Notebookcheck Logo

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 评测--功能强大的Android 智能手机，7 年一更新

令人印象深刻的人工智能

今年，谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 在很多地方都有所改进，尤其是对摄像头进行了全面优化。不过，这款智能手机的众多新人工智能功能和七年的更新保证才是秘密亮点。请在我们的测试中了解一切。
5G Android Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 是 Pixel 7 Pro 的直接后续机型。 像素 7 Pro的直接继承者，只是在设计上进行了温和的更新。由于采用了新的芯片组 张力 G3使用，谷歌在摄像头方面进行了一些有力的改进，尤其是超广角镜头，现在可以提供高达 4800 万像素。

存储设备也得到了改进，Pixel 8 Pro 现在在德国提供高达 512 GB 的存储空间。目前，在美国甚至还有 1TB 版本，售价约为 1400 美元。遗憾的是，谷歌也大幅提高了价格：

Pixel 8 Pro Pixel 7 Pro 差价
128 GB 1,099 欧元 (~$1,175) 899 欧元 (~$962) +200 欧元 (~$214, +22.25%)
256 GB 1,159 欧元 (~$1,240) 999 欧元 (~$1,068) +160 欧元 (~$171, +16.02%)
512 GB 1,299 欧元（~1,389 美元） - -

凭借这些价格，谷歌正在接近竞争对手的旗舰产品，如 Galaxy S23 Ultra、Honor Magic5 Pro或小米 13 Pro.另一方面，Pixel 8 Pro 也是首款提供 7 年更新保证的Android 智能手机。那么，它毕竟划算吗？

Google Pixel 8 Pro (Pixel 8 Series)
Processor
Google Tensor G3 9 x 1.7 - 2.9 GHz, Zuma - Cortex X3 / A715 / A510
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G715 MP7, Core: 890 MHz
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2992 x 1344 pixel 490 PPI, capacitive, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 114 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, ambient light, gyroscope, magnetometer, barometer, temperature, accelerometer, OTG, UWB
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 162.6 x 76.5
Battery
19.64 Wh, 5050 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.89 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (1/1.31", 1.2 µm, 82°, f/1.68, Octa-PD, OIS) + 48 MP (ultrawide, 0.8 µm, 125,5°, f/1.95, Quad-PD, AF) + 48 MP (5x opt. zoom, 0.7 µm, 21.8°, f/2.8, quad-PD, OIS), Camera2 API Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 10.5 MPix (1.22 µm, f/2.2, AF)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, SIM tool, OTG adapter, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, IP68, DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Gonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a), QZSS, NavIC (L5); Bluetooth audio codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, Opus, LC3; Head SAR: 0.84 W/kg, Body SAR: 1.20 W/kg; HDR standards: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, fanless, waterproof
Weight
213 g
Price
1099 Euro
Links
Google homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
89 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
88.1 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11		206 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"2712x1220
91.1 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU		221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
91.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		233 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3080x1440
90.1 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Honor Magic5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		219 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.81"2848x1312

外壳 - Pixel 8 Pro 采用磨砂玻璃外壳

虽然谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 的机身变得更加小巧，但重量却增加了 1 克（约 0.035 盎司）。虽然厚度只有 8.8 毫米（约 0.346 英寸），但它比 像素 7 Pro8 Pro 的厚度为 8.9 毫米（约合 0.35 英寸），但如果加上摄像头，8 Pro 的厚度会比上一代产品更厚，达到 12 毫米（约合 0.47 英寸）。

机身背面采用抛光铝合金和哑光康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 的组合，给人一种非常优雅和高品质的感觉。材料之间的缝隙紧密均匀，做工也给人留下了干净利落的印象。谷歌智能手机经受住了各种翘曲的尝试，却不会发出任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。

Pixel 8 Pro 通过了 IP68 防尘防水认证。它有 "Bay"（亮蓝色）、"Obsidian"（黑色）和 "Porcelain"（米色）三种颜色可供选择，我们的测试机是后一种版本。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
163.4 mm 78.1 mm 8.9 mm 233 g162.9 mm 76.6 mm 8.9 mm 212 g162.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.77 mm 219 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g162.2 mm 75.7 mm 8.62 mm 206 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 配备 USB 3.2 和 UWB 的 Google 智能手机

