Notebookcheck

华为 P10 Plus 智能手机简短评测

Manuel Masiero (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 06/10/2017
Android Touchscreen Smartphone

性能提升?华为P10 Plus是华为P10高端智能手机中的更大,更好的机型,在我们的评级中达到“非常好”。5.5英寸的P10 Plus能做得更好吗?我们把答案放在评测中。

Huawei P10 Plus (P10 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 960 2.4 GHz
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Display
5.5 inch 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 540 PPI, LTPS, capacitive touchscreen, 10 multi-touch points, Knuckle Touch, LTPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-毫米, Card Reader: micro-SD卡读卡器,高达. 256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: fingerprint, gyroscope, accelerometer, compass, proximity, Hall magnet, IR, Miracast, DLNA, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct, Galileo, GLONASS, BeiDou
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE Cat. 12 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40), downloads max. 600 MBit/s, uploads max. 100 MBit/s, head-SAR 0.89 W/kg, body-SAR 0.76 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7 x 153.5 x 74.2
Battery
3750 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Huawei SuperCharge
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 20 MPix 20 MP monochrome + 12 MP RGB Leica dual camera, Summilux-H 1:1.8/27 ASPH, OIS, hybrid autofocus (phase detection, contrast, laser, and depth autofocus), zweifarbiger Blitz, 4K-Videoaufnahmen
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix F/1.9, AF
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, modular power supply, USB Type-C cable, SIM tool, headset, case, quick start guide, EMUI 5.1, 36 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
165 g, Power Supply: 45 g
Price
700 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
368 MBit/s ∼100% +802%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
325 MBit/s ∼88% +697%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼70% +530%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
48.8 MBit/s ∼13% +20%
Huawei P10 Plus
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
40.8 MBit/s ∼11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
656 MBit/s ∼100% +413%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼48% +145%
LG G6
Adreno 530, 821 MSM8996 Pro, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
220 MBit/s ∼34% +72%
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
154 MBit/s ∼23% +20%
Huawei P10 Plus
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
128 MBit/s ∼20%
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Huawei P10 Plus
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
542
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 586 cd/m² Average: 561.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.93 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 568 cd/m²
Contrast: 1321:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.37
Huawei P10 Plus
LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
22%
-32%
-100%
17%
-10%
-1%
Brightness
562
553
-2%
556
-1%
430
-23%
562
0%
611
9%
490
-13%
Brightness Distribution
92
97
5%
86
-7%
84
-9%
93
1%
89
-3%
92
0%
Black Level *
0.43
0.35
19%
0.43
-0%
0.23
47%
Contrast
1321
1591
20%
1272
-4%
2809
113%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
1.4
42%
4.8
-100%
7.1
-196%
1.7
29%
4.5
-88%
2.1
12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.3
48%
4.5
-80%
6.8
-172%
1.6
36%
6
-140%
2.6
-4%
Gamma
2.37 101%
2.21 109%
2.39 100%
2.23 108%
2.13 113%
2.27 106%
2.23 108%
CCT
6779 96%
6667 97%
7194 90%
7866 83%
6435 101%
7996 81%
6843 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.1
81.57
67.74
88.14
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.83
99.87
99.05
100

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 59 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 4396 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43.7 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
138326 Points ∼61%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼73% +20%
Huawei P10
140084 Points ∼61% +1%
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼70% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points ∼73% +20%
LG G6
151751 Points ∼67% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼57% -7%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
6267 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points ∼44% +7%
LG G6
4369 Points ∼29% -30%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1852 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points ∼42% +9%
LG G6
1831 Points ∼38% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1679 Points ∼56%
Huawei P10
1902 Points ∼63% +13%
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼57% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points ∼82% +47%
LG G6
1955 Points ∼65% +16%
Lenovo Moto Z
1797 Points ∼60% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1767 Points ∼33%
Huawei P10
2409 Points ∼45% +36%
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼45% +37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points ∼65% +97%
LG G6
2980 Points ∼55% +69%
Lenovo Moto Z
2336 Points ∼43% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1747 Points ∼45%
Huawei P10
2274 Points ∼59% +30%
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼57% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points ∼82% +82%
LG G6
2669 Points ∼69% +53%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼56% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1662 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points ∼52% -8%
Huawei P10
2193 Points ∼75% +32%
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼50% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points ∼84% +48%
LG G6
1961 Points ∼67% +18%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼63% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
2469 Points ∼32%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points ∼55% +72%
Huawei P10
2816 Points ∼36% +14%
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼43% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points ∼62% +94%
LG G6
4121 Points ∼53% +67%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼48% +51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
2229 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points ∼61% +36%
Huawei P10
2649 Points ∼53% +19%
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼52% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points ∼80% +78%
LG G6
3282 Points ∼66% +47%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼61% +36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
14934 Points ∼22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points ∼23% +5%
Huawei P10
15341 Points ∼22% +3%
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼32% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points ∼30% +40%
LG G6
22335 Points ∼32% +50%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼30% +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
33307 Points ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points ∼14% +90%
Huawei P10
35964 Points ∼8% +8%
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼8% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points ∼7% -1%
LG G6
32128 Points ∼7% -4%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼6% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
26156 Points ∼13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points ∼19% +44%
Huawei P10
27692 Points ∼14% +6%
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼16% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points ∼15% +12%
LG G6
29276 Points ∼15% +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼13% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
56 fps ∼4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
91.96 fps ∼7% +64%
Huawei P10
69 fps ∼5% +23%
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼7% +63%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps ∼8% +86%
LG G6
75 fps ∼6% +34%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼6% +38%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
40 fps ∼9%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.71 fps ∼13% +44%
Huawei P10
55 fps ∼12% +38%
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼13% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps ∼13% +45%
LG G6
46 fps ∼10% +15%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼12% +33%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
19 fps ∼3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.71 fps ∼11% +209%
Huawei P10
30 fps ∼6% +58%
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼8% +142%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps ∼9% +163%
LG G6
38 fps ∼7% +100%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼8% +116%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
29 fps ∼13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.17 fps ∼24% +90%
Huawei P10
32 fps ∼14% +10%
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼20% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps ∼17% +31%
LG G6
27 fps ∼12% -7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼11% -10%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
22 fps ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼10% +88%
Huawei P10
24 fps ∼6% +9%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼8% +45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps ∼10% +91%
LG G6
29 fps ∼7% +32%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼6% +23%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
12 fps ∼7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼24% +246%
Huawei P10
25 fps ∼14% +108%
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼18% +167%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps ∼13% +92%
LG G6
16 fps ∼9% +33%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼9% +25%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
7377 Points ∼89%
Huawei P10
7341 Points ∼88% 0%
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼68% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points ∼70% -21%
LG G6
5703 Points ∼69% -23%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼92% +4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
1054 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei P10
1077 Points ∼70% +2%
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼58% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points ∼75% +10%
LG G6
1073 Points ∼70% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼62% -9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
3438 Points ∼40%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼80% +100%
Huawei P10
4115 Points ∼48% +20%
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼52% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points ∼71% +78%
LG G6
5138 Points ∼60% +49%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼50% +26%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
3331 Points ∼78%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼31% -60%
Huawei P10
2778 Points ∼65% -17%
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼46% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points ∼73% -6%
LG G6
1930 Points ∼45% -42%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼51% -34%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
3572 Points ∼54%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼100% +84%
Huawei P10
3830 Points ∼58% +7%
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼48% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points ∼81% +49%
LG G6
3646 Points ∼55% +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼52% -5%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
2563 Points ∼69%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼84% +21%
Huawei P10
2621 Points ∼71% +2%
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼60% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points ∼89% +29%
LG G6
2496 Points ∼68% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼64% -8%

Legend

 
Huawei P10 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
10213 Points ∼21%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
26053 Points ∼53% +155%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
10236 Points ∼21% 0%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
9798 Points ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points ∼28% +38%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
9113 Points ∼18% -11%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
7771 Points ∼16% -24%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)
3107 ms * ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
1102.7 ms * ∼2% +65%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
3128.7 ms * ∼5% -1%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
2719.3 ms * ∼5% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2236.7 ms * ∼4% +28%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
2464.2 ms * ∼4% +21%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
3154.7 ms * ∼5% -2%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
140 Points ∼24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points ∼35% +46%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
136 Points ∼23% -3%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
135 Points ∼23% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points ∼27% +10%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
122 Points ∼21% -13%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
112 Points ∼19% -20%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Plus
58.427 Points ∼0%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)
168.08 Points ∼1% +188%
Huawei P10 (Chrome 56)
57.9 Points ∼0% -1%
OnePlus 3T (Chrome 54.0.2840.85)
54.526 Points ∼0% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.198 Points ∼0% +6%
LG G6 (Chrome 57)
56.628 Points ∼0% -3%
Lenovo Moto Z (Chrome 53)
47.5 Points ∼0% -19%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P10 PlusHuawei P10OnePlus 3TSamsung Galaxy S8 PlusLG G6Lenovo Moto Z
AndroBench 3-5
0%
-32%
-0%
-18%
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
33.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32.19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-4%
57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
70%
53.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
59%
45.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
36%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
54.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
54.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
0%
71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
32%
77.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
44%
78.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45%
Random Write 4KB
149.78
152.31
2%
74.39
-50%
15.27
-90%
16.58
-89%
74.93
-50%
Random Read 4KB
173.06
168.42
-3%
123.57
-29%
127.18
-27%
95.19
-45%
117.15
-32%
Sequential Write 256KB
182.64
189.83
4%
165.3
-9%
194.18
6%
122.85
-33%
168.32
-8%
Sequential Read 256KB
732.94
737.65
1%
436.43
-40%
787.6
7%
428.67
-42%
439.66
-40%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
in comparison
Lenovo B (min)
 MT6735M, Mali-T720
10
   ...
Gigaset ME Pro
 810 MSM8994, Adreno 430
29
Lenovo Yoga Book Android YB1-X90F
 Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
30
Huawei P10 Plus
 Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8
30
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
30
Lenovo Phab 2 Pro
 652 MSM8976, Adreno 510
30
   ...
HTC 10 (max)
 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530
48
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high56 fps
Max. Load
 48.2 °C47.3 °C44.9 °C 
 48.3 °C47.3 °C49.1 °C 
 47 °C46.5 °C48.8 °C 
Maximum: 49.1 °C
Average: 47.5 °C
40.9 °C43.2 °C44.1 °C
41.2 °C42.4 °C44.2 °C
40.7 °C42.6 °C44.1 °C
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 42.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  37.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.22525.433.13125.329.94032.9255033.629.26331.631.28028.426.9100272612520.833.91602243.520021.349.925020.854.831521.257.540019.462.350019.566.463017.767.380017.964100017.863.2125017.364.9160017.462.5200016.756.3250017.260315018.261400017.963.2500017.662.8630017.760.3800017.861.61000017.962.51250018.164.51600018.255.8SPL3075.6N1.336.8median 17.9Huawei P10 Plusmedian 61.6Delta1.34.831.639.925.439.825.339.732.934.733.634.731.632.728.427.82726.420.828.62241.521.350.520.855.921.260.319.46519.568.617.766.817.964.417.866.917.371.517.473.516.774.517.273.718.272.217.970.517.670.717.764.817.860.417.95918.148.418.232.83082.71.352.3median 17.9Huawei P10median 64.81.310.626.428.426.42826.72825.828.725.829.133.229.126.12626.123.925.523.927.724.727.733.426.933.441.53741.540.320.240.343.720.243.745.521.845.547224752.822.252.860.121.860.166.517.266.569.217.869.271.619.871.669.919.169.96815.46869.515.669.56614.96671.514.771.571.214.271.272.21472.271.213.971.26713.86758.913.958.952.413.952.454.713.754.781.529.581.549.91.349.9median 66Apple iPhone 7 Plusmedian 17.2median 6610.93.810.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Huawei P10 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.33 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.03 / 2.61 / 2.83 Watt
Load midlight 7.03 / 10.08 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P10 Plus
3750 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Power Consumption
23%
15%
21%
46%
30%
44%
Idle Minimum *
1.03
0.77
25%
0.83
19%
0.61
41%
0.68
34%
0.62
40%
0.66
36%
Idle Average *
2.61
2.04
22%
2.1
20%
1.77
32%
1.13
57%
1.43
45%
1.01
61%
Idle Maximum *
2.83
2.24
21%
2.18
23%
1.81
36%
1.16
59%
1.48
48%
1.09
61%
Load Average *
7.03
4.69
33%
6.57
7%
6.67
5%
4.69
33%
5.52
21%
3.97
44%
Load Maximum *
10.08
8.66
14%
9.32
8%
10.98
-9%
5.24
48%
10.47
-4%
8.34
17%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
27h 35min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
12h 40min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 54min
Huawei P10 Plus
3750 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
LG G6
3300 mAh
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
6%
-1%
5%
12%
12%
4%
Reader / Idle
1655
1835
11%
1540
-7%
1423
-14%
1565
-5%
1789
8%
1371
-17%
Load
174
225
29%
176
1%
282
62%
275
58%
252
45%
320
84%
WiFi v1.3
760
587
-23%
966
27%
494
-35%
736
-3%
692
-9%
407
-46%
H.264
756
813
8%
582
-23%
810
7%
742
-2%
779
3%
724
-4%

Pros

+ 优雅的设计,优质的机身
+ 非常快的系统芯片
+ 128 GB UFS 2.1存储
+ 可扩展存储
+ 6 GB 运行内存
+ 非常好的莱卡双摄像头
+ 非常明亮的WQHD屏幕
+ 电池续航长
+ 良好的立体声扬声器
+ 通过SuperCharge快速充电
+ 最多3年保修

Cons

- 存储像是一个概率游戏
- 固件保留了大量的存储空间
- 没有App2SD
- 慢速Wi-Fi
- 平庸的micro-SD传输速率
- 负载时节流
In review: Huawei P10 Plus (VKY-L09). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Huawei P10 Plus (VKY-L09). Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

就像5.1英寸的 华为 P10 那样, 更大的5.5英寸华为P10 Plus不必接受批评。P10 Plus还配备了丰富的高端组件——从无可挑剔的机身到UFS 2.1存储和LTE Cat.12,再到高速HiSilicon Kirin 960 系统芯片。

毫无疑问,华为P10 Plus是一款优质的高端智能手机。但是,尽管华为P10配置更优,但它并没有从廉价版的华为P10中脱颖而出。

749欧元(〜700美元)的官方价格,对比600欧元(〜646美元)版本的P10,多出了一些性能。它配备了6 GB的运行内存,128 GB的存储空间,一个超高清而不是全高清分辨率的屏幕,一块更强大的电池和稍微改进的莱卡双摄像头。这些改进让P10 Plus在数据上看起来比P10更好,但在实践中并没有很明显。当忽略明显数值的增加时,性能差异不明显。

该机是不错的智能手机,但是,有着和华为 P10 一样缺点。这包括薄弱的Wi-Fi模块,缓慢的micro-SD读卡器,在负载时的节流,存储会损耗固件,以及在测试时不稳定的内存表现。这将会是一个概率游戏:用户买到的是具有快速闪存还是eMMC缓存的机器。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Huawei P10 Plus - 06/06/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 94%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
48 / 60 → 81%
Weight
91%
Battery
95%
Display
91%
Games Performance
56 / 63 → 88%
Application Performance
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperature
78%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 91 → 89%
Camera
81%
Average
80%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 P10 Plus 智能手机简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2017-06-10 (Update: 2017-06-12)