Notebookcheck Logo
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）

配备 Bose 低音炮的平价旗舰--小米 Poco F8 Ultra 评测

真正的旗舰杀手？

Poco F8 Ultra 不仅以其引人注目的设计脱颖而出，而且还是首款配备 Bose 调谐音频和额外低音炮的智能手机。再加上各种高端功能和当前的骁龙 SoC，问题来了：为什么要多花钱？
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

判决

Poco F8 Ultra 定位高端智能手机，配备了功能强大的 SoC。它还配备了明亮且色彩准确的 120-Hz AMOLED 显示屏、稳固的三摄像头设置、USB 3.2 支持、IP68 认证、6500 毫安时电池以及有线和无线快速充电功能。此外，该设备还能提供出色的 Bose 音效。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

尽管如此，该手机的显示屏没有采用省电的 LTPO 技术，缺少 6 GHz Wi-Fi，而且在持续的压力测试中显示出明显的发热现象。对软件更新的支持也可以更慷慨一些。

尽管存在这些不足，但 Poco F8 Ultra 的整体性能非常强劲，在同价位产品中几乎不存在直接竞争。

Pros

+ 快速 SoC
+ 良好的摄像头设置
+ 通过 IP68 认证
+ 由 Bose 调校的出色 2.1 音频系统
+ 大容量电池，可快速充电

Cons

- 无 6 GHz Wi-Fi
- 持续负载下会产生大量热量
- 无 LTPO 面板

价格和供应情况

Poco F8 Ultra 可直接从小米官方在线商店以及亚马逊和Galaxus 等零售商处购买。

Amazon Logo
$8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 Ultra 5G Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim, Case Friendly, Anti-Fingerprint,Anti-Scratch (2+2 PACK)
  • $8.99
    Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 Ultra Screen Protector(1 pack) Tempered Glass flim with case,9H Hardness,Anti-Scratch, Case Friendly, Bubble Free,HD Clear
  • $9.90
    Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 5G Privacy Tempered Glass Screen Protector and Camera Lens Protector, Anti-Spy 9H Hardness Case Friendly Film

第二款 Ultra 机型很快推出，Poco F8 Ultra 取代了其前代机型。前代仅仅过了八个月左右。不过，Poco 试图让买家放心，并表示这种加快发布周期的做法只是一次性的战略调整，而不是对公司内部发布日程表的永久性改变。

遗憾的是，小米还提高了价格。Poco F8 Ultra 再次推出两种存储配置：12 GB/256 GB（建议零售价：830 欧元）和 16 GB/512 GB（建议零售价：900 欧元），与上一代产品相比，价格分别上涨了 80 欧元和 100 欧元。在撰写本文时，官方尚未公布已确认的美国定价。

规格 - Poco F8 Ultra

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Poco F8 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8 x 3.6 - 4.6 GHz
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 840
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x @ 9600 Mbps
Display
6.90 inch 19.56:9, 2608 x 1200 pixel 416 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Touch sampling rate: 480 Hz (instant: 2560 Hz), Wet Touch 2.0, Poco Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 476.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, proximity, gyroscope, compass, flicker, colour, USB OTG, IR blaster
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, (70M), 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, (70M), 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 163.33 x 77.82
Battery
6500 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-carbon anode, USB Power Delivery 2.0 / 3.0, reverse charging up to 22.5 W, battery cycles: 1,000
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Light Fusion 950, 1/1.31", f/1.67, 23 mm, 1G + 6P, OIS) + 50 MP (5× optical zoom, f/3.0, 115 mm, 4P, OIS) + 50 MP (ultra-wide, f/2.4, 18 mm); Camera2 API level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 22 / 27 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual speakers + subwoofer, sound by Bose, SIM eject tool, USB-C cable, case, HyperOS 3.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth audio codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, LHDC 5.0 | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM: Widevine L1 | SIM: up to 2 eSIMs, up to 2 nano-SIMs | Protection: IP68 | USB copy test: 768.14 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7, USB 3.2 Gen 2) | Supported file systems (external storage): FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | SAR: body 0.997 W/kg, head 0.994 W/kg | Maximum charging speed: 100 W (wired) / 50 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof
Released
11/26/2025
Weight
220 g
Price
900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护壳 - Poco F8 Ultra 依赖于 Poco Shield 玻璃

Poco F8 Ultra 有黑色和牛仔蓝两种颜色可供选择。黑色机型的边框为哑光黑色，后面板由玻璃纤维复合材料制成。相比之下，蓝色款则使用了硅树脂纳米材料，旨在模仿牛仔布的外观，搭配哑光银色铝合金边框。机身标称厚度为 8.3 毫米，我们已经证实了这一点。包括相机模块在内，厚度增加到 11.9 毫米。

整体看来，制造质量很高。牛仔布风格的后面板具有粗糙的纹理，提供了非常好的握持感，不过触摸起来更像是橡胶而非织物。面板间隙紧密均匀，智能手机在受到扭转应力时仅表现出极小的吱吱声。此外，该设备还通过了 IP68 标准认证，可以防尘防水。正面由 Poco 自主研发的 Poco Shield 玻璃提供保护。

(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
(图片来源：丹尼尔-施密特）
附带保护套（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
附带保护套（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

尺寸比较

❌
163.33 mm 77.82 mm 8.3 mm 220 g162.7 mm 77.1 mm 8.8 mm 223 g162.8 mm 77.6 mm 8.2 mm 218 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.6 mm 207 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - 配备快速 USB 3.2 接口的 Poco 智能手机

与 专业版Poco F8 Ultra 采用快速 USB 3.2 端口，支持有线图像输出。拷贝测试中的高传输速率（768.14 MB/s）实际上有利于更快的 Gen 2 标准。

不出所料，该设备没有音频插孔，也不支持 microSD。它支持小米的离线通信，但不支持 UWB。

软件 - 六年更新

Poco F8 Ultra 预装了谷歌Android 16 和小米 HyperOS 3.0。根据制造商的说法，它将获得四年的Android 版本更新和两年的安全补丁。考虑到该设备的高端定位，更长的软件支持时间本是可取的。

小米的 HyperAI 功能也包括在内。不过，该系统预装了大量第三方应用程序和广告。虽然这些应用程序可以轻松删除，但我们将在另一篇文章中介绍如何禁用系统广告。

可持续性

公司网站上只有关于可持续发展的一般信息，但没有关于智能手机的完整报告。外包装基本上不使用塑料，但采用了收缩包装。

不计划由用户进行维修。

通信 - 双频全球导航卫星系统和 5G Sub6

Poco F8 Ultra 支持所有现代移动通信标准，频段宽广，在测试中显示出良好的接收特性，即使在国外也是如此。

WLAN 支持当前的 Wi-Fi 7，但不支持快速的 6 GHz 频段。不过，5 GHz 的传输速率达到了预期水平，而且非常稳定。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼85%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼90%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
916 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1571 MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1742 (min: 1566) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
941 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1063 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1277 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1471 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
705 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
728 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1319 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1392 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼80%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (798-1853)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1289-1530)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø973 (488-1013)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1806 (1767-1846)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø945 (814-965)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (744-1523)
GPS 测试：室内
室内
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动

在室外，卫星锁定非常迅速。在室内，获取时间稍长，但仍然相对较快。

在一次自行车旅行中，智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2.虽然健身智能手表的准确度略高，但两款设备的表现相差无几。不过，Poco F8 Ultra 的整体表现还是非常不错的。

全球导航卫星系统试运行：湖泊
全球导航卫星系统试运行：湖泊
全球导航卫星系统试驾：城市
全球导航卫星系统试驾：城市
全球导航卫星系统试运行：总结
全球导航卫星系统试运行：总结

电话和通话质量 - 配备双 eSIM 卡的 F8 Ultra

将 Poco F8 Ultra 放在耳边时，它在安静环境中的语音质量非常好，给人留下了深刻印象，但噪音抑制效果一般，在繁忙的道路上可能会导致掉线。集成扬声器可确保稳定的通话音量，不会产生明显的混响效果。

双卡支持包括两张 nano-SIM 卡或两张 eSIM 卡，包括混合组合；还提供 VoLTE、Wi-Fi 通话和 Vo5G 功能，并在测试中稳定运行。

摄像头 - Poco F8 Ultra 配备三个 5000 万像素传感器

与 Poco F8 Ultra 自拍
与 Poco F8 Ultra 自拍

虽然 Poco F8 Ultra 的前置摄像头分辨率很高，但它没有使用像素分档，只有在 4:3 宽高比下才能获得完整的像素数量，而在默认的 16:9 宽高比下，像素数量会减少到 2400 万像素。在日光下，图像连贯、悦目，但在弱光下，细节会很早丢失。

主摄像头采用全新的Light Fusion 950传感器，其均衡的图像构图令人印象深刻，即使在昏暗的光线下也能拍摄出出色的照片。在测试中，超广角没有出现畸变，但清晰度可以再提高一些。光学变焦效果也不错，还可用作微距镜头（最小距离：30 厘米）。主传感器和变焦传感器均可使用 OIS。

F8 Ultra 可拍摄 30 FPS 的 8k 或 60 FPS 的 4k。借助 ShootSteady，图像防抖特别流畅，但只能在 2.8k/30FPS 下工作。前置摄像头仅限于 4k（30 FPS）。

5x（115 毫米）
10 倍（230 毫米）
30x（690 毫米）
60x（1380 毫米）
100倍（最大2300毫米）

放大

23 毫米
46 毫米
115 毫米
230 毫米
23 毫米
23 毫米
115 毫米
115 毫米
115 毫米
46 毫米
23 毫米
23 毫米
23 毫米
115 毫米
115 毫米
23 毫米
23 毫米
23 毫米

更多图片样本（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
10.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra: 8.59 ∆E min: 1.74 - max: 15.16 ∆E
ColorChecker
17 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
27 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
27.5 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
26 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
27 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra: 23.12 ∆E min: 12.23 - max: 33.33 ∆E

配件和保修--可选小米关怀计划

Poco F8 Ultra 的供货范围包括一条 USB 数据线（Type-A 转 Type-C）、一个 SIM 卡弹出工具和一个黑色硅胶保护套。

该智能手机享有 12 个月的制造商保修，但不影响 销售商法定保修适用于购买国。用户还可选择购买小米公司的小米关怀保险套餐，根据保险级别的不同，保险费为 59 欧元或 79 欧元，保险期为两年。

输入设备和操作 - 超声波屏内指纹传感器

Poco F8 Ultra 的电容式触摸屏对输入的响应可靠而精确。使用预装的屏幕保护膜后，滑动特性良好，不过直接与玻璃本身互动的感觉明显更高级。

在生物识别安全方面，显示屏中集成了超声波指纹传感器，在测试过程中证明非常快速可靠。此外，也可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别，在光线充足的条件下可以快速解锁设备。

线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈，不过偶尔力度可以再大一些。

显示屏 - 更大，分辨率更低

子像素结构
子像素结构

与上一代产品相比，Poco F8 Ultra 的显示屏尺寸略有增大，但同时分辨率也有所降低。即便如此，416 PPI 的像素密度仍然保证了清晰的图像。同样令人失望的是，该面板再次没有采用 LTPO 技术，这意味着刷新率只能由系统在 60 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节。

亮度水平很高，在 APL18 和 HDR 测量中均达到约 3,500 cd/m²。手动调节亮度时，最高亮度可达 617 cd/m²，而激活阳光模式后，亮度可达 821 cd/m²。

与 F8 Pro一样，Poco 在规格中列出了用于亮度控制的直流调光。但在示波器下，这变成了基频较低的高频 PWM 调光。因此，显示屏比较容易看清，但并非完全无闪烁。

1767
cd/m²		1767
cd/m²		1774
cd/m²
1773
cd/m²		1771
cd/m²		1777
cd/m²
1777
cd/m²		1773
cd/m²		1774
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1777 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1772.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.09 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1771 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6452 K
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
AMOLED, 2608x1200, 6.9"		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"		Honor Magic7 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"		Google Pixel 10 Pro
OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"
Screen
-44%
11%
31%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
1771
1357
-23%
1607
-9%
2161
22%
Brightness (cd/m²)
1773
1350
-24%
1609
-9%
2198
24%
Brightness Distribution (%)
99
94
-5%
95
-4%
94
-5%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
3.1
-138%
0.9
31%
0.7
46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
4.7
-68%
1.8
36%
1.8
36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
2.2
-5%
1.7
19%
0.8
62%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2 110%
2.24 98%
2.19 100%
CCT
6452 101%
6391 102%
6346 102%
6646 98%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3519 cd/m²
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3199 cd/m² -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2613 cd/m² -26%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1634 cd/m² -54%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4697 cd/m² +36%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3458 cd/m²
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3207 cd/m² -7%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2768 cd/m² -20%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 14.02 %
Secondary Frequency: 2272 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8108 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
Min.
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

我们使用 Calman 评估了显示器的校准精度。当色温设置为暖色时，色彩再现非常准确，尽管看起来仍比目标温度稍低。

灰度（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（配色方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（配色方案：原色专业版，色温：暖，目标色彩空间：sRGB暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配色方案：原色 Pro，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配色方案：原色 Pro，色温：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4395 ms rise
↘ 0.433 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.433 ms rise
↘ 0.427 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

在室外，Poco F8 Ultra 即使在温暖的日子里也能给人留下良好的印象，并且始终易于阅读。最多，反光会让人有些分心。

面板的视角稳定性非常好。在非常浅的视角下，图像只会稍微变暗。

室外
室外
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - Poco F8 Ultra 配备骁龙 8 代精英处理器 5

Poco F8 Ultra 依靠尖端的 骁龙 8 第五代精英处理器提供一流的系统性能。

根据所选配置的不同，这款智能手机有 12 或 16 GB LPDDR5x 内存可供选择，UFS 4.1 内存也是速度最快的内存之一。

Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
3676 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 - 3831, n=7)
3662 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points -13%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3050 Points -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
2308 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3883, n=212, last 2 years)
1773 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 - 12383, n=7)
11132 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
11004 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points -9%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9019 Points -18%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
6314 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 11634, n=212, last 2 years)
5184 Points -53%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2750094 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2390211 - 3269237, n=6)
2662560 Points -3%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2474369 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2262067 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3269237, n=152, last 2 years)
1504892 Points -45%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
1338955 Points -51%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (18445 - 28557, n=6)
21158 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +13%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20630 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18445 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
15738 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 28557, n=186, last 2 years)
14871 Points -19%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2598 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points -9%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2259 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 - 2598, n=6)
2242 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=123, last 2 years)
1164 Points -55%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
14678 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (12929 - 16690, n=6)
14227 Points -3%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
13729 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points -9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
8446 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 16690, n=149, last 2 years)
7738 Points -47%
System
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
20996 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19891 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (18137 - 21153, n=6)
19657 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points -18%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
12881 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 21153, n=149, last 2 years)
11513 Points -45%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
18501 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (13505 - 24052, n=6)
17540 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points -6%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15541 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 24052, n=149, last 2 years)
8791 Points -52%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
7257 Points -61%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (51530 - 61797, n=6)
53992 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
51530 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
51041 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points -12%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
30035 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=149, last 2 years)
26091 Points -49%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
2319 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (2143 - 2468, n=6)
2274 Points -2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2252 Points -3%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
1813 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2468, n=149, last 2 years)
1707 Points -26%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23281 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (19236 - 23712, n=6)
22364 Points +16%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20782 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3769 - 81594, n=135, last 2 years)
19964 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19236 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
17652 Points -8%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5210, n=60, last 2 years)
790 Points +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (524 - 698, n=6)
604 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
559 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
478 Points -14%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 36297, n=60, last 2 years)
3411 Points +508%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
907 Points +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 - 676, n=6)
574 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
561 Points
Quantized NPU 1.5
Average of class Smartphone
  (133 - 49889, n=60, last 2 years)
4934 Points +284%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
3792 Points +195%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
1285 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 - 1498, n=6)
1211 Points -6%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=41, last 2 years)
771 Points
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
590 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
248 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
240 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384
19229 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1098 - 22149, n=5)
13605 Points -29%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10742 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 - 22149, n=76, last 2 years)
5062 Points -74%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5, DXT-48-1536, 16384
797 Points -96%

集成的 Adreno 840作为图形解决方案。目前，智能手机还没有比它更快的 GPU。此外，Poco 还为 F8 Ultra 配备了专用的 VisionBoost D8 芯片组，旨在进一步优化游戏性能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6959 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5933 Points -15%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3232 Points -54%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
7021 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points -3%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5800 Points -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3281 Points -53%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
30621 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points -13%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23837 Points -22%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13193 Points -57%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
13036 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10066 Points -23%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
12242 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10634 Points -13%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2704 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points -11%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2248 Points -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1013 Points -63%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2736 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points -3%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2272 Points -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1014 Points -63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps +23%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
631 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
579 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
406 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +38%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
368 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
341 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
282 fps -17%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
343 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps -13%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -51%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
198 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -19%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
114 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps -6%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps -21%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps -22%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
296 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps -20%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps -57%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -12%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25 fps -50%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
315.056 Points +90%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
284.674 Points +72%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
193.311 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
165.891 Points
Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=149, last 2 years)
156.3 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 165.9, n=5)
125.8 Points -24%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
29.3 runs/min +17%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
26.1 runs/min +4%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
25.1 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (16.5 - 25.1, n=5)
20.9 runs/min -17%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
20.6 runs/min -18%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=124, last 2 years)
14.7 runs/min -41%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points +90%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
196 Points +58%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
177 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=6)
163.8 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=145, last 2 years)
146.7 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
124 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points +70%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
89248 Points +53%
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
84055 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 - 99417, n=6)
77185 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
58421 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=197, last 2 years)
49143 Points -16%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=154, last 2 years)
1148 ms * -120%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)
522.8 ms *
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Chrome 140)
472.5 ms * +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (306 - 635, n=6)
456 ms * +13%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
429.4 ms * +18%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraHonor Magic7 ProGoogle Pixel 10 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
-25%
-55%
-21%
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
4064.33
3823.28
-6%
3910.81
-4%
1492.74
-63%
3734 ?(1954 - 4110, n=24)
-8%
2228 ?(270 - 4370, n=196, last 2 years)
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3987.65
3361.24
-16%
3683.81
-8%
1353.55
-66%
3209 ?(1240 - 4035, n=24)
-20%
1852 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=196, last 2 years)
-54%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
575.86
287.85
-50%
282.34
-51%
264.44
-54%
380 ?(279 - 576, n=24)
-34%
296 ?(47.6 - 576, n=196, last 2 years)
-49%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
551.82
331.61
-40%
357.04
-35%
347.84
-37%
438 ?(48.2 - 678, n=24)
-21%
339 ?(9.4 - 987, n=196, last 2 years)
-39%

排放 - 压力下过热

温度

在持续负载的情况下，表面温度偶尔会接近 50 度大关，但仍在可接受的范围内。

不过，SoC 的散热性能就不那么令人信服了。在 3DMark 压力测试中，只有一项测试能够完成，其他测试都因过热问题而提前结束。即使是最简单的测试（Wild Life），也在 20 个循环中进行了 12 个循环后停止。不过，在日常使用中，我们还没有发现任何限制。

Max. Load
 48.5 °C49.5 °C49.3 °C 
 48.9 °C49.8 °C47.7 °C 
 46.1 °C47.7 °C44.3 °C 
Maximum: 49.8 °C
Average: 48 °C
47.3 °C48.2 °C47.5 °C
45.3 °C48.8 °C48.9 °C
44.2 °C48.5 °C45.6 °C
Maximum: 48.9 °C
Average: 47.1 °C
Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.2 %
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 10 Pro
DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.3 %
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.4 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 %
Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
81.4 %
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 % -12%
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.3.6: Ø7.91 (7.65-9.39)
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.3.6: Ø3.63 (3.05-4.24)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø91 (76-138.4)
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø96 (74.7-129.7)
Google Pixel 10 Pro DXT-48-1536, Tensor G5, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø64.8 (61.7-76)
压力测试结果

发言人

由 Bose 调校的扬声器（包括一个后置低音炮）是一个真正的亮点。Poco F8 Ultra 的音质表现与我们迄今测试过的任何智能手机都截然不同。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.839.12529.624.23119.319.44025.326.75033.336.66320.735.38023.843.710018.448.812515.255.516011.964.92001564.225011.763.231511.765.940010.164.45009.867.363010.869.980011.374.7100011.377.8125012.378.4160011.774.2200011.377.225001279.6315012.281.3400012.879.8500013.177.8630013.377800013.374.71000013.475.21250013.372.41600012.962.3SPL24.489.6N0.582.7median 12.2median 74.7Delta1.36.438.443.230.640.119.240.421.539.636.944.224.447.719.746.315.84714.150.615.260.112.459.29.560.99.763.410.566.4970.29.873.98.976.69.479.711.579.211.278.31283.911.783.41282.31282.912.58312.981.113.38013.578.613.569.513.665.623.9930.598.2median 12median 78.31.58.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco F8 UltraSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - Poco F8 Ultra 电池容量为 6,500 毫安时

耗电量

Poco F8 Ultra 的功耗保持在相对高效的水平。

通过线缆充电最高支持 100 瓦，无线充电最高支持 50 瓦。在测试中，一个完整的充电周期仅需 35 分钟（15 分钟充 50%，27 分钟充 80%）。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.29 / 1.33 Watt
Load midlight 8.84 / 9.15 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh		Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		Google Pixel 10 Pro
4870 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-6%
-19%
-39%
-3%
-7%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
0.87
0.55
37%
0.94
-8%
1.01
-16%
0.833 ?(0.6 - 1.2, n=6)
4%
0.842 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=162, last 2 years)
3%
Idle Average * (Watt)
1.29
0.77
40%
1.5
-16%
1.65
-28%
1.403 ?(0.8 - 2.13, n=6)
-9%
1.439 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=162, last 2 years)
-12%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
1.33
0.91
32%
1.57
-18%
2.05
-54%
1.702 ?(1.33 - 2.18, n=6)
-28%
1.624 ?(0.77 - 4.46, n=162, last 2 years)
-22%
Load Average * (Watt)
8.84
13.81
-56%
11.03
-25%
7.25
18%
6.43 ?(4.2 - 8.84, n=5)
27%
7.03 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=139, last 2 years)
20%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
9.15
16.69
-82%
11.68
-28%
19.78
-116%
10.2 ?(8.9 - 12.3, n=5)
-11%
11.3 ?(3.53 - 22, n=139, last 2 years)
-23%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.37 (0.963-9.17)
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.46 (3.53-12.8)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.977 (0.778-1.37)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.08 (9.02-9.14)
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.1-11.7)
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)
Xiaomi 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.977 (0.778-1.37)

电池寿命

尽管电池容量很大，但 Poco F8 Ultra 的续航时间并不是最好的，但总体来说还是非常不错的。在 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间略低于 22 小时，足以支撑两天的使用。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 142)
21h 53min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6500 mAh
21.9 h
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
22.2 h
Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh
24.7 h
Google Pixel 10 Pro
4870 mAh
21.1 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

已测试小米 Poco F8 Ultra
已测试小米 Poco F8 Ultra

Poco F8 Ultra 采用了高品质的 IP68 认证机身（牛仔布风格或玻璃纤维饰面）、骁龙 8 精英 5 代处理器、USB 3.2、强大的摄像头、明亮的 120-Hz 显示屏、带低音炮的 Bose 扬声器和 6500 毫安时电池。不过，在持续负载情况下，该设备会出现明显的发热现象，而且不支持 6 GHz Wi-Fi。

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra - 12/18/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
68 / 69 → 99%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
92%
Games Performance
48 / 55 → 87%
Application Performance
81 / 85 → 96%
AI Performance
38%
Temperature
55%
Noise
100%
Audio
90 / 90 → 100%
Camera
80%
Average
67%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
95.9%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
89%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.8%

可能的替代品一览

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.2%
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 U...
2. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 U...
3. $9.90
Anbzsign 2+1 Pack for Xiaomi...
List Price: 900€		220 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.90"
2608x1200
416 PPI
AMOLED
2.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $1,105.26
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25...
2. $1,015.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-...
3. $1,117.50
Samsung Galaxy ​S25 Ultra ...
List Price: 1449€		218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3.
89.2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 		Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind for Honor Magic7 Pro...
2. $9.99
Anbzsign (2+2 Pack) for Hono...
3. $10.79
AKABEILA [2 Pack Privacy Scr...
List Price: 1300€		223 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
2800x1280
453 PPI
OLED
4.
88.9%
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google Tensor G5 ⎘
IMG DXT-48-1536 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $849.00
List Price: 1199€		207 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.30"
2856x1280
497 PPI
OLED

More articles related to this device

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Poco F8 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 配备 Bose 低音炮的平价旗舰--小米 Poco F8 Ultra 评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-12-22 (Update: 2025-12-22)