小米 15T Pro 评测--拍照手机中被低估的精品

Name: Xiaomi 15T Pro
Brand: Xiaomi

变焦大师

小米 15T Pro 的目标是凭借其多功能摄像头设置在同价位产品中脱颖而出，并在很大程度上取得了成功。此外，它还提供了许多高端功能，尽管在规格列表中仍存在一些不足。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 11/10/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

小米 15T Pro 的评价

小米 15T Pro 延续了 T 系列的优势，将高性能与令人印象深刻的摄像头和超亮显示屏完美结合。在制造质量方面，这款智能手机坚固的机身和 IP68 认证给人留下了深刻印象，而更大的电池和更高效的处理器则大大提高了电池续航时间。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

虽然超广角和数码变焦仍有不足，但与徕卡的合作确保了非常出色的拍照效果。在软件方面，小米凭借较长的更新周期和新的人工智能功能获得了好评，但在可持续性和可维修性方面却落后于竞争对手。此外，USB 2.0 端口速度慢和缺乏 LTPO 面板也值得批评。

Pros

+ 明亮准确的显示屏

+ 快速 SoC

+ 通过 IP68 认证

+ 使用或不使用数据线快速充电

Cons

- 仅 USB 2.0

- 弱超广角摄像头

- 只有 12 个月保修

- 无 LTPO 面板

价格和供应情况

小米 15T Pro 可直接从小米商城购买，也可从Amazon和MediaMarkt.这款智能手机于 2025 年 9 月在全球上市，起售价约为 799.99 欧元（约合 925 美元）。美国官方尚未公布该产品的上市时间，但可通过第三方进口商以类似的价格购买。各地区的供货情况和保修条件可能有所不同。

$7.99

Suttkue for Xiaomi 15T Pro Screen Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim,Anti-Scratch (2 +2PACK)

$7.29
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for Xiaomi 15T/Xiaomi 15T Pro Screen Protector Tempered glass film.Anti-Breakage.Anti-Scratch No Bubbles 9H Hardness.Easy Installation for Xiaomi 15T Pro/15T
$7.59
Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 15T/15T Pro Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector,Full Coverage 9H Tempered Glass Film,HD Clear Scratch Resistant,Bubble-Free for Xiaomi 15T Screen Protector

小米 15T Pro 的评价
规格 - 小米 15T Pro
外壳 - 小米 15T Pro 通过 IP68 认证
功能 - 15T 系列仅支持 USB 2.0
软件 - 15T Pro 六年更新一次
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 Wi-Fi 7 的小米智能手机
电话和通话质量 - 支持离线通信
摄像头--小米 15T Pro 的配置表现强劲
配件和保修 - 可选的小米贴心服务
输入设备和操作 - 配备快速指纹传感器的 15T Pro
显示屏--小米 15T Pro 采用极亮的 AMOLED 显示屏
性能 - 配备 Dimensity 9400+ 的小米智能手机
排放 - 配备双扬声器的智能手机
电池寿命 - 5,500 毫安时智能手机
Notebookcheck 总体评分
替代品一览

小米 15T Pro 是小米 15T Pro 的升级版。小米 15T的继任者小米 14T Pro.作为小米去年的紧凑型旗舰产品，它与徕卡（Leica）合作开发的强大相机配置已经脱颖而出，今年继续保持这一合作关系。在 Pro 机型上，小米更加强调长焦镜头的改进，同时还提供了比 15T 更多的其他优势。

规格 - 小米 15T Pro

Xiaomi 15T Pro (15 Series)

Processor

Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ 8 x - 3.7 GHz, Cortex-X925, X4, A720

Graphics adapter

ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.83 inch 19.49:9, 2772 x 1280 pixel 447 PPI, Capacitive Touchschreen, AMOLED, 480 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, Wet Touch, DC Dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

1TB UFS 4.1 Flash, 1024 GB

, 995.2 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Electronic Compass, Flicker, Colour Temperature, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2g (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.96 x 162.7 x 77.9

