Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar戴尔Precision 5470工作站回顾。Nvidia RTX A1000首次亮相
Precision 5470是戴尔迄今为止最小的移动工作站。与XPS 17启发的 Precision 5750和XPS 15启发的 Precision 556014英寸Precision 5470在外观和设计方面受到XPS 13 9300/9310的启发。如果你过去玩过XPS系统，那么Precision 5470的外观和感觉应该非常熟悉。
Precision 5470的两个显著因素涉及其第12代酷睿H系列CPU和可选的Nvidia RTX A1000 GPU，考虑到14英寸的外形尺寸，其处理能力非常大。我们的特定审查单位配备了酷睿i9-12900H CPU、A1000 GPU和1600p光面触摸屏，零售价约为3000美元。其他配有i5-12500H到i7-12800H的SKU，仅集成Iris Xe图形，以及哑光1200p显示屏，也有较低的起始价格。
直接竞争对手包括其他高端14英寸移动工作站，如 惠普ZBook Firefly 14或 联想ThinkPad P14s.当谈到工作站时，这一尺寸类别仍然是新的，因此我们也将把Precision 5470与一些较大的机型进行比较，而不是像 ThinkPad P15 G2或戴尔自己的Precision 5560。
更多戴尔评论。
Dell Precision 5000 5470 (Precision 5000 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 91 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1140 MHz, Memory: 1375 MHz, 40 W TDP, GDDR6, 516.54, Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, LPDDR5, 5200 MHz, dual-channel, soldered, 32-24-24-52
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 216 PPI, 10-point capacitive, AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, Controller: AUO4F9B, Dell P/N: X6NRM, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB
Weight
1.621 kg, Power Supply: 415 g
Price
3200 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.6 % | 09/2022 | Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU | 1.6 kg | 18.95 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.2 % | 06/2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.3 % | 10/2021 | Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2400 | |
| 85.2 % | 09/2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD R7 PRO 5850U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.2 % | 09/2021 | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA i7-1165G7, T500 Laptop GPU | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.4 % | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 i7-10610U, Quadro P520 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
案例 - XPS外观和感觉
在撰写本文时，还没有XPS 14，但Precision 5470基本上是其前身。它舒适地坐落在经典的13英寸XPS 13和15英寸 XPS 15同时利用同样的灰色镁合金外壳和碳纤维甲板，这已经成为XPS型号的标准。
底盘质量很好，在试图扭转或弯曲其表面时只有轻微的吱吱作响或翘曲。它当然比新的XPS 13 9320感觉更强大，更专业。 新的XPS 13 9320设计。尽管如此，铰链本可以更硬或更坚硬，以获得更好的寿命感。
14英寸的Precision 5470比13英寸的XPS 13 9300大得多，也重得多，有明显的差距。它甚至比XPS 15还要厚一点，而在重量上则更接近XPS 15而不是XPS 13。然而，就其级别而言，它仍然非常紧凑，特别是在与惠普萤火虫14 G8或ThinkPad P14s相比的占地面积方面。
连接性 - 只有USB-C
端口选项仅限于USB-C，而大多数工作站的种类要多得多。 Precision 因此，5470的拥有者预计要依靠适配器或扩展坞来连接大多数设备。
SD卡阅读器
从我们的UHS-II测试卡来看，集成读卡器的传输速率非常快，接近230MB/s。然而，根据所涉及的文件大小，实际传输率可能会更低。移动1GB的图片（每张约4MB）的速度较慢，大约需要13秒。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD (AV PRO V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD (AV PRO V60) | |
沟通
英特尔AX211是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2连接的标准配置。虽然我们没有遇到明显的问题，但传输速率会比预期的要慢，而且变化较大。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
Dell Precision 5000 5470; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1049 (764-1342)
Dell Precision 5000 5470; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1304 (500-1450)
网络摄像头
网络摄像头仅限于100万像素或720p，而其他大多数笔记本电脑已经发展到200万像素，甚至500万像素，就像许多高端惠普笔记本电脑一样。 许多高端惠普笔记本电脑.图像质量很模糊，就像XPS 13系列上的网络摄像头。
红外线用于支持你好，但没有网络摄像头快门以保护隐私。
9.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
维护
底部面板由八个T5 Torx螺钉固定，便于拆卸。不过，由于内存和WLAN模块是焊接的，所以没有什么可升级的。
担保
美国的基本保修期只有12个月，而不是我们期待的大多数移动工作站和高端专业笔记本电脑的36个月。
输入设备
键盘
