Notebookcheck Logo

雷蛇灵刃17 Pro笔记本电脑评测

17寸轻薄游戏本的标杆。 尽管需几次尝试，但雷蛇终于精心制作了一款近乎完美的Blade笔记本电脑，并且是其尺寸类别中最好的游戏笔记本电脑之一。 这款最新的Blade Pro功能扔掉了了前几代产品很多不重要的功能，实现了更轻，更小，更高效，更简化的游戏体验，让每个人——不仅仅是Razer粉丝——都能欣赏的来。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Blade Pro 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1090 MHz, Memory: 1600 MHz, GDDR6, 430.86, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-2666，19-19-19-43，双通道
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, AUO409D, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
Soundcard
NVIDIA TU104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
5 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 5 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm组合, Card Reader: SD reader (UHS-III)
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 395 x 260
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer Synapse, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.75 kg, Power Supply: 790 g
Price
3200 USD
Links
Razer homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

❌
424 mm 281 mm 22.5 mm 3.6 kg412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg410 mm 292.5 mm 23 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg396 mm 259 mm 19 mm 2.3 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader UHS-III, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.0b, Kensington Lock
Right: SD reader UHS-III, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.0b, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm combo audio
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
176.6 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s -54%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
50 MB/s -71%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207.8 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s -58%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
52 MB/s -74%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
697 MBit/s
Alienware m17 P37E
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
659 MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s -13%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
528 MBit/s -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s -49%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
686 MBit/s
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
671 MBit/s -2%
Alienware m17 P37E
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s -13%
305.8
cd/m²		290.9
cd/m²		291.9
cd/m²
289.1
cd/m²		299.3
cd/m²		288.7
cd/m²
292.4
cd/m²		289.9
cd/m²		294
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 305.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 299.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1032:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.55 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
88.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.30, 3840x2160		MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080		Alienware m17 P37E
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160
Display
2%
4%
40%
6%
38%
Display P3 Coverage
60.6
62.9
4%
64
6%
88.9
47%
63.6
5%
86.4
43%
sRGB Coverage
89
87.8
-1%
90.4
2%
100
12%
95.4
7%
99.9
12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
62.1
63.9
3%
64.8
4%
99.7
61%
65.5
5%
99.1
60%
Response Times
-3%
-81%
-547%
-6%
-308%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.8 ?(3.4, 3.4)
7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)
-6%
15.6 ?(8, 7.6)
-129%
60.8 ?(28.8, 32)
-794%
7.6 ?(3.8, 3.8)
-12%
35.6 ?(19.6, 16)
-424%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
-0%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-33%
38.4 ?(22, 16.4)
-300%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-0%
28 ?(16, 12)
-192%
PWM Frequency
204.9 ?(20)
25510 ?(17)
Screen
13%
-30%
-22%
24%
-29%
Brightness middle
299.3
288
-4%
299.1
0%
230
-23%
355
19%
357.9
20%
Brightness
294
287
-2%
273
-7%
207
-30%
327
11%
347
18%
Brightness Distribution
94
91
-3%
81
-14%
83
-12%
85
-10%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.29
0.2
31%
0.27
7%
0.2
31%
0.26
10%
0.33
-14%
Contrast
1032
1440
40%
1108
7%
1150
11%
1365
32%
1085
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.55
2.33
9%
5.07
-99%
5.62
-120%
1.54
40%
6.57
-158%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.73
5.34
-13%
10.55
-123%
10.24
-116%
3
37%
9.86
-108%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.9
2.47
15%
3.31
-14%
0.77
73%
6.74
-132%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.5
1.19
66%
6.8
-94%
4.54
-30%
2.19
37%
4.3
-23%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.36 93%
2.42 91%
2.6 85%
CCT
7101 92%
6710 97%
7805 83%
6625 98%
6893 94%
6403 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
57
0%
58.5
3%
88
54%
61
7%
88.4
55%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88.7
88
-1%
89.9
1%
100
13%
95
7%
100
13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 9%
-36% / -30%
-176% / -80%
8% / 17%
-100% / -52%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1076 (1067.18-1187.86)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1017 (1007.38-1101.08)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points +18%
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
191 Points +6%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
183.7 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
166 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
158 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
2022 Points +71%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points +46%
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1238 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1227 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
821 Points -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points -32%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
771 Points -35%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=10)
2.1 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1.64 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=10)
13 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9.21 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.39 Points
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=13)
33539 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=13)
6923 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
197.1 s *
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  ()
154.4 s *
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.7 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
180 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1180 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
119.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (5374 - 6202, n=9)
5842 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
5632 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points -3%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3991 Points -30%
Essentials
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9608 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9473 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (8791 - 9927, n=9)
9356 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8780 Points -7%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
8711 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
8255 Points -13%
Productivity
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8416 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (7180 - 8200, n=9)
7640 Points +2%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
7599 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7482 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7331 Points -2%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
5259 Points -30%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8419 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (6675 - 8862, n=9)
7594 Points +5%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
7325 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7227 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7219 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3975 Points -45%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4861 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (4207 - 5539, n=9)
4603 Points +4%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4550 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4412 Points
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3812 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6004 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (4755 - 6593, n=9)
5755 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5672 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5663 Points 0%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4765 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
2486 Points -56%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4412 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5672 points
PCMark 10 Score
5734 points
Help
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Alienware m17 P37E
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)		MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
AS SSD
-40%
-26%
-10%
-19%
7%
Seq Read
1831
1315
-28%
1835
0%
1153
-37%
2599
42%
3005
64%
Seq Write
1744
927
-47%
1121
-36%
1328
-24%
588
-66%
2668
53%
4K Read
45.16
52.4
16%
23.98
-47%
35.05
-22%
37.57
-17%
40.89
-9%
4K Write
107.1
122.8
15%
100
-7%
96
-10%
104.4
-3%
94.4
-12%
4K-64 Read
1240
326.5
-74%
687
-45%
727
-41%
1116
-10%
1366
10%
4K-64 Write
1695
727
-57%
776
-54%
1212
-28%
513
-70%
1197
-29%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.11
-72%
0.047
27%
0.063
2%
0.051
20%
0.055
14%
Access Time Write *
0.037
0.045
-22%
0.053
-43%
0.04
-8%
0.036
3%
0.039
-5%
Score Read
1468
510
-65%
895
-39%
878
-40%
1414
-4%
1708
16%
Score Write
1977
942
-52%
988
-50%
1441
-27%
676
-66%
1558
-21%
Score Total
4197
1715
-59%
2306
-45%
2784
-34%
2715
-35%
4123
-2%
Copy ISO MB/s
2086
773
-63%
1487
-29%
Copy Program MB/s
425.5
493
16%
608
43%
Copy Game MB/s
555
647
17%
1162
109%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3179 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1859 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 429.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 384.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1115 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1146 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.03 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 100.7 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
27228 Points +18%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
25126 Points +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
23032 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (18048 - 23032, n=19)
20658 Points -10%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
20323 Points -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
19236 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
18879 Points -18%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7820HK
18505 Points -20%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
15088 Points -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
13355 Points -42%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11332 Points -51%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9292 Points -60%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
8004 Points -65%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7374 Points -68%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11099 Points +25%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
10243 Points +16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8844 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (6464 - 8844, n=19)
7903 Points -11%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7446 Points -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
7431 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
6380 Points -28%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7820HK
6101 Points -31%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5657 Points -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
4867 Points -45%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3626 Points -59%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
5660 Points +10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
5148 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (3698 - 5295, n=19)
4531 Points -12%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
4100 Points -20%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
39651 Points +28%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
30910 Points
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
28083 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (23386 - 30910, n=20)
27852 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
24868 Points -20%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7820HK
24425 Points -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
24172 Points -22%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
20181 Points -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
17170 Points -44%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
13125 Points -58%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12620 Points -59%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
9805 Points -68%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
9032 Points -71%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13883 Points +14%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
12538 Points +3%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12441 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12170 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (9212 - 14894, n=20)
11726 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11597 Points -5%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
10129 Points -17%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7820HK
9607 Points -21%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9159 Points -25%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
8450 Points -31%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
7932 Points -35%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6839 Points -44%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
6644 Points -45%
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark 11 Performance
22693 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38597 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18887 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8460 points
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
103.4 (81min - 119max) fps +18%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
100 fps +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (65.7 - 92.7, n=22)
79.2 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
73.1 fps -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
71.8 fps -18%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
64.9 fps -26%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.4 fps -26%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
64.2 fps -27%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
57.6 (46min) fps -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps -44%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
40 fps -54%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
35.4 (28min) fps -59%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
27.9 fps -68%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
12.6 fps -86%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø83.5 (31-90)
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 307.6 282.2 252.3 177.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 287.9 237.3 152.2 87.4
Rocket League (2017) 249 247.7 248.4
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)		MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Noise
-8%
-3%
4%
-7%
-8%
off / environment *
28.2
29
-3%
28.2
-0%
28.3
-0%
30
-6%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
29
-3%
28.2
-0%
31.5
-12%
30
-6%
31
-10%
Idle Average *
28.2
32
-13%
28.2
-0%
31.6
-12%
31
-10%
32
-13%
Idle Maximum *
30.8
40
-30%
31
-1%
31.6
-3%
33
-7%
41
-33%
Load Average *
42
46
-10%
50.8
-21%
32.3
23%
43
-2%
47
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
51
-0%
50.8
-0%
43
16%
55
-8%
47
8%
Load Maximum *
53
52
2%
50.8
4%
45.5
14%
58
-9%
48
9%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
28.2 / 28.2 / 30.8 dB(A)
Load
42 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Max. Load
 38.2 °C43 °C37.2 °C 
 33.6 °C38 °C31.8 °C 
 31 °C26.8 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 30.6 °C
39 °C47.2 °C40.6 °C
33.8 °C42.4 °C36 °C
31 °C35.2 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 47.2 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  59 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.6442538.140.73137.939.34038.939.55037.336.36336.836.48035.337.210034.242.912533.148.416033.558.320032.962.325031.467.831531.171.44003170.150030.271.663029.472.680029.175.7100028.773.8125028.175.3160027.974.6200027.671.1250027.667.7315027.463.1400027.466.3500027.170.9630027.271.1800027.164.3100002759.21250026.956.71600026.954.6SPL40.283.6N3.960.4median 28.1median 67.8Delta1.95.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-QApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.65 / 1.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 16.2 / 20.4 / 26.1 Watt
Load midlight 96.5 / 214.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.30		Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.30		MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30		MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.30		MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Power Consumption
-9%
-47%
13%
-8%
17%
Idle Minimum *
16.2
19
-17%
31
-91%
13
20%
13.9
14%
10
38%
Idle Average *
20.4
22
-8%
36
-76%
17
17%
18.8
8%
15
26%
Idle Maximum *
26.1
29
-11%
44
-69%
23
12%
23.1
11%
22
16%
Load Average *
96.5
102
-6%
107
-11%
90
7%
112.3
-16%
92
5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
182.9
190
-4%
212
-16%
147
20%
231
-26%
153
16%
Load Maximum *
214.3
231
-8%
258
-20%
215
-0%
291.5
-36%
216
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
4h 55min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 26min
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh		Alienware m17 P37E
i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh		Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh		MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh		MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
-4%
16%
-32%
-17%
11%
5%
Reader / Idle
295
372
26%
543
84%
253
-14%
464
57%
WiFi v1.3
280
235
-16%
296
6%
190
-32%
197
-30%
316
13%
294
5%
Load
86
67
-22%
49
-43%
81
-6%
54
-37%
Witcher 3 ultra
52

Pros

+ Thunderbolt 3,2.5 Gbit以太网和UHS-III SD读卡器
+ 易维护性; 2x SODIMM + 2x M.2 2280
+ 高于平均水平的RTX 2080 Max-Q性能
+ 小巧轻便的AC适配器
+ 时尚，经典的Razer设计
+ Windows Hello
+ Wi-Fi 6标配
+ 低负荷时安静
+ 单键RGB照明
+ 机身刚性强

Cons

- Core i7-9750H并不比Core i7-8750H性能强
- 比Blade Pro 2017更弱的网络摄像头（1 MP vs. 2 MP）
- 在高性能游戏时不够安静
- 键盘和触控板的反馈很软
- 比Blade Pro 2017更小的电池
- AC适配器电缆很难处理
- 尚无4K UHD，240 Hz或OLED选项
- 没有低音炮或指纹识别器
- 延长保修很昂贵
- 没有2.5英寸SATA III托架
- 没有G-Sync
In review: Razer Blade Pro 17 RZ09-0287. Test model provided by Razer
In review: Razer Blade Pro 17 RZ09-0287. Test model provided by Razer

从历史上看，Razer Blade Pro笔记本电脑一直具有新颖的功能，可以将自己与竞争对手区分开来。例如，Blade Pro 2015具有独特的屏幕，而Blade Pro 2017则具有机械键盘，触控板灯，THX认证和音量滚轮。 2019年的Blade Pro 17删减了所有这些奇特的功能，专注于基础，结果是一台Razer最出色的Blade笔记本电脑。一代一代的改进实际上是有形的，而不仅仅是边缘的;与上一代Blade Pro 2017 GTX 1080相比，它在的重量减轻22％，体积减小24％，屏幕亮度增加30％，能效提高14％，同时提供高达39％的图形性能提升，和轻松升级的RAM，储存。

我们认为有几个方面可以使Blade Pro 17更好。 MSI笔记本电脑上的SteelSeries键盘更坚固，更深的键程可以提高触感，而软绵绵的触控板肯定可以从MacBook Pro中获取一些灵感。高性能的风扇噪音比Blade Pro 2017更安静，但它仍然超过50 dB（A）。用于在平衡模式和高性能模式之间切换的宏键将比每次打开Synapse更快更容易。集成专用的低音炮可以提高音频质量，而无需THX认证。同时，AC适配器电缆太绷紧，可以做得更薄，更灵活，便于携带。不过这些缺点不足以阻止其成为类别领先的游戏笔记本电脑。

价格可能会成为阻止游戏玩家大肆挥霍。只需2500美元，用户就可以购买具有相同i7-9750H CPU和RTX 2080 Max-Q GPU的Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH，而同配置的Blade Pro 17售价则高达3200美元。更豪华的设计带来的溢价是否可以接受是您自己需要考量的问题。然而，对于我们来说，由于相对Blade Pro 2017的所有重大改进，现款现在比以往任何时候都更值得考虑。

Razer简化了Blade Pro系列，提升了整体游戏体验。如果你正在市场上选购一台17英寸的轻薄游戏笔记本电脑，请跳过臃肿的Blade Pro 2017并考虑更精简的Blade Pro 17.它会比一些竞争对手花费更多，但它感觉起来也更好。

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q - 09/20/2019 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
94 / 98 → 96%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 87%
Weight
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Battery
62 / 95 → 65%
Display
87%
Games Performance
95%
Application Performance
90%
Temperature
87 / 95 → 92%
Noise
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
80%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
78%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Blade Pro 17 Series)

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 雷蛇灵刃17 Pro笔记本电脑评测
Allen Ngo, 2019-08-10 (Update: 2019-08-10)