Battery

5500 mAh Lithium-Ion, PD 2.0 / 3.0; Battery Cycles: 1,600

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (OV Light Fusion 900, f/1.62, 23 mm, OIS) + 12 MPix (OV13b, Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 15 mm) + 50 MPix (Samung JN5, f/3.0, 115 mm, OIS); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (Samsung S5KKDS, f/2.2, 21 mm)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, USB Cable, SIM Tool, Case, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V5 | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM: Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 22.38 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 [USB 3.2 Gen 2]); Supported file systems for external storage: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body SAR: 0.994 W/kg, Head SAR: 0.989 W/kg | Maximum charging speed: 90 W (wired) / 50 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof

Weight

210 g

Price

1000 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - 小米 15T Pro 通过 IP68 认证

小米 15T Pro 有黑色、灰色和摩卡金三种颜色。该机重 210 克，重量不算特别轻，厚度略低于 8 毫米（实测：8.15 毫米；含摄像头：11.4 毫米）。

小米重新设计了外观，尤其是摄像头模块周围，使这款智能手机的外观更显高档。制造质量很好，铝制边框感觉很牢固。不过，过渡到玻璃纤维复合材料的背面触感明显，略显粗糙。显示屏由康宁大猩猩 7i 玻璃保护。

当受到轻微扭转时，15T Pro 会发出微弱的吱吱声，但总体感觉还是很结实。SIM 卡托盘与边框齐平，智能手机通过了 IP68 认证，确保防尘防水。

尺寸比较

功能 - 15T 系列仅支持 USB 2.0

小米 15T Pro 有三种配置：

12 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储| €800 （约合 870 美元）

12GB 内存 / 512GB 存储空间| 900 欧元（约合 980 美元）

12GB内存/1TB存储空间| €1,000（约合1,090美元）

除内部存储空间外，两款机型没有任何区别。考虑到价格区间，我们希望能看到一个速度更快的 USB 端口，但除此之外，该产品的功能设置基本齐全。虽然包括 Auracast，但不支持 UWB。

软件 - 15T Pro 六年更新一次

小米 15T Pro 最初搭载的是Android 15 和 HyperOS 2.0，但在我们测试结束时，它已经升级到了谷歌Android 16 和HyperOS 3.0。.

新版本不仅在设计上进行了改进，还能更方便地与Apple 设备进行数据交换，增加了超级岛功能，增强了人工智能功能，改进了图库搜索等。

小米承诺 6 年安全更新和 5 年主要操作系统升级。

可持续性

小米没有提供有关该智能手机可持续性的具体信息。该设备的包装基本不使用塑料。

不支持用户维修，手机只能送修或送到授权服务合作伙伴处维修。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 Wi-Fi 7 的小米智能手机

小米 15T Pro 配备了包括 Wi-Fi 7 和 5G 在内的现代连接模块，支持所有地区的广泛频段。城市地区的移动接收能力很强，几乎没有什么不足之处。

Networking
Xiaomi 15T Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	967 (min: 933) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	897 (min: 548) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1905 (min: 1867) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	919 (min: 708) MBit/s ∼54%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	987 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	863 (min: 749) MBit/s ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼71%
Nothing Phone (3) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	980 (min: 492) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	834 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1856 (min: 1764) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1577 (min: 1279) MBit/s ∼93%
Realme GT 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	976 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	939 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼81%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	986 (min: 498) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	931 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1894 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1695 (min: 1643) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1093 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1293 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1446 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	719 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	746 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼83%

Xiaomi 15T Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1905 (1867-1952)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (984-1422)

Xiaomi 15T Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø917 (708-978)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1202 (1187-1213)

Xiaomi 15T Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø967 (933-991)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1072 (655-1214)

Xiaomi 15T Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø894 (548-929)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1153 (1048-1191)

在室外获取卫星非常快速准确，而在室内则需要较长的时间，但最终会确定一个精确的位置。

在一次骑车过程中，我们将小米 15T Pro 与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。有时，智能手机记录的轨迹与实际路线略有偏差，但对于导航任务来说并没有实际限制。