这款机型继承了老款产品的键盘。 XPS 13 9300或9310的设计。如果你以前在XPS 13上打过字，那么你就会知道在Precision 5470上应该期待什么。按键反馈均匀，行程适中，但惠普EliteBook或Firefly系列的按键在按下时往往更清晰或更尖锐。
触摸板
点击板的表面积与XPS 13 9300上的大致相同（10.8 x 6.7厘米对11.2 x 6.5厘米）。牵引力很平稳，只是在较慢的速度下稍有粘性，以便在需要时有更好的精度。在点击板上的反馈相对较软和浅，但与大多数其他笔记本电脑相比，有一个更安静的咔哒声。
显示屏 - 与Latitude 9430 2合1相同
Precision 5470与9430二合一电脑上的友达光电B140QAN IPS触摸屏一样，都是高质量的。 Latitude 9430二合一.因此，这两款机型共享类似的黑白响应时间、色域、对比度，甚至整体亮度。这款显示器对于希望获得全sRGB覆盖率和相对较深的黑色水平的用户来说是非常好的，但不幸的是，它遭受了明显的重影，如果处理涉及快速移动的图形或视频的应用，这可能是一个问题。
没有OLED、AdobeRGB或P3颜色或更高的刷新率选项可供选择，这意味着用户在目前所有的配置上都被限制在IPS和60赫兹。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B140QAN tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 537 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 518.4 cd/m² Minimum: 51.46 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 537 cd/m²
Contrast: 1627:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.88
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
78.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
79.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.06
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE N156HCA-EAC, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Precision 5000 5560 Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD MNE001EA1-5, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 14.00 | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA AU Optronics AUO068B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 InfoVision IVO8C78 (X140NVFC R0), IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -41% | 16% | 10% | -7% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 79.3 | 43.7 -45% | 94.9 20% | 96.8 22% | 70 -12% | 73.8 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 65.1 -35% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.5 0% | 99 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 78.7 | 45.3 -42% | 100 27% | 85.8 9% | 71.4 -9% | 75.5 -4% |
| Response Times | 11% | 8% | 8% | -7% | -19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52.4 ? | 48 ? 8% | 47.2 ? 10% | 52 ? 1% | 64.4 ? -23% | 54.8 ? -5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.4 ? | 28 ? 14% | 30.4 ? 6% | 28 ? 14% | 29.2 ? 10% | 43.2 ? -33% |
| PWM Frequency | 284.1 ? | |||||
| Screen | -116% | -24% | -19% | -10% | -27% | |
| Brightness middle | 537 | 305 -43% | 501.5 -7% | 512 -5% | 461 -14% | 934 74% |
| Brightness | 518 | 281 -46% | 467 -10% | 487 -6% | 439 -15% | 937 81% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 88 -6% | 83 -12% | 90 -4% | 89 -5% | 87 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.32 3% | 0.44 -33% | 0.35 -6% | 0.24 27% | 0.37 -12% |
| Contrast | 1627 | 953 -41% | 1140 -30% | 1463 -10% | 1921 18% | 2524 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.97 | 5.9 -99% | 4.73 -59% | 3.1 -4% | 2.6 12% | 4.7 -58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.33 | 20.1 -277% | 8.45 -59% | 8.4 -58% | 5.8 -9% | 10.5 -97% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.88 | 4.5 -411% | 0.51 42% | 0.4 55% | 1.1 -25% | 1.6 -82% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 5.3 -121% | 3.6 -50% | 5.5 -129% | 4.4 -83% | 7.1 -196% |
| Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.1 105% | 2.08 106% | 2.22 99% | 2.29 96% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 6668 97% | 6307 103% | 6447 101% | 6373 102% | 6478 100% | 6348 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.2 | 68.5 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.4 | 98.9 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -49% /
-82% | 0% /
-11% | -0% /
-9% | -8% /
-9% | -17% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器在开箱时就根据sRGB标准进行了很好的校准，其平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值分别为2.4和2.97。我们能够用X-Rite色度计将这些值进一步提高到<2，如下图的CalMan结果所示。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
该显示屏比大多数基于消费者的超极本更亮，以获得更好的户外可视性。尽管如此，许多HP EliteBook或 ZBook机型提供1000尼特的面板选项，在户外使用时明显更容易。戴尔还没有为其Precision 系列提供类似的亮度选项。
性能 - 酷睿i9 H系列CPU和独立GPU
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前，我们通过戴尔优化器软件将我们的设备设置为超性能模式。我们还通过Nvidia控制面板启用了独立的Nvidia GPU。请注意，同样的电源设置可以通过戴尔电源管理器或戴尔优化器进行配置。值得庆幸的是，在一个程序上进行电源配置文件的更改将自动改变另一个程序上的设置。
处理器
CPU性能是一个混合包。当与其他14英寸商务笔记本或工作站相比，Precision 5470提供了明显更快的性能，甚至与更大的工作站如 微星WE76或 惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8.这基本上是一个为较厚的笔记本电脑设计的CPU，被挤压到14英寸的外形尺寸。当与其他具有相同的笔记本电脑相比 Core i9-12900H然而，我们的Precision 中的处理器平均慢了约15%至20%。
该CPU的另一个缺点是其不稳定的时钟速率。例如，在循环运行CineBench R15 xT时，分数会在1500和2100分之间波动，正如我们的下图所示，这表明时钟速率在波动。相比之下，在惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8或微星Creator Z17上运行同样的测试时，不会出现这样的波动，每台电脑都有Core i9级CPU。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Dell Precision 5000 5470 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1847 (1355.47-2312.54)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1949 (1895.02-2129.93)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK: Ø2021 (1955.32-2192.14)
MSI Creator Z17 A12UGST-054 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2349 (2273.63-2626.4)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=26) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=26) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=26) | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1921, n=26) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=26) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=27) | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=26) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=26) | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=26) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=29) | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1892, n=29) | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=26) | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| MSI WE76 11UM-456 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen2-20VX000GGE | |
| Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 | |
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=26) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78172 - 111241, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=26) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=27) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
系统性能
与其他移动工作站相比，PCMark 10的结果高于预期。我们把这归功于第12代酷睿i9 H系列CPU和PCIe4 x4固态硬盘，这对14英寸工作站来说是相对不常见的选择。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6870 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=26) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=26) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-12900H (74.7 - 118.1, n=25) | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示，在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时有轻微的DPC问题，这在工作站上看到有点令人失望。在我们长达1分钟的视频测试中，4K播放在60FPS下是完美的，没有丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
戴尔提供256GB至4TB的PCIe3或PCIe4存储选项，并可选择自我加密。PCIe4的 三星PM9A1驱动器包括自己的铜质散热片，与没有SSD散热片的笔记本电脑相比，具有更好的持续性能，如 Latitude 7330.
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6817 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5086 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
448.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
395.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3790 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3105 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
73.28 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
153.8 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Dell Precision 5000 5470: Ø6727 (6305.27-6765.93)
GPU性能 - 40 W RTX A1000图形
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU (14402 - 15867, n=2) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA | |
| Dell Precision 3000 3551 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU (10914 - 11728, n=2) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA | |
| Dell Precision 3000 3551 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU (4101 - 4410, n=2) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE | |
| HP ZBook Power 15 G8 313S5EA | |
| HP ZBook Firefly 15 G8 2C9R7EA | |
| Dell Precision 3000 3551 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
| 2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
| HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU (304 - 2649, n=2) | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5560 | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 15198 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 40266 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10123 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4558 points | |
Help | ||
The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 | |
| Average NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU () | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU: Ø41.4 (37-44)
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 168 | 159.8 | 113.7 | 58.9 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 244.1 | 147.5 | 82.1 | 42.7 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160.8 | 147.9 | 112.3 | 132.1 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 105.3 | 59.1 | 43 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 118.7 | 94.8 | 76.3 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 242 | 106.2 | 84.7 | 72.8 | |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 111 | 53.3 | 39.3 | 31.2 | 23.6 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 110.4 | 68.4 | 42.6 | 31.3 | 18.8 |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 161.5 | 106.5 | 63.9 | 46.8 | 31.1 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 82 | 68 | 58 | 48 | 38 |
| Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 75 | 62 | 54 | 26 | 17 |
| Dirt 5 (2020) | 135 | 62.4 | 48.5 | 37.2 | 25.8 |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 103 | 50 | 33 | 25 | 22 |
| Hitman 3 (2021) | 171.9 | 83.7 | 71.3 | 66.1 | 41 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 195 | 127 | 103 | 54 | 34 |
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 103 | 64 | 54 | ||
| Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 92 | 64 | 64 | 61 | 37 |
| God of War (2022) | 60.2 | 49.1 | 40.9 | 25.8 | 20.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 61.3 | 50.4 | 36.7 | 29 | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 112 | 107 | 76 | 22 | 13 |
排放
系统噪音 - 负载下声音大
Precision 5470的运行声音比较大的 Precision 5560负载时的噪音。例如，在超性能模式下运行 Witcher 3例如，在超性能模式下运行，将导致风扇噪音略低于49 dB(A)，而15.6英寸的Precision ，只有40 dB(A)。事实上，Precision 5470很容易成为14英寸小型工作站中噪音最大的机型之一。
当在平衡模式而不是超性能模式下运行重负荷时，系统变得更加安静，为40.3 dB(A)。如上所述，你会失去一些CPU性能，但根据环境的不同，更安静的风扇可能值得折衷。
