关于Vivo X300 FE的总结
vivo 证明，只需做出一些微小的妥协，就能将智能手机的价格降至 1,000 欧元以下，同时仍能保持高端机型的质感。X300 FE 机身小巧，却配备了一块超大容量电池，其续航能力令许多价格高出许多的手机都相形见绌。
其摄像头系统的传感器尺寸虽略小于该品牌旗舰机型，但其中部分传感器的感光度实际上比大尺寸机型更高，在我们的评测中呈现出了非常出色的成像质量。此外，该机型还配备了蔡司超长焦镜头等高端配件。
虽然骁龙 8 Gen 5 并非顶级 SoC，但对于绝大多数任务来说已经绰绰有余。精良的做工和快充功能是其额外优势，高速存储和充裕的 12 GB 内存同样如此。
唯一需要妥协的是缺少高速USB接口，但较长的系统更新周期弥补了这一不足。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
在美国，您需要寻找Vivo X300 FE的进口版，因为该手机在美国并未正式发售。
在世界其他许多地区，这款手机的售价约为1,100美元。
- $14.99QUIETIP Magnetic Case for vivo X300 FE with Screen Protector,[Compatible with MagSafe] Translucent Matte Drop Protection Cover,Black
- $963.30Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 256GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, Sky Blue
- $869.73Samsung Galaxy S26, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 512GB, Powerful Processor, Galaxy AI, Immersive Viewing, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, Black
规格
机身与特点——金属与玻璃材质造就卓越品质
从外观上看，Vivo X300 FE 与其更大尺寸的机型有显著区别：其摄像头模组被安置在一个横跨机身整个宽度的椭圆形边框条内，而非像更大尺寸的 X300 机型那样采用圆形模组。这种设计让人联想到谷歌的 Pixel 智能手机。 蔡司（Zeiss）的标识明确表明，该设备内置了高品质的光学元件。
配色方案包括紫色和深灰色；国际版还提供绿色版本。机身背面采用哑光玻璃材质，搭配金属边框，呈现出极高的质感。 该手机做工非常坚固，在我们的测试中未出现弯曲现象。显示屏周围的窄边框赋予手机现代感。
Vivo X300 FE 重量仅略超过 190 克，轻盈便携，同时具备 IP68/IP69 级别的防尘防水性能。
遗憾的是，它缺少旗舰机型上配备的USB 3.2高速接口；该机型仅支持USB 2.0。它标配512 GB存储空间和12 GB运行内存；在国际市场上，还有一款配备256 GB存储空间的机型可供选择。
沟通与易用性——Lightning ——中国手机上的高速Wi-Fi
该手机支持广泛的 4G 和 5G 频段，让您几乎可以在世界任何地方连接到蜂窝网络。
它配备了高速的 Wi-Fi 7，我们的华硕 RT-BE96U 路由器正是通过这一超高速 Wi-Fi 标准与手机连接的。 这使得传输速度最高可达 1,958 Mbit/s。对于高速家庭网络而言，这绰绰有余，而且在我们的测试中，连接非常稳定。
屏幕刷新率最高可达每秒 120 帧，触摸屏精准且响应迅速，为您的手指带来流畅的滑动体验。
指纹识别器隐藏在屏幕后方相对较高的位置。当手指触碰时，它反应非常迅速，能瞬间解锁手机。此外，还可以使用面部识别功能解锁手机。
| Networking | |
| Vivo X300 FE | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Oppo Find X9s Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
软件与可持续发展——以三星为例的最新动态
这些安全补丁始于2026年5月，大约每两个月更新一次。在网络连接良好的情况下，系统可在几分钟内完成更新。
制造商承诺提供长达七年的更新支持，以及五个新版本的Android 。这一更新周期非常长，可与Apple 或三星相媲美。
包装采用无塑料设计，但除此之外，关于这款智能手机在可持续性方面的信息寥寥无几。
相机——名副其实
主摄像头拥有5000万像素，光圈为f/1.57，具备极高的感光度。它基于索尼IMX921传感器，可拍摄出画质精良的照片，细节清晰锐利，并能准确还原红色或黄色等难以表现的色彩。即使是细微的细节也能清晰可见。
长焦摄像头支持3倍光学变焦；但由于其焦距已是标准摄像头的两倍，因此可实现最高6倍的混合变焦。 在10倍变焦范围内，图像效果非常出色；超过10倍后，AI将接管后处理直至100倍，但这会导致成像不够精准。尽管如此，该功能仍可很好地替代双筒望远镜等设备。
800万像素广角摄像头能拍摄出不错的快照，尽管在细节表现上略显不足。
自拍时可使用5000万像素摄像头。自拍照细节丰富，动态范围表现尚可。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightUltraweitwinkel
显示屏——HDR 和高 PWM 频率
Vivo X300 FE 配备了一块亮度较高的屏幕，尽管其表现尚无法与顶级手机相媲美。
不过，它支持 HDR，色彩还原准确，且 PWM 频率高达 360 Hz 以上，这对对 PWM 敏感的用户来说可能是一大优势。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1096 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.62 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6573 K
| Vivo X300 FE AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Google Pixel 10a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Oppo Find X9s Pro LTPO OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy S26 Dynamic AMOLED 2XDynamic AMOLED 2X, 8 Bit color depth, 2340x1080, 6.3" | OnePlus 15T OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 45% | -17% | 30% | 18% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2035 | 3050 50% | 1769 -13% | 2645 30% | 1745 -14% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 2100 | 2925 39% | 1688 -20% | 2730 30% | 3125 49% |
| Response Times | 1% | -102% | 16% | -292% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.3 ? | 1.42 ? -9% | 3.1 ? -138% | 0.62 ? 52% | 12.4 ? -854% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.1 ? | 1.07 ? 3% | 3 ? -173% | 1.32 ? -20% | 1.2 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 360.9 | 240 | 167.1 | 240 | 120.7 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 16 | 14.71 8% | 15 6% | 13.6 15% | 18 -13% |
| Screen | -34% | -121% | -81% | -118% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1096 | 2205 101% | 1133 3% | 1341 22% | 1119 2% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1063 | 1108 4% | 1337 26% | 1101 4% | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 92 | 96 4% | 96 4% | 96 4% | |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.62 | 1.4 -126% | 2.29 -269% | 2.4 -287% | 2.22 -258% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.53 | 2.3 -50% | 5.32 -248% | 4 -161% | 5.18 -239% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.6 -60% | 3.2 -220% | 1.9 -90% | 3.2 -220% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.229 99% | 2.06 107% | 2.243 98% |
| CCT | 6573 99% | 6715 97% | 7113 91% | 6497 100% | 7147 91% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
