关于 vivo X300 的评价
vivo X300 是一款功能强大、装备精良的智能手机。尤其是全新的 200 百万像素蔡司相机，可提供真正强大的效果。即将推出的Galaxy S26 要想跟上它的步伐，还需付出艰苦的努力。Dimensity 9500 也提供了真正的旗舰级性能，尽管这款小巧的 vivo 手机很可能会因发热而导致节流。
如果用户希望在紧凑型手机中找到一款主打拍照、拥有众多高端功能和特别明亮的 OLED 面板的旗舰产品，那么 vivo X300 将是 Oppo Find X9 或小米 17 等机型的绝佳替代品。不过，电池续航能力明显较弱，至少欧洲版本的电池容量有所降低。
Pros
Cons
vivo X300 的价格和上市时间
vivo X300 的规格
机身和功能 - 防水Android 手机，配备可拆卸蔡司镜头
vivo X300 的显示屏对角线为 6.31 英寸，重量为 190 克，比 X300 Pro 更为小巧。 X300 Pro的继任者。 X200 Pro Mini.其制造质量非常好，由于通过了 IP68/69 认证，机身不仅防水防尘，而且给人感觉非常高档。
OLED 面板的屏占比高达 90.5%，几乎覆盖了整个正面，使设计更具现代感。作为机身的延伸，X300 还支持 蔡司远摄扩展套件.
功能包括 USB OTG、蓝牙 6.0、NFC 芯片和支持显示输出的快速 USB 3.2 端口。
通信和操作 -Android 配备 Wi-Fi 7 和 5G 功能的智能手机
vivo X300 支持快速 Wi-Fi 7，包括 6 GHz 频段。我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器测得的传输速率非常快且稳定。移动数据使用的频率范围也很广，涵盖了所有现代蜂窝标准。vivo 智能手机支持双卡双待，可使用两张 nano-SIM 卡或两张 eSIM 卡。
在定位方面，X300 提供全球卫星导航网络的双频连接。
生物识别安全由集成在显示屏中的超声波指纹传感器处理，该传感器运行快速、可靠。OLED 面板对输入的响应也非常迅速，整体系统性能卓越。线性振动电机可提供愉悦的触觉反馈。
| Networking | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
软件和可持续发展 - 高级手机，Android 16
vivo 手机采用无塑料外包装盒，但仍使用铝箔收缩包装。包装上提供了某些关键原材料的可持续发展的一般信息，但没有披露二氧化碳足迹的具体细节。根据 EPREL 数据库，该设备的可修复性评级为 C。
与 X200 FE不同的是，vivo X300 在欧洲不再使用 Funtouch 界面，而是使用 OriginOS。因此，这款小巧的智能手机拥有现代的外观、五年的操作系统更新、七年的安全更新以及 vivo 内部的人工智能工具。
相机 -Android 带蔡司镜头的手机
蔡司相机系统是 vivo X300 的一大亮点。对于一款结构紧凑的手机来说，全新的 2 亿像素主摄像头可提供非常出色的照片质量。虽然传感器相对较小，只有 1/1.4 英寸，但弱光拍摄也令人信服，细节清晰，图像平滑度也在可控范围内。
相比之下，无论是 5000 万像素长焦镜头还是 5000 万像素超广角摄像头，在质量上都无法与之相提并论。不过，它们的拍摄效果肯定不会落后于那些 紧凑型竞争产品.相反，X300 的广角照片给我们留下了特别深刻的印象。
视频性能也令人信服，因为 X300 支持 4K120 拍摄模式，甚至可以与 HDR 相结合。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightZoom 5xUltraweitwinkel
显示屏 - vivo 高端手机采用 LTPO OLED 显示屏
X300 的 LTPO AMOLED 面板分辨率非常高，达到 1216p 和 446 ppi，支持 1 Hz 到 120 Hz 的可变刷新率。根据 vivo 的说法，HDR 峰值亮度为 4,500 尼特，但在我们的测试中，每平方米的亮度仅为 4,072 cd。在更逼真的 APL18 模式下，最大亮度也非常不错，为每平方米 2,386 cd。
vivo 为其小巧的智能手机配备了 PWM 调光功能，频率为 2,160 Hz，我们在测量中证实了这一点。此外，我们测得的基本闪烁频率为 360 赫兹。
在 sRGB 色彩空间中，X300 的平均 Delta E 偏差也非常低，这也是我们在使用光度计和 Calman 软件进行分析时发现的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1537 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
CCT: 6754 K
| Vivo X300 AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy S25+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Oppo Find X9 AMOLED, 2760x1256, 6.6" | Xiaomi 15T Pro AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -29% | 11% | -13% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1537 | 1371 -11% | 1132 -26% | 1064 -31% | 1099 -28% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1523 | 1370 -10% | 1114 -27% | 1069 -30% | 1067 -30% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 96 | 96 0% | 97 1% | 99 3% | 95 -1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 2.7 -93% | 0.82 41% | 1.3 7% | 1.05 25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 4.2 -62% | 1.95 25% | 3.4 -31% | 2.38 8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2 5% | 1 52% | 2 5% | 1.7 19% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.03 108% | 2.244 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.232 99% |
| CCT | 6754 96% | 6450 101% | 6546 99% | 6578 99% | 6779 96% |
* ... smaller is better
| Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 360 Hz Amplitude: 12.85 % Secondary Frequency: 2127 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8098 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.77 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4105 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3565 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.75 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.384 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3635 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航时间--配备大容量电池的强大智能手机
