小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 智能手机评测：近乎无边框的中端手机，IP68 防护等级和 30 小时电池续航时间

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

转变边界。

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 挑战你对中端智能手机的传统观念。它拥有极薄的显示屏边缘、保护完好的机身、强劲的电池和六年的操作系统更新。但是，花 400 欧元真的能买到高端产品吗？让我们一探究竟。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 01/30/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 的评价

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 以不到 400 欧元的市面价格提供了许多智能手机的功能。在这个价位的手机中，大猩猩玻璃Victus 2（用于保护显示屏）、几乎无边框的直板显示屏、符合IP68标准的防水防尘保护、在我们的实际无线局域网测试中约30小时的超长电池续航时间以及6年的安全更新等功能都给人留下了深刻印象。

此外，亮度极高的 AMOLED 屏幕、不错的主摄像头、可用的扬声器以及包括 SBAS 在内的良好定位能力也进一步增加了它的吸引力。在负载情况下，外壳仅有轻微发热，SoC 的节流也非常小。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

尽管如此，值得注意的是，在这个价位的手机中也有功率更大的手机。例如，在游戏中，这一点就很明显，在要求较高的游戏和高设置下，你往往只能以 40 帧的速度运行。

屏幕使用 PWM 闪烁，但至少可以通过直流调光来缓解这一问题。至于这是否适合您个人，您需要自己确认。

总的来说，小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 没有太多值得批评的地方，因此很有可能再次成为今年的畅销机型。

Pros

+ 电池寿命长

+ 坚固时尚的外壳

+ 明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏，支持 HDR

+ 窄显示屏边缘

+ 几乎没有节流

+ 精确定位

+ 多种手机频段

+ 反向充电高达 22.5 W

+ 精确的屏内指纹传感器

+ 六年安全更新

Cons

- 电力储备少

- PWM 闪烁

- 无 microSD 插槽

- 无线局域网速度一般

- 摄像头图像有时不太清晰

- 带有广告和臃肿软件的 HyperOS

- 目前只有Android 15

价格和供应情况

小米公司对Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 的售价仅为不到 400 欧元，而这正是您在亚马逊德国站上支付的价格。美国亚马逊的8GB + 512GB 版本售价为 425 美元。

其他在线零售商可能会以更便宜的价格提供Redmi Note 15 Pro，在某些情况下最多可节省 90 欧元。

$424.99

XIAOMI Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 8GB) NFC 6.83" 120Hz 200MP Pro AI Camera Model 25080RABDG Unlocked Dual Sim Liberado (Titanium Color)

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 的评价
规格
构建：非常稳健，变化清晰
硬件：400 欧元可买很多东西
软件：长达 6 年的更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统：精确定位
电话功能和语音质量：部分消音
摄像头：200 万像素Redmi Note
配件和保修：带不带充电器？
输入设备和操作：精确的指纹传感器
显示屏：明亮，但有 PWM
性能：轻微减速
游戏：最高可达 60 fps
排放：几乎没有节流
电池续航时间一款持久耐用的中端手机
Notebookcheck 对小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 的总体印象
潜在替代品比较

小米的Redmi Note 15 系列将再次撼动中端市场，而Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 则走在了前列。与上一代产品一样，它凭借明亮的屏幕、强劲的电池和出色的扬声器给竞争对手带来了压力。

但是，小米是否已经吸取了上一代产品的不足，尤其是性能略低的问题？让我们一探究竟。

规格

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Redmi Note 15 Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 4 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78, 4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G615 MP2

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.83 inch 19:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, cpacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus 2, 2.560 Hz Abtastrate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 211 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gyroscope, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 163.6 x 78.1

Battery

6580 mAh Silicon-Carbon, 45 Watt charging, 22.5 Watt reverse charging (via cable)

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix f/1.7, phase shift-AF, OIS, LED flash, Videos @2160p/30fps (camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle (Kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2, Videos @1080p/60fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB cable, bumper, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.949W/kg head, 0.997W/kg body; IP68 certified; 6 years security updates; eSIM support, fanless, waterproof

Weight

210 g

Price

400 Euro

Amazon

$424.99

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

构建：非常稳健，变化清晰

从外观上看，Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 与前代产品有很大不同。显示屏不再横跨四角，而是变成了直线，手机四周都采用了金属边框。