谷歌没有给出 Pixel 8 Pro USB-3.2 端口的详细规格。拷贝测试中 103.73 MB/s 的传输速度表明，这可能是 USB 3.2（Gen.1），尽管其实现速度相对较慢。 此外，还不支持有线显示输出。连接的存储设备可以格式化为 FAT32 或 exFAT。

此外，还支持蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和 UWB。虽然支持始终开启的显示功能，但默认情况下该功能处于停用状态。

上图：毫米波天线槽、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部：毫米波天线槽、麦克风
左：SIM 卡插槽（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左：SIM 卡插槽
右图：功率、体积（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
右：功率、音量
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风

软件 - Pixel 8 系列获得 7 年更新

Pixel 8 Pro 随Android 14 提供，并将获得七年的安全补丁和版本更新--非常出色！

Pixel 8 Pro 还带来了一些由机器学习算法或人工智能支持的创新技术。其中包括 Magic Editor、AI Wallpaper、Video Boost 和 Audio Magic Eraser。新的夜视视频功能将在稍后加入，它将把黑暗中录制的视频提升到一个新的水平。这一切都要归功于谷歌人工智能。但唯一的缺点是，这些功能并不是在智能手机上实现的，而是在云端计算的（我们曾报道过）。我们报道).这也适用于 GBoard 校对，目前只适用于英语。

不过，其他既定功能，如神奇橡皮擦或 GBoard 智能回复，都是直接在智能手机上实现的。没有来自第三方供应商的预装软件。

如果没有互联网连接，则无法使用 AI 壁纸。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 良好的定位和宽频带支持

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 支持 Wi-Fi 7，包括 6 GHz WLAN。与我们的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器配合使用，它能达到非常高且稳定的传输速度。

移动通信连接充其量只能使用 5G Sub6，而毫米波仍是美国市场的专利。在城市环境中，接收性能良好，没有任何抱怨的理由。凭借其广泛的频段支持，Pixel 智能手机在世界任何国家都能获得良好的接收效果。

Networking
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼84%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 948) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
988 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1857 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1686 (min: 1654) MBit/s ∼97%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1496 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1671 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1754 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1504 (min: 1343) MBit/s ∼86%
Honor Magic5 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1531 (min: 1445) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1474 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼88%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
945 (min: 917) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1645 (min: 1586) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1743 (min: 1585) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
705 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
720 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1437 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1367 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼78%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1469 (1069-1581)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1754 (1618-1808)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1467 (1304-1676)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1504 (1343-1604)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø896 (870-916)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1496 (1387-1627)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (333-944)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (801-1815)
GPS 测试：室内
室内
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动

Pixel 8 Pro 掌握双频全球导航卫星系统，支持所有全球卫星导航系统和 NavIC。因此，它能够在室外快速、准确地确定位置。在室内，几乎不需要更长的时间，准确度仍然很高。

我们比较了谷歌智能手机和 Garmin Venu 2 在长途步行中的定位能力。两款设备确定的路线总长度仅相差 10 米（约 33 英尺）。在公园里，两款设备在确定位置时都遇到了一些问题，因为公园里有很多树挡住了它们，而智能手表在这方面做得更好。不过，Pixel 在道路上的表现也不错。

全球导航卫星系统测试：在路上
全球导航卫星系统测试：在路上
全球导航卫星系统测试：在公园里
全球导航卫星系统测试：在公园里
全球导航卫星系统测试：概述
全球导航卫星系统测试：概述

电话功能和语音质量

你可以在谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 中插入一张物理 Nano-SIM 卡，需要双 SIM 卡的用户还可以额外设置一张 eSIM 卡。另外，你也可以设置两个 eSIM 卡。如果使用双 SIM 卡，可以启用系统根据接收质量自动更改数据连接。支持 VoLTE 和 WLAN 通话等功能，但系统中未集成 SIP 账户控制功能。

使用听筒，谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 的语音质量非常自然，大部分恼人的噪音都被可靠地过滤掉了。即使背景有很多声音，但大部分时间都能很好地消除，用户的声音也会随之听起来变细。但 Pixel 会被嘈杂的街道噪音淹没。扬声器模式在安静的环境中效果很好，麦克风的范围也不错。

摄像头 - Pixel 8 Pro 配备超 HDR 功能

光线不足时的自拍
光线不足时的自拍
以纵向模式拍摄的自拍照
以纵向模式拍摄的自拍照

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 的前置摄像头采用 1050 万像素镜头，同样提供自动对焦功能。视频最多只能以 60 FPS 的超高清分辨率录制，如果要以 HDR 格式录制，则只能限制在 30 FPS。自拍照在弱光环境下也很美观，而且有丰富的处理选项。

主摄像头采用了与前代产品相同的功能强大的 50 百万像素三星传感器。新的超广角传感器可提供 4800 万像素和 5 倍光学变焦，光圈为 f/2.8，感光度更高。主传感器和长焦传感器均可使用光学防抖（OIS）功能。

使用主摄像头拍摄的照片效果非常好。只是在困难的情况下，自动对焦并不总是能完美地工作。即使在弱光环境下，由于夜景模式的存在，拍摄效果依然很好。超广角镜头有了明显改善，尽管有些细节在全尺寸放大时会显得模糊不清。由于传感器还可用于微距拍摄，因此效果也不错。

不放大
主传感器
2 倍变焦
2x
5 秒变焦
5x
10 倍变焦
10x
30 倍变焦
30x

光学变焦可达 5 倍，数码变焦可达 30 倍。当然，纯数字变焦并不完美，但与竞争对手相比，照片看起来确实不错。从 15 倍变焦开始，还增加了一个数字取景器。在这一变焦级别，电子图像稳定（EIS）功能也非常强大。虽然最初看起来非常稳定，但相机的一些较小的移动会出现一些延迟，实时取景也是如此。这一点肯定可以做得更好。

谷歌为 Pixel 8 Pro 宣传了许多人工智能功能。我们已经从 像素 7 Pro.现在，这款智能手机还能纠正合影照片中的人脸，因此再也不会有人在错误的时刻移开视线或闭上双眼了。要纠正这种情况，手机会搜索设备上的其他照片和 Top Photo 创建的照片，然后你就可以简单地替换脸部。这样做效果很好，但也要花不少时间（10 到 15 秒）。

神奇编辑器是一项附加功能，它只有在图片首次保存到谷歌云端时才会起作用。在这里，可以对人物或物体进行特殊遮罩，以便将其移动到其他位置、放大或缩小。大多数情况下，自动选择的效果都不错，但有时也会出现人物的某些部分没有完全捕捉到的情况。使用 iPhone甚至无需云连接。

在Android 14 中，超 HDR 也首次用于照片，因此它并不是 Pixel 智能手机的专属功能。相应的信息会被添加到图片中，允许兼容程序将其传输到支持 HDR 的显示屏上，这样就可以相应地调整图像区域的亮度。 如果有合适的输出设备，就可以获得更加鲜艳的照片。

视频可以超高清和 16:9 格式录制，最高每秒 60 帧。想要直接录制 HDR 的用户可以在 30 和 24 FPS 之间进行选择。此外，Pixel 8 Pro 还提供柔化和平移模式。前者可以创建柔和、模糊的背景（最高全高清，24 FPS），后者则可以通过自动延时创建稳定的平移镜头（最高超高清，30 FPS）。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images

我们继续在可控光线条件下测试 Pixel 8 Pro 的摄像头。测试图表的记录非常细腻，没有任何夸张的过度锐化。

ColorChecker 图表的色彩再现没有任何明显的异常值，不过青色接近极限，白平衡也相当温暖。

ColorChecker
4.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 8 Pro: 5.18 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 10.75 ∆E
ColorChecker
23 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
22 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
43.8 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
34.5 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 8 Pro: 29.1 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 46.06 ∆E

配件和保修 - Pixel 8 Pro 的超薄包装盒

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 的包装盒中再次不含充电器，其他内容保持不变：除了一条 USB-C 连接线外，包装盒中还有一个 OTG 适配器（USB-C 转 USB-A）和一个 SIM 卡工具。您还可以选择购买 29 欧元（约合 31 美元）的 30 瓦充电器和 79 欧元（约合 84 美元）的二代 Pixel 支架。

谷歌为其智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 带红外温度计的 Pixel 智能手机

您可以通过电容式触摸屏对 Pixel 8 Pro 进行输入，它可以快速、准确地执行输入，并提供非常好的滑动特性。 两个物理按键紧紧地固定在边框中，提供了短而清晰的按键触感。

背面摄像头旁边有一个红外传感器，可用于测量表面温度。谷歌明确指出，这不是用于测量体温的温度计。为了获得尽可能准确的结果，你应该仔细选择表面材料。一旦您这样做了，测量结果就会与我们的 Voltcraft IR-260 达到类似水平，显示的温度仅低 0.5 至 1.5 °C（0.9 - 2.7 °F）。

显示屏上的光学指纹传感器提供生物识别安全功能。大部分时间的识别率都不错，解锁智能手机的速度也相当快。此外，你还可以使用 2D 人脸识别技术，它的识别速度更快，但安全性不高。

线性振动电机提供了强大而有吸引力的触觉反馈。

显示 - Google 降低了分辨率

子像素结构
子像素结构

与前代产品相比，谷歌降低了 Pixel 8 Pro 的显示屏分辨率。 不过，考虑到像素密度为 490 PPI不过，考虑到 490 PPI 的像素密度，这几乎不会引起注意。LTPO-OLED 面板现在明显更亮了。谷歌称其亮度可达 1,600 cd/m²（HDR）和 2,400 cd/m²（最高亮度）。刷新率由系统在 1 到 120 Hz 之间自动调节。

在测量中，我们的测试设备在纯白显示内容和激活亮度传感器的情况下达到了 1,510 cd/m² 的最高亮度。在亮部和暗部均匀分布的情况下（APL18），最高亮度可达 2,202 cd/m²，而在 HDR 再现情况下，最高亮度可达 2,363 cd/m²。如果只是手动调节亮度，则可达到 985 cd/m²。

遗憾的是，显示屏的 OLED 闪烁频率并不高。我们使用示波器测量到，在显示屏亮度最低时，闪烁频率为 120 赫兹，振幅稳定。当亮度超过 43% 时，频率会增加一倍，达到 240 Hz。对显示屏闪烁敏感的用户可能会遇到一些问题。

1506
cd/m²		1503
cd/m²		1405
cd/m²
1507
cd/m²		1510
cd/m²		1410
cd/m²
1502
cd/m²		1478
cd/m²		1384
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1510 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1467.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1510 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.7"		Xiaomi 13T Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.8"		Honor Magic5 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"		Google Pixel 7 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Screen
-12%
-4%
-30%
-28%
7%
Brightness middle
1510
1252
-17%
1102
-27%
1117
-26%
1291
-15%
1022
-32%
Brightness
1467
1230
-16%
1102
-25%
1133
-23%
1289
-12%
1025
-30%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
98
7%
97
5%
96
4%
99
8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.4
-27%
1.1
-0%
2.2
-100%
1.7
-55%
0.9
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.8
3.1
18%
3.1
18%
3.9
-3%
4.4
-16%
2.1
45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
2.3
-35%
1.6
6%
2.3
-35%
2.9
-71%
1.1
35%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.37 93%
2.28 96%
2.22 99%
CCT
6670 97%
6590 99%
6555 99%
6572 99%
6472 100%
6650 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8492 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

以固定变焦级别进行系列测量，亮度设置各不相同

卡尔曼分析法的色彩还原令人信服。在灰阶中，只有两个最亮的白色色调显示出非常轻微的绿色色调，而在色彩中，如果没有测量设备，也看不出明显的色差。

灰度（色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（颜色：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.568 ms rise
↘ 0.504 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.85 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.024 ms rise
↘ 0.822 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

在户外，谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 的显示内容即使在晴天也能轻松读取，因此在户外使用它时不会有任何限制。

户外活动（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
户外活动（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）

即使从非常陡峭的角度观看，OLED 显示屏的视角稳定性也非常好。亮度几乎没有降低，内容上也只有一层几乎不明显的绿纱。

视角稳定性 谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro
视角稳定性 谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro

性能 - Tensor G3 落后于竞争对手

Pixel 8 Pro 使用内置的 谷歌张量 G3SoC 芯片，配备 12GB 工作内存。该芯片组总共可使用多达九个 CPU 内核，其中一个是代表最强大单元的 Cortex X3，主频高达 2.91 GHz。SoC 由三星公司采用 4 纳米工艺制造。

在 CPU 性能方面，Tensor G3 无法与 Apple A17 Pro和Dimensity 9200+或 骁龙 8 代 2在高端领域，Pixel 8 Pro 显然排在最后一位。只有在当前的 Geekbench 6.2 中，Pixel 8 Pro 才领先于 小米 13T Pro采用联发科芯片组。

即使Android 在日常操作中运行流畅，Pixel 8 Pro 在系统基准测试中的表现也不是特别好，在我们的对比领域中也只排在最后一位。总之，在这一点上，Tensor G3 的表现更接近于现代高级 SoC 的水平，例如 骁龙 7+ Gen 2.

如果你认为 Pixel 8 Pro 最终会在人工智能基准测试中迎头赶上，那你也会失望的。在 Procyon 基准测试中，它甚至比上一代产品更慢，而在 AIMark 和 Geekbench ML 基准测试中，它的速度也只是微乎其微。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v9 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1549 Points +22%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1502 Points +18%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1486 Points +17%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points
Average Google Tensor G3
  (1260 - 1274, n=3)
1267 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1225 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=168, last 2 years)
1082 Points -15%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1048 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
4974 Points +37%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
4846 Points +34%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4793 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
3948 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=168, last 2 years)
3647 Points +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points
Average Google Tensor G3
  (3366 - 3624, n=3)
3462 Points -4%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3222 Points -11%
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +66%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1985 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1984 Points +12%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points
Average Google Tensor G3
  (1653 - 1769, n=3)
1707 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1687 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=202, last 2 years)
1546 Points -13%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1491 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1465 Points -17%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5149 Points +13%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5119 Points +13%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=202, last 2 years)
4401 Points -3%
Average Google Tensor G3
  (4225 - 4538, n=3)
4390 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
4378 Points -4%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
3967 Points -13%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3787 Points -17%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1478071 Points +65%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1227867 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1134684 Points +27%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1115567 Points +24%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
896410 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=83, last 2 years)
814041 Points -9%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
773857 Points -14%
Average Google Tensor G3
  (603046 - 896410, n=2)
749728 Points -16%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1508318 Points +35%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1487075 Points +34%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1398472 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=133, last 2 years)
1328327 Points +19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points
Average Google Tensor G3
  (1049981 - 1113506, n=3)
1090261 Points -2%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15550 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
15270 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
14143 Points +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=196, last 2 years)
13789 Points +17%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
13573 Points +15%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points
Average Google Tensor G3
  (10897 - 11824, n=3)
11429 Points -3%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
11397 Points -4%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1221 Points +31%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
992 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=163, last 2 years)
981 Points +5%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
941 Points +1%
Average Google Tensor G3
  (919 - 955, n=3)
936 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
886 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
817 Points -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
44231 Points +64%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
42662 Points +58%
Average Google Tensor G3
  (25563 - 29654, n=3)
27412 Points +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=152, last 2 years)
17965 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16702 Points -38%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
11338 Points -58%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
10511 Points -61%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points +2523%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=141, last 2 years)
27234 Points +2356%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1320 Points +19%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1266 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, Adreno 725, 8192
1189 Points +7%
Average Google Tensor G3
  (1109 - 1136, n=2)
1123 Points +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1109 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1008 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench ML
0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1418 Points +230%
Average of class Smartphone
  (381 - 1418, n=4, last 2 years)
841 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
620 Points +44%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
608 Points +41%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
430 Points
Average Google Tensor G3
  (n=1)
430 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
319 Points -26%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2842 Points +162%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2443 Points +125%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
2202 Points +103%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1058 - 2842, n=4, last 2 years)
1798 Points +66%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1085 Points
Average Google Tensor G3
  (n=1)
1085 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
1002 Points -8%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
3638 Points +80%
Average of class Smartphone
  (344 - 3638, n=4, last 2 years)
2346 Points +16%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288
2164 Points +7%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
2026 Points
Average Google Tensor G3
  (n=1)
2026 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
672 Points -67%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
633 Points -69%

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 采用集成的 ARM Mali-G715 MP7作为图形处理器。尽管它比 G710 MP7更快。像素 7 Pro，但在所有方面都比竞争对手慢。

由于谷歌在这里没有使用 Immortalis 版本的 G715，因此也不支持光线追踪。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3699 Points +53%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3595 Points +49%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3011 Points +25%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1807 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3857 Points +59%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points +55%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3687 Points +52%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3067 Points +27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1847 Points -24%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13911 Points +56%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13827 Points +55%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11678 Points +31%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6721 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8582 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6534 Points -24%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6231 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6185 Points +23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4672 Points -7%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3982 Points -21%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24707 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21767 Points +58%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19231 Points +40%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10987 Points -20%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14893 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13955 Points +40%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10301 Points +4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8449 Points -15%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
504 fps +45%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
472 fps +36%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
459 fps +32%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps +28%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
251 fps -28%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -30%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps +72%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps +56%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps +51%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
260 fps +49%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
139 fps -20%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +4%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -48%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
206 fps +84%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
193 fps +72%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
186 fps +66%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps +61%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -10%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +54%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +14%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -15%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
125 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +64%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps +47%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
103 fps +37%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -9%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +56%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +10%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -6%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -13%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +84%
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +70%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps +65%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps +57%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -16%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +32%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps -14%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -34%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -35%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +44%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps +39%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps +26%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps +19%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -23%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps +88%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps +88%
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27 fps +69%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps +56%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -12%

Basemark GPUScore

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø33.6 (18.7-75.3)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø39.7 (12.6-75.3)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official VRS; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø35 (19.4-94.5)
Xiaomi 13T Pro Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official VRS; 1.0.0 Vulkan 1.0: Ø38.2 (24.7-214)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø13.2 (8.01-25.8)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø17.9 (11.2-78)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official VRS; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø13.7 (7.66-24.4)

由于 Pixel 8 Pro 的计算能力在我们的对比领域中最低，因此它没有进入前几名也就不足为奇了。不过，在基准测试中，它仍足以确保在该领域中处于中等位置。主观感觉上，上网速度很快，没有任何值得一提的延迟。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +142%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
159.102 Points +51%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
136.736 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)
135.1 Points +28%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
116.696 Points +11%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (94.8 - 105.2, n=3)
101.4 Points -4%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98.153 Points -7%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min +182%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
176 runs/min +11%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=151, last 2 years)
164.2 runs/min +4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min
Average Google Tensor G3 (136 - 161, n=3)
151.7 runs/min -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
143 runs/min -9%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
111 runs/min -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
104 runs/min -34%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 110)
145 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=162, last 2 years)
125.9 Points +22%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
103 Points
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
98 Points -5%
Average Google Tensor G3 (94 - 103, n=3)
97.3 Points -6%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
95 Points -8%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
90 Points -13%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
304 Points +136%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=76, last 2 years)
156.7 Points +21%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
143 Points +11%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
129 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (115 - 135, n=3)
126.3 Points -2%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
98 Points -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
59214 Points +20%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (46738 - 49506, n=3)
48007 Points -3%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
44245 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)
42443 Points -14%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
39825 Points -20%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
36482 Points -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=171, last 2 years)
1439 ms * -71%
Xiaomi 13T Pro (Chrome 117)
1143.43 ms * -36%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)
1011.5 ms * -20%
Honor Magic5 Pro (Chrome 111)
981.4 ms * -17%
Average Google Tensor G3 (840 - 998, n=3)
908 ms * -8%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
685 ms * +18%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +54%

* ... smaller is better

游戏 - 不仅仅是休闲游戏

尽管ARM Mali-G715 MP7虽然 Pixel 8 Pro 不支持光线追踪，但在本次测试中，它仍能为 Play Store 中的所有游戏提供足够的动力。遗憾的是，我们目前仍无法显示任何游戏基准，因为GameBench仍未针对Android 14 进行优化。我们将尽快添加。

即使是要求苛刻的游戏，也能在全细节设置下运行，而不会遇到任何明显的问题。只有在《Genshin Impact》中，我们不时发现一些小的卡顿。

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
No graph data

发射 - Pixel 8 Pro 的双扬声器

温度

在负载情况下，谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 的表面温度明显升高。我们使用 Burnout 基准进行了模拟，某些位置的温度几乎达到 44 °C（111 °F）。不过，这在日常操作中不成问题。

在 3DMark 的压力测试中，Tensor G3 Pro 的散热效果非常出色。 张力 G3无法保持 SoC 的稳定，但也只是适度降低了 12% 至 14%。即使 骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy在S23 Ultra的骁龙 8 代 2 也会被大幅节流，损失更多性能，但它的速度仍然更快。

Max. Load
 37.7 °C40 °C38.9 °C 
 40.5 °C40.6 °C40.4 °C 
 38.6 °C43 °C42.5 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 40.2 °C
40.9 °C42.4 °C41.3 °C
41.1 °C41.1 °C42.4 °C
41.5 °C42.5 °C43.8 °C
Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 41.9 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 %
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.2 % -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 % -12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.9 % -14%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40.8 % -48%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.7 % +1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 %
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.6 % -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.7 % -23%
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.9 % -38%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13T Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200+, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.3 %
Honor Magic5 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.1 %
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.4 (11-14.5)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.8 (13.5-23)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø45.7 (40.7-51.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (53.6-77.7)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø47.9 (43.4-53.7)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø72.7 (55.1-86.1)

发言人

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 的两个扬声器能产生相当宽广的声像，即使超高频有些急剧下降，低频也只是微弱。虽然声音整体略显沉闷，但仍然是智能手机领域音效较好的产品之一。

在外部声音输出方面，你可以使用 USB 端口进行有线输出，或者也可以使用蓝牙 5.3。蓝牙 5.3 支持多种编解码器，但缺少一些高通公司最新的编解码器，如 aptX Adaptive 和 TWS+。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.440.92531.222.73125.125.94029.926.65032.133.56323.128.38023.631.410022.437.412516.848.716016.559.320013.459.825014.158.631512.956.24001358.350011.763.263011.668.380012.972.3100013.374.8125013.174.6160012.475200012.678.3250012.577.3315012.480.1400012.780.6500013.181.8630013.578.5800013.670.31000013.4681250013.671.81600013.461SPL2589.4N0.677.3median 13.1median 71.8Delta1.29.233.834.727.935.324.334.828.240.536.739.422.237.525.442.32144.318.648.315.458.615.159.213.161126112.76211.868.212.967.310.473.413.374.813.27812.179.312.279.912.982.314.88115.882.516.182.614.479.613.680.413.578.614.473.51570.225.991.80.789.6median 13.5median 74.81.39hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 8 ProSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 谷歌智能手机为 5,050 毫安时

耗电量

与前代产品相比，谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 的功耗有所改善，处于不明显的水平。我们测得的负载下更高的功耗值可以追溯到我们现在使用的 Burnout 基准测试，它比我们之前的稳定性测试要求更高。

Pixel 8 Pro 支持高达 30 瓦（PD 3.0）的有线快速充电。使用相应的充电器，它可以在 30 分钟内将电量恢复到 50%。如果使用 Pixel Stand（第二代），可以使用最高 23 瓦的无线充电，而普通 Qi 充电器最高支持 12 瓦。在测试中，使用 王牌 313(45 瓦）充电器为智能手机充电，耗时 101 分钟。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.05 / 0.12 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.63 / 1.47 / 1.55 Watt
Load midlight 8.45 / 8.63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Xiaomi 13T Pro
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
5000 mAh		Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh		Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh		Average Google Tensor G3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-25%
-0%
15%
11%
10%
-0%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.99
-57%
0.5
21%
0.9
-43%
0.91
-44%
0.78
-24%
0.703 ?(0.56 - 0.92, n=3)
-12%
0.876 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=165, last 2 years)
-39%
Idle Average *
1.47
1.14
22%
1.97
-34%
1.05
29%
1.63
-11%
1.61
-10%
1.337 ?(1.08 - 1.47, n=3)
9%
1.441 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=165, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Maximum *
1.55
1.34
14%
1.99
-28%
1.1
29%
1.67
-8%
1.63
-5%
1.457 ?(1.17 - 1.65, n=3)
6%
1.585 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=165, last 2 years)
-2%
Load Average *
8.45
10.06
-19%
3.36
60%
3.99
53%
2.61
69%
3.29
61%
8.14 ?(7.96 - 8.45, n=3)
4%
6.95 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=156, last 2 years)
18%
Load Maximum *
8.63
15.94
-85%
10.43
-21%
7.82
9%
4.57
47%
6.01
30%
9.42 ?(8.63 - 10.7, n=3)
-9%
10.4 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=156, last 2 years)
-21%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (0.838-8.49)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.7 (1.089-14.7)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.749 (0.708-1.133)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.6 (5.39-7.54)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-12.7)
Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.749 (0.708-1.133)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)

电池寿命

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 的电池容量为 5,050 毫安时，比上一代产品略大。它在测试中提供了良好的续航时间，与前代产品相比，有些续航时间更好，有些则更差。 像素 7 Pro.但令人惊讶的是，它的续航时间明显短于竞争对手。

比较运行时间的最佳方法是在调整后的显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）下进行测试。尽管 Pixel 8 Pro 在 WLAN 测试中比 7 Pro 多持续近 1.5 小时，但竞争对手的持续时间要长 41% 到 53%。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 24min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 117)
12h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 40min
Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Xiaomi 13T Pro
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
5000 mAh		Honor Magic5 Pro
5100 mAh		Google Pixel 7 Pro
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
47%
92%
56%
42%
-3%
Reader / Idle
1344
1798
34%
3514
161%
2139
59%
2580
92%
1210
-10%
H.264
1122
1298
16%
2013
79%
1543
38%
1249
11%
1213
8%
WiFi v1.3
760
1099
45%
1163
53%
1100
45%
1074
41%
676
-11%
Load
220
427
94%
384
75%
400
82%
276
25%
226
3%

Pros

+ 出色的相机设置
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 七年更新
+ 明亮准确的 LTPO 显示屏
+ 防尘防水

Cons

- 只有 UFS 3.1
- 人工智能功能位于云端
- 无有线显示输出
- 只有高端 SoC

评语 - 全面的整体包装，出色的相机

测试谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro。测试机由德国谷歌公司提供。
测试谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro。测试机由德国谷歌公司提供。

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 是一款非常出色的智能手机，拥有纯正的Android ，其全面的整体概念和优雅的设计给人留下了深刻印象。Pixel 的显示屏非常明亮、准确，系统性能良好，相机配置也很出色。在测试期间，Pixel 拥有长达七年的更新保证，是更新保证时间最长的智能手机。在这一点上，即使是Apple 和三星也无法与之媲美。只有 Fairphone 5 的更新时间更长，至少安全补丁的更新时间更长。

谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 以其较长的更新周期和出色的摄像头给人留下了深刻印象，但它可以为高端智能手机提供更强大的性能。

当然，有可能使用更多年的手机也会对价格产生影响。但价格上涨的幅度相当大，让 Pixel 8 Pro 失去了 "超值 "的特性，尤其是入门级版本的存储空间相对较小，只有 128 GB。存储速度也明显慢于竞争对手，因为它们都已经提供了更先进的 UFS 4.0 存储。在 SoC 方面，谷歌也没有提供非常强大的功能，备受赞誉的谷歌人工智能只能在谷歌云中运行。

不过，对于那些只想寻找一款可以长期使用，同时软件始终保持最新的日常伴侣的用户来说，谷歌智能手机将是他们的最佳选择--包括出色的拍照效果。那些希望获得更强计算能力，同时减少与云的绑定并延长电池续航时间的人，可能会在 Galaxy S23 Ultra.而那些对Apple 宇宙持开放态度的人则应该看看 iPhone 15 Pro Max.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

Pixel 8 Pro 的所有颜色和存储版本均可直接从谷歌购买，999 美元起。.此外，您也可以从亚马逊等网站购买。

Google Pixel 8 Pro - 11/07/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
57 / 70 → 81%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
94%
Games Performance
69 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
83%
Average
83%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 谷歌 Pixel 8 Pro 评测--功能强大的Android 智能手机，7 年一更新
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-11- 9 (Update: 2024-08-15)