如果设置为超性能模式，即使只是在桌面上闲置，内部风扇也会周期性地脉冲，似乎没有任何理由。如果运行要求不高的应用程序，建议使用平衡模式或静音模式。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 48.5 / 50.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE T1200 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G | Dell Precision 5000 5560 RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD Vega 8, R7 PRO 5850U, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X081N | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA T500 Laptop GPU, i7-1165G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 Quadro P520, i7-10610U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 11% | 8% | -4% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 23 | 25.21 -10% | 23.4 -2% | 24.04 -5% | 28.7 -25% | 29.7 -29% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.3 | 25.21 -8% | 23.6 -1% | 24.04 -3% | 28.7 -23% | 29.7 -27% |
| Idle Average * | 23.3 | 25.21 -8% | 23.6 -1% | 24.04 -3% | 28.7 -23% | 29.7 -27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.3 | 25.21 -8% | 23.6 -1% | 24.04 -3% | 28.7 -23% | 30.4 -30% |
| Load Average * | 48.5 | 39.09 19% | 25.8 47% | 28.19 42% | 34 30% | 33.1 32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.6 | 36.6 25% | 40.1 17% | 40.1 17% | 35.3 27% | |
| Load Maximum * | 50.4 | 43.53 14% | 41.4 18% | 40.77 19% | 40.1 20% | 37.9 25% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
考虑到酷睿H级CPU、独立的Nvidia GPU和小机箱尺寸，表面温度比预期的要低。其他14英寸工作站，如ZBook Firefly 14 G8或ThinkPad P14s G2，都配备了较慢的CPU，但它们的温度会变得更高，热点达到49℃，而我们的Precision 。尽管如此，键盘中心仍然可以在42摄氏度时变得相当热。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA T1200 Laptop GPU | Dell Precision 5000 5560 Intel Core i7-11850H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 Intel Core i7-10610U, NVIDIA Quadro P520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | -10% | 1% | 5% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 41.8 | 53.8 -29% | 48.2 -15% | 42.8 -2% | 42.6 -2% | 52.3 -25% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 36 | 52.1 -45% | 42.6 -18% | 47.5 -32% | 49.4 -37% | 60.9 -69% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34.6 | 27.6 20% | 34.8 -1% | 27 22% | 24.2 30% | 23.1 33% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.6 | 27.7 18% | 35.2 -5% | 28.3 16% | 24.6 27% | 23 32% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试--循环的CPU时钟速率
启动Prime95会导致CPU时钟速率、电路板功耗和核心温度分别飙升至3.6 GHz、91 W和101 C。然而，仅仅几秒钟后，时钟频率、功耗和温度将开始在1.0至2.4 GHz、20至50 W和61至82 C之间分别循环变化。这种循环行为与我们上面的CineBency R15 xT循环测试结果一致，表明Precision 5470无法长时间保持稳定的Turbo Boost时钟速率。在这么小的机箱中运行Core i9-12900H CPU以发挥其最大潜力仍然是一个梦想。
当运行 Witcher 3代表高处理负荷时，CPU和GPU将分别稳定在82摄氏度和71摄氏度，而在Precision 5560上为69摄氏度和75摄氏度。
用电池供电运行限制了CPU的性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试将返回物理和图形分数，分别为21067和10542分，而在主电源上则为27514和10914分。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 54 | 53 |
| Prime95压力 | 1.0 - 2.4 | - | 61 - 80 | ~61 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.1 | 1027 | 67 | 68 |
| Witcher 3 应力 | 1.0 | 1387 | 82 | 71 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Precision 5000 5470 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量--一个要求苛刻的小机器
在最低亮度设置和电源配置文件下，桌面上的空转只需要4.3瓦，而最大亮度设置和电源配置文件下的dGPU激活需要近19瓦。 Precision 5560装备更快的RTX A2000 GPU，但i7-11850H CPU较慢。该系统通常比其他14英寸工作站要求更高，这也是其更快的内部硬件所预期的。
在运行Prim95时，我们能够从中小型（约14.3 x 6.5 x 2.2厘米）的130瓦USB-C交流适配器中记录到近138瓦的最大电流。如下面的截图所示，由于冷却解决方案的热限制，这个速率只是暂时的。功耗曲线的形状与我们在上面观察到的时钟速率和电路板功耗密切相关。
请注意，没有独立RTX A1000 GPU的SKU将配备一个较小的90 W USB-C交流适配器，而不是较大的130 W。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.55 / 1.08 Watt |
| Idle | 4.3 / 8.9 / 18.9 Watt |
| Load |
94 / 137.5 Watt |
   
| |
