Notebookcheck Logo

MSI GT76 9SG 笔记本电脑评测：游戏巨人

为强劲而生。 来自MSI的全新GT76 Titan DT应该对那些“习武之人“特别有吸引力。 得益于酷睿i9-9900K和GeForce RTX 2080，这款17英寸笔记本电脑为现代游戏提供了充足的动力。
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook MSI
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG (GT76 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-9900K 8 x 3.6 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-R, socketed
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1575 MHz, Memory: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 425.31, Optimus
Memory
64 GB 
, 4x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, PC4-21300, 双通道
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Cannon Lake Z390 (Cannon Lake-H)
Storage
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), 512 GB 
, NVMe SSDs + WDC WD10SPZX, 1 TB HDD, 5400 rpm, Slots: three M.2-2280 slots (one of which is free) & one 2.5-inch drive bay
Soundcard
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Connections
6 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 一个耳机插孔，一个麦克风插孔, Card Reader: MicroSD
Networking
Killer E3000 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 42 x 397 x 330
Battery
90 Wh, 6250 mAh Lithium-Ion, 8 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.1 Dynaudio, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, RGB背光, Keyboard Light: yes, two 230-watt AC adapters, various utilities from the manufacturer, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
4.167 kg, Power Supply: 1.87 kg
Price
4560 EUR
Links
MSI homepage
MSI notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76

Size Comparison

❌
425 mm 319 mm 51 mm 4.7 kg418 mm 295 mm 41 mm 4.3 kg402.6 mm 319.2 mm 42 mm 3.9 kg397 mm 330 mm 42 mm 4.2 kg397 mm 268.5 mm 27.5 mm 2.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=5, last 2 years)
1135 MBit/s +55%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
730 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
712 MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
682 MBit/s -7%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
680 MBit/s -7%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
629 MBit/s -14%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=5, last 2 years)
1369 MBit/s +98%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
690 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
673 MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
671 MBit/s -3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
661 MBit/s -4%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
652 MBit/s -6%
378
cd/m²		380
cd/m²		357
cd/m²
382
cd/m²		396
cd/m²		355
cd/m²
380
cd/m²		373
cd/m²		353
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 396 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 372.7 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 396 cd/m²
Contrast: 1200:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale 2.83 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080		Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
LG Philips 173WFG, IPS, 1920x1080		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160		MSI GE75 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080		Asus ROG G703GX
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
4%
33%
-1%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
62.3
66.3
6%
86.3
39%
61.5
-1%
64.1
3%
sRGB Coverage
93.4
96.9
4%
100
7%
92
-1%
93.3
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
64.3
66.5
3%
99.1
54%
63.5
-1%
65.6
2%
Response Times
-37%
-268%
15%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 ?(4.4, 3.6)
13.2 ?(8, 5.2)
-65%
41.6 ?(20.4, 21.2)
-420%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
10%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
10%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
-8%
21.6 ?(9.6, 12)
-116%
6.6 ?(3.2, 3.4)
34%
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
4%
PWM Frequency
26040 ?(20)
26040 ?(10)
0%
Screen
-31%
-33%
2%
-44%
Brightness middle
396
335.2
-15%
343
-13%
400.7
1%
296
-25%
Brightness
373
297
-20%
328
-12%
372
0%
279
-25%
Brightness Distribution
89
82
-8%
82
-8%
89
0%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.33
0.66
-100%
0.31
6%
0.34
-3%
0.25
24%
Contrast
1200
508
-58%
1106
-8%
1179
-2%
1184
-1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.04
2.02
1%
5.03
-147%
1.33
35%
4.77
-134%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.85
7.23
-88%
7.91
-105%
3.51
9%
9.08
-136%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.82
1.17
-43%
0.86
-5%
1.39
-70%
1.46
-78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.83
3.2
-13%
6.29
-122%
1.3
54%
5.83
-106%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.16 102%
2.38 92%
2.24 98%
2.47 89%
CCT
7113 91%
6746 96%
6389 102%
6735 97%
8076 80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
61.3
4%
88
49%
58.2
-1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
96.9
3%
100
6%
92.1
-2%
93
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-21% / -25%
-89% / -50%
5% / 4%
-12% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 26040 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1998 (1943.92-2022.14)
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1875 (1847.15-1952.27)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1887 (1858.65-1934.33)
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2022 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
212 Points
Help
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +26%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
207 Points -2%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points -11%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
167 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points +52%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
2022 Points
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
Intel Core i9-9900K
1979 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Intel Core i9-9900K
1944 Points -4%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points -15%
Asus ROG G703GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1212 Points -40%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
697 Points +37%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
509 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7383 Points +50%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
4926 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points -25%
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7050 Points +7%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
7006 Points +6%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6599 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points -4%
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5680 Points -14%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)		Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		MSI GE75 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Asus ROG G703GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
20%
25%
-3%
-15%
Write 4K
101.4
111.1
10%
183.2
81%
116.1
14%
90.4
-11%
Read 4K
40.57
45.47
12%
52.4
29%
44.98
11%
39.19
-3%
Write Seq
2229
2454
10%
1790
-20%
2370
6%
1863
-16%
Read Seq
2528
2212
-12%
1743
-31%
1465
-42%
2100
-17%
Write 4K Q32T1
379.6
622
64%
550
45%
337.5
-11%
260.2
-31%
Read 4K Q32T1
421.9
695
65%
648
54%
453.6
8%
297
-30%
Write Seq Q32T1
2439
2675
10%
3236
33%
2399
-2%
1870
-23%
Read Seq Q32T1
3199
3184
0%
3538
11%
3087
-4%
3471
9%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
58737 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21988 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10290 points
Help
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100Tooltip
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0): Ø95.9 (90-101)
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)
29268 Points +16%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
27080 Points +8%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
26223 Points +4%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
25126 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
24623 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
23089 Points -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=231, last 2 years)
11960 Points +17%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
10720 Points +5%
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
10364 Points +1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
10243 Points
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
9754 Points -5%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=152, last 2 years)
7658 Points +35%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5852 Points +3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5660 Points
Asus ROG G703GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5649 Points 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5538 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
5383 Points -5%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=224, last 2 years)
116.1 fps +16%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
101.1 fps +1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
100 fps
Asus ROG G703GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
99.7 fps 0%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
95.3 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
94.5 fps -5%
low med. high ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 186 100 66.9
Apex Legends (2019) 144 144 144 128 75
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 128 121 108 96 57
Metro Exodus (2019) 109 82.2 68.3 54.4 35.6
Anthem (2019) 130 120 112 83.7 48.6
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 212 171 101 79.2
The Division 2 (2019) 169 136 103 72 40
Anno 1800 (2019) 115 92.2 54.3 47.8 34.9
Rage 2 (2019) 144 122 119 78.1 39.1

Noise Level

Idle
33 / 34 / 44 dB(A)
Load
47 / 59 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
5%
10%
5%
18%
off / environment *
30
28.1
6%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
30
-0%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=182, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Minimum *
33
28.1
15%
30
9%
30.4
8%
30
9%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=183, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Average *
34
28.6
16%
33
3%
30.4
11%
35
-3%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=183, last 2 years)
19%
Idle Maximum *
44
51
-16%
35
20%
33.4
24%
41
7%
30.7 ?(21.9 - 47, n=183, last 2 years)
30%
Load Average *
47
51
-9%
44
6%
37.1
21%
44
6%
43 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=183, last 2 years)
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
51
4%
55
-4%
54.2
-2%
51
4%
Load Maximum *
59
51
14%
58
2%
56.4
4%
52
12%
53.4 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=183, last 2 years)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 42 °C42 °C51 °C 
 41 °C42 °C42 °C 
 33 °C36 °C34 °C 
Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 40.3 °C
57 °C53 °C45 °C
50 °C48 °C45 °C
36 °C33 °C34 °C
Maximum: 57 °C
Average: 44.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  53 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-10%
-6%
-21%
-5%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
47
8%
45
12%
48.8
4%
50
2%
46 ?(28.2 - 60, n=182, last 2 years)
10%
Maximum Bottom *
57
58.8
-3%
45
21%
52
9%
50
12%
49.4 ?(30 - 66.3, n=182, last 2 years)
13%
Idle Upper Side *
26
31
-19%
36
-38%
36.2
-39%
30
-15%
31.4 ?(21.2 - 42.8, n=182, last 2 years)
-21%
Idle Bottom *
28
35
-25%
33
-18%
44.4
-59%
33
-18%
32.5 ?(22.6 - 45, n=182, last 2 years)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.835.32541.340.43131.833.84036.338.65030.442.86326.248.78029.443.810025.354.612523.258.716027.96520022.962.125021.971.331520.973.240019.776.550018.777.86301879.780017.488100017.583.2125018.772.6160017.472.5200017.273250017.570.6315017.470.9400017.370.1500017.668.7630017.364.6800017.365.71000017.258.91250017.361.51600017.160.2SPL30.189.8N1.478.1median 17.5median 70.9Delta1.76.443.442.537.237.3303835.538.427.136.327.338.327.247.328.253.225.154.322.464.223.370.42273.920.676.718.877.919.372.318.363.717.866.918.371.817.681.217.184.417.285.917.183.717.179.517.272.717.180.61779.417.177.117.170.717.26516.966.429.892.71.394.7median 17.6median 73.91.97.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GT76 Titan DT 9SGMSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 1.1 / 2.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 14 / 18 / 23 Watt
Load midlight 114 / 443 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-42%
-74%
8%
-4%
5%
Idle Minimum *
14
23.3
-66%
39
-179%
13.9
1%
5
64%
13.7 ?(2 - 64, n=177, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Average *
18
33.5
-86%
45
-150%
18.8
-4%
24
-33%
19.1 ?(8 - 67, n=177, last 2 years)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
23
38.4
-67%
55
-139%
23.1
-0%
42
-83%
26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=177, last 2 years)
-17%
Load Average *
114
114.1
-0%
122
-7%
112.3
1%
112
2%
110.9 ?(32.1 - 202, n=177, last 2 years)
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
283
339.5
-20%
259
8%
231
18%
284
-0%
Load Maximum *
443
485.1
-10%
346
22%
291.5
34%
320
28%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=176, last 2 years)
44%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 49min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 52min
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh		Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Turing
i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh		MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh		Asus ROG G703GX
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-31%
-30%
-3%
1%
39%
Reader / Idle
409
155
-62%
165
-60%
301
-26%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=84, last 2 years)
33%
WiFi v1.3
302
127
-58%
135
-55%
294
-3%
238
-21%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
22%
Load
52
66
27%
65
25%
78
50%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
62%
H.264
135
226
399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 很多维护和升级选项
+ 很多接口
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 完美的性能表现
+ RGB照明
+ 窄边框
+ 144赫兹

Cons

- 声音大
- 后背突出
- 非常重
- 需要两块电源
- 没有G-Sync
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG; review device provided courtesy of: MSI Taiwan.
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG; review device provided courtesy of: MSI Taiwan.

GT76 9SG Titan DT是一款非凡的游戏笔记本，至少就价格和性能而言。即使在要求极高的游戏中，它也可以实现非常高的帧率。

一流的性能是以牺牲安静为代价的，这可能会吓跑一些潜在用户（我们建议在GT76游戏时使用耳机）。 一旦你把沉重的重量，大的机身和两个电源适配器放在一边，真的没什么好抱怨的。

GT76为您提供了许多端口（雷电 3），良好的输入设备和良好的音质。 144 Hz超薄边框显示器的图像质量对于具有这种价格标签的设备来说是可接受的。 此外，扩展的维护和升级选项也很不错。

More articles related to this device

MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG (GT76 Series)

Pricecompare

MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
MSI GT76
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > MSI GT76 9SG 笔记本电脑评测：游戏巨人
Florian Glaser, 2019-08-23 (Update: 2019-08-23)