小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 智能手机评测--一款拥有超炫屏幕的现代中端手机

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Brand: Xiaomi

2 亿像素中档机。 小米广受欢迎的Redmi Note 系列又回来了，而且还提供了新的功能：例如，我们为Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 配备了 2 亿像素摄像头，支持 e-SIM 卡，如果需要的话，还能提供大量存储空间。我们的详细评测将揭示这款中端手机是否再次值得推荐购买。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 01/29/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G ARM Android Smartphone

2024 年，Redmi Note 系列将推出五款新车型：从 Redmi Note 13 4G到售价约 400 英镑的Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G。在过去几年中，Redmi Note 智能手机能够将自己定位为出色的中端替代产品。毕竟，你能以优惠的价格获得现代化的外壳、出色的摄像头和优质的 AMOLED 显示屏。

在本篇评测中，我们将对小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 进行评测，它是今年该系列中价格第二高的机型，制造商定价约为 340 英镑。与顶级机型相比，它的 SoC 处理速度稍慢、充电性能较低、非曲面显示屏以及防水防尘等级较低。

Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 还划算吗？

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Redmi Note 13 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 710

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 240Hz sampling rate, Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 200 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 161.2 x 74.3

Battery

5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 67-watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix f/1.65, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/omnidirectional), OIS, LED-flash, Videos @2160p/30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4, Videos @1080p/60fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), silicone bumper, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP54-certified, e-SIM support, fanless

Weight

187 g

Price

399 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
85.8 %	01/2024	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710	187 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220
85.4 %	04/2023	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4	187 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
84.6 %	10/2023	Motorola Edge 40 Neo Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3	170 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
83.1 %	09/2023	Sony Xperia 10 V SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	159 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.10"	2520x1080
82 %	05/2023	Honor Magic5 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	175 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

外壳 - 纤薄的边框将屏幕包围起来

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 的机身采用了平整的显示屏，边缘没有弯曲。机身手感良好，做工精致。边框由塑料制成，屏幕则由坚固的大猩猩玻璃 Victus 保护。

边框和机身背面有三种颜色可供选择：黑色、柔和的紫罗兰色或青绿色。我们的紫色评测样品采用了防指纹的磨砂玻璃后壳。表壳在承受压力时不会出汗，也不会扭曲。

在重量方面，与前代产品相比没有任何变化：该设备的重量仍为 187 克，但从尺寸上看，尽管显示屏大小不变，这款智能手机却变得更小巧了。这表明，小米成功地进一步缩小了前代产品已经很纤薄的显示屏边框。这让Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 看起来非常高端，尤其是对于这个价位的手机来说。

根据制造商的说法，该机具有 IP54 防尘防水功能，这比 Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G.不过，我们建议不要将设备浸入水中。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Motorola Edge 40 Neo Sony Xperia 10 V DIN A6 ❌

特点 - 有趣的细节

小米提供两种不同的内存版本，分别有上述三种颜色可供选择：

8GB内存/256GB大容量存储：339英镑
12GB内存/512GB大容量存储：399英镑

虽然我们使用的是 LPDDR4X 内存，但内存控制器还支持速度更快的 LPDDR5（最高 6400 MHz）。大容量存储器配备了 UFS 2.2 闪存，在这个价位的机型中应该能保证不错的速度。在 "性能 "部分，我们将对此进行更详细的介绍。

正如我们已经在许多小米设备上看到的那样，该机内置了红外爆破器。这意味着智能手机还可以用作许多其他设备的遥控器。额外的 3.5 毫米音频接口可以连接模拟耳机或扬声器。

USB-C 端口只能以 USB 2.0 的速度进行内部连接。手机未配备用于扩展内存的 microSD 读卡器，但相比之下，您可以使用 2 张 SIM 卡和一张 e-SIM 卡。

软件 - 大量臃肿软件和安全补丁

小米手机安装了自己的 MiUI 14 用户界面，该界面仍基于Android 13。截至 2024 年 1 月，安全更新一直是最新的。制造商承诺三年内提供Android 新版本，四年内提供安全补丁。

智能手机预装了大量应用程序。这意味着，开箱即用的设备存储空间已被占用近 50 GB。当然，你可以删除或隐藏许多第三方应用程序和小米程序，但这需要花费一些时间，然后才能享受一个相对纯净的系统。虽然经验丰富的用户不会喜欢在高级功能中内置许多安全问题，但这对新用户来说还是有意义的。

对于一款售价近 400 英镑的手机来说，小米不得不在自己的一些应用程序中插入广告，这一点很令人讨厌。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Wi-Fi 回归

WiFi 5 是最快的 Wi-Fi 标准，您可以用它将这款智能手机连接到无线网络。

与华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器搭配使用，测试速度不错，有时甚至比一些同价位的对比手机快得多。不过，前代产品由于支持 WiFi6，速度要快几百 MBit/s。正是在这方面，小米决定对我们的评测设备进行删减。

尽管如此，小米 Remi Note 13 5G 并不能完全发挥千兆网络连接的优势，但快速传输还是可行的。

在靠近路由器的地方，接收信号完全正常，网站加载速度也很快。如果距离路由器再远 10 米，中间隔着三堵墙，接收信号灯就会显示 3/4，网站加载速度也会明显变慢。

作为一款 5G 智能手机，Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 覆盖许多频率，这意味着该设备可以在大多数欧洲国家和更远的国家使用。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G	825 (790^min - 837^max) MBit/s +42%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=216, last 2 years)	646 MBit/s +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G	581 (491^min - 618^max) MBit/s
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G	357 (172^min - 378^max) MBit/s -39%
Sony Xperia 10 V	347 (332^min - 352^max) MBit/s -40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G	977 (487^min - 997^max) MBit/s +44%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=217, last 2 years)	685 MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G	678 (544^min - 711^max) MBit/s
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G	369 (337^min - 380^max) MBit/s -46%
Sony Xperia 10 V	363 (180^min - 378^max) MBit/s -46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)	1536 MBit/s
Motorola Edge 40 Neo	878 (686^min - 941^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)	1364 MBit/s
Motorola Edge 40 Neo	668 (436^min - 763^max) MBit/s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (491-618)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (544-711)

在定位方面，小米手机可与所有大型卫星网络进行通信，室外定位精度可达 3 米。

在实际测试中，我们希望了解小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 的定位精度，尤其是在移动过程中。例外的是，由于冰雪路面，我们这次是步行测试。我们的对比设备是 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表，它已经多次证明了自己的定位能力。

红米手机的表现也不差，大部分时间都能很好地跟踪我们的路线，只是偶尔会偏离轨道。您可以使用Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 进行导航，但肯定还有更精确的定位设备可供选择。

电话功能和语音质量 - 清晰锐利

小米使用谷歌的标准应用程序拨打电话，此外，它还在安全应用程序中提供设置，帮助用户阻止来电。

在通话过程中，接收器的声音非常清晰，我们说的话另一端也能清楚地接收到。不过，我们建议说话声音不要太小，否则麦克风很难正确再现声音。

通过扬声器和免提麦克风通话的质量同样很好。In this area, the receiver's voice isn't distorted, even at maximum volume and our voices could be heard clearly as long as we didn't speak too softly.

摄像头 - 200 万像素摄像头可拍摄出漂亮的照片

从纸面上看，后置 2 亿像素摄像头是小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 的亮点之一。

然而，它却很少发挥出全部潜能：通常情况下，只能拍摄出 1200 万像素的照片，这意味着三星的 Isocell HP3 传感器将 16 个像素合成一个像素，以实现更高的感光度。通过访问特殊模式可以使用最高分辨率，但相机会通知用户，良好的照明是必要的，而且数码变焦只能在非常有限的范围内使用，最高为 2 倍。

使用主摄像头以标准模式拍摄的照片当然可以更亮一些。但总的来说，对于这个价位的手机来说，照片的细节和虚化效果还是相当吸引人的。事实上，在弱光环境下也能获得很好的增亮效果。照片的清晰度相当不错，只有个别部分的画质有所下降。

主摄像头可拍摄 30fps 的 4K 视频和 60fps 的全高清视频。总之，拍摄效果很好，自动对焦反应快速准确，自适应亮度也能正常工作。

800 万像素广角摄像头拍摄的快照效果不错，但边缘清晰度有所下降。此外，还有一个分辨率很低的 200 万像素微距摄像头。

前置摄像头最大可拍摄 1600 万像素的照片。图像明亮细腻。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plant Main camera environment Main camera low light Wide-angle camera

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

Apple iPhone 15

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

Apple iPhone 15

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

Apple iPhone 15

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G

Apple iPhone 15

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

主摄像头也必须再次证明自己，这次是在测试实验室：在这种条件下，照片看起来很清晰，但图像某些区域的对比度可能会更高一些。虽然该相机在 1 lux 下也能拍出不错的照片，但色彩明显偏暗。

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G: 7.62 ∆E min: 2.78 - max: 13.64 ∆E

附件和保修 - 附带快速充电器

小米并没有妥协，除了相应的 68 瓦充电器外，还配备了 USB-C 数据线、SIM 卡工具和硅胶保护套。

在欧洲，制造商的设备提供 24 个月的保修.

输入设备和操作 - 便捷的触摸屏

120 Hz 的显示屏具有 240 Hz 的触摸屏采样率，因此智能手机的操作体验非常流畅。即使在边边角角，显示屏也能对输入做出迅速反应，机壳右侧的硬件按键也非常可靠。

指纹传感器位于显示屏下方，只要在待机模式下移动手机，相应区域就会突出显示。经过一次性指纹设置后，解锁过程不会出现延迟，非常可靠。人脸识别功能设置迅速，运行无误。

显示屏 - 非常明亮的 OLED 屏幕

长期以来，高品质的 AMOLED 显示屏一直是小米中端产品的标志之一，与此同时，其他制造商也纷纷效仿。

尽管如此，小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 的 AMOLED 显示屏还是很特别。尤其是它的高亮度水平，在全白屏幕上可达 1,205 cd/m²，而在较小的区域可达 1,345 cd/m²。这使得 HDR 内容能在面板上得到很好的显示。

对于喜欢在床上使用智能手机阅读的人来说，较低的屏幕亮度可以保护他们免受耀眼图像的影响。


1105 cd/m²	1153 cd/m²	1231 cd/m²
1126 cd/m²	1205 cd/m²	1211 cd/m²
1164 cd/m²	1189 cd/m²	1205 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 1231 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1176.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 1205 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.175

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67	Motorola Edge 40 Neo pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Sony Xperia 10 V OLED, 2520x1080, 6.10	Honor Magic5 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen		21%	-10%	13%	3%
Brightness middle	1205	938 -22%	966 -20%	933 -23%	846 -30%
Brightness	1177	939 -20%	957 -19%	944 -20%	853 -28%
Brightness Distribution	90	96 7%	97 8%	97 8%	88 -2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.51	0.9 40%	1.87 -24%	1.1 27%	1.3 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.07	1.6 61%	4.34 -7%	1.7 58%	2.7 34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1 60%	2.5 -0%	1.8 28%	1.7 32%
Gamma	2.175 ^101%	2.25 ^98%	2.272 ^97%	2.29 ^96%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6407 ^101%	6350 ^102%	6582 ^99%	6611 ^98%	6570 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

713.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 713.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 713.5 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行一系列测量

在低亮度下，我们检测到明显的 PWM 闪烁，测量结果为 713.5 Hz。这是一个非常高的频率，应该可以保护大多数用户免受问题困扰。不过，小米再次提到了高达 1,920 Hz 的频率。与前代产品一样，我们无法使用测量设备进行测量。

显示屏的响应速度非常快，在使用 "标准 "模式时，色彩还原也非常顺眼，与最佳情况的偏差很小。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.65 ms rise
1.33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.68 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.78 ms rise
1.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.71 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

在户外，即使在非常明亮的环境中，智能手机也能达到很高的亮度，而且通常能可靠地显示屏幕内容。

如果从很宽的角度观察显示屏，图像完全清晰可辨，对比度也很高。

性能--微不足道的升级

高通高通骁龙 7s 第二代最近推出的 SoC 与去年的骁龙 7 代 1.

在我们的基准测试中，该处理器大多能在价格相近的对比设备中保持领先地位，而Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 的速度通常要比上一代产品快一些。至于在日常使用中是否能真正注意到这种差异，还有待商榷。无论如何，我们的评测设备使用起来非常流畅，也能为要求更高的应用程序提供足够的动力。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=220, last 2 years)	911 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	789 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	783 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	783 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	765 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	669 Points -15%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	666 Points -15%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=220, last 2 years)	2988 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	2678 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	2678 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	2197 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	2035 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1921 Points -28%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1891 Points -29%

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=105, last 2 years)	1390 Points +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	1029 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	1029 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	904 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	893 Points -13%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=105, last 2 years)	3840 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	2955 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	2955 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	2214 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2111 Points -29%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)	738503 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	518499 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	518499 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	510541 Points -2%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	391186 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	Points -100%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	15195 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	12967 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	12967 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)	11771 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	11763 Points -9%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	10071 Points -22%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7933 Points -39%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	5056 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	5056 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	4189 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	4152 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3655 Points -28%
System
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	10410 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	10410 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7953 Points -24%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	7550 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	6684 Points -36%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	5938 Points +29%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	5742 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	4595 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	4595 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4146 Points -10%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	7168 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	7168 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	5178 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	5093 Points -29%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4376 Points -39%
Web
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	1905 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	1905 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	1521 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points -22%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	1324 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1237 Points -35%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	22528 Points +161%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	21997 Points +155%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points +153%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	8618 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	8618 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5442 Points -37%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)	17833 Points +2481%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 1080, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	8784 Points +1171%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3, 12288	8006 Points +1059%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192	691 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	691 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	445 Points -36%

在图形性能方面，新的 Adreno 710取得了不错的性能成绩，使Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 在同类设备中冲刺到了前列。要求苛刻的基准测试也能在全高清条件下流畅运行，但芯片组的功率不足以支持更高分辨率。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	788 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	693 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	632 Points -20%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	353 Points -55%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	352 Points -55%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	800 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	698 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	643 Points -20%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	360 Points -55%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	358 Points -55%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3046 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2583 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2287 Points -25%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1199 Points -61%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1198 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3039 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2593 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2273 Points -25%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1209 Points -60%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points -60%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2998 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2763 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2711 Points -10%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4914 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4272 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4198 Points -15%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4303 Points
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3787 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3784 Points -12%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4411 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4053 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3852 Points
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3537 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3512 Points -9%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5455 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4387 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4258 Points -22%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3001 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2990 Points -45%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4993 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4362 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4211 Points -16%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3106 Points -38%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3092 Points -38%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	90 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps -29%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps -34%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	120 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	106 fps -12%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps -22%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	54 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -26%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps -52%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	46 fps +44%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	32 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +16%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -16%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps -7%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -10%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -7%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -20%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps -27%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -8%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12 fps -8%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps -37%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.1 fps -38%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -17%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps -22%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -17%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -37%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -37%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.8 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5.3 fps -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.7 fps -19%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps -38%

在上网方面，红米手机的表现也令人印象深刻：网页加载速度非常快，而且在大多数情况下，滚动时图片已经加载完毕。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	117.3 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)	117.292 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	102.38 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	78.167 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	71.873 Points -39%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +21%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	91.6 runs/min +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)	88.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	88.2 runs/min 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	72 runs/min -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	62.9 runs/min -29%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)	115 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	115 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	106 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)	100.2 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	71 Points -38%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	67 Points -42%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)	35379 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	35379 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	34140 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years)	33357 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	31662 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	28902 Points -18%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G (Chrome 112)	22847 Points -35%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G (Chrome 111)	1766.4 ms * -51%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * -36%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	1388 ms * -19%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo (Chrome 118)	1299.1 ms * -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ()	1171 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G (Chrome 120)	1170.6 ms *

* ... smaller is better

同样，UFS 2.2 存储在小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 的同价位产品中也属于最快的。这缩短了加载和数据传输时间，复制任务也能快速执行。

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G	Motorola Edge 40 Neo	Sony Xperia 10 V	Honor Magic5 Lite 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		5%	17%	-38%	-39%	-6%	31%
Sequential Read 256KB	946.8	1008.8 7%	1004.4 6%	444.54 -53%	486.17 -49%	892 ?(482 - 1009, n=22) -6%	1506 ?(226 - 4512, n=219, last 2 years) 59%
Sequential Write 256KB	808.2	865.59 7%	930.9 15%	438.02 -46%	420.44 -48%	690 ?(369 - 913, n=22) -15%	1115 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=219, last 2 years) 38%
Random Read 4KB	239.2	241.83 1%	279.5 17%	175.72 -27%	171.13 -28%	219 ?(99.7 - 291, n=22) -8%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=219, last 2 years) 3%
Random Write 4KB	220.5	234.21 6%	284.1 29%	165.15 -25%	149.12 -32%	230 ?(99.2 - 301, n=22) 4%	271 ?(13 - 709, n=219, last 2 years) 23%

游戏 - 有时为 60fps

我们还在红米智能手机上下载了一些游戏，看看它们的运行效果如何。该设备在所有设置下都无法达到 60fps，同样，也很难达到更高的帧率。

不过，如果你能降低期望值并选择较低的图形设置，那么《PUBG Mobile》和《源氏冲击》都能以相对流畅的 60fps 运行。相比之下，虽然《暗黑破坏神永生不朽》在所有设置下的帧数都被限制在 30fps，但运行起来确实很流畅。我们使用GameBench 软件测量了帧率。

触摸屏和体感控制都能完美运行。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.3.0_19705728_19706476: Ø58.1 (51-60)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.3.0_19705728_19706476: Ø39.3 (29-52)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.0.0: Ø59.7 (55-60)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.0.0: Ø39.7 (37-41)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.2.1: Ø30 (28-32)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.2.1: Ø29.9 (27-32)

排放 -Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 没有节流功能

温度

在较长时间的高负载情况下，小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 会明显发热，但最高温度为 43.4 °C，废热并不严重。

在较长的负载时间内，这款智能手机在保持性能方面也没有表现出任何问题：在 3DMark 压力测试中运行 20 次后，我们看到的分数与开始时记录的分数非常相似。

Max. Load

Idle


43.4 °C	39.7 °C	37.6 °C
43.3 °C	42.9 °C	37.1 °C
43.2 °C	39.8 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 40.4 °C


35.4 °C	38.4 °C	41.1 °C
35 °C	39 °C	42.9 °C
35.3 °C	38.3 °C	42.5 °C

Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 38.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.8 % 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 %
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.3 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.7 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 % -1%
Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.7 % -1%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.75 (4.74-4.76)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.79 (3.79-3.8)

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.17 (4.16-4.18)

Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.17)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.1 (18.1-18.2)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.6-13.7)

Motorola Edge 40 Neo Mali-G610 MP3, Dimensity 7030, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.4 (15.4-15.5)

Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.21 (7.2-7.22)

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.0.2: Ø7.21 (7.2-7.21)

发言人

红米手机的扬声器由底部边缘和耳机区域的专用扬声器组成。总而言之，它的音质可以用良好和均衡来形容，没有打破任何记录。即使在最大音量下，声音也不会被过度调制。

听古典音乐时，你可以分辨出各个乐器。播放流行音乐时，人声清晰可辨，观看电影时也很容易理解演员的表演，不过如果能增加一些音效就更好了。This is where you notice the smartphone's small speaker lacks bass.

如果想获得更好的音效，可以考虑通过 3.5 毫米接口或蓝牙 5.2 连接耳机或扬声器。该设备或多或少拥有目前所有的音频编码，例如 LHDC 或 aptX HD 等高保真编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电快，续航能力强

耗电量

在能效方面，小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 处于中等水平：基本耗电量略高，而平均负载耗电量则相当低。在满功率状态下，智能手机会很快耗尽电池。

为了给电池充电，手机附带了一个 67 瓦的充电器。这样，手机最多可在 45 分钟内充满电。红米手机不带无线充电功能。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1.3 / 1.4 / 1.6 Watt
Load	2.5 / 9.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 5100 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 Neo 5000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 V 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-15%	-11%	11%	0%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	1.3	0.99 24%	1 23%	0.56 57%	1.3 ?() -0%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Average *	1.4	2.03 -45%	1.2 14%	0.91 35%	1.4 ?() -0%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -4%
Idle Maximum *	1.6	2.08 -30%	1.3 19%	0.98 39%	1.6 ?() -0%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -2%
Load Average *	2.5	3.97 -59%	5.2 -108%	5.34 -114%	2.5 ?() -0%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -122%
Load Maximum *	9.1	5.85 36%	9.2 -1%	5.46 40%	9.1 ?() -0%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.95 (1.383-9.14)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

Power consumption: Idle (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G: Ø1.607 (1.531-2.56)

电池寿命

与前代产品相比，这款手机的电池容量略有增大，达到 5100 毫安时。在我们进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中，在调节显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的情况下，这足以支持 16 小时 42 分钟的运行时间。

不过，在负载情况下，这款智能手机的效率实际上不如同价位的其他竞争手机：尽管如此，玩游戏或运行要求很高的应用程序仍可持续 5 小时。

在日常使用中，电池续航能力总体良好，尤其是充电速度快，这意味着你没有理由担心电池会耗尽。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 46min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 07min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 5100 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 Neo 5000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 V 5000 mAh	Honor Magic5 Lite 5G 5100 mAh
Battery Runtime		-6%	12%	53%	-19%
Reader / Idle	1786	1598 -11%	2444 37%	4067 128%
H.264	1142	1043 -9%	1232 8%	1615 41%
WiFi v1.3	1002	978 -2%	864 -14%	1157 15%	816 -19%
Load	307	299 -3%	355 16%	388 26%

Pros

+ 非常明亮和精确的 AMOLED

+ 轻巧现代的外壳

+ 如有需要，还可提供大容量存储空间

+ 支持 e-SIM 卡

+ 良好的功能设置，包括红外爆破器

+ 主摄像头拍照效果不错

+ 通话清晰

+ 良好的定位功能

+ 电池寿命长

+ 快速充电

+ 快速指纹传感器

Cons

- 大量预装软件

- 没有完整的防水保护

- 塑料边框

- Wi-Fi速度低于前代产品

- PWM 屏幕闪烁

- 没有无线充电功能

结论 - 中端智能手机仅有小缺点

2024 年伊始，小米公司（XiaomiRedmi Note 13 Pro 5G）已经为中端智能手机设定了更高的标准：目前，很难在其他地方找到如此明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏和高分辨率摄像头。

轻巧的机身和纤薄的边框令人眼前一亮，而大猩猩玻璃Victus则保护了显示屏免受损坏。丰富的存储选项（最高 512 GB UFS 2.2 闪存）、3.5 毫米音频插孔接口和红外闪光灯也（仍然）是这个价位段的特别之处。

今年小米中端手机支持 e-SIM 卡也是一件好事。不过，与去年的机型相比，Wi-Fi 网速明显较慢，这一点令人遗憾。

软件方面也是喜忧参半：好消息是，小米扩大了更新政策，在我们进行评测时，这款智能手机已经安装了最新的安全补丁。不过，我们不禁要问，在自己的程序中预装几十个第三方应用程序是否真的有必要？

主摄像头能拍出不错的照片，自拍效果也很好。同样，这款手机的定位精度也可以接受，语音质量也不错。

尽管采用了塑料外壳，但小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 是一款高端中端智能手机，没有任何真正的弱点。

小米小米Redmi Note 12 Pro 5G12 Pro 5G 的前代产品几乎没有什么缺点，但在评测时却便宜了 150 多英镑。凭借更快的显示屏和 W-Fi 无线网络，摩托罗拉 Edge 40 Neo 也是中端智能手机中的佼佼者。摩托罗拉 Edge 40 Neo也令人印象深刻。

价格和供应情况

目前，在英国亚马逊（amazon.uk）上可以买到配备 256 GB 大容量存储空间的小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G，售价为 299 英镑（亚马逊独家销售）。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G - 2024-01-23 01/23/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

85%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

52 / 70 → 74%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

93%

Games Performance

49 / 64 → 77%

Application Performance

78 / 86 → 91%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

69 / 90 → 77%

Camera

75%

Average

79%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 88 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 390192 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 智能手机评测--一款拥有超炫屏幕的现代中端手机

Florian Schmitt, 2024-01-29 (Update: 2024-01-29)

小米Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 智能手机评测--一款拥有超炫屏幕的现代中端手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 纤薄的边框将屏幕包围起来

尺寸比较

特点 - 有趣的细节

软件 - 大量臃肿软件和安全补丁

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Wi-Fi 回归

电话功能和语音质量 - 清晰锐利

摄像头 - 200 万像素摄像头可拍摄出漂亮的照片

附件和保修 - 附带快速充电器

输入设备和操作 - 便捷的触摸屏

显示屏 - 非常明亮的 OLED 屏幕

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能--微不足道的升级

游戏 - 有时为 60fps

排放 -Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G 没有节流功能

温度

3DMark Wild Life stress test

发言人

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G audio analysis

Honor Magic5 Lite 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 充电快，续航能力强

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: Idle (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 中端智能手机仅有小缺点

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare