Notebookcheck Logo
小米 17 Pro Max 笔记本电脑评测

小米 17 Pro Max 智能手机评测--这款巨型手机的第二块显示屏能否帮助它走出Apple 的阴影?

不仅仅是Apple 克隆版?

体型巨大的小米 17 Pro Max 雄心勃勃,要与世界上最好的智能手机一较高下。为了实现这一目标,它拥有两块亮度极高的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏和四个 5000 万像素摄像头,每个摄像头都有自己的传感器。这款大型手机能否在Apple 和三星的竞争中脱颖而出?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone

结论 - 小米 17 Pro Max

小米 17 Pro Max 是一款出色的、快如闪电的智能手机,它拥有明亮的屏幕、快速的存储、迅捷的网络以及你所希望的所有功能。

它的大容量电池带来了真正出色的续航时间,目前很少有Android 智能手机能与之媲美。Apple另一方面,由于进行了大量的软件优化,"魅族 X "几乎能与小巧得多的电池保持同步。

明亮的屏幕还能有效显示 HDR 内容,高档的外壳做工也无可挑剔。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

真正的亮点是背面相对较大的显示屏,但这也引发了一些问题:未来的应用支持会是什么样子?掉落时会不会很脆弱?

小米对操作系统的更新支持和可持续性也守口如瓶。

此外,这款手机很可能不会在亚洲以外的地区正式发布。虽然通过像深圳贸易公司这样的专业零售商进口该手机是一个相对简单的过程,但仍然存在一些限制,如不支持Android Auto 和 eSIM。

尽管如此,专用相机传感器和副显示屏使小米 17 Pro Max 成为一款非常引人注目的高端手机。

Pros

+ 超长电池寿命
+ 两个非常明亮的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏
+ 高品质摄像系统
+ 强大的性能
+ 高速 UFS 4.1 存储
+ 快速 Wi-Fi 包括 Wi-Fi 7
+ 功能全面

Cons

- 在负载情况下产生大量热量
- 严重节流
- 副显示屏对应用程序的支持有限
- 尚未在亚洲以外地区正式发行
- 主要应用程序中存在广告
- 没有Android Auto
- 不支持 eSIM
- 在西方国家预装的应用程序毫无意义
- 西方语言只有英语
- 更新时间不明确
- PWM 闪烁

价格和供应情况

贸易深圳

我们的设备贷方TradingShenzhen目前提供小米 17 Pro Max,起价 1088 元。

通常情况下,这家零售商不会从香港收取任何额外的进口费用。

17 Pro Max--任何人听到这个名字可能都会立即想到Apple 最大的 iPhone 机型。而小米似乎有意抄袭了世界上最成功的智能手机之一的名字。

17 Pro Max 是目前 17 系列中最大的机型,至少在以下日期之前是如此 12 月小米 17 Ultra 上市之前。

我们的评测将深入探讨后置副显示屏是否真正有用,以及小米(及其大胆的名称选择)是否真的能与Apple 的旗舰手机竞争。

规格

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8 x 3.6 - 4.6 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.90 inch 20:9, 2608 x 1200 pixel 416 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass 3; second display (back): 2.9'', 976 x 596 pixels, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
1TB UFS 4.1 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 992 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer, UWB
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8; 3G:B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19; 4G:FDD-LTE:B1 / B2 / B3 / B4 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B12 / B17 / B18 / B19 / B20 / B25 / B26 / B28 / B66 TDD-LTE:B34 / B38 / B39 / B40 / B41 / B42 / B48; 5G:n1 / n2 / n3 / n5 / n7 / n8 / n12 / n18 / n20 / n25 / n26 / n28 / n38 / n40 / n41 / n48 / n66 / n77 / n78 / n80 / n81 / n83 / n84 / n89 , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 162.9 x 77.6
Battery
7500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 100 Watt charging, 50 Watt wireless charging, 22.5 Watt reverse wireless charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.7, 23mm, 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS (camera 1); 50 MP, f/2.6, 115mm, 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom (camera 2); 50 MP, f/2.4, 17mm, 102°, 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF video@4K@30/60fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, bumper, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, IP 68 certified, fanless, waterproof
Weight
219 g
Price
940 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

表壳 - 高级且边框纤薄

使用 小米 17 Pro变得更加小巧之后,小米显然仍希望为大屏幕粉丝提供一款顶级智能手机。

为此,小米 17 Pro Max 配备了一块 6.9 英寸的屏幕,机身尺寸几乎与三星 S25 Ultra 相同。 三星Galaxy S25 UltraApple iPhone 17 Pro Max.

手机正面的屏占比接近 91%,边框几乎看不到。小米选择使用自己专有的小米龙晶玻璃 3 进行保护,据说只有在莫氏硬度为 7 的材料上才会出现划痕。

这款手机的防水防尘等级为 IP68,这意味着它不仅可以在肮脏的环境中使用,还可以在水下使用。

铝制边框为手机提供了良好的稳定性,这意味着你无法徒手扭转手机。

不过,后置屏幕的稳定性要打个问号,因为它凸出外壳很远,而且没有像正面一样采用高质量的保护玻璃。

简洁的磨砂背面看起来很优雅,有深灰色、白色、紫色或绿色可供选择。

尺寸比较

163.4 mm 78 mm 8.8 mm 233 g163.1 mm 76.8 mm 8.8 mm 226 g163.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.7 mm 229 g162.8 mm 77.6 mm 8.2 mm 218 g162.9 mm 77.6 mm 8 mm 219 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 - 价格相对实惠,存储空间大

小米 17 Pro Max 有三种存储版本:

  • 12 GB 内存 / 512 GB UFS 4.1 数据存储空间
  • 16 GB 内存 / 512 GB UFS 4.1 数据存储空间
  • 16 GB 内存 / 1,024 GB UFS 4.1 数据存储空间

小米提供的选择不如Apple 或三星多。不过,在价格方面,它明显低于竞争对手,徘徊在 1000 美元左右。

USB-C 端口的数据传输速率高达 5 Gbps,还具有 DisplayPort 模式,可以在手机和外部显示器之间建立有线连接。

内置的超宽带支持可确保快速数据交换,还包括精确的位置跟踪功能,以及用于移动支付服务和 ID 应用的 NFC 功能。

由于 eSIM 在中国尚未广泛使用,因此两个 nano-SIM 插槽是使用 SIM 卡的唯一途径。

顶部:无端口
顶部:无端口
底部扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
底部扬声器、USB 端口、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽
左:无端口
左:无端口
右侧音量摇杆、待机键
右侧音量摇杆、待机键

软件 - 也与 Google Play 合作

小米的 HyperOS 3 基于Android 16,是一款非常先进的操作系统。谷歌 Play 服务已经加入,可以在设置中完全启用。

不过,中文 ROM 预装了许多应用程序,你可能会觉得有必要卸载,因为它们在西方地区几乎无法使用。此外,唯一的西方语言选项是英语。此外,还存在其他一些限制,如Android Auto。

更新的持续时间也不确定。在本次评测期间,我们设备上的安全更新是 2025 年 10 月的最新版本。

小米 17 Pro Max 软件
小米 17 Pro Max 软件
小米 17 Pro Max 软件

可持续性

遗憾的是,目前还没有关于该智能手机碳足迹或所用材料回收率的信息。此外,目前还不清楚小米是否会提供备件和维修手册。

积极的一面是,这款手机采用无塑料包装。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 包括 WiFi 7

目前,WiFi 7 是最先进的 WiFi 标准,小米 17 Pro Max 也采用了这一标准;不过,我们的华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器还不是为它设计的。使用 WiFi 6E 标准,这款手机的数据传输速度仍然高达 1748 Mbps。这将让您充分利用千兆互联网连接的优势,并为更快的网络留出空间。

在靠近路由器的地方,接收效果非常好,网站加载非常迅速。在十米远的地方,隔着三面墙,信号强度仍然只有一半,虽然可以看出传输速度稍慢,但浏览仍然完全可以应付。

在移动连接方面,这款高端手机支持所有必要的频率,可以在全球范围内使用 LTE 和 5G 网络,因此小米 17 Pro Max 非常适合旅行使用。

在我们的抽查测试中,信号始终很强,即使在高楼之间的挑战性地点也能保持足够的信号。

Networking
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
956 (min: 795) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1609 (min: 1520) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
933 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1407) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
910 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
459 (min: 411) MBit/s ∼27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1375 (min: 1300) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1180 (min: 1117) MBit/s ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
595 (min: 484) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1721 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo X200 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
644 (min: 520) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1561 (min: 1441) MBit/s ∼91%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
721 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
748 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼87%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø933 (846-1053)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1620 (1407-1748)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø956 (795-1130)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1609 (1520-1739)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

带着小米 17 Pro Max 走到户外,我们很快就被定位了,精确度为 3 米。虽然不支持精度更高的 SBAS(天基指定搜索),但每个主要的卫星网络都可用。

我们很想测试一下它在实际情况下的精确度。为此,我们骑了一次自行车,并用 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表进行了比较。

小米手机很好地追踪了我们的路线,只是偶尔会让我们在路上稍稍偏离中心,尽管没有出现任何重大错误。总的来说,这也是一款非常实用的导航设备。

小米 17 Pro Max 导航 - 概览
小米 17 Pro Max 导航 - 概览
小米 17 Pro Max 导航 - 转折点
小米 17 Pro Max 导航 - 转折点
小米 17 Pro Max 导航 - 桥接
小米 17 Pro Max 导航 - 桥接
Ortung Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
Ortung Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
Ortung Garmin Venu 2 - 转折点
Ortung Garmin Venu 2 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 导航仪 - 桥
Garmin Venu 2 导航仪 - 桥

电话功能和语音质量 - 音质良好

小米开发了自己的易用手机应用。运营商服务 "选项卡在欧洲用处不大,因为这里的网络供应商不允许使用该功能查看余额。它还宣传只在中国提供的电话计划(!)。

支持 VoLTE 和 VoWiFi 等功能,你甚至可以通过蓝牙呼叫附近的其他小米手机。

通话质量很好,我们的联系人在测试通话中确认我们的声音听起来很清晰。反过来,他们的声音也非常清晰。使用免提电话和免提麦克风通话时,效果也很好。

照相机 - 定制传感器能否达到顶峰?

前置摄像头图像
前置摄像头图像

这些摄像头使用了三个不同制造商生产的传感器:前置摄像头和超广角摄像头使用的是 Omnivision 传感器,长焦镜头及其 5 倍潜望式变焦使用的是三星传感器。主摄像头采用了一个相当神秘的传感器,我们的系统硬件应用程序将其识别为 STX9500U,尽管小米自己称其为 Light Hunter 950L。据中国消息来源称,这可能是 SmartSens SC590XS 或另一款 Omnivision 传感器。

每款相机都有 5000 万像素的分辨率,但它们通常拍摄 1250 万像素的图像。当然,可以通过特殊模式激活全分辨率。该相机系统是与徕卡公司合作开发的。

主摄像头拍摄的照片细节丰富,动态范围大,能够捕捉具有挑战性的场景,如明亮光线下的黄色花朵。在弱光环境下,清晰度依然很高,许多细节清晰可辨,不过暗部的动态范围可能会更好一些。

广角摄像头拍摄效果不错,但边缘略有变形,在高倍放大时,细节较少。前置摄像头自拍清晰细腻。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

PlantEnvironmentLow lightWide-angle
orginal image
click to load images

录制的视频最高分辨率可达 8K,每秒 30 帧,4K 每秒可达 120 帧。录制质量非常出色,自动对焦反应灵敏,几乎察觉不到,曝光校正也非常迅速。

色彩还原可以说是略微过度饱和,但总体上与理想状态的偏差很小。

ColorChecker
11.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: 9.02 ∆E min: 1.39 - max: 16.08 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.3 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: 9.47 ∆E min: 1.92 - max: 16.15 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括充电器

包装盒内有充电器、USB 数据线、SIM 卡工具和一个透明硅胶保护套。即使在德国,您也可以在网上找到一些配件,如智能手机保护套。我们的设备贷方 Tradingshenzhen 还提供了一个适用于西方电源插座的适配器。

小米提供 12 个月的 保修.不过,我们建议使用进口商,因为直接运送到中国既有风险又非常昂贵。

输入设备和操作 - 快速触摸屏

由于采用了 300 Hz 采样率,触摸屏输入识别非常准确。120 Hz 的屏幕反应也很迅速,我们还非常喜欢振动电机带来的触觉反馈。

后置 AMOLED 显示屏也很可靠,不过你能用它做的事情并不多:除了相机取景器、时钟和计步器之外,它目前只能显示通知,而且不能直接从屏幕上启动应用程序。

小米的 3D 超声波指纹传感器技术隐藏在正面屏幕后面。它工作可靠,解锁速度非常快。面部识别也可以通过前置摄像头进行。这种方法非常可靠,但安全性较差,而且更容易被操控。

显示屏 - 小米手机采用特殊的子像素布局

子像素排列
子像素排列

6.9 英寸 AMOLED 大屏幕采用 LTPO 技术,可在每秒 1 到 120 帧之间动态调整刷新率。这样在观看静态内容时可以节省能耗,同时确保动态内容的流畅运动跟踪。

从纸面上看,该屏幕的分辨率略低于其他一些手机,但它提供了一个独特的功能:我们的显微镜图像显示了一种不同寻常的子像素排列。这种排列设计使每个像素实际上都能接收到三原色中每一种颜色的全 LED,小米称这使显示屏更加高效。在我们的测试中,图像质量与其他手机一样高。

这款手机的最大亮度接近 1,100 cd/m²,虽然亮度不及某些高端机型,但对于全屏白光来说仍然完全够用。在较小的区域也能达到远高于 3,000 cd/m² 的亮度水平,保证了出色的 HDR 性能。

1086
cd/m²
1076
cd/m²
1069
cd/m²
1053
cd/m²
1099
cd/m²
1052
cd/m²
1049
cd/m²
1055
cd/m²
1067
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1099 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1067.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1099 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.05 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
103% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.232
CCT: 6779 K
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Vivo X200 Ultra
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Screen
-13%
-45%
19%
7%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1099
1054
-4%
1357
23%
1366
24%
1286
17%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1067
1059
-1%
1350
27%
1325
24%
1238
16%
Brightness Distribution (%)
95
93
-2%
94
-1%
95
0%
93
-2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.05
1.57
-50%
3.1
-195%
0.88
16%
1.04
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.38
2.8
-18%
4.7
-97%
1.55
35%
2.26
5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.7
-0%
2.2
-29%
1.5
12%
1.6
6%
Gamma
2.232 99%
2.32 95%
2 110%
2.303 96%
2.249 98%
CCT
6779 96%
6993 93%
6391 102%
6626 98%
6575 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 122.4 Hz
Amplitude: 19 %

The display backlight flickers at 122.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 122.4 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。

你必须忍受 PWM 闪烁,但它适应了 120 Hz 的刷新率,因此可能不那么令人烦恼。不过,对此类问题敏感的用户在购买前应先试用屏幕。

灰度和色彩显示细腻、准确。在 "原色专业 "模式下,肉眼看不出与参考色彩有任何差异。

卡尔曼灰阶
卡尔曼灰阶
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN Adobe RGB
CalMAN Adobe RGB
卡尔曼 DCI P3
卡尔曼 DCI P3
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 33.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 91.4 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

在室外,明亮的屏幕即使在晴天也非常清晰,而且各面的视角稳定性也非常好。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 超大功率节流

配备 高通骁龙 8 精英 5 代系统芯片,小米 17 Pro Max 拥有目前最快的Android 智能手机处理器之一。就纯粹的处理能力而言,它确实非常出色,只有当前一代的 iPhone 比它更快。

不过,在系统基准测试中,我们的评测设备偶尔会出现问题,稍稍落后于 小米 17 Pro.我们很快就会在排放测试中看到其中的原因。

在人工智能计算中,这款手机的表现有些不稳定,但总的来说,它跟上了对比设备的步伐。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
3883 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3587 - 3831, n=5)
3692 Points +1%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3640 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points -12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3145 Points -14%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2976 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=210, last 2 years)
1727 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 - 12383, n=5)
11255 Points +6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
10620 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
10017 Points -6%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9722 Points -8%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9284 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=210, last 2 years)
5043 Points -53%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2845517 Points +19%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2760009 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2390211 - 3269237, n=4)
2692258 Points +13%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
2629691 Points +10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2390211 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2262067 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=153, last 2 years)
1446031 Points -40%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (19432 - 28557, n=4)
22175 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +5%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19833 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18897 Points -5%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
15938 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=189, last 2 years)
14720 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1858 - 2495, n=4)
2289 Points +23%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2162 Points +16%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1858 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1689 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=131, last 2 years)
1126 Points -39%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (12929 - 14076, n=3)
13663 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
12929 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11073 Points -14%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8155 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14076, n=148, last 2 years)
7472 Points -42%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (18137 - 19244, n=3)
18863 Points +4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18137 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points -5%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
15326 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=148, last 2 years)
11207 Points -38%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10953 Points -40%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (13505 - 16984, n=3)
15818 Points +17%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
13505 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11234 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=148, last 2 years)
8486 Points -37%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7081 Points -48%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Graphics
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
384996 Points +623%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
53231 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (52356 - 53231, n=3)
52655 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points -14%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
42332 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)
24928 Points -53%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2143 - 2257, n=3)
2211 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2143 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2095 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=148, last 2 years)
1675 Points -22%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1477 Points -31%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23281 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (22372 - 23712, n=4)
23071 Points +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
22372 Points
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
21543 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=138, last 2 years)
19738 Points -12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12176 Points -46%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
37611 Points +2485%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)
27075 Points +1761%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2043 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1923 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1455 - 2381, n=3)
1875 Points +29%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1455 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
995 Points -32%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
5155 Points +884%
Average of class Smartphone
  (81 - 5210, n=45, last 2 years)
906 Points +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (524 - 698, n=4)
603 Points +15%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
524 Points
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
36297 Points +7369%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=45, last 2 years)
4242 Points +773%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 676, n=4)
596 Points +23%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
486 Points
Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288
48828 Points +4913%
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=45, last 2 years)
6051 Points +521%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1498, n=4)
1240 Points +27%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
974 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=43, last 2 years)
884 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
240 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
14336 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12567 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1098 - 22149, n=3)
12528 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22149, n=70, last 2 years)
4507 Points -69%

使用 Adreno 840、你还能获得目前最快的图形解决方案之一,它支持网格着色和光线追踪等现代功能。

不过,在 GPU 基准测试中,小米 17 Pro Max 无法与其他高端智能手机媲美。尽管如此,在现实生活中,这种差异还是不太明显,因为很少有应用程序或游戏能将图形芯片的性能发挥到极致。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points +12%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6743 Points +9%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6691 Points +8%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
6168 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
5959 Points -3%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points +9%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6722 Points +7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6684 Points +6%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
6289 Points
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6033 Points -4%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
26375 Points +14%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25847 Points +12%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
25127 Points +9%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
23088 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points +13%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
12239 Points +12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11973 Points +9%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
11776 Points +7%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10958 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points +17%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
12447 Points +14%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
12227 Points +12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11983 Points +10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
10886 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2588 Points
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2571 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2538 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2679 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2589 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2584 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
788 fps +47%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
776 fps +45%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
748 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps +33%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
537 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
487 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +44%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
411 fps +26%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
410 fps +25%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
327 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +9%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +9%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
110 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
344 fps +48%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
324 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps +22%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
282 fps +22%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
232 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +22%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
85 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -29%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
216 fps +71%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
212 fps +68%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
207 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps +28%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
126 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
100 fps
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps -8%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -40%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -40%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +82%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
118 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps +65%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
86 fps +32%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
65 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +12%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +12%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
107 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps -44%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
332 fps +64%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
321 fps +58%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
247 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps +17%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
203 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
53 fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +49%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +49%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
36.4 fps +4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
35 fps

使用小米 17 Pro Max 上网是一种非常快速、轻松的体验,即使是大型网页也几乎可以瞬间加载,一切运行都很流畅。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
358.295 Points +228%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
315.056 Points +188%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=155, last 2 years)
153.1 Points +40%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
109.286 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 137.4, n=3)
105.6 Points -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
643 runs/min +3%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
624 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (593 - 624, n=2)
609 runs/min -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
425 runs/min -32%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=132, last 2 years)
218 runs/min -65%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
42.8 runs/min +105%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
29.3 runs/min +40%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)
22.6 runs/min +8%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
20.9 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (16.5 - 20.9, n=3)
19.4 runs/min -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=122, last 2 years)
14.3 runs/min -32%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
306 Points +10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
278 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=4)
154 Points -45%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)
150 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=148, last 2 years)
144.8 Points -48%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)
135 Points -51%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
121337 Points +22%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
99417 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)
91563 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 - 99417, n=4)
76542 Points -23%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)
59387 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=201, last 2 years)
48255 Points -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years)
1188 ms * -288%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)
612.34 ms * -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (306 - 635, n=4)
475 ms * -55%
Vivo X200 Ultra
417.65 ms * -37%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * -23%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141)
305.9 ms *
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0)
256.9 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.1 存储系统使存储访问速度极快,即使在传输大量小文件时也能显著提高速度。

