Notebookcheck Logo

华为 P10 Lite 智能手机简短评测

明智选择。 华为P10 Lite中端智能手机售价只有搭配徕卡镜头的华为P10的一半,不过除此之外可以提供接近高端的硬件配置。我们的测试将会分析它和P10机型的区别,以及如何在两台设备之间作出选择。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Huawei P10 Lite (P10 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 658 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Memory
4 GB 
Display
5.20 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 19.9 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD卡最高支持256 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 指纹感应器,加速感应器,亮度感应器,近距感应器,陀螺仪,指南针, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct, Link+Live
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1.900, 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (800, 900, 1.800, 2.100, 2.600 MHz), 下载速度最高 300 MBit/s, 上传速度最高 50 MBit/s, Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.2 x 146.5 x 72
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix PDAF, CAF, 传感器尺寸 1/2.8", 像素尺寸 1,25 µm
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 位于底部的单扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, Micro-USB数据线,电源适配器,耳机,快速开始说明, EMUI 5.1, Google-Apps, Samsung HiCare, HiGame, File manager, Telephone manager, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
146 g, Power Supply: 35 g
Price
349 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite
Huawei P10 Lite (Foto: Huawei)

Size Comparison

153 mm 76.6 mm 9.8 mm 155 g151.8 mm 75.7 mm 7.3 mm 162 g150.9 mm 76.2 mm 8.2 mm 162 g146.5 mm 72 mm 7.2 mm 146 g145.3 mm 69.3 mm 6.98 mm 144 g135.4 mm 66.2 mm 7.9 mm 138 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (154min) MBit/s +48%
Huawei P10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 658, 32 GB eMMC Flash
232 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
225 MBit/s -3%
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
57.9 MBit/s -75%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.5 MBit/s -78%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei P10
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
308 (48.8min) MBit/s +34%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Mali-T830 MP2, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s +33%
Huawei P10 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 658, 32 GB eMMC Flash
229 MBit/s
Honor 6X
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 655, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.6 MBit/s -76%
Huawei Nova Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s -77%
Huawei P10 Lite: complete route
Huawei P10 Lite: complete route
Huawei P10 Lite: bridge
Huawei P10 Lite: bridge
Huawei P10 Lite: forest
Huawei P10 Lite: forest
Garmin Edge 500: complete route
Garmin Edge 500: complete route
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: bridge
Garmin Edge 500: forest
Garmin Edge 500: forest

