关于摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Fusion 的结论
顾名思义，摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Fusion 的目标是用一款设备吸引众多不同的目标群体，而它也很好地做到了这一点。
这款手机机身纤薄，但功能却比同价位产品更强大。它有多种颜色可供选择，用户可以根据自己的喜好来决定是采用紫色等非常醒目的颜色，还是采用更低调的颜色。
大容量电池可实现长时间运行。同时，如果需要，显示屏可以变得非常明亮，并能充分显示 HDR 内容。
Wi-Fi 传输速率可能会更好，尤其是偶尔会出现掉线的情况。对于一款中端智能手机来说，五年的安全更新是可以接受的，但仍未达到欧盟的要求。屏幕需要面对 PWM 闪烁的问题，扬声器也可以更强劲一些。
总的来说，摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Fusion 是一款非常吸引人的智能手机，价格也不贵，仍将是许多用户的日常好伴侣。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
- $472.49Motorola Moto Edge 70 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB+12GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.67" Curved XT2601-3 Latino American Version (Bronze Green)
- $499.99Motorola Moto Edge 70 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB+12GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.67" Curved XT2601-3 Latino American Version (Gadget Gray)
- $343.48Motorola Edge 2025 | Unlocked | Made for US 8/256GB | 50MP Camera | Pantone Deep Forest
规格
建筑和功能：非常理想的设计
过去，Edge 系列一直代表着高品质的外观和圆润的屏幕边缘，而摩托罗拉今年则选择了特别纤薄的设计。摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Fusion 厚度仅为 6.8 毫米（不含摄像头模块），重量仅为 193 克，在同价位手机中不算太轻。
我们的测试机型配备了 7000 毫安时电池。根据要求，Edge 70 Fusion 还可配备 5200 毫安时电池，如果不需要超长的运行时间，可节省约 20 欧元，重量甚至轻了 16 克。
由于采用了特殊的背面材料，这款手机手感良好，具有高品质的手感。有四种 Pantone 颜色可供选择：深蓝色、略带灰色的浅蓝色、蓝绿色和紫色。Edge 70 Fusion 的防尘防水性能符合 IP68/IP69 标准。
没有音频接口，USB 端口仅支持 USB 2.0 标准。
通信和操作：入侵无线局域网
Wi-Fi 6 是 Edge 70 Fusion 上最快的 Wi-Fi 协议。这使手机的下载速度超过 500 Mbps，但整体网络性能有时不稳定，数据传输速率可能会下降。
Edge 70 Fusion 的许多频率都可用于移动通信，因此在国外旅行时也可以使用手机进行移动上网。在我们的测试中，接收效果还算不错，但往往赶不上高端智能手机。
手机屏幕下方集成了一个指纹传感器。它能可靠地解锁手机，但有短暂的延迟。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
软件与可持续性：五年的安全更新
Android 16 预装的安全补丁是从 2026 年 1 月开始的，因此在测试时有些过时。可能每三个月更新一次。
制造商承诺在 2031 年前会有三次操作系统功能升级和安全补丁。
包装为无塑料包装，但除此之外没有关于二氧化碳排放量或可回收材料的信息。
摄像头全新 Lytia 710 摄像头传感器
主摄像头采用索尼 Lytia 710 传感器。它具有 5000 万像素的分辨率和光学防抖（OIS）功能。在黄色或红色等难以辨认的颜色中，细节可能会丢失，但图像总体上清晰，细节也很丰富。暗光下的清晰度也不错。
另外还有一个 1300 万像素广角摄像头。它能拍摄光线充足的照片，但细节难以辨认。
前置摄像头可拍摄清晰的自拍照，但也需要良好的环境光线。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera: PlantMain camera: SurroundingsMain camera: Low lightWide-angle camera
显示屏Edge 70 Fusion 的高品质屏幕
摩托罗拉希望通过明亮的 OLED 屏幕为自己加分，而它做得非常成功。Edge 70 Fusion 的显示屏在日常使用时高达 1,500 cd/m²，在小区域或 HDR 内容时甚至可以达到更高的数值，而且色彩还原性非常好，户外适用性也不错，确实令人印象深刻。
不过，在 120 Hz 时会出现 PWM 闪烁，因此敏感人士在购买前应先试用屏幕。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1501 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.52 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
103.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.184
CCT: 6444 K
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | Motorola Edge 60 Fusion P-OLED, 2712x1200, 6.7" | Realme 14 Pro+ OLED, 2800x1272, 6.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Honor Magic8 Lite OLED, 2640x1200, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -0% | 6% | -35% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1501 | 1281 -15% | 1169 -22% | 1155 -23% | 1754 17% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1476 | 1281 -13% | 1148 -22% | 1136 -23% | 1748 18% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 94 -2% | 94 -2% | 97 1% | 98 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.52 | 1.47 3% | 1.17 23% | 2.42 -59% | 1.5 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.47 | 3.14 10% | 2.38 31% | 5.63 -62% | 3.5 -1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 2.2 15% | 1.9 27% | 3.7 -42% | 2.4 8% |
| Gamma | 2.184 101% | 2.062 107% | 2.249 98% | 2.246 98% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6444 101% | 6628 98% | 6732 97% | 7263 89% | 6358 102% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 16 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7920 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命动力充足，续航时间长
高通 高通骁龙 7s 第三代处理器目前，这款手机的机龄可能已超过两年，但在中端机型中，它仍能提供不错的性能表现。一般情况下都能流畅运行，大多数应用程序都能流畅运行。
UFS 3.1 内存速度非常快，因此数据传输也很快。
长时间使用后，外壳会明显发热，但一般不会出现问题。根据 3DMark 压力测试，不能完全排除轻微的节流现象。
底部边缘的小型扬声器由听筒提供支持，但两者的音量并不算大。你几乎听不到任何低音，但其余的声音频谱很均衡，不会过载。
它支持多种蓝牙音频编解码器，因此也能顺利无线连接外部音频设备。
在我们的 WLAN 测试中，7,000 毫安时大电池的运行时间超过 24 小时。这应该可以轻松满足两天的日常使用需求。手机充电速度高达 68 W，但不包括充电器。
在实验室中使用我们的充电器，Edge 70 Fusion 从 0% 开始充电大约需要 45 分钟。
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | Realme 14 Pro+ | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | Honor Magic8 Lite | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -41% | -3% | -46% | -4% | -24% | -7% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2049.4 | 967.4 -53% | 2002 -2% | 945 -54% | 1948.54 -5% | 1761 ? -14% | 2162 ? 5% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1825.9 | 908.8 -50% | 1760 -4% | 837.4 -54% | 1828.13 0% | 1208 ? -34% | 1858 ? 2% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 351.2 | 272.1 -23% | 366 4% | 184 -48% | 344.19 -2% | 287 ? -18% | 298 ? -15% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 452.1 | 286.9 -37% | 411 -9% | 326.1 -28% | 412.87 -9% | 321 ? -29% | 357 ? -21% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Edge 60 Fusion | |
| Honor Magic8 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G | |
| Realme 14 Pro+ | |
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (25.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Motorola Edge 70 Fusion 7000 mAh | Motorola Edge 60 Fusion 5200 mAh | Realme 14 Pro+ 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G 6580 mAh | Honor Magic8 Lite 7500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -15% | -22% | 7% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 39.3 | 32.8 -17% | 39.2 0% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 24.5 | 17.1 -30% | 19.2 -22% | 30.5 24% | 23 -6% |
| Load (h) | 5.4 | 5.5 2% | 5.2 -4% | ||
| H.264 (h) | 19.4 | 31.7 |
Notebookcheck 对摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Fusion 的总体印象
摩托罗拉 Edge 70 Fusion 的目标是将多种品质融为一体，并在很大程度上取得了成功。有两个版本的电池大小不同，购买时应注意这一点。
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
- 04/02/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 77.4%  | Motorola Edge 70 Fusion Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: List Price: 420€ | 193 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
2. 77.1%  | Motorola Edge 60 Fusion MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: List Price: 329€ | 178 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1200 445 PPI P-OLED |
3. 77.8%  | Realme 14 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: List Price: 499€ | 194 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.83" 2800x1272 450 PPI OLED |
4. 77.6%  | Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7400-Ultra ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: List Price: 400€ | 210 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
5. 78%  | Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB | List Price: 400€ | 189 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.79" 2640x1200 427 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