Xiaomi 17 Pro MaxSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraOppo Find X8 UltraVivo X200 UltraAverage 1TB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-27%
-19%
-18%
-11%
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
3971.4
3823.28
-4%
3754.43
-5%
3358.64
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3899.9
3361.24
-14%
3564.22
-9%
2998.87
-23%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
548.4
287.85
-48%
375.9
-31%
462.41
-16%
304 ?(58.8 - 548, n=2)
-45%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
561.3
331.61
-41%
389.28
-31%
459.33
-18%

游戏 - 主要以 60fps 的速度玩游戏

小米 17 Pro Max 拥有强大的 CPU 和 GPU,是一款出色的游戏手机。它的长效电池还能确保长时间游戏而无需充电。

在我们测试的几乎所有游戏和模式中,我们都获得了持续稳定的 60fps 帧率。只有在以超高清模式玩《PUBG Mobile》时,我们才发现帧率下降到了 40fps。

我们使用GameBench软件来测量这些帧率。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø60 (54-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø59.6 (47-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.6 (45-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (55-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (39-41)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø59.8 (56-61)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø58.8 (27-61)

排放 - 带立体声扬声器的急性子

温度

在负载情况下,手机会明显发热,一段时间后,设备的边框会变得非常热。随后,在我们的压力测试中,手机两次过载,必须冷却后才能继续进行基准测试。

记录到的超过 50°C 的机箱温度非常明显,在较热的环境中可能会更高。

3DMark 压力测试还显示,在持续负载情况下,手机会出现明显的节流现象,在 Wild Life 测试中,手机性能下降了近 40%。

这种极端的节流现象可以解释为什么小米 17 Pro Max 在很多场景下都无法赶上其他手机。

Max. Load
 48.2 °C46.5 °C45.5 °C 
 49.3 °C46.2 °C44.3 °C 
 50.4 °C49.2 °C46.5 °C 
Maximum: 50.4 °C
Average: 47.3 °C
46.3 °C47.2 °C48.2 °C
44.4 °C46.8 °C49.8 °C
45.5 °C47.3 °C49.9 °C
Maximum: 49.9 °C
Average: 47.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.6 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.3 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
99.8 % +66%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
81.4 % +35%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
60.3 %
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.9 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % -9%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
88.9 % +36%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
71.8 % +10%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
65.2 %
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.8 % -11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 % -20%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 % +35%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.8 % +7%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % +4%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash
69.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -29%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
93.6 %
Vivo X200 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.7 %
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
64.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø27.7 (24.7-37.8)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø93.1 (81.6-135.4)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø28.3 (25.3-36.3)
正面热图
正面热图
后方热图
后方热图

发言人

底部边缘的扬声器由听筒支撑,当水平握持手机时,它们共同实现了立体声效果。这两个扬声器结合在一起,产生了令人信服的音场效果,但在播放大音量音乐时有时会显得有些紧张。

电影原声一般都不错,并能显示一些低频,但我们建议将音量调低一些,以保持声音更纯净并防止失真。

外置音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 6.0 连接。它支持所有重要的蓝牙音频编解码器,这意味着您可以轻松连接无线设备,并获得良好的音质。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.539.92543.236.13134.730.84036.535.95044.345.36329.429.98018.830.210021.743.71252152.51602058.620017.660.62501663.531516.967.940013.164.750017.265.663021.166.480021.366.8100018.167.9125016.274.8160017.876.3200016.374.5250012.869.8315012.568.2400011.971.2500012.572.1630012.680.2800012.476.81000012.368.31250012.270.51600011.666.7SPL28.385.8N166.1median 16.2median 67.9Delta3.53.340.85135.541.130.329.837.228.332.63518.22418.325.121.135.918.642.51648.616.254.918.356.217.860.614.258.914.967.118.87320.369.316.87514.874.61778.21479.912.679.31276.811.872.41273.212.1671267.31270.211.863.811.449.327.187.40.967.5median 14.8median 67.538.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 17 Pro MaxVivo X200 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Vivo X200 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 - 超大电池意味着超长运行时间

耗电量

小米 17 Pro Max 相当节能,与小米 17 类似,它的耗电量相对较低,尤其是在负载情况下。在这种使用情况下,你可能会发现手机的性能有些受限。

最大充电功率为 100 瓦。我们的评测设备随附了一个充电器,大容量电池在不到一个小时的时间内就充满了电,至少在启动升压模式时是这样。

无线充电也是可行的,最大功率为 50 瓦。使用数据线可直接从手机为其他设备充电,功率为 22.5 瓦,甚至还可以通过手机本身为耳机无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.8 / 1.4 Watt
Load midlight 6.5 / 9.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7500 mAh
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
4823 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
6100 mAh
Vivo X200 Ultra
6000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-30%
-29%
-154%
-24%
-34%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.6
0.6
-0%
0.55
8%
0.8
-33%
1.6
-167%
0.733 ?(0.6 - 0.83, n=4)
-22%
Idle Average * (Watt)
0.8
1.3
-63%
0.77
4%
1.1
-38%
2.9
-263%
1.433 ?(0.8 - 2.13, n=4)
-79%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.4
1.6
-14%
0.91
35%
1.6
-14%
3.7
-164%
1.77 ?(1.4 - 2.18, n=4)
-26%
Load Average * (Watt)
6.5
4.1
37%
13.81
-112%
8.5
-31%
10.6
-63%
5.53 ?(4.2 - 6.5, n=3)
15%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
9.1
11.5
-26%
16.69
-83%
11.8
-30%
19.5
-114%

* ... smaller is better

功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.23 (0.824-9.13)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.737 (0.638-1.005)

功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9 (8.87-9.1)
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.737 (0.638-1.005)

电池寿命

这款手机配备 7500 毫安时超大容量电池。小米采用 L 形电池,由于硅含量较高,因此能量密度特别高。

额外的屏幕优化设计可帮助手机节省更多能源。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,17 Pro Max 的续航时间达到了 33 小时 46 分钟。这甚至比 iPhone 17 Pro Max的续航时间还要长。

不过,这也显示出小米无法与Apple 手机的效率相媲美:由于电池容量不足 5,000 mAh,小米手机的续航时间比 iPhone 短了 15%。

几天没有电源插座对小米 17 Pro Max 来说不成问题,即使在满负荷状态下,也能玩上 5 个多小时的游戏。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
70h 13min
WiFi Websurfing
33h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
34h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 06min
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
7500 mAh
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
4823 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
6100 mAh
Vivo X200 Ultra
6000 mAh
Battery runtime
-15%
-26%
-18%
-31%
Reader / Idle (h)
70.2
45.8
-35%
H.264 (h)
34.8
32.3
-7%
33.5
-4%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
33.8
28.6
-15%
22.2
-34%
22.9
-32%
23.3
-31%
Load (h)
5.1
3.7
-27%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 17 Pro Max 是一款高品质手机,电池续航时间很长,进口价格相对便宜。

不过,这也带来了一些缺点,手机的主要功能--副屏幕目前只能在有限的应用程序中使用。

小米 17 Pro Max 评测。评测设备由 Trading Shenzhen 提供。
小米 17 Pro Max 评测。评测设备由 Trading Shenzhen 提供。

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max - 11/02/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
66 / 69 → 96%
Weight
88%
Battery
97%
Display
92%
Games Performance
40 / 55 → 72%
Application Performance
82 / 85 → 97%
AI Performance
32%
Temperature
80%
Noise
100%
Audio
85 / 90 → 94%
Camera
87%
Average
69%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
93.4%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
75%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.7%

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89%
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $9.90
Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi...
2. $8.98
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
3. $9.98
120W USB Type C Fast Chargin...
List Price: 940€
219 g1TB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED
2.
89.2%
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Apple A19 Pro ⎘
Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. $49.99
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Tech...
2. $37.99
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili...
3. $1,419.00
iPhone 17 Pro Max Deep Blue ...
List Price: 1449 Euro
233 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
460 PPI
OLED
3.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $1,054.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-...
2. $1,157.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy ​S25 Ultra ...
3. $7.57
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
List Price: 1449€
218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
90.7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $11.02
[1-Pack] for Oppo Find X8 Ul...
3. $10.89
UYRUREL Screen Protector for...
List Price: 1050€
226 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
5.
88.3%
Vivo X200 Ultra
Vivo X200 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $17.24
YQINHHME for Vivo X200 Ultra...
2. $13.92
HGJTFANY [3 Pcs Screen Prote...
3. 
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
List Price: 890€
229 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 17 Pro Max 智能手机评测--这款巨型手机的第二块显示屏能否帮助它走出Apple 的阴影?
Florian Schmitt, 2025-11- 2 (Update: 2025-11- 2)