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
525
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
499
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 525 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 509.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 507 cd/m²
Contrast: 1408:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Huawei P10 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 4.70
Honor 6X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Huawei Nova Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Huawei P10
LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.10
Screen
34%
-10%
-4%
1%
2%
Brightness middle
507
574
13%
547
8%
485
-4%
609
20%
547
8%
Brightness
509
576
13%
540
6%
481
-6%
589
16%
556
9%
Brightness Distribution
95
94
-1%
94
-1%
90
-5%
87
-8%
86
-9%
Black Level *
0.36
0.57
-58%
0.5
-39%
0.63
-75%
0.43
-19%
Contrast
1408
960
-32%
970
-31%
967
-31%
1272
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.1
2.4
53%
5.1
-0%
4.2
18%
3.8
25%
4.8
6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9
3.8
58%
9.1
-1%
7.9
12%
8.3
8%
8.8
2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.1
1.9
69%
6.2
-2%
4.8
21%
3.1
49%
4.5
26%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.09 105%
2.09 105%
2.36 93%
2.06 107%
2.39 92%
CCT
8143 80%
6502 100%
6546 99%
7568 86%
6725 97%
7194 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18034 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
60438 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
45549 Points -25%
Honor 6X
56764 Points -6%
Huawei Nova Plus
64601 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
45232 Points -25%
Huawei P10
140084 Points +132%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
874 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
682 Points -22%
Honor 6X
788 Points -10%
Huawei Nova Plus
845 Points -3%
Huawei P10
1935 Points +121%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
3348 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3292 Points -2%
Honor 6X
3341 Points 0%
Huawei Nova Plus
3156 Points -6%
Huawei P10
6036 Points +80%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
11135 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
8550 Points -23%
Honor 6X
11775 Points +6%
Honor 6X
11775 Points +6%
Huawei Nova Plus
13882 Points +25%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9717 Points -13%
Huawei P10
27692 Points +149%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
10603 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7793 Points -27%
Honor 6X
11353 Points +7%
Honor 6X
11353 Points +7%
Huawei Nova Plus
13412 Points +26%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9773 Points -8%
Huawei P10
35964 Points +239%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
13510 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12954 Points -4%
Honor 6X
13535 Points 0%
Honor 6X
13535 Points 0%
Huawei Nova Plus
15823 Points +17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9527 Points -29%
Huawei P10
15341 Points +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
610 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
490 Points -20%
Honor 6X
550 Points -10%
Huawei Nova Plus
844 Points +38%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
667 Points +9%
Huawei P10
2649 Points +334%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
520 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
407 Points -22%
Honor 6X
468 Points -10%
Huawei Nova Plus
733 Points +41%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
605 Points +16%
Huawei P10
2816 Points +442%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
1537 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1699 Points +11%
Honor 6X
1433 Points -7%
Huawei Nova Plus
1795 Points +17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1042 Points -32%
Huawei P10
2193 Points +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
396 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
312 Points -21%
Honor 6X
385 Points -3%
Huawei Nova Plus
465 Points +17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
386 Points -3%
Huawei P10
2274 Points +474%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
326 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
253 Points -22%
Honor 6X
318 Points -2%
Huawei Nova Plus
384 Points +18%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
327 Points 0%
Huawei P10
2409 Points +639%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1670 Points +5%
Honor 6X
1440 Points -10%
Huawei Nova Plus
1773 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1045 Points -34%
Huawei P10
1902 Points +19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
18 fps
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
19 fps +6%
Honor 6X
19 fps +6%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps +28%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
18 fps 0%
Huawei P10
55 fps +206%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
17 fps
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
12 fps -29%
Honor 6X
18 fps +6%
Huawei Nova Plus
23 fps +35%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
17 fps 0%
Huawei P10
69 fps +306%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
7.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9.8 fps +27%
Honor 6X
8.5 fps +10%
Huawei Nova Plus
10 fps +30%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
7 fps -9%
Huawei P10
32 fps +316%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
7.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5 fps -31%
Honor 6X
4.6 fps -36%
Huawei Nova Plus
9.9 fps +38%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
6.6 fps -8%
Huawei P10
30 fps +317%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
7.3 fps +52%
Honor 6X
4.9 fps +2%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.6 fps +38%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
4.6 fps -4%
Huawei P10
25 fps +421%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
4.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3.2 fps -24%
Honor 6X
2.5 fps -40%
Huawei Nova Plus
6.2 fps +48%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
4.2 fps 0%
Huawei P10
24 fps +471%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
5794 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
5000 Points -14%
Honor 6X
4383 Points -24%
Huawei Nova Plus
5724 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
Points -100%
Huawei P10
7341 Points +27%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
1229 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1000 Points -19%
Honor 6X
1300 Points +6%
Huawei Nova Plus
1262 Points +3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
283 Points -77%
Huawei P10
2621 Points +113%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
2642 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2185 Points -17%
Honor 6X
2721 Points +3%
Huawei Nova Plus
2132 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1359 Points -49%
Huawei P10
3830 Points +45%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
1296 Points -19%
Honor 6X
1779 Points +12%
Huawei Nova Plus
1553 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
604 Points -62%
Huawei P10
2778 Points +74%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
829 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
529 Points -36%
Honor 6X
819 Points -1%
Huawei Nova Plus
1015 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
805 Points -3%
Huawei P10
4115 Points +396%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
654 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
666 Points +2%
Honor 6X
720 Points +10%
Huawei Nova Plus
754 Points +15%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
10 Points -98%
Huawei P10
1077 Points +65%

Legend

 
Huawei P10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 658, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 6X HiSilicon Kirin 655, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
4589 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
3799 Points -17%
Honor 6X
4199 Points -8%
Huawei Nova Plus
4730 Points +3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3656 Points -20%
Huawei P10
10236 Points +123%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
8591 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
9669 ms * -13%
Honor 6X
9373 ms * -9%
Huawei Nova Plus
8028 ms * +7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
11102 ms * -29%
Huawei P10
3129 ms * +64%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
62 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
64 Points +3%
Honor 6X
73 Points +18%
Huawei Nova Plus
83 Points +34%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
61 Points -2%
Huawei P10
136 Points +119%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P10 Lite
30.05 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
23.28 Points -23%
Honor 6X
26.46 Points -12%
Huawei Nova Plus
31.3 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
22.8 Points -24%
Huawei P10
57.9 Points +93%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P10 LiteSamsung Galaxy A3 2017Honor 6XHuawei Nova PlusLenovo Moto G4 PlusHuawei P10
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
9%
-10%
9%
174%
Sequential Read 256KB
264.3
199.7
-24%
283.4
7%
241.6
-9%
271.4
3%
738
179%
Sequential Write 256KB
129.2
45.96
-64%
73.8
-43%
82.1
-36%
43.48
-66%
189.8
47%
Random Read 4KB
72.5
22.32
-69%
39.55
-45%
35.64
-51%
36.32
-50%
168.4
132%
Random Write 4KB
19.36
9.62
-50%
45.05
133%
30.12
56%
35.79
85%
152.3
687%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
53.4
75.5
41%
52
-3%
41.64
-22%
74.4
39%
54.2
1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
32.7
50.1
53%
34.53
6%
33.32
2%
46.92
43%
32.19
-2%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high22 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high51 fps
Max. Load
 33 °C30.6 °C30.8 °C 
 34.5 °C31.6 °C34.9 °C 
 33.5 °C31.7 °C34.4 °C 
Maximum: 34.9 °C
Average: 32.8 °C
32.4 °C32.2 °C34.4 °C
32 °C32.4 °C35 °C
31.9 °C32.4 °C34.1 °C
Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 33 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.62929.62528.428.628.43127.729.427.74028.832.828.85028.628.828.66325.72525.78024.925.424.910026.627.726.612534.228.734.216033.521.833.520043.621.843.625048.822.348.83155421.15440058.721.658.750060.921.360.963062.718.162.780065.220.365.2100067.319.667.3125069.419.569.4160073.616.373.6200074.116.174.1250075.715.675.7315075.415.575.4400068.115.468.1500072.615.172.6630074.115.274.1800076.215.176.21000076.815.176.81250070.71570.71600055.815.155.8SPL8529.785N59.61.359.6median 67.3median 18.1median 67.3Delta10.63.410.631.636.625.431.525.331.732.931.133.627.131.631.528.429.32729.820.832.62240.821.344.720.85021.254.419.461.219.564.617.769.317.972.717.875.517.372.817.472.416.77117.272.118.272.817.969.117.663.717.760.517.856.717.959.718.15018.245.63082.61.351.2median 17.9median 61.21.41131.642.625.437.525.334.632.931.333.630.931.632.428.429.72728.420.829.22231.721.336.920.84621.252.319.455.819.559.117.760.817.966.617.871.517.37517.472.316.772.717.271.618.270.717.967.617.666.617.761.617.856.517.957.118.156.918.242.23081.91.346.3median 17.9median 59.11.411hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P10 LiteSamsung Galaxy A3 2017Honor 6X
Huawei P10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A3 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor 6X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.14 / 0.17 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.38 / 1.87 / 1.92 Watt
Load midlight 3.82 / 4.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Huawei P10 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
44%
-23%
2%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
0.38
0.37
3%
0.82
-116%
0.49
-29%
0.63
-66%
Idle Average *
1.87
0.78
58%
2
-7%
1.63
13%
1.91
-2%
Idle Maximum *
1.92
0.84
56%
2.03
-6%
1.76
8%
1.96
-2%
Load Average *
3.82
1.52
60%
3.34
13%
2.98
22%
3.88
-2%
Load Maximum *
4.9
2.75
44%
4.92
-0%
4.99
-2%
8.74
-78%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 30min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 46min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 46min
Huawei P10 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A3 2017
2350 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Huawei Nova Plus
3340 mAh
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Huawei P10
3200 mAh
Battery Runtime
65%
47%
30%
0%
4%
Reader / Idle
1410
2862
103%
2250
60%
2048
45%
1226
-13%
1540
9%
H.264
586
988
69%
885
51%
732
25%
775
32%
582
-1%
WiFi v1.3
665
668
0%
957
44%
820
23%
735
11%
966
45%
Load
286
532
86%
375
31%
366
28%
201
-30%
176
-38%

Pros

+ 高品质机身
+ 双SIM卡
+ LTE和NFC
+ 高速5GHz无线
+ 高品质相机
+ 不错的电池续航
+ 低发热量
+ 无降频

Cons

- 无USB-C接口
- 混合双SIM卡插槽
- 不支持App2SD
- 预装垃圾软件多
- 不是所有游戏都可以流畅运行
-
In review: Huawei P10 Lite. Test unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Huawei P10 Lite. Test unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

华为没有作出太多让步:P10 Lite是更昂贵的P10(近600欧元,约4431人民币)的不错备选方案。相比它的高端师兄,这台中端设备采用了品质出色的机身,给人以远高于它350欧元(约2585人民币)价位的质感。尽管P10 Lite没有搭配华为P10的徕卡镜头,但1200万像素的主相机也提供了十分优秀的拍摄质量。

我们也十分喜欢它的明亮屏幕和其他功能如高速无线模组,LTE Cat.6支持,和双SIM功能,可惜其中一个SIM和microSD共用卡槽。它的电池续航时间中规中矩,应该可以满足一整天的使用。

如果你不需要华为P10的更快处理器和徕卡镜头,那么华为P10 Lite是个不错的选择。售价仅350欧元(约2585人民币)的这台5.2寸中端设备是P10系列机型中价位最低的一款。

华为节省成本的方面包括USB 2.0,它采用了较老的Micro-USB接口而非C型接口,让用户在连接充电器时仍然会遇到”啊,方向反了“的问题。遗憾的是,它不支持将应用安装在microSD卡上,特别是考虑到它臃肿的预装系统让32GB闪存仅剩20GB给用户支配。不过幸好用户可以自行删除不需要的软件来腾出一些空间。它的处理器表现平平。华为P10 Lite“几乎”可以运行所有游戏,不过显示效果设定可能需要有所降低来满足流畅的帧率。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Huawei P10 Lite - 04/12/2017 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 94%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
42 / 60 → 70%
Weight
93%
Battery
92%
Display
86%
Games Performance
21 / 63 → 33%
Application Performance
50 / 70 → 71%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
76%
Average
75%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 P10 Lite 智能手机简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2017-04-22 (Update: 2017-04-23)