电话和通话质量 - 支持离线通信

小米 15T Pro 支持两张 Nano SIM 卡，其中一张可更换为 eSIM 卡。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。新增加的离线通信功能允许兼容设备（目前仅限于 15T 系列）之间进行语音通话，通话距离最远可达 1.9 公里。不过，SIM 卡和蓝牙仍必须处于激活状态，而且智能手机必须与小米账户关联。

将手机贴在耳边时，通过移动网络的通话质量非常好，不过并不能完全过滤掉嘈杂的环境噪音。扬声器模式也表现不错，不过 15T Pro 用户的声音听起来略有回音。

摄像头--小米 15T Pro 的配置表现强劲

小米 15T Pro 的高分辨率前置摄像头没有使用像素二进制，这导致自拍照相对较大，最大可达 20 MB。不过，这并不影响低光性能，因为小米避免了过度增亮。在日光条件下，该相机可拍摄出迷人的照片，视频录制速度可达 4K（30 帧/秒）。

主摄像头是与徕卡合作开发的，成像效果不错。不过，在近距离拍摄时应注意，因为自动模式会迅速切换到虚化模式，这也会导致不必要的模糊。在弱光环境下，曝光时间相对较长（长达三秒），但效果不错。超广角镜头（也可用作微距镜头）在细节和边缘像差方面都存在不足。变焦效果不错，但在数字范围内会显得有些做作。

可进行 8K（30 帧/秒）和最高 120 帧/秒的超高清视频拍摄。不过，如果您想使用所有镜头，录制速度只能达到 4K/60fps。即使在近距离视频拍摄中，我们也能观察到明显的虚化效果。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - 可选的小米贴心服务

小米 15T Pro 随附一个深灰色硅胶保护壳、一条 USB 数据线（Type-A 转 Type-C）和一个 SIM 卡工具。在欧洲必须单独购买兼容的快速充电器。

在德国的保修期仅为 12 个月，不影响经销商保修.可选择购买为期两年的小米关怀保险套餐，涵盖意外损坏（89 欧元/约 95 美元）或盗窃（119 欧元/约 125 美元）。

输入设备和操作 - 配备快速指纹传感器的 15T Pro

电容式触摸屏预装了屏幕保护膜，滑动性能不错，但容易刮花。屏幕下方的玻璃则耐用得多，手感也明显更顺滑。

显示屏上集成了光学指纹传感器，可快速解锁智能手机，识别率高。通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别也可作为附加或替代选项。

线性振动电机可提供强烈而清晰的反馈，并可在设置中进行调整。

显示屏--小米 15T Pro 采用极亮的 AMOLED 显示屏

小米 15T Pro 的 AMOLED 显示屏尺寸为 6.83 英寸（17.35 厘米），分辨率为 1280p，刷新率高达 144 Hz。不过，由于不是 LTPO 面板，刷新率只能降至 60 Hz。

亮度非常高，在全屏白色区域（显示屏中央）达到 1,889 cd/m² 的短期峰值，然后在不到 30 秒后降至 1,064 cd/m²。在较小的白色区域（APL18），屏幕保持稳定的 3,269 cd/m²，而 HDR 视频播放则高达 2,868 cd/m²。

根据规格，15T Pro 采用直流调光。但在示波器下，它和小米 15T 一样，实际上采用的是高频 PWM 调光。虽然敏感用户可能仍会感到轻微不适，但该面板总体上还是比较容易入眼的。


1078 cd/m²	1065 cd/m²	1064 cd/m²
1071 cd/m²	1064 cd/m²	1072 cd/m²
1073 cd/m²	1067 cd/m²	1063 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1078 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1068.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1064 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6578 K

	Xiaomi 15T Pro AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8"	Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Flow AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Nothing Phone (3) AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.7"	Realme GT 7 OLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"	Xiaomi 14T Pro AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen		25%	-13%	-21%	34%	17%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1064	1846 73%	1371 29%	1548 45%	1519 43%	953 -10%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1069	1850 73%	1370 28%	1535 44%	1530 43%	961 -10%
Brightness Distribution (%)	99	93 -6%	96 -3%	98 -1%	97 -2%	95 -4%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	1.2 8%	2.7 -108%	2.2 -69%	1 23%	0.9 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.4	2.9 15%	4.2 -24%	5.5 -62%	1.7 50%	1.5 56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	2.3 -15%	2 -0%	3.7 -85%	1.1 45%	1.2 40%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.25 ^98%	2.03 ^108%	2.26 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6578 ^99%	6707 ^97%	6450 ^101%	6787 ^96%	6661 ^98%	6580 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	3269 cd/m²
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3192 cd/m² -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2695 cd/m² -18%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1523 cd/m² -53%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1517 cd/m² -54%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3177 cd/m² +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2900 cd/m² +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	2868 cd/m²
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1485 cd/m² -48%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1475 cd/m² -49%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 17.15 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

我们使用 Calman 测试了显示器的色彩和灰度还原能力，结果非常好。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.546 ms rise
1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.556 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.501 ms rise
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5065 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

在户外，小米 15T Pro 给人的印象非常好，即使在明亮的阳光下也能保持良好的可读性。只是从侧面看时，反光会让人分心。

视角稳定性也令人信服。在非常浅的角度下，会出现细微的绿色色调，亮度也会略有降低。

性能 - 配备 Dimensity 9400+ 的小米智能手机

小米 15T Pro 采用联发科 Dimensity 9400+搭配 12GB 内存，系统运行流畅，整体性能强劲。

在基准测试中，它取得了不错的成绩，但略微落后于采用相同 SoC 的其他设备，显示出早期热节流现象。

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3136 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2959 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2309 Points -12%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2478 - 2798, n=5)	2657 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2624 Points
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2265 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	2212 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2187 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=213, last 2 years)	1731 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10029 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	8711 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	8154 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (7749 - 9043, n=5)	8195 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	7749 Points
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	7439 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	7161 Points -8%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	6972 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=213, last 2 years)	5061 Points -35%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2674793 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (2396591 - 2841845, n=5)	2571979 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	2483050 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2271821 Points -9%
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2147494 Points -14%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2088406 Points -16%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	1975046 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=155, last 2 years)	1456119 Points -41%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20673 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	19622 Points +16%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (16985 - 18344, n=4)	17710 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	16985 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	16053 Points -5%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	15928 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=191, last 2 years)	14711 Points -13%
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	13240 Points -22%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	13223 Points +68%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	11976 Points +52%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (7887 - 12637, n=5)	11338 Points +44%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	11280 Points +43%
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	10673 Points +35%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	9953 Points +26%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	7887 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14076, n=149, last 2 years)	7494 Points -5%
System
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17481 Points +75%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	16698 Points +67%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	15367 Points +54%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (9986 - 16550, n=5)	13968 Points +40%
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	12209 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=149, last 2 years)	11236 Points +13%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	11169 Points +12%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	9986 Points
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	16264 Points +108%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	13961 Points +78%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	13711 Points +75%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (7836 - 13578, n=5)	11476 Points +46%
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	11341 Points +45%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	11254 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=149, last 2 years)	8485 Points +8%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	7836 Points
Graphics
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	58323 Points +118%
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	53763 Points +101%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (26748 - 55810, n=5)	49322 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	45691 Points +71%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	40323 Points +51%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	33672 Points +26%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	26748 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=149, last 2 years)	25088 Points -6%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2353 Points +27%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1849 - 2267, n=5)	2138 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	2037 Points +10%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	1869 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	1849 Points
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1754 Points -5%
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	1743 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=149, last 2 years)	1677 Points -9%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1042 - 1233, n=5)	1161 Points +11%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	1042 Points
Average of class Smartphone (81 - 5210, n=48, last 2 years)	880 Points -16%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	451 Points -57%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (8659 - 9597, n=5)	9081 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	8818 Points
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=48, last 2 years)	4129 Points -53%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	451 Points -95%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (11834 - 13099, n=5)	12428 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	12177 Points
Average of class Smartphone (133 - 49889, n=48, last 2 years)	5873 Points -52%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	997 Points -92%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	12578 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288	12506 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10534 Points -16%
Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	9538 Points -24%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (1945 - 12713, n=5)	8349 Points -33%
Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288	7302 Points -42%
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735, Adreno 825, 16384	5828 Points -53%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22149, n=71, last 2 years)	4454 Points -64%

撠 Immortalis-G925 MC12负责图形处理，支持基于硬件的光线追踪，性能强劲。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6885 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6036 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	5824 Points
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5466 Points -6%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4490 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3866 Points -34%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7029 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5907 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	5706 Points
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5300 Points -7%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4529 Points -21%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3808 Points -33%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26616 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	22957 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	22436 Points
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18461 Points -18%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	17885 Points -20%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	13588 Points -39%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12400 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11251 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	10286 Points
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8357 Points -19%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8165 Points -21%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6984 Points -32%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12747 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11553 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	10948 Points
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8624 Points -21%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8407 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6932 Points -37%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2525 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2295 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	2249 Points
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1775 Points -21%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1525 Points -32%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	1499 Points -33%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2698 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2343 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	2305 Points
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1784 Points -23%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1574 Points -32%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	1565 Points -32%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	831 fps +15%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	738 fps +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	725 fps
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	702 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	697 fps -4%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	585 fps -19%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65 fps -46%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	478 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	450 fps +35%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	364 fps +9%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	334 fps
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	332 fps -1%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps -34%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	284 fps +7%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	283 fps +6%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	269 fps +1%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	266 fps
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	253 fps -5%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	201 fps -24%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +35%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps +21%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	94 fps +6%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	89 fps
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -33%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -33%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	178 fps +46%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	164 fps +34%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	144 fps +18%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	143 fps +17%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	142 fps +16%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	122 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +40%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps +6%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	88 fps +2%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	86 fps
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -30%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -30%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps +34%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	94 fps +18%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	94 fps +18%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	80 fps
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	79 fps -1%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	75 fps -6%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +3%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +3%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	116 fps
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -48%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -48%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	286 fps +42%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	248 fps +23%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	236 fps +17%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	208 fps +3%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	201 fps
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	187 fps -7%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +37%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	43 fps +13%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	42 fps +11%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	38 fps
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35 fps -8%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	34 fps -11%

Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	334.386 Points +167%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)	243.318 Points +94%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)	232.968 Points +86%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (125.3 - 272, n=3)	175.7 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=156, last 2 years)	152.8 Points +22%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)	144.405 Points +15%
Xiaomi 15T Pro (Chrome 141)	125.306 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	77.674 Points -38%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	239 Points +119%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)	163 Points +50%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (109 - 235, n=5)	160.8 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=150, last 2 years)	144.7 Points +33%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)	137 Points +26%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)	119 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15T Pro (Chrome 141)	109 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	78 Points -28%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	98817 Points +192%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)	94853 Points +180%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)	71875 Points +112%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (33868 - 94555, n=5)	58165 Points +72%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=203, last 2 years)	48356 Points +43%
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)	46162 Points +36%
Xiaomi 15T Pro (Chrome 141)	33868 Points
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	25646 Points -24%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi 14T Pro (Chrome 129)	2123.5 ms * -86%
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)	1182 ms * -4%
Xiaomi 15T Pro (Chrome 141)	1140.4 ms *
Realme GT 7 (Chrome 137)	897.5 ms * +21%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (391 - 1140, n=5)	707 ms * +38%
Nothing Phone (3) (Chrome 138.0.7204.179)	521.2 ms * +54%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)	388.7 ms * +66%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra (Chrome 134)	382.9 ms * +66%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi 15T Pro	Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy S25+	Nothing Phone (3)	Realme GT 7	Xiaomi 14T Pro	Average 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		67%	51%	110%	111%	153%	71%	24%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3219.93	4002.68 24%	4057.35 26%	3720.79 16%	3849.12 20%	3687.54 15%	3689 ?(3220 - 3971, n=3) 15%	2211 ?(270 - 4370, n=194, last 2 years) -31%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3593.03	3464.43 -4%	3311.02 -8%	3270.73 -9%	3442.58 -4%	3908.34 9%	3761 ?(3593 - 3900, n=3) 5%	1827 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=194, last 2 years) -49%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	426.1	311.24 -27%	294.51 -31%	438.57 3%	444.28 4%	441.21 4%	344 ?(58.8 - 548, n=3) -19%	294 ?(47.6 - 548, n=194, last 2 years) -31%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	110.46	411.78 273%	351.16 218%	585.11 430%	578.79 424%	752.87 582%	423 ?(110.5 - 598, n=3) 283%	337 ?(9.4 - 964, n=194, last 2 years) 205%

排放 - 配备双扬声器的智能手机

温度

在持续负载的情况下，表面温度可高达 48.5 °C。不过，由于热点位于摄像头旁边，因此在日常使用中不会感到不适。

SoC 确实会出现明显的节流现象，不过在实际使用中很少能感觉到。

Max. Load

Idle


44.9 °C	45.3 °C	44.4 °C
45.6 °C	45.4 °C	43.5 °C
45.9 °C	45.8 °C	43.8 °C

Maximum: 45.9 °C
Average: 45 °C


41.8 °C	43.8 °C	43.6 °C
40.4 °C	44.5 °C	48.5 °C
40 °C	44.4 °C	46.2 °C

Maximum: 48.5 °C
Average: 43.7 °C

Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.5 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	99.5 % +40%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	70.9 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	64.6 % -9%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63.8 % -10%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	59 % -17%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.4 % -25%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	73.3 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	70.1 % -4%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 % -6%
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65.9 % -10%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61.9 % -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.3 % -30%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	99.1 % +29%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	77.2 % 0%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	77 %
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	74.5 % -3%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	69.6 % -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.9 % -24%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Realme GT 7 Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9400e, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	99.3 % +45%
Xiaomi 14T Pro Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	79.3 % +16%
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	70.8 % +3%
Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	68.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.5 % -3%
Nothing Phone (3) Adreno 825, SD 8s Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.9 % -15%

Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø24.1 (21.9-29.9)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.5 (19.9-38.9)

Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø69.9 (62.5-88.1)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84.2 (71.3-133.4)

Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø23.6 (21.6-28.1)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.9 (21.4-36.3)

Xiaomi 15T Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 1TB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.1: Ø10.6 (9.35-13.6)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12 (10.9-16.3)

发言人

小米 15T Pro 的两个扬声器可以发出相当大的音量，不过在音量较大时声音会变得有些尖锐。在较低的音量下，手机能提供更均衡的音效。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi 15T Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 5,500 毫安时智能手机

耗电量

能效比上一代电池容量增至电池容量增至 5,500 mAh。

支持高达 90 瓦的有线充电。使用兼容的电源适配器，充满电仅需 37 分钟（15 分钟充满 50%，27 分钟充满 80%）。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.13 Watt
Idle	0.83 / 1.06 / 1.09 Watt
Load	5.93 / 11.32 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi 15T Pro 5500 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra 5300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	Nothing Phone (3) 5150 mAh	Realme GT 7 7000 mAh	Xiaomi 14T Pro 5000 mAh	Average Mediatek Dimensity 9400+	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-12%	-30%	25%	2%	-14%	-163%	-21%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.83	0.89 -7%	0.45 46%	0.4 52%	0.8 4%	0.95 -14%	2.21 ?(0.83 - 3.9, n=5) -166%	0.853 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=162, last 2 years) -3%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.06	1.19 -12%	1.09 -3%	0.7 34%	0.93 12%	1.2 -13%	4.02 ?(1.06 - 6.31, n=5) -279%	1.43 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=162, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.09	1.22 -12%	1.13 -4%	1.21 -11%	1.19 -9%	1.27 -17%	4.17 ?(1.09 - 6.35, n=5) -283%	1.609 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=162, last 2 years) -48%
Load Average * (Watt)	5.93	8.76 -48%	14.41 -143%			5.95 -0%	10.2 ?(5.93 - 12.5, n=5) -72%	7.09 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=142, last 2 years) -20%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.32	9.3 18%	16.37 -45%			14.02 -24%	13.2 ?(11.1 - 15.8, n=5) -17%	11.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=142, last 2 years) 1%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.21 (1.001-11.4)

Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.29 (0.962-16.7)

Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.778 (0.732-0.987)

Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.789 (0.745-1.044)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.4 (9.7-11.2)

Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.6 (12.6-14.7)

Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.778 (0.732-0.987)

Xiaomi 14T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.789 (0.745-1.044)

电池寿命

更高的效率和更大的电池组合也带来了更长的运行时间。在我们的 Wi-Fi 实际测试中，小米 15T Pro 实现了近 21 小时的续航。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 141)		20h 54min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi 15T Pro 5500 mAh	20.9 h
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra 5300 mAh	18.4 h
Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh	19.8 h
Nothing Phone (3) 5150 mAh	18.4 h
Realme GT 7 7000 mAh	23.8 h
Xiaomi 14T Pro 5000 mAh	18.7 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 15T Pro 凭借强大的摄像头、绚丽的显示屏和超长的电池续航时间给人留下了深刻印象，但由于缺乏 LTPO、USB 端口速度慢以及可维修性有限等原因，它未能发挥出旗舰机的全部潜能。

Back to the verdict

Xiaomi 15T Pro - 11/06/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

89%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

55 / 69 → 80%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

91%

Games Performance

43 / 55 → 79%

Application Performance

72 / 85 → 85%

AI Performance

75%

Temperature

84%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 87%

Camera

85%

Average

72%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
90%

Power Use
97.7%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
94.5%

Total Sustainability Score: 57.9%

替代品一览

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 86.1%	Xiaomi 15T Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi 15T Pro S... 2. $7.29 Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for... 3. $7.59 Natbok 2+2 Pack for Xiaomi 1... List Price: 1000€	210 g	1TB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED
2. 85.3%	Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $579.99 XIAOMI Poco F7 PRO 5G + 4G L... 2. $10.79 Ibywind For Xiaomi Poco F7 U... 3. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco F7 P... List Price: 800€	212 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.67" 3200x1440 526 PPI Flow AMOLED
3. 88.4%	Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $7.98 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 2. $7.98 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 3. $17.99 SPIDERCASE Magnetic for Sams... List Price: 1149 Euro	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4. 84.8%	Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SM8735 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 825 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: $764.00 List Price: 899 Euro	218 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67" 2800x1260 460 PPI AMOLED
5. 83.2%	Realme GT 7 Mediatek Dimensity 9400e ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $8.99 Suttkue for Realme GT 7 Scre... 2. $10.79 Ibywind For Realme GT 7/GT 7... 3. $7.99 Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible ...	206 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.78" 2780x1264 450 PPI OLED

小米 15T Pro 评测--拍照手机中被低估的精品

变焦大师

小米 15T Pro 的评价

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格 - 小米 15T Pro

外壳 - 小米 15T Pro 通过 IP68 认证

尺寸比较

功能 - 15T 系列仅支持 USB 2.0

软件 - 15T Pro 六年更新一次

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 Wi-Fi 7 的小米智能手机

电话和通话质量 - 支持离线通信

摄像头--小米 15T Pro 的配置表现强劲

配件和保修 - 可选的小米贴心服务

输入设备和操作 - 配备快速指纹传感器的 15T Pro

显示屏--小米 15T Pro 采用极亮的 AMOLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备 Dimensity 9400+ 的小米智能手机

排放 - 配备双扬声器的智能手机

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Xiaomi 15T Pro audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis

电池寿命 - 5,500 毫安时智能手机

耗电量

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

替代品一览

More articles related to this device

Transparency