结论 - 小米 17 Pro Max
小米 17 Pro Max 是一款出色的、快如闪电的智能手机,它拥有明亮的屏幕、快速的存储、迅捷的网络以及你所希望的所有功能。
它的大容量电池带来了真正出色的续航时间,目前很少有Android 智能手机能与之媲美。Apple另一方面,由于进行了大量的软件优化,"魅族 X "几乎能与小巧得多的电池保持同步。
明亮的屏幕还能有效显示 HDR 内容,高档的外壳做工也无可挑剔。
真正的亮点是背面相对较大的显示屏,但这也引发了一些问题:未来的应用支持会是什么样子?掉落时会不会很脆弱?
小米对操作系统的更新支持和可持续性也守口如瓶。
此外,这款手机很可能不会在亚洲以外的地区正式发布。虽然通过像深圳贸易公司这样的专业零售商进口该手机是一个相对简单的过程,但仍然存在一些限制,如不支持Android Auto 和 eSIM。
尽管如此,专用相机传感器和副显示屏使小米 17 Pro Max 成为一款非常引人注目的高端手机。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
我们的设备贷方TradingShenzhen目前提供小米 17 Pro Max,起价 1088 元。
通常情况下,这家零售商不会从香港收取任何额外的进口费用。
。
17 Pro Max--任何人听到这个名字可能都会立即想到Apple 最大的 iPhone 机型。而小米似乎有意抄袭了世界上最成功的智能手机之一的名字。
17 Pro Max 是目前 17 系列中最大的机型,至少在以下日期之前是如此 12 月小米 17 Ultra 上市之前。
我们的评测将深入探讨后置副显示屏是否真正有用,以及小米(及其大胆的名称选择)是否真的能与Apple 的旗舰手机竞争。
规格
表壳 - 高级且边框纤薄
使用 小米 17 Pro变得更加小巧之后,小米显然仍希望为大屏幕粉丝提供一款顶级智能手机。
为此,小米 17 Pro Max 配备了一块 6.9 英寸的屏幕,机身尺寸几乎与三星 S25 Ultra 相同。 三星Galaxy S25 Ultra和 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max.
手机正面的屏占比接近 91%,边框几乎看不到。小米选择使用自己专有的小米龙晶玻璃 3 进行保护,据说只有在莫氏硬度为 7 的材料上才会出现划痕。
这款手机的防水防尘等级为 IP68,这意味着它不仅可以在肮脏的环境中使用,还可以在水下使用。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
铝制边框为手机提供了良好的稳定性,这意味着你无法徒手扭转手机。
不过,后置屏幕的稳定性要打个问号,因为它凸出外壳很远,而且没有像正面一样采用高质量的保护玻璃。
简洁的磨砂背面看起来很优雅,有深灰色、白色、紫色或绿色可供选择。
特点 - 价格相对实惠,存储空间大
小米 17 Pro Max 有三种存储版本:
- 12 GB 内存 / 512 GB UFS 4.1 数据存储空间
- 16 GB 内存 / 512 GB UFS 4.1 数据存储空间
- 16 GB 内存 / 1,024 GB UFS 4.1 数据存储空间
小米提供的选择不如Apple 或三星多。不过,在价格方面,它明显低于竞争对手,徘徊在 1000 美元左右。
USB-C 端口的数据传输速率高达 5 Gbps,还具有 DisplayPort 模式,可以在手机和外部显示器之间建立有线连接。
内置的超宽带支持可确保快速数据交换,还包括精确的位置跟踪功能,以及用于移动支付服务和 ID 应用的 NFC 功能。
由于 eSIM 在中国尚未广泛使用,因此两个 nano-SIM 插槽是使用 SIM 卡的唯一途径。
软件 - 也与 Google Play 合作
可持续性
遗憾的是,目前还没有关于该智能手机碳足迹或所用材料回收率的信息。此外,目前还不清楚小米是否会提供备件和维修手册。
积极的一面是,这款手机采用无塑料包装。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 包括 WiFi 7
目前,WiFi 7 是最先进的 WiFi 标准,小米 17 Pro Max 也采用了这一标准;不过,我们的华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器还不是为它设计的。使用 WiFi 6E 标准,这款手机的数据传输速度仍然高达 1748 Mbps。这将让您充分利用千兆互联网连接的优势,并为更快的网络留出空间。
在靠近路由器的地方,接收效果非常好,网站加载非常迅速。在十米远的地方,隔着三面墙,信号强度仍然只有一半,虽然可以看出传输速度稍慢,但浏览仍然完全可以应付。
在移动连接方面,这款高端手机支持所有必要的频率,可以在全球范围内使用 LTE 和 5G 网络,因此小米 17 Pro Max 非常适合旅行使用。
在我们的抽查测试中,信号始终很强,即使在高楼之间的挑战性地点也能保持足够的信号。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
电话功能和语音质量 - 音质良好
小米开发了自己的易用手机应用。运营商服务 "选项卡在欧洲用处不大,因为这里的网络供应商不允许使用该功能查看余额。它还宣传只在中国提供的电话计划(!)。
支持 VoLTE 和 VoWiFi 等功能,你甚至可以通过蓝牙呼叫附近的其他小米手机。
通话质量很好,我们的联系人在测试通话中确认我们的声音听起来很清晰。反过来,他们的声音也非常清晰。使用免提电话和免提麦克风通话时,效果也很好。
照相机 - 定制传感器能否达到顶峰?
这些摄像头使用了三个不同制造商生产的传感器:前置摄像头和超广角摄像头使用的是 Omnivision 传感器,长焦镜头及其 5 倍潜望式变焦使用的是三星传感器。主摄像头采用了一个相当神秘的传感器,我们的系统硬件应用程序将其识别为 STX9500U,尽管小米自己称其为 Light Hunter 950L。据中国消息来源称,这可能是 SmartSens SC590XS 或另一款 Omnivision 传感器。
每款相机都有 5000 万像素的分辨率,但它们通常拍摄 1250 万像素的图像。当然,可以通过特殊模式激活全分辨率。该相机系统是与徕卡公司合作开发的。
主摄像头拍摄的照片细节丰富,动态范围大,能够捕捉具有挑战性的场景,如明亮光线下的黄色花朵。在弱光环境下,清晰度依然很高,许多细节清晰可辨,不过暗部的动态范围可能会更好一些。
广角摄像头拍摄效果不错,但边缘略有变形,在高倍放大时,细节较少。前置摄像头自拍清晰细腻。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantEnvironmentLow lightWide-angle录制的视频最高分辨率可达 8K,每秒 30 帧,4K 每秒可达 120 帧。录制质量非常出色,自动对焦反应灵敏,几乎察觉不到,曝光校正也非常迅速。
色彩还原可以说是略微过度饱和,但总体上与理想状态的偏差很小。


配件和保修 - 包括充电器
包装盒内有充电器、USB 数据线、SIM 卡工具和一个透明硅胶保护套。即使在德国,您也可以在网上找到一些配件,如智能手机保护套。我们的设备贷方 Tradingshenzhen 还提供了一个适用于西方电源插座的适配器。
小米提供 12 个月的 保修.不过,我们建议使用进口商,因为直接运送到中国既有风险又非常昂贵。
输入设备和操作 - 快速触摸屏
由于采用了 300 Hz 采样率,触摸屏输入识别非常准确。120 Hz 的屏幕反应也很迅速,我们还非常喜欢振动电机带来的触觉反馈。
后置 AMOLED 显示屏也很可靠,不过你能用它做的事情并不多:除了相机取景器、时钟和计步器之外,它目前只能显示通知,而且不能直接从屏幕上启动应用程序。
小米的 3D 超声波指纹传感器技术隐藏在正面屏幕后面。它工作可靠,解锁速度非常快。面部识别也可以通过前置摄像头进行。这种方法非常可靠,但安全性较差,而且更容易被操控。
显示屏 - 小米手机采用特殊的子像素布局
6.9 英寸 AMOLED 大屏幕采用 LTPO 技术,可在每秒 1 到 120 帧之间动态调整刷新率。这样在观看静态内容时可以节省能耗,同时确保动态内容的流畅运动跟踪。
从纸面上看,该屏幕的分辨率略低于其他一些手机,但它提供了一个独特的功能:我们的显微镜图像显示了一种不同寻常的子像素排列。这种排列设计使每个像素实际上都能接收到三原色中每一种颜色的全 LED,小米称这使显示屏更加高效。在我们的测试中,图像质量与其他手机一样高。
这款手机的最大亮度接近 1,100 cd/m²,虽然亮度不及某些高端机型,但对于全屏白光来说仍然完全够用。在较小的区域也能达到远高于 3,000 cd/m² 的亮度水平,保证了出色的 HDR 性能。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1099 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.05 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
103% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.232
CCT: 6779 K
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9" | Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9" | Oppo Find X8 Ultra AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | Vivo X200 Ultra AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -13% | -45% | 19% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1099 | 1054 -4% | 1357 23% | 1366 24% | 1286 17% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1067 | 1059 -1% | 1350 27% | 1325 24% | 1238 16% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 93 -2% | 94 -1% | 95 0% | 93 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.05 | 1.57 -50% | 3.1 -195% | 0.88 16% | 1.04 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.38 | 2.8 -18% | 4.7 -97% | 1.55 35% | 2.26 5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.7 -0% | 2.2 -29% | 1.5 12% | 1.6 6% |
| Gamma | 2.232 99% | 2.32 95% | 2 110% | 2.303 96% | 2.249 98% |
| CCT | 6779 96% | 6993 93% | 6391 102% | 6626 98% | 6575 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 122.4 Hz Amplitude: 19 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 122.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 122.4 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
以固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平缓,但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看)。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise | |
| ↘ 33.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 91.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
性能 - 超大功率节流
配备 高通骁龙 8 精英 5 代系统芯片,小米 17 Pro Max 拥有目前最快的Android 智能手机处理器之一。就纯粹的处理能力而言,它确实非常出色,只有当前一代的 iPhone 比它更快。
不过,在系统基准测试中,我们的评测设备偶尔会出现问题,稍稍落后于 小米 17 Pro.我们很快就会在排放测试中看到其中的原因。
在人工智能计算中,这款手机的表现有些不稳定,但总的来说,它跟上了对比设备的步伐。
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (22372 - 23712, n=4) | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=138, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
使用 Adreno 840、你还能获得目前最快的图形解决方案之一,它支持网格着色和光线追踪等现代功能。
不过,在 GPU 基准测试中,小米 17 Pro Max 无法与其他高端智能手机媲美。尽管如此,在现实生活中,这种差异还是不太明显,因为很少有应用程序或游戏能将图形芯片的性能发挥到极致。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
使用小米 17 Pro Max 上网是一种非常快速、轻松的体验,即使是大型网页也几乎可以瞬间加载,一切运行都很流畅。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=155, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 137.4, n=3) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0 | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (593 - 624, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=132, last 2 years) | |
| Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0 | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137) | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (16.5 - 20.9, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=4) | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=148, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 - 99417, n=4) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (306 - 635, n=4) | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132) | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (Chrome 141) | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 26.0) | |
* ... smaller is better
UFS 4.1 存储系统使存储访问速度极快,即使在传输大量小文件时也能显著提高速度。
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Oppo Find X8 Ultra | Vivo X200 Ultra | Average 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -27% | -19% | -18% | -11% | -46% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3971.4 | 3823.28 -4% | 3754.43 -5% | 3358.64 -15% | 3924 ? -1% | 2212 ? -44% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3899.9 | 3361.24 -14% | 3564.22 -9% | 2998.87 -23% | 3845 ? -1% | 1835 ? -53% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 548.4 | 287.85 -48% | 375.9 -31% | 462.41 -16% | 304 ? -45% | 293 ? -47% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 561.3 | 331.61 -41% | 389.28 -31% | 459.33 -18% | 580 ? 3% | 338 ? -40% |
游戏 - 主要以 60fps 的速度玩游戏
小米 17 Pro Max 拥有强大的 CPU 和 GPU,是一款出色的游戏手机。它的长效电池还能确保长时间游戏而无需充电。
在我们测试的几乎所有游戏和模式中,我们都获得了持续稳定的 60fps 帧率。只有在以超高清模式玩《PUBG Mobile》时,我们才发现帧率下降到了 40fps。
我们使用GameBench软件来测量这些帧率。
排放 - 带立体声扬声器的急性子
温度
在负载情况下,手机会明显发热,一段时间后,设备的边框会变得非常热。随后,在我们的压力测试中,手机两次过载,必须冷却后才能继续进行基准测试。
记录到的超过 50°C 的机箱温度非常明显,在较热的环境中可能会更高。
3DMark 压力测试还显示,在持续负载情况下,手机会出现明显的节流现象,在 Wild Life 测试中,手机性能下降了近 40%。
这种极端的节流现象可以解释为什么小米 17 Pro Max 在很多场景下都无法赶上其他手机。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
发言人
底部边缘的扬声器由听筒支撑,当水平握持手机时,它们共同实现了立体声效果。这两个扬声器结合在一起,产生了令人信服的音场效果,但在播放大音量音乐时有时会显得有些紧张。
电影原声一般都不错,并能显示一些低频,但我们建议将音量调低一些,以保持声音更纯净并防止失真。
外置音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 6.0 连接。它支持所有重要的蓝牙音频编解码器,这意味着您可以轻松连接无线设备,并获得良好的音质。
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Vivo X200 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池运行时间 - 超大电池意味着超长运行时间
耗电量
小米 17 Pro Max 相当节能,与小米 17 类似,它的耗电量相对较低,尤其是在负载情况下。在这种使用情况下,你可能会发现手机的性能有些受限。
最大充电功率为 100 瓦。我们的评测设备随附了一个充电器,大容量电池在不到一个小时的时间内就充满了电,至少在启动升压模式时是这样。
无线充电也是可行的,最大功率为 50 瓦。使用数据线可直接从手机为其他设备充电,功率为 22.5 瓦,甚至还可以通过手机本身为耳机无线充电。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max 7500 mAh | Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 4823 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh | Oppo Find X8 Ultra 6100 mAh | Vivo X200 Ultra 6000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | -30% | -29% | -154% | -24% | -34% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.6 | 0.6 -0% | 0.55 8% | 0.8 -33% | 1.6 -167% | 0.733 ? -22% | 0.853 ? -42% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 0.8 | 1.3 -63% | 0.77 4% | 1.1 -38% | 2.9 -263% | 1.433 ? -79% | 1.43 ? -79% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.4 | 1.6 -14% | 0.91 35% | 1.6 -14% | 3.7 -164% | 1.77 ? -26% | 1.609 ? -15% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.5 | 4.1 37% | 13.81 -112% | 8.5 -31% | 10.6 -63% | 5.53 ? 15% | 7.09 ? -9% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 9.1 | 11.5 -26% | 16.69 -83% | 11.8 -30% | 19.5 -114% | 9.9 ? -9% | 11.2 ? -23% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗:Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
功耗:GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
这款手机配备 7500 毫安时超大容量电池。小米采用 L 形电池,由于硅含量较高,因此能量密度特别高。
额外的屏幕优化设计可帮助手机节省更多能源。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,17 Pro Max 的续航时间达到了 33 小时 46 分钟。这甚至比 iPhone 17 Pro Max的续航时间还要长。
不过,这也显示出小米无法与Apple 手机的效率相媲美:由于电池容量不足 5,000 mAh,小米手机的续航时间比 iPhone 短了 15%。
几天没有电源插座对小米 17 Pro Max 来说不成问题,即使在满负荷状态下,也能玩上 5 个多小时的游戏。
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max 7500 mAh | Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 4823 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh | Oppo Find X8 Ultra 6100 mAh | Vivo X200 Ultra 6000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -15% | -26% | -18% | -31% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 70.2 | 45.8 -35% | |||
| H.264 (h) | 34.8 | 32.3 -7% | 33.5 -4% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 33.8 | 28.6 -15% | 22.2 -34% | 22.9 -32% | 23.3 -31% |
| Load (h) | 5.1 | 3.7 -27% |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
小米 17 Pro Max 是一款高品质手机,电池续航时间很长,进口价格相对便宜。
不过,这也带来了一些缺点,手机的主要功能--副屏幕目前只能在有限的应用程序中使用。

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 11/02/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $9.90 Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi... 2. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 3. $9.98 120W USB Type C Fast Chargin... List Price: 940€ | 219 g | 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.90" 2608x1200 416 PPI AMOLED | |
| Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Apple A19 Pro ⎘ Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe | Amazon: 1. $49.99 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Tech... 2. $37.99 Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Sili... 3. $1,419.00 iPhone 17 Pro Max Deep Blue ... List Price: 1449 Euro | 233 g | 256 GB NVMe | 6.90" 2868x1320 460 PPI OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $1,054.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-... 2. $1,157.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra ... 3. $7.57 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... List Price: 1449€ | 218 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.90" 3120x1440 498 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $15.99 AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... 2. $11.02 [1-Pack] for Oppo Find X8 Ul... 3. $10.89 UYRUREL Screen Protector for... List Price: 1050€ | 226 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED | |
| Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $17.24 YQINHHME for Vivo X200 Ultra... 2. $13.92 HGJTFANY [3 Pcs Screen Prote... 3. AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr... List Price: 890€ | 229 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.


























































