OPPO Find X9s Pro 评测：这款迷你旗舰在关键方面让Galaxy S26相形见绌

Name: Oppo Find X9s Pro
Brand: Oppo

小巧机身，功能强大。

作为Find X9 Pro的“小弟”，这款手机配备了超大容量电池和双2亿像素摄像头。尽管如此，OPPO新款Android 智能手机依然相对轻薄。在本篇评测中，我们将探讨Find X9s Pro是否真的比Apple 、iPhone 17或三星Galaxy S26更具竞争力。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 06/12/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Wi-Fi 7 Touchscreen Smartphone

对OPPO Find X9s Pro的评测

如果你正在寻找一款便携的旗舰级智能手机，且注重出色的拍照性能和持久的续航能力，OPPO Find X9s Pro 或许是一个极具吸引力的选择。

特别是，Find X9s Pro 堪称三星Galaxy S26和Apple iPhone 17等机型的有力替代者，因为这些竞争对手在上述两个方面表现明显逊色。

Test device courtesy of tradingshenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

在精湛的工艺、摄像头配置以及XXL大容量电池等方面，OPPO这款迷你旗舰机型沿袭了其“大姐”机型Find X9 Pro的设计。

另一方面，Find X9s Pro在某些方面却缺乏“Pro”应有的特质——无论是USB 2.0接口、屏幕校准、联发科天玑9500 SoC的实际性能，还是软件、导航等方面。

此外，Find X9s Pro在欧洲地区无法购买也是一大劣势，且作为进口设备，其定价也并不算亲民。

Pros

+ 高品质且小巧的机身

+ IP69级防水防尘

+ 超窄边框显示屏

+ 在同级别机型中表现出色的摄像头

+ 大容量电池

Cons

- 仅支持 USB 2.0

- 性能略有下降

- 不支持 LTE 频段 20

- 欧洲地区暂无货

OPPO Find X9s Pro 的价格与上市情况

OPPO Find X9s Pro 目前仅在中国市场发售，起售价为 5,299 元（约合 660 欧元）。该机型尚未确认是否会在国际市场上市，但可能性不大。

作为进口机型，这款“迷你旗舰”在 Trading Shenzhen 的起售价为807 欧元。

$639.91
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlocked Android Smartphone with Gemini, Triple Rear Camera System, 24-Hour Battery, and 6.8" Super Actua Display - Hazel - 128 GB
$10.80
linsuyu Case Compatible with Oppo Find X9s Pro, Compatible with Oppo Find X9s Pro PU Leather Grain Magnetic snap Phone case-Green
$10.80
Jiajihua Case Compatible with Oppo Find X9s Pro 2 in 1 Lens Protection Shockproof and Anti-Drop Cover Grey

对OPPO Find X9s Pro的评测
OPPO Find X9s Pro 规格参数
设计：具备IP68级防水性能的旗舰手机
特点：一款支持USB OTG功能的高端紧凑型智能手机，但不支持USB 3.2
软件：OPPO Find X9s Pro，搭载Android.16，支持德语
通信与GNSS：支持5G和Wi-Fi 7的Find X9s Pro
通话功能与通话质量：欧洲版 Find X9s Pro 不支持 eSIM
相机：配备两个2亿像素传感器的紧凑型手机，例如Find X9 Ultra
配件与保修：OPPO Find X9s Pro 随附快充充电器和手机壳
输入设备与操作：超声波指纹传感器，例如Galaxy S26和小米17
屏幕：比 Find X9 Ultra 更小，但 OLED 屏幕清晰度极高
性能：Find X9s Pro 搭载的 Dimensity 9500 芯片确保了高速运行
排放：Dimensity 9500 因废热过高而降频
电池续航：小巧的智能手机，配备大容量电池
Notebookcheck 对 OPPO Find X9s Pro 的总体印象
潜在竞争对手的对比

OPPO Find X9s Pro 规格参数

Oppo Find X9s Pro (Find X9 Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 9500 8c/8t, 1 x 4.2 GHz ARM C1-Ultra, 3 x 3.5 GHz ARM C1-Premium, 4 x 2.7 GHz ARM C1-Pro, Cortex-X930 Travis / Cortex-A730 6x Gelas

