Notebookcheck

华为 P10 智能手机简短评测

Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), 04/08/2017
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

请下一位! 十大于九——华为在P10的设计中很好地实现了这个理念。更快的处理器,更大存储空间,更大电池容量,还有更优秀的相机。它的设计更加圆润,指纹识别器也移到了机身正面。尽管没有重要革新,但华为P10没有暴露出明显的弱点。

Huawei P10 (P10 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memory
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Display
5.1 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 432 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕,10点触控,指关节触控, LTPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 49.66 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最高支持 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距感应器,霍尔感应器,加速感应器,位置和重力感应器,计步器,数字指南针, BeiDou, OTG, Wifi Direct, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (频段 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 12 (频段 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 38, 40 和 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.98 x 145.3 x 69.3
Battery
3200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 华为 SuperCharge, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 23 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 359 h
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix 2000万像素黑白 + 1200万像素RGB 徕卡双镜头 (Summarit-H 1:2.2/27毫米 ASPH, 整合变焦, 混合自动对焦, 光学防抖, 4K视频录制, 双色温LED闪光灯)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 徕卡镜头 (定焦)
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,USB数据线,耳机,保护套,SIM卡工具,快速开始说明,质保卡, EMUI 5.1, 36 Months Warranty, USB-C, head SAR: 1.49 W/kg, body SAR: 0.54 W/kg, fanless
Weight
144 g, Power Supply: 102 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

148.9 mm 71.9 mm 7.9 mm 163 g146 mm 72 mm 8.1 mm 161 g145.3 mm 69.3 mm 6.98 mm 144 g145 mm 70.9 mm 6.95 mm 144 g142.4 mm 69.6 mm 7.9 mm 152 g138.3 mm 67.1 mm 7.1 mm 138 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s ∼100% +73%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (min: 48.8) MBit/s ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼53% -9%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s ∼52% -9%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s ∼100% +41%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 154) MBit/s ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼69% -2%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s ∼38% -46%
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Huawei P10
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Food mode saturates colors too strongly
The robin can hardly be recognized with the x10 zoom
Ship: without zoom
Ship: x2 zoom
Ship: x10 zoom
20 MP (monochrome)
20 MP (monochrome)
20 MP (standard)
20 MP (standard)
12 MP (RGB, standard)
12 MP (RGB, standard)
12 MP (soft colors)
12 MP (soft colors)
12 MP (vivid colors)
12 MP (vivid colors)
12 MP (x2 zoom)
12 MP (x2 zoom)
12 MP (x5.5 zoom)
12 MP (x5.5 zoom)
12 MP (x10 zoom)
12 MP (x10 zoom)
12 MP (RGB, standard)
12 MP (RGB, standard)
20 MP (monochrome)
20 MP (standard)
12 MP (soft colors)
12 MP (vivid colors)
12 MP (x2 zoom)
12 MP (x5.5 zoom)
12 MP (x10 zoom)
602
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 604 cd/m² Average: 556.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.39 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 547 cd/m²
Contrast: 1272:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
Gamma: 2.39
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P8
IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
Apple iPhone 7
IPS, 1334x750, 4.7
Sony Xperia XZ
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2
Screen
8%
3%
21%
31%
-8%
9%
Brightness middle
547
582
6%
453
-17%
350
-36%
556
2%
544
-1%
445
-19%
Brightness
556
563
1%
439
-21%
351
-37%
519
-7%
521
-6%
434
-22%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
91
6%
98
14%
90
5%
93
8%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.43
0.38
12%
0.28
35%
0.34
21%
0.37
14%
0.36
16%
Contrast
1272
1532
20%
1618
27%
1635
29%
1470
16%
1236
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.8
4.4
8%
4.7
2%
2.04
57%
1.3
73%
5.8
-21%
2.8
42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.8
7.4
16%
3.25
63%
2.6
70%
9.8
-11%
5.8
34%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.8
-7%
5.03
-12%
1.63
64%
1.9
58%
7.2
-60%
3.7
18%
Gamma
2.39 92%
2.2 100%
2.27 97%
2.07 106%
2.26 97%
2.18 101%
2.31 95%
CCT
7194 90%
6175 105%
7439 87%
6391 102%
6818 95%
8619 75%
7164 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.78
72.04
86.86
63.15
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.44
99.35
99.71

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼48%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼33% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼44% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼49% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼44% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ
129317 Points ∼44% -8%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼45% -6%
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points ∼42% -11%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼54% +14%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
6036 Points ∼15%
Huawei P9
4904 Points ∼12% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼13% -9%
Apple iPhone 7
5585 Points ∼14% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼10% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ
3701 Points ∼9% -39%
Huawei Mate 9
5629 Points ∼14% -7%
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼10% -30%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
1935 Points ∼31%
Huawei P9
1755 Points ∼28% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼29% -5%
Apple iPhone 7
3490 Points ∼55% +80%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼23% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ
1647 Points ∼26% -15%
Huawei Mate 9
1947 Points ∼31% +1%
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼30% -3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼38%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼50% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼43% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼36% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼33% -12%
HTC 10
1688 Points ∼34% -11%
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points ∼42% +11%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼35% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼28%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼10% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼26% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼28% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ
2853 Points ∼34% +18%
HTC 10
2889 Points ∼34% +20%
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points ∼27% -5%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼29% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼11%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼5% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼11% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼11% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ
2548 Points ∼13% +12%
HTC 10
2495 Points ∼12% +10%
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points ∼11% -1%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼11% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼43%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼50% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼40% -9%
Apple iPhone 7
1525 Points ∼30% -30%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼36% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ
1667 Points ∼33% -24%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼30% -31%
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points ∼42% -3%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼29% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼23%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼9% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼24% +7%
Apple iPhone 7
4057 Points ∼33% +44%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼30% +32%
Sony Xperia XZ
4522 Points ∼36% +61%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼37% +63%
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points ∼20% -13%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼27% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼29%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼14% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼30% +2%
Apple iPhone 7
2964 Points ∼32% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼33% +14%
Sony Xperia XZ
3275 Points ∼36% +24%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼35% +19%
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points ∼26% -11%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼28% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼18%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼18% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼23% +28%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼18% +1%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼24% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ
20772 Points ∼24% +35%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼24% +33%
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points ∼17% -2%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼26% +46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼7%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼4% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼6% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼12% +78%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼5% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ
32056 Points ∼6% -11%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼6% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points ∼7% -1%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼6% -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼12%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼8% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼12% +4%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼16% +36%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼11% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ
28603 Points ∼12% +3%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼11% -2%
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points ∼12% -1%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼13% +11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼0% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼1% +17%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼1% +60%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼1% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼1% +28%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼1% +6%
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps ∼1% +16%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼1% +32%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼2%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼1% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼2% -7%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼2% +5%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼2% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ
88 fps ∼3% +60%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼1% -22%
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps ∼2% +9%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼2% +7%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼5%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼3% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼6% +27%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼10% +102%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼7% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ
40 fps ∼6% +33%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼6% +30%
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps ∼5% +13%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼7% +53%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼9%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼5% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼7% -16%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼16% +83%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ
39 fps ∼11% +22%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼7% -25%
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps ∼10% +16%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼12% +41%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼0% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼1% +17%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼1% +76%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼1% +13%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼1% +29%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps ∼1% 0%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼1% +33%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼1%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼0% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼0% -40%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼2% +138%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼0% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ
31 fps ∼1% +24%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼0% -44%
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps ∼1% +12%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼1% +28%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
6206 Points ∼50%
Huawei P9
5226 Points ∼42% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ
5616 Points ∼46% -10%
HTC 10
4549 Points ∼37% -27%
Huawei Mate 9
6299 Points ∼51% +1%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼37%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼36% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼24% -37%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼39% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ
5058 Points ∼26% -31%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼30% -21%
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points ∼38% +1%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼29% -23%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼53%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼51% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼49% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points ∼75% +42%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼47% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼52% -1%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼46% -14%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼44% -17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼14%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼5% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼8% -46%
Apple iPhone 7
6896 Points ∼24% +68%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼15% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ
4716 Points ∼16% +15%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼17% +22%
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points ∼14% -4%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼15% +8%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼35%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼33% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼26% -25%
Apple iPhone 7
1257 Points ∼16% -55%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼28% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ
1434 Points ∼18% -48%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼22% -36%
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points ∼48% +39%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼25% -30%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼23%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼24% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼25% +7%
Apple iPhone 7
6097 Points ∼37% +59%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼21% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ
3047 Points ∼19% -20%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼17% -27%
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points ∼22% -6%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼19% -18%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼31%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼24% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼25% -21%
Apple iPhone 7
2999 Points ∼35% +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼28% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ
2165 Points ∼26% -17%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼26% -16%
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points ∼33% +6%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼26% -15%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P10
23.56 fps ∼61%
Huawei P9
7.9 fps ∼20% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps ∼34% -44%
Lenovo Moto Z
24.33 fps ∼63% +3%
Huawei Mate 9
19.14 fps ∼49% -19%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
664 Points ∼12%
Huawei P9
328 Points ∼6% -51%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points ∼13% +10%
Apple iPhone 7
1322 Points ∼23% +99%
Apple iPhone 7
1059 Points ∼19% +59%
Lenovo Moto Z
542 Points ∼9% -18%
HTC 10
608 Points ∼11% -8%
Huawei Mate 9
699 Points ∼12% +5%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei P10
60.5 fps ∼98%
Huawei P9
58.6 fps ∼95% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
60 fps ∼97% -1%
Lenovo Moto Z
59.8 fps ∼97% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
60.5 fps ∼98% 0%

Legend

 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
136 Points ∼17%
Huawei P9
128 Points ∼16% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points ∼20% +20%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼25% +49%
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points ∼14% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ
90 Points ∼11% -34%
HTC 10
108 Points ∼13% -21%
Huawei Mate 9
152 Points ∼19% +12%
OnePlus 3T
135 Points ∼17% -1%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼53%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼51% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼49% -8%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points ∼75% +42%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼47% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ
1066 Points ∼52% -1%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼46% -14%
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼44% -17%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
10236 Points ∼20%
Huawei P9
11783 Points ∼22% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points ∼25% +29%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼47% +143%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼15% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ
9069 Points ∼17% -11%
HTC 10
8905 Points ∼17% -13%
Huawei Mate 9
11897 Points ∼23% +16%
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points ∼19% -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
3128.7 ms * ∼5%
Huawei P9
2922.6 ms * ∼5% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564.1 ms * ∼4% +18%
Apple iPhone 7
1113.4 ms * ∼2% +64%
Lenovo Moto Z
3154.7 ms * ∼5% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ
2768 ms * ∼5% +12%
HTC 10
3146.3 ms * ∼5% -1%
Huawei Mate 9
2733.7 ms * ∼5% +13%
OnePlus 3T
2719.3 ms * ∼5% +13%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10
57.9 Points ∼16%
Huawei P9
68.4 Points ∼19% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.12 Points ∼21% +30%
Apple iPhone 7
165.86 Points ∼47% +186%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼14% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ
54.201 Points ∼15% -6%
HTC 10
52.1 Points ∼15% -10%
Huawei Mate 9
68.6 Points ∼20% +18%
OnePlus 3T
54.526 Points ∼16% -6%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei P10
7346 Points ∼97%
Huawei P9
6580 (min: 6523) Points ∼87% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7198 (min: 6255) Points ∼95% -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
5344 Points ∼71% -27%
Huawei Mate 9
7565 Points ∼100% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P10Huawei P9Lenovo Moto ZSony Xperia XZHTC 10Samsung Galaxy S7LG G5ZTE Axon 7
AndroBench 3-5
-49%
-8%
-48%
-20%
-16%
-20%
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
32.19
24.83
-23%
45.64
42%
29.8
-7%
65.44
103%
53.6
67%
45.53
41%
51.34
59%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54.22
55.05
2%
78.51
45%
33.5
-38%
83.3
54%
72.33
33%
78.53
45%
78.39
45%
Random Write 4KB
152.31
47.45
-69%
74.93
-51%
10.5
-93%
15.89
-90%
16.01
-89%
16.22
-89%
16.22
-89%
Random Read 4KB
168.42
39
-77%
117.15
-30%
71.5
-58%
29.92
-82%
85.9
-49%
89.26
-47%
121.07
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB
189.83
72.19
-62%
168.32
-11%
138
-27%
115.56
-39%
145.72
-23%
141.26
-26%
150.92
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB
737.65
281.26
-62%
439.66
-40%
281
-62%
275.09
-63%
483.82
-34%
427.65
-42%
406.49
-45%
Max. Load
 44.6 °C43.1 °C43 °C 
 43.9 °C43.1 °C43.6 °C 
 42.6 °C41.6 °C42.6 °C 
Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 43.1 °C
37.3 °C38.4 °C40.9 °C
37.2 °C39.6 °C40.5 °C
37.8 °C39.4 °C40.7 °C
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 39.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.639.92525.439.83125.339.74032.934.75033.634.76331.632.78028.427.81002726.412520.828.61602241.520021.350.525020.855.931521.260.340019.46550019.568.663017.766.880017.964.4100017.866.9125017.371.5160017.473.5200016.774.5250017.273.7315018.272.2400017.970.5500017.670.7630017.764.8800017.860.41000017.9591250018.148.41600018.232.8SPL3082.7N1.352.3median 17.9median 64.8Delta1.310.629.635.529.628.529.528.526.328.226.329.631.529.627.927.427.925.125.725.124.729.424.733.831.333.843.732.143.742.620.442.64620.84647.920.247.950.419.750.451.922.351.960.820.160.866.318.966.367.517.767.567.116.767.166.91766.97014.87072.915.972.965.914.665.971.514.471.574.714.174.774.813.874.873.413.773.472.613.872.662.313.762.355.213.755.255.113.655.183.128.683.154.11.254.1median 65.9median 16.7median 65.910.53.410.540.632.932.440.641.629.831.341.634.532.131.734.538.140.92638.134.437.839.434.425.627.836.225.629.727.928.629.733.127.525.433.134.924.821.334.941.320.623.341.34526.122.54552.531.322.452.557.837.821.357.859.639.918.459.663.445.417.563.469.950.817.569.971.553.117.271.572.255.216.872.274.757.817.374.774.957.717.474.977.959.416.677.980.361.817.380.380.760.817.680.776.154.717.676.175.954.617.775.979.760.517.479.773.354.317.773.367.849.717.967.866.847.718.166.858.133.518.158.188.769.729.888.773.823.11.373.8median 69.9median 50.8median 17.7median 69.99.911.71.69.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P10Apple iPhone 7Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.06 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.83 / 2.1 / 2.18 Watt
Load midlight 6.57 / 9.32 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3200 mAh
Power Consumption
16%
8%
34%
36%
-1%
20%
Idle Minimum *
0.83
0.77
7%
0.68
18%
0.68
18%
0.54
35%
1.31
-58%
0.4
52%
Idle Average *
2.1
2.36
-12%
1.49
29%
1.02
51%
1.51
28%
2.03
3%
1.7
19%
Idle Maximum *
2.18
2.37
-9%
1.91
12%
1.14
48%
1.54
29%
2.08
5%
1.81
17%
Load Average *
6.57
3.09
53%
7.4
-13%
4.73
28%
3.75
43%
5.45
17%
5.84
11%
Load Maximum *
9.32
5.35
43%
9.71
-4%
7.16
23%
5.01
46%
6.75
28%
9.12
2%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 40min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 56min
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Lenovo ZUK Z2
3500 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
14%
-9%
-12%
-43%
9%
Reader / Idle
1540
1514
-2%
1810
18%
1770
15%
1273
-17%
1371
-11%
H.264
582
568
-2%
892
53%
722
24%
648
11%
724
24%
WiFi v1.3
966
569
-41%
456
-53%
517
-46%
413
-57%
546
-43%
407
-58%
Load
176
206
17%
242
38%
126
-28%
203
15%
320
82%

Pros

+ 经典设计,高品质材料
+ 高速处理器
+ 大容量UFS 2.1闪存
+ 高速LTE Cat.12支持,频段覆盖广
+ 支持混合变焦的优秀相机
+ 不错的电池续航
+ 可扩展存储空间
+ 不错的扬声器
+ 最长3年质保
+ 快速充电
+ 优秀的屏幕...

Cons

- ...但很遗憾分辨率仅1080p
- 屏幕机身面积比有所退步
- 预装软件过多
- 无线模组ac制式速度慢
- microSD读卡器速度慢
- 不支持MHL或SlimPort
- 负载下降频
In review: Huawei P10 (VTR-L09). Review sample courtesy of Huawei.
In review: Huawei P10 (VTR-L09). Review sample courtesy of Huawei.

华为再一次带来了一款出色的产品,P10智能手机几乎无懈可击。和它同系列的P10 Plus版本才是真正的旗舰机型。不过,这款尺寸稍小的型号也搭载了一些一流的功能,如UFS 2.1闪存,LTE Cat.12网络模组,和极速Kirin 960处理器,配置相似的设备价位都相对更高。

我们也十分喜欢它的徕卡双镜头相机,尽管在技术上它还有改进的空间,不过已经可以拍摄品质超高的照片。内置的人像模式十分优秀,可以提供独特的景深效果。它的电池续航也得到了改进。

华为P10是一台成功的更新,优秀的相机和改进的电池续航都可以让人心服口服。

不过,考虑到它是一台高端设备,华为P10还有一些技术上的小瑕疵。相对较弱的无线网络模组,缓慢的microSD读卡器和仅全高清的屏幕都不太符合P10的价位。索尼今年已经搭配了超高清屏幕和HDR功能,而LG G6也得到了支持HDR的屏幕。华为需要在下次更新时提供这些功能。

在用户服务方面,华为也做的很好。VIP服务可以将质保延长到三年,这不仅为用户提供了方便,也显示出了华为对自家设备品质的信心。华为再一次带来了一款优势众多的高端智能手机,很好地延续了前代机型的优秀表现。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Huawei P10 - 07/11/2017 v6(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 94%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
51 / 60 → 84%
Weight
93%
Battery
95%
Display
87%
Games Performance
58 / 63 → 92%
Application Performance
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
78%
Average
80%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 P10 智能手机简短评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2017-04- 8 (Update: 2017-04- 8)