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.60 | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD R7 PRO 5850U, Vega 8, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X081N, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 14.00 | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA i7-1165G7, T500 Laptop GPU, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 i7-10610U, Quadro P520, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | -22% | 35% | 40% | 30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 5.96 -39% | 6.2 -44% | 4.49 -4% | 3.1 28% | 3.3 23% |
| Idle Average * | 8.9 | 8.37 6% | 13.9 -56% | 9.62 -8% | 4.7 47% | 9.3 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 18.9 | 9.05 52% | 23.8 -26% | 10.24 46% | 8.6 54% | 12.1 36% |
| Load Average * | 94 | 91.82 2% | 95.7 -2% | 31.56 66% | 64.8 31% | 59.4 37% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 83.2 | 102 -23% | 87 -5% | 43.7 47% | 59.6 28% | 52.7 37% |
| Load Maximum * | 137.5 | 126.38 8% | 132.6 4% | 52.37 62% | 68.5 50% | 69.4 50% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø83.2 (77.2-122)
Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.7 (82.8-137.5)
Power Consumption external Monitor
Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø52 (41-137.5)
Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø100.6 (86.1-124)
Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø63.9 (57.8-69.7)
Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø79.8 (74.7-101.1)
电池寿命
对于一个超薄的14英寸笔记本电脑来说，电池容量是比较大的，为72Wh。在充满电的情况下，WLAN运行时间刚刚超过9.5小时，这比我们在较慢的酷睿U系列动力的惠普ZBook Firefly 14 G8上记录的时间短了几个小时。
从空电到满电大约需要2小时。
| Dell Precision 5000 5470 i9-12900H, RTX A1000 Laptop GPU, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P15v G2 21A9000XGE i7-11800H, T1200 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Dell Precision 5000 5560 i7-11850H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD R7 PRO 5850U, Vega 8, 50 Wh | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G8 2C9Q2EA i7-1165G7, T500 Laptop GPU, 53 Wh | HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 i7-10610U, Quadro P520, 53 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -6% | 8% | 10% | 171% | 23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 883 | 1029 17% | 722 -18% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 573 | 452 -21% | 380 -34% | 498 -13% | 770 34% | 608 6% |
| Load | 63 | 54 -14% | 110 75% | 83 32% | 257 308% | 88 40% |
| H.264 | 482 | 637 | 752 |
Pros
+ 就尺寸而言，CPU性能非常高
+ 独立的Nvidia Quadro选项
+ 高达64GB的内存（焊接）。
+ 紧凑的外形尺寸
+ 全sRGB覆盖
Cons
- 没有AdobeRGB或P3颜色、USB-A、HDMI、Xeon或ECC内存选项
- 颗粒状的720p网络摄像头，没有隐私快门
- 在压力下，CPU的性能循环往复
- 基本保修期只有12个月
- 负载时非常响亮
Verdict — Uber Powerful Without The Uber Size
Precision 5470可以说是一个轻薄的工作站，拥有厚重的游戏笔记本的处理器。你不会再找到另一台如此紧凑的14英寸工作站，拥有与这台戴尔相同的酷睿i9-12900H CPU，甚至是独立的Nvidia RTX GPU。如果你想在保持重量和尺寸尽可能低的同时最大限度地提高性能，那么Precision 5470可能值得考虑。
Precision
5470比它的小尺寸所显示的更快、更强大。如果你想在14英寸的小尺寸上保持尽可能高的性能，这就是要买的工作站型号。
不幸的是，在性能方面，该系统有点过于雄心勃勃。它的酷睿i9-12900H与其他采用相同CPU的笔记本电脑相比，表现不佳。它的速度相对于其他14英寸工作站但它绝对可以更快。鉴于我们审查期间不理想的时钟频率波动，我们对酷睿i9-12900HK SKU比我们的酷睿i9-12900H的实际表现能好多少表示担忧。同时，尽管RTX A1000的名字里有RTX，但它的光线追踪潜力很差，就像我们对A1000所基于的GeForce RTX 3050的观察。
苛刻的第12代H系列CPU直接导致了Precision 5470相对响亮的风扇噪音和高耗电量。它的外观和感觉可能是一台14英寸的笔记本电脑，但它的声音有时绝对会像一台游戏笔记本电脑。这个缺点在小型高性能笔记本电脑上很常见。
价格和可用性
Precision 5470现在已经通过在线经销商广泛发售，如Newegg 或 亚马逊 尽管只有有限的FHD配置，价格从2000美元到2300美元不等。而用户可以直接从戴尔购买https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/workstations-isv-certified/precision-5470-workstation/spd/precision-14-5470-laptop/他们将有更多可配置的选项可供选择。
Dell Precision 5000 5470
-
09/16/2022 v7
Allen Ngo
Workstation - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
