Notebookcheck Logo

华为 Mate 9 大屏智能手机简短评测

大胆想象! 如果你喜欢大屏幕的高端手机的话,那么华为的这台最新设备十分值得考虑。除了最新的麒麟960处理器外,你还可以得到最新的安卓7.0系统和EMUI 5.0界面以及大容量电池。而它的最大亮点在于5.9寸IPS屏幕。毋庸置疑它是一台优秀的设备,但在测试中我们也发现了它的一些不足之处。
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen Phablet
Huawei Mate 9 (Mate Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 960 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G71 MP8, Core: 900 MHz
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR4-1800
Display
5.90 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 373 PPI, 电容式,10点触控, IPS, Blaulichtfiler (Nachtmodus), glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 49.55 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合音频接口, Card Reader: MicroSD 最大支持 256 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 位置感应器,加速感应器,方向和重力感应器,数字指南针,气压计, OTG, DLNA, Miracast, 红外传输
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSP/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 和 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (频段 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 和 19), LTE Cat. 11 (频段 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29 (FDD), 38, 39, 40, 41 (TDD)), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 156.9 x 78.9
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 30 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 504 h
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix Monochrome传感器 + 1200万像素 RGB 传感器 莱卡双镜头, Hyprid自动对焦, 光学防抖, Hybrid变焦, 双色调闪光灯, 超高清视频拍摄
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (自动对焦, 1080p视频拍摄)
Additional features
Speakers: 两个扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,USB数据线,SIM卡工具,OTG转接器,快速开始说明,保护壳, EMUI 5.0, Phone Manager, HiCare, Facebook, Smart Controller, Twitter, Todolist, WPS Office, 24 Months Warranty, USB-C, 快速充电, 4麦克风支持噪音降低, 头部辐射值: 1.64 W/kg, 身体辐射值: 1.36 W/kg, fanless
Weight
192 g, Power Supply: 101 g
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s +194%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
435 MBit/s +164%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s +103%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256 MBit/s +55%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
165 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s +105%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
515 MBit/s +99%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s +8%
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
259 MBit/s
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
257 MBit/s -1%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9
Huawei Mate 9

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
12 MP (both sensors combined)
12 MP (both sensors combined)
20 MP (both sensors combined)
both sensors combined (2x hybrid zoom)
20 MP (only monochrome sensor)
681
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
692
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
696
cd/m²
700
cd/m²
686
cd/m²
657
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 700 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 680.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 696 cd/m²
Contrast: 1657:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.33
Huawei Mate 9
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.90
Huawei Mate 8
IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 6.00
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Google Pixel XL 2016
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.30
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70
Screen
-8%
23%
-10%
-14%
7%
4%
Brightness middle
696
514
-26%
557
-20%
402
-42%
784
13%
394.8
-43%
297
-57%
Brightness
680
513
-25%
553
-19%
408
-40%
774
14%
397
-42%
297
-56%
Brightness Distribution
93
94
1%
97
4%
85
-9%
91
-2%
91
-2%
93
0%
Black Level *
0.42
0.35
17%
0.35
17%
0.43
-2%
Contrast
1657
1469
-11%
1591
-4%
1823
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.3
5.08
-18%
1.4
67%
4
7%
6.5
-51%
1.49
65%
2.67
38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.4
8.28
12%
3.1
67%
10.1
-7%
11.7
-24%
3.98
58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
5.49
-14%
1.3
73%
3.2
33%
8
-67%
1.98
59%
2.81
41%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.08 106%
2.21 100%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
2.19 100%
2.08 106%
CCT
7255 90%
7254 90%
6667 97%
7037 92%
8699 75%
6382 102%
6379 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
79.95
63.1
68.08
66.31
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.84
99.83
97.46
99.79

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 43 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
124087 Points
Huawei Mate 8
93767 Points -24%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
94122 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points +33%
Google Pixel XL 2016
138641 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points +4%
Huawei P9
95743 Points -23%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
1947 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3476 Points +79%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1513 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points -5%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points -24%
Huawei P9
1755 Points -10%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
5629 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5630 Points 0%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4167 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points -30%
Huawei P9
4904 Points -13%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
27364 Points
Huawei Mate 8
19179 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
24020 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points +38%
Google Pixel XL 2016
27766 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points +5%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points -8%
Huawei P9
19854 Points -27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
35626 Points
Huawei Mate 8
20537 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
26964 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points +78%
Google Pixel XL 2016
32652 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points -25%
Huawei P9
21577 Points -39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
15104 Points
Huawei Mate 8
15575 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
17380 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points +3%
Google Pixel XL 2016
18222 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points +30%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points +39%
Huawei P9
15517 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2367 Points
Huawei Mate 8
1244 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1488 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points +28%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3180 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points +28%
Huawei P9
1237 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2448 Points
Huawei Mate 8
1092 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1471 Points -40%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points +73%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3935 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points +23%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points +52%
Huawei P9
1080 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2123 Points
Huawei Mate 8
2432 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1552 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points -28%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1902 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points -6%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points -14%
Huawei P9
2510 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2240 Points
Huawei Mate 8
945 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1232 Points -45%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2560 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (1923min) Points -2%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points -2%
Huawei P9
974 Points -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2294 Points
Huawei Mate 8
801 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1155 Points -50%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2820 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (2043min) Points -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points +2%
Huawei P9
829 Points -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2117 Points
Huawei Mate 8
2552 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1606 Points -24%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1935 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (1594min) Points 0%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points -15%
Huawei P9
2503 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2343 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3371 Points +44%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3483 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2641 Points +13%
Lenovo Moto Z
3151 Points +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2421 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5141 Points +112%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4406 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3071 Points +27%
Lenovo Moto Z
3930 Points +62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2104 Points
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1528 Points -27%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2009 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1773 Points -16%
Lenovo Moto Z
1860 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2108 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
2629 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2234 Points +6%
Lenovo Moto Z
2363 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2142 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
2863 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2394 Points +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
2588 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
1997 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016
2044 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1811 Points -9%
Lenovo Moto Z
1813 Points -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
60 fps
Huawei Mate 8
44 fps -27%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps -69%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.7 fps -4%
Google Pixel XL 2016
55 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps -15%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps -12%
Huawei P9
43 fps -28%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
80 fps
Huawei Mate 8
41 fps -49%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps -66%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
92 fps +15%
Google Pixel XL 2016
91 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps +1%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps -4%
Huawei P9
40 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
37 fps
Huawei Mate 8
19 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
11 fps -70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps -68%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.2 fps +49%
Google Pixel XL 2016
30 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps -27%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps -30%
Huawei P9
19 fps -49%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
34 fps
Huawei Mate 8
18 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
18 fps -47%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps -48%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.7 fps +73%
Google Pixel XL 2016
48 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps +21%
Huawei P9
18 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
28 fps
Huawei Mate 8
11 fps -61%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps +48%
Google Pixel XL 2016
17 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps -46%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps -46%
Huawei P9
11 fps -61%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
24 fps
Huawei Mate 8
10 fps -58%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps +72%
Google Pixel XL 2016
32 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps +17%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps +13%
Huawei P9
10 fps -58%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
7403 Points
Huawei Mate 8
7344 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
5113 Points -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016
4739 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points -37%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points +3%
Huawei P9
7058 Points -5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
2772 Points
Huawei Mate 8
2046 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1746 Points -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points -47%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points +12%
Google Pixel XL 2016
2378 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points -25%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points -15%
Huawei P9
2025 Points -27%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
3616 Points
Huawei Mate 8
4064 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
3305 Points -9%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points -62%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points +82%
Google Pixel XL 2016
3889 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points +13%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points -6%
Huawei P9
3930 Points +9%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
3850 Points
Huawei Mate 8
2339 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
1138 Points -70%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points -49%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points -66%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1677 Points -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points -46%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points -43%
Huawei P9
2627 Points -32%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
3939 Points
Huawei Mate 8
1636 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
2476 Points -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points -48%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points +75%
Google Pixel XL 2016
5017 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points -44%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points +10%
Huawei P9
1583 Points -60%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
1076 Points
Huawei Mate 8
1127 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
998 Points -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points +43%
Google Pixel XL 2016
977 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points -11%
Huawei P9
1029 Points -4%
Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
42176 Points
Huawei Mate 8
29659 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
36533 Points -13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
33082 Points -22%
Google Pixel XL 2016
34695 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
41091 Points -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
41445 Points -2%
Huawei P9
29662 Points -30%
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
31104 Points
Huawei Mate 8
16688 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
26108 Points -16%
Google Pixel XL 2016
30724 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32273 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto Z
33028 Points +6%
Huawei P9
16610 Points -47%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
699 Points
Huawei Mate 8
347 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1177 Points +68%
Google Pixel XL 2016
621 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points +5%
Lenovo Moto Z
542 Points -22%
Huawei P9
328 Points -53%
ANDEBench PRO
Device Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
16616 Points
Huawei Mate 8
11703 Points -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016
14128 Points -15%
Lenovo Moto Z
15951 Points -4%
Huawei P9
13100 Points -21%
CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base) (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
5902 Points
Huawei Mate 8
5664 Points -4%
Google Pixel XL 2016
5452 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
4834 Points -18%
Huawei P9
5919 Points 0%
Memory Bandwidth (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
20696 MB/s
Huawei Mate 8
10559 MB/s -49%
Google Pixel XL 2016
18672 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Moto Z
19176 MB/s -7%
Huawei P9
8721 MB/s -58%
Memory Latency (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
6318 KOps/s
Huawei Mate 8
4981 KOps/s -21%
Google Pixel XL 2016
1948 KOps/s -69%
Lenovo Moto Z
5740 KOps/s -9%
Huawei P9
4614 KOps/s -27%
Storage (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
12783 KB/s
Huawei Mate 8
9634 KB/s -25%
Google Pixel XL 2016
19319 KB/s +51%
Lenovo Moto Z
14580 KB/s +14%
Huawei P9
10534 KB/s -18%
Platform (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
489 Points
Huawei Mate 8
286 Points -42%
Google Pixel XL 2016
253.2 Points -48%
Lenovo Moto Z
404.1 Points -17%
Huawei P9
435.2 Points -11%
3D (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
46.18 fps
Huawei Mate 8
30.14 fps -35%
Google Pixel XL 2016
67.4 fps +46%
Lenovo Moto Z
58.9 fps +28%
Huawei P9
31.59 fps -32%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
19.14 fps
Huawei Mate 8
7.9 fps -59%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
6.6 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps -30%
Lenovo Moto Z
24.33 fps +27%
Huawei P9
7.9 fps -59%

Legend

 
Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
152 Points
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
96 Points -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
204 Points +34%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
126 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
163 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 Points -26%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 Points -16%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11897 Points
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11329 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7534 Points -37%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8059 Points -32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
26053 Points +119%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8690 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13191 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7771 Points -35%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11783 Points -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2734 ms *
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3643 ms * -33%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5089 ms * -86%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5553 ms * -103%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1103 ms * +60%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2654 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2564 ms * +6%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3155 ms * -15%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2923 ms * -7%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
68.6 Points
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
48.82 Points -29%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46 Points -33%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
168.1 Points +145%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
75.1 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.5 Points -31%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
68.4 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1076 Points
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1127 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
998 Points -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
837 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
1542 Points +43%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
977 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
994 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
959 Points -11%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1029 Points -4%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7565 Points
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7008 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4666 Points -38%
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6271 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7198 (6255min) Points -5%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5344 Points -29%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6580 (6523min) Points -13%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Mate 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Google Pixel XL 2016
Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
-17%
25%
-10%
28%
145%
44%
Sequential Read 256KB
594
238.3
-60%
385.4
-35%
258.2
-57%
487.3
-18%
439.7
-26%
281.3
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
142.9
124.8
-13%
150.1
5%
83.4
-42%
145.1
2%
168.3
18%
72.2
-49%
Random Read 4KB
94.7
24.98
-74%
90.3
-5%
87.7
-7%
86.7
-8%
117.2
24%
39
-59%
Random Write 4KB
8.77
15.74
79%
20.42
133%
14.56
66%
15.79
80%
74.9
754%
47.45
441%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54
76.4
41%
78.5
45%
55
2%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
29.53
50.4
71%
45.64
55%
24.83
-16%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high60 fps
Max. Load
 44.4 °C42.9 °C40.2 °C 
 43.5 °C43.1 °C41.7 °C 
 41 °C40.8 °C40.9 °C 
Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 42.1 °C
38 °C40.4 °C41.6 °C
38.4 °C39.5 °C40.6 °C
38.8 °C40 °C40.1 °C
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 39.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.72525.424.83125.324.94032.925.65033.635.16331.630.18028.423.31002724.812520.828.71602235.520021.343.325020.849.331521.253.740019.455.150019.56063017.763.380017.961.9100017.863.5125017.367.1160017.461.1200016.770250017.272.6315018.274.1400017.976.2500017.675.7630017.773.9800017.871.51000017.972.51250018.166.71600018.254.1SPL3083.9N1.353.7median 17.9median 63.3Delta1.410.731.630.925.43225.328.532.926.733.63531.626.628.4282733.820.837.62245.821.350.220.856.921.262.919.462.419.566.317.768.217.966.217.869.717.370.517.474.816.775.917.275.718.278.317.981.717.68017.776.617.877.517.974.418.163.318.248.83088.51.372.6median 17.9median 69.71.49.726.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66median 17.2median 6610.13.810.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate 9Google Pixel XL 2016Apple iPhone 7 Plus
Huawei Mate 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel XL 2016 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.78 / 2.13 / 2.17 Watt
Load midlight 6.32 / 6.49 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 8
4000 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
Power Consumption
11%
-88%
20%
29%
25%
4%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
0.85
-9%
2.85
-265%
0.63
19%
0.53
32%
0.66
15%
0.55
29%
Idle Average *
2.13
2.07
3%
2.95
-38%
1.1
48%
1.07
50%
1.01
53%
1.37
36%
Idle Maximum *
2.17
2.28
-5%
3.26
-50%
1.56
28%
1.12
48%
1.09
50%
2.25
-4%
Load Average *
6.32
3.91
38%
8.92
-41%
5.95
6%
5.53
12%
3.97
37%
6.24
1%
Load Maximum *
6.49
4.69
28%
9.39
-45%
6.7
-3%
6.26
4%
8.34
-29%
9.12
-41%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 38min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 39min
Huawei Mate 9
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 8
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Google Pixel XL 2016
3450 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 SM-N920A
 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
-4%
-34%
-22%
6%
Reader / Idle
1538
1872
22%
1835
19%
1078
-30%
1333
-13%
1775
15%
H.264
947
963
2%
813
-14%
611
-35%
505
-47%
WiFi v1.3
758
865
14%
587
-23%
369
-51%
505
-33%
431
-43%
Load
219
256
17%
225
3%
179
-18%
230
5%
322
47%

Pros

+ 相机响应迅速
+ 支持混合变焦的出色相机
+ 高速闪存
+ 小巧雅致的设计
+ 最高三年质保
+ 支持LTE Cat.11
+ 频段覆盖广
+ 出色的通话音质,支持降噪
+ 应用克隆
+ 红外传输
+ 双SIM卡...

Cons

- ...但和储存卡共用插槽
- microSD卡无法作为内部存储直接使用
- 不支持App2SD
- 电源适配器不够坚固
- SD读卡器速度慢
- 一般的无线模组速度
In review: Huawei Mate 9. Test model courtesy of Huawei.
In review: Huawei Mate 9. Test model courtesy of Huawei.

华为Mate 9是这个高端大屏手机系列的一个新成员。它在功能性和性能上更进一步,尽管屏幕尺寸略有缩小,仍然保持了同类设备中最大的尺寸。尽管机身相对较大,但握持手感仍然十分优秀。

它的技术参数非常出色。麒麟960是一块速度很快的高端芯片组,市场上最快处理器的之一。我们十分喜欢它的多任务处理功能。你还会得到4GB内存和64GB闪存(UFS 2.1)空间,它们的性能也都十分优秀。它可以通过microSD卡槽扩展,不过华为应该改进这个读卡器的速度,它的表现只能算是一般般。考虑到5.9寸的大尺寸,它的屏幕分辨率也还有提高的空间。

华为Mate 9搭配了强劲的硬件,并提供了很好的耐力。如果你喜欢大屏手机的话,那么Mate 9是个非常明智的选择。

Mate 9在连接性上无懈可击。它支持高速LTE Cat.11,覆盖多个频段意味着它可以在世界上的大部分地区使用。归功于应用克隆功能,它的双SIM卡机型甚至可以同时使用两个WhatsApp账户(或微信)。它的无线网络连接距离很远,只是传输速率低于其他高端设备。

大容量电池保证了长时间的电池续航,让它更加全面。因此如果你在寻找一台高端配置的大屏幕手机的话,华为Mate 9在市场上罕逢敌手。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Huawei Mate 9 - 11/08/2016 v5.1(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
73 / 75 → 97%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
53 / 60 → 89%
Weight
89%
Battery
96%
Display
87%
Games Performance
60 / 63 → 95%
Application Performance
65 / 70 → 93%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 91 → 80%
Camera
82%
Average
81%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 Mate 9 大屏智能手机简短评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-11-11 (Update: 2016-11-12)