辨率下，Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 甚至无法达到 10 fps。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4408 Points +300%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2520 Points +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1101 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1039 Points -6%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	955 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	881 Points -20%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4482 Points +304%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2615 Points +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1109 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1054 Points -5%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	992 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	876 Points -21%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	17504 Points +311%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9302 Points +118%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4262 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4131 Points -3%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3766 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3295 Points -23%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8264 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8568 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1697 Points +325%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1038 Points +160%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	399 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	306 Points -23%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1785 Points +343%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1055 Points +162%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	403 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	359 Points -11%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	353 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	309 Points -23%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	104 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98 fps -6%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -42%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -42%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	590 fps +315%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	386 fps +172%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	142 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	131 fps -8%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	124 fps -13%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +107%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +3%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	57 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	311 fps +253%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	201 fps +128%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	84 fps -5%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +173%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +36%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps -5%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	255 fps +286%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	153 fps +132%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	66 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	61 fps -8%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps -17%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	90 fps +291%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +161%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	142 fps +230%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +109%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	43 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -21%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -33%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	87 fps +278%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +157%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -4%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -13%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	79 fps +259%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -9%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps -18%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps -36%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +233%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -3%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -11%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	205 fps +260%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	57 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps -9%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -18%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -33%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	35 fps +265%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.8 fps -8%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.8 fps -19%
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.4 fps -33%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)	253.861 Points +68%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=61, last 2 years)	219 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (150.8 - 187.2, n=4)	172.2 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 144)	150.758 Points
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)	140.264 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143)	123.568 Points -18%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)	19.7 runs/min +70%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)	14.7 runs/min +27%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=120, last 2 years)	14.2 runs/min +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 144)	11.6 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (10.8 - 11.6, n=3)	11.1 runs/min -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)	8.58 runs/min -26%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)	184 Points +47%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=137, last 2 years)	144.1 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (125 - 147, n=3)	138 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 144)	125 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)	110 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143)	107 Points -14%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)	90 Points -28%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)	71781 Points +47%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)	52224 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (48731 - 49622, n=3)	49102 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 144)	48954 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=188, last 2 years)	48415 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143)	37865 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)	37415 Points -24%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143)	1476.1 ms * -82%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=149, last 2 years)	1174 ms * -45%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)	1081.2 ms * -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)	1044 ms * -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (812 - 819, n=3)	815 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 144)	812.4 ms *
Xiaomi Poco F7 (Chrome 138.0.7204.168)	534.1 ms * +34%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G	Honor Magic8 Lite	Google Pixel 9a	Sony Xperia 10 VII	Xiaomi Poco F7	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G	Average 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		92%	28%	35%	204%	-6%	10%	82%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	1034.37	1948.54 88%	1688.82 63%	1022.21 -1%	4042.86 291%	992.72 -4%	1026 ?(529 - 1860, n=13) -1%	2165 ?(270 - 4370, n=195, last 2 years) 109%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	987.09	1828.13 85%	853.5 -14%	973.41 -1%	4035.38 309%	931.68 -6%	936 ?(499 - 1612, n=13) -5%	1852 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=195, last 2 years) 88%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	171.52	344.19 101%	241.03 41%	298.75 74%	346.06 102%	171.2 0%	218 ?(100.2 - 337, n=13) 27%	294 ?(47.6 - 576, n=195, last 2 years) 71%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	213.85	412.87 93%	261.8 22%	354.89 66%	453.7 112%	186.14 -13%	255 ?(186.1 - 390, n=13) 19%	343 ?(9.4 - 987, n=195, last 2 years) 60%

排放物：炫酷的中端智能手机

温度

表面温度很低。3DMark 压力测试也没有发现在计算密集型负载下帧速率有任何明显波动。

Max. Load

Idle


38.8 °C	38.7 °C	37.7 °C
38 °C	38.1 °C	36.8 °C
37.1 °C	37.7 °C	36.6 °C

Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 37.7 °C


37.1 °C	37.3 °C	36.7 °C
36.6 °C	36.9 °C	36.6 °C
34.2 °C	36.7 °C	36.6 °C

Maximum: 37.3 °C
Average: 36.5 °C

Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.8 % +1%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93.4 % -6%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	76.3 % -23%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54.5 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 % +1%
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.5 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.3 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	78.6 % -20%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.4 % -41%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	78.5 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.1 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 %
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.1 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.8 % 0%
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84.5 % -15%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	79.8 % -19%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø6.64 (6.55-6.65)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.29 (6.26-6.43)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.4 (25.3-25.5)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø24.1 (23.1-24.7)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.8 (25.5-26)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø24.6 (24.6-24.8)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.95 (2.93-2.96)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.65 (2.63-2.66)

扬声器

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备了立体声扬声器，低音部分略显单薄。虽然高音有所下降，但中音在粉红噪声中的表现却越来越好。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源和电池寿命：Android 没有无线充电功能的手机

耗电量

电池容量比上一代相比增至 6,500 mAh，充电速度最高可达 100 W。这意味着Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 在理想情况下可在 45 分钟左右充满电。

虽然不支持无线充电，但该电池可用作功率高达 22.5 W 的电源箱。

对于一款 6.83 英寸的智能手机来说，耗电量并不明显。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.21 Watt
Idle	0.96 / 1.18 / 1.3 Watt
Load	3.79 / 7.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G 6500 mAh	Honor Magic8 Lite 7500 mAh	Google Pixel 9a 5100 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 VII 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F7 6500 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 5110 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-94%	-76%	-2%	-36%	-3%	-112%	-31%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.96	1.36 -42%	0.71 26%	0.85 11%	1.18 -23%	1.07 -11%	1.178 ?(0.96 - 1.42, n=4) -23%	0.858 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=156, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.18	2.68 -127%	2.36 -100%	1.11 6%	1.44 -22%	1.26 -7%	4.2 ?(1.18 - 7.21, n=4) -256%	1.434 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=156, last 2 years) -22%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.3	2.76 -112%	2.41 -85%	1.17 10%	1.48 -14%	1.28 2%	4.28 ?(1.3 - 7.24, n=4) -229%	1.614 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=156, last 2 years) -24%
Load Average * (Watt)	3.79		8.24 -117%	4.32 -14%	7.62 -101%	3.7 2%	5.5 ?(3.79 - 8.9, n=3) -45%	6.68 ?(2.3 - 15.4, n=128, last 2 years) -76%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	7.5		15.36 -105%	9.09 -21%	8.92 -19%	7.52 -0%	8.08 ?(7.5 - 8.94, n=3) -8%	10.9 ?(3.53 - 22, n=128, last 2 years) -45%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.57 (1.063-7.85)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.39 (1.069-7.71)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.926 (0.88-1.303)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.801-1.104)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.51 (4.24-4.8)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.15 (3.93-4.98)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.926 (0.88-1.303)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.801-1.104)

电池寿命

在 150 cd/m² 的无线局域网实际测试中，Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的电池续航能力非常出色。其姐妹机型的续航时间则要稍长一些。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 144)		21h 44min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G 6500 mAh	21.7 h
Honor Magic8 Lite 7500 mAh	23 h
Google Pixel 9a 5100 mAh	21.2 h
Sony Xperia 10 VII 5000 mAh	23.9 h
Xiaomi Poco F7 6500 mAh	22.7 h
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 5110 mAh	19.5 h

Notebookcheck 对Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的总体印象

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 兼具耐用性、吸引人的外观和轻便的重量。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G - 02/14/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

51 / 69 → 73%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

92%

Games Performance

19 / 55 → 35%

Application Performance

63 / 85 → 74%

AI Performance

18%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 83%

Camera

66%

Average

67%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
85%

Power Use
97.3%

Repairability
63%

Software Updates
58.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 58.9%

潜在替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 79.4%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: List Price: 530€	208 g	512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED
2. 78%	Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. NEOYUKL Tempered Glass for H... 2. Ibywind for Honor Magic8 Pro... 3. Anbzsign [2+2 Pack] for Hono... List Price: 400€	189 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.79" 2640x1200 427 PPI OLED
3. 81%	Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB	Amazon: 1. Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design... 2. Google Pixel 9a with Gemini ... 3. 3 Pack Screen Protector for ... List Price: 549€	185.9 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED
4. 79.3%	Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB	Amazon: 1. Ibywind for Sony Xperia 10 V... 2. Anoowkoa(2 Pack Designed for... 3. Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... List Price: 449€	168 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10" 2340x1080 422 PPI OLED
5. 85.2%	Xiaomi Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. Ibywind for Xiaomi Poco F7 5... 2. Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P... 3. Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 P...	215.7 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED
6. 79.6%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. XIAOMI Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Pl... 2. Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 3. XIAOMI Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Pl... List Price: 530€	205 g	512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G 评测：这款小米手机的亮点成为海滩噩梦

户外运动爱好者的梦想

关于小米Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的评价

Pros

Cons

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的定价和上市时间

Table of Contents

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的规格

构造防水防尘Redmi Note

尺寸比较

功能 Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备 UFS 内存

软件：中端小米智能手机仍使用Android 15

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统：没有 Wi-Fi 的小米手机 7

电话功能和语音质量：Redmi Note 配备 eSIM 卡

摄像头：Redmi Note 15 Pro+，配备 200 万像素传感器和 OIS

配件和保修：小米省略了红米智能手机的电源适配器

输入设备和操作：中档手机，触摸响应高达 2,560 赫兹

显示屏 Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备大型 OLED 和 PWM 调光功能

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能：Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 配备高通骁龙 7s 第 4 代处理器

排放物：炫酷的中端智能手机

温度

3DMark 压力测试

扬声器

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 5G audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G audio analysis

能源和电池寿命：Android 没有无线充电功能的手机

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 对Redmi Note 15 Pro+ 的总体印象

潜在替代品比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device