配备 8,500 毫安时巨型电池和灯光秀的智能手机--小米 Poco X8 Pro Max 评测

Name: Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max
Brand: Xiaomi

大买卖？

Poco X8 Pro Max 采用 Dimensity 9500s、8500 毫安时电池和 100 瓦快速充电技术，为中端市场树立了新标准。明亮的 6.83 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏、IP68 防护等级和超声波指纹传感器使这款手机的整体配置更加完美。与此同时，它的摄像头和软件也存在不足。我们的深入评测将决定 Poco X8 Pro Max 是否真正对得起其 "Pro Max "的称号。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 06/08/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

对 Poco X8 Pro Max 的评价

Poco X8 Pro Max 是一款不错的中端设备，它有几个真正的优点，但也有一些明显的缺点，使其难以证明自己的价格。

它的优点包括大而明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏、8,500 毫安时的大容量电池（可快速充电 100 瓦）以及强劲的 Dimensity 9500 处理器。IP68 防水防尘等级、NFC 和吸引人的设计使整套配置更加完美。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

另一方面，它的相机系统尽管采用了新的传感器，却很难给摄影爱好者留下深刻印象，这也是一个值得批评的地方：它没有光学变焦，超广角镜头功能较弱，前置摄像头会过度锐化图像。此外，该设备的扬声器声音失真，坦率地说，令人失望。在存储方面，Dimensity 9500s 的不足之处在于带宽较低，其 UFS 4.1 规格只是纸上谈兵。此外，我们还注意到该机在大负荷运行时会出现明显的节流现象，这在游戏过程中尤为明显。

这款手机的软件体验也有不足之处：HyperOS 预装了大量的第三方应用程序和广告，虽然可以删除，但非常恼人。此外，在 2026 年，只有 USB 2.0 接口而没有无线充电功能也是难以接受的。

Poco X8 Pro Max 的底线是，对于优先考虑电池续航时间和纯粹性能的用户来说，它是一款不错的设备；不过，对于那些追求均衡的全能型手机的用户来说，最好还是另寻他处。

Pros

+ 大容量电池

+ 带 LED 光环的高品质结构

+ 通过 IP68 认证

+ 高性能

Cons

- 负载情况下的高节流

- 扬声器声音弱

- 保修期只有 12 个月

- 系统中集成了广告

价格和供应情况

您可以在亚马逊上订购 Poco X8 Pro Max，其中配备 512 GB 存储空间的版本目前售价为 529 美元。

对 Poco X8 Pro Max 的评价
规格Poco X8 Pro Max
外壳 - Poco X8 Pro Max 通过 IP68 认证
连接性 - 只有 USB 2.0 接口，没有无线充电功能
软件 - 2032 年之前的安全补丁
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 没有 6 GHz 无线局域网的 Poco 智能手机
电话功能和通话质量
相机 - 有缺陷的双镜头系统
配件和保修 - Poco X8 Pro Max 附带保护套
输入设备和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的 Poco 手机
显示屏 - 极其明亮，不仅在 HDR 中如此
性能 - Poco 选择了 Dimensity 9500s
游戏 - 高分辨率，高达 120fps
排放 - Poco X8 Pro Max 在负载情况下会出现节流现象
电池续航时间 - Poco X8 Pro Max 内置 8500 毫安时超大容量电池
Notebookcheck 总评分
可能的替代品比较

Poco X8 Pro Max 继 Poco X7 Pro的旗舰机型，但在规格和价格方面都更上一层楼。尽管如此，后者只是在有限的范围内，因为它的价格已经大幅下降，现在与 X7 Pro 相当。

这款手机的 SoC 是真正的升级，因为它属于更高的级别，而不仅仅是一个更新的型号。它的显示屏尺寸也增大了，通信模块也更加现代化。此外，它的电池容量更大了，但摄像头却停滞不前。

规格Poco X8 Pro Max

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Poco X8 Series)

Processor

Mediatek Dimensity 9500s 8c/8t, 1 x 3.7 GHz ARM Cortex-X925, 3 x 3.3 GHz ARM Cortex-X4, 4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, Cortex-X925, X4, A720

Graphics adapter

ARM Immortalis-G925 MC11

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.83 inch 19.5:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 12-bit color depth, 3840-Hz PWM dimming, Wet-Touch 2.0, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 476 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity, OTG, IR blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8) LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 (70M)), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 (70M), 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 162.9 x 77.9

Battery

8500 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon Carbon Anode, battery charge time: 50 %: 25 min, 80 %: 45 min, 100 %: 56 min; Battery charge cycles: 1000

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Light Fusion 600, f/1.5, 26 mm, OIS) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, SCX6000, f/2.2, 15 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (OV20B, f/2.2)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Case, USB-C cable, SIM tool, HyperOS 3.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, LHDC 5.0, LC3 | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L1, L5), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 26.15 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: 0.998 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.993 W/kg | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired) Biometric security: optical fingerprint, 2D facial recognition | Vibration motor: linear | Telephony features: Dual-Nano-SIM, Single-eSIM, Wi-Fi Calling, VoLTE, Xiaomi Offline CommunicationUpdate Policy: 4 years Android-Updates (till 03/2030), 6 years security patches (till 03/2032), fanless, waterproof

Released

03/17/2026

Weight

218 g

Price

470 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - Poco X8 Pro Max 通过 IP68 认证

Poco X8 Pro Max 既不特别轻巧，也不特别紧凑，但握持感仍然不错。其 1.95 毫米的摄像头模块并不高，但放在桌子上时，智能手机还是会有明显的晃动。

它的磨砂铝边框具有高级感，似乎不会留下太多指纹痕迹。它的制造质量很好，手机的大部分缝隙紧密、均匀，只有弧形边缘的不平整度很小。在尝试扭转时，X8 Pro Max 会发出轻微的吱吱声。

根据 IP68 认证，它具有防水和防尘功能。这款小米智能手机有黑色、白色和蓝色三种颜色。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Xiaomi 15T Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro DIN A6 ❌

连接性 - 只有 USB 2.0 接口，没有无线充电功能

小米 Poco X8 Pro Max 只配备了一个速度较慢的 USB 2.0 端口，在我们使用以下设备进行的复制测试中，其速度仅为 26.15 MB/s 三星便携式固态硬盘 T7但它至少支持所有常见的文件格式，如 exFAT 和 NTFS。另一方面，它不支持有线视频输出。

我们还缺少为智能手机无线充电的功能。不过，它配备了红外线发射器（可用于控制电视和空调等）、NFC 和小米离线通信功能。后者可以在 500 米范围内与其他小米手机进行语音通话，而无需蜂窝网络连接。

软件 - 2032 年之前的安全补丁

Poco X8 Pro Max 预装了谷歌Android 16 和小米 HyperOS 3.0。预计四年内可收到系统更新，两年内可收到安全补丁。

除了许多预装的第三方应用程序（都可以卸载）外，小米自己的应用程序中也再次包含了广告，不过不像低价机型那样突出。

可持续性

小米尚未提供 Poco X8 Pro Max 所用材料、回收率或_二氧化碳排放量的具体细节。虽然这款智能手机采用了无塑料包装，但它完全是用塑料薄膜收缩包装的。

截至目前，该智能手机既没有维修手册，也没有替换零件。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 没有 6 GHz 无线局域网的 Poco 智能手机

该设备的蜂窝连接功能支持所有现代标准，包括 5G Sub-6，频率范围广。虽然它支持 Wi-Fi 7，但不支持快速的 6 GHz 频段。

在测试过程中，我们注意到使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 的传输速度超过 900 Mbps。这些速度也很稳定。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	949 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	930 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼89%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	972 (min: 865) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	811 (min: 414) MBit/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	949 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1006 (min: 504) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1589 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1188 (min: 1151) MBit/s ∼76%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	308 (min: 226) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	482 (min: 215) MBit/s ∼46%
Xiaomi 15T Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	909 (min: 474) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	895 (min: 825) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1475 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1558 (min: 1521) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	965 (min: 877) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	899 (min: 822) MBit/s ∼86%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1046 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1278 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1501 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼96%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	694 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	740 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1264 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1399 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼90%

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (808-1664)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1186 (1151-1206)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø949 (926-976)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (474-967)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (904-951)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø987 (504-1018)

在定位跟踪方面，Poco X8 Pro Max 可以访问所有卫星网络。根据规格表，它甚至可以通过中国的北斗网络进行四频定位；但在我们的测试中，这款智能手机却无法连接到 B2b 频段。在室外，它能很快定位，但在室内，则需要很长时间，而且只能获得微弱的信号。

我们在骑车时将 X8 Pro Max 与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。结果表明，智能手机在建筑物之间的定位更准确，但检查我们位置的频率也更低。

电话功能和通话质量

将 Poco X8 Pro Max 放在耳边时，通话质量很自然，能很好地抑制背景噪音。使用扬声器模式时，用户听起来会有点闷，不过，只要不是离智能手机太远，声音还是足够清晰的。

X8 Pro Max 可以使用两张 nano SIM 卡，也可以用 eSIM 卡代替第二个 SIM 卡插槽。

相机 - 有缺陷的双镜头系统

乍一看，这款手机的摄像头设置与 X7 Pro 相比没有任何变化。 X7 Pro.不过，尽管规格相同，但 Poco X8 Pro Max 采用了不同的传感器。另一方面，它的前置摄像头完全相同，自拍效果也很不错--虽然有时会略微过度锐化。视频可以 60fps 的速度全高清录制。

背面的主摄像头现在使用 OmniVision 传感器，在日光下可拍摄出色彩平衡良好的漂亮照片。在某些光线条件下，照片会出现轻微的偏红。虽然摄像头的传感器相对较小，但在拍摄静态物体时，它仍能生成令人印象深刻的图像。变焦完全采用数字技术，在放大 2 倍以内效果良好；超过 2 倍后，画质急剧下降。最大放大倍率可达 10 倍（260 毫米）。

超广角镜头的边缘会出现畸变，景深较浅，最多只能满足社交媒体的拍摄需求。没有微距功能。

视频最多只能以 60fps 的超高清速度录制。视频的稳定性似乎不错。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra-wide angle 5x zoom Low-light

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Canon EOS 90D

在可控光线条件下，Poco X8 Pro Max 的色彩描绘相对准确。

我们的测试图表再现了相当高的锐化程度，但即使是边缘部分，也保留了较高的细节。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max: 4.44 ∆E min: 1.62 - max: 7.88 ∆E

配件和保修 - Poco X8 Pro Max 附带保护套

小米 Poco X8 Pro Max 随附一根 USB 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一个烟灰色硅胶保护套。欧洲机型不附带电源适配器。

这款手机只提供 12 个月的保修服务，但可以通过小米 Care 保险扩大保修范围，因此手机还可以选择额外的损坏和盗窃保险。小米关怀保险的费用大约在 45 美元到 70 美元之间，保险期为两年。

输入设备和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的 Poco 手机

Poco X8 Pro Max 的电容式触摸屏手感舒适、平滑，对所有输入都能做出精确响应。不过，预装的屏幕保护膜产生的摩擦力稍大，而且难以清洁。

设备的线性振动电机可提供清晰的反馈，并可在设置中进行调整。显示屏内的光学指纹传感器具有良好的识别率，可快速解锁智能手机。此外，用户还可以使用前置摄像头解锁手机。

Poco X8 Pro Max 的摄像头周围有两个 LED 灯环，可用作通知灯，也可用于节奏灯或游戏灯效果。

显示屏 - 极其明亮，不仅在 HDR 中如此

Poco X8 Pro Max 的 6.83 英寸（17.35 厘米）AMOLED 显示屏的刷新率为 30 到 120 Hz，但没有使用 LTPO。小米规定亮度可达 3,500 cd/m²。

在显示纯白屏幕时，我们在启用环境光传感器的情况下测得显示屏中心亮度高达 1,107 cd/m²。在没有环境光传感器的情况下，亮度达到 634 cd/m²。如果在设置中启用日光模式，亮度可达 835 cd/m²。在使用缩小的白色区域（APL18）进行测量时，我们测得的亮度为 3,582 cd/m²，而在通过 YouTube 播放 HDR 视频时，我们测得的亮度为 3,538 cd/m²--这些都是非常不错的数值。

在示波器下，我们测得的基本闪烁频率为 120 Hz，这可能是由 BFI（黑框插入）引起的。为了控制手机亮度，小米使用了频率高达 3840 Hz 的脉宽调制（PWM）技术。我们在最低显示亮度下测得的频率非常高，为 2,941 Hz，因此可以认为该面板对眼睛的影响相对较小。

由于 12 位的高色彩深度，我们还测试了面板的时间抖动或帧速率控制（FCR）。这种技术用于使像素在两个或多个色值之间交替，欺骗眼睛感知不同的颜色，从而模拟更高的色深，实现平滑的色彩渐变。不过，这也会给敏感的用户带来负担。我们使用慢动作录像和显微镜对屏幕进行了测试，结果发现屏幕很可能使用了时间抖动技术。


1100 cd/m²	1101 cd/m²	1120 cd/m²
1102 cd/m²	1107 cd/m²	1129 cd/m²
1102 cd/m²	1105 cd/m²	1126 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1129 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1110.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.26 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1107 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6498 K

	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro AMOLED, 2510x1156, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"	Motorola Edge 70 Fusion AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"	Xiaomi 15T AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen		22%	-65%	-11%	-25%	4%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1107	1717 55%	1136 3%	1501 36%	1070 -3%	1034 -7%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1110	1721 55%	1132 2%	1476 33%	1079 -3%	1041 -6%
Brightness Distribution (%)	97	98 1%	98 1%	96 -1%	94 -3%	97 0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1	1 -0%	3.5 -250%	1.52 -52%	1.5 -50%	1 -0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	2.2 19%	5.5 -104%	3.47 -29%	3.9 -44%	2.2 19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	1.7 -0%	2.4 -41%	2.6 -53%	2.5 -47%	1.4 18%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.29 ^96%	2.02 ^109%	2.184 ^101%	2.24 ^98%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6498 ^100%	6574 ^99%	6322 ^103%	6444 ^101%	6648 ^98%	6553 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3775 cd/m² +5%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3582 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3532 cd/m² -1%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3310 cd/m² -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1863 cd/m² -48%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1372 cd/m² -62%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3685 cd/m² +4%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3538 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3475 cd/m² -2%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3267 cd/m² -8%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2824 cd/m² -20%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1990 cd/m² -44%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 13.45 %
Secondary Frequency: 2941 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7819 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置进行的系列测量（虽然在最低亮度下振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是由于缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

当色温设置为暖色时，Poco X8 Pro Max 的显示屏色彩自然。使用出厂设置时，色彩略微偏冷。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.952 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.484 ms rise
0.952 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.468 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4215 ms rise
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.374 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).

在室外，Poco X8 Pro Max 在大多数光线条件下都能轻松阅读。不过，除了眩光之外，容易弄脏的屏幕保护膜也特别令人烦恼。

即使在视角非常平整的情况下，Poco X8 Pro Max 显示屏的亮度也只是略有下降，色彩随之显得略微偏冷。

性能 - Poco 选择了 Dimensity 9500s

Poco X8 Pro Max 的 SoC 是超快的联发科 Dimensity 9500s，其定位低于密度 9500然而，由于它的一些内核以更高的时钟速度运行，它甚至比 9400系列。

在基准测试中，它提供了强劲的 CPU 性能，但无法赶上骁龙 8 精英 5 代在这方面。不过，它的 NPU 却表现出色。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3029 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	2673 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	2673 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	2118 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=199, last 2 years)	1848 Points -31%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1645 Points -38%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1598 Points -40%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	1171 Points -56%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9530 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	8419 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	8419 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	6839 Points -19%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	6239 Points -26%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	6178 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=199, last 2 years)	5492 Points -35%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	3309 Points -61%

Antutu v11 - Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	3120681 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	2809071 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	2809071 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=34, last 2 years)	2614114 Points -7%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	19917 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	17693 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	16481 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	16481 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=157, last 2 years)	15198 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	14805 Points -10%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	13832 Points -16%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1287 Points +8%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1243 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=116, last 2 years)	1213 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	1192 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	1192 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	753 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	11948 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	11948 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	10769 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	9879 Points -17%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	9186 Points -23%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	8278 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=131, last 2 years)	7957 Points -33%
System
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	15404 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	15404 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	14923 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	14640 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=131, last 2 years)	11571 Points -25%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	11256 Points -27%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	8761 Points -43%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	13564 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	12343 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	12125 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	12125 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	10601 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=131, last 2 years)	9069 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	8484 Points -30%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	50403 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	50403 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	38402 Points -24%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	36491 Points -28%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	34498 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=131, last 2 years)	27904 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	26528 Points -47%
Web
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	2165 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	2165 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1987 Points -8%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1754 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=131, last 2 years)	1740 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1731 Points -20%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1731 Points -20%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	66164 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	66164 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	49165 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	49010 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	21631 Points -67%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=115, last 2 years)	20751 Points -69%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	11781 Points -82%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	41402 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	41402 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	37121 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	29244 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=92, last 2 years)	17787 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1206 Points -97%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	1121 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	1121 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	998 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=107, last 2 years)	678 Points -40%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	617 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	324 Points -71%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	235 Points -79%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	8669 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	8669 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	6833 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=107, last 2 years)	2671 Points -69%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	617 Points -93%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	342 Points -96%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	235 Points -97%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	11949 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	11949 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	8965 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=107, last 2 years)	3977 Points -67%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1383 Points -88%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	1096 Points -91%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192	547 Points -95%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	1181 Points
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=30, last 2 years)	592 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	15953 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s, Immortalis-G925 MC11, 12288	12461 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	12461 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=82, last 2 years)	5674 Points -54%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Mali-G720 MP7, 12288	5141 Points -59%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192	934 Points -93%

如 Dimensity 9400一样，它使用 ARM Immortalis-G925 MC11图形处理器，它也支持光线追踪，但少了一个内核。在我们的测试中，这个单元也提供了非常高的性能，尽管事实证明它的速度不如目前的顶级 SoC。在要求苛刻的光线追踪测试--Solar Bay Extreme 测试中，它的性能被三星的 Xclipse 940.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6538 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6300 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4142 Points -34%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3943 Points -37%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3691 Points -41%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1114 Points -82%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6423 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6166 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4421 Points -28%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3954 Points -36%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3840 Points -38%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1148 Points -81%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	24817 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	21390 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	15464 Points -28%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13648 Points -36%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12261 Points -43%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4297 Points -80%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11875 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	10887 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8797 Points -19%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6545 Points -40%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6358 Points -42%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11931 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11300 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8714 Points -23%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6598 Points -42%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6277 Points -44%

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1120 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	937 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	788 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Extreme Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1209 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	924 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	770 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2389 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2263 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1944 Points -14%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1413 Points -38%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1333 Points -41%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2432 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2310 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2017 Points -13%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1422 Points -38%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1272 Points -45%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	778 fps
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	632 fps -19%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	568 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	387 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	379 fps
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	344 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	319 fps -16%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	243 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	111 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	267 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	251 fps -6%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	208 fps -22%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	199 fps -25%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	116 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	112 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps -19%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	69 fps -38%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	184 fps +21%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	152 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	138 fps -9%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	122 fps -20%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	109 fps -28%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	112 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	103 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	73 fps -29%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	53 fps -49%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20.3 fps -80%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	91 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	89 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84 fps -8%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 fps -33%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	55 fps -40%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19.1 fps -79%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps -10%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	84 fps -30%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -67%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	277 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	239 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	156 fps -44%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	153 fps -45%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	144 fps -48%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -83%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	49 fps
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	41 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	34 fps -31%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	28 fps -43%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25 fps -49%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8.9 fps -82%

在 Poco X8 Pro Max 上浏览网页轻而易举。即便如此，我们的基准测试结果显示，它仍无法获得最高分；在 Galaxy S25 FE实际上更快。这可能与其 SoC 有关，不如说是 HyperOS 的功劳。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	210.247 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	187.4 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)	187.393 Points
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=131, last 2 years)	158.5 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion (Chrome 146)	152.9 Points -18%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	139.947 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143)	121.649 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	366 runs/min +30%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)	282 runs/min
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	282 runs/min 0%
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=94, last 2 years)	244 runs/min -13%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	192 runs/min -32%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	20.6 runs/min +17%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)	17.6 runs/min
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	17.6 runs/min 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=106, last 2 years)	15.1 runs/min -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	11.7 runs/min -34%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143)	11.7 runs/min -34%
Xiaomi 15T	9.76 runs/min -45%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	188 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)	162 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	162 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	144 Points -11%
Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141)	143 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=116, last 2 years)	141 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143)	105 Points -35%

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 104, n=12, last 2 years)	64.8 Points +62%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)	40 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	40 Points 0%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	78009 Points +44%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)	54309 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	54309 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=161, last 2 years)	51576 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	47146 Points -13%
Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141)	42452 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143)	30831 Points -43%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro (Chrome 143)	1257.8 ms * -70%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=139, last 2 years)	1071 ms * -45%
Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141)	976.8 ms * -32%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)	882.5 ms * -19%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147)	739 ms *
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s (n=1)	739 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (Chrome 141.0.7390.43)	483 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

从技术上讲，这款智能手机使用的是 UFS 4.1 存储系统，但在 X8 Pro Max 中的运行速度非常慢。这可能是由于 Dimensity 9500 的内存带宽降低所致。好的一面是，这在日常使用中并不明显。

	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max	Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE	Motorola Edge 70 Fusion	Xiaomi 15T	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		139%	49%	77%	-12%	127%	57%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	2067.34	3959.14 92%	3756.44 82%	2049.4 -1%	1954.45 -5%	3635 ?(1954 - 4366, n=39) 76%	2253 ?(270 - 4370, n=185, last 2 years) 9%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1942.35	3833.02 97%	2450.19 26%	1825.9 -6%	1879.62 -3%	3164 ?(339 - 4113, n=39) 63%	1928 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=185, last 2 years) -1%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	366.17	309.91 -15%	382.44 4%	351.2 -4%	278.9 -24%	413 ?(279 - 614, n=39) 13%	309 ?(47.6 - 614, n=185, last 2 years) -16%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	108.21	521.31 382%	198.68 84%	452.1 318%	89.68 -17%	491 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=39) 354%	361 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=185, last 2 years) 234%

游戏 - 高分辨率，高达 120fps

手机的大显示屏和双扬声器为游戏提供了坚实的基础。不过，当以横屏模式握持 Poco X8 Pro Max 时，扬声器有时会被挡住。正如我们使用GameBench进行的测试表明，即使在运行要求苛刻的游戏时，这款智能手机也能提供出色的游戏性能。

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø60.1 (57-61)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø60.1 (54-61)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø117.1 (104-121)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø87.8 (69-91)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø59.8 (49-61)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max; Diablo Immortal; 4.3.0: Ø59.8 (51-61)

排放 - Poco X8 Pro Max 在负载情况下会出现节流现象

温度

在使用 "Burnout Benchmark "进行的压力测试中，设备的表面温度大面积上升，远远超过 40 °C。此外，Poco X8 Pro Max 在玩游戏时手感也很热，但绝不会让人感觉不舒服。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，SoC 的运行速度明显下降。虽然这在日常使用中通常并不明显，但在游戏中却会造成几帧的损失，正如我们上面的 PUBG 测试所显示的那样。

Max. Load

Idle


42.3 °C	42.3 °C	40.2 °C
42.9 °C	41.4 °C	39.6 °C
41.3 °C	42.6 °C	37.8 °C

Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 41.2 °C


38.3 °C	39.9 °C	43 °C
38.1 °C	40 °C	42.1 °C
36.3 °C	38.8 °C	42.3 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 39.9 °C

Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97.7 % +92%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	96.3 % +89%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	62.9 % +23%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 % +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.4 % +5%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	51 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90.4 % +51%
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	77.3 % +29%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	67.5 % +13%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	59.9 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.9 % -7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.8 % -10%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	94.8 % +64%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	68.8 % +19%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	57.9 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55.8 % -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	38.1 % -34%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15T Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	88.5 % +22%
Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72.7 %
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Mali-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	72 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.7 % -18%

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø25 (22.6-37.8)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø16.4 (13.9-25.8)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø80.7 (60.2-118)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.8 (47.6-89.1)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø25.9 (21.6-37.4)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø18.5 (15.8-28.3)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Immortalis-G925 MC11, Dimensity 9500s, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø13.3 (12.5-17.2)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø9.81 (8.65-14.5)

发言人

鉴于其位置和尺寸，Poco 手机上的两个扬声器起初似乎很有前途，但实际上却相当令人失望。即使在中等音量下，声音也会感觉非常憋闷、低沉，有时还会失真。

在这种情况下，最好使用耳机或外置扬声器等外部设备进行音频输出。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Poco X8 Pro Max 内置 8500 毫安时超大容量电池

耗电量

Poco 智能手机的耗电量总体较低，只有在屏幕亮度设置为最低时才会稍高。

X8 Pro Max 完全支持有线充电，但功率高达 100 瓦。这并不局限于小米的 HyperCharge；在我们的测试中，它还支持 USB-PD。使用兼容的电源适配器，电池在 56 分钟内就充满了电。遗憾的是，使用小米公司较旧的 120 瓦电源适配器时，充电速度就没有那么快了，充满电需要三个多小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.09 / 0.14 Watt
Idle	1.19 / 1.23 / 1.43 Watt
Load	6.8 / 11.45 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 8500 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 6210 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 4900 mAh	Xiaomi 15T 5500 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 6000 mAh	Average Mediatek Dimensity 9500s	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		1%	-2%	4%	-0%	0%	-1%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.19	0.83 30%	0.87 27%	0.8 33%	1.07 10%	1.19 ?(n=1) -0%	0.872 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=143, last 2 years) 27%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.23	1.37 -11%	1.48 -20%	1.2 2%	1.29 -5%	1.23 ?(n=1) -0%	1.463 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=143, last 2 years) -19%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.43	1.56 -9%	1.52 -6%	1.26 12%	1.36 5%	1.43 ?(n=1) -0%	1.65 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=143, last 2 years) -15%
Load Average * (Watt)	6.8	8.71 -28%	6.76 1%	6.8 -0%	6.14 10%	6.8 ?(n=1) -0%	6.84 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=112, last 2 years) -1%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.45	8.74 24%	12.89 -13%	14.32 -25%	13.94 -22%	11.5 ?(n=1) -0%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=112, last 2 years) 1%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.68 (1.276-11.6)

Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.71 (1.257-15.7)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.974 (0.931-1.318)

Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.965-1.329)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.2 (10.9-11.4)

Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.4 (11.3-14.3)

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.974 (0.931-1.318)

Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.015 (0.965-1.329)

运行时间

Poco X8 Pro Max 的运行时间非常出色，但在我们将显示屏亮度设置为 150 cd/m² 的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们本以为它的续航时间会比实际的不到 20 小时更长。也许小米可以在未来的更新中解决这个问题。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		35h 13min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 146)		19h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		31h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 12min

	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 8500 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro 6210 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE 4900 mAh	Motorola Edge 70 Fusion 7000 mAh	Xiaomi 15T 5500 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 6000 mAh
Battery runtime		15%	-14%	22%	-14%	-10%
Reader / Idle (h)	35.2		40.6 15%	39.3 12%	26.8 -24%	33 -6%
H.264 (h)	32		25.1 -22%		23.3 -27%	21.3 -33%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	19.8	22.8 15%	15.1 -24%	24.5 24%	17.2 -13%	19.7 -1%
Load (h)	4.2		3.1 -26%	5.4 29%	4.5 7%	4.3 2%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Poco X8 Pro Max 在电池续航时间和性能方面表现出色，但在摄像头、扬声器和某些缺失的功能方面还存在不足。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max - 06/03/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

53 / 69 → 77%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

92%

Games Performance

44 / 55 → 80%

Application Performance

74 / 85 → 86%

AI Performance

76%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

78%

Average

72%

85%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
35%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
96.7%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
89%

Total Sustainability Score: 57.6%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 85.3%	Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC11 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: $465.03 List Price: 470€	218 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED
2. 85.4%	Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: $600.00 List Price: 700€	199 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.59" 2510x1156 419 PPI AMOLED
3. 85.6%	Samsung Galaxy S25 FE Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 809€	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 2340x1080 382 PPI AMOLED
4. 77.4%	Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1	Amazon: List Price: 420€	193 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED
5. 84.8%	Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 650€	194 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

配备 8,500 毫安时巨型电池和灯光秀的智能手机--小米 Poco X8 Pro Max 评测

大买卖？

对 Poco X8 Pro Max 的评价

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格Poco X8 Pro Max

外壳 - Poco X8 Pro Max 通过 IP68 认证

尺寸比较

连接性 - 只有 USB 2.0 接口，没有无线充电功能

软件 - 2032 年之前的安全补丁

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 没有 6 GHz 无线局域网的 Poco 智能手机

电话功能和通话质量

相机 - 有缺陷的双镜头系统

配件和保修 - Poco X8 Pro Max 附带保护套

输入设备和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的 Poco 手机

显示屏 - 极其明亮，不仅在 HDR 中如此

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - Poco 选择了 Dimensity 9500s

游戏 - 高分辨率，高达 120fps

排放 - Poco X8 Pro Max 在负载情况下会出现节流现象

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE audio analysis

电池续航时间 - Poco X8 Pro Max 内置 8500 毫安时超大容量电池

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

运行时间

Notebookcheck 总评分

可能的替代品比较

Transparency

More articles related to this device