Graphics adapter

Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5X

Display

6.32 inch 19.5:9 , 2640 x 1216 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, LTPO OLED, 3.840Hz PWM Dimming, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 454 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.1, 2G GSM: 850/900/1800 MHz; 3G WCDMA: Bänder 1/2/4/5/6/8/19; 4G LTE FDD: Bänder 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/25/26/28/66; 4G LTE TDD: Bänder 34/38/39/40/41/42/43/48; 5G NR: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n18/n25/n26/n28/n34/n38/n39/n40/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78/n79, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 150.5 x 71.7

Battery

7025 mAh Silicon-Carbon

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.6, 23 mm, 1/1.4", 0.56µm, OIS) + 200 MPix (f/2.6, 65 mm, telephoto, 1/1.56", OIS, 2.8x optical) + 50 MPox (f/2.0, 15 mm, ultrawide)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.4, 21 mm)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, chager, case, USB cable, ColorOS, 12 Months Warranty, GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), BDS (B1l+B1C+ B2a+B2b), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | SBC, AAC, LDAC, aptX, aptX HD, LHDC 5.0, fanless, waterproof

Weight

198 g, Power Supply: 107 g

Price

800 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

设计：具备IP68级防水性能的旗舰手机

与 Find X9 Pro不同，Find X9s Pro 采用更为紧凑的机身设计，因此专为偏爱小屏智能手机的用户打造。得益于窄边框设计，Find X9s Pro 机身极为紧凑，屏占比高达 90.7%。这款 6.32 英寸的 OPPO 智能手机尽管配备了 7,025 mAh 大容量电池，重量却仅为 198 克。

机身采用铝制一体式框架和玻璃背板，符合 IP68 和 IP69 防尘防水标准，手感极佳。目前尚无法确定其采用何种保护玻璃。

尺寸对比

特点：一款支持USB OTG功能的高端紧凑型智能手机，但不支持USB 3.2

Find X9s Pro 提供多种版本，最高配备 1 TB UFS 4.1 存储空间和 16 GB LPDDR5X 内存。其功能包括 NFC 和红外端口。该紧凑型旗舰手机的 USB 标准在产品规格表中并未明确标注。

不过，根据我们在数据传输速度方面的测试体验，以及该机型不支持有线图像输出的情况，我们推测其采用的是 USB 2.0 标准。因为即使是基础款 Find X9 都配备了 USB 3.2 Gen1 接口，若 Pro 版本采用更低规格，对 OPPO 而言将是一个令人费解的决定。

软件：OPPO Find X9s Pro，搭载Android.16，支持德语

Find X9s Pro预装了基于Android 16的ColorOS 16系统，并支持德语作为系统语言。关于中国版机型的软件支持计划，目前仍存在一些疑问。

制造商尚未透露这款便捷的旗舰智能手机将提供多少个Android 版本以及多少年的系统更新。不过，作为OPPO的高端机型，Find X9s Pro（理论上）应享有五次Android 系统更新和六年安全补丁的更新政策，但这尚未得到确认。

可持续发展

我们无法找到关于OPPO手机所用材料或其再生材料含量的任何信息。其包装显然不含塑料。

通信与GNSS：支持5G和Wi-Fi 7的Find X9s Pro

Find X9s Pro 支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准，配备两根发射天线和两根接收天线（2x2 MIMO）。在我们的测试中，Wi-Fi 6E 路由器成功识别了 6 GHz 频段，峰值传输速率高达近 2,000 MBit/s。

在移动网络连接方面，OPPO 提供了广泛的 5G 和 4G 网络频段，不过欧洲用户无法使用 LTE 频段 20 和 32。

Networking
Oppo Find X9s Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1225 (min: 729) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1976 (min: 1754) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	900 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	844 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1334 (min: 695) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1245 (min: 1159) MBit/s ∼63%
Oppo Find X9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1070 (min: 931) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1574 (min: 1254) MBit/s ∼80%
Vivo X300 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1843 (min: 1759) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1802 (min: 1718) MBit/s ∼91%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1046 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1278 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1501 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼76%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	694 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	740 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1264 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1399 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼71%

Oppo Find X9s Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1224 (729-1462) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (695-1394) MBit/s

Oppo Find X9s Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1976 (1754-2096) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1244 (1159-1257) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø885 (446-952) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy S26 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø841 (789-858) MBit/s

为了测试日常使用中的定位精度，我们通常会带着测试设备骑一段短途自行车，并记录行进路线。然而，在Find X9s Pro移动过程中，我们无法读取任何数据。Find X9s Pro最多只能通过双频GNSS来确定位置。

即使在室内，卫星定位也能正常工作，但建立连接需要很长时间。在室外使用这款OPPO手机进行定位同样耗时较长，且精度仅为10米，并不十分准确。这似乎是软件方面存在的问题。

通话功能与通话质量：欧洲版 Find X9s Pro 不支持 eSIM

Find X9s Pro 支持双卡双待，配备两个 nano-SIM 卡槽。不过，eSIM 在中国境外无法使用。通话质量始终令人满意，通话声音清晰。

相机：配备两个2亿像素传感器的紧凑型手机，例如Find X9 Ultra

尽管 Find X9s Pro 的体积比 Find X9 Ultra小得多，但其摄像头配置依然令人印象深刻。与更大尺寸的机型一样，OPPO为这款智能手机配备了两颗经过哈苏调校的2亿像素摄像头，不过这里并未采用Find X9 Ultra上所使用的相同传感器。

Find X9s Pro 呈现出极高的锐度与细节表现，尤其与 iPhone 17 的Apple 镜头拍摄效果相比更为突出。即便在弱光环境下，作为主摄的三星 ISOCELL HP9 也能拍出光线柔和、效果出众的照片，尽管其画质尚未达到顶尖水平。

超广角和长焦镜头则由这款较小的Pro机型继承自 Find X9 Pro。特别是配备3倍光学变焦和微距功能的2亿像素镜头所拍摄的变焦照片，在紧凑型机型中表现尤为出色。

此外，还可选配长焦转换器，使光学变焦倍率达到约11倍。不过，该套件在欧洲的供应情况尚不明确。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light Ultra wide-angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件与保修：OPPO Find X9s Pro 随附快充充电器和手机壳

Find X9s Pro 的包装内含手机保护壳、快充适配器和一条充电线（USB-C 转 USB-A）。屏幕上还贴有保护膜。我们借测的这款由 Trading Shenzhen 提供的机型，在包装内额外附赠了一个欧盟插头适配器。

我们这款进口设备附带12个月保修。如需保修服务，Trading Shenzhen 提供将智能手机寄送至德国收货地址的选项。

输入设备与操作：超声波指纹传感器，例如Galaxy S26和小米17

Find X9s Pro 的操作体验非常流畅。144Hz 显示屏的响应速度极快，OPPO 宣称其触控采样率最高可达 300Hz。

这款迷你旗舰智能手机采用超声波传感器进行身份验证，能够可靠地识别指纹，并迅速解锁 OLED 屏幕。此外，还通过安全性较低的 2D 面部解锁功能实现了面部生物识别。

屏幕：比 Find X9 Ultra 更小，但 OLED 屏幕清晰度极高

这款6.3英寸AMOLED显示屏拥有1216p分辨率，像素密度高达460 ppi，呈现出极高的画面清晰度。据称，这款刷新率范围为1 Hz至144 Hz的LTPO面板可达到1,800尼特的亮度（HBM），我们在APL测量中也证实了这一点。

在播放HDR视频时，OLED面板在我们的测量中通常具有更显著的亮度表现。然而，即使在HDR模式下，Find X9s Pro的HBM值也与之相当，这意味着 Vivo X300 的亮度则显著更高。

所采用的OLED技术需要通过脉宽调制（PWM）来控制屏幕亮度。据厂商称，该设备支持3,840 Hz的高频PWM调光，这能最大限度地减少OLED闪烁带来的负面影响。我们还使用Rigol示波器测得其基本频率为167 Hz。


1083 cd/m²	1103 cd/m²	1125 cd/m²
1102 cd/m²	1133 cd/m²	1112 cd/m²
1098 cd/m²	1103 cd/m²	1114 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1133 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1108.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1133 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.29 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.229
CCT: 7113 K

	Oppo Find X9s Pro LTPO OLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy S26 Dynamic AMOLED 2XDynamic AMOLED 2X, 8 Bit color depth, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Oppo Find X9 AMOLED, 2760x1256, 6.6"	Vivo X300 AMOLED, 2640x1216, 6.3"
Screen		17%	33%	33%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1133	1341 18%	1132 0%	1537 36%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1108	1337 21%	1114 1%	1523 37%
Brightness Distribution (%)	96	96 0%	97 1%	96 0%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.29	2.4 -5%	0.82 64%	1.4 39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.32	4 25%	1.95 63%	2.6 51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.2	1.9 41%	1 69%	2.1 34%
Gamma	2.229 ^99%	2.06 ^107%	2.244 ^98%	2.28 ^96%
CCT	7113 ^91%	6497 ^100%	6546 ^99%	6754 ^96%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2645 cd/m² +50%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2386 cd/m² +35%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1769 cd/m²

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4072 cd/m² +141%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2730 cd/m² +62%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1688 cd/m²

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

167.1 Hz
Amplitude: 15 %

The display backlight flickers at 167.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 167.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7810 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放比例和不同亮度设置的测量系列（在最低亮度下，振幅曲线看起来较为平坦，但这只是由于缩放比例所致。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图）

我们使用 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Portrait Displays 公司的 Calman Ultimate 软件进行的测量结果清楚地表明，该屏幕不仅亮度略低于 Vivo X300，在色彩还原方面的校准精度也较低。

话虽如此，在sRGB色域内，色调和灰度的偏差肉眼几乎难以察觉。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.4 ms rise
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.6 ms rise
3.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).

性能：Find X9s Pro 搭载的 Dimensity 9500 芯片确保了高速运行

尽管 Find X9s Pro 机身小巧，但联发科天玑9500 SoC 却能提供真正的旗舰级性能。在日常使用中，这款 OPPO 手机的运行速度也令人印象深刻，尽管联发科 SoC 的性能不如竞争对手，且略显收敛。特别是在Geekbench的多核性能测试中，其表现甚至不如尺寸更大的 Pro机型。

Find X9s Pro 在 PCMark 系统基准测试和 Geekbench AI 测试中的表现出人意料地薄弱。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	3511 Points +6%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	3508 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3269 - 3635, n=8)	3447 Points +4%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	3397 Points +3%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	3299 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	3060 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=203, last 2 years)	1850 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	10405 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	10388 Points +10%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10378 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (9402 - 10941, n=8)	10243 Points +9%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	9998 Points +6%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	9402 Points
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=203, last 2 years)	5492 Points -42%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	19914 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=157, last 2 years)	15198 Points +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (13432 - 17480, n=4)	14711 Points +10%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	13977 Points +4%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	13954 Points +4%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	13432 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2257 Points +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (1721 - 2177, n=2)	1949 Points +13%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	1721 Points
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=116, last 2 years)	1213 Points -30%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	12515 Points +6%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	11787 Points
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	11566 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (10620 - 11787, n=5)	11095 Points -6%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10756 Points -9%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	10744 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=131, last 2 years)	7957 Points -32%
System
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	16276 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	15554 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (14659 - 16276, n=5)	15525 Points -5%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	15499 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	14913 Points -8%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	14659 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=131, last 2 years)	11571 Points -29%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	16455 Points +51%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	11589 Points +6%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	10897 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (8243 - 13155, n=5)	10450 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=131, last 2 years)	9069 Points -17%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	8364 Points -23%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	8243 Points -24%
Graphics
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	48863 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	48852 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	48782 Points
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	46112 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (26660 - 48863, n=5)	43854 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	42333 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=131, last 2 years)	27904 Points -43%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2361 Points +5%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2245 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	2243 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (2105 - 2319, n=5)	2204 Points -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	2109 Points -6%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	2105 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=131, last 2 years)	1740 Points -22%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	22393 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=115, last 2 years)	20751 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (16866 - 19373, n=4)	17684 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	17376 Points
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	17121 Points -1%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	16866 Points -3%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=92, last 2 years)	17787 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2079 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	1620 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	753 Points +210%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=107, last 2 years)	678 Points +179%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	612 Points +152%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (190 - 834, n=7)	442 Points +82%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	243 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	192 Points -21%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	190 Points -22%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=107, last 2 years)	2671 Points +1066%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	759 Points +231%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	621 Points +171%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (176 - 833, n=7)	439 Points +92%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	229 Points
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	180 Points -21%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	176 Points -23%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=107, last 2 years)	3977 Points +732%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	1623 Points +240%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	1409 Points +195%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (432 - 1744, n=7)	993 Points +108%
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	478 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	436 Points -9%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	432 Points -10%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=30, last 2 years)	592 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	216 Points
Score V6
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	16576 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (765 - 21660, n=4)	9942 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=82, last 2 years)	5674 Points -66%
Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	768 Points -95%
Oppo Find X9 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	765 Points -95%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	Points -100%

Antutu v11 - Score
Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384	3692957 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3500521 - 3692957, n=3)	3577928 Points -3%
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 12288	3540306 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	3296169 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=34, last 2 years)	2614114 Points -29%

这款紧凑型OPPO旗舰机的GPU单元是 Mali G1-Ultra ，拥有十二个核心。在我们的测试中，其性能表现参差不齐。虽然Find X9s Pro在某些基准测试中表现优异，但在GFXBench的其他测试中成绩却相当低。

由于我们在每次基准测试之间都会让测试设备冷却，因此不太可能是温度问题导致了这种不一致。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7211 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7198 Points 0%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7101 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6788 Points -6%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4678 Points -35%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7167 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7167 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7122 Points -1%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7089 Points -1%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6251 Points -13%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26692 Points +1%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26476 Points +1%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26389 Points 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26325 Points
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	25978 Points -1%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14788 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14487 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13651 Points -6%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9619 Points -34%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14635 Points +2%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	14411 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13952 Points -3%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9739 Points -32%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3268 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3208 Points -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3198 Points -2%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3163 Points -3%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3134 Points -4%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3268 (24.2^min - 24.2^max) Points
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3211 Points -2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3211 Points -2%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3145 Points -4%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2650 Points -19%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps +2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	954 fps +6%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	946 fps +5%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	898 fps
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	755 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	710 fps -21%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps +2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	606 fps +138%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	456 fps +79%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	435 fps +71%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	378 fps +48%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	255 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps +2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	383 fps +73%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	369 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	321 fps +45%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	284 fps +29%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	221 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps +2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	203 fps +33%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	199 fps +30%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	179 fps +17%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	153 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	153 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +67%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +67%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72 fps
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps -15%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	151 fps
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	146 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	117 fps -23%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	109 fps -28%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps +2%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	361 fps +16%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	311 fps
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	287 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	279 fps -10%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	211 fps -32%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	63 fps
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps -8%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	48 fps -24%
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	41 fps -35%

Jetstream 2 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 5

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total
Oppo Find X9s Pro (Chrome 148)	278.586 Points
Vivo X300 (Chrome 143)	267.654 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (108 - 362, n=7)	247 Points -11%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	235.769 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=82, last 2 years)	216 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S26	Points -100%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Chrome 146)	92374 Points +38%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (64064 - 96438, n=4)	75476 Points +13%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	74649 Points +12%
Oppo Find X9s Pro (Chrome 148)	66753 Points
Oppo Find X9 (Chrome 142)	64064 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=161, last 2 years)	51576 Points -23%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=139, last 2 years)	1071 ms * -118%
Vivo X300 (Chrome 143)	663.7 ms * -35%
Oppo Find X9 Pro (Chrome 141)	503.8 ms * -2%
Oppo Find X9 (Chrome 142)	494.9 ms * -1%
Oppo Find X9s Pro (Chrome 148)	491.6 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (372 - 664, n=6)	483 ms * +2%
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Chrome 146)	374.4 ms * +24%

WebXPRT 5 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S26 (Chrome 146)	95 Points +27%
Oppo Find X9s Pro	75 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (n=1)	75 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 104, n=12, last 2 years)	64.8 Points -14%

* ... smaller is better

	Oppo Find X9s Pro	Oppo Find X9	Oppo Find X9 Pro	Vivo X300	Samsung Galaxy S26	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-19%	-21%	28%	0%	42%	-4%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3375.6	3232.3 -4%	3219.8 -5%	2056.87 -39%	3923.49 16%	3635 ?(1954 - 4366, n=39) 8%	2253 ?(270 - 4370, n=185, last 2 years) -33%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1987.03	1565.8 -21%	1239.76 -38%	1997.76 1%	2718.09 37%	3164 ?(339 - 4113, n=39) 59%	1928 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=185, last 2 years) -3%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	434.19	335.7 -23%	367.54 -15%	332.61 -23%	418.42 -4%	413 ?(279 - 614, n=39) -5%	309 ?(47.6 - 614, n=185, last 2 years) -29%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	239.9	172.6 -28%	176.98 -26%	654.09 173%	124.05 -48%	491 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=39) 105%	361 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=185, last 2 years) 50%

排放：Dimensity 9500 因废热过高而降频

温度

我们的测量数据显示，Find X9s Pro 在高负载状态下的表面温度较高，但数值仍在安全范围内。

我们还通过 3DMark 压力测试观察了其降频表现。当压力测试重复进行 20 次时，该机型 SoC 的降频比例显著低于竞品。

Max. Load

Idle


48 °C	47.4 °C	44.5 °C
48.4 °C	46.7 °C	43.8 °C
48.3 °C	48.1 °C	44.8 °C

Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 46.7 °C


43.8 °C	45.5 °C	45.7 °C
43.2 °C	46.2 °C	43.2 °C
42.4 °C	46.8 °C	48.4 °C

Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 45 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.2 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	99.6 % +1%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	98.6 %
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	89.3 % -9%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58.9 % -40%
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	45.2 % -54%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Oppo Find X9 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	74.3 % +24%
Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60.1 %
Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	48.8 % -19%
Vivo X300 Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	46.7 % -22%
Oppo Find X9 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	38.7 % -36%

Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.9 (25.9-43) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø26.1 (21.2-43.3) %

Oppo Find X9s Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø82.4 (81.7-82.8) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø93.6 (72.4-160.2) %

Samsung Galaxy S26 Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø30.9 (24.2-47.2) %

扬声器

Find X9s Pro 的双扬声器为这款小巧的智能手机带来了强劲的音效。不过，在播放粉红噪声时，超高频扬声器的表现明显有所下降。

通过 USB 接口或蓝牙 6.1 无线连接，可获得更出色的高清音频输出。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Find X9s Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find X9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航：小巧的智能手机，配备大容量电池

能源消耗

Find X9s Pro 配备的 7,025 mAh 碳硅电池在紧凑型手机中容量相当可观，可通过 USB-C 接口以最高 80 W 的功率快速充电。该智能手机还支持最高 50 W 的无线充电。

不过，其功耗表现仍有提升空间，尤其是在待机模式下。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.7 / 2.3 / 2.6 Watt
Load	8.3 / 11.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Find X9s Pro 7025 mAh	Oppo Find X9 7025 mAh	Oppo Find X9 Pro 7500 mAh	Vivo X300 5360 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26 4300 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 9500	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		11%	38%	32%	23%	12%	29%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1.7	1.2 29%	0.6 65%	0.6 65%	0.45 74%	0.992 ?(0.6 - 1.7, n=5) 42%	0.872 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=143, last 2 years) 49%
Idle Average * (Watt)	2.3	1.8 22%	1 57%	2.02 12%	0.75 67%	1.784 ?(1 - 2.3, n=5) 22%	1.463 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=143, last 2 years) 36%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.6	2.5 4%	1.3 50%	2.08 20%	0.93 64%	2.07 ?(1.3 - 2.6, n=5) 20%	1.65 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=143, last 2 years) 37%
Load Average * (Watt)	8.3	7.9 5%	6.9 17%		12.4 -49%	8.43 ?(6.9 - 10.6, n=4) -2%	6.84 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=112, last 2 years) 18%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.9	12.2 -3%	11.9 -0%		16.75 -41%	14.5 ?(11.9 - 22, n=4) -22%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=112, last 2 years) 5%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.73 (4.15-11.9) Watt

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.27 (0.745-16.7) Watt

Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.01 (2.78-3.6) Watt

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.637 (0.586-0.955) Watt

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (8.77-11.7) Watt

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.69 (5.79-6.88) Watt

Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.01 (2.78-3.6) Watt

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.637 (0.586-0.955) Watt

电池续航时间

在无线局域网（WLAN）电池测试中，我们始终将屏幕亮度调整为150 cd/m²作为基准进行对比。在此测试中，Find X9s Pro的续航时间比 Galaxy S26 ，因此处于不同的级别。

然而，这款OPPO手机在低负载下的能效仍有待提升，这导致其续航能力相较于同门机型 Find X9 和 Find X9 Pro相比，续航能力明显逊色。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 148)		27h 19min

	Oppo Find X9s Pro 7025 mAh	Oppo Find X9 7025 mAh	Oppo Find X9 Pro 7500 mAh	Vivo X300 5360 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26 4300 mAh
Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3 (h)	27.3	29.1 7%	34.3 26%	19.6 -28%	17.7 -35%

Notebookcheck 对 OPPO Find X9s Pro 的总体印象

从某些方面来看，OPPO Find X9s Pro并不像Find X系列中的Pro机型。尽管如此，这款紧凑型Android 手机仍是一款值得关注的替代选择，尤其在续航能力和拍照质量方面，它与Galaxy S26或iPhone 17形成了鲜明对比。

Back to the verdict

Oppo Find X9s Pro - 06/05/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

54 / 69 → 78%

Weight

88%

Battery

95%

Display

90%

Games Performance

45 / 55 → 81%

Application Performance

77 / 85 → 90%

AI Performance

15%

Temperature

80%

Noise

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

86%

Average

69%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
90%

Power Use
93.3%

Repairability
30%

Software Updates
83.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 53.6%

潜在竞争对手的对比

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 87%	Oppo Find X9s Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $639.91 Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo... 2. $10.80 linsuyu Case Compatible with... 3. $10.80 Jiajihua Case Compatible wit... List Price: 800€	198 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.32" 2640x1216 460 PPI LTPO OLED
2. 86.1%	Oppo Find X9 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 999€	203 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.59" 2760x1256 460 PPI AMOLED
3. 88%	Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘ Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 1049€	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.31" 2640x1216 461 PPI AMOLED
4. 88.3%	Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 960 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 999€	167 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.30" 2340x1080 409 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2XDynamic AMOLED 2X, 8 Bit color depth

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

OPPO Find X9s Pro 评测：这款迷你旗舰在关键方面让Galaxy S26相形见绌

小巧机身，功能强大。

对OPPO Find X9s Pro的评测

Pros

Cons

OPPO Find X9s Pro 的价格与上市情况

Table of Contents

OPPO Find X9s Pro 规格参数

设计：具备IP68级防水性能的旗舰手机

尺寸对比

特点：一款支持USB OTG功能的高端紧凑型智能手机，但不支持USB 3.2

软件：OPPO Find X9s Pro，搭载Android.16，支持德语

可持续发展

通信与GNSS：支持5G和Wi-Fi 7的Find X9s Pro

通话功能与通话质量：欧洲版 Find X9s Pro 不支持 eSIM

相机：配备两个2亿像素传感器的紧凑型手机，例如Find X9 Ultra

配件与保修：OPPO Find X9s Pro 随附快充充电器和手机壳

输入设备与操作：超声波指纹传感器，例如Galaxy S26和小米17

屏幕：比 Find X9 Ultra 更小，但 OLED 屏幕清晰度极高

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能：Find X9s Pro 搭载的 Dimensity 9500 芯片确保了高速运行

排放：Dimensity 9500 因废热过高而降频

温度

3DMark 压力测试

扬声器

Oppo Find X9s Pro audio analysis

Oppo Find X9 audio analysis

电池续航：小巧的智能手机，配备大容量电池

能源消耗

功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）

功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 对 OPPO Find X9s Pro 的总体印象

潜在竞争对手的对比

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles