Notebookcheck Logo

小米 Mi 5s 智能手机简短评测

它很特别? 去年,小米Mi 5智能手机非凡的性价比而给我们留下了深刻印象。这次,我们将看看续作Mi 5s,它带有更多存储、坚固的金属外壳和更好的功能。它拥有时下最快的处理器:骁龙SoC。
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen
Xiaomi Mi 5s (Mi Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 4 x 2.15 GHz, Kryo
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Core: 624 MHz
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4
Display
5.15 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 428 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 119 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米耳麦插口, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度传感器,陀螺仪,霍尔效应传感器,接近传感器,罗盘,气压计, Miracast, DLNA, USB-OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), TD-SCDMA: (Bänder: 34/39), LTE: (Bänder 1/3/5/7/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.25 x 145.6 x 70.3
Battery
12.1 Wh, 3200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Quickcharge 3.0
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix autofocus f/2.0, 2160p video @ 30 fps, Sony IMX 378
Secondary Camera: 4 MPix fixed focus f/2.0, 1080p video @ 30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: 底部单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, 电源适配器,数据线, MIUI8, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
145 g, Power Supply: 65 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front
Front
Front
Back
Back
Front
Mi 5s - front & back
VR goggles
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s +79%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s +24%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s +15%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
Adreno 530, SD 821, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
271 MBit/s
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s -32%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s -59%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s +71%
Xiaomi Mi 5s
Adreno 530, SD 821, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
312 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s -10%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s -11%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s -18%
Lenovo Moto Z Play
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s -61%
Garmin Edge 500 - test track
Garmin Edge 500 - test track
Garmin Edge 500 - details
Garmin Edge 500 - details
Xiaomi Mi 5s - test track
Xiaomi Mi 5s - test track
Xiaomi Mi 5s - details
Xiaomi Mi 5s - details
Photo of the ColorChecker chart; the lower half of each patch shows the original color.
Photo of the ColorChecker chart; the lower half of each patch shows the original color.
Excerpt of the test chart
Excerpt of the test chart
Test chart (click for the original)
Test chart (click for the original)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
570
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
585
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
588
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 627 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 595.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 593 cd/m²
Contrast: 1045:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.26
Xiaomi Mi 5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.10
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.20
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.20
Xiaomi Mi 5
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
Screen
Brightness middle
627
350
-44%
421
-33%
582
-7%
445
-29%
598
-5%
Brightness
596
351
-41%
430
-28%
563
-6%
434
-27%
566
-5%
Brightness Distribution
91
98
8%
84
-8%
91
0%
93
2%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.6
0.38
37%
0.36
40%
0.51
15%
Contrast
1045
1532
47%
1236
18%
1173
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.5
2.04
55%
7.1
-58%
4.4
2%
2.8
38%
3.5
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.5
3.25
57%
15.3
-104%
7.4
1%
5.8
23%
6.1
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
1.63
64%
6.8
-51%
4.8
-7%
3.7
18%
3.5
22%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
2.23 99%
2.2 100%
2.31 95%
2.29 96%
CCT
7427 88%
6391 102%
7866 83%
6175 105%
7164 91%
6532 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
86.86
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.35
99.44

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2273 Hz ≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
148698 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points -14%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points +8%
Huawei P9
95743 Points -36%
HTC 10
131866 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 5
116330 Points -22%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1020 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points -6%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points -13%
Huawei P9
1029 Points +1%
HTC 10
928 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1106 Points +8%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
5033 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points -66%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points -12%
Huawei P9
1583 Points -69%
HTC 10
5009 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4522 Points -10%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1740 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points +29%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points +12%
Huawei P9
2627 Points +51%
HTC 10
1772 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1801 Points +4%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3387 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points +25%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points -8%
Huawei P9
3930 Points +16%
HTC 10
2806 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3638 Points +7%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2345 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points -15%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points -5%
Huawei P9
2025 Points -14%
HTC 10
2193 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2392 Points +2%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
4292 Points
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points -1%
Huawei P9
4904 Points +14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1728 Points
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points +9%
Huawei P9
1755 Points +2%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
7259 Points
Huawei P9
3077 Points -58%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
5121 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points -6%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points +11%
Huawei P9
7058 Points +38%
HTC 10
5809 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 5
6873 Points +34%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
9378 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points +40%
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points +4%
Huawei P9
11783 Points +26%
HTC 10
8905 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 5
8619 Points -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
2580 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S7
2562 ms * +1%
OnePlus 3T
2719 ms * -5%
Huawei P9
2923 ms * -13%
HTC 10
3146 ms * -22%
Xiaomi Mi 5
2973 ms * -15%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
57 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points +30%
OnePlus 3T
54.5 Points -4%
Huawei P9
68.4 Points +20%
HTC 10
52.1 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 5
54 Points -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps -12%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps -2%
Huawei P9
43 fps -28%
HTC 10
43 fps -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5
60 fps 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
93 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps -10%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps -2%
Huawei P9
40 fps -57%
HTC 10
73 fps -22%
Xiaomi Mi 5
90 fps -3%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
49 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps -18%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps -6%
Huawei P9
18 fps -63%
HTC 10
39 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps -14%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
48 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps -44%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps -6%
Huawei P9
19 fps -60%
HTC 10
24 fps -50%
Xiaomi Mi 5
42 fps -12%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
32 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps -12%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps 0%
Huawei P9
10 fps -69%
HTC 10
24 fps -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5
30 fps -6%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
32 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps -53%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps 0%
Huawei P9
11 fps -66%
HTC 10
14 fps -56%
Xiaomi Mi 5
31 fps -3%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
22372 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points -11%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points 0%
Huawei P9
15517 Points -31%
HTC 10
20344 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 5
21483 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
34202 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points -2%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points +1%
Huawei P9
21577 Points -37%
HTC 10
30061 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 5
32613 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
30606 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points -5%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points +1%
Huawei P9
19854 Points -35%
HTC 10
27176 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 5
29246 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
1927 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points +4%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points -25%
Huawei P9
2510 Points +30%
HTC 10
1512 Points -22%
Xiaomi Mi 5
1976 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
4746 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points -36%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points -30%
Huawei P9
1080 Points -77%
HTC 10
4581 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 5
4558 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3580 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points -24%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points -28%
Huawei P9
1237 Points -65%
HTC 10
3157 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 5
3542 Points -1%
AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
15.08 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7
16.01 MB/s +6%
OnePlus 3T
74.4 MB/s +393%
Huawei P9
47.45 MB/s +215%
HTC 10
15.89 MB/s +5%
Xiaomi Mi 5
13.61 MB/s -10%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
100.3 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7
85.9 MB/s -14%
OnePlus 3T
123.6 MB/s +23%
Huawei P9
39 MB/s -61%
HTC 10
29.92 MB/s -70%
Xiaomi Mi 5
106.8 MB/s +6%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
153.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7
145.7 MB/s -5%
OnePlus 3T
165.3 MB/s +8%
Huawei P9
72.2 MB/s -53%
HTC 10
115.6 MB/s -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5
159.3 MB/s +4%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 5s
412.7 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7
483.8 MB/s +17%
OnePlus 3T
436.4 MB/s +6%
Huawei P9
281.3 MB/s -32%
HTC 10
275.1 MB/s -33%
Xiaomi Mi 5
459.6 MB/s +11%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Mi 5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 39.9 °C40.4 °C39 °C 
 39.2 °C40.5 °C39.1 °C 
 37.1 °C37.3 °C38.5 °C 
Maximum: 40.5 °C
Average: 39 °C
34.2 °C35.8 °C36 °C
35.2 °C35.4 °C36.4 °C
35 °C35.3 °C35.9 °C
Maximum: 36.4 °C
Average: 35.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.643.22525.439.73125.334.54032.931.85033.636.36331.635.78028.432.11002734.112520.8391602241.520021.347.125020.849.331521.253.140019.459.950019.562.763017.765.380017.970.1100017.873.9125017.375.5160017.475.6200016.775.4250017.274.8315018.276.9400017.973.3500017.664630017.760.4800017.8641000017.961.81250018.150.21600018.246.8SPL3085N1.356.6median 17.9median 62.7Delta1.412.33832.43832.431.332.430.431.730.436.42636.452.439.452.436.836.236.829.428.629.427.325.427.33321.33343.523.343.548.122.548.152.122.452.160.321.360.358.118.458.162.817.562.865.817.565.868.517.268.567.116.867.170.617.370.672.617.472.67216.67274.417.374.476.817.676.879.217.679.276.917.776.976.517.476.575.917.775.972.317.972.358.118.158.14718.14786.529.886.5651.365median 67.1median 17.7median 67.110.41.710.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 5sXiaomi Mi 5
Xiaomi Mi 5s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.4 / 1.7 / 1.81 Watt
Load midlight 5.84 / 9.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
9%
-18%
-15%
-19%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.4
0.68
-70%
0.61
-53%
0.77
-93%
0.68
-70%
0.45
-13%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.02
40%
1.77
-4%
2.36
-39%
1.49
12%
1.68
1%
Idle Maximum *
1.81
1.14
37%
1.81
-0%
2.37
-31%
1.91
-6%
1.71
6%
Load Average *
5.84
4.73
19%
6.67
-14%
3.09
47%
7.4
-27%
6.7
-15%
Load Maximum *
9.12
7.16
21%
10.98
-20%
5.35
41%
9.71
-6%
9.18
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 55)
11h 03min
Xiaomi Mi 5s
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 5
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
663
456
-31%
494
-25%
569
-14%
413
-38%
504
-24%

Pros

+ 良好性价比
+ 坚固金属外壳
+ 双SIM功能
+ USB-OTG,Miracast和NFC
+ 精确的传感器和良好的触摸屏
+ MIUI 8.0具有许多附加功能
+ 优秀的相机
+ 非常明亮而锐利的显示效果
+ 强大的整体性能
+ 电池续航长

Cons

- 没有LTE频带20
- 没有附送耳机
- 在长时间负载下会节流
- 扬声器听起来很小声
In Review: Xiaomi Mi 5s. Test model courtesy of TradingShenzhen
In Review: Xiaomi Mi 5s. Test model courtesy of TradingShenzhen

小米Mi 5s在许多方面令人印象深刻。在功能方面没有太多妥协:Mi 5s支持双SIM卡,屏幕非常明亮,用户界面MIUI 8. 0提供了大量的附加功能。除了良好的性能,该机在我们实际局域网测试中的续航时间也长。它主要的缺点是:小米忽略了去适应欧洲市场。Global ROM可以弥补一些缺点,但这仍然是一个遗憾——Mi 5s不支持常用的LTE 频带20。一些感兴趣的用户也可能不敢购买,因为该智能手机需要进口。    

小米的Mi 5s将高短配件转配在高档金属外壳中。价格加算上运费和税收,是300欧元(约317美元)起,价位属于中上水平。从国外买,可以说是一个有吸引力的方案。 

在欧洲,该机和其他(官方进口)顶级智能机之间的存在价差,在某些情况下,更为便宜。当然,我们所比较的其他手机,也有起步价格450欧元(〜475美元)的。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Xiaomi Mi 5s - 02/24/2017 v6(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 91%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
46 / 60 → 77%
Weight
93%
Battery
94%
Display
85%
Games Performance
61 / 63 → 97%
Application Performance
59 / 70 → 85%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 72%
Camera
76%
Average
78%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 Mi 5s 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Kilian, 2017-03-13 (Update: 2017-03-19)