虽然 vivo X300 在 Geekbench 中的得分略低于 OPPO Find X9在 Geekbench 中的得分略低于 OPPO Find X9，但这款高阶智能手机仍能提供真正的旗舰性能，这要归功于它搭载的 联发科 Dimensity 9500.在日常使用中，系统运行无延迟，感觉非常流畅。
X300 在 GFXBench 基准测试的图形测试中表现非常出色。帧速率超过 60 fps，Mali-G1 Ultra 图形处理器的 Mali-G1 Ultra达到最高值。不过，3DMark 压力测试也显示出明显的节流现象。在这些情况下，vivo 智能手机的性能有时会降低 50%以上。
虽然电池容量只有 5,360 mAh，但在我们的电池测试中，X300 仍然实现了超长的运行时间。该设备可通过 USB-C 接口以高达 90 瓦的功率充电，或以 40 瓦的功率进行无线充电。有线充电只需不到一小时即可充满电池。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (236 - 362, n=3) | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 469, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Vivo X300 | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Oppo Find X9 | Xiaomi 15T Pro | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | Average 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 27% | -10% | 21% | 60% | 24% | -15% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2056.87 | 4057.35 97% | 3232.3 57% | 3219.93 57% | 3971.4 93% | 3246 ? 58% | 2228 ? 8% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1997.76 | 3311.02 66% | 1565.8 -22% | 3593.03 80% | 3899.9 95% | 2829 ? 42% | 1852 ? -7% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 332.61 | 294.51 -11% | 335.7 1% | 426.1 28% | 548.4 65% | 368 ? 11% | 296 ? -11% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 654.09 | 351.16 -46% | 172.6 -74% | 110.46 -83% | 561.3 -14% | 556 ? -15% | 339 ? -48% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
Vivo X300 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Vivo X300 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
| Oppo Find X9 | |
| Xiaomi 15T Pro | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
vivo X300 是一款一流的紧凑型智能手机，配备了强大的蔡司相机，不过其在欧洲的定价可能有些过高。
Vivo X300
- 12/23/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 88%  | Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 2. $6.91 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V... 3. $6.91 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V... List Price: 1049€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED |
2. 88.4%  | Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25... 2. $799.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Edge Phon... 3. $1,144.95 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-... List Price: 1149 Euro | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
3. 86.1%  | Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 2. $9.11 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for O... 3. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... List Price: 999€ | 203 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.59" 2760x1256 460 PPI AMOLED |
4. 86.1%  | Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $11.99 Ibywind for Xiaomi 15T Pro 5... 2. $6.59 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for... 3. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi 15T Pro S... List Price: 1000€ | 210 g | 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
5. 89%  | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $8.19 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Glass Screen... 2. $9.90 Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi... 3. $13.59 iPhone 17 Pro Max Charger Fa... List Price: 940€ | 219 g | 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
