Notebookcheck Logo
Oppo Find X8 Ultra smartphone review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

摄像头怪兽让Apple iPhone 降级--Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测

电池容量大，重量轻。

Find X8 Ultra 是一款出色的旗舰手机，配备了骁龙 8 精英版和最佳的摄像头硬件。奥普在其高端手机中安装了多达五个传感器，以确保拍摄出完美的照片。即便如此，Galaxy S25 Ultra 和 iPhone 16 Pro 还有更多理由应该惧怕这款设备。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Smartphone Touchscreen Wi-Fi 7

关于 Oppo Find X8 Ultra 的评价

Find X8 Ultra 是 2025 年最出色的智能手机之一，尤其是它的摄像头具有出色的综合性能。看看 iPhone 16 Pro 上拍摄的对比照片，就知道这款 OPPO 旗舰手机的表现有多出色--无论原生焦距如何。不过，除了哈苏相机，Find X8 Pro 的 "大哥大 "还有很多亮点，例如令人印象深刻的运行时间和相对较低的节流性能。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

OPPO 在其 2025 旗舰机型上没有出现任何真正的失误；如果有的话，我们认为在可持续发展和更新方面还有一些改进的余地。由于 Find X8 Ultra 的全球型号缺失，它在欧洲（本次测试在欧洲进行）的供货情况也可以被视为一个负面因素。

Pros

+ 运行时间长
+ 快速 SoC
+ 非常出色的 OLED 面板
+ 高品质外壳
+ 强大的摄像头

Cons

- 无 UWB
- 欧洲市场缺货
- 更新不明确
- 没有 eSIM（中国以外地区）
- 有关可持续发展的信息很少
- PWM 闪烁

价格和供应情况

到目前为止，Find X8 Ultra 只在中国市场亮相。在中国，售价从 6499 元人民币（约合 900 美元）起。

您可以从深圳贸易公司以约 1000 美元的价格进口这款手机。Ultra 机型不太可能在全球发布。

在发布 Find X8 Pro之后，Oppo 又推出了其旗舰手机的 Ultra 机型，据称该机型几乎在所有方面都更胜一筹。与 Pro 版本不同，Ultra 配备了 联发科 SoC不同，该机型采用了高通公司的芯片组，即 骁龙 8 精英版.

它的最大亮点是背面巨大的摄像头模块，其中部分传感器甚至比 Find X8 Pro的摄像头阵容。在此背景下，Oppo 推出了名为 Lumo 的全新图像编辑系统。

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 的规格

Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Find X8 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 830
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.82 inch 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 510 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, 240 Hz touch rate, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 457 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Proximity Sensor, colour sensor, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G: 850/900/1800 MHz, 3G: 1/4/5/8, 4G: FDD: 1/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28A/66, TDD 34/38/39/40/41/42/48, 5G: n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28A/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78/n79/n80/n81/n83/n84, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 163.1 x 76.8
Battery
6100 mAh Silicon-Carbon
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm, 1.0", OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.1, 70 mm, 1/1.56", 3x optical zoom, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/3.1, 135 mm, 1/1.95", 6x optical zoom, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, 15 mm, 120˚, ultrawide, 1/2.75")
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.4, 21 mm, 1/2.74")
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, case, screen protector, Color OS, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, fanless, waterproof
Weight
226 g, Power Supply: 116 g
Price
1050 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

手机壳 - 高端防水手机

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 的配色
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 的配色

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 采用了引人注目的玻璃外壳：它的厚度仅为 8.78 毫米，重量仅为 226 克，尽管电池容量为 6,100 毫安时，但其外形却相当别致。不过，这款旗舰手机的 6.82 英寸屏幕绝对不小。据 OPPO 称，OLED 显示屏周围的纤薄边框宽度仅为 1.4 毫米，确保了超过 90% 的高屏占比，带来了现代感十足的外观。

Find X8 Ultra 的触感非常出色，由铝合金制成的磨砂边框不仅赋予了这款旗舰智能手机稳定性，还带来了不错的高级感。值得一提的是其机壳左侧的按键，用户可以自由分配，右侧的电容按键可以打开相机应用。

Oppo 智能手机的制造质量非常好，耐用性也同样出色。Find X8 Ultra 获得了瑞士 SGS 公司颁发的五星级防摔认证，并通过了 IP68 和 IP69 认证，可以防水防尘。Oppo 没有使用大猩猩玻璃，而是使用了一种未指定的 "水晶盾 "玻璃。

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

尺寸比较

❌
163.1 mm 76.8 mm 8.8 mm 226 g162.7 mm 77.1 mm 8.8 mm 223 g162.8 mm 77.6 mm 8.2 mm 218 g161.3 mm 75.3 mm 9.35 mm 229 g162.3 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 215 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 的Android 手机

除了蓝牙 5.4、NFC、红外爆破器和 Miracast 外，Find X8 Ultra 还配备了快速 USB-3.2 连接（Gen 1），支持有线图像输出。此外还配备了 USB OTG，让用户可以将外围设备连接到这款 OPPO 手机。另一方面，它没有 UWB 芯片。

软件 - 配备Android 15 的高端智能手机

Find X8 Ultra 将在四年内接受Android 操作系统升级，五年内接受安全更新。这不算差，但也不算好。其他旗舰手机，如 Galaxy S25 Ultra或 像素 9 Pro等旗舰手机将在七年内收到新的Android 版本。Find X8 Ultra 的安全补丁也只会每季度推出一次；在我们测试期间，这些补丁的日期是 2025 年 4 月 1 日。

Oppo 的智能手机搭载了Android 15，包括该公司自己的 ColorOS 15。尽管 Find X8 Ultra 不会正式登陆欧洲，但它仍然支持多种系统语言。虽然没有预装 PlayStore，但以后可以轻松安装。

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测

可持续性

目前还没有关于这款 OPPO 旗舰机可持续发展方面的信息--在这方面，生产商仍有一些工作要做。

它的包装不使用塑料，并且是用大豆油油墨印刷的。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 技术的 Oppo Find X8 Ultra

Find X8 Ultra 的频率覆盖范围承诺在欧洲没有限制。不过，Oppo 手机仅支持 18 个 LTE 频段。通过天通卫星进行的卫星通信仅适用于中国市场。

在 Wi-Fi 连接方面，Find X8 Ultra 采用了当前的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，尤其是我们的中国版本也使用 6 GHz 频道建立连接。

不过，我们在使用华硕 AXE11000 参考路由器时只注意到平均传输速率约为 600 MBit/s。旗舰版的接收速度要快得多。

Networking
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
595 (min: 484) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1721 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
984 (min: 960) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
840 (min: 800) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1565 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1545) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼97%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
563 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1610 (min: 1480) MBit/s ∼99%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1025 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1253 (min: 812) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1276 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1340 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
720 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
717 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1418 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1386 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼86%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø563 (494-652)
Oppo Find X8 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1610 (1480-1722)
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø595 (484-684)
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1721 (1348-1780)
户外定位服务
户外定位服务
室内定位服务
室内定位服务

Find X8 Ultra 提供快速、精确的卫星定位服务。

在我们的实际测试中，Oppo 手机的结果相当准确，在某些情况下甚至比 Garmin 智能手表还要准确。

Garmin Venu 2
Garmin Venu 2
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Oppo Find X8 Ultra

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双 SIM 卡的 Oppo 手机

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测

Oppo 智能手机通过 5G 网络提供完整的双 SIM 卡功能，有两个 nano SIM 卡插槽。由于使用的是中国版的 Color OS，我们在国内无法选择集成 eSIM 卡。

即便如此，欧洲用户也可以使用 WiFi 通话和 VoLTE。在我们的测试过程中，该手机通过听筒的通话质量总体不错，但我们的通话对象有时听起来有点闷。三个麦克风清晰地记录了我们的声音。

相机 - 配备索尼传感器的旗舰智能手机

X8 Ultra 上的自拍照
X8 Ultra 上的自拍照

从纸面上看，Find X8 Ultra 的相机设置，包括哈苏品牌，似乎与 专业版.但是，除了 15 mm 镜头外，其他传感器都与 Find X8 不同，而且尺寸明显大于 Find X8 Pro。 X8 Pro或 iPhone 16 Pro.

前置镜头为 3200 万像素，可以每秒 60 帧的速度录制 4K 视频。Find X8 Ultra 的自拍照细节丰富，清晰度高。

0.6x
0.6x
1x
1x
2x
2x
3x
3x
6x
6x
10x
20x
120倍（最大值）
宏观

这款智能手机的 23 毫米主摄像头配备索尼 1 英寸超大传感器（LYT-900），照片质量非常好。由于采用了 XXL 传感器，即使使用普通拍照模式，背景通常也会模糊不清。X8 Find Ultra 的清晰度和高动态范围都很吸引人。

使用 iPhone 16 Pro 拍摄的照片的轮廓 iPhone 16 Pro拍摄的照片，比如第二张测试照片中的教堂塔楼或屋顶瓦片，直接对比就会发现其轮廓已经因明显的软对焦而变得模糊不清，而 Oppo 旗舰产品却能呈现出丰富的细节。与 Vivo X200 Pro 类似，Find X8 Ultra 在镜头眩光和逆光拍摄方面也存在一些问题。

这款 OPPO 手机在弱光环境下的表现也非常出色。

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测

两个带 OIS 和 3 倍及 6 倍无损变焦的长焦镜头还配备了 1/1.56 和 1/1.95 英寸的超大传感器，可实现潜望镜效果。配合数字 "AI 变焦"，Find X8 Ultra 可实现高达 120 倍的放大倍率。Find X8 Ultra 在 10 倍以内可以拍摄出非常出色的照片，10 倍以后则显得有些做作。

它的超广角镜头并不突出，但仍很有竞争力。特殊的光谱传感器为手机的设置锦上添花，该传感器旨在确保即使在困难的条件下也能获得准确的色彩。选择 "大师 "模式后，用户可以在 RAW 和 JPEG 格式中利用传感器的全部分辨率。

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测

您可以以 120 帧/秒的超高清画质录制视频，甚至是 HDR 视频。不过，由于超广角镜头仅支持 4K30，因此无法以 120 帧/秒的速度更换镜头。

这款手机的防抖功能以及色彩和白平衡调节功能总体上是成功的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angle
ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X8 Ultra: 6.25 ∆E min: 2.68 - max: 11.18 ∆E
ColorChecker
28 ∆E
39.2 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
21 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
25 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
35 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X8 Ultra: 30.76 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 44.53 ∆E

附件和保修 -Android 带电源的手机

包装盒内有一个模块化 100 瓦快速充电电源、一个保护盖、一条数据/充电线（USB-A 转 USB-C）、一个 SIM 卡针和一份快速入门指南。屏幕上预装了贴膜。

我们的进口设备提供 12 个月保修。如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的送货地址。

输入设备和操作 - 配备超声波传感器的 Oppo 手机

Find X8 Ultra 使用超声波传感器识别用户的指纹。这不仅比光学传感器更安全，因为它能检测深度和皮肤结构，而且不易受手指划痕或潮湿的影响。在日常使用中，Oppo 手机中的传感器工作非常迅速可靠。

如果你想使用面部数据解锁屏幕，可以通过前置摄像头来实现。不过，面部生物识别并不安全，因为它使用的是二维程序。

用户可享受高达 240 Hz 的屏幕采样率和 120 Hz 的刷新率。Oppo 安装了一个出色的振动电机，在日常使用中提供愉悦的触觉反馈。

显示屏 - 采用 LTPO 技术的 Oppo Find X8 Ultra

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。
OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色 LED 组成。

手机的 6.82 英寸 AMOLED 面板分辨率为 3,168 x 1,440 像素，可清晰显示内容。其像素密度高达 510 PPI。

该设备的亮度为 4,202 cd/m²，我们在更真实的 APL18 测试中注意到其亮度非常出色。不过，在播放 HDR 内容时，OLED 通常会更亮一些。但即便如此，这款手机在显示动态范围和对比度范围较宽的视频时也没有任何问题。

Find X8 Ultra 采用经典的脉宽调制技术来控制亮度，根据制造商的说法，它使用 PWM 调光和 2,160 Hz 的高频率工作。我们测得的 PWM 闪烁亮度很低，但频率与设备的帧频相适应。

1325
cd/m²		1326
cd/m²		1348
cd/m²
1299
cd/m²		1366
cd/m²		1320
cd/m²
1302
cd/m²		1333
cd/m²		1309
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1366 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1325.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.05 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1366 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.303
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"		Xiaomi 15 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"		Honor Magic7 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"		Oppo Find X8 Pro
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Screen
-26%
-84%
1%
-4%
Brightness middle
1366
1041
-24%
1357
-1%
1607
18%
1167
-15%
Brightness
1325
1059
-20%
1350
2%
1609
21%
1160
-12%
Brightness Distribution
95
96
1%
94
-1%
95
0%
98
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.88
1
-14%
3.1
-252%
0.9
-2%
0.87
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.55
2.7
-74%
4.7
-203%
1.8
-16%
1.64
-6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
1.9
-27%
2.2
-47%
1.7
-13%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.303 96%
2.23 99%
2 110%
2.24 98%
2.311 95%
CCT
6626 98%
6697 97%
6391 102%
6346 102%
6426 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 121 Hz
Amplitude: 40 %

The display backlight flickers at 121 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 121 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8414 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

除了选择各种色彩配置文件外，用户还可以调整 Find X8 Ultra 的白平衡。

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和照片光谱仪对其色彩校准进行了检查。在选择了 "专业 "配置文件后，我们发现它与参考色彩的偏差最小，而且色彩保真度非常高。

色彩准确度（配置文件：Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：Pro，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：Pro，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：Pro，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：Pro，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：Pro，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 1.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

我们在户外使用 OPPO 手机时没有发现任何问题，即使在阳光直射下也能从屏幕上读取内容。其视角稳定性也非常好。

性能 - 配备高通 SoC 的高端智能手机

Find X8 Ultra 与竞争对手的性能基本相当。 骁龙 8 精英版但在人工智能测试中，Oppo 手机有时表现较差。

不过 Adreno 830在 GFXBench 测试中表现尤为出色。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points +2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3145 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3099 Points -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3050 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 - 3228, n=18)
3028 Points -4%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2605 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=204, last 2 years)
1563 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points +3%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9722 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9685 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7784 - 10401, n=18)
9207 Points -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9019 Points -7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
7480 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=204, last 2 years)
4459 Points -54%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2760009 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2340778 - 3015111, n=14)
2688292 Points -3%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2534721 Points -8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2474369 Points -10%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
2374537 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2262067 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=139, last 2 years)
1309762 Points -53%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14862 - 27169, n=16)
21037 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +10%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20630 Points +9%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18897 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18590 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=191, last 2 years)
14075 Points -26%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12314 Points -35%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2354 Points +39%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2259 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1153 - 2674, n=12)
1991 Points +18%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1898 Points +12%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1689 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1145 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=153, last 2 years)
1002 Points -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
13729 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13325 Points +20%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11984 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8334 - 14066, n=13)
11183 Points +1%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11073 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
10697 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=153, last 2 years)
6855 Points -38%
System
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19891 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17171 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (10849 - 20776, n=13)
15673 Points +2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
15326 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14292 Points -7%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
12891 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=153, last 2 years)
10732 Points -30%
Memory
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
17503 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17355 Points +54%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15541 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7263 - 20572, n=13)
13330 Points +19%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11234 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
9432 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=153, last 2 years)
7606 Points -32%
Graphics
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
56004 Points +32%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
51041 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45562 Points +8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
43358 Points +2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
42332 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35527 - 51041, n=13)
41778 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=153, last 2 years)
19564 Points -54%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2322 Points +11%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2252 Points +7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2095 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
1923 Points -8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1901 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=13)
1875 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=153, last 2 years)
1619 Points -23%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
75143 Points +517%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23281 Points +91%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20782 Points +71%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19512 Points +60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=146, last 2 years)
17758 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=12)
17127 Points +41%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12176 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Mediatek Dimensity 9400, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 16384
51509 Points +5077%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
27433 Points +2657%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (787 - 307528, n=12)
27152 Points +2629%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2021 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1923 Points +93%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1796 Points +81%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
995 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=37, last 2 years)
908 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
262 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
248 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
240 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (137 - 287, n=4)
234 Points
Score V6
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12567 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10818 Points -14%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10742 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10621 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 12784, n=12)
7937 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=48, last 2 years)
4179 Points -67%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6907 Points +3%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6691 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5933 Points -11%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5794 Points -13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5383 Points -20%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6845 Points +2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6684 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6303 Points -6%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
5809 Points -13%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5800 Points -13%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26614 Points +3%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
25847 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23837 Points -8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
21937 Points -15%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12395 Points +4%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11973 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10066 Points -16%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9972 Points -17%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9461 Points -21%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12711 Points +6%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11983 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10634 Points -11%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
10070 Points -16%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9553 Points -20%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2538 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2397 Points -6%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2334 Points -8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2334 (17.3min - 17.3max) Points -8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2248 Points -11%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1998 Points -21%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2651 Points +3%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2584 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2272 Points -12%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2253 Points -13%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2253 (16.7min - 16.7max) Points -13%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2054 Points -21%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
776 fps
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
744 fps -4%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
717 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
713 fps -8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
631 fps -19%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +7%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +15%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
469 fps +14%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
418 fps +2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
411 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
368 fps -10%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
341 fps +5%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
324 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps -9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
293 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
284 fps -12%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +73%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
97 fps +62%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
212 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
179 fps -16%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
172 fps -19%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
161 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps +70%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps +67%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
91 fps +52%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
118 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps -9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
106 fps -10%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98 fps -17%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps -24%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
321 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
259 fps -19%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps -20%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
237 fps -26%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
53 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps -2%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
49 fps -8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -17%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41 fps -23%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
315.056 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
284.674 Points
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
257.756 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=13)
222 Points
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
215.998 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
138.7 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
425 runs/min
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
419 runs/min
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
390 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (244 - 419, n=6)
362 runs/min
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
269 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=143, last 2 years)
170.8 runs/min
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
29.3 runs/min
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
26.1 runs/min
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
25 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=11)
24.2 runs/min
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
16.3 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=97, last 2 years)
12.5 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
236 Points +75%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
196 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=12)
181.9 Points +35%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
171 Points +27%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
147 Points +9%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)
135 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=154, last 2 years)
129.1 Points -4%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
99202 Points +67%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
89248 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (37943 - 95506, n=15)
76707 Points +29%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
73424 Points +24%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
60987 Points +3%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)
59387 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
43311 Points -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1352 ms * -121%
Oppo Find X8 Pro (Chrome 131)
625.4 ms * -2%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra (Chrome 136)
612.34 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 873, n=13)
531 ms * +13%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra (Chrome 132)
508.2 ms * +17%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
429.4 ms * +30%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)
376.8 ms * +38%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Find X8 UltraXiaomi 15 UltraSamsung Galaxy S25 UltraHonor Magic7 ProOppo Find X8 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
-11%
-7%
-21%
1%
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
3754.43
4109.79
9%
3823.28
2%
3910.81
4%
3482.9
-7%
3949 ?(3754 - 4110, n=4)
5%
2066 ?(270 - 4384, n=187, last 2 years)
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
3564.22
3761.19
6%
3361.24
-6%
3683.81
3%
3498.5
-2%
3565 ?(3464 - 3761, n=4)
0%
1681 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=187, last 2 years)
-53%
Random Read 4KB
375.9
312.69
-17%
287.85
-23%
282.34
-25%
375.7
0%
339 ?(311 - 376, n=4)
-10%
286 ?(47.6 - 504, n=187, last 2 years)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
389.28
379.29
-3%
331.61
-15%
357.04
-8%
100.4
-74%
425 ?(379 - 522, n=4)
9%
328 ?(9.4 - 964, n=187, last 2 years)
-16%

排放 -Android 电话被节流

温度

对于这款 OPPO 旗舰机型来说，温度发展不是问题，即使是在长期负载的情况下也是如此。在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中，它的性能发展相对稳定，只出现了适度的节流。

Max. Load
 47.5 °C48.6 °C41.9 °C 
 48 °C49.1 °C41.8 °C 
 48.9 °C49.4 °C43.6 °C 
Maximum: 49.4 °C
Average: 46.5 °C
39.6 °C46.8 °C39.6 °C
43.2 °C46.7 °C40.7 °C
41.2 °C47.2 °C43.1 °C
Maximum: 47.2 °C
Average: 43.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.6 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.3 % +13%
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
81.4 %
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
63 % -23%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 % -29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % -33%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
88.9 %
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
67.6 % -24%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 % -35%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.3 % -41%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 %
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
66.6 % -29%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.5 % -41%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -47%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
% -100%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
93.6 %
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.4 % -27%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65 % -31%
Oppo Find X8 Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 % -35%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 % -46%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø36.6 (35.6-40)
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø129.4 (115.5-141.9)
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø96 (74.7-129.7)
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø122.3 (112-151.3)
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.7 (23.5-36.4)
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø37.3 (36.9-39.3)
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø18 (17.6-18.8)
Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (11.3-16.6)

发言人

Find X8 Ultra 的立体声扬声器提供了不错的音效，但缺乏一点深度，在粉红噪声测量中，高音明显衰减。此外，还可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.4 输出声音。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2049.337.82541.737.23132.233.6403331.95036.538.26323.9258019.725.210020.737.61251948.21602154.220019.858.525018.459.131519.561.840018.558.850019.364.963023.270.880023.868.3100021.171.3125018.972.2160020.772.9200020.772.7250017.870.9315017.567.6400018.166.8500023.272.1630020.277.9800023.675.81000017.870.61250018.860.21600018.454.1SPL32.984.2N1.860.9median 19.5median 67.6Delta1.56.345.943.940.635.334.832.134.433.837.835.527.728.118.431.421.241.924.44823.653.622.458.819.562.219.866.414.464.812.86914.275.613.173.212.473.110.773.810.875.210.576.511.278.611.779.512.270.811.970.712.177.412.277.212.177.911.859.411.454.12587.80.776.1median 12.2median 73.12.67.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X8 UltraOppo Find X8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X8 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find X8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 高端智能手机充电迅速

耗电量

在我们的测量中，我们发现这款 OPPO 手机具有很高的效率。

其 6100 毫安时电池的充电功率可达 100 瓦，无线充电功率最高可达 50 瓦。使用附带的电源适配器，我们注意到充电时间约为 40 分钟。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.1 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 8.5 / 11.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
6100 mAh		Xiaomi 15 Ultra
5410 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh		Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
24%
0%
-16%
25%
-3%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.49
39%
0.55
31%
0.94
-18%
0.6
25%
0.837 ?(0.49 - 1.5, n=15)
-5%
0.873 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=158, last 2 years)
-9%
Idle Average *
1.1
0.87
21%
0.77
30%
1.5
-36%
0.8
27%
1.296 ?(0.87 - 2.06, n=15)
-18%
1.41 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=158, last 2 years)
-28%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
0.94
41%
0.91
43%
1.57
2%
0.9
44%
1.475 ?(0.94 - 2.2, n=15)
8%
1.562 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=158, last 2 years)
2%
Load Average *
8.5
8.82
-4%
13.81
-62%
11.03
-30%
6.8
20%
8.62 ?(5.8 - 13, n=13)
-1%
7.01 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=149, last 2 years)
18%
Load Maximum *
11.8
9.26
22%
16.69
-41%
11.68
1%
10.9
8%
11.9 ?(8.86 - 19.2, n=13)
-1%
10.5 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=149, last 2 years)
11%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.15 (0.749-11.8)
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.39 (1.043-11.7)
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.775 (0.651-1.625)
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.012 (0.876-1.149)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.7 (8.48-11.8)
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.4 (11.1-11.7)
Oppo Find X8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.775 (0.651-1.625)
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.012 (0.876-1.149)

运行时间

在我们的电池测试中，这款旗舰手机的续航时间非常出色。

在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的情况下，与日常使用相关的结果最具可比性。在这种情况下，Find X8 Ultra 在使用 Wi-Fi 上网时可持续近 23 小时。

在无 WiFi 的无尽视频播放测试中，我们甚至测得超过 30 小时的续航时间。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 136)
22h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
33h 31min
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
6100 mAh		Xiaomi 15 Ultra
5410 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh		Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh		Oppo Find X8 Pro
5910 mAh
Battery Runtime
-13%
-4%
-1%
1%
H.264
2011
1650
-18%
1935
-4%
1806
-10%
1976
-2%
WiFi v1.3
1374
1270
-8%
1331
-3%
1481
8%
1411
3%

Notebookcheck 总评分

Oppo Find X8 Ultra 拥有最出色的硬件和出色的相机质量。

Oppo Find X8 Ultra - 05/27/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 95%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
65 / 69 → 95%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
93%
Games Performance
53 / 55 → 96%
Application Performance
78 / 85 → 92%
AI Performance
19%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
85 / 90 → 95%
Camera
88%
Average
68%
91%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
96.2%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
80%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 46.9%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摄像头怪兽让Apple iPhone 降级--Oppo Find X8 Ultra 智能手机评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-05-29 (Update: 2025-05-29)