Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 评测--新的中端顶级产品？

优点 明亮的曲面显示屏、强大的 200MP 摄像头、出色的性能和 120 瓦快速充电：凭借这些功能，小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 旨在撼动中端智能手机市场。这款手机还配备了 IP68 认证的玻璃外壳、WiFi 6 和 eSIM 支持。我们的评测将展示竞争产品的比较。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

Redmi Note 小米的智能手机非常受欢迎，因为这些中端设备以相对适中的价格提供了可靠的功能和性能。今年的产品系列包括 5 款机型，也不例外。

2024Redmi Note 系列从 小米Redmi Note 13 4G价格约为 220 美元。随后是Redmi Note 13 5G、Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 和 Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G.Redmi Note 五款产品中最顶级的是我们的测试机Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G，起价约为 460 美元。

尽管Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的 "plus "后缀并不显眼，但它与Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 有很大不同，后者的售价已接近 330 美元大关。13 Pro+ 5G 同样配备了 2 亿像素的摄像头，但在此基础上，他们还获得了更快的 SoC、更强的充电能力、圆形显示屏和更高的防护等级（IP68）。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Redmi Note 13 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A715 / A510
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G610 MP4
Memory
12 GB 
, or 16GB
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, Capacitive, OLED, Gorilla Glass Victus, 1800 Nits peak brightness, 1920 Hz PWM dimming, DCI-P3 100%, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 256GB / 512GB, 473 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Dolby Atmos
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM, CDMA, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 161.4 x 74.2
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 120W Hypercharge
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.7, 1/1.4", 0.56µm) + 8MP (f/2.2, 1/4", 1.12µm) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.4); video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, 120W charger, USB-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, safety information, quick start guide, warranty card, MIUI 14, 24 Months Warranty, IP68 rating, Head SAR 0,983 W/kg, Body SAR 0.997 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
204.5 g, Power Supply: 170 g
Price
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.4 %
03/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4		204.5 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
87.1 %
06/2023
Google Pixel 7a
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		193.5 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
84.6 %
10/2023
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3		170 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
86 %
05/2023
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2340x1080
83.1 %
09/2023
Sony Xperia 10 V
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.10"2520x1080
86.1 %
03/2024
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6		186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220
85.8 %
01/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710		187 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2712x1220

小米公司推出的Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 有了新的突破，因为它是首款不仅拥有曲面显示屏，而且还通过了 IP68 认证的Redmi Note 智能手机，可以防尘防水。屏幕由耐用的大猩猩玻璃 Victus 保护，并预装了屏幕保护膜。

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 有三种颜色（极光紫、午夜黑和月光白），均采用玻璃后壳，与Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 不同的是，玻璃后壳是光面而不是磨砂面，因此非常容易沾染指纹。如果把智能手机放在附带的保护套中，就可以避免这种情况。否则，摄像头模块会从后盖突出约 3 毫米，导致其来回晃动。

总的来说，Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的质感和外观都不错。它的稳定性也很好，在我们的测试中没有出现明显的翘曲或凹陷。在日常使用中，你可能不会注意到它只有塑料边框这一事实。小米手机的重量为 204 克，与三星手机的重量差不多。 三星Galaxy A54.

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

潜在的竞争对手比较

❌
161.4 mm 74.2 mm 8.9 mm 204.5 g161.2 mm 74.3 mm 8 mm 187 g160.45 mm 74.34 mm 8.25 mm 186 g159.6 mm 72 mm 7.8 mm 170 g158.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 202 g155 mm 68 mm 8.3 mm 159 g152 mm 72.9 mm 9 mm 193.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 最高 12GB 内存和 512GB 存储空间

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 有两种存储配置可供选择：

  • 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间：约 465 美元
  • 12 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间：约 540 美元

两种存储版本均使用 LPDDR5 内存和快速 UFS-3.1 存储。Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 只能使用较慢的 LPDDR4 内存和 UFS-2.2 存储空间。由于手机没有 microSD 卡插槽，因此无法扩展存储空间。您可以安装两张 nano SIM 卡，也可以安装一张 nano SIM 卡并使用 eSIM 卡。

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 配备了红外爆破器，可以与智能电视等兼容的终端设备一起使用，这也是小米手机的典型特色。该手机在价格上的让步包括其永远在线的显示屏（点按后仅激活 10 秒），以及其支持 OTG 的 USB-C 端口（内部仅以 USB 2.0 速度连接），在我们使用三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘进行的复制测试中，其数据吞吐量为 32.3 MB/s。虽然目前Redmi Note 系列的其他智能手机都有 3.5 毫米耳机插孔，但小米在Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 上省略了它。

左：无连接
左：无连接
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
右：音量摇杆、电源按钮
顶部：麦克风、扬声器、麦克风、红外爆破器
顶部：麦克风、扬声器、麦克风、红外爆破器
底部：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双 SIM 卡
底部：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、麦克风、双 SIM 卡

软件 - MIUI 14 包含大量臃肿软件

小米的用户界面 MIUI 14 在Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 上运行，它基于Android 13。这款智能手机将接受三年的Android 升级，安全补丁将推出四年。在 3 月中旬进行测试时，其最后一次Android 安全更新是从 2024 年 1 月 1 日开始的，因此并非完全最新。

出厂时，小米手机预装了大量应用程序，其中大部分属于 "膨胀软件"。在我们新安装的 512GB 测试设备上，只有 473 GB 的存储空间可以自由使用，因为操作系统和应用程序加在一起占用了将近 39 GB 的存储空间。值得庆幸的是，第三方应用程序都可以删除。

另一方面，要删除小米公司集成在应用程序中的广告就有点困难了。虽然你可以在网上找到很多说明，告诉你如何停用显示的广告，但用户要完成所有步骤确实需要相当长的时间。

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 6 的小米手机

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 拥有 20 个 4G 频段和 13 个 5G 频段，支持欧盟地区所有重要的蜂窝频率，我们的测试就是在欧盟地区进行的。在世界其他地区使用也应该没有大问题。

在短距离内，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 使用蓝牙 5.3 和 WiFi 6。后者是目前Redmi Note 系列独有的，因为其他四款设备只能使用 WiFi 5。

与华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器连接后，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 实现了良好的 WiFi 数据吞吐量，在发送和接收方向上都基本稳定。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
848 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
881 (min: 669) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 7a
iperf3 receive AXE11000
957 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
819 (min: 499) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
930 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
934 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼68%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
878 (min: 686) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
668 (min: 436) MBit/s ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
843 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
750 (min: 546) MBit/s ∼85%
Sony Xperia 10 V
iperf3 receive AXE11000
347 (min: 332) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
363 (min: 180) MBit/s ∼41%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
581 (min: 491) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
678 (min: 544) MBit/s ∼77%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, ARM Mali-G610 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø832 (445-913)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø842 (813-856)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (491-618)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, ARM Mali-G610 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (669-965)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (546-831)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (544-711)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 借助单频 GPS、Glonass、Galileo、Beidou 和 QZSS 卫星导航服务确定当前位置。在室外，这款智能手机的定位精度高达 1 米。

我们的实际测试表明，如果不完全依赖于精确度，小米手机作为导航设备也能胜任。在我们 10 公里的自行车旅行中，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 记录路线的精确度远远低于我们用作参考设备的 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：环湖旅行
GPS 测试：环湖旅行
GPS 测试：转折点
GPS 测试：转折点

电话功能和通话质量

除了 VoLTE 外，小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 还支持 WLAN 通话，并可容纳两张 nano-SIM 卡。此外，您还可以激活一张 eSIM 卡，但代价是必须放弃一个物理 SIM 卡插槽。

在我们的测试中，小米手机在通话过程中提供了良好的通话质量，并相当有效地抑制了背景噪音。使用扬声器时，我们的声音也传输得很清晰。

照相机 - 200-MP 照相机，配有 Samsung ISOCELL HP3

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的摄像头规格与 Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G但在实际使用中，我们测试样品的照片看起来更好。只有它们的自拍摄像头差不多。13 Pro+ 5G 的镜头位于一个冲孔式切口内，具有 1600 万像素的分辨率，在视频通话时看起来效果不错，拍摄的人像照片也很美观，细节层次分明。

与前代产品相同，12 Pro+ 5G Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G一样，新机型的主摄像头也采用了 200MP 图像传感器。1/1.4 英寸的三星 ISOCELL HP3 标配将 16 个相邻像素合成一个像素，从而获得 12.5 百万像素的照片。该图像感应器具有电子和光学防抖功能。这种 16 比 1 的像素分级确保了在光线不足的条件下仍能保持较高的出光率。由于没有远摄镜头，数码变焦最高只能达到 10 倍。

200 MP图像模式可让您充分利用三星 ISOCELL HP3 的全部分辨率。不过，您必须确保有足够的光线才能拍出好照片--相机软件明确指出了这一点。相机的其他设置并不像主摄像头那样出色，因为它并没有提供什么特别的功能，只有一个 800 万像素的超广角摄像头和一个 200 万像素的微距传感器。

使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用超广角镜头拍摄的照片
使用超广角镜头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片
使用主摄像头拍摄的照片

在日光下，手机主摄像头拍摄的照片效果极佳，色彩描绘自然，与昂贵得多的智能手机摄像头拍摄的照片相比毫不逊色。虽然等级之间存在差异，但你必须仔细观察才能发现。当你把目光投向照片中非常亮和非常暗的区域时，差异就会变得很明显，因为更好的相机镜头，如 谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro的 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra等更好的相机镜头能够获得更好的细节。

与同价位的其他产品相比，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的照片质量高于平均水平，即使在弱光环境下也是如此。主摄像头得益于其 f/1.65 大光圈，因此仍能拍摄出大量被摄体。虽然夜间的细节水平有所下降，但图像中仅有少量噪点。

这款智能手机最高可录制 4K 30fps 的优质视频。主镜头和超广角镜头之间的切换最高可达 1080p。使用该模式，可以最高 60fps 的速度录制视频。

在其他摄像头方面，小米手机与高端智能手机保持着一定的距离，这一点从它没有长焦镜头就能看出来。其超广角摄像头使用的白平衡与主摄像头略有不同，拍出的照片也很清晰，与廉价智能手机相比毫不逊色。照片的细节和色彩都不错，但边缘比较模糊。微距摄像头的分辨率为 200 万像素，实用性不强，因为主摄像头的数码变焦能拍出更好的特写。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo

在我们的测试实验室中，主摄像头显示它能在最佳照明条件下非常准确地捕捉色彩（最大 Delta-E 值为 8.05）。它还能非常清晰地再现测试图表。在 1 勒克斯的残余光照条件下，测试图仍然可以辨认，但只是显示得非常暗。

ColorChecker
4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G: 4.84 ∆E min: 2.19 - max: 8.05 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
60.4 ∆E
51.3 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
61.8 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
72 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
84 ∆E
69.5 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G: 45.37 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 84.02 ∆E

附件和保修 - 含 120 瓦电源

附带的 120 瓦电源
附带的 120 瓦电源

小米为Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 配备了 120 瓦电源（最高 20V/6A）、USB-C 数据线、SIM 卡工具、保护套、包括保修信息在内的简短说明书以及另一份安全说明单页。

在美国，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 提供 12 个月的标准保修。

输入设备和操作 - 指纹传感器可测量心率

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的触摸屏对输入的反应非常迅速和精确。游戏时，其触摸采样率从标准的 240 Hz 提高到 2160 Hz。物理按键反馈清晰，牢牢固定在机壳内，几乎无法向两侧晃动。它的线性振动电机非常安静，即使在最高设置下，振动也非常微弱。

在我们的测试中，位于手机屏幕下方的指纹传感器可以快速、可靠地解锁设备。此外，它还可以用来测量心率，但当然不能取代医疗设备。另一种生物识别认证方法是 2D 面部识别。面部解锁依赖于良好的环境光线，在我们的测试中，它和通过指纹传感器解锁手机一样容易。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 120 赫兹 AMOLED 屏幕，亮度高达 1700 cd/m²

子像素
子像素

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 面板分辨率为 2712 x 1220 像素，像素密度高达 446 PPI。除了 HDR10 和 HDR10+，该屏幕还支持 Dolby Vision 和 HLG。在标准设置中，AMOLED 面板会根据显示内容自动切换到 60 或 120 Hz。刷新率可选择永久设置为 60 或 120 Hz。

在显示纯白背景时，AMOLED 面板的平均亮度为 1233 cd/m²，这意味着它比这个价位的平均亮度更高。然而，它还能做得更多。在描绘均匀的明暗区域时（APL18 测量），其最大亮度升至 1714 cd/m²，非常接近制造商规定的 1800 nits 值。在显示 HDR 内容时，我们无法从显示器中获得超过 1178 cd/m² 的亮度。使用最低亮度设置时，它的亮度为 2.36 cd/m²。

为了减少 OLED 闪烁，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 使用 PWM 调光，频率高达 1920 Hz。我们在最低亮度下仅测得 1428 Hz（第一张 Rigol 截图），但这应该不会引起敏感用户的不满。不过，我们也注意到了 120 Hz 的低频闪烁，振幅曲线非常平缓。从 Rigol 测量系列的第二张截图（"min."）中也可以看到这一点，其显示效果与第一张截图几乎相同。主要区别在于由于缩放的原因，"min. "图像使用了不同的缩放级别，因此振幅看起来非常平缓。120 Hz 的闪烁可能是黑帧插入 (BFI)，用于减少运动模糊。

1234
cd/m²		1231
cd/m²		1222
cd/m²
1235
cd/m²		1240
cd/m²		1241
cd/m²
1231
cd/m²		1233
cd/m²		1230
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1241 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1233 cd/m² Minimum: 2.36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1240 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67		Google Pixel 7a
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.10		Motorola Edge 40 Neo
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.40		Sony Xperia 10 V
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.10		Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67
Screen
-10%
-49%
-45%
-9%
-4%
-36%
Brightness middle
1240
1006
-19%
966
-22%
940
-24%
933
-25%
1034
-17%
1205
-3%
Brightness
1233
1010
-18%
957
-22%
935
-24%
944
-23%
1035
-16%
1177
-5%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
97
-1%
99
1%
97
-1%
96
-2%
90
-8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.1
-0%
1.87
-70%
2.4
-118%
1.1
-0%
1.1
-0%
1.51
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
2.5
-14%
4.34
-97%
3.2
-45%
1.7
23%
1.9
14%
4.07
-85%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.5
-7%
2.5
-79%
2.2
-57%
1.8
-29%
1.4
-0%
2.5
-79%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.25 98%
2.272 97%
2.05 107%
2.29 96%
2.22 99%
2.175 101%
CCT
6669 97%
6531 100%
6582 99%
6422 101%
6611 98%
6674 97%
6407 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

使用预设色彩模式 "鲜艳"时，AMOLED 面板使用 DCI-P3 色彩空间。如果切换到 "标准"，屏幕将切换到更小的 sRGB 色彩空间，但却能获得最佳画质。

色彩准确度（配置文件标准，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件标准，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件标准，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件标准，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（配置文件标准，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（配置文件标准，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件标准，目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件标准，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8285 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7885 ms rise
↘ 0.81 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在室外，视角稳定的 AMOLED 面板即使在阳光直射下也清晰可辨。您还可以通过显示设置选择阳光模式，该模式会根据强烈的阳光自动调节屏幕亮度。不过，这样做时，你必须关闭亮度传感器，而在我们的测试中，事实证明这并不是最合理的。如果手动调节亮度，显示屏的最大亮度只能达到 516 cd/m²。当我们激活阳光模式时，亮度也没有任何变化。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 -Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 配备联发科 Dimensity 7200-Ultra

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 配备了Redmi Note 系列中最强大的 SoC，即 联发科技 Dimensity 7200-Ultra.该处理器采用 4 纳米结构宽度制造，配备 2 个 ARM Cortex A715 功率内核，主频高达 2.8 GHz。第二个集群有 6 个 ARM Cortex A510 功率内核，最高主频可达 2 GHz。

从性能上看，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 让大多数 400 美元以下的中端智能手机望尘莫及。它的系统速度很高，应用程序运行速度很快，即使同时打开多个程序也不会让小米手机出汗。在我们的测试中，偶尔也会出现微小的卡顿，但总的来说，它的运行非常流畅。

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的性能不仅超过了 Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G在合成基准测试中的表现优于 13 Pro 5G，还优于类似配置的对比设备，如 摩托罗拉 Edge 40 Neo和 三星Galaxy A54.不过，Crossmark 和 PCMark forAndroid 等基准测试并不特别适合它。在性能方面，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 与 谷歌 Pixel 7a.

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.2 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1085 Points +22%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1036 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (887 - 890, n=2)
889 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
887 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
789 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
783 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
783 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
669 Points -25%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4279 Points +70%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3093 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2817 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2678 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2521 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (2177 - 2521, n=2)
2349 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
2197 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1921 Points -24%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1428 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1424 Points +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1147 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (1128 - 1147, n=2)
1138 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1029 Points -10%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
904 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
893 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4547 Points +67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points +41%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3383 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2955 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2715 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (2592 - 2715, n=2)
2654 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
2214 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2111 Points -22%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1116008 Points +66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
671775 Points
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
657414 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (580983 - 671775, n=2)
626379 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
518499 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
510541 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
507481 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
391186 Points -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
15195 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14716 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13024 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
12967 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
12313 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points -4%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
11736 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (10924 - 12313, n=2)
11619 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7933 Points -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
987 Points +44%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
934 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points +22%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
713 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
703 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (686 - 695, n=2)
691 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
686 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
597 Points -13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7122 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +11%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5751 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5192 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5056 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4666 Points -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (4115 - 5192, n=2)
4654 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
4152 Points -20%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3655 Points -30%
System
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
12177 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
10410 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
9366 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
8961 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (6734 - 9366, n=2)
8050 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7953 Points -15%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
7803 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
7550 Points -19%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7784 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5847 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
5742 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (4567 - 5847, n=2)
5207 Points -11%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5126 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4857 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4595 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4146 Points -29%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
16594 Points +60%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
15766 Points +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +37%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (10386 - 10646, n=2)
10516 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10386 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
7168 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
7108 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
5178 Points -50%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4376 Points -58%
Web
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1905 Points +49%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1734 Points +36%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1636 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1533 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
1324 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1278 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1237 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (876 - 1278, n=2)
1077 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
64597 Points +124%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
43053 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
28870 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  (26315 - 28870, n=2)
27593 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288
22528 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
8618 Points -70%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5835 Points -80%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5442 Points -81%

我们的 GPU 测试结果与合成基准测试结果相同。小米 小米 Poco X6 Pro 5G和 谷歌 Pixel 7a都比Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 更快，但反过来，我们的测试样品也击败了其他对比设备。处理器 ARM Mali-G610 MC4负责图形计算。 联发科 Dimensity 7200-Ultra.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3085 Points +157%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1832 Points +52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1202 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
788 Points -34%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
693 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
353 Points -71%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3068 Points +158%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1860 Points +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1191 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
813 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
800 Points -33%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
698 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 Points -70%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11204 Points +150%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6855 Points +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4483 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3046 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2583 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1198 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6557 Points +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4336 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3039 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2826 Points -35%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2593 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points -72%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6342 Points +65%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4267 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4227 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4053 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3852 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3833 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3512 Points -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13159 Points +81%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10121 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7275 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5455 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5129 Points -29%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4258 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2990 Points -59%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10622 Points +75%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7756 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6065 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4993 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4211 Points -31%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3092 Points -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps -18%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
90 fps -21%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
462 fps +142%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
248 fps +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
191 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
120 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
119 fps -38%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -39%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +48%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -36%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +93%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps -28%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +125%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -10%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -19%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps +133%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -29%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -33%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
32 fps -56%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +165%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -16%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -39%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +150%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -34%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -41%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps +154%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -42%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +136%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -41%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -45%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +139%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -39%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps +150%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -37%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -41%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -59%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps +153%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -39%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.3 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -62%

对于Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G，上网冲浪易如反掌。即使是较大的网站，加载速度也很快，等待时间对这款手机来说是个例外。反过来，浏览器基准测试也未能反映出这一点，因为小米手机的成绩仅低于平均水平。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
134.031 Points +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
117.292 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +27%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
104.662 Points +25%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
102.38 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
94.611 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
83.784 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (76.6 - 83.8, n=2)
80.2 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
78.167 Points -7%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
180 runs/min +61%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
125 runs/min +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
112 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (104 - 112, n=2)
108 runs/min -4%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -4%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
91.6 runs/min -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
88.2 runs/min -21%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
72 runs/min -36%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
70.5 runs/min -37%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
140 Points +63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
115 Points +34%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
111 Points +29%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
106 Points +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (86 - 125, n=2)
105.5 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
97 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
86 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
67 Points -22%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
157 Points +71%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (92 - 185, n=2)
138.5 Points +51%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
124 Points +35%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
121 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
92 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
46286 Points +18%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
44948 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
39060 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
35379 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
34140 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
33801 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
28902 Points -26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (18562 - 39060, n=2)
28811 Points -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (1296 - 1570, n=2)
1433 ms * -11%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
1388 ms * -7%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)
1299.1 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
1296.2 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
1208.8 ms * +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)
1170.6 ms * +10%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
1007.2 ms * +22%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
919.6 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

得益于 UFS-3.1 存储，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 实现了很高的数据吞吐量，可以快速加载更大的应用程序。同价位的其他智能手机很难与之匹敌。唯一的例外是 小米 Poco X6 Pro拥有 UFS-4.0 存储。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5GGoogle Pixel 7aMotorola Edge 40 NeoSamsung Galaxy A54 5GSony Xperia 10 VXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GAverage 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-18%
-58%
-55%
83%
-31%
1%
-14%
Sequential Read 256KB
1921.64
1624.39
-15%
1004.4
-48%
528.32
-73%
444.54
-77%
3824.7
99%
946.8
-51%
1877 ?(1695 - 2023, n=23)
-2%
1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years)
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
1702.4
996.44
-41%
930.9
-45%
335.39
-80%
438.02
-74%
3642.57
114%
808.2
-53%
1156 ?(575 - 1876, n=23)
-32%
1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years)
-35%
Random Read 4KB
248.21
229.44
-8%
279.5
13%
236.23
-5%
175.72
-29%
355.7
43%
239.2
-4%
281 ?(208 - 386, n=23)
13%
247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years)
0%
Random Write 4KB
265.29
263.81
-1%
284.1
7%
70.52
-73%
165.15
-38%
467.74
76%
220.5
-17%
333 ?(221 - 503, n=23)
26%
271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years)
2%

游戏 - 每秒 120 帧仍是例外

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 可以很好地运行当前的游戏。图形要求较低的《Asphalt 9》在 60fps 大关附近实现了平衡。使用HD/Extreme设置玩《PUBG Mobile》也是如此。在玩图形要求较高的《源氏冲击》时，帧速率波动较大，有时甚至低于 35fps。这已经不是非常流畅了。

至少在我们测试的游戏中，小米无法展示其 120Hz 的屏幕。至少《PUBG Mobile》为我们提供了最低图形设置下的 90fps 模式，即流畅模式。

我们使用Gamebench测试工具确定游戏帧率。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends; 4.5.1b: Ø58.9 (51-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø53.7 (49-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø43.4 (34-58)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G; PUBG Mobile; 3.0.0: Ø59.3 (56-61)

排放 - 配备立体声扬声器的Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G

温度

在使用过程中，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 保持良好的冷却状态。我们只在使用 Burnout 基准进行了一小时的压力测试后，发现温度高于体温。即便如此，42.3 °C的最高温度也不会让人感觉不舒服。3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试表明，小米智能手机几乎在所有时间都能充分发挥其性能。

Max. Load
 41.3 °C40.4 °C37.6 °C 
 42.3 °C41.9 °C40.3 °C 
 41.5 °C40.2 °C39.5 °C 
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Average: 40.6 °C
38.4 °C39.4 °C41.1 °C
38.1 °C38.2 °C39.2 °C
36.3 °C39.4 °C38.8 °C
Maximum: 41.1 °C
Average: 38.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 %
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.7 % -21%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.3 % -45%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 %
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % -33%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.6 % -39%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.2 %
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.07 (7.05-7.08)
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø8.32 (6.73-11.1)
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.17 (4.16-4.18)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.85 (4.84-4.87)
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (12-18)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.75 (4.74-4.76)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.6 (25.4-25.7)
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.2 (21.4-39.5)
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.4 (15.4-15.5)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.21 (7.2-7.22)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.4 (43.6-55.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.1 (18.1-18.2)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø17 (17-17.1)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.4 (11-16.9)

发言人

按照智能手机的标准，小米手机的立体声扬声器能产生相当均衡的音效，中高音非常线性，在最大音量时也不会失真。不过，没有低音。

可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 连接外置音频设备，以获得更好的音效。Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 支持目前几乎所有的蓝牙编解码器，包括 AAC、SBC、aptX HD、aptX TWS+ 和 LHDC V1 至 V5。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.234.52530.731.83125.626.74026.728.25036.7396324.625.78017.623.610018.731.812518.241.716015.949.120017.34925015.252.231514.156.440013.461.550013.869.263014.368.780013.774.1100012.475.3125012.774.2160012.173.1200012.975250012.574.9315012.279.4400012.881.8500013.177.4630013.579.7800013.173.81000013.772.4125001475.71600013.363.7SPL25.288.7N0.776.2median 13.5median 73.8Delta1.27.729.638.63029.724.525.225.826.737.537.925.228.120.222.920.43017.543.114.453.914.351.415.256.311.957.913.560.612.163.512.459.711.765.311.87211.475.912.376.312.276.312.178.312.27712.98013.479.813.277.712.977.913.675.213.466.113.264.924.888.70.673.3median 12.9median 720.99.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5GSamsung Galaxy A54 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 30 分钟内充满电

耗电量

虽然 Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GRedmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 使用的是 67 瓦的电源装置，而 120 瓦的电源装置则可以充分发挥其优势。在测试过程中，智能手机在关机状态下只用了 28 分钟就充满了电。

根据小米的说法，充电只需 19 分钟。然而，尽管我们激活了电池选项，如提高充电速度和加速充电，却无法亲自验证。我们最接近制造商的说法是让手机处于开机状态，并在电池电量为 1% 时将其连接到电源。然后在 24 分钟后充电。

在负载和闲置模式下，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的耗电量并不大。虽然它的基本耗电量有些高，但在最大负载时，它的运行比速度较慢的Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 要节俭得多。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.31 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.22 / 1.47 / 1.58 Watt
Load midlight 8.09 / 9.49 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 7a
4385 mAh		Motorola Edge 40 Neo
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Sony Xperia 10 V
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 7200
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
26%
19%
16%
41%
-11%
14%
3%
13%
Idle Minimum *
1.22
0.62
49%
1
18%
0.75
39%
0.56
54%
1.11
9%
1.3
-7%
1.015 ?(0.81 - 1.22, n=2)
17%
0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years)
26%
Idle Average *
1.47
0.87
41%
1.2
18%
1.51
-3%
0.91
38%
1.14
22%
1.4
5%
1.74 ?(1.47 - 2.01, n=2)
-18%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Maximum *
1.58
0.95
40%
1.3
18%
1.62
-3%
0.98
38%
1.16
27%
1.6
-1%
1.825 ?(1.58 - 2.07, n=2)
-16%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years)
-3%
Load Average *
8.09
6.11
24%
5.2
36%
4.91
39%
5.34
34%
12.33
-52%
2.5
69%
6.13 ?(4.16 - 8.09, n=2)
24%
5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years)
31%
Load Maximum *
9.49
11.81
-24%
9.2
3%
8.93
6%
5.46
42%
15.34
-62%
9.1
4%
8.7 ?(7.91 - 9.49, n=2)
8%
8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years)
12%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.81 (1.357-6.84)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.7 (1.081-12.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.95 (1.383-9.14)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.132 (1.063-1.513)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.58 (4.03-5.47)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.32 (4.08-4.55)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.132 (1.063-1.513)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

运行时间

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的运行时间不错。在模拟网上冲浪测试中的运行时间为 15:13 小时，在连续循环播放视频时的运行时间为 15:37 小时，与对比设备相比，它的续航能力稍逊一筹。三星 三星Galaxy A54和 索尼 Xperia 10 V在这两个实际测试场景中的续航时间要长得多。在 Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G的续航时间也稍长一些。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 26min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 13min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 7a
4385 mAh		Motorola Edge 40 Neo
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Sony Xperia 10 V
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
19%
26%
65%
-3%
7%
Reader / Idle
1586
1328
-16%
2444
54%
2591
63%
4067
156%
1815
14%
1786
13%
H.264
937
1224
31%
1232
31%
1508
61%
1615
72%
967
3%
1142
22%
WiFi v1.3
913
821
-10%
864
-5%
941
3%
1157
27%
942
3%
1002
10%
Load
373
252
-32%
355
-5%
284
-24%
388
4%
251
-33%
307
-18%

Pros

+ 明亮的 120 赫兹 AMOLED 面板
+ 性能卓越
+ 高品质的构造和玻璃后壳
+ IP68 防尘防水保护
+ 蓝牙 5.3、WiFi 6，支持 eSIM 卡
+ 同价位主摄像头性能良好
+ 良好的电池续航能力
+ 良好的立体声扬声器

Cons

- 带有大量臃肿软件的 MIUI
- 没有 microSD 插槽
- 没有真正的全时显示屏
- 无 3.5 毫米音频插孔
- 无无线充电
- 只有 USB 2.0

关于小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的评价

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 评测。测试设备由德国小米公司提供。
小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 评测。测试设备由德国小米公司提供。

虽然 小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G在我们的测试中表现几乎完美无瑕，而Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 现在则将标准定得更高。

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 拥有丰富的硬件配置，现售价约为 480 美元。其亮点包括 联发科 Dimensity 7200-Ultra它不仅拥有令人印象深刻的数据，而且目前还被列为市场上最好的中端智能手机。

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 是一款功能强大的中端智能手机。特别是，它拥有快速 SoC、200 百万像素摄像头和明亮的 AMOLED 面板。

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的亮丽 AMOLED 面板、良好的立体声扬声器和令人印象深刻的运行时间更值得称赞。我们的测试样品与Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 相比，尤其是它的 SoC 功能更强大，尽管摄像头设置相同，但它的拍照效果更好。红米笔记本独有的功能还包括曲面显示屏、WiFi 6、IP68 认证、快速存储和 120 瓦充电。

遗憾的是，真正的永远在线显示屏、USB-C 3.x 和无线充电都是小米为其价格更高的 13 和 14 系列机型保留的功能。同样令人遗憾的是，小米在其顶级机型Redmi Note 上取消了 3.5 毫米音频插孔，但在Redmi Note 系列的其他机型上却没有。我们也不喜欢预装在 MIUI-ROM 中的臃肿软件和集成在某些小米应用程序中的广告。

除了Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G，Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 的替代产品还包括 谷歌 Pixel 7a它比我们的测试设备稍快一些。还有 三星Galaxy A54，它的更新周期也比Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 更长。

价格和供应情况

Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 版存储容量为 512 GB，目前在亚马逊上的售价为477.99 美元。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G - 03/18/2024 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
94%
Games Performance
58 / 64 → 91%
Application Performance
82 / 86 → 95%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
75%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 评测--新的中端顶级产品？
Manuel Masiero, 2024-03-20 (Update: 2024-03-20)