Notebookcheck Logo

联想 Moto Z 智能手机简短评测

Moto热忱。 联想的新旗舰机Moto Z不仅支持高端科技,也希望通过超薄机身和模块拓展吸引用户。它的理念在实际使用中可以行得通吗?或者它会有电池续航不足等缺点呢?
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone
Lenovo Moto Z (Moto Z Series)
Processor
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Core: 510 MHz
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 534 PPI, 电容式, AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.8 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: USB-C到3.5毫米耳机接口转接头, Card Reader: microSD 最大支持 2 TB (与第二张SIM卡共用插槽), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器,近距感应器,霍尔感应器,磁感仪,陀螺仪, USB-OTG, Moto Mods
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS / HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz), 4G LTE (频段 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41), 头部辐射值: 0.304 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.19 x 155.3 x 75.3
Battery
9.8 Wh, 2600 mAh
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (自动对焦 f/1.8, 2160p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (定焦 f/2.2, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: 前置单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, 电源适配器,音频转接头,SIM卡工具, Moto-App, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
136 g, Power Supply: 97 g
Price
699 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo Moto Z - Front
Lenovo Moto Z - Rear
Lenovo Moto Z - Rear with fingerprints
Lenovo Moto Z - Camera
Lenovo Moto Z - Moto Mods contacts
Lenovo Moto Z - Physical buttons
Lenovo Moto Z - Box
Lenovo Moto Z - Audio adapter
Lenovo Moto Z - Power adapter

Size Comparison

159.3 mm 77.8 mm 7.5 mm 178 g158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 188 g155.3 mm 75.3 mm 5.19 mm 136 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g152.3 mm 75.3 mm 6.98 mm 162 g150.9 mm 72.6 mm 7.7 mm 157 g149.4 mm 73.9 mm 7.7 mm 159 g
Style Shell Nylon
Style Shell Nylon
Style Shell Nylon
Style Shell Nylon
Style Shell Nylon
Style Shell Nylon with transparent bumper
Transparent bumper
JBL speaker
JBL speaker
JBL-Lautsprecher
Insta-Share projector
Insta-Share projector
Insta-Share projector
Insta-Share projector
Insta-Share projector
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
491 MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
427 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
303 MBit/s ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼62% -38%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
286 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe
395 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
360 MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼73% -19%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
256 MBit/s ∼65% -29%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼52% -43%
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
151 MBit/s ∼38% -58%
Lenovo Moto Z - Overview
Lenovo Moto Z - Overview
Lenovo Moto Z - Bridge
Lenovo Moto Z - Bridge
Lenovo Moto Z - Turning Point
Lenovo Moto Z - Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning Point
Garmin Edge 500 - Turning Point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Sample picture
Sample picture
Sample picture HDR
Sample picture
Macro shot
Sample picture HDR
Panorama – horizontally
Panorama – vertically
Picture of the ColorChecker colors. The reference color is displayed in the lower part of each patch.
Picture of the ColorChecker colors. The reference color is displayed in the lower part of each patch.
Test chart (click for original)
Test chart (click for original)
486
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
506
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 512 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 490.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.87 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 485 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88.14% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Lenovo Moto Z
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.30
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Google Nexus 6P
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.70
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Screen
Brightness middle
485
554
14%
784
62%
361
-26%
419
-14%
363
-25%
297
-39%
557
15%
Brightness
490
552
13%
774
58%
366
-25%
431
-12%
365
-26%
297
-39%
553
13%
Brightness Distribution
92
96
4%
91
-1%
87
-5%
84
-9%
90
-2%
93
1%
97
5%
Black Level *
0.43
0.35
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
1.59
24%
6.5
-210%
5.1
-143%
4.1
-95%
2.34
-11%
2.67
-27%
1.4
33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
2.56
53%
11.7
-113%
10
-82%
12
-118%
3.98
28%
3.1
44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
2.01
23%
8
-208%
5.5
-112%
3.3
-27%
1.03
60%
2.81
-8%
1.3
50%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.01 109%
2.22 99%
2.24 98%
2.1 105%
2.23 99%
2.08 106%
2.21 100%
CCT
6843 95%
6321 103%
8699 75%
7388 88%
6550 99%
6429 101%
6379 102%
6667 97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88.14
82.12
-7%
68.08
-23%
89.38
1%
66.31
-25%
63.1
-28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.98
0%
97.46
-3%
100
0%
99.79
0%
99.83
0%
Contrast
1823
1591

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21792 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 5.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).
Grayscale (Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Standard, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space AdobeRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Intense, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Intense, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Intense, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Intense, target color space sRGB)
ColorChecker (Intense, target color space AdobeRGB)
ColorChecker (Intense, target color space AdobeRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Intense, target color space sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Intense, target color space sRGB)
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼44% 0%
LG G5
124244 Points ∼42% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points ∼34% -24%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points ∼48% +10%
Google Nexus 6P
79502 Points ∼27% -38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
94122 Points ∼32% -27%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
165399 Points ∼56% +28%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
5450 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6480 (6415min) Points ∼10% +19%
LG G5
5507 Points ∼9% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
6556 Points ∼10% +20%
OnePlus 3
5645 Points ∼9% +4%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points ∼7% -16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
2080 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2170 (2120min) Points ∼44% +4%
LG G5
2396 Points ∼49% +15%
Huawei P9 Plus
1929 Points ∼39% -7%
OnePlus 3
2398 Points ∼49% +15%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points ∼27% -36%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
6326 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2805 Points ∼22% -56%
LG G5
6499 Points ∼51% +3%
OnePlus 3
7085 Points ∼56% +12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼13% +39%
LG G5
3833 Points ∼9% -3%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼10% +4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5630 Points ∼14% +43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼28% +24%
LG G5
1674 Points ∼26% +13%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼27% +19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3476 Points ∼54% +135%
ANDEBench PRO
3D (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
58.9 fps ∼45%
LG G5
47.42 fps ∼36% -19%
OnePlus 3
62.9 fps ∼48% +7%
Platform (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
404.1 Points ∼6%
LG G5
298.6 Points ∼4% -26%
OnePlus 3
246.4 Points ∼4% -39%
Storage (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
14580 KB/s ∼14%
LG G5
6137 KB/s ∼6% -58%
OnePlus 3
6959 KB/s ∼7% -52%
Memory Latency (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
5740 KOps/s ∼71%
LG G5
6035 KOps/s ∼75% +5%
OnePlus 3
6059 KOps/s ∼75% +6%
Memory Bandwidth (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
19176 MB/s ∼91%
LG G5
19035 MB/s ∼91% -1%
OnePlus 3
19937 MB/s ∼95% +4%
CoreMark-PRO/HPC (Base) (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
4834 Points ∼75%
LG G5
4959 Points ∼77% +3%
OnePlus 3
5098 Points ∼79% +5%
Device Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
15951 Points ∼61%
LG G5
13173 Points ∼51% -17%
OnePlus 3
13768 Points ∼53% -14%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼23% -39%
LG G5
5581 Points ∼28% -27%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points ∼36% -6%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points ∼36% -7%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points ∼24% -38%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼25% -12%
LG G5
2079 Points ∼25% -12%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points ∼24% -14%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼30% +6%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points ∼17% -40%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points ∼17% -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3097 Points ∼37% +31%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼8% -49%
LG G5
4807 Points ∼17% +11%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points ∼5% -65%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼17% +11%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points ∼8% -44%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points ∼7% -53%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6875 Points ∼24% +59%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼21% +20%
LG G5
2925 Points ∼15% -14%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points ∼20% +16%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼18% +4%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points ∼9% -47%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points ∼7% -59%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
6582 Points ∼33% +94%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
542 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points ∼11% +35%
LG G5
543 Points ∼8% 0%
OnePlus 3
631 Points ∼9% +16%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1177 Points ∼17% +117%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼2% -4%
LG G5
47 fps ∼1% -11%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps ∼1% -19%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼2% +13%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps ∼1% -38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps ∼1% -65%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
57.7 fps ∼2% +9%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼1% +5%
LG G5
74 fps ∼1% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps ∼0% -47%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼1% +16%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps ∼0% -43%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps ∼0% -65%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
92 fps ∼1% +19%
GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼3% -7%
LG G5
42 fps ∼3% +2%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps ∼1% -56%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼4% +15%
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps ∼2% -39%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps ∼1% -57%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
58.7 fps ∼5% +43%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼7% +4%
LG G5
30 fps ∼8% +15%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps ∼5% -27%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼13% +77%
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps ∼5% -35%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps ∼3% -55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
55.2 fps ∼15% +112%
GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼1% +4%
LG G5
31 fps ∼1% +15%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps ∼0% -63%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼1% +15%
Google Nexus 6P
16 fps ∼0% -41%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.3 fps ∼1% +53%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼0% 0%
LG G5
17 fps ∼0% +13%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps ∼0% -27%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼1% +100%
Google Nexus 6P
9.5 fps ∼0% -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
41.5 fps ∼1% +177%
GFXBench
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
16 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼0% -6%
LG G5
18 fps ∼0% +13%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼0% -61%
OnePlus 3
18 fps ∼0% +13%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
9.8 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼0% -19%
LG G5
11 fps ∼0% +12%
Huawei P9 Plus
6.8 fps ∼0% -31%
OnePlus 3
18 fps ∼1% +84%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼8% +14%
LG G5
28730 Points ∼8% +14%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points ∼6% -21%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼9% +20%
Google Nexus 6P
26876 Points ∼8% +7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
37746 Points ∼11% +50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼4% +24%
LG G5
32109 Points ∼4% +20%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points ∼3% -18%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼5% +28%
Google Nexus 6P
34758 Points ∼5% +30%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
63386 Points ∼8% +138%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼17% -6%
LG G5
20997 Points ∼18% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points ∼13% -27%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼18% +4%
Google Nexus 6P
14983 Points ∼13% -28%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
15626 Points ∼13% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points ∼37% +10%
LG G5
1695 Points ∼31% -7%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points ∼43% +28%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼33% -2%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points ∼21% -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1522 Points ∼28% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points ∼18% -19%
LG G5
4468 Points ∼27% +20%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points ∼6% -72%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼28% +25%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points ∼14% -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
4235 Points ∼25% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points ∼24% -10%
LG G5
3277 Points ∼29% +8%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points ∼11% -61%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼30% +13%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points ∼17% -38%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
3034 Points ∼27% 0%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
24.33 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps ∼34% -45%
LG G5
25.26 fps ∼65% +4%
OnePlus 3
23.32 fps ∼60% -4%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
59.8 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
60 fps ∼97% 0%
LG G5
55.8 fps ∼91% -7%
OnePlus 3
59.6 fps ∼97% 0%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
33028 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32273 Points ∼73% -2%
LG G5
25532 Points ∼58% -23%
OnePlus 3
33064 Points ∼75% 0%
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
41445 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
41091 Points ∼91% -1%
LG G5
28538 Points ∼63% -31%
OnePlus 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
33082 Points ∼74% -20%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
2461 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2131 Points ∼5% -13%
LG G5
2168 Points ∼5% -12%
OnePlus 3
1913 Points ∼4% -22%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2017 Points ∼4% -18%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
4781 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6382 Points ∼6% +33%
LG G5
5498 Points ∼6% +15%
OnePlus 3
5727 Points ∼6% +20%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
5495 Points ∼6% +15%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
8912 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6136 Points ∼0% -31%
LG G5
10573 Points ∼0% +19%
OnePlus 3
11024 Points ∼0% +24%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
25299 Points ∼0% +184%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
68378 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
36364 Points ∼18% -47%
LG G5
100164 Points ∼50% +46%
OnePlus 3
91875 Points ∼46% +34%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
48907 Points ∼25% -28%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
170521 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
225427 Points ∼30% +32%
LG G5
162632 Points ∼21% -5%
OnePlus 3
182968 Points ∼24% +7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
49294 Points ∼6% -71%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
8795 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8049 Points ∼22% -8%
LG G5
8724 Points ∼24% -1%
OnePlus 3
8196 Points ∼23% -7%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
8420 Points ∼23% -4%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
3155 ms * ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564 ms * ∼3% +19%
LG G5
3461 ms * ∼4% -10%
Huawei P9 Plus
2792 ms * ∼3% +12%
OnePlus 3
2921 ms * ∼3% +7%
Google Nexus 6P
4193 ms * ∼5% -33%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
5553 ms * ∼6% -76%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1103 ms * ∼1% +65%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points ∼14% +70%
LG G5
9731 Points ∼10% +25%
Huawei P9 Plus
12058 Points ∼12% +55%
OnePlus 3
9155 Points ∼9% +18%
Google Nexus 6P
8804 Points ∼9% +13%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
8059 Points ∼8% +4%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
26053 Points ∼27% +235%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
112 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
163 Points ∼20% +46%
LG G5
108 Points ∼13% -4%
Huawei P9 Plus
130 Points ∼16% +16%
OnePlus 3
122 Points ∼15% +9%
Google Nexus 6P
116 Points ∼14% +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
113 Points ∼14% +1%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
204 Points ∼25% +82%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.1 Points ∼16% +58%
LG G5
49.7 Points ∼11% +5%
Huawei P9 Plus
70 Points ∼15% +47%
OnePlus 3
54.4 Points ∼12% +15%
Google Nexus 6P
47.4 Points ∼10% 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
46 Points ∼10% -3%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
168.1 Points ∼37% +254%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
5344 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7198 (6255min) Points ∼95% +35%
LG G5
5473 (4080min) Points ∼72% +2%
OnePlus 3
5814 (5467min) Points ∼77% +9%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼42% +4%
LG G5
900 Points ∼38% -6%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points ∼44% +9%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼46% +16%
Google Nexus 6P
791 Points ∼33% -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points ∼35% -13%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1542 Points ∼64% +61%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
117.2 MB/s ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
86.7 MB/s ∼24% -26%
LG G5
89.3 MB/s ∼24% -24%
Huawei P9 Plus
39.33 MB/s ∼11% -66%
OnePlus 3
137.6 MB/s ∼37% +17%
Google Nexus 6P
20.1 MB/s ∼5% -83%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
74.9 MB/s ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15.79 MB/s ∼3% -79%
LG G5
16.22 MB/s ∼4% -78%
Huawei P9 Plus
51.2 MB/s ∼11% -32%
OnePlus 3
18.23 MB/s ∼4% -76%
Google Nexus 6P
11.79 MB/s ∼3% -84%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
168.3 MB/s ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
145.1 MB/s ∼9% -14%
LG G5
141.3 MB/s ∼9% -16%
Huawei P9 Plus
140.4 MB/s ∼9% -17%
OnePlus 3
153.3 MB/s ∼10% -9%
Google Nexus 6P
122.5 MB/s ∼8% -27%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
439.7 MB/s ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
487.3 MB/s ∼24% +11%
LG G5
427.6 MB/s ∼21% -3%
Huawei P9 Plus
284.3 MB/s ∼14% -35%
OnePlus 3
408.7 MB/s ∼20% -7%
Google Nexus 6P
236.3 MB/s ∼12% -46%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
45.64 MB/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
50.4 MB/s ∼58% +10%
LG G5
45.53 MB/s ∼52% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
24.95 MB/s ∼29% -45%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
78.5 MB/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
76.4 MB/s ∼50% -3%
LG G5
78.5 MB/s ∼51% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
62.5 MB/s ∼41% -20%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼23% -5%
LG G5
1478 Points ∼16% -33%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points ∼29% +22%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼23% -6%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points ∼13% -48%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points ∼22% -11%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
1319 Points ∼15% -40%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high29 fps
 very low29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high60 fps
Max. Load
 36.1 °C37.2 °C40.8 °C 
 35.8 °C37.3 °C42.4 °C 
 35.6 °C37.5 °C41.4 °C 
Maximum: 42.4 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
38.3 °C39.9 °C37.2 °C
39.4 °C40.6 °C36 °C
39.9 °C40.6 °C36.1 °C
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.636.22525.430.63125.328.54032.928.15033.638.26331.633.38028.428.4100272612520.825.81602230.920021.336.425020.844.731521.248.940019.453.750019.56163017.763.780017.969.8100017.872.8125017.373160017.472.8200016.773.3250017.274.4315018.273400017.973.1500017.670.8630017.770.5800017.870.91000017.971.91250018.166.61600018.261.4SPL3083.9N1.356.8median 17.9median 69.8Delta1.312.831.638.525.446.325.34832.945.933.646.631.650.728.449.12756.720.862.22268.421.373.620.876.421.276.919.476.519.580.817.778.917.981.817.883.317.38417.484.916.784.417.284.618.280.617.979.217.685.317.785.217.882.517.980.518.180.118.278.13095.21.3120.9median 17.9median 80.51.34.433.836.432.433.831.829.931.331.832.732.731.732.732.333.12632.345.446.139.445.429.630.736.229.629.525.228.629.525.923.125.425.925.623.421.325.637.124.723.337.150.127.122.550.156.234.622.456.261.840.421.361.864.74318.464.769.648.717.569.668.847.117.568.867.647.417.267.672.850.316.872.87552.217.37575.953.717.475.97652.116.67674.849.817.374.874.849.417.674.874.548.917.674.576.251.317.776.275.750.817.475.775.451.917.775.472.55117.972.571.150.518.171.164.247.518.164.286.462.729.886.46816.41.368median 71.1median 48.9median 17.7median 71.19.86.81.69.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Moto ZMotoMod JBL-SoundboostLG G5
Lenovo Moto Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

no name audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

LG G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.01 / 1.09 Watt
Load midlight 3.97 / 8.34 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Google Nexus 6P
3450 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Power Consumption
-15%
-38%
-11%
-22%
-29%
-172%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.63
5%
0.55
17%
0.87
-32%
0.57
14%
0.83
-26%
2.85
-332%
0.77
-17%
Idle Average *
1.01
1.1
-9%
1.37
-36%
1.2
-19%
1.24
-23%
1.09
-8%
2.95
-192%
2.04
-102%
Idle Maximum *
1.09
1.56
-43%
2.25
-106%
1.27
-17%
1.36
-25%
1.17
-7%
3.26
-199%
2.24
-106%
Load Average *
3.97
5.95
-50%
6.24
-57%
4.69
-18%
5.92
-49%
7.49
-89%
8.92
-125%
4.69
-18%
Load Maximum *
8.34
6.7
20%
9.12
-9%
5.63
32%
10.53
-26%
9.51
-14%
9.39
-13%
8.66
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
22h 51min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 53)
6h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 04min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 20min
Lenovo Moto Z
2600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
LG G5
2800 mAh
Huawei P9 Plus
3400 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Google Nexus 6P
3450 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
3340 mAh
Apple iPhone 7 Plus
2915 mAh
Battery Runtime
38%
-1%
6%
26%
-10%
-23%
15%
Reader / Idle
1371
1663
21%
1833
34%
1446
5%
1338
-2%
1447
6%
1078
-21%
1835
34%
H.264
724
914
26%
600
-17%
776
7%
847
17%
533
-26%
611
-16%
813
12%
WiFi v1.3
407
732
80%
387
-5%
530
30%
840
106%
375
-8%
369
-9%
587
44%
Load
320
392
23%
267
-17%
263
-18%
268
-16%
280
-12%
179
-44%
225
-30%

Pros

+ 轻盈纤薄的机身工艺上乘
+ 可拓展Moto模块
+ 无垃圾软件
+ 高速USB-C接口
+ microSD可以格式化作为内部存储
+ 高速无线AC标准
+ 优秀的通话功能
+ 准确的触控屏幕
+ 高分辨率屏幕
+ 可靠的指纹识别器
+ 高系统性能
+ 附赠快速充电器和保护壳

Cons

- 主相机拍照效果较弱
- 不支持Miracast
- 屏幕闪烁
- 未附赠耳机
- 集成电池
- 无3.5毫米耳机接口
In review: Lenovo Moto Z (XT1650-03). Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo Moto Z (XT1650-03). Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

联想的新旗舰智能手机Moto Z在与其他机型比较中最独特之处是模块拓展功能。这些叫做Moto Mods的模块可以带来新功能,它们目前通常都没有在智能手机上得到应用。这项功能的一个劣势可能是特制模块的售价会相对较高,不过联想宣称它们将会至少支持三代机型,这样对功能模块的投资将会有更高的长远价值。

不过Moto Z即使不算上这项功能也仍然是一台成功的智能手机,它在高端市场竞争中将不会有任何障碍:精致而纤薄的机身中搭载了强劲的部件,高价也带来了高品质。接近原生的安卓用户界面也会受到不少用户的偏爱。我们也为它较小容量电池带来的十分优秀续航时间所折服。

我们不太明白的是为什么联想只为Moto Z搭配了表现一般的相机——即使是采用Moto Z Force的2100万像素的传感器也会让它增色不少。一些潜在用户可能也会怀念3.5毫米耳机接口,尽管它随机附带了转换插头。

归功于Moto Mod概念设计,它在高端智能手机中独树一帜。不过Moto Z也可以凭借传统智能手机的特质让人满意。只是它主相机的表现有些落后于竞争机型。如果你喜欢模块化智能手机的概念,再购买Moto Z之前也可以考虑一下LG G5。这台LG机型没有太多的拓展空间,质感也稍差,不过搭配高端硬件配置的它售价已经降到了约450欧元(约3374人民币)——这可比我们的测试机便宜了太多。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Lenovo Moto Z - 09/26/2016 v5.1(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 94%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
55 / 60 → 92%
Weight
93%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
60 / 63 → 94%
Application Performance
64 / 70 → 91%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
73%
Average
80%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 Moto Z 智能手机简短评测
Andreas Kilian, 2016-10- 1 (Update: 2016-10- 1)