Notebookcheck Logo

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 智能手机评测--配备 AMOLED 显示屏和出色摄像头的中端手机

削减成本措施。 如果你正在寻找一款不错的中端手机,并且可以不用 5G,那么小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 是一款经济实惠的产品。它保留了 5G 机型的高品质摄像头、现代机身和快速充电技术。难道厂家还是为了节省而增加了一些减配?
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (Redmi Note 13 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB 
, 495 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 161.1 x 75
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 67 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix f/​1.65, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), OIS, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @1080p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid) , silicone bumper, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP54-certified, SAR: 0.992W/​kg Head, 0.993W/​kg Body , fanless
Weight
188 g
Price
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.5 %
05/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
188 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.8 %
01/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710
187 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2712x1220
83.9 %
02/2024
Honor Magic6 Lite
SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710
185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2652x1200
81.9 %
12/2022
Motorola Moto G72
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
166 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080

外壳和功能 - 高质量塑料外壳

并非所有智能手机买家都需要 5G,因此,一款价格略低的高品质 4G 中端手机仍有发展空间。这就是小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 隆重登场的原因,因为它带来了 13 Pro 5G 的许多优势。 Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G但价格便宜 50 欧元。

虽然背面相似,但小米在设计上做了一些改动,使 4G 机型一眼就能辨认出来。在颜色和手感方面,该机没有突出的一组相机模块,而是在外壳中安装了单独的镜头。背面上部有两条稍浅的条纹。可选颜色有绿色、紫色和黑色。

4G 机型正面的显示屏边缘也非常纤薄,前置摄像头的打孔也非常小。即使用力也很难扭动设备,整体看起来非常稳定。所有边角都做了圆滑处理,使手机握在手中非常舒适。

该机提供 IP54 级防尘和防水溅保护,但不应将设备浸入水中。  

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 提供两种存储版本:

  • 8 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间:349欧元
  • 12 GB RAM / 512 GB 存储空间:399 欧元

手机配备了 NFC 功能和红外线发射器,可用作其他设备的遥控器。此外还有一个 3.5 毫米音频接口。

Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G不支持 eSIM 卡,但有一个 microSD 读卡器。它占用了两个 SIM 卡插槽中的一个,在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考存储卡进行的测试中,它的速度在同价位产品中表现平平。


尺寸比较

163.6 mm 75.5 mm 7.98 mm 185 g161.2 mm 74.3 mm 8 mm 187 g161.1 mm 75 mm 8 mm 188 g160.5 mm 74.4 mm 7.9 mm 166 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
36.3 MB/s
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.2 MB/s -6%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.5 (26.8-45.5)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (26.7-49.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (46.2-79.8)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.6 (29.3-82.6)

通信、软件和操作 - 更新至 2028 年

由于有许多 4G 频率,这款智能手机还可以在旅行时用于许多国家的移动互联网。在测试期间,我们很喜欢它的接收质量。

WiFi 5 是Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 支持的最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。速度约为 300 - 350 MBit/s。该设备的 Wi-Fi 速度比 5G 版慢,几乎只有 5G 版的一半。不过,这只有在日常使用大容量下载时才会明显感觉到。

小米安装了Android 13 ex-works,并叠加了旧版 MIUI 界面,但现在也可以更新到Android 14 和小米的新 HyperOS。在测试时,安全补丁是从 2024 年 3 月开始的,因此仍然是合理的最新版本。小米希望在 2028 年之前再提供两个操作系统版本和安全补丁。

手机上预装了不少应用程序,包括许多广告应用程序和游戏。因此,如果你想要一个干净的系统,就必须删除其中一些。

120 Hz 的屏幕可实现极快的输入速度和响应速度,即使在边角位置也是如此。指纹传感器集成在显示屏中,解锁手机非常快速可靠。人脸识别功能也能完美运行,即使在昏暗的光线下也是如此。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
290 (min: 240) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 332) MBit/s ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
581 (min: 491) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
678 (min: 544) MBit/s ∼97%
Honor Magic6 Lite
iperf3 receive AXE11000
340 (min: 173) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
316 (min: 278) MBit/s ∼45%
Motorola Moto G72
iperf3 receive AXE11000
333 (min: 307) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
359 (min: 338) MBit/s ∼52%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
662 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
696 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø290 (240-317)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (332-368)

相机 - 高质量中档相机

前置摄像头拍摄的照片
前置摄像头拍摄的照片

Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 的高品质摄像头系统也被 4G 机型所采用。手机背面的照片通常由 20000 万像素的主摄像头拍摄,该摄像头通常将每 16 个像素组合在一起,以获得更高的得光率,从而拍摄出 1200 万像素的照片。全分辨率可在特殊模式下使用。光学稳定器可防止图像模糊。

主摄像头拍摄的照片细节丰富,在较暗的环境下亮度也很高,令人赏心悦目。我们还发现照片的清晰度也不错,尽管在某些区域会出现一些抖动。

4G 机型只能以 1080p 和 60 fps 的速度录制视频;5G 机型的 4K 功能已被取消。

广角摄像头提供 800 万像素,拍照效果不错,但边缘清晰度明显下降。小米还安装了一个 200 万像素的微距摄像头,用于拍摄极限特写。该摄像头适合拍摄快照,但不宜将图像放大太多。

前置自拍摄像头分辨率为 1600 万像素。照片看起来光线还算不错,细节也符合这个价位的水平。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle
ColorChecker
8.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: 7.03 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 12.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
23 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: 10.03 ∆E min: 4.8 - max: 23.02 ∆E

显示屏 - 明亮的真彩 AMOLED

子像素结构
子像素结构

屏幕亮度不如 5G 机型。虽然Redmi Note 13 4G 也采用了 AMOLED 屏幕,但还有其他不同之处:分辨率略低,PWM 闪烁频率较低。

具体来说,我们测得的最大亮度约为 1,000 cd/m²,与制造商的规格完全一致。在较小的表面上,亮度还能进一步提高,我们测得的亮度为 1,198 cd/m²。Redmi Note 13 4G 的亮度分布相当均匀,色彩还原度非常高,因此也能获得非常高质量的显示屏。

954
cd/m²
967
cd/m²
986
cd/m²
1001
cd/m²
994
cd/m²
962
cd/m²
972
cd/m²
983
cd/m²
988
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1001 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 978.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 994 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
105.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.287
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67
Honor Magic6 Lite
AMOLED, 2652x1200, 6.78
Motorola Moto G72
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
Screen
-0%
23%
-67%
Brightness middle
994
1205
21%
1003
1%
992
0%
Brightness
979
1177
20%
1007
3%
980
0%
Brightness Distribution
95
90
-5%
96
1%
92
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.36
1.51
-11%
0.8
41%
4.56
-235%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.61
4.07
-13%
2.4
34%
7.96
-120%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
2.5
-14%
0.9
59%
3.1
-41%
Gamma
2.287 96%
2.175 101%
2.18 101%
2.233 99%
CCT
6392 102%
6407 101%
6406 101%
7098 92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17744 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列


卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功耗相当低

采用 联发科 Helio G99小米选择了一款相当慢的 SoC,与 Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G你不得不接受明显的性能损失。现在,其他制造商也在这个价位提供速度更快的手机。

在日常使用中,Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 并不是一款速度很慢的手机;在大多数情况下,都可以流畅地浏览菜单。只有在运行多任务或更复杂的应用程序时,性能上的差异才会非常明显。小米选择了 UFS 2.2 闪存,速度快,加载时间短。

长时间使用后,手机外壳的温度会升高到 40.8 °C;我们是在室温下测量的。这很明显,但并不严重,3DMark 压力测试表明,即使在长时间负载的情况下,SoC 也能保持其性能。

底部边缘的扬声器由听筒支持,因此可以实现立体声音效。声音饱满而温暖,听音乐是一种享受。当然,在大多数情况下,你不得不放弃低音和中低音,但对于中档手机来说,我们喜欢这样的音效。

如果您想要更好的音效,可以通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器。蓝牙支持目前几乎所有的无线编解码器。

电池容量为 5000 毫安时,比 5G 机型略小,但在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中仍能保持 16 小时以上的良好续航时间。这意味着你可以在不充电的情况下连续使用一天。如果手机确实需要插电,可通过随附的电源适配器以高达 67 瓦的功率充电,因此只需不到一小时就能充满电。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=202, last 2 years)
919 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
783 Points +40%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
735 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
558 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (490 - 576, n=16)
546 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
540 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=202, last 2 years)
3043 Points +58%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2736 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2678 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1922 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1670 - 1981, n=16)
1830 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1810 Points -6%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=117, last 2 years)
1357 Points +86%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1029 Points +41%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
940 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
731 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (710 - 738, n=10)
727 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=117, last 2 years)
3767 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2955 Points +48%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2776 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2000 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1864 - 2065, n=10)
1984 Points -1%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
12967 Points +19%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
12573 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=201, last 2 years)
11960 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10933 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
10589 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11027, n=16)
9801 Points -10%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=210, last 2 years)
12.7 fps +388%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5.8 fps +123%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4.7 fps +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2.6 fps
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2.5 fps -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=16)
2.5 fps -4%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=214, last 2 years)
33.5 fps +264%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
15 fps +63%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
12 fps +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8.3 - 28, n=16)
11.5 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
9.2 fps
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.9 fps -3%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=214, last 2 years)
26.6 fps +343%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
13 fps +117%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
11 fps +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
6 fps
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.9 fps -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5.4 - 6.5, n=16)
5.88 fps -2%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=214, last 2 years)
45.3 fps +224%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
23 fps +64%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (12 - 44, n=16)
17.4 fps +24%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
14 fps
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
10 fps -29%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=214, last 2 years)
66.3 fps +314%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
35 fps +119%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
20 fps +25%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
16 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (14 - 18, n=16)
15.7 fps -2%
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5226, n=194, last 2 years)
1766 Points +416%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
800 Points +134%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
615 Points +80%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
347 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (330 - 378, n=16)
346 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
342 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=190, last 2 years)
1770 Points +430%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
788 Points +136%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
623 Points +87%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
337 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (323 - 366, n=16)
337 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
334 Points
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3039 Points +150%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 13896, n=125, last 2 years)
2682 Points +121%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2367 Points +95%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1165 - 1364, n=16)
1239 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1214 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1183 Points -3%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=191, last 2 years)
6568 Points +437%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3046 Points +149%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2311 Points +89%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1232 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1223 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1011 - 1340, n=16)
1193 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4683 Points +80%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4087 Points +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=94, last 2 years)
2719 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2600 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2595 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2471 - 2791, n=15)
2595 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4837 Points +100%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
3967 Points +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=94, last 2 years)
2713 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2326 - 2655, n=15)
2435 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2433 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2421 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4534 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4215 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3471 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3425 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3101 - 3471, n=15)
3356 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=94, last 2 years)
3143 Points -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
35379 Points +74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 89112, n=208, last 2 years)
33762 Points +66%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
24583 Points +21%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (17228 - 25005, n=16)
20758 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
20319 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
18237 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GHonor Magic6 LiteMotorola Moto G72Average 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-0%
29%
-12%
19%
35%
Sequential Read 256KB
933.8
946.8
1%
1827.3
96%
868.5
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
795.4
808.2
2%
843.34
6%
497.5
-37%
Random Read 4KB
246.8
239.2
-3%
223.75
-9%
231.4
-6%
292 ?(247 - 337, n=2)
18%
Random Write 4KB
222.2
220.5
-1%
271.22
22%
230.2
4%
306 ?(222 - 390, n=2)
38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GHonor Magic6 LiteAverage 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
-19%
9%
10%
30%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
819 ?(3.0.4061)
758 ?(3.0.4061)
-7%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
726 ?(3.0.4061)
776 ?(3.0.4061)
7%
818 ?(726 - 909, n=2)
13%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
45.4 ?(3.0.4061)
25.7 ?(3.0.4061)
-43%
48.2 ?(45.4 - 51, n=2)
6%
Storage 2.0 random write int.
67.7 ?(3.0.4061)
41.2 ?(3.0.4061)
-39%
Storage 2.0
26431 ?(3.0.4061)
23116 ?(3.0.4061)
-13%
28736
9%
Max. Load
 40.8 °C35.7 °C35 °C 
 40.3 °C37.2 °C35 °C 
 39.3 °C36.8 °C34.3 °C 
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 37.2 °C
33.8 °C35.4 °C37.2 °C
34.4 °C37.2 °C38.8 °C
33.3 °C37.2 °C38.3 °C
Maximum: 38.8 °C
Average: 36.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.8 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 %
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.1 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % +1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.9 %
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.07 (2.06-2.08)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.75 (4.74-4.76)
Honor Magic6 Lite Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.68 (3.67-3.69)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.08 (2.08-2.09)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.44 (7.35-7.47)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.1 (18.1-18.2)
Honor Magic6 Lite Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.3-14.3)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.67 (6.59-6.79)
正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.2382533.233.53127.126.54030.528.4503431.46325.823.4801717.910019.922.212525.427.316017.334.920010.639.725014.447.53158.149.94007.450.75007.860.4630961.180012.561.4100017.273.412509.47316001072.620009.867.8250010.362.331501162.340001265.9500012.670.9630013.572.7800014.4681000015.271.31250015.971.81600016.851.5SPL24.881.6N0.648.4median 12.5median 62.3Delta3.211.535.437.13839.725.828.727.427.930.232.228.929.618.822.716.32013.826.514.635.812.742.51748.810.15710.362.211.966.712.76713.769.114.174.115.576.31276.912.7771376.913.474.113.867.81564.515.461.916.267.817.76917.663.618.659.926.585.40.858.3median 13.8median 66.71.57.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GMotorola Moto G72
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G72 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 9min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh
Honor Magic6 Lite
5300 mAh
Motorola Moto G72
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
969
1002
3%
906
-7%
929
-4%

Pros

+ 外壳美观、坚固
+ 内存充足
+ 明亮的 AMOLED
+ ... 120 Hz,色彩保真度高
+ 4 年更新
+ 灵活的摄像系统
+ 良好的扬声器
+ 快速充电

Cons

- 不支持 5G
- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- 不支持 4K 视频录制
- 处理器性能相对较低
- PWM 闪烁
- 预装应用程序多

结论 - 与 5G 机型相比,设备差异显著

回顾:小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G。测试设备由提供:
回顾:小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G。测试设备由提供:
nbb.com

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 是一款出色的中端手机,但在其 5G 兄弟面前却有些黯然失色。虽然它拥有同样高品质的相机系统,但却没有最大亮度。你还必须接受较低的屏幕分辨率、没有 4K 视频录制功能、较慢的 Wi-Fi 速度以及不支持 eSIM 卡。此外,顾名思义,它还不能使用 5G 网络,性能也会大打折扣。

对于 50 欧元的差价,根据零售商的不同又会有不同的看法,小米采取的成本削减措施还真不少。小米 Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G绝对是一个强有力的竞争对手,你应该考虑为它的诸多优势支付一点溢价。

不过,就我们的测试设备本身而言,时尚现代的外壳、快速充电、良好的运行时间、明亮且色彩真实的屏幕以及出色的功能都给人留下了深刻印象。因此,它绝对是一款值得购买的产品。几乎没有真正的弱点:软件方面,内置了大量臃肿的软件,这不是它的亮点,而且屏幕的 PWM 闪烁可能会给敏感人群带来困扰。

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 是一款性能强劲的中端手机,它的竞争对手是配置更高的 5G 机型。

如果你想换个品牌,可以看看 摩托罗拉 Edge 40 NeoHonor Magic6 Lite这两款手机都提供 5G,而且降价后价格已经相当实惠。

价格和供应情况

截至发稿时,配备 512GB 大容量存储的小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 可直接从制造商处购买。另外,感兴趣的用户也可以通过亚马逊订购Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G,价格约为 270 美元

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G - 05/03/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 70%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
31 / 64 → 49%
Application Performance
70 / 86 → 81%
Temperature
91%
Noise
0%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
71%
Average
74%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 智能手机评测--配备 AMOLED 显示屏和出色摄像头的中端手机
Florian Schmitt, 2024-05- 9 (Update: 2024-05- 9)