三星 Galaxy S7 Edge 智能手机简短评测

Name: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Brand: Samsung

建立标准！Galaxy S7 Edge肯定不算是满载突破性创新，不过它将最尖端的科技完美融合于机身之内，理所应当是同类产品中的一座风向标。不过，它也有一些值得一提的缺点，同时我们也希望三星可以在一些方面更勇于改变。

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 04/09/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Galaxy S Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Galaxy Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa 8 x 2.6 GHz, Mongoose / Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T880 MP12, Core: 650 MHz, Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1

Memory

4 GB

, LP-DDR4 RAM

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel, 电容式，10点触控，弧线屏幕边缘, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes

Storage

32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 32 GB

, 24.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机麦克风接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 200 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距传感器，加速传感器，位置传感器，环境光传感器，旋转传感器，方向传感器，重力传感器，电子指南针，气压计，心率计, OTG, Ant+, MST

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 150.9 x 72.6

Battery

13.86 Wh, 3600 mAh Lithium-Ion, 3.85 伏

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix (索尼IMX260传感器, f/1.7, 自动对焦, 图像防抖, 追踪对焦, HDR, UHD视频拍摄, 慢镜头, 快进拍摄, 支持RAW)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (定焦, f/1.7, HDR, 美化模式)

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器，数据线，OTG转接头，耳机，快速开始说明，安全说明, TouchWiz UI, Gear, Galaxy apps, S Health, S Voice, voice recorder, S Planner, myGalaxy, upday, 24 Months Warranty, IP68 认证, 头部辐射值: 0.264 W/kg, 身体辐射值: 0.507 W/kg, 快速充电, 无线充电 (WPC/PMA), fanless

Weight

157 g

Price

799 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

OnePlus 2

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

OnePlus 2

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Apple iPhone 6s Plus

OnePlus 2

Canon EOS 70D


555 cd/m²	557 cd/m²	555 cd/m²
543 cd/m²	554 cd/m²	557 cd/m²
532 cd/m²	557 cd/m²	554 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 557 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 551.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.77 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 554 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.01 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
82.12% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
93.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.01

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50	Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.10	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.50	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70	Apple iPhone 6S Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50	Google Nexus 6P AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70	Huawei Mate 8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 6.00
Screen		-21%	-202%	-35%	-36%	-14%	-79%
Brightness middle	554	343 -38%	560 1%	297 -46%	583 5%	363 -34%	514 -7%
Brightness	552	338 -39%	541 -2%	297 -46%	560 1%	365 -34%	513 -7%
Brightness Distribution	96	94 -2%	85 -11%	93 -3%	91 -5%	90 -6%	94 -2%
Black Level *			0.45		0.46		0.35
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.59	2.2 -38%	9.19 -478%	2.67 -68%	3.55 -123%	2.34 -47%	5.08 -219%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.56		15.01 -486%	3.98 -55%			8.28 -223%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.01	2.37 -18%	10.58 -426%	2.81 -40%	3.88 -93%	1.03 49%	5.49 -173%
Gamma	2.01 ^109%	2.41 ^91%	2.7 ^81%	2.08 ^106%	2.2 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	6321 ^103%	6425 ^101%	9760 ^67%	6379 ^102%	7280 ^89%	6429 ^101%	7254 ^90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	82.12	87.77 7%	73.19 -11%	66.31 -19%	59.05 -28%		79.95 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99.98			99.79 0%	92.8 -7%		99.84 0%
Contrast			1244		1267		1469

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2170 (2120^min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	1503 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 8	1721 Points -21%
Huawei Mate S	941 Points -57%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2538 Points +17%
OnePlus 2	1140 Points -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1335 Points -38%
Google Nexus 6P	1335 Points -38%
LG G4	1107 Points -49%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2376 Points +9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6480 (6415^min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	5619 Points -13%
Huawei Mate 8	6265 Points -3%
Huawei Mate S	3970 Points -39%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4429 Points -32%
OnePlus 2	4804 Points -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	4492 Points -31%
Google Nexus 6P	4587 Points -29%
LG G4	3556 Points -45%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	5500 Points -15%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2710 (2421^min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	1505 Points -44%
Huawei Mate 8	1244 Points -54%
Huawei Mate S	373 Points -86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3316 Points +22%
OnePlus 2	1734 Points -36%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2009 Points -26%
Google Nexus 6P	1877 Points -31%
LG G4	1324 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	3015 (2895^min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	1492 Points -51%
Huawei Mate 8	1092 Points -64%
Huawei Mate S	315 Points -90%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4557 Points +51%
OnePlus 2	1854 Points -39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2336 Points -23%
Google Nexus 6P	2302 Points -24%
LG G4	1399 Points -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2002 (1539^min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	1553 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 8	2432 Points +21%
Huawei Mate S	1052 Points -47%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1697 Points -15%
OnePlus 2	1414 Points -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1348 Points -33%
Google Nexus 6P	1142 Points -43%
LG G4	1115 Points -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2204 (1923^min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	1186 Points -46%
Huawei Mate 8	945 Points -57%
Huawei Mate S	311 Points -86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2318 Points +5%
OnePlus 2	938 Points -57%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1132 Points -49%
Google Nexus 6P	1519 Points -31%
LG G4	513 Points -77%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2207 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2229 (2043^min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	1152 Points -48%
Huawei Mate 8	801 Points -64%
Huawei Mate S	259 Points -88%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2601 Points +17%
OnePlus 2	846 Points -62%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1074 Points -52%
Google Nexus 6P	1589 Points -29%
LG G4	440 Points -80%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2773 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2121 (1594^min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	1320 Points -38%
Huawei Mate 8	2552 Points +20%
Huawei Mate S	1051 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1676 Points -21%
OnePlus 2	1517 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1402 Points -34%
Google Nexus 6P	1317 Points -38%
LG G4	1216 Points -43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	1288 Points -39%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4660 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	5050 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 8	7344 Points +58%
Huawei Mate S	4872 Points +5%
OnePlus 2	4282 Points -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	5094 Points +9%
Google Nexus 6P	4716 Points +1%
LG G4	4579 Points -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	6590 Points +41%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2074 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	1821 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 8	2046 Points -1%
Huawei Mate S	1222 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	2206 Points +6%
OnePlus 2	1681 Points -19%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1649 Points -20%
Google Nexus 6P	1405 Points -32%
LG G4	1596 Points -23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2410 Points +16%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	4080 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	3989 Points -2%
Huawei Mate 8	4064 Points 0%
Huawei Mate S	2129 Points -48%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	3925 Points -4%
OnePlus 2	2536 Points -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	2737 Points -33%
Google Nexus 6P	1798 Points -56%
LG G4	2368 Points -42%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	3600 Points -12%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2072 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	1426 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 8	2339 Points +13%
Huawei Mate S	1304 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1124 Points -46%
OnePlus 2	1297 Points -37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	876 Points -58%
Google Nexus 6P	1136 Points -45%
LG G4	1558 Points -25%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	2035 Points -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2203 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	2489 Points +13%
Huawei Mate 8	1636 Points -26%
Huawei Mate S	962 Points -56%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4299 Points +95%
OnePlus 2	2631 Points +19%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	3137 Points +42%
Google Nexus 6P	2424 Points +10%
LG G4	1995 Points -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	4710 Points +114%

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	8049 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	8438 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 8	6990 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	7975 Points -1%
OnePlus 2	6462 Points -20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	7332 Points -9%
LG G4	7695 Points -4%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	225427 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	176225 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 8	270825 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	47850 Points -79%
OnePlus 2	126720 Points -44%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	127736 Points -43%
LG G4	103512 Points -54%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	36364 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	68872 Points +89%
Huawei Mate 8	74503 Points +105%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	96768 Points +166%
OnePlus 2	44133 Points +21%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	34121 Points -6%
LG G4	67837 Points +87%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6136 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	6924 Points +13%
Huawei Mate 8	7338 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	18062 Points +194%
OnePlus 2	6632 Points +8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	6631 Points +8%
LG G4	6223 Points +1%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	6382 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	5274 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 8	6747 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	4818 Points -25%
OnePlus 2	5395 Points -15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	5907 Points -7%
LG G4	4850 Points -24%
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	2131 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	2345 Points +10%
Huawei Mate 8	1548 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	1972 Points -7%
OnePlus 2	1534 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	1857 Points -13%
LG G4	2179 Points +2%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	733 Points
Huawei Mate 8	347 Points -53%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	858 Points +17%
OnePlus 2	427 Points -42%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	478 Points -35%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	13.31 fps
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	9.97 fps -25%
Huawei Mate 8	7.9 fps -41%
OnePlus 2	15.68 fps +18%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	14.52 fps +9%
LG G4	8.74 fps -34%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	22.7 fps +71%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	128749 Points
Huawei Mate 8	93767 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	133626 Points +4%
OnePlus 2	65936 Points -49%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	78324 Points -39%
Google Nexus 6P	79502 Points -38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	131327 Points +2%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	6.1 fps -59%
Huawei Mate 8	11 fps -27%
Huawei Mate S	4.4 fps -71%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	28 fps +87%
OnePlus 2	19 fps +27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	19 fps +27%
Google Nexus 6P	9.5 fps -37%
LG G4	5.7 fps -62%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	15 fps 0%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	28 fps
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge	13 fps -54%
Huawei Mate 8	10 fps -64%
Huawei Mate S	3.9 fps -86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus	28 fps 0%
OnePlus 2	19 fps -32%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	18 fps -36%
Google Nexus 6P	16 fps -43%
LG G4	10 fps -64%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	31 fps +11%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	7.9 fps
Huawei Mate 8	6.7 fps -15%
OnePlus 2	11 fps +39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	6.1 fps -23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	9.4 fps +19%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge	15 fps
Huawei Mate 8	6.2 fps -59%
OnePlus 2	11 fps -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium	5.8 fps -61%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP	18 fps +20%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Mate S HiSilicon Kirin 935, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

LG G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530,

WebXPRT 2015 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | BaseMark OS II

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	163 Points
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	139 Points -15%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	73 Points -55%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	190 Points +17%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	80 Points -51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	106 Points -35%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	116 Points -29%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	82 Points -50%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	108 Points -34%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 Points -31%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	13191 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	8650 Points -34%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11329 Points -14%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4106 Points -69%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	15967 Points +21%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6955 Points -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8851 Points -33%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8804 Points -33%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7832 (6791^min) Points -41%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	10559 Points -20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	8395 Points -36%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8059 Points -39%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	75.1 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	49.19 Points -35%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	65 Points -13%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25.41 Points -66%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	118.7 Points +58%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.29 Points -41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	48.2 Points -36%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.4 Points -37%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	43.12 Points -43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	64 Points -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	55 Points -27%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46 Points -39%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2564 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	4037 ms * -57%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3643 ms * -42%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11029 ms * -330%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1743 ms * +32%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6585 ms * -157%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4377 ms * -71%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4193 ms * -64%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4771 ms * -86%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	6310 ms * -146%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	2460 ms * +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5553 ms * -117%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	994 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	778 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1127 Points +13%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	834 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1199 Points +21%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	923 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	986 Points -1%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	791 Points -20%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	881 Points -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	985 Points -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	837 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5 | PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 | BaseMark OS II

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	487.3 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	319.3 MB/s -34%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	238.3 MB/s -51%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	144 MB/s -70%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	234.2 MB/s -52%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	256.8 MB/s -47%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	236.3 MB/s -52%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	251 MB/s -48%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	439 MB/s -10%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	145.1 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	139.1 MB/s -4%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	124.8 MB/s -14%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	103.4 MB/s -29%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	125.5 MB/s -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	99.4 MB/s -31%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	122.5 MB/s -16%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	153 MB/s +5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	142 MB/s -2%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	86.7 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	77.4 MB/s -11%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.98 MB/s -71%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	27.25 MB/s -69%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21.87 MB/s -75%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	19.11 MB/s -78%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	20.1 MB/s -77%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	31.5 MB/s -64%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	101 MB/s +16%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	15.79 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	19.84 MB/s +26%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15.74 MB/s 0%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	17.74 MB/s +12%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13.94 MB/s -12%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	14.53 MB/s -8%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.79 MB/s -25%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15 MB/s -5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	12.9 MB/s -18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	76.4 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	50.4 MB/s

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - Disk Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	36364 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	68872 Points +89%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	74503 Points +105%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	96768 Points +166%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44133 Points +21%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	34121 Points -6%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	67837 Points +87%

BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2072 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	1426 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2339 Points +13%
Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1304 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1124 Points -46%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1297 Points -37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	876 Points -58%
Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1136 Points -45%
LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1558 Points -25%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996	2035 Points -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1945 Points -6%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	31 fps
	very low	30 fps

Real Racing 3
	Settings	Value
	high	44 fps

... in comparison

Temple Run 2
	Settings	Value
	default	60 fps

... in comparison

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	56 fps

... in comparison

Max. Load

Idle


40 °C	39.8 °C	37.2 °C
39 °C	38.7 °C	35.5 °C
37.3 °C	36 °C	33.6 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 37.5 °C


35.4 °C	37.6 °C	39.1 °C
34.7 °C	36.7 °C	35.4 °C
33.9 °C	34 °C	34.3 °C

Maximum: 39.1 °C
Average: 35.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.09 Watt
Idle	0.63 / 1.1 / 1.56 Watt
Load	5.95 / 6.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption		18%	-22%	-9%	-144%	-21%
Idle Minimum *	0.63	0.5 21%	0.96 -52%	0.5 21%	2.85 -352%	0.85 -35%
Idle Average *	1.1	0.9 18%	1.35 -23%	1.9 -73%	2.95 -168%	2.07 -88%
Idle Maximum *	1.56	1.3 17%	1.4 10%	2.2 -41%	3.26 -109%	2.28 -46%
Load Average *	5.95	3.8 36%	6.11 -3%	3.2 46%	8.92 -50%	3.91 34%
Load Maximum *	6.7	6.8 -1%	9.43 -41%	6.4 4%	9.39 -40%	4.69 30%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		27h 43min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 14min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 32min

	Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 13.86 Wh, 95	Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge 10 Wh, 92	Samsung Galaxy S7 11.55 Wh, 92.6	Huawei Mate 8 Wh, 96	Microsoft Lumia 950 XL 13 Wh, 89.8	Apple iPhone 6S Plus 10 Wh, 91.9	Motorola Moto X Force Wh, 91	Sony Xperia Z5 Premium 13 Wh, 91
Battery Runtime		-36%	-17%	0%	-43%	-26%	-21%	-43%
Reader / Idle	1663	1349 -19%	1810 9%	1872 13%	1078 -35%	1655 0%	1610 -3%	1277 -23%
H.264	914	417 -54%	892 -2%	963 5%	611 -33%	714 -22%	710 -22%	411 -55%
WiFi v1.3	732	534 -27%	456 -38%	865 18%	369 -50%	513 -30%	426 -42%	372 -49%
Load	392	224 -43%	242 -38%	256 -35%	179 -54%	197 -50%	330 -16%	210 -46%

Pros

+ 优异的相机

+ 极速处理器

+ 可扩展存储空间

+ 防尘防水(IP68)

+ 出色的屏幕

+ 超长电池续航时间

+ 快速充电和无线充电

+ 通话音质

+ 附赠效果优秀的耳机

+ 附赠OTG转接头

Cons

- 无红外传感器

- 无收音机

- 专业模式中的实时取景不总是可靠

- 仅支持micro-USB 2.0

- 不支持MHL或SlimPort

In review: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

三星开发了一款不管是外观还是性能都十分出色的智能手机，它足以成为同类产品的新标杆。这家韩国生产商应该还可以为它提供更好的连接性，比如最新的LTE标准以及最新的接口标准。它没有采用USB C型接口让人有些失望。

除此之外，这台三星智能手机让人无可挑剔。它的屏幕是截稿时我们测试过的智能手机中最优秀的，它的相机在暗光环境下也能拍摄效果极佳的照片。除此之外，惊人的电池续航时间则让它相比标准版的Galaxy S7有了更高的价值。屏幕的弧形边缘看起来很新颖，是否喜欢则要用户自行判断了。弧线形的屏幕所带来的额外功能十分有限。

三星的Galaxy S7 Edge兼具高性能，明亮屏幕，出色相机和超长电池续航。

三星凭借全新的Galaxy S7系列守住了在我们智能手机排行榜中的领先位置。不过，最新的机型更像是例行维护，而缺少创新的光芒。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge - 2016-12-09 12/09/2016 v6^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

94%

Keyboard

72 / 75 → 96%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

51 / 60 → 85%

Weight

92%

Battery

95%

Display

92%

Games Performance

59 / 63 → 93%

Application Performance

60 / 70 → 86%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

69 / 91 → 76%

Camera

94%

Average

82%

91%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星 Galaxy S7 Edge 智能手机简短评测

Daniel Schmidt, 2016-04- 9 (Update: 2016-04- 9)