-5% | -80% /
-97% | -12% /
-34% | -131% /
-141% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 360.9 Hz Amplitude: 16 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 360.9 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 360.9 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7765 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管在最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来是平的，但这只是由于缩放比例所致。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航——虽未达顶尖水平，但速度非常快
该 骁龙8 Gen 5 的表现仍稍逊于高通的旗舰机型，也无法与 联发科天玑9500，但它仍是一款性能强劲的SoC，能够轻松应对绝大多数任务。
得益于速度极快的UFS 4.1存储，数据传输迅捷，加载时间极短。
在长时间高负载运行下，最高温度可达116.06 °F（46.7 °C），这一温度较为明显，可能会带来问题。长时间使用后，SoC会进行降频，导致性能下降约30%。
底部边缘的扬声器由听筒辅助发声，音量无法调得很高。整体音质均衡，听流行歌曲完全没问题。
电池容量为6,500 mAh，容量相当充裕，但无法与 一加15T，后者容量多出1,000 mAh。
因此，我们在Wi-Fi测试中测得的24小时45分钟续航表现虽好，但称不上出色。Vivo X300 FE支持最高90瓦的有线快充，甚至还支持最高40瓦的无线充电。
| Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total | |
| Vivo X300 FE | |
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (180.6 - 322, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (60.2 - 423, n=126, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo X300 FE | Google Pixel 10a | Oppo Find X9s Pro | Samsung Galaxy S26 | OnePlus 15T | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -42% | -25% | -22% | 29% | -2% | -34% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3752.1 | 1689.27 -55% | 3375.6 -10% | 3923.49 5% | 4115.87 10% | 3645 ? -3% | 2255 ? -40% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3222.5 | 826.38 -74% | 1987.03 -38% | 2718.09 -16% | 4076.12 26% | 3185 ? -1% | 1938 ? -40% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 421.6 | 326.53 -23% | 434.19 3% | 418.42 -1% | 578.74 37% | 414 ? -2% | 311 ? -26% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 508.6 | 430.37 -15% | 239.9 -53% | 124.05 -76% | 721.05 42% | 496 ? -2% | 362 ? -29% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Find X9s Pro | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Vivo X300 FE | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Oppo Find X9s Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
| OnePlus 15T | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Vivo X300 FE | |
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Vivo X300 FE | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Oppo Find X9s Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
Vivo X300 FE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S26 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Vivo X300 FE 6500 mAh | Google Pixel 10a 5100 mAh | Oppo Find X9s Pro 7025 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S26 4300 mAh | OnePlus 15T 7500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -19% | 10% | -29% | 38% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 24.8 | 20 -19% | 27.3 10% | 17.7 -29% | 34.3 38% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 51 | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 28.7 | ||||
| Load (h) | 3.2 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Vivo X300 FE 机身小巧，作为一款高端手机，价格相当实惠。
它功能丰富，电池续航时间长，且摄像头表现出色。
Vivo X300 FE
- 07/06/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 各种可行方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86%  | Vivo X300 FE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 899€ | 190.2 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED |
2. 85.3%  | Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 549€ | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED |
3. 87%  | Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $10.80 linsuyu Case Compatible with... 2. $10.80 Jiajihua Case Compatible wit... 3. $12.80 ShouBao Compatible with Oppo... List Price: 800€ | 198 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.32" 2640x1216 460 PPI LTPO OLED |
4. 88.3%  | Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 960 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 999€ | 167 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.30" 2340x1080 409 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2XDynamic AMOLED 2X, 8 Bit color depth |
5. 86%  | OnePlus 15T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: 1. $434.56 Google Pixel 10a - 30+ Hours... 2. $554.16 Nothing Phone (3) Cell Phone... 3. $268.99 OnePlus 10T, 128GB + 8GB RAM... List Price: 600€ | 194 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.32" 2640x1216 460 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