屏占比现已提高到 90%，明显超越了这一细分市场的极限。屏幕周围只剩下一条非常窄的黑色边框，几乎看不出来。

外壳上的其他东西在该价位的手机中也很罕见。大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 是目前最好的屏幕保护眼镜之一，安装在Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 上。

小米在耐用性方面也花了不少心思，为手机配备了多级减震功能。不过，你可以徒手轻轻扭动手机，使其发出咯吱咯吱的响声，这就降低了手机质量给人的印象。

小米手机还按照 IP68 标准进行了防水和防尘保护，因此可以在浅水中游泳。然后，一项特殊功能会利用快速振动将扬声器中的水和灰尘排出。

这款手机的磨砂背壳有黑色、浅蓝色和钛金属三种颜色可供选择，与同类手机相比略重，但也配备了更强劲的电池。

尺寸比较

OnePlus Nord CE 5 Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Motorola Edge 60 Neo DIN A6 ❌

硬件：400 欧元可买很多东西

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 有三种存储版本可供选择：

8 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间：399.90 欧元
8 GB 内存 / 512 GB 存储空间：429.90 欧元
12 GB 内存 / 512 GB 存储空间：449.90 欧元

内存不能通过 microSD 扩展。

在这个价格范围内，你不能指望有一个 USB 3.x 端口，因此没有通过电缆将图像信号输出到显示器的选项。不过，通过 Miracast 可以轻松实现无线传输。

此外，还配备了用于非接触式支付的 NFC 和红外线端口。

软件：长达 6 年的更新

智能手机预装了 HyperOS 2，小米的内部软件基于Android 15。这实际上有些令人失望，因为目前的智能手机通常都是随Android 16 发布的。即使你的手机安装了 HyperOS 3，你也应该警惕，因为根据小米的说法，这可能是基于Android 15 或Android 16 的。

制造商承诺在六年内（即直到 2032 年初）提供安全更新。由于Redmi Note 12 系列仍然使用 Hyper OS 3，但基于Android 15，你应该可以期待至少三次主要的操作系统更新。

HyperOS 与标准的Android 有一些不同之处，但也在一些系统应用程序中集成了广告功能。这只能单独关闭https://www.notebookcheck.com/Werbung-bei-Xiaomi-Smartphones-ausschalten-so-funktioniert-s.1092943.0.html或https://www.reddit.com/r/miui/comments/1c2bjbt/how_to_remove_ads_on_hyperos/?tl=de.一些第三方应用程序也会预装广告，但卸载起来非常容易。

可持续性

小米没有提供任何有关该设备碳足迹或环境可持续发展努力的可靠信息。

尽管如此，小米还是提供了一个自我维修门户网站提供说明和备件。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：精确定位

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 配备了 Wi-Fi 6 作为最快的 Wi-Fi 标准，但无法访问较少使用的 6 GHz 6E 频段。小米显然还吝啬了天线设备，因为这款手机只能达到约 300 Mb/s 的非常普通的速度。这个价位的其他手机速度要快得多。

小米启用了许多移动频率，因此红米手机在国外旅行时也可以使用。在我们的测试中，随机样本的接收效果通常都很好。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	214 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	364 (min: 246) MBit/s ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	400 (min: 196) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	375 (min: 361) MBit/s ∼31%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	763 (min: 678) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	964 (min: 828) MBit/s ∼71%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	536 (min: 421) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1191 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	860 (min: 440) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	752 (min: 713) MBit/s ∼63%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	822 (min: 214) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	820 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1175 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1241 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	700 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	723 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1290 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1367 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼100%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø214 (175-268)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø364 (246-412)

如果您带着Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 走到室外，您将很快被定位，而且精度高达 2 米。SBAS 系统也能帮助实现更高的精确度。

我们还在城市中进行了实际导航测试，并将 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比设备。由于天气原因，这次我们换乘汽车。

小米手机的定位非常准确，我们只在过桥前和过桥时发现了偏差。这些偏差也都在可接受的范围内，因此我们毫不犹豫地推荐Redmi Note 15 Pro 用于导航。

电话功能和语音质量：部分消音

Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 配备了 VoLTE 和 VoWiFi 等重要电话功能。还支持 VoNR（通过 5G 网络拨打电话）。

在测试通话中，语音质量相当不错。不过，对方有时听起来有点闷。

摄像头：200 万像素Redmi Note

Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 的主传感器仍然忠实于 ISOCELL HP3 - 这也是前代产品的主摄像头。

1/1.4 英寸传感器标准采用 16 合 1 像素二进制，像素更大、感光度更高，在大多数情况下分辨率为 1250 万像素。在特殊模式下，可使用完整的 200 万像素分辨率。

只需缩小图像部分就能实现高质量的变焦，即使不使用长焦镜头，Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 也能以高达 4 倍的放大率拍摄出漂亮的照片。

如果在标准设置下使用主摄像头而不进行变焦，则可获得亮度动态不错的照片，但总体清晰度一般。个别细节也显得有些模糊。色彩部分过于饱和。

在光线不足的情况下，自动对焦很吃力，有时拍出的照片模糊不清。

使用广角相机可以拍摄全景照片。不过，这些照片的细节看起来非常模糊，因此不宜放大太多。

前置自拍摄像头分辨率为 2000 万像素。乍一看，照片质量不错，但细节有些模糊。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Pflanze Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light Weitwinkelkamera

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

Apple iPhone 17

Oppo Find X8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

Apple iPhone 17

Oppo Find X8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

Apple iPhone 17

Oppo Find X8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G

Apple iPhone 17

Oppo Find X8 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

在工作室灯光下，测试图的清晰度很好。即使是红色等难以辨认的颜色也不会造成任何问题。

在照明度仅为 1 勒克斯的情况下，图像会变得粗糙得多，但主体仍然清晰可辨。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G: 7.92 ∆E min: 2.16 - max: 14.05 ∆E

配件和保修：带不带充电器？

我们的测试设备配有充电器，因为我们是从国外收到的。不过，欧盟国家的买家就别指望了。包装内还包括一个保护套、充电线和 SIM 卡工具。

小米提供 12 个月的保修.

输入设备和操作：精确的指纹传感器

120 Hz 的屏幕可对输入做出快速反应，高达 2,560 Hz 的触摸采样率使触摸屏非常精确。因此，输入通常不会出现延迟。

指纹传感器位于屏幕后方，位置非常靠近边缘，即使手小的人也能轻松触及。它几乎可以立即、非常可靠地解锁手机。

人脸识别也可以实现。不过，由于没有通过前置摄像头安装额外的传感器，因此可靠性不高。不过，在我们的测试中，它也能完美地工作。

显示屏：明亮，但有 PWM

由于边框略窄，屏幕也比上一代产品略大。分辨率也略高，达到 2,772 x 1,280 像素，以弥补这一不足。

在日常使用中，屏幕亮度与前代产品差不多，最高亮度可达 1,155 cd/m²。不过，小米再次提高了 HDR 模式下的亮度，现在该模式下的亮度可达 3,000cd/m²。

不过，这次的色彩准确度就没那么好了。在原始的 "专业色彩 "模式下，有轻微的偏蓝现象。尤其是蓝色色调与最佳色调略有偏差。


1134 cd/m²	1139 cd/m²	1149 cd/m²
1125 cd/m²	1155 cd/m²	1136 cd/m²
1137 cd/m²	1129 cd/m²	1122 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1155 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1136.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1155 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.42 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.246
CCT: 7263 K

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Motorola Edge 60 Neo pOLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"	OnePlus Nord CE 5 AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Screen		28%	22%	29%	20%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1155	1138 -1%	1132 -2%	1315 14%	1127 -2%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1136	1137 0%	1114 -2%	1300 14%	1137 0%
Brightness Distribution (%)	97	97 0%	98 1%	97 0%	98 1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.42	1.1 55%	1.55 36%	1.22 50%	1.8 26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.63	2.6 54%	3.28 42%	2.7 52%	2.8 50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.7	1.6 57%	1.5 59%	2 46%	2.1 43%
Gamma	2.246 ^98%	2.23 ^99%	2.107 ^104%	2.258 ^97%	2.11 ^104%
CCT	7263 ^89%	6284 ^103%	6473 ^100%	6503 ^100%	6466 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1953 cd/m²
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1877 cd/m² -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1140 cd/m² -42%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2922 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2510 cd/m² -14%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2012 cd/m² -31%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120.5 Hz
Amplitude: 16 %

The display backlight flickers at 120.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8042 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

我们检测到的 PWM 闪烁频率约为帧频，即 120 Hz 左右。不过，小米承诺也可以实现高达 3,840 Hz 的 PWM。

不过，我们建议敏感人群在购买前对屏幕进行全面测试。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6 ms rise
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7 ms rise
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms).

由于亮度高，红米手机在户外也能很好地使用。

可视角度没有问题。即使在平面角度下，也能很清楚地看到屏幕内容。

性能：轻微减速

小米采用联发科 Dimensity 7400-UltraRedmi Note 15 Pro 5G 中使用了联发科 Dimensity 7400-Ultra SoC。该芯片与 Dimensity 7400 或 7400X在性能方面。

这意味着，与 14 Pro 5G 相比，性能更新幅度很小。 Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G的性能相比只有很小的提升。

在日常使用中，性能通常足以防止卡顿。不过，对于更复杂的应用程序来说，性能储备就不是那么好了。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=207, last 2 years)	1779 Points +69%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1325 Points +26%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1099 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1050 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	1050 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1043 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	1033 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=207, last 2 years)	5199 Points +77%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4201 Points +43%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	3087 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	2955 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2939 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	2939 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2891 Points -2%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=144, last 2 years)	1493814 Points +115%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	730590 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	693873 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	693873 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	631545 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	617456 Points -11%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	17465 Points +28%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=180, last 2 years)	14872 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	13662 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	13662 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	13421 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	12811 Points -6%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2722, n=117, last 2 years)	1170 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	877 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	709 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=144, last 2 years)	7772 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	5002 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	5002 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	4983 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	4532 Points -9%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=144, last 2 years)	11565 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	10865 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	10865 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	10784 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	8445 Points -22%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=144, last 2 years)	8856 Points +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	4953 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	4953 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	4768 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	4632 Points -6%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=144, last 2 years)	26432 Points +204%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8704 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	8704 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8632 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	8011 Points -8%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2587, n=144, last 2 years)	1708 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	1452 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1402 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	1402 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1387 Points -1%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	27865 Points +236%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=128, last 2 years)	19732 Points +138%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8301 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	8301 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	8253 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	8087 Points -3%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=114, last 2 years)	23501 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1392 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	587 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1112 Points +95%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=69, last 2 years)	746 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	571 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	571 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	569 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4496 Points +238%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=69, last 2 years)	3045 Points +129%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1329 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	1329 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	1311 Points -1%
Quantized NPU 1.5
OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4547 Points +72%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=69, last 2 years)	4474 Points +69%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2689 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	2645 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	2645 Points 0%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=80, last 2 years)	5363 Points +893%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	540 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	540 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 6144	299 Points -45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192	232 Points -57%

Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 在图形处理能力方面也只达到了标准值。该 OnePlus Nord CE5表明，在这一价格范围内，可以实现更高的图形处理性能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2795 Points +176%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1033 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1012 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	901 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	883 Points -13%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2774 Points +175%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1054 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1010 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	907 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	871 Points -14%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9956 Points
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3708 Points
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3502 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3167 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	417 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	404 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	361 Points -11%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	411 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	405 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	372 Points -8%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps +20%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	90 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	86 fps -4%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	131 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	126 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	117 fps -4%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	83 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps -14%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps +21%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -10%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps -4%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +147%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps +21%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps -5%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps +188%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps -6%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +123%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +26%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -6%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +168%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps -7%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +184%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.7 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.1 fps -4%

Redmi Note 15 Pro 的上网效果不错，即使是比较复杂的网站也能顺利访问。

加载时间一般，偶尔需要等待一下图片。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=142, last 2 years)	157.2 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	131.654 Points +17%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 (Chrome 141)	122.3 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	112.7 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	112.67 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	85.453 Points -24%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=114, last 2 years)	233 runs/min +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	123 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	123 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	105 runs/min -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	77.4 runs/min -37%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=122, last 2 years)	14.8 runs/min +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	7.49 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	7.49 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	6.94 runs/min -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	6.56 runs/min -12%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=139, last 2 years)	147.8 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	127 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)	118 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	112 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	112 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	96 Points -14%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=190, last 2 years)	49530 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	38676 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	38676 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	38099 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)	35354 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	28945 Points -25%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Chrome 133)	1351.21 ms * -26%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=150, last 2 years)	1156 ms * -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra (n=1)	1073 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G (Chrome 144)	1072.9 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G (Chrome 135)	1031.23 ms * +4%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo (Chrome 141)	1021.8 ms * +5%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 2.2 存储器虽然没有打破任何速度记录，但在同类产品中也是不错的选择。数据传输通常足够快，加载时间也不会太长。

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G	OnePlus Nord CE 5	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		6%	10%	-33%	-5%	81%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	945	1009.67 7%	1235 31%	968.34 2%	909 ?(482 - 1041, n=58) -4%	2199 ?(270 - 4370, n=192, last 2 years) 133%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	837.4	833.64 0%	795 -5%	166.77 -80%	733 ?(369 - 998, n=58) -12%	1879 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=192, last 2 years) 124%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	184	248.81 35%	222 21%	233.98 27%	224 ?(99.7 - 295, n=58) 22%	296 ?(47.6 - 576, n=192, last 2 years) 61%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	326.1	266.92 -18%	302 -7%	62.58 -81%	247 ?(99.2 - 390, n=58) -24%	346 ?(9.4 - 987, n=192, last 2 years) 6%

游戏：最高可达 60 fps

在Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 上玩高帧率游戏通常只是一个梦想。我们测试的游戏都将帧速率限制在 60 fps。例如，在《使命召唤 Mobile》等游戏中也能稳定地达到这一帧率。

不过，要求更高的Genshin Impact或PUBG Mobile在高细节设置下只能以 40-50 帧/秒的速度运行。对于休闲游戏玩家来说，这可能已经足够，但对于要求更高的玩家来说，就得另寻他处了。

我们使用GameBench软件测试帧率。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Call of Duty Mobile; low: Ø59.4 (39-61)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Call of Duty Mobile; very high: Ø59.9 (58-61)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø51.1 (40-60)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø38.6 (25-46)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø58.1 (36-61)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39 (18-41)

排放：几乎没有节流

温度

在长时间负载的情况下，外壳的最大温升为 40.7 °C。用手触摸可以明显感觉到，但问题不大。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，我们检查了性能是否始终可用，没有出现节流现象。我们发现，即使多次重复基准测试，帧速率仍然非常接近。

Max. Load

Idle


37.6 °C	37.6 °C	37.3 °C
38.8 °C	38.4 °C	38 °C
38.7 °C	38.6 °C	37.2 °C

Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 38 °C


37.6 °C	37.3 °C	40.7 °C
37 °C	38.6 °C	38.9 °C
38 °C	39.6 °C	39.4 °C

Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 38.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 %
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.3 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.6 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 5 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97.1 % -3%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 60 Neo Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.1 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400-Ultra, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.4 % -1%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø6.01 (6-6.03)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø3.01 (2.99-3.02)

发言人

小米Redmi Note 15 5G 的扬声器位于底部边缘，听筒也有支持，听筒外壳上部边缘也有格栅，可实现稍宽的立体声效果。

扬声器的音量相当大，声音整体均衡，但在中频高音部分略有低沉。这可能会导致过度强调极高频率，从而在高音量时产生令人不悦的声音。

如果想避免这种情况，可以通过 USB 端口或蓝牙连接外置扬声器或耳机。有多种编解码器可用于无线传输和高保真音质。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间一款持久耐用的中端手机

能源消耗

Dimensity 7400-Ultra SoC 最初比许多其他同类智能手机更耗电，但在高负载情况下，其功耗相对较低，最大仅为 7.4 W。

该手机的最大充电功率为 45 瓦，但不能进行无线充电。

欧洲地区不提供充电器，但在我们的测试实验室中，该手机可以顺利使用所有电源适配器。充满电大约需要 1:30 小时。

其他设备可通过有线反向充电提供高达 22.5 W 的电量。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.5 / 1.9 Watt
Load	4 / 7.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh	Motorola Edge 60 Neo 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		6%	-1%	-13%	0%	-14%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.2	1.17 2%	0.8 33%	0.86 28%	1.2 ?(n=1) -0%	0.855 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=163, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.5	1.38 8%	1.2 20%	1.75 -17%	1.5 ?(n=1) -0%	1.439 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=163, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.9	1.41 26%	1.7 11%	1.82 4%	1.9 ?(n=1) -0%	1.619 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=163, last 2 years) 15%
Load Average * (Watt)	4	3.58 10%	5.4 -35%	5.31 -33%	4 ?(n=1) -0%	6.75 ?(2.3 - 15.4, n=135, last 2 years) -69%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	7.4	8.44 -14%	10.1 -36%	10.95 -48%	7.4 ?(n=1) -0%	11.1 ?(3.53 - 22, n=135, last 2 years) -50%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.42 (1.489-7.14)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.323 (1.173-1.86)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.98 (4.04-5.46)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.323 (1.173-1.86)

电池寿命

小米配备了比以前更强劲的电池，Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 现在配备了 6580 毫安时电池。

这意味着在实际使用中可以获得良好的电池续航能力。在我们以 150 尼特进行的 WLAN 上网测试中，这款手机的续航时间超过了 30 小时。这意味着手机在不充电的情况下可以正常使用两天。如果您很少使用手机，可以等待更长时间再充电。

在高负荷的情况下，例如玩游戏时，你仍然可以获得 5:11 小时的运行时间，这是一个不错的数值。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		39h 10min
WiFi Websurfing		30h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		31h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 11min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G 5110 mAh	Motorola Edge 60 Neo 5000 mAh	OnePlus Nord CE 5 5200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 5000 mAh
Battery runtime		-28%	-20%	-45%	-26%
Reader / Idle (h)	39.2	29.2 -26%			33.4 -15%
H.264 (h)	31.7	23.7 -25%			24.3 -23%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	30.5	20.1 -34%	24.4 -20%	16.9 -45%	14.8 -51%
Load (h)	5.2	3.9 -25%			4.5 -13%

Notebookcheck 对小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 的总体印象

由于电池续航时间长、屏幕亮度高、主摄像头效果好，小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 在中端智能手机领域保持了领先地位。

不过，如果性能再提高一些，该设备就会更加突出。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G - 01/25/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

43 / 69 → 62%

Weight

88%

Battery

96%

Display

91%

Games Performance

16 / 55 → 29%

Application Performance

60 / 85 → 70%

AI Performance

57%

Temperature

90%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

65%

Average

65%

78%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
5%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
95.7%

Repairability
56%

Software Updates
83.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 48.3%

潜在替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 77.6%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: $424.99 List Price: 400€	210 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED
2. 77.8%	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $372.00 XIAOMI Redmi Note 14 Pro+ Pl... 2. $309.99 Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G ... 3. $11.99 Ibywind Screen Protector For... List Price: 400€	190 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED
3. 79.5%	Motorola Edge 60 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7400X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $8.88 Silsewip [2pcs] Hydrogel Scr... 2. $9.68 Lyepetik [2 Pack] Hydrogel S... 3. $11.99 MiKoyi for Motorola Edge 60 ... List Price: 399€	175 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.36" 2670x1200 460 PPI pOLED
4. 80.8%	OnePlus Nord CE 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB	Amazon: $589.00 List Price: 349€	199 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.77" 2392x1080 388 PPI AMOLED
5. 78%	Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $375.00 Samsung Galaxy A36 5G A Seri... 2. $259.50 Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 2025 \|... 3. $266.99 Samsung Galaxy A36 5G Ai (fo... List Price: 379€	195 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 智能手机评测：近乎无边框的中端手机，IP68 防护等级和 30 小时电池续航时间

转变边界。

小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 的评价

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

构建：非常稳健，变化清晰

尺寸比较

硬件：400 欧元可买很多东西

软件：长达 6 年的更新

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统：精确定位

电话功能和语音质量：部分消音

摄像头：200 万像素Redmi Note

配件和保修：带不带充电器？

输入设备和操作：精确的指纹传感器

显示屏：明亮，但有 PWM

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能：轻微减速

游戏：最高可达 60 fps

排放：几乎没有节流

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A36 5G audio analysis

电池续航时间一款持久耐用的中端手机

能源消耗

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 对小米Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 的总体印象

潜在替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency