三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra 评测--配备 120 Hz OLED 和 RTX 4050 的多媒体笔记本电脑

Name: Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra
Brand: Samsung

三星对 MacBook Pro 16 的回应。 16 英寸Galaxy Book4 Ultra 多媒体笔记本电脑是三星对Apple MacBook Pro 16 的回应。除了 120 Hz 高分辨率 AMOLED 面板外，它还配备了当前的酷睿 Ultra 处理器以及GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑。不过，Ultra 的价格并不便宜。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/18/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AI Geforce Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Thunderbolt Touchscreen Windows

三星将其Galaxy Book 系列更新至第四代，并推出Galaxy Book 4 Ultra，欲与Apple 的 MacBook Pro 16 直接竞争。与前一年的机型相比，这款产品变化不大，只有酷睿 i7-13700H 被流星湖酷睿 Ultra 7 155H 芯片取代。

价格方面也没有什么变化，基本型号及其酷睿至尊 7 155H 和GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑的价格为 2399 美元。这仍然是一个非常雄心勃勃的价格，尤其是考虑到微薄的存储规格（16 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘）。如果你花 2999 美元，就能买到配备了 Core Ultra 9 185H和 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑以及更多内存和存储空间（32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD）。

Test device courtesy of Samsung Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra (Galaxy Book4 Series)

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 2055 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 80 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 551.61, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5-6400, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 212 PPI, capacitive, ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB

, 403 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17 x 355 x 250

Battery

76 Wh, 4900 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Quad speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 140W USB-C PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.823 kg, Power Supply: 351 g

Price

2799 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
90.4 %	03/2024	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	17 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
88.6 %	12/2023	Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	1.8 kg	15.8 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
93.7 %	11/2023	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	2.1 kg	16.9 mm	16.20"	3456x2234
88 %	08/2023	Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	18.2 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
91.1 %	03/2024	HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2 kg	19.8 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
88.6 %	07/2023	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.6 kg	17.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.4 %	04/2023	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	16.5 mm	16.00"	2880x1800

保护套 -Galaxy Book 配有金属保护套

外壳设计与旧款相比没有变化旧型号.深灰色的铝制外壳（月光石灰）非常高档，表面不仅反馈舒适，而且对指纹不敏感，易于清洁。不过，屏幕下边框较厚（1.7 厘米），有些影响整体外观。

Galaxy Book4 Ultra 在制造质量和稳定性方面都给人留下了良好的印象。键盘区域仅有轻微松动，整个底座具有抗扭转性。除此之外，没有任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。显示屏盖本身要薄得多，同样也非常稳定。铰链调整得很好，基本能防止任何晃动，单手也能轻松打开盖子。最大开启角度为 135 度。

从设备的厚度来看，Book4 Ultra 的屏幕边框也很厚，与同类产品相比占用空间最大。评测设备的高度为 16.5 毫米，重量为 1.82 千克，在同类产品中处于中等水平。随机附带的 140 瓦 PSU 又增加了 351 克的重量。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 DIN A4 ❌

功能 - 雷电 4 和 HDMI 2.1

除了包括 Thunderbolt 4 在内的现代 USB-C 接口外，Galaxy Book4 Ultra 还提供一个普通 USB-A 端口和 HDMI 2.1。不过，其中一个 USB 接口还可用于供电。设备后部两侧的端口位置无可挑剔。HDMI 接口可直接连接到 Nvidia GPU，但两个 USB-C 接口均无法连接。使用外接显示器时，dGPU 并不总是自动同时运行。

左：HDMI 2.1、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）

SD 读卡器

在我们的测试中，右侧的 microSD 读卡器与我们的参考卡 Angelbird AV Pro V60 配对后的平均速度为 80 到 90 MB/s。不过，读卡器本身存在问题（弹簧装置），因为连接点位于机壳内部很深的位置，因此在没有工具/辅助工具的帮助下很难轻松安装或取出卡。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	144.2 MB/s +83%
Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)	93.3 MB/s +18%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	78.8 MB/s
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB)	78.1 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	74 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	23.3 MB/s -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	237.2 MB/s +172%
Average of class Multimedia (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years)	122.6 MB/s +41%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	87.2 MB/s
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H (PNY EliteX-Pro60 V60 256 GB)	85.4 MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	83 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	26.1 MB/s -70%

交流

三星使用了我们熟悉的英特尔 AX211 模块，该模块支持 6 GHz 网络中的 Wi-Fi 6E 标准以及蓝牙 5.3。与华硕参考路由器配合使用，传输速度非常好且稳定。尽管如此，新的Galaxy Book4 Ultra 并不支持 Wi-Fi 7。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1625 (min: 1476) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1715 (min: 1675) MBit/s ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1326 (min: 1246) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1439 (min: 1253) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1041 (min: 952) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1387 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1300 (min: 942) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1284 (min: 1139) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1436 (min: 1342) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1381 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1630 (min: 1571) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1687 (min: 1665) MBit/s ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1493 (min: 1452) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1638 (min: 1438) MBit/s ∼93%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1726 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1752 (min: 1702) MBit/s ∼100%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1172 (min: 756) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1429 (min: 1235) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1227 (min: 1085) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1320 (min: 1256) MBit/s ∼95%

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1625 (1476-1697)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1715 (1675-1731)

网络摄像头

1080p 网络摄像头没有任何变化，质量仍然一般。该设备缺少机械快门和用于人脸识别的红外模块。得益于 Meteor Lake 芯片的全新 NPU，网络摄像头的 Studio Effects（背景虚化、眼神接触、头部跟踪）可直接从操作系统中获得支持，无论使用何种应用程序。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra: 6.85 ∆E min: 3.37 - max: 10.03 ∆E

维护

在设备的底座上，四颗螺丝隐藏在橡胶脚垫下。不过，即使没有螺丝，底盖也会被牢牢固定，因为中间还有额外的固定夹。在设备内部，你会看到风扇和大型蒸发腔。有两个用于 M.2 2280 固态硬盘的插槽，虽然旋入式电池可以更换，但所有其他组件都是焊接的。

输入设备 - 超大触摸板，普通键盘

三星为Galaxy Book4 Ultra 配备了键盘和数字键盘。由于键程太浅，打字体验略有欠缺，而且按键时还会发出声音，与普通的Galaxy Book4 Pro 相比，敲击也不那么精确。在这方面，三星笔记本电脑也落后于竞争对手。经常打字的人应该先试试键盘。位于右上方的电源按钮同时也是指纹传感器。白色背光有三个强度级别，可以自动激活。

在巨大的触控板（15.1 x 10.8 厘米）上做出的轻扫手势非常好，尽管触控板的位置偏左。在打字时，左手的球几乎总是在触摸板上，但在测试过程中这并没有成为问题。触摸板的下部可以点击，但这样做的代价是发出相对响亮和廉价的噪音。

显示屏 - 120 Hz AMOLED

三星只销售配备 16 英寸 OLED 触摸屏（2880 x 1800 像素，16:10）的Galaxy Book4 Ultra。主观画质色彩鲜艳、黑色深邃，给人留下深刻印象。响应速度极快，支持 HDR 内容。此外，由于采用了 120 Hz 的刷新率，移动非常流畅。与所有 Windows 设备一样，HDR 模式可以手动激活，但不再提供色彩管理功能。亮度和色温均可通过传感器自动调节。

SDR 模式的最大亮度平均为 393 cd/m²，黑色值为 0 cd/m²，对比度非常高。我们测得图像部分的 HDR 亮度为 564 cd/m²，而几乎全白图像的 HDR 亮度为 540 cd/m²。这意味着，与微型 LED 面板相比，HDR 功能明显受到限制，再加上更好的 macOS 处理能力，MacBook Pro 1600 的 HDR 功能将更加出色。 MacBook Pro 16在 HDR 方面要优越得多。


394 cd/m²	393 cd/m²	397 cd/m²
388 cd/m²	390 cd/m²	395 cd/m²
391 cd/m²	393 cd/m²	397 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ATNA60CL07-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 397 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 393.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 389 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
88.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27

	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16.00	Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Samsung ATNA60YV04-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00	Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16.00	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.00	HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Samsung SDC41A6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16.00
Display		3%	-3%	-17%	3%	1%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	98.6	99.7 1%	95.1 -4%	68.8 -30%	99.9 1%	99.2 1%	99.6 1%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	100 0%	99.9 0%	98.8 -1%	100 0%		100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	88.5	96.7 9%	84.6 -4%	70 -21%	96.3 9%		96.7 9%
Response Times		-164%	-472%	-1756%	5%	-4136%	10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.54 ?(0.29, 0.25)	1.86 ?(0.96, 0.9) -244%	14 ?(7.4, 6.6) -2493%	13.7 ?(6.7, 7) -2437%	0.49 ?(0.26, 0.23) 9%	66.9 ?(29.4, 37.5) -12289%	0.78 ?(0.44, 0.34) -44%
Response Time Black / White *	0.69 ?(0.39, 0.3)	1.89 ?(0.89, 1) -174%	9.2 ?(2.2, 7) -1233%	8.1 ?(3.8, 4.3) -1074%	0.65 ?(0.37, 0.28) 6%	43.6 ?(13.6, 30) -6219%	0.86 ?(0.4, 0.46) -25%
PWM Frequency	240 ?(100)	60 ?(100) -75%	5784 ?(100) 2310%		240 ?(100) 0%	14877 6099%	480 ?(100) 100%
Screen		-4%	-117%	-77%	-25%	22%	-16%
Brightness middle	390	390.1 0%	627.4 61%	384 -2%	400 3%	630 62%	385.2 -1%
Brightness	393	393 0%	618 57%	371 -6%	399 2%	604 54%	387 -2%
Brightness Distribution	98	97 -1%	95 -3%	88 -10%	93 -5%	94 -4%	99 1%
Black Level *			0.19	0.3	0.03
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.4	1.41 -1%	5.84 -317%	3.4 -143%	2.3 -64%	1.2 14%	1.73 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	3.43 -27%	10.22 -279%	9.2 -241%	4.15 -54%	2.8 -4%	3.95 -46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	2 5%	6.7 -219%	3.4 -62%	2.7 -29%	1.9 10%	2.6 -24%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.77 ^79%	2.16 ^102%	2.266 ^97%	2.29 ^96%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	6431 ^101%	6324 ^103%	5795 ^112%	7462 ^87%	7047 ^92%	6812 ^95%	6133 ^106%
Contrast			3302	1280	13333
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *			4.45	1.3	1.66
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-55% / -42%	-197% / -177%	-617% / -366%	-6% / -10%	-1371% / -1228%	-1% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

在三星的设置应用中，有多种色彩配置文件，标准的活动配置文件是 "鲜艳"。像往常一样，这里的色彩有点过度饱和，这让图像显得更加鲜艳。不过，开箱即用的 P3 模式也能提供大部分准确的色彩，我们就是使用这种模式进行测量的。通过自己的校准，我们无法进一步改善这一性能。该面板完全覆盖了 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间，喜欢编辑图像的人会对同样精确的 sRGB 模式感到满意。

CalMAN ColorChecker（模式：sRGB，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.39 ms rise
0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.29 ms rise
0.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.25 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

OLED 触摸屏基本上是反光的，但由于采用了康宁大猩猩玻璃 DX，其反光程度低于其他光面面板，在这方面，三星与Apple 的 MacBook 不相上下。原则上，只要避免光源的反射，你也可以在明亮的户外使用该设备。可视角度的稳定性非常好，但如果偏差较大，你会发现典型的 OLED 蓝色光泽。

性能 - 流星湖取代猛禽湖

三星用新的流星湖处理器取代了旧的英特尔猛禽湖芯片，您可以获得酷睿至尊 7 155H或酷睿至尊 9 185H.无论采用哪种处理器，您都将获得 16 或 32 GB 的焊接内存，在 GPU 方面，您可以选择 GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑或速度更快的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑.

测试条件

在三星设置应用中，有多种能源配置文件，但标准选择是 "优化"模式。我们也使用该模式进行了以下基准测试和测量。您还可以选择静音模式或高性能模式。我们在下表中总结了相应的 TDP/TGP 值。

能源概况	CPU TDP	R23 Multi	GPU TGP	Time Spy 图形	压力测试	赛博朋克 2077 1080p Ultra	最大风扇强度
静音	35/25 瓦	11,327 点	55 瓦	1,529 点	CPU：20 瓦 GPU：20 瓦	12fps	32 dB(A)
优化后	65/40 瓦	15,342 分	55 瓦	6,073 分	CPU：25 瓦 GPU：33 瓦	39.4fps	41.7 dB(A)
高性能	80/70 瓦	17,088 分	80 瓦	7,849 分	CPU：30 瓦 GPU：80 瓦	55.4fps	51.3 dB(A)

处理器

酷睿至尊 7 155H Core Ultra 7 155H的继任者酷睿 i7-13700H的继任者，总共提供 16 个内核/22 个线程（6 倍性能，10 倍效率）。该处理器的功耗限制为 65/40 瓦，即使与老一代 Raptor Lake 处理器相比几乎没有任何差异，也能提供不错的性能。这意味着它并不值得升级。使用 Ryzen 9 Pro 7940HS，AMD 稍稍领先。普通的 M3 Pro也处于这一水平，在单核测试中占据优势。在持续负载下，多核性能下降了约 15%。在电池模式下，处理器的最大功耗为 45 瓦，因此性能下降了 7%。其他 CPU 基准测试可在技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2195 (2134.59-2575.83)

Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS: Ø2620 (2534.21-2717.95)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core: Ø2163 (2149.84-2169.2)

Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H: Ø2742 (2611.14-2856.94)

SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2126 (2076.41-2253.14)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1739 (1422.32-2515.18)

HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1705 (1414.83-2302.95)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 ^-2! Intel Core i9-13905H	82.6 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro ^-8! Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	81.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	75.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	70.4 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) ^-2! Intel Core i7-13700H	69.4 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	69 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	67.4 pt
Average of class Multimedia	66.1 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 ^-2! Intel Core i7-13700H	65.8 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	20034 (17303.9^min - 20033.7^max) Points +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	16938 (16164.3^min - 16938.4^max) Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15698 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	15306 Points -2%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	15154 (13865.9^min - 15153.6^max) Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	15106 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=27)	14776 Points -6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	14760 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)	14189 Points -10%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	2020 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	1977 Points +11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	1885 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1794 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1789 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1801, n=27)	1725 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)	1713 Points -4%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1708 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	1698 Points -5%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	7469 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	6601 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6085 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	5926 Points -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=25)	5757 Points -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	5672 Points -7%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5609 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)	5352 Points -12%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	775 Points +12%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	729 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	695 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	693 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (620 - 693, n=25)	667 Points -4%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	663 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	657 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)	646 Points -7%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	2857 (2611.14^min - 2856.94^max) Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	2718 (2534.21^min - 2717.95^max) Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2576 (2134.59^min - 2575.83^max) Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	2515 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1988 - 2858, n=29)	2461 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)	2321 Points -10%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2303 (1414.83^min - 2302.95^max) Points -11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	2253 (2076.41^min - 2253.14^max) Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	2163 (2149.84^min, 2151.26^P1 - 2169.2^max) Points -16%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	285 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	280 Points +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	276 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	259 Points
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	255 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (230 - 268, n=26)	254 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)	251 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	246 Points -5%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	327 Seconds * -49%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)	265 Seconds * -20%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (178 - 349, n=23)	236 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	223 Seconds * -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	221 Seconds * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	220 Seconds *
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	191 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	173 Seconds * +21%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	76332 MIPS +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	67813 MIPS +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	62513 MIPS
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	61921 MIPS -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	60842 MIPS -3%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	60099 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (42601 - 70074, n=25)	58689 MIPS -6%
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)	57411 MIPS -8%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	6224 MIPS +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	6215 MIPS +12%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	6069 MIPS +10%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)	5639 MIPS +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5540 MIPS
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	5510 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5037 - 5540, n=25)	5348 MIPS -3%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5125 MIPS -7%

Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	15480 Points +24%
Average of class Multimedia (8656 - 21264, n=30, last 2 years)	13395 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	13028 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10696 - 13656, n=27)	12549 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12517 Points
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11962 Points -4%

Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	3138 Points +29%
Average of class Multimedia (2320 - 3157, n=30, last 2 years)	2633 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	2605 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2436 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (2287 - 2458, n=27)	2402 Points -1%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2288 Points -6%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	15298 Points +23%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	14999 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12463 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=27)	12179 Points -2%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12053 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	12038 Points -3%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	11808 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	11497 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)	11372 Points -9%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	2327 Points +28%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	1966 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	1956 Points +7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	1885 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1824 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1689 - 1824, n=27)	1762 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)	1758 Points -4%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1731 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	1692 Points -7%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	22.9 fps +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	20.4 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.1 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	16.8 fps -2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	16.6 fps -3%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16.4 fps -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=25)	16.4 fps -4%
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)	15.6 fps -9%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	49.6 s * -6%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)	48 s * -3%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	47.6 s * -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40.9 - 58.9, n=25)	47.6 s * -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	46.6 s *
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	46.1 s * +1%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	45.3 s * +3%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	42.8 s * +8%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4907 sec * -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.489 sec * -4%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)	0.4811 sec * -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4609 - 0.516, n=25)	0.4799 sec * -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4682 sec *
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	0.4514 sec * +4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	0.434 sec * +7%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H	0.4178 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2576 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

177.7 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

259 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	95.9 pt
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67.1 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66.4 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65.3 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	65.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	62.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	27411 KRay/s +102%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	17986 KRay/s +33%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	14049 KRay/s +4%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	13917 KRay/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	13541 KRay/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13486 KRay/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=25)	13154 KRay/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years)	12788 KRay/s -6%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	116960 Points +63%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	92135 Points +28%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	72948 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71791 Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70104 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69259 Points -4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (43630 - 93181, n=25)	69102 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years)	65480 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	4944 MB/s +52%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	4296 MB/s +32%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3360 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3251 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3247 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=25)	3215 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3200 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years)	3047 MB/s -6%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	124565 Points +48%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	117697 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	100136 Points +19%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	99961 Points +19%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years)	92085 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84280 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 93266, n=25)	84034 Points 0%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81755 Points -3%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	15304 Points +58%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	11328 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9696 Points
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9622 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10641, n=25)	9122 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9065 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years)	9055 Points -7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8982 Points -7%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	62357 Points +79%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	44667 Points +28%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	35607 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	34862 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	34531 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (21052 - 47685, n=25)	33830 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years)	33558 Points -4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	33488 Points -4%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	88705 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	86469 MB/s +27%
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years)	76070 MB/s +11%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=25)	75133 MB/s +10%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	68741 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	68288 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67264 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66616 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1234 MB/s +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	1079 MB/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	997 MB/s +3%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	996 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	968 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=25)	950 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	948 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years)	868 MB/s -10%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	14590 KRay/s +106%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	9873 KRay/s +39%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7496 KRay/s +6%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7241 KRay/s +2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7240 KRay/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7087 KRay/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=25)	6875 KRay/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years)	6829 KRay/s -4%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	52520 MPixel/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50926 MPixel/s
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48831 MPixel/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	48148 MPixel/s -5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=25)	46865 MPixel/s -8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44545 MPixel/s -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	37800 MPixel/s -26%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years)	36824 MPixel/s -28%

系统性能

在合成基准测试中，Galaxy Book4 Ultra 表现出色，是一款速度快、反应灵敏的电脑。在测试过程中，我们没有发现任何问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	7777 Points +12%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7674 Points +10%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7368 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6973 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6822 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (6537 - 6973, n=3)	6743 Points -3%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6720 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)	6602 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	11483 Points +10%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11320 Points +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10753 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10544 Points +1%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)	10473 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10446 Points
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10326 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10044 - 10446, n=3)	10272 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	10046 Points +10%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9710 Points +6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9511 Points +4%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9272 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9152 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8769 - 9272, n=3)	9064 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)	8709 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	8578 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11156 Points +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	11064 Points +15%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10691 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9624 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9527 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8602 - 9624, n=3)	8945 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)	8686 Points -10%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	8602 Points -11%

CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z	1977 Points +14%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1896 Points +9%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1774 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1740 Points
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years)	1701 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1574 - 1740, n=3)	1668 Points -4%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1574 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1569 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1555 Points -11%

CrossMark / Productivity
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1822 Points +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z	1782 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1659 Points
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1650 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years)	1622 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1496 - 1659, n=3)	1586 Points -4%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1496 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1488 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1479 Points -11%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z	2424 Points +26%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2082 Points +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2012 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1930 Points
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years)	1893 Points -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1831 - 1930, n=3)	1890 Points -2%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1831 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1714 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1691 Points -12%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1789 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1495 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1467 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z	1466 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years)	1462 Points 0%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1368 Points -7%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (1167 - 1467, n=3)	1336 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1325 Points -10%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1167 Points -20%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z	427 Points +52%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	336 Points +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	315 Points +12%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	301 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia (171.4 - 432, n=93, last 2 years)	295 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	281 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (278 - 281, n=3)	280 Points 0%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	278 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	237 Points -16%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	288 Points +12%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	274 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	258 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (255 - 258, n=3)	256 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	255 Points -1%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	255 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 348, n=70, last 2 years)	247 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	208 Points -19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	552 ms * -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	546 ms * -31%
Average of class Multimedia (363 - 1016, n=95, last 2 years)	542 ms * -30%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	537 ms * -29%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	494 ms * -19%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (416 - 537, n=3)	492 ms * -18%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	465 ms * -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	416.4 ms *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z	376.2 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		6973 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	90918 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 95631, n=25)	85966 MB/s -5%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84352 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79890 MB/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71912 MB/s -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	66740 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65071 MB/s -28%
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years)	61455 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	89474 MB/s
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	86873 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=25)	81502 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	73071 MB/s -18%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70707 MB/s -21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69534 MB/s -22%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years)	60555 MB/s -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	50398 MB/s -44%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	93451 MB/s +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	91516 MB/s +21%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	90954 MB/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	88988 MB/s +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	75813 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64852 - 93451, n=25)	74035 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67041 MB/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years)	63628 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (125.8 - 173, n=25)	143.5 ns * -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	141.4 ns *
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	138.4 ns * +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M	121.3 ns * +14%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103.9 ns * +27%
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years)	102.3 ns * +28%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	97.5 ns * +31%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.2 ns * +40%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，评测设备及其当前的 BIOS 版本表现非常出色。一个驱动程序确实出现了峰值，但重要的 "中断到处理延迟 "值非常低。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6156.4 μs * -932%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4545.9 μs * -662%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1428.9 μs * -140%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1253.5 μs * -110%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	893 μs * -50%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	596.3 μs *

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

不出所料，三星安装了自己的一款固态硬盘（PM9A1），但容量只有 512 GB。首次安装后，用户只能使用 403 GB。至少，由于有了第二个 M.2 2280 插槽，存储容量可以轻松、经济地扩展。固态硬盘的性能无可挑剔，即使在长时间负载的情况下，性能也不会下降。其他固态硬盘基准测试在此列出.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6862 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5123 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 613 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 77.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 164 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1679 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2248 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	95.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	77 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	70.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	66.8 pt
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	66.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia	56.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	55.9 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	53.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4195 (3890.22^min - 4194.51^max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4007 (3969.31^min - 4006.77^max) MB/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3712 (3688.85^min - 3711.75^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	3654 (3592.99^min - 3653.69^max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1472 - 4572, n=39)	3501 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3077 (2170.13^min - 3076.66^max) MB/s -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3005 (2951.71^min - 3004.87^max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Multimedia (756 - 4861, n=87, last 2 years)	2872 MB/s -23%
seq write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5155 (4427.3^min - 5155.43^max) MB/s +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4152 (3343.49^min - 4151.61^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	3877 (3771.73^min - 3876.79^max) MB/s -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3530 (3501.32^min - 3530^max) MB/s -15%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3327 (3035.64^min - 3327.13^max) MB/s -20%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1148 - 4434, n=39)	3289 MB/s -21%
Average of class Multimedia (790 - 5709, n=87, last 2 years)	2977 MB/s -28%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2569 (1593.04^min - 2568.7^max) MB/s -38%
seq q8 t1 read
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7152 (6200.23^min - 7151.67^max) MB/s +24%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7121 (6367.95^min - 7120.69^max) MB/s +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	7002 (6363.24^min - 7002.18^max) MB/s +22%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6601 (5818.24^min - 6601.01^max) MB/s +15%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6590 (5847.33^min - 6590.33^max) MB/s +14%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (3387 - 6793, n=39)	6077 MB/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5759 (4945.05^min - 5758.78^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (1023 - 7121, n=87, last 2 years)	5217 MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6761 (6735.84^min - 6761.33^max) MB/s +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	5602 (5479.75^min - 5601.7^max) MB/s +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5032 (4977.28^min - 5031.91^max) MB/s
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4938 (4923.07^min - 4938.16^max) MB/s -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4886 (4877.24^min - 4885.61^max) MB/s -3%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4542 (1615.35^min - 4542.01^max) MB/s -10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1146 - 5091, n=39)	4428 MB/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia (871 - 6761, n=87, last 2 years)	3947 MB/s -22%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	84.9 (82^min - 84.93^max) MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	83.7 (81.88^min - 83.66^max) MB/s +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	78.3 (76.54^min - 78.34^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (37.6 - 92.9, n=39)	71.9 MB/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 149.1, n=87, last 2 years)	64.5 MB/s -18%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	59.7 (57.49^min - 59.7^max) MB/s -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	57.1 (56.78^min - 57.07^max) MB/s -27%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	53.1 (52.47^min - 53.13^max) MB/s -32%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	267 (266.37^min - 267.43^max) MB/s +63%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	214 (213.09^min - 214.01^max) MB/s +30%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (125.7 - 241, n=39)	180.3 MB/s +10%
Average of class Multimedia (80.9 - 378, n=87, last 2 years)	178.7 MB/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	164.2 (156.89^min - 164.15^max) MB/s
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	153.1 (148.89^min - 153.11^max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	151.4 (148.6^min - 151.39^max) MB/s -8%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	77.7 (70.39^min - 77.73^max) MB/s -53%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4358 (4325.31^min - 4358.41^max) MB/s +100%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2518 (2508.69^min - 2518.06^max) MB/s +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2181 (2156.61^min - 2181.46^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (477 - 3426, n=39)	2058 MB/s -6%
Average of class Multimedia (416 - 4358, n=87, last 2 years)	1350 MB/s -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1105 (1023.06^min - 1104.63^max) MB/s -49%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1061 (1029.17^min - 1061^max) MB/s -51%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	353 (326.84^min - 352.62^max) MB/s -84%
4k q32 t16 write
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3101 (2756.05^min - 3100.73^max) MB/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3090 (3060.74^min - 3090.41^max) MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2002 (1558.72^min - 2002.2^max) MB/s -35%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (253 - 3567, n=39)	1535 MB/s -50%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=87, last 2 years)	1067 MB/s -66%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	508 (492.87^min - 507.89^max) MB/s -84%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	458 (428.82^min - 457.64^max) MB/s -85%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	148.5 (140.69^min - 148.5^max) MB/s -95%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9172 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	7141 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	7043 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (3573 - 8620, n=38)	5933 Points -16%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5928 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia (2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)	5067 Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	4894 Points -31%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4395 Points -38%
Score Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3369 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2447 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2413 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1079 - 3224, n=38)	2099 Points -13%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)	1695 Points -30%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1563 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	1487 Points -38%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	953 Points -61%
Score Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4082 Points +18%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3659 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3504 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3462 Points
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3036 Points -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1258 - 4036, n=38)	2819 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	2751 Points -21%
Average of class Multimedia (545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)	2567 Points -26%
Seq Read
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5353.82 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5351 MB/s
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5193.44 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5128 MB/s -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	4846.38 MB/s -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4685.43 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (2629 - 5546, n=38)	4658 MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia (1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)	4005 MB/s -25%
Seq Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5101 MB/s +30%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3925 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3440.79 MB/s -12%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3349.41 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2949.16 MB/s -25%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1108 - 3925, n=38)	2766 MB/s -30%
Average of class Multimedia (388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)	2553 MB/s -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	2533.8 MB/s -35%
4K Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	75.8 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	75.62 MB/s +16%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (39.2 - 85.1, n=38)	67.8 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	65.3 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)	62.7 MB/s -4%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	58.84 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	57.42 MB/s -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	54.93 MB/s -16%
4K Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	231 MB/s +51%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	199.96 MB/s +31%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)	188.5 MB/s +23%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	186.47 MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (105.4 - 216, n=38)	174.9 MB/s +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	168.76 MB/s +10%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	160.09 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	153.2 MB/s
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2780 MB/s +53%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1920.85 MB/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1813 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (533 - 2783, n=38)	1566 MB/s -14%
Average of class Multimedia (413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)	1231 MB/s -32%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	967.82 MB/s -47%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	947.86 MB/s -48%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	358.94 MB/s -80%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3341 MB/s +15%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3163.68 MB/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2973.32 MB/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2916 MB/s
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2541 MB/s -13%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (1010 - 3480, n=38)	2393 MB/s -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	2329.29 MB/s -20%
Average of class Multimedia (281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)	2123 MB/s -27%
Access Time Read
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	0.08 ms * -142%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.079 ms * -139%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)	0.0578 ms * -75%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.05 ms * -52%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (0.023 - 0.089, n=37)	0.048 ms * -45%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.034 ms * -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.033 ms *
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms * +45%
Access Time Write
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	0.07 ms * -159%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.069 ms * -156%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.06 ms * -122%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)	0.05992 ms * -122%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ (0.02 - 0.076, n=38)	0.03368 ms * -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.027 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.023 ms * +15%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms * +37%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read : DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5690 (5289.86-5704.67)

图形卡

在日常情况下，集成的 Arc GPU 负责图形计算，而在要求较高的应用中，Nvidia GPU 会自动开启。使用普通 Optimus 图形切换器，但不提供 MUX 切换器或高级 Optimus。笔记本电脑 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑Galaxy Book4 Ultra 内安装的 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑在高性能模式下的最大功耗为 80 瓦，在优化模式下为 55 瓦。

基准测试结果与旧款 Galaxy Book3 Ultra同样使用 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑，功耗为 55 瓦。这比 Radeon RX 6550M但 M3 Pro GPU 有时更快。对于多媒体笔记本电脑来说，RTX 4050 笔记本电脑仍然是一个不错的选择。不过，Galaxy Book4 Ultra 未能通过 3DMark 压力测试 (Time Spy) ，在持续负载下性能下降了 7%。

在电池模式下，Nvidia GPU 的最大功耗为 35 瓦，因此 GPU 性能降低了约 13%。其他 GPU 基准测试这里.

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	40870 Points +84%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H	30310 Points +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=36)	28539 Points +28%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	24603 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	22469 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	22216 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	20506 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)	18929 Points -15%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	29801 Points +78%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H	21212 Points +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13591 - 24007, n=34)	21045 Points +26%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17908 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16735 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	16174 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	14696 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)	14005 Points -16%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11496 Points +89%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H	8299 Points +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5107 - 9040, n=34)	7763 Points +28%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6941 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6073 Points
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	5859 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)	5310 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	4546 Points -25%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	21612 Points +81%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	14545 Points +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9394 - 16529, n=9)	13655 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia (1867 - 31403, n=39, last 2 years)	13102 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	11948 Points

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	108736 Points +59%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	83239 Points +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (63538 - 90075, n=33)	82182 Points +20%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H	79927 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	71151 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68509 Points
Average of class Multimedia (10769 - 120093, n=99, last 2 years)	57593 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	52441 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	33902 Points -51%

Geekbench 6.2 - GPU OpenCL
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (60815 - 86892, n=16)	78903 Points +30%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	75318 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	60815 Points
Average of class Multimedia (15217 - 112310, n=30, last 2 years)	58246 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	50373 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	30568 Points -50%

3DMark 11 Performance		21479 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14587 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		6449 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 99, n=45, last 2 years)	41.5 Seconds * -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	34 Seconds * -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	32 Seconds *
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	31 Seconds * +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=35)	29 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H	26 Seconds * +19%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	23 Seconds * +28%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 152, n=47, last 2 years)	74.4 Seconds * -33%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	61 Seconds * -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=35)	56.7 Seconds * -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	56 Seconds *
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	54 Seconds * +4%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H	52 Seconds * +7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	35 Seconds * +37%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Average of class Multimedia (29.6 - 132, n=8, last 2 years)	75.6 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	69 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia (190 - 1374, n=83, last 2 years)	447 Seconds * -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=35)	400 Seconds * -5%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	397 Seconds * -4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	393 Seconds * -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	386 Seconds * -2%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	380 Seconds *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core	314 Seconds * +17%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13905H	306 Seconds * +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Radeon RX 6550M, AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS	305 Seconds * +20%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在Galaxy Book4 Ultra 的 OLED 显示屏上，游戏看起来非常棒，由于响应时间极短，即使是快节奏的射击游戏也能让人乐在其中。相比之下，在游戏性能方面，RTX 4050 笔记本不得不接受妥协，目前的游戏几乎无法以设备的原生分辨率运行。最理想的分辨率是全高清分辨率，一般来说，你希望以最高的细节来玩游戏。对于要求非常苛刻的游戏或光线追踪，就无法避免使用 DLSS 等升频技术。

Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	99.9 pt
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	86.8 pt
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66.8 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65.6 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	58.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia	55.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 ^-1! AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M	47.5 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105.4 (100^min, 100^P1) fps +93%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84.9 (80^min) fps +56%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	62.7 (57^min) fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	60.1 (51^min) fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54.5 (51^min, 52^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)	50.6 fps -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M	49.4 (42^min) fps -9%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	96.8 (3.98^min, 55.6^P1) fps +43%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	96.5 (4.91^min, 66.7^P1) fps +43%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76.7 (12.6^min, 52.6^P1) fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67.6 (4.78^min, 43.5^P1) fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	65.3 (21.8^min, 35.7^P1) fps -3%
Average of class Multimedia (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years)	56.3 fps -17%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109 fps +92%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.5 fps +47%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	68.6 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56.9 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56.7 fps
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=89, last 2 years)	50.6 fps -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M	47.8 fps -16%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	196.7 (34.8^min, 146.3^P1) fps +74%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	144.1 (27^min, 110.8^P1) fps +28%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	121.3 (49.1^min, 95^P1) fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	113 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103.9 (65^min, 77.7^P1) fps -8%
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=86, last 2 years)	89.9 fps -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M	88.4 (66.9^min, 70.8^P1) fps -22%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	143.8 (126.1^min) fps +13%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	138.6 (117^min) fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	126.8 (108.1^min) fps
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	106.4 (89.8^min) fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M	103 (86.2^min) fps -19%
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 171.6, n=90, last 2 years)	101.6 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	73.5 (63.9^min) fps -42%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109.7 fps +35%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103.2 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	81.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	79 fps -3%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	69.7 fps -14%
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 131.1, n=95, last 2 years)	68.4 fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M	33 fps -60%

The Witcher 3 | F1 23 | Far Cry 5

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105.4 (100^min, 100^P1) fps +93%
Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84.9 (80^min) fps +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.5 - 94.7, n=38)	75.2 fps +38%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	62.7 (57^min) fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	60.1 (51^min) fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54.5 (51^min, 52^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)	50.6 fps -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M	49.4 (42^min) fps -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	43 fps -21%

F1 23 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25.7 - 60.8, n=14)	43.2 fps +68%
Average of class Multimedia (14 - 68.9, n=14, last 2 years)	39.1 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	25.7 (10^min, 19^P1) fps

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (50 - 127, n=21)	101.5 fps +27%
HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	87 (64^min) fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	80 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M	79 (70^min) fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71 (47^min) fps -11%
Average of class Multimedia (18 - 145, n=59, last 2 years)	70.7 fps -12%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø54.5 (51-62)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)			142.8	67.6	48.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)			121	54.5	46
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	162.2	147.6	141.3	126.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	130.2	77.8	56.7		40.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	122.4	104.2	81.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	132	93	88	80	58
Strange Brigade (2018)	321	158	127	113	77
F1 23 (2023)	145.5	137	93.7	25.7	16.7
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023)	74.2	54.3	45.7	39.4	23.3

排放 - 每款车型均配备蒸发室

噪音排放

三星在Galaxy Book4 Ultra 的两款机型上都安装了带有两个风扇的蒸汽腔冷却系统，总体而言，它给人留下了非常深刻的印象。在执行简单任务时，风扇通常会完全关闭，在短时间内达到负载峰值时风扇也不会启动。在负载情况下，噪音会明显增大，但笔记本电脑的最大噪音为 41.7 dB(A)，即使不戴耳机也能忍受。相反，在高性能模式下达到 51 分贝（A）时，声音就会大得多。评测设备中没有其他电子噪音

能耗曲线	3DMark 06	Witcher 3	赛博朋克 2077	压力测试
静音	36.2 dB(A)	36.2 dB(A)	36.2 dB(A)	32 dB(A)
优化型	37.9 dB(A)	41.7 dB(A)	41.7 dB(A)	41.7 dB(A)
高性能	41.7 dB(A)	50.5 dB(A)	51.3 dB(A)	51.3 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle		24.2 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A)
Load		37.9 / 41.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A)

	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 Radeon RX 6550M, R9 PRO 7940HS, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z	Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Noise		-8%	6%	-3%	11%	-19%	-5%
off / environment *	24.2	22.6 7%	24.4 -1%	22.7 6%	23.3 4%	25.9 -7%	25 -3%
Idle Minimum *	24.2	22.9 5%	24.4 -1%	22.7 6%	23.6 2%	25.9 -7%	26 -7%
Idle Average *	24.2	29.4 -21%	24.4 -1%	22.7 6%	23.6 2%	25.9 -7%	27 -12%
Idle Maximum *	24.2	29.4 -21%	24.4 -1%	27.5 -14%	23.6 2%	32 -32%	28 -16%
Load Average *	37.9	29.5 22%	26.9 29%	28.9 24%	29.2 23%	47.2 -25%	40 -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	41.7	52 -25%	25.1 40%	52.6 -26%	32.1 23%	53.1 -27%	39 6%
Load Maximum *	41.7	52 -25%	50.4 -21%	52.5 -26%	32.1 23%	53.1 -27%	41 2%

* ... smaller is better

温度

Galaxy Book4 Ultra 的金属外壳在闲置或运行简单任务时几乎不会发热。即使在压力测试中，表面温度也完全在限制范围内，因为我们在底座顶部测得的温度仅略低于 39 °C，而在底部后部中间区域测得的最高温度为 41.2 °C。这意味着您可以无限制地使用该设备。在压力测试中，处理器和显卡的功率很快就达到了 25/33 瓦。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


37.8 °C	38.5 °C	38.4 °C
35 °C	36.8 °C	36.9 °C
29 °C	31.9 °C	31.4 °C

Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 35.1 °C


39.8 °C	41.2 °C	38.3 °C
34.3 °C	38.3 °C	32.3 °C
31.2 °C	32 °C	30.1 °C

Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 35.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.1 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


23.5 °C	23.4 °C	23.3 °C
23.1 °C	23.2 °C	23 °C
23 °C	23 °C	23.2 °C

Maximum: 23.5 °C
Average: 23.2 °C


24 °C	24 °C	23.7 °C
23.6 °C	24.1 °C	23.8 °C
23.8 °C	23.8 °C	23.5 °C

Maximum: 24.1 °C
Average: 23.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


37.8 °C	38.7 °C	38.8 °C
34.7 °C	37.1 °C	36.5 °C
29.2 °C	31 °C	31.4 °C

Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 35 °C


40.8 °C	41.3 °C	38 °C
32.6 °C	39.2 °C	31.5 °C
31.3 °C	31.4 °C	30.1 °C

Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 35.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.9 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).

	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 6550M	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU	Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 Intel Core i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Heat		2%	2%	-17%	-13%	-19%	-5%
Maximum Upper Side *	38.5	43 -12%	38.1 1%	37.8 2%	39.6 -3%	46.7 -21%	41 -6%
Maximum Bottom *	41.2	41.6 -1%	37 10%	44.8 -9%	39.2 5%	54.1 -31%	44 -7%
Idle Upper Side *	23.5	21.2 10%	24.2 -3%	30.6 -30%	29 -23%	26.5 -13%	23 2%
Idle Bottom *	24.1	21.4 11%	24.6 -2%	31 -29%	31.6 -31%	26.8 -11%	26 -8%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

虽然总的来说，Galaxy Book4 Ultra 的音质还不错，但它无法与最好的 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑相媲美，例如 MacBook Pro, Yoga Pro 9i或惠普 Spectre x360 16.特别是，在直接对比中，这些模块可以更突出一些。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能量管理 - 增强耐力

耗电量

在空闲运行时，OLED 显示屏显示本身非常经济，但三星的深色标准壁纸有所帮助。在游戏模式下，根据游戏内容的不同，功耗大约在 80 到 90 瓦之间，而在压力测试中，功耗曾短暂达到 125 瓦，之后又迅速降至 90 瓦。在高性能模式下，最大功耗为 141.6 瓦，之后为 128 瓦。这说明所提供的 140 瓦电源适配器大小合适。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.24 / 0.52 Watt
Idle	4.8 / 7.5 / 7.9 Watt
Load	79.3 / 125 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 16.00	Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M, Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20	Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16.00	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-40%	-25%	-160%	-54%	11%	-80%	-38%
Idle Minimum *	4.8	7.5 -56%	4.5 6%	16 -233%	8.6 -79%	3 37%	9.98 ?(2 - 21.1, n=28) -108%	7.29 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=96, last 2 years) -52%
Idle Average *	7.5	9.6 -28%	16.5 -120%	30 -300%	12 -60%	5 33%	15 ?(5 - 32, n=28) -100%	11.8 ?(4.6 - 43, n=96, last 2 years) -57%
Idle Maximum *	7.9	18.5 -134%	16.7 -111%	30.4 -285%	12.4 -57%	11 -39%	18.9 ?(7.9 - 33.9, n=28) -139%	14.6 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=96, last 2 years) -85%
Load Average *	79.3	57.1 28%	60.4 24%	78.9 1%	80 -1%	72 9%	87.5 ?(52.4 - 151, n=28) -10%	77.7 ?(14.3 - 147, n=95, last 2 years) 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	79.2	115.8 -46%	52.1 34%	155.3 -96%	147.7 -86%	69.7 12%
Load Maximum *	125	131.7 -5%	102.9 18%	180.4 -44%	173.1 -38%	108 14%	179.8 ?(104.2 - 280, n=28) -44%	121 ?(47.7 - 247, n=95, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø79.2 (74.4-84.5)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø82.5 (73-125.3)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.32 (5.81-11.4)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø64.1 (57.9-91.8)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø90.1 (89.4-90.7)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.6 (27.2-44.5)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø65.1 (51.9-90.4)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø76.7 (70.6-85)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø76 (72.8-82.7)

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.07 (6.96-10.1)

电池寿命

电池容量为 76 Wh，保持不变，但由于采用了新的 Meteor Lake 处理器，电池续航时间更长。顺便提一下，我们只能在 120 Hz 的频率下进行电池测试，因为尽管在活动信号模式下选择了 60 Hz，但仍保持在 120 Hz。我们在Galaxy Book4 系列的其他机型上也发现了这个问题。

在 150 cd/m²（相当于评测设备最大 SDR 亮度的 66%）的 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们记录了将近 11 个小时，比前代产品长了将近 1.5 个小时。在全亮度条件下，Wi-Fi 测试持续了 7 个多小时。视频测试运行时间（同样为 150 cd/m²）从约 13.5 小时增加到近 18 小时。这就是全新 Meteor Lake 处理器及其低功耗内核的优势所在。

在负载情况下，大约 80 分钟就可以耗尽电池电量，全亮度 HDR 视频可播放约 5.5 小时。使用 140 瓦的 PSU 充电大约需要 2.5 小时，而且没有快速充电功能。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		10h 56min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		7h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 18min

	Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad Z16 Gen 2 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon RX 6550M, 72 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro Apple M3 Pro 12-Core, M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh	HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-9%	43%	-40%	1%	-29%	-0%	-7%
H.264	1076		1481 38%			470 -56%	803 -25%	710 ?(319 - 1481, n=53, last 2 years) -34%
WiFi v1.3	656	357 -46%	1204 84%	395 -40%	660 1%	467 -29%	576 -12%	572 ?(274 - 1204, n=95, last 2 years) -13%
Load	78	101 29%	83 6%			77 -1%	106 36%	97.7 ?(39 - 215, n=76, last 2 years) 25%
Reader / Idle		612					1093	933 ?(506 - 1571, n=25, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 优质外壳

+ 出色的 OLED 屏幕，色彩准确

+ 电池寿命长

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 2 个固态硬盘插槽

+ 有效的气室冷却

+ 雷电 4 和 HDMI 2.1

Cons

- 焊接 RAM

- PWM 不断闪烁

- 读卡器不稳定

- 无 Wi-Fi 7

结论 -Galaxy Book4 Ultra 仅有微小改进

评论：SamsungGalaxy Book4 Ultra。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。

从根本上说，三星为自己目前的Galaxy Book4 Ultra 带来了生活上的便利，因为这款 16 英寸的多媒体电脑已经获得了新的流星湖处理器，然而，除此之外，它还是和原来一样。有两种不同的配置和酷睿至尊 7 155H和 GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑评测变体适合作为多媒体机器。组件性能不错，各种能耗曲线也很均衡。此外，新的流星湖处理器还提高了电池续航时间。

120 Hz 的显示屏也提供了非常好的图像质量，各种色彩配置文件包括非常精确的 P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间配置文件。尽管如此，还是存在一些问题，如持续的 240 Hz PWM 闪烁，而且该设备的 HDR 功能也受到很大限制，尤其是与迷你 LED 竞争对手相比，如联想 Yoga Pro 9i或 Apple MacBook Pro 16.

Galaxy Book4 Ultra 是一款非常出色的多媒体计算机，它将 AMOLED 显示屏与高级机壳结合在一起，机壳内有一个有效的蒸发腔，性能不错，电池续航时间长。遗憾的是，三星在内存和存储方面偷工减料。2399 美元只能获得 16GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘。

不过，它也存在一些缺点，比如底部边框过宽和采用焊接内存。特别是，在我们的评测配置中，16 GB 内存并不是特别宽裕。此外，键盘也很一般，主要原因是键程有限。

不过，最大的问题还是价格，三星为我们的 16GB 内存和 512GB SSD 评测机型开出了 2399 美元的高价。即使是配备 M3 Pro 和 HDR 功能明显更好的 MacBook Pro 16，在商店里也要便宜 200 美元左右。Windows 系统的竞争产品也更便宜，而且还有其他优势。联想 Yoga Pro 9i 提供了更好的键盘、更亮的迷你 LED 面板和更好的扬声器。申克公司的 Vision 16 Pro 仍然是一款非常便携的 16 英寸设备，配备速度更快的 RTX 4070 和无 PWM 的 IPS 面板。Galaxy Book4 Ultra 绝不是一款糟糕的机器，但考虑到这一细分市场上竞争设备的强劲实力，它的性价比并不是特别高，而且很快它就会在市场上迎来另一个竞争对手，那就是新款戴尔 XPS 16。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

GalaxyBook4 Ultra 可以直接从三星公司订购，起价 2399 美元。

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra - 2024-03-16 03/16/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

83 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

80%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

68 / 80 → 85%

Weight

65 / 20-72 → 87%

Battery

90 / 95 → 94%

Display

90%

Games Performance

91 / 90 → 100%

Application Performance

93 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

91%

Noise

93 / 95 → 98%

Audio

88%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Average

82%

90%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 88 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 390604 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra 评测--配备 120 Hz OLED 和 RTX 4050 的多媒体笔记本电脑

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-03-18 (Update: 2024-03-18)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Lenovo Legion Slim 7 16APH8 R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2564
Beelink SER7 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	2565
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2567
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2576
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2580
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	2581
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2586
...
(max) TR Pro 7995WX, RTX 6000 Ada Generation	15842

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
Gigabyte G5 KC i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	21277
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21324
SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	21371
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	21479
R9 5900X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050	21488
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21563
Asus G701VIK-BA049T i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile	21727
...
(max) R7 7800X3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	72163

三星Galaxy Book4 Ultra 评测--配备 120 Hz OLED 和 RTX 4050 的多媒体笔记本电脑

潜在的竞争对手比较

保护套 -Galaxy Book 配有金属保护套

尺寸比较

功能 - 雷电 4 和 HDMI 2.1

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 超大触摸板，普通键盘

显示屏 - 120 Hz AMOLED

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 流星湖取代猛禽湖

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

大容量存储器

Continuous Performance Read : DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放 - 每款车型均配备蒸发室

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra audio analysis

Lenovo Slim Pro 9i 16IRP8 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max audio analysis

HP Spectre x360 16 RTX 4050 audio analysis

能量管理 - 增强耐力

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 -Galaxy Book4 Ultra 仅有微小改进

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare