Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 智能手机评测--一款拥有令人印象深刻的显示屏、售价约 200 美元的手机

旧貌换新颜 红米-Note-13 系列中最便宜的机型继续采用明亮的 120Hz AMOLED 显示屏,除此之外,它还拥有不错的功能,售价约为 200 美元。然而,竞争在不断加剧。最新款的中端经典机型还能跟得上吗?
Android ARM Smartphone
小米Redmi Note 13 4G| 照片:Florian Schmitt

不是每个人都需要 5G,不是每个应用都要求你的智能手机采用高端 SoC,也不是每个用户都带着手机在全球各地旅行,需要随时随地上网。这种要求不高的目标市场(同时也关注价格)正是小米Redmi Note 13 4G 等手机存在的原因。在本次评测中,我们将对这款机型进行更深入的了解。

它不仅拥有 LTE 作为最快的蜂窝网络,而且配备了典型的中端处理器,足以满足发送短信、使用社交媒体和观看视频的需求,此外,它的售价约为 200 美元,在网上有时甚至可以买到更便宜的产品。

不过,其他制造商也推出了许多物美价廉的中端设备,其中许多都有自己独特的优势。那么,让我们看看小米Redmi Note 13 4G 是否能在同价位产品中脱颖而出。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Redmi Note 13 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G 8 x 1.9 - 2.8 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 100 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD (shared), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 162.2 x 75.6
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.75, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, silicone bumper, headset, 24 Months Warranty, IP54-certified, fanless
Weight
188.5 g
Price
199 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
80.2 %
02/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610
188.5 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80.1 %
05/2023
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
SD 685, Adreno 610
188 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
75.9 %
07/2023
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
201 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
78.7 %
05/2023
Nokia G22
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
195 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.52"1600x720
80.7 %
10/2023
Motorola Moto G54
Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256
177 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.50"2400x1080

说到手机壳,小米确实下了一番功夫。它现在采用了全新的设计,尤其是在背面:虽然它仍然由塑料制成,但现在采用了缎面处理。在欧洲,你可以买到黑色、浅蓝色和浅绿色,而在其他地区,你也可以买到橙色渐变的浅色配色。

摄像头现在被单独放置,从视觉上看,它们不再组合成一个单一的摄像头模块。背面的透视盖做工精良,边框过渡均匀,但对指纹痕迹的收集相当敏感。

与前代机型相比,正面也有一些变化。 小米Redmi Note 12 4G:更细的边框,尤其是显示屏底部边缘的边框,使设计更现代,在屏幕直径相同的情况下,尺寸略小。前置摄像头直接嵌入屏幕,采用冲孔设计。

手机壳相当稳定,只有在中高压力下扭动手机时才会发出一些嘎吱嘎吱的声音。它具有 IP54 级防尘防水保护。这意味着异物几乎无法穿透外壳,溅水对设备来说也不成问题。另一方面,您不应该带着手机去潜水。

小米Redmi Note 13 4G| 照片:Florian Schmitt
小米Redmi Note 13 4G| 照片:Florian Schmitt
小米Redmi Note 13 4G| 照片:Florian Schmitt
小米Redmi Note 13 4G| 照片:Florian Schmitt
小米Redmi Note 13 4G| 照片:Florian Schmitt

尺寸比较

167.7 mm 78 mm 9.1 mm 201 g165.9 mm 76.2 mm 8 mm 188 g165 mm 76.2 mm 8.5 mm 195 g162.2 mm 75.6 mm 8 mm 188.5 g161.6 mm 73.8 mm 8 mm 177 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 包括红外触发器

这款智能手机目前有三种不同的存储版本:

  • 6 GB 内存 / 128 GB 存储空间
  • 8 GB 内存 / 128 GB 存储空间
  • 8 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间

在这个性能级别的手机中,多 2GB 内存是否真的值得还存在一些疑问。不过,如果您拍摄大量照片、喜欢录制视频或希望在长途旅行中下载流媒体内容,那么更多的数据存储空间实际上是非常有用的。

与许多小米手机一样,这款手机也配备了红外发射器,可以将手机变成电视、蓝光播放器和其他设备的遥控器。手机还有一个 3.5 毫米音频接口,这意味着你可以轻松使用老式耳机,而无需使用适配器。手机还配备了用于非接触式支付方式(如谷歌支付)的 NFC 功能。

卡舱内有两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽。其中一个还可以容纳一张 microSD 卡来扩展手机存储空间,这意味着你必须选择使用第二张 SIM 卡还是 microSD 卡。它不支持 eSIM 卡。

顶部:3.5 毫米音频插孔、扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风
顶部:3.5 毫米音频插孔、扬声器、红外爆破器、麦克风
底部:扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 接口、SIM 卡插槽
底部:扬声器、麦克风、USB-C 接口、SIM 卡插槽
右:音量摇杆、待机键
右:音量摇杆、待机键
左:无连接
左:无连接

microSD 读卡器

在我们使用参考卡(Angelbird V60)进行的测试中,手机读卡器的速度并不是很快,与前代产品差不多。这个价位的读卡器速度要快得多。因此,您应该将常用数据留在设备的内部存储空间中,但 SD 卡绝对可以很好地用作存档。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
50 MB/s +106%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)
36.2 MB/s +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
23.6 MB/s -3%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.6 MB/s -19%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø26.5 (17.2-40)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.3 (27.4-50)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø34.3 (26.7-47.7)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.6 (30.1-45.4)
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.3 (21.6-47.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (18.4-82.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (28-82.5)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.3 (37-79.3)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (39-81.8)
Motorola Moto G54 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.9 (29.9-78.1)

软件 - 稍微更新,但有许多臃肿的软件

小米已将这款手机的软件命名为 MIUI 14,但它仍基于Android 13。制造商没有说明该智能手机系列将在多长时间内接受更新,也没有说明安全补丁的发布频率。在测试时,最新的补丁是从 2023 年 12 月开始的,因此它仍然是最新的。

看到小米在自己的应用程序中加入了如此多的广告,这让人很不爽。你也许可以停用这些功能,但对许多用户来说,停用功能的选项隐藏得很好。这款手机还预装了许多臃肿的软件,如果你想要一个干净的系统,首先必须删除这些软件。

软件 小米Redmi Note 13 4G
软件 小米Redmi Note 13 4G
软件 小米Redmi Note 13 4G

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 没有 5G 但有良好的定位服务

正如它的名字所示,小米Redmi Note 13 4G 并不是一款 5G 智能手机。相反,它只能使用 LTE 作为最快的蜂窝标准。它也不支持所有频率,这意味着在长途旅行中尝试通过 LTE 上网时可能会遇到一些问题。

在我们的测试期间,随机样本显示该设备的移动数据接收效果基本良好,但与更昂贵的智能手机相比,还不在同一水平线上。

WiFi 5 是小米手机掌握的最快的无线局域网标准。这使它与同价位的设备处于同一水平,并实现了该标准应有的相当稳定的速率:在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 作为参考路由器进行的测试中,我们测得的速度在 300 到 380 MBit/s 之间。

在靠近路由器的地方,信号强度很强,但有时网站仍需要一段时间才能完全加载。在距离路由器 10 米、中间有 3 面墙的情况下,信号强度约为 3/4,网页加载时间稍长。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
317 (min: 293) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 336) MBit/s ∼53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
286 (min: 267) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
325 (min: 290) MBit/s ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
iperf3 receive AXE11000
337 (min: 68) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
365 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼53%
Nokia G22
iperf3 receive AXE11000
315 (min: 226) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
362 (min: 319) MBit/s ∼53%
Motorola Moto G54
iperf3 receive AXE11000
365 (min: 347) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
306 (min: 277) MBit/s ∼45%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
646 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
685 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø316 (293-339)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø364 (336-382)
外部 GPS 测试
外部 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

小米手机可以接入所有大型卫星网络进行定位。如果你走出家门,只需几秒钟,就能以 3 米的精度对你进行定位。这是该价位手机的标准值,可以确保相当高的精确度。

当然,我们也想看看在实际使用中是否如此,因此我们带着手机进行了一次自行车旅行。我们用 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比设备,因为它拥有相当精确的定位功能。

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 在一些地方出现了轻微的误差,但总体而言问题不大。因此,我们推荐您使用这款智能手机进行导航,除非您需要绝对的精确度。

Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接
小米Redmi Note 13 4G 定位服务 - 概述
小米Redmi Note 13 4G 定位服务 - 概述
小米Redmi Note 13 4G 定位服务 - 转折点
小米Redmi Note 13 4G 定位服务 - 转折点
小米Redmi Note 13 4G 定位服务 - 桥接
小米Redmi Note 13 4G 定位服务 - 桥接

电话功能和通话质量 - 远距离通话

小米在这款智能手机上使用了谷歌的电话应用程序。很多其他Android 用户对此应该不会感到陌生。

将手机贴在耳边时,通话听起来会有点距离感,但只要我们说话的声音不是太小,电话另一端的人就能很好地理解我们的意思。不过,麦克风并不能完全清晰地传递我们的声音。

如果使用免提麦克风和手机扬声器进行通话,声音也不那么清晰,但还是可以很容易地听懂。Redmi Note 13 的用户在使用这种模式时,说话声音也不要太小。

相机 - 照片质量尚可

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 的主摄像头有 1.08 亿像素,听起来似乎很多,但实际上它大多只能拍摄 1200 万像素的照片。这意味着相机将 9 个像素合成一个像素,以吸收更多光线。

拍摄出来的照片可以显示更多的对比度和细节,但在光线充足的条件下,这些照片一般都很不错。我们也很喜欢将非常暗的区域变亮的效果--在这里,照片的亮部不会占主导地位,暗部仍能显示出一些细节。

手机主摄像头的视频录制速度最高可达 1080p 和 30fps。在 摩托罗拉 Moto G54已经可以以每秒 60 帧的速度录制视频,但除此以外,小米手机的视频录制速度在同类产品中处于中等水平。它的自动对焦不是最快的,但光照调整速度相当快。

这款智能手机还配备了 800 万像素超广角镜头。使用该镜头拍摄的照片是不错的快照,但总的来说,照片颗粒感很强,细节很少。此外,该手机还配备了一个 200 万像素的微距镜头,但由于分辨率相对较低,其照片并不是最吸引人的。

该手机的前置摄像头分辨率为 1600 万像素,在光线良好的情况下,自拍效果很好,在较暗的地方仍能显示出一些细节,总体而言细节层次不错。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightWide-angle camera

我们还在照相实验室测试了主相机,在那里,我们可以更好地比较相机在固定照明条件下和固定拍摄对象下的性能。在照度为 1 lux 的条件下,相机很难识别细节,所拍摄的图像大多是黑色的。

在全棚照明下,你可以看到照片上有明显的蓝色色调,清晰度和对比度也有所下降。不过,总的来说,对于一款经济实惠的中端手机来说,这些结果还算正常。

ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G: 6.99 ∆E min: 0.96 - max: 14.29 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
44 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G: 47.01 ∆E min: 13.99 - max: 93.69 ∆E

配件和保修 - Lush 套装

手机附带了很多配件:除了充电器和相应的 USB 数据线外,还有一个硅胶防撞器,甚至还有一个带数据线的耳机。虽然它的质量不是最好的,但对于偶尔的通话来说已经足够了。

在网上,制造商并没有专门为这款产品提供任何其他配件。不过,由于它是一款相当受欢迎的机型,你可能会从第三方供应商那里找到大量的外壳和配件。

在欧洲(我们进行测试的地方),制造商为这款手机提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 快速触摸屏

手机触摸屏的触摸扫描速度高达每秒 240 次,因此可以非常快速地进行操作。触摸屏的边边角角都非常可靠。如果你只有一只手空闲,也可以通过从中间向左滑动切换到单手模式。这样屏幕就会缩小,让你更容易触及所有区域。

设备右侧的硬件按键非常合适,触感不错,但仍然很容易找到。指纹传感器位于屏幕后方,在待机状态或显示锁屏时,抬起手机就会出现相应的标记。解锁需要一秒钟,但效果可靠。

面部识别功能同样可靠,但它并不那么安全--小米也在警告中指出了这一点:该系统可以使用面具或照片进行覆盖,因为它只是一个 2D 面部识别软件。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 高一个等级

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

显示屏一直是Redmi Note 系列的一大亮点。小米采用高品质的 AMOLED 显示屏,具有帧速率快、最大亮度高等特点。Redmi Note 13 4G 也是如此:它采用 120Hz 面板,在显示全白时亮度高达 940 cd/m²。当显示小面积白色时,亮度会更高。

在这个价位的竞争产品中,小米的亮度通常足以满足日常使用,但却无法提供漂亮的 HDR 内容。Redmi Note 13 4G 在这方面做得更好。

在 "标准 "模式下,它的色彩还原也非常出色:我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行了测试,结果显示灰度描绘准确,色彩偏差很小。 因此,该模式也可用于专业色彩工作。

915
cd/m²
927
cd/m²
932
cd/m²
900
cd/m²
940
cd/m²
923
cd/m²
918
cd/m²
919
cd/m²
928
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 940 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 922.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 940 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Nokia G22
IPS, 1600x720, 6.52
Motorola Moto G54
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
-22%
-342%
-137%
-118%
Brightness middle
940
650
-31%
465
-51%
674
-28%
492
-48%
Brightness
922
658
-29%
439
-52%
641
-30%
470
-49%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
89
-7%
90
-6%
90
-6%
Black Level *
0.47
0.43
0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.55
-29%
8.5
-608%
4.45
-271%
3.9
-225%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.28
2.59
-14%
15.8
-593%
7.41
-225%
6.26
-175%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
1.8
-29%
11.8
-743%
5.1
-264%
4.3
-207%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.194 100%
2.2 100%
2.072 106%
2.275 97%
CCT
6503 100%
6316 103%
10757 60%
7799 83%
7656 85%
Contrast
989
1567
1640

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 389.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 389.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 389.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

我们注意到,在低亮度下,闪烁频率高达 389 Hz。因此,我们建议敏感用户在购买前试用一下这款手机,以确保长时间使用不会出现任何问题。

这款手机的响应时间较短,适合要求较高的用户使用。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
卡尔曼 DCI P3
卡尔曼 DCI P3
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 1.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

屏幕的可视角度极佳,即使从平面角度观看,画面也依然清晰。在室外,显示屏真正展现了它的优势,在明亮的环境中依然清晰可辨。

视角| 照片:Florian Schmitt
视角
户外使用| 照片:Florian Schmitt
室外使用

绩效 - 有时需要等待时间

与前代机型一样,今年的小米手机也采用了 高通骁龙 685作为 SoC。这款智能手机的动力源泉早在三年多前就已问世,但它采用的是高能效的 6 纳米工艺,其性能应该足以满足日常使用需求。但事实真的如此吗?

当然,我们通过基准测试对其进行了客观测试,并就测试期间手机的表现加入了我们的主观意见。

总的来说,该系统在同价位手机中表现一般:它既没有超强的性能,也没有特别慢的速度。在日常使用中,你偶尔会发现这并不是一个完全流畅的系统。不过,在大多数情况下,你可以快速浏览应用程序,只是加载时间较短。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)
911 Points +108%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
697 Points +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
442 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (437 - 442, n=2)
440 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
437 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
350 Points -20%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
310 Points -29%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)
2988 Points +68%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1903 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (1775 - 1787, n=2)
1781 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1775 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1334 Points -25%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1318 Points -26%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)
1390 Points +191%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
916 Points +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
478 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  ()
478 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
413 Points -14%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)
3840 Points +149%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2315 Points +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1544 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  ()
1544 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1384 Points -10%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points +146%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
436096 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
300122 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (289659 - 300122, n=2)
294891 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
289659 Points -3%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
13268 Points +82%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11771 Points +61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9421 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (7305 - 9421, n=2)
8363 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
7305 Points
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6637 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5720 Points -22%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points +127%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
628 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
454 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (369 - 454, n=2)
412 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
369 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
348 Points -6%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points +111%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3773 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2737 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (2728 - 2737, n=2)
2733 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2728 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2226 Points -18%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points +53%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6911 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
6320 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (6155 - 6320, n=2)
6238 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6155 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5104 Points -19%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points +91%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5004 Points +52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3285 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (3254 - 3285, n=2)
3270 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3254 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2650 Points -19%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points +510%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4200 Points +80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2334 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (2331 - 2334, n=2)
2333 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2331 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1811 Points -22%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points +31%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1394 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1232 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (1144 - 1232, n=2)
1188 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1144 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1002 Points -12%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +373%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
6014 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
4615 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (4445 - 4615, n=2)
4530 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4445 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3630 Points -21%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points +4568%
Motorola Moto G54
MediaTek Dimensity 7020, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
865 Points +126%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
780 Points +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
382 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
  (365 - 382, n=2)
374 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
365 Points -4%

在全高清屏幕的原生分辨率下,简单的图形计算也能流畅进行。另一方面,你也不应该对该系统抱有更高的期望,因为在 GFXBench 测试中,当描绘稍微现代一点的图形时,帧率很快就降到了 30 fps 以下。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
141 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
135 Points
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
112 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
139 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
135 Points -3%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
114 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
716 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 Points
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
413 Points -35%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
706 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
646 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
645 Points
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
408 Points -37%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3069 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2589 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2410 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2321 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2948 Points +113%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1383 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1343 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points -18%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2974 Points +96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1545 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1519 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1290 Points -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3524 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2739 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2694 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2676 Points -2%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2397 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1436 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1427 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1178 Points -17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
2580 Points +62%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1597 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1558 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1346 Points -16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
69 fps +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps -7%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
74 fps +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps -9%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
57 fps +159%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
62 fps +158%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps -4%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
33 fps +136%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
35 fps +119%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -6%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.7 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
18 fps +134%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.3 fps +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.7 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.6 fps -1%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps +116%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.2 fps -41%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
11 fps +100%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.4 fps +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.8 fps -13%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
7.1 fps +97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -11%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
19 fps +100%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.2 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
20 fps +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10.1 fps +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -15%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -45%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
3 fps +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps -7%
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
0.85 fps -43%

大型网站可能需要一段时间才能显示在屏幕上。滚动时,有时可能还需要等待内容加载。图片的加载时间尤其长。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points +70%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
85.936 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
62.375 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (58.9 - 62.4, n=2)
60.7 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
58.945 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
40.02 Points -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +104%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
76.5 runs/min +46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
52.4 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (50.9 - 52.4, n=2)
51.7 runs/min -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
50.9 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
32 runs/min -39%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points +104%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
97 Points +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
58 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (49 - 58, n=2)
53.5 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
49 Points
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
44 Points -10%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)
33357 Points +110%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
28919 Points +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
15900 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (15695 - 15900, n=2)
15798 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
15695 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
11782 Points -26%
Nokia G22 (Chrome 112)
10858 Points -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE (Chrome 114)
3347 ms * -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (2535 - 2535, n=2)
2535 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
2534.6 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)
2534.5 ms * -0%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +37%
Motorola Moto G54 (Chrome 118.0.5993.80)
1399.8 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

快速 UFS-2.2 现在也已成为这个相对便宜的价格区间的标准配置,而Redmi Note 13 4G 也不甘落后。因此,它在我们的存储测试中取得了同类产品的平均成绩,尽管其 PCMark 测试结果稍慢一些。

在实际使用中,当运行要求较高的应用程序时,加载时间尚可忍受,而复制过程则略快。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GSamsung Galaxy A14 LTENokia G22Motorola Moto G54Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
18%
-69%
-23%
18%
-13%
52%
Sequential Read 256KB
909.8
954.87
5%
298.69
-67%
881
-3%
983.01
8%
Sequential Write 256KB
606.3
709.51
17%
200.17
-67%
367
-39%
817.55
35%
Random Read 4KB
177.1
261.09
47%
55.9
-68%
131
-26%
232.74
31%
Random Write 4KB
228
231.57
2%
55.86
-75%
172
-25%
224.58
-1%
180.6 ?(62.6 - 419, n=62)
-21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 12 4GMotorola Moto G54Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
41%
66%
9%
128%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
586 ?(3.0.4061)
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
436 ?(3.0.4061)
Storage 2.0 random read int.
30.8 ?(3.0.4061)
Storage 2.0 random write int.
22.2 ?(3.0.4061)
Storage 2.0
16582 ?(3.0.4061)
23439
41%
27461
66%

游戏 - 更像一个游戏怪人

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 绝不是一款经典的游戏手机:在最低图形设置下,《PUBG Mobile》的运行帧数稳定在 30fps。最高设置为 "平衡",帧数为 25fps。

只有《源氏冲击》可以让你在极低的设置下选择 40fps,但系统无法长时间保持这种帧率。我们使用GameBench 软件套件进行的测试显示,在高设置下,您只能获得 15fps 的速度。显示。

通过触摸屏和位置传感器控制游戏的效果非常稳定。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
051015202530354045Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø37.3 (25-49)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.4.0_20481013_20559831: Ø14.2 (12-18)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.0.0: Ø29.8 (27-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 3.0.0: Ø24.8 (23-26)

排放 - 小米手机不会太热

温度

在较长时间的负载情况下,我们在正面测得的最高温度为 41.2 °C。你可以感觉到这种热量,但不会感到不舒服。

手机的性能也几乎没有受到这些温度的影响,在运行 20 次 3DMark Wild Life 之后,它仍然保持在类似的水平上。

Max. Load
 41.2 °C32 °C29.5 °C 
 40.5 °C32 °C29 °C 
 39 °C32.1 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 41.2 °C
Average: 33.9 °C
28.9 °C33.3 °C36.4 °C
29.2 °C33.4 °C39.3 °C
30.5 °C33.3 °C36.7 °C
Maximum: 39.3 °C
Average: 33.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
Nokia G22
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96.8 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
96.4 % -3%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
% -100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 %
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
95.6 % -3%
Motorola Moto G54
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7020, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
% -100%
00.20.40.60.91.11.31.51.71.92.22.42.62.833.23.43.73.94.1Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.814 (0.81-0.82)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.813 (0.807-0.816)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.91 (3.89-3.93)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.9 (3.89-3.91)
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.29 (4.15-4.31)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.5 (2.44-2.52)
正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

手机底部和顶部各有一个扬声器,因此水平放置时也能产生立体声效果。在音量方面,这款手机的音量值一般,足以让一个小房间充满声音。

声音高音偏重,中低音则明显下降,总体印象令人失望。声音和人声很容易听到,但听起来相当遥远。

通过 3.5 毫米接口或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器可以获得更好的音效。这在使用上没有任何问题,现代 HiRes 编解码器(如 aptX HD 或 LHDC)也可用于无线音频传输。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.238.52530.332.93124.123.84031.429.15037.334.66325.928.58019.520.110016.52712513.731.116013.736.22009.2362508.337.13156.742.4400749.15008.854.86308.358.18008.964.6100010.765.712508.767.116009.164.920009.765.7250010.661.8315011.353.240001260.2500012.961.3630013.768.6800014.467.61000015.360.3125001657.9160001757.4SPL23.976.2N0.535.7median 10.7median 58.1Delta2.711.640.845.83737.331.728.432.533.136.43628.92724.420.523.721.224.129.720.137.613.640.212.646.912.75011.254.313.562.314.766.31466.413.672.112.670.31169.610.867.211.567.913.865.71567.815.667.416.265.817.263.117.866.517.160.717.85726.779.70.845.5median 14median 65.72.49.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GMotorola Moto G54
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G54 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 适合日常使用

耗电量

我们使用 Metrahit 测量仪测量了手机在充满电并插入墙壁插座时的耗电量,结果发现:Redmi Note 13 4G 在最极端的情况下耗电量会增加,一方面是在低负载时,另一方面是在最大负载时。特别是在运行要求非常高的应用程序时,手机需要的功率高达 7.8 瓦。

智能手机的充电功率可达 33 瓦。这意味着电池充满电需要大约 2 个小时。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.3 / 1.5 Watt
Load midlight 3.6 / 7.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G54
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
6%
-22%
12%
3%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.8
27%
0.89
19%
0.9
18%
0.95 ?(0.8 - 1.1, n=2)
14%
Idle Average *
1.3
1
23%
2.31
-78%
1.2
8%
1.15 ?(1 - 1.3, n=2)
12%
Idle Maximum *
1.5
1.5
-0%
2.34
-56%
1.5
-0%
1.5 ?(1.5 - 1.5, n=2)
-0%
Load Average *
3.6
4.8
-33%
4.11
-14%
3.3
8%
4.2 ?(3.6 - 4.8, n=2)
-17%
Load Maximum *
7.8
6.7
14%
6.46
17%
5.6
28%
7.25 ?(6.7 - 7.8, n=2)
7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.73 (1.11-7.79)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.71.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.34.5Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.36 (3.15-4.73)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)

运行时间

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 的电池容量为 5,000 毫安时,与同价位的大多数其他设备完全相同。

在我们的 WLAN 测试(模拟在屏幕亮度适中的情况下上网)中,我们测得的续航时间较短,仅为 12:22 小时。不过,它在播放内置存储器中的电影时的续航能力还是相当不错的。在高负载的情况下,你也可以工作长达 5:34 小时,尽管如前所述,在这种情况下它的性能并不高。

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 的电池应该可以满足日常使用。不过,根据您的个人使用习惯,有一些同价位的手机可以提供更长的续航时间。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 9min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
22h 38min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 34min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A14 LTE
5000 mAh
Nokia G22
5050 mAh
Motorola Moto G54
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
-5%
42%
29%
Reader / Idle
1509
1512
0%
1170
-22%
3481
131%
H.264
1358
1402
3%
1044
-23%
1041
-23%
WiFi v1.3
742
719
-3%
896
21%
1052
42%
875
18%
Load
334
327
-2%
348
4%
301
-10%

Pros

+ 纤薄边框的现代机壳
+ 良好的连接选项
+ 相当精确的定位服务
+ 不错的照片质量
+ 明亮的 120-Hz OLED 显示屏
+ 发热量不大
+ 随设备附带大量配件

Cons

- 游戏性能低
- 无 5G
- LTE 频率少
- 明显的 PWM 闪烁
- 软件有广告
- ......更新交付不明确

评价 - 屏幕是亮点

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 评测
小米Redmi Note 13 4G 评测

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 是一款价格低廉的中端手机,设计时尚,屏幕特别明亮,色彩准确,是这款手机的最大亮点。

在大多数其他类别中,该制造商的表现仍属一般,因此它不会受到任何指责,但也不会设立任何新的标准。它的摄像头能拍出不错的照片,定位服务也相当精确。

我们喜欢这款手机随附的丰富配件,以及包括红外接口和 NFC 在内的强大连接功能。我们不太喜欢它的软件,因为里面有很多预装的应用程序和制造商自己程序的广告。它没有 5G 功能,而且可用的 LTE 频率也不多,这意味着它可能并不适合在旅行中随身携带。

此外,我们还测出了明显的显示屏闪烁现象,这可能会让你的眼睛感到疲劳,给敏感用户带来困扰。竞争对手也表明,200 美元的设备可以提供更高的性能,尤其是在玩游戏时,你不得不在Redmi Note 13 4G 的设置中做出一些妥协。

小米Redmi Note 13 4G 是一款价格在 200 美元左右的可靠手机,设计时尚,屏幕质量很高。

摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Moto G54性能更强,而且还具有 5G 功能,售价约为 200 美元。您还可以在 三星Galaxy A14 LTE但它没有 OLED 屏幕。此外,它的前代产品 小米Redmi Note 12 4G这两款手机之间的差异并不大。

价格和供应情况

目前,小米Redmi Note 13 4G 在亚马逊上的售价为 219.69 美元。该机型配备 256 GB 存储空间和 8 GB 内存。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G - 02/12/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 68%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
16 / 64 → 25%
Application Performance
70 / 86 → 82%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
61%
Average
75%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 13 4G 智能手机评测--一款拥有令人印象深刻的显示屏、售价约 200 美元的手机
Florian Schmitt, 2024-02-15 (Update: 2024-02-15)