Notebookcheck Logo

一加 3T 智能手机简短评测

旗舰2.0。在不到六个月的时间里,一加推出了其高端智能手机一加3T(一加3的后继产品)。我们将找出哪些改进是有卓有成效的,以及是否值得升级设备。
Android Touchscreen Smartphone
OnePlus 3T (3 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 4 x 2.4 GHz, Kryo
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容式, 10点触控, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, Optic-AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50.61 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 耳机插孔, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Fingerprint, Hall, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Abmient light, eCompass, BeiDou
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (band 1, 2, 5, 8), LTE Cat. 6 (band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40), Nano-SIM, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.35 x 152.7 x 74.7
Battery
0 Wh, 3400 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (Sony IMX 298, 1.12 µm, OIS, phase recognition autofocus (PDAF), f/2.0, UHD Video, RAW Support, Auto HDR)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (Samsung 3P8SP, 1.0 µm, EIS, Fixed Focus, f/2.0, 1080p Video)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono speaker, Keyboard: virtual, Power adapter, USB cable, SIM tool, Quick-start guide, OxygenOS 3.5, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
158 g, Power Supply: 100 g
Price
439 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

Size Comparison

152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 158 g152.7 mm 74.7 mm 7.35 mm 161 g145.9 mm 71.9 mm 9 mm 161 g145 mm 70.9 mm 6.95 mm 144 g142.4 mm 69.6 mm 7.9 mm 152 g138.3 mm 67.1 mm 7.1 mm 138 g

Connectivity

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
485 MBit/s ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
335 MBit/s ∼69% +7%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
323 MBit/s ∼67% +3%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
313 MBit/s ∼65%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 MBit/s ∼38% -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7
A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)
532 MBit/s ∼100% +107%
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
320 MBit/s ∼60% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
281 MBit/s ∼53% +9%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
279 MBit/s ∼52% +9%
OnePlus 3T
Adreno 530, SD 821, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
257 MBit/s ∼48%
OnePlus 3T: Overview
OnePlus 3T: Overview
OnePlus 3T: Forest
OnePlus 3T: Forest
OnePlus 3T: Bridge
OnePlus 3T: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Forest
Garmin Edge 500: Forest
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge
Garmin Edge 500: Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images

Display

468
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 471 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 429.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.76 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 421 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
Gamma: 2.23
OnePlus 3T
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Apple iPhone 7
IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
HTC 10
Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.20
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.20
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50
Samsung Galaxy S7
SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.10
Screen
50%
31%
33%
19%
35%
Brightness middle
421
556
32%
445
6%
582
38%
419
0%
350
-17%
Brightness
430
519
21%
434
1%
563
31%
431
0%
351
-18%
Brightness Distribution
84
90
7%
93
11%
91
8%
84
0%
98
17%
Black Level *
0.34
0.36
0.38
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.1
1.3
82%
2.8
61%
4.4
38%
4.1
42%
2.04
71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15.3
2.6
83%
5.8
62%
7.4
52%
12
22%
3.25
79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.8
1.9
72%
3.7
46%
4.8
29%
3.3
51%
1.63
76%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.26 97%
2.31 95%
2.2 100%
2.1 105%
2.07 106%
CCT
7866 83%
6818 95%
7164 91%
6175 105%
6550 99%
6391 102%
Contrast
1635
1236
1532
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.15
77.78
89.38
86.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.71
99.44
100
99.35

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 244 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 244 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 244 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21860 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.


ColorChecker (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Custom, target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Custom, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (Custom, target color space: sRGB)
Colorspace (Custom, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Custom, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Custom, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Custom, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation Sweeps (Custom, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Performance

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
159866 Points ∼54%
Apple iPhone 7
142532 Points ∼49% -11%
HTC 10
131866 Points ∼45% -18%
Huawei P9
95743 Points ∼33% -40%
OnePlus 3
142090 Points ∼48% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S7
127902 Points ∼44% -20%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1881 Points ∼29%
Apple iPhone 7
3490 Points ∼54% +86%
Huawei P9
1755 Points ∼27% -7%
OnePlus 3
1754 Points ∼27% -7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
4236 Points ∼10%
Apple iPhone 7
5585 Points ∼14% +32%
Huawei P9
4904 Points ∼12% +16%
OnePlus 3
4097 Points ∼10% -3%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
30810 Points ∼9%
Apple iPhone 7
37676 Points ∼11% +22%
HTC 10
27176 Points ∼8% -12%
Huawei P9
19854 Points ∼6% -36%
OnePlus 3
30241 Points ∼9% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
29015 Points ∼8% -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
34494 Points ∼5%
Apple iPhone 7
63974 Points ∼9% +85%
HTC 10
30061 Points ