Oppo Find X9 智能手机评测--低于 900 美元的高端手机，但存在 SoC 问题

Name: Oppo Find X9
Brand: Oppo

小兄弟还是大对手？

从纸面上看，Oppo Find X9 与 Pro 机型相比几乎没有任何妥协，而且仍然是一款略微紧凑的手机。价格差异也很大。但摄像头和电池的差异真的那么小吗？
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/30/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone

结论 - Oppo Find X9

Oppo Find X9 在许多方面都比较出色，拥有快速的 SoC、明亮的高分辨率屏幕、出色的摄像头和强劲的扬声器。

输入异常流畅，软件也是最新的。它承诺六年内更新，Wi-Fi 网速很快，是一款几乎可以在全球任何地方使用的智能手机。

不过，它也有一些缺点，比如在持续负载情况下系统会出现明显的节流现象，基准测试结果通常也没有你预期的那么高。此外，长时间使用后，手机外壳会变得很热，而且与顶级设备相比，相机图像缺乏最后的品质感。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Oppo Find X9 的价格相对较低，是一款速度快、电池续航时间长的智能手机，如果你能接受小的妥协的话。

Pros

+ 售价低于 900 美元

+ 明亮、清晰的 AMOLED 显示屏

+ 电池续航时间长

+ 主摄像头质量好

+ 快速 Wi-Fi

+ 广泛的 4G/5G 频率覆盖

+ 带 DisplayPort 的 USB 3.2

+ 支持 eSIM 卡

+ 高质量、坚固耐用的外壳

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 六年更新保证

Cons

- 负载下严重节流

- 内存控制器限制速度

- 发热会让人不舒服

- 无 8K 视频

- 无 UWB 模块

- 屏幕保护膜质量一般

- 扭动时发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音

- PWM 闪烁

价格和可用性

Oppo Find X9 目前在amazon.uk 上的售价为 799 英镑。.

结论 - Oppo Find X9
规格
机箱 - 稳定的机箱，纤薄的边框
功能 - 最高 16GB 内存
软件 - 尖端安全
通信 - WiFi 7 和全球移动通信
电话功能和语音质量 - 清晰响亮
照相机 - 不算顶级
输入设备和操作 - 带可分配按键
显示屏 - 快速明亮的 AMOLED
性能 - 快速，但有问题
排放物 - 可能会发热
电池续航时间 - Oppo 配备了大容量电池
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品比较

规格

Oppo Find X9

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 9500 8 x 2.7 - 4.2 GHz, Cortex-X930 Travis / Cortex-A730 6x Gelas

Graphics adapter

Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.59 inch 20:9, 2760 x 1256 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 7i, 240 Hz sample rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 498 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, gyroscope, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n75/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 157 x 73.9

Battery

7025 mAh Lithium-Ion, 80W charging, 50W wireless charging

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.6, phase shift AF, Laser AF, OIS, Quad LED flash, Videos @2160p/120fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/2.0, phase shift AF, wide angle (Camera 2); 50.0MP, f/2.6, phase shift AF, OIS, 3x optical zoom, periscope tele (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4, Videos @2160p/60fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB cable, SIM tool, USB OTG dongle, 24 Months Warranty, IP68/IP69 certified, fanless, waterproof

Weight

203 g

Price

999 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

机箱 - 稳定的机箱，纤薄的边框

纤薄的屏幕边框和 91% 的屏占比让人一眼就能看出 Oppo Find X9 是一款高端智能手机。不过，正面屏幕采用了大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护，这种玻璃目前也常见于更便宜的中端手机，如小米 Poco X7 Pro.

颜色有灰色、黑色或天鹅绒红，但在欧洲，灰色机型几乎是唯一的选择。这款手机的设计非常简洁，拥有圆润的边角和可防指纹的磨砂背面。

手机可以说是坚固耐用，但用手用力时会产生轻微的吱吱声。机身防水防尘等级达到 IP68/IP69 标准。

尺寸比较

功能 - 最高 16GB 内存

此外，还配备了数据吞吐量达 5 Gbps 的高速 USB 3.2 端口和 DisplayPort，以及 NFC。蓝牙 6.0 允许对设备进行定位跟踪，尽管 UWB 并未搭载。

国际上提供以下存储选项：

256 GB UFS 4.1 闪存、12 GB LPDDR5X 内存
512 GB UFS 4.1 闪存、12 GB LPDDR5X 内存
512 GB UFS 4.1 闪存、16 GB LPDDR5X 内存

在欧洲，目前只提供 512 GB 版本。

欧洲机型可以顺利使用 eSIM 卡。不过，没有用于存储扩展的 microSD 卡插槽。

软件 - 尖端安全

OPPO 使用自己的 ColorOS 界面，该界面基于Android 16。安全补丁是从 2025 年 11 月 1 日开始的，这意味着在审查时它们是最新的。更新计划将持续六年。

预装的应用程序包括图库和大量人工智能编辑选项，以及视频播放器。

可持续性

OPPO 已在欧盟的 EPREL 数据库中注册了其智能手机，OPPO Find X9 的维修手册和备件也已提供。

除此之外，可持续发展方面的信息很少：我们无法找到碳足迹或回收率。

通信 - WiFi 7 和全球移动通信

Oppo Find X9 支持 WiFi 7，这是目前最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中，这款手机实现了良好的数据传输速度。这些速度在上游方向相当稳定，但在下游方向，最高速度下降达 20%。

在移动网络覆盖方面，Oppo Find X9 几乎可以在全球任何地方使用。正如我们在测试阶段的抽查中观察到的那样，即使在具有挑战性的情况下，接收效果也很好。

Networking
Oppo Find X9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1070 (min: 931) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1574 (min: 1254) MBit/s ∼95%
OnePlus 15 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	536 (min: 375) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1401 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼84%
Oppo Find X9 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	932 (min: 738) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1461 (min: 1265) MBit/s ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼73%
Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	777 (min: 620) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1592 (min: 1420) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1020 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1658 (min: 1579) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	937 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1088 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1258 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1445 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	714 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	742 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1337 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1399 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼84%

Oppo Find X9; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1070 (931-1142)

Oppo Find X9; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1574 (1254-1749)

电话功能和语音质量 - 清晰响亮

在一次测试通话中，接收器的声音听起来非常清晰，通过听筒很容易就能听懂。我们的声音也传输得很清楚。免提模式也是如此，不过我们希望在这方面能有更好的噪音过滤效果。

照相机 - 不算顶级

与 OPPO Find X9 Pro最明显的差异体现在相机上：除了没有虚化传感器外，所有镜头的感光度都略低于同类产品，有些镜头的分辨率也较低。

总之，我们喜欢主摄像头提供的图像，尽管植物的渲染在某些地方显得有些平淡。不过，细节水平始终很高，弱光下的动态范围也不错。

虽然无法进行 8K 视频录制，但可以进行高达 120 帧/秒的 4K 视频录制，从而实现慢动作效果。视频质量很高，尤其是清晰度给我们留下了深刻印象。

与主摄像头相比，长焦镜头具有潜望镜变焦功能，可提供 6 倍光学变焦。即使以稍高的变焦水平拍摄的图像也非常可用。

前置摄像头最大分辨率为 3200 万像素，自拍效果不错。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Plant Environment Low light Wide-angle camera

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

输入设备和操作 - 带可分配按键

屏幕的触摸采样率为 240 Hz，最大刷新率为 120 Hz。由于处理速度极快，因此输入感觉非常直接。

在设备的左侧，你可以找到所谓的 "快拍键"，它可以配置为相机快门按钮。此外，它还可以用来启动手电筒等。

指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕下方。它的位置很高，但在测试中却证明了其出人意料的实用性：你无需调整手的位置，即使手小的用户也能轻松触及。

通过面部识别可以解锁设备，但只能使用前置摄像头的 2D 方法。

显示屏 - 快速明亮的 AMOLED

AMOLED 屏幕采用 LTPO 技术，这意味着它可以根据需要自动将刷新率调整到 1 到 120 赫兹之间。例如，这可以在阅读文件时节省能耗。

最大亮度为 1,132 cd/m²，与同类其他屏幕相当。在较小的区域，可以达到 1,975 cd/m²，而在 HDR 模式下，该设备在特定区域的亮度甚至可以超过 3,000 cd/m²。

不过，我们确实观察到 PWM 闪烁频率相当高，达到 474 Hz。因此，对闪烁敏感的用户应在购买前对屏幕进行测试，因为个人对不同屏幕的反应会有所不同。


1108 cd/m²	1112 cd/m²	1113 cd/m²
1120 cd/m²	1132 cd/m²	1122 cd/m²
1116 cd/m²	1102 cd/m²	1105 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1132 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1114.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1132 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.82 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.244
CCT: 6546 K

	Oppo Find X9 AMOLED, 2760x1256, 6.6"	OnePlus 15 AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"	Oppo Find X9 Pro LTPO AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Apple iPhone 17 OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"
Screen		-30%	-15%	-67%	-27%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1132	1114 -2%	1105 -2%	1371 21%	1138 1%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1114	1109 0%	1084 -3%	1370 23%	1127 1%
Brightness Distribution (%)	97	97 0%	95 -2%	96 -1%	96 -1%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.82	1.33 -62%	1.02 -24%	2.7 -229%	1.07 -30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.95	2.42 -24%	2.32 -19%	4.2 -115%	2.99 -53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1	1.9 -90%	1.4 -40%	2 -100%	1.8 -80%
Gamma	2.244 ^98%	2.273 ^97%	2.244 ^98%	2.03 ^108%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6546 ^99%	6708 ^97%	6411 ^101%	6450 ^101%	6516 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

474.4 Hz
Amplitude: 10 %

The display backlight flickers at 474.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 474.4 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8142 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

OPPO 实现了良好的显示屏校准，因此与最佳色彩空间的偏差非常小。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.4 ms rise
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.8 ms rise
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

明亮的屏幕即使在明亮的环境中也能轻松阅读，即使在大视角下也能保持稳定。

性能 - 快速，但有问题

联发科联发科 Dimensity 9500是目前速度最快的 SoC 之一。然而，从 Find X9 Pro中看到的那样，在将这一性能转化为实际使用时存在明显的问题。

Oppo Find X9 略微紧凑的设计可能会使散热变得更具挑战性，这使它无法在每个基准测试中与其他顶级手机保持一致。

尽管如此，这种差异在日常使用中并不明显：在我们的测试中，每个应用程序都运行得非常流畅。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	3732 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3508 - 3635, n=3)	3551 Points +1%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	3511 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	3508 Points
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3498 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3136 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=212, last 2 years)	1757 Points -50%
Multi-Core
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	10645 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (10378 - 10941, n=3)	10575 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	10405 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10378 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10029 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	9456 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=212, last 2 years)	5136 Points -51%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	2981365 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (2857236 - 2981365, n=2)	2919301 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2857236 Points
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2456231 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2271821 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	2158729 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=153, last 2 years)	1489025 Points -48%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20673 Points +48%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19802 Points +42%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=189, last 2 years)	14843 Points +6%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	13977 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (13954 - 13977, n=2)	13966 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	13954 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2309 Points
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1698 Points
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=129, last 2 years)	1145 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	13223 Points +23%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	13002 Points +21%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10756 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (10744 - 10756, n=2)	10750 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	10744 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=148, last 2 years)	7716 Points -28%
System
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	19202 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17481 Points +13%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	15554 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (15499 - 15554, n=2)	15527 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	15499 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=148, last 2 years)	11468 Points -26%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	16264 Points +94%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	15236 Points +82%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=148, last 2 years)	8740 Points +4%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	8364 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (8243 - 8364, n=2)	8304 Points -1%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	8243 Points -1%
Graphics
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	52659 Points +8%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	48863 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (48852 - 48863, n=2)	48858 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	48852 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	45691 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)	26203 Points -46%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2353 Points +12%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2221 Points +6%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	2109 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (2105 - 2109, n=2)	2107 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2105 Points
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2468, n=148, last 2 years)	1705 Points -19%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	23141 Points +35%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	22665 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=137, last 2 years)	20068 Points +17%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	17121 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (16866 - 17121, n=2)	16994 Points -1%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	16866 Points -1%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35717 Points
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=126, last 2 years)	27415 Points
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1915 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1891 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	4677 Points +2362%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=52, last 2 years)	841 Points +343%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	655 Points +245%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	192 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (190 - 192, n=2)	191 Points +1%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	190 Points
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35502 Points +19623%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=52, last 2 years)	3851 Points +2039%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	502 Points +179%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	180 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (176 - 180, n=2)	178 Points -1%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	176 Points -2%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	48896 Points +11219%
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=52, last 2 years)	5504 Points +1174%
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1023 Points +137%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	436 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (432 - 436, n=2)	434 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	432 Points

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=43, last 2 years)	884 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	245 Points
Score V6
OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	11212 Points +1360%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10534 Points +1272%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22149, n=73, last 2 years)	4497 Points +486%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	768 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (765 - 768, n=2)	767 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	765 Points 0%

即使在 GPU 性能方面，Oppo Find X9 的基准测试结果也不尽如人意。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7198 Points +54%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6985 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6885 Points +47%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	4904 Points +5%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4678 Points

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7167 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7029 Points +12%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6969 Points +11%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6251 Points
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	5022 Points -20%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26616 Points +1%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26389 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25978 Points -2%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25885 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	21785 Points -17%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14788 Points +54%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12546 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12400 Points +29%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10197 Points +6%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9619 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14635 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12747 Points +31%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	12559 Points +29%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10389 Points +7%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9739 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3198 Points +1%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3163 Points
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2886 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2525 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2124 Points -33%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3211 Points +21%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2871 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2698 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2650 Points
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2197 Points -17%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +97%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	954 fps +26%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	762 fps +1%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	755 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	697 fps -8%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	534.3 fps -29%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +97%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	606 fps +60%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	458 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	450 fps +19%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	378 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	338.5 fps -10%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +97%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	369 fps +30%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	340 fps +20%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	284 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	283 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	230 fps -19%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +97%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	205 fps +34%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	199 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	178 fps +16%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	164.8 fps +8%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	153 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +97%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	109 fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps +49%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	92 fps +28%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	69.8 fps -3%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +97%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -2%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	287 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	286 fps +36%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	233 fps +10%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	211 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	202.5 fps -4%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +27%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	48 fps +17%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	44 fps +7%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	41 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	29.6 fps -28%

总的来说，上网冲浪是一种流畅的体验，但这方面的基准测试结果也低于平均水平。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	335.933 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	334.386 Points +82%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	184.1 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 (Chrome 142)	184.083 Points
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=153, last 2 years)	155.6 Points -15%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	146.211 Points -21%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	603 runs/min
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	599 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	446 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=129, last 2 years)	225 runs/min

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	39.6 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	29 runs/min
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	21.3 runs/min
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	17.9 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	17.9 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=124, last 2 years)	14.4 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	290 Points +110%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	243 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	239 Points +73%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years)	147.9 Points +7%
Oppo Find X9 (Chrome 142)	138 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (129 - 138, n=2)	133.5 Points -3%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	129 Points -7%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	110696 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	98817 Points +54%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	98523 Points +54%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	74649 Points +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (64064 - 74649, n=2)	69357 Points +8%
Oppo Find X9 (Chrome 142)	64064 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=201, last 2 years)	49162 Points -23%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years)	1147 ms * -132%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	503.8 ms * -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (495 - 504, n=2)	499 ms * -1%
Oppo Find X9 (Chrome 142)	494.9 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	388.7 ms * +21%
OnePlus 15 (Chrome 142)	315.6 ms * +36%
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	263.1 ms * +47%

* ... smaller is better

内存控制器无法充分利用快如闪电的 UFS 4.1 闪存功能。尽管如此，还是可以实现快速文件传输和相对较短的加载时间。

	Oppo Find X9	OnePlus 15	Oppo Find X9 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S25+	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		65%	-2%	57%	69%	18%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3232.3	3962.2 23%	3219.8 0%	4057.35 26%	3789 ?(1954 - 4110, n=21) 17%	2242 ?(270 - 4370, n=194, last 2 years) -31%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1565.8	3741.2 139%	1239.76 -21%	3311.02 111%	3201 ?(1240 - 4035, n=21) 104%	1850 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=194, last 2 years) 18%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	335.7	352.6 5%	367.54 9%	294.51 -12%	377 ?(279 - 576, n=21) 12%	296 ?(47.6 - 576, n=194, last 2 years) -12%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	172.6	334.4 94%	176.98 3%	351.16 103%	422 ?(48.2 - 678, n=21) 144%	336 ?(9.4 - 964, n=194, last 2 years) 95%

排放物 - 可能会发热

温度

长时间使用后，Oppo Find X9 会变得非常热。例如，我们测得的温度高达 48.2 °C。这一点非常明显，甚至会让人感觉不舒服。

3DMark 压力测试也揭示了低基准分数的可能原因：在多次基准测试运行后，性能下降达 50%，尤其是在要求较高的计算过程中。目前几乎所有的高端手机都在一定程度上存在这个问题。

Max. Load

Idle


47 °C	46.1 °C	42.8 °C
47.4 °C	46.1 °C	42.2 °C
48.2 °C	46.7 °C	43.4 °C

Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 45.5 °C


40.1 °C	41.2 °C	44.2 °C
40.8 °C	42.3 °C	41.9 °C
40.8 °C	42.3 °C	47 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 42.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.9 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	99.6 % +12%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	96.8 % +8%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	89.3 %
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61.9 % -31%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.4 % -40%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	74.3 %
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % -12%
OnePlus 15 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	52 % -30%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.3 % -31%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	38.7 % -48%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	66.1 % +34%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.9 % +19%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	49.3 %
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	20.6 % -58%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.5 % +34%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % +32%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	49.7 %
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	42.4 % -15%

Oppo Find X9; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø22.5 (21.8-29.3)

Oppo Find X9; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø74.6 (69.4-77.7)

Oppo Find X9; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø32.1 (24-48.7)

Oppo Find X9; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø16.3 (12-24.2)

发言人

底部边缘的扬声器由耳机支持。82.3 dB(A)的最大音量并没有打破记录，但对于一个中等大小的房间来说已经足够。

声音提供了一些深沉的中音，听流行歌曲也是一种享受。

如果希望获得更好的音效，可以选择通过蓝牙或 USB 连接的外置音频设备。这两种方式都能完美地工作，最重要的音频编解码器都可以通过无线方式连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Find X9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 17 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Oppo 配备了大容量电池

耗电量

在我们进行的各种场景下的功耗测试中，Oppo Find X9 被证明并不像许多竞争对手那样节能。

这款手机的有线充电功率可达 80 瓦，无线充电功率可达 50 瓦。从空机到充满有线充电只需不到一个小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.2 / 1.8 / 2.5 Watt
Load	7.9 / 12.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Find X9 7025 mAh	OnePlus 15 7300 mAh	Oppo Find X9 Pro 7500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		13%	31%	8%	16%	16%	21%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.2	1.2 -0%	0.6 50%	0.45 62%	1.1 8%	0.9 ?(0.6 - 1.2, n=2) 25%	0.849 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=160, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.8	1.4 22%	1 44%	1.09 39%	1.3 28%	1.4 ?(1 - 1.8, n=2) 22%	1.43 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.5	1.8 28%	1.3 48%	1.13 55%	1.5 40%	1.9 ?(1.3 - 2.5, n=2) 24%	1.615 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 35%
Load Average * (Watt)	7.9	6.7 15%	6.9 13%	14.41 -82%	7.6 4%	7.4 ?(6.9 - 7.9, n=2) 6%	7.08 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=140, last 2 years) 10%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	12.2	12.3 -1%	11.9 2%	16.37 -34%	12 2%	12.1 ?(11.9 - 12.2, n=2) 1%	11.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=140, last 2 years) 8%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X9; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.55 (3.75-12.2)

Oppo Find X9; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.471 (1.228-2.49)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X9; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.1 (12-12.2)

Oppo Find X9; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.471 (1.228-2.49)

电池寿命

电池容量超过 7,000 毫安时，体积非常大，在我们的 Wi-Fi 实际测试中，运行时间刚刚超过 29 小时，非常适合日常使用。

这应该能让用户在不充电的情况下使用两天甚至三天。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		29h 04min

	Oppo Find X9 7025 mAh	OnePlus 15 7300 mAh	Oppo Find X9 Pro 7500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh
Battery runtime		5%	18%	-32%	-31%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	29.1	30.7 5%	34.3 18%	19.8 -32%	20.1 -31%
Reader / Idle (h)		66.4	65.6	56.6	66.7
H.264 (h)		36.5	41.2	30.1	29.4
Load (h)		4.2	5	4	4.4

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Oppo Find X9 价格相对较低，性能不错。

不过，你必须接受明显的节流和一些相机方面的小妥协。

Back to the verdict

Oppo Find X9 - 11/28/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

61 / 69 → 89%

Weight

88%

Battery

95%

Display

92%

Games Performance

36 / 55 → 65%

Application Performance

73 / 85 → 86%

AI Performance

12%

Temperature

83%

Noise

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

84%

Average

70%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
10%

Packaging
90%

Power Use
95.5%

Repairability
66%

Software Updates
96.7%

Total Sustainability Score: 59.7%

可能的替代品比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 86.1%	Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $10.49 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for O... 2. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 3. $9.91 MAOUICI Tempered Glass for O... List Price: 999€	203 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.59" 2760x1256 460 PPI AMOLED
2. 87.1%	OnePlus 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $799.99 OnePlus 13,16GB RAM + 512GB ... 2. $9.99 ottpluscase [2 Pack Screen P... 3. $8.99 Suttkue for OnePlus 15 Scree... List Price: 999€	215 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED
3. 87.7%	Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ... 2. $9.99 Shantime [2 Pack Tempered Gl... 3. $6.67 FZZSZS (3-Pack Screen Protec... List Price: 1299€	224 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI LTPO AMOLED
4. 88.4%	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $1,120.00 Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ... 2. $904.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-... 3. $949.50 Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G ... List Price: 1149 Euro	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5. 87.9%	Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19 ⎘ Apple A19 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	Amazon: 1. $1,299.00 iPhone 17 Pro (Silver, 256, GB) 2. $25.00 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili... 3. $25.00 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone... List Price: 949 Euro	177 g	256 GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 460 PPI OLED

Oppo Find X9 智能手机评测--低于 900 美元的高端手机，但存在 SoC 问题

小兄弟还是大对手？

结论 - Oppo Find X9

Pros

Cons

价格和可用性

Table of Contents

规格

机箱 - 稳定的机箱，纤薄的边框

尺寸比较

功能 - 最高 16GB 内存

软件 - 尖端安全

可持续性

通信 - WiFi 7 和全球移动通信

电话功能和语音质量 - 清晰响亮

照相机 - 不算顶级

输入设备和操作 - 带可分配按键

显示屏 - 快速明亮的 AMOLED

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 快速，但有问题

排放物 - 可能会发热

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Oppo Find X9 audio analysis

Apple iPhone 17 audio analysis

电池续航时间 - Oppo 配备了大容量电池

耗电量

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency