Android 智能手机中的突破性摄像头 - vivo X200 Ultra 评测

Name: Vivo X200 Ultra
Brand: Vivo

供摄影专业人士使用。

凭借 X200 Ultra，vivo 正在打造 2025 年的顶级拍照手机之一。有了可选配件，它更像一部相机，而不是智能手机。请阅读我们的评测，了解这款配备骁龙 8 精英处理器的 vivo 手机是否有任何弱点。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 07/03/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Touchscreen Smartphone

判决

如果您正在寻找目前Android 市场上最好的智能手机之一，那么 vivo X200 Ultra 绝对是您的不二之选。vivo X200 Ultra 不仅是一款高品质、引人注目的旗舰手机，而且还完善了其高端系列的蔡司相机系统。

与 X200 Pro 一样，该制造商专注于拍照，但在质量方面更进一步。尤其是超广角照片的粉丝们一定会非常高兴，因为 X200 Ultra 与 iPhone 16 Pro 等竞争产品相比可谓独树一帜。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

X200 Ultra 的不足之处主要来自于在中国以外地区的有限供应，例如更新时间表信息缺失或 eSIM 使用问题。此外，这款 vivo 旗舰机型还因为散热量大和节流问题不太适合游戏玩家。对于这些用户，我们建议他们选择 ROG Phone 9 Pro.

Pros

+ 高性能

+ 功能强大的相机

+ 出色的相机配件

+ 明亮的 1,440p OLED 显示屏

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 仅限进口

- 高度节流

- 更新缺乏透明度

- 功能空白（eSIM、UWB 芯片）

价格和供应情况

X200 Ultra 配备 12GB LPDDR5X 内存和 256GB UFS 4.1 内存，起价 6499 元，约合 900 美元。我们的租赁商提供的起价约为 1,023 美元。目前全球上市的可能性不大，也没有迹象表明会有其他选择。

$11.22

YQINHHME for Vivo X200 Ultra Tempered Glass Screen Protector, [5 Pack] 9H Hardness Protective Film for Vivo X200 Ultra (6.82"), High Clear, Anti Scratch, Bubble Free Tempered Glass Film

AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Screen Protector for vivo X200 Ultra 5G Privacy Glass Full Coverage Anti Spy Tempered Glass Protective Film
$8.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible with Vivo X200 Ultra 5G Screen Protector Tempered Glass，Case Friendly [9H Hardness] [High definition Anti Scratch]

判决
vivo X200 Ultra 的规格
手机壳 - vivo X200 Ultra 具有防水功能
功能 - 配备 USB 3 的 vivo 手机
软件 - vivo X200 Ultra，含Android 15
通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 的智能手机
手机功能和语音质量 - vivo X200 Ultra 采用双卡双待功能
摄像头 -Android 手机，配备蔡司光学镜头
配件和保修 - vivo X200 Ultra（带电源适配器
输入和操作 - 配备超声波技术的智能手机
显示屏 - vivo X200 Ultra 采用 OLED 显示屏
性能 -Android 配备 Snapdragon 8 Elite 的智能手机
排放 - 热Android 电话
电池续航时间 - vivo X200 Ultra 可无线充电
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可能的替代品比较

vivo 的目标是通过 X200 Ultra 为智能手机的照片和视频质量设立一个新标准。从纸面上看，这款旗舰手机是第一款在主摄像头质量方面几乎没有任何妥协的手机。

与专业版相比，X200 Ultra 采用了骁龙 8 精英SoC 外加两个 AI-ISP 处理器来提高照片质量。

vivo X200 Ultra 的规格

Vivo X200 Ultra (X200 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 830

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5X

Display

6.82 inch 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 510 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, LTPO, 2160Hz PWM, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB

, 931 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G: 850/900/1800/1900MHz; 3G: B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B6/B19; 4G TD-LTE: B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48; 4G FDD-LTE: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66; 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n18/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78/n79/n80/n81/n83/n84/n89, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 163.2 x 76.7

Battery

6000 mAh Silicon-Carbon

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.7, 35 mm, 1/1.28", OIS) + 200 MPix (f/2.3, 85 mm, telephoto, 1/1.4", OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, 14 mm, 1/1.28", OIS)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.5, 24 mm, 1/2.76")

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, charger, case, USB cable, OriginOS 5, 12 Months Warranty, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof

Weight

229 g

Price

890 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

手机壳 - vivo X200 Ultra 具有防水功能

X200 Ultra 的外壳采用优质材料，做工精良，令人印象深刻。其设计特点是显示屏与表面的比例高达 90.2%。这意味着屏幕占据了正面的大部分面积，使外观更具现代感。

这款 vivo 旗舰手机通过了 IP69/IP68 认证，可确保防尘防水。除了颜色，每个版本的背板表面处理也有所不同。红色机型表面光滑，白色机型表面为水平网格状，黑色机型表面为三角形图案。根据 vivo 的说法，该机的一大亮点是采用了抗老化涂层，旨在保护材料免受刮伤。

与 OPPO Find X8 Ultra一样，X200 Ultra 也有一个专用的相机按钮，可以访问各种相机功能，包括对焦和变焦。

尺寸比较

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Vivo X200 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Vivo X200 Pro Xiaomi 15S Pro DIN A6 ❌

功能 - 配备 USB 3 的 vivo 手机

这款 vivo 旗舰手机配备了 USB OTG、红外爆破器、蓝牙 5.4 和用于非接触式支付的 NFC 芯片。它还提供一个快速 USB 3.2 端口，支持图像输出和 Miracast。超宽带芯片小米 15S Pro的超宽带芯片。

软件 - vivo X200 Ultra，含Android 15

X200 Ultra 使用该公司自己的 OriginOS 5 版本，该版本基于Android 15，支持包括德语和英语在内的多种语言。vivo 没有透露打算为其旗舰机提供多长时间的更新支持。谷歌服务可通过内部的 V-Appstore 提供，随后安装的 Play Store 也可以顺利使用。

可持续性

vivo 没有将智能手机的可持续发展放在首位。关于所用材料的选择或回收利用的信息没有公开发布。可维修性也几乎无法理解。不过，包装似乎是无塑料的。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 的智能手机

X200 Ultra 最多支持接入 5G 移动网络。在我们的测试中，由于 LTE 频段 20 和 28（也属于 4G 网络）的覆盖范围，vivo 手机没有出现任何连接问题。

在家庭 Wi-Fi 网络中，这款旗舰手机提供快速 Wi-Fi 7，但不支持 6 GHz 频道。在我们的测试中，X200 Ultra 与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器配合使用，仍然实现了超过 1,500 MBit/s 的高传输速率。

Networking
Vivo X200 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	644 (min: 520) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1561 (min: 1441) MBit/s ∼91%
Xiaomi 15S Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	508 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼29%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1524 (min: 1222) MBit/s ∼100%
Vivo X200 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 462) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	966 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼56%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	595 (min: 484) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1721 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼97%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	966 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1167 (min: 810) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1283 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1441 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	726 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	733 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1382 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1393 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼91%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1720 (798-1853)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1483 (1289-1530)

Vivo X200 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø644 (520-871)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1806 (1767-1846)

Vivo X200 Ultra 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1561 (1441-1609)

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (744-1523)

在一次骑车旅行中，我们将这款手机的跟踪性能与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。X200 Ultra 使用双频全球卫星网络确定位置。详细路线可能会出现轻微误差，而 vivo 手机倾向于简化曲线。

手机功能和语音质量 - vivo X200 Ultra 采用双卡双待功能

X200 Ultra 最多可容纳两张 nanoSIM 卡。虽然有 eSIM 卡，但仅适用于中国。不过，它支持 VoLTE 和通过家庭 Wi-Fi 通话。

语音质量不错。语音再现清晰，并能过滤掉安静的环境噪音。

摄像头 -Android 手机，配备蔡司光学镜头

选择 X200 Ultra 的主摄像头是一项挑战，因为所有传感器的尺寸都很均衡。这款 vivo 旗舰机型为业余摄影爱好者提供了一个 35 毫米镜头和一个 14 毫米超广角镜头，这两个镜头都配备了 1/1.28 英寸 LYT-818 传感器，包括 OIS 以及 X200 Pro200 万像素长焦相机。该机型还支持光学防抖和 4K@120 视频。

不出所料，X200 Ultra 的照片质量和 HDR 计算都非常出色。尤其是超广角镜头，在低光照条件下的表现优于竞争对手的旗舰产品。不过，200 万像素的长焦镜头也以 3.7 倍的无损放大率给人留下了深刻印象--即使是全分辨率的照片，在室内光线下也能使用。

我们看到，带有蔡司品牌的 X200 Ultra 相机系统在弱光环境下略显不足。在这里，比 LYT-900 更小的索尼 LYT-818 无法与 X200 Ultra 的主摄像头相媲美。 Find X8 Ultra或小米 15 Ultra.色彩准确度也有待提高。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low Light Ultra wide-angle camera

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - vivo X200 Ultra（带电源适配器

交货范围包括一条 USB 线、一个保护盖和一个 90 瓦的电源适配器。深圳贸易公司还为该国使用的插座提供了一个欧盟适配器，但这不是标配。vivo 还为其旗舰产品提供了摄影套件和蔡司变焦镜头作为可选附件（约 420 美元）。

保修保修期为 12 个月。我们的测试设备来自深圳贸易公司，如果需要保修，也可以将 vivo 手机寄往欧洲的收货地址。

输入和操作 - 配备超声波技术的智能手机

X200 Ultra 使用 3D 超声波指纹传感器，效果非常好。如果想使用面部数据解锁，可以通过前置摄像头，但这种 2D 方法安全性较低。

通过触摸屏输入的速度很快，轮询率为 300 Hz。vivo 还安装了高质量的振动马达，不过还没有达到顶级水平。

显示屏 - vivo X200 Ultra 采用 OLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，每个子像素由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

6.82 英寸 LTPO 显示屏的分辨率为 3,168 x 1,440 像素，像素密度高达 510 PPI。刷新率可在 1 Hz 和 120 Hz 之间动态调节。

根据数据表，X200 Ultra 使用频率为 2,380 Hz 的 PWM 调光来控制亮度。在实际的 APL18 测试中，我们没有达到所宣传的峰值亮度 4,500 cd/m²，但 2,189 cd/m² 仍是一个非常不错的结果。在再现 HDR 内容时，有机发光二极管通常仍有改进空间。


1236 cd/m²	1245 cd/m²	1286 cd/m²
1222 cd/m²	1286 cd/m²	1245 cd/m²
1203 cd/m²	1216 cd/m²	1199 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1286 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1237.6 cd/m² Minimum: 0.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1286 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249

	Vivo X200 Ultra AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Xiaomi 15S Pro 3200x1440, 6.7"	Vivo X200 Pro OLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"	Oppo Find X8 Ultra AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Screen		-64%	31%	11%	-55%
Brightness middle	1286	983 -24%	1828 42%	1366 6%	1357 6%
Brightness	1238	949 -23%	1828 48%	1325 7%	1350 9%
Brightness Distribution	93	91 -2%	94 1%	95 2%	94 1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.04	2.07 -99%	0.7 33%	0.88 15%	3.1 -198%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.26	5.24 -132%	1.6 29%	1.55 31%	4.7 -108%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	3.3 -106%	1.1 31%	1.5 6%	2.2 -38%
Gamma	2.249 ^98%	2.233 ^99%	2.25 ^98%	2.303 ^96%	2 ^110%
CCT	6575 ^99%	7224 ^90%	6520 ^100%	6626 ^98%	6391 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

121 Hz
Amplitude: 70 %

The display backlight flickers at 121 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 121 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8354 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

我们使用照片光谱仪和卡尔曼分析软件检查色彩表现。在专业色彩模式下可以获得最佳效果。偏差在目标范围内（<3），通常非常小。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.4 ms rise
2.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.1 ms rise
2.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

vivo 旗舰机型具备户外使用的最佳先决条件和足够的亮度储备，即使在晴天也能保持非常易于阅读。可视角度的稳定性也很吸引人。

性能 -Android 配备 Snapdragon 8 Elite 的智能手机

与 X200 Pro与 X200 Pro 不同，X200 Ultra 没有配备 Dimensity 9400 而是高通公司的高端 SoC。高通骁龙 8 精英版在 CPU 基准测试中取得了非常好的成绩，但 X200 Ultra 即使在性能模式下也与预期有一定差距。而 Adreno 830在 GFXBench 中的表现略好于 Find X8 Ultra。 Find X8 Ultra或 Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	3200 Points +8%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	3145 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2309 - 3228, n=20)	3022 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	2985 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2976 Points
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	2748 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3479, n=207, last 2 years)	1608 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	10020 Points +8%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9722 Points +5%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9284 Points
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	9250 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7784 - 10401, n=20)	9198 Points -1%
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	8574 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=207, last 2 years)	4625 Points -50%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2845517 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2760009 Points -3%
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	2705165 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2340778 - 3015111, n=15)	2698774 Points -5%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	2487133 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2262067 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=146, last 2 years)	1340846 Points -53%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (14862 - 27169, n=18)	20859 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	20764 Points +30%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	18897 Points +19%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	15938 Points
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	15849 Points -1%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	15446 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=194, last 2 years)	14275 Points -10%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2354 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	2276 Points +5%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2162 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1064 - 2674, n=14)	1937 Points -10%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1689 Points -22%
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	1663 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=151, last 2 years)	1033 Points -52%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	13325 Points +63%
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	12594 Points +54%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	11988 Points +47%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	11073 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8155 - 14066, n=15)	11067 Points +36%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	8155 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14066, n=156, last 2 years)	7017 Points -14%
System
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17171 Points +57%
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	16162 Points +48%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	15799 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (10849 - 20776, n=15)	15472 Points +41%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	15326 Points +40%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	10953 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=156, last 2 years)	10827 Points -1%
Memory
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	20652 Points +192%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	17355 Points +145%
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	13673 Points +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7081 - 20572, n=15)	13158 Points +86%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	11234 Points +59%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=156, last 2 years)	7871 Points +11%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	7081 Points
Graphics
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	384996 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (35063 - 384996, n=15)	64212 Points -83%
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	51898 Points -87%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	45562 Points -88%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	42332 Points -89%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	28402 Points -93%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=156, last 2 years)	22601 Points -94%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2322 Points +57%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	2232 Points +51%
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	2183 Points +48%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2095 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1202 - 2363, n=15)	1879 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=156, last 2 years)	1631 Points +10%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1477 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	81594 Points +279%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	23281 Points +8%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	21543 Points
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	21087 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=147, last 2 years)	18514 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=13)	17467 Points -19%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	12176 Points -43%

AImark - Score v3.x
Vivo X200 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 15360	52884 Points +2489%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=131, last 2 years)	27633 Points +1253%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (787 - 307528, n=13)	25221 Points +1135%
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2043 Points
Xiaomi 15S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384	1982 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1923 Points -6%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	995 Points -51%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6907 Points +2%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6743 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6691 Points -1%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6417 Points -5%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6294 Points -7%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6845 Points +2%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6722 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6684 Points -1%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6432 Points -4%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6311 Points -6%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26614 Points +6%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25847 Points +3%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	25127 Points
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	22987 Points -9%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	22298 Points -11%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12395 Points +1%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	12239 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11973 Points -2%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11476 Points -6%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9604 Points -22%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12711 Points +4%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	12227 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11983 Points -2%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11504 Points -6%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9594 Points -22%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2571 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2538 Points -1%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2509 Points -2%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2458 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2397 Points -7%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2651 Points +2%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2589 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2584 Points 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2495 Points -4%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2443 Points -6%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	818 fps +4%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	791 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	788 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	776 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	713 fps -10%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	498 fps +2%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	487 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	472 fps -3%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	411 fps -16%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	371 fps -24%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	354 fps +3%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	344 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	324 fps -6%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	299 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	284 fps -17%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	104 fps -13%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	216 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	212 fps -2%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	188 fps -13%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	182 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	161 fps -25%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +30%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	100 fps +9%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	95 fps +3%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	92 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -35%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	129 fps +9%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	118 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	118 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	107 fps -9%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	104 fps -12%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	332 fps
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	321 fps -3%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	299 fps -10%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	255 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	237 fps -29%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps +2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	53 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps 0%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50 fps -4%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Vivo X200 Ultra	288.437 Points
Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chrome 137)	265 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (113.6 - 304, n=4)	228 Points -21%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	205.435 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (56.4 - 401, n=22, last 2 years)	188 Points -35%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	29.3 runs/min +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=12)	24.1 runs/min +7%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)	22.6 runs/min
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)	17.7 runs/min -22%
Xiaomi 15S Pro	14.5 runs/min -36%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=103, last 2 years)	12.8 runs/min -43%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	236 Points +57%
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)	225 Points +50%
Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chrome 137)	196 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=13)	179.5 Points +20%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)	150 Points
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	135 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=154, last 2 years)	131.4 Points -12%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	99202 Points +8%
Vivo X200 Ultra (Chrome 137)	91563 Points
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)	86943 Points -5%
Xiaomi 15S Pro	81076 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=17)	74566 Points -19%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	59387 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)	44421 Points -51%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1325 ms * -217%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)	612.34 ms * -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 873, n=14)	523 ms * -25%
Xiaomi 15S Pro (Chromne 137)	502.34 ms * -20%
Vivo X200 Pro (Chrome 131)	431.56 ms * -3%
Vivo X200 Ultra	417.65 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)	376.8 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

	Vivo X200 Ultra	Xiaomi 15S Pro	Vivo X200 Pro	Oppo Find X8 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra	Average 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		19%	-9%	-1%	-10%	3%	-36%
Sequential Read 256KB	3358.64	3786.34 13%	2694.85 -20%	3754.43 12%	3823.28 14%	3428 ?(998 - 4027, n=13) 2%	2134 ?(270 - 4384, n=189, last 2 years) -36%
Sequential Write 256KB	2998.87	3649.81 22%	2174.26 -27%	3564.22 19%	3361.24 12%	3211 ?(936 - 3908, n=13) 7%	1732 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=189, last 2 years) -42%
Random Read 4KB	462.41	422.84 -9%	317.29 -31%	375.9 -19%	287.85 -38%	395 ?(269 - 462, n=13) -15%	292 ?(47.6 - 504, n=189, last 2 years) -37%
Random Write 4KB	459.33	677.95 48%	658.43 43%	389.28 -15%	331.61 -28%	543 ?(342 - 753, n=13) 18%	336 ?(9.4 - 964, n=189, last 2 years) -27%

排放 - 热Android 电话

温度

在凉爽的机箱中，Pro 和 Ultra 型号在 3DMark 中的差异并不明显，但 X200 Ultra 的热量开发确保了在压力测试中略低的节流率，"仅 "高达 40%。

Max. Load

Idle


49.3 °C	49.8 °C	48.1 °C
49.6 °C	49.3 °C	48.1 °C
49.4 °C	49.6 °C	47.1 °C

Maximum: 49.8 °C
Average: 48.9 °C


45.4 °C	46.7 °C	42.9 °C
45.1 °C	45.2 °C	42.8 °C
44.6 °C	47.4 °C	42.2 °C

Maximum: 47.4 °C
Average: 44.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	89.8 % +50%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	81.4 % +36%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.9 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.9 % -8%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	40.8 % -32%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	88.9 % +54%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	86.4 % +49%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.8 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52.3 % -10%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49.8 % -14%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	94 % +26%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	87.4 % +17%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	74.8 %
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49.7 % -34%
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	49 % -34%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	93.6 % +31%
Xiaomi 15S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	84.3 % +18%
Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.7 %
Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56.5 % -21%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50.6 % -29%

Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø33 (23.2-40.1)

Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.8 (19-38.1)

Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø118.9 (85.9-143.5)

Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64 (49.8-122.2)

Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø102.7 (69.9-138.2)

Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø37.8 (30.7-41)

Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø23.5 (19-38.8)

Vivo X200 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø18.5 (13.8-19.2)

Vivo X200 Pro Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.1 (10.3-18.2)

发言人

vivo 旗舰机型的两个扬声器音质良好，略带低音。耳机可通过 USB 端口或蓝牙 5.4 无线连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Vivo X200 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - vivo X200 Ultra 可无线充电

耗电量

6,000 毫安时的大容量电池最大充电功率为 90 瓦；峰值时可无线充电 40 瓦。在我们的测试中，X200 Ultra 需要 50 分钟才能充满电。

在耗电量测量中，X200 Ultra 骁龙 8 精英版其实并不省钱，整体功耗相当高。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.6 / 2.9 / 3.7 Watt
Load	10.6 / 19.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Vivo X200 Ultra 6000 mAh	Xiaomi 15S Pro 6100 mAh	Vivo X200 Pro 6000 mAh	Oppo Find X8 Ultra 6100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		50%	43%	46%	40%	41%	46%
Idle Minimum *	1.6	0.8 50%	0.43 73%	0.8 50%	0.55 66%	0.876 ?(0.49 - 1.6, n=17) 45%	0.871 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=161, last 2 years) 46%
Idle Average *	2.9	1.4 52%	1.76 39%	1.1 62%	0.77 73%	1.446 ?(0.87 - 2.9, n=17) 50%	1.424 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) 51%
Idle Maximum *	3.7	1.7 54%	1.83 51%	1.6 57%	0.91 75%	1.655 ?(0.94 - 3.7, n=17) 55%	1.586 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) 57%
Load Average *	10.6	6.3 41%	9.58 10%	8.5 20%	13.81 -30%	8.76 ?(5.8 - 13, n=14) 17%	7.13 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) 33%
Load Maximum *	19.5	9.1 53%	11.43 41%	11.8 39%	16.69 14%	12.5 ?(8.86 - 19.5, n=14) 36%	10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) 45%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.63 (0.2637-10.6)

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.15 (0.749-11.8)

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.43 (2.01-4.19)

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.775 (0.651-1.625)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø19.3 (18.5-19.7)

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.7 (8.48-11.8)

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.43 (2.01-4.19)

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.775 (0.651-1.625)

电池寿命

在现实条件下，显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m²，X200 Ultra 在 WLAN 测试中的运行时间非常出色。与专业版X200 Ultra 的电池续航时间与 Pro 相似，约为 23.5 小时。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137)

23h 18min

	Vivo X200 Ultra 6000 mAh	Xiaomi 15S Pro 6100 mAh	Vivo X200 Pro 6000 mAh	Oppo Find X8 Ultra 6100 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	1398	1526 9%	1404 0%	1374 -2%	1331 -5%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

如果您正在寻找 2025 年最佳智能手机之一，那么 vivo X200 Ultra 一定是您的关注焦点。

Back to the verdict

Vivo X200 Ultra - 06/29/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

92%

Keyboard

71 / 75 → 94%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

65 / 69 → 94%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

93%

Games Performance

43 / 55 → 77%

Application Performance

79 / 85 → 93%

AI Performance

41%

Temperature

80%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

88%

Average

70%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
94.7%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
53.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 53.8%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Android 智能手机中的突破性摄像头 - vivo X200 Ultra 评测

供摄影专业人士使用。

判决

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

vivo X200 Ultra 的规格

手机壳 - vivo X200 Ultra 具有防水功能

尺寸比较

功能 - 配备 USB 3 的 vivo 手机

软件 - vivo X200 Ultra，含Android 15

可持续性

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 的智能手机

手机功能和语音质量 - vivo X200 Ultra 采用双卡双待功能

摄像头 -Android 手机，配备蔡司光学镜头

配件和保修 - vivo X200 Ultra（带电源适配器

输入和操作 - 配备超声波技术的智能手机

显示屏 - vivo X200 Ultra 采用 OLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 -Android 配备 Snapdragon 8 Elite 的智能手机

排放 - 热Android 电话

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

发言人

Vivo X200 Ultra audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

电池续航时间 - vivo X200 Ultra 可无线充电

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可能的替代品比较

More articles related to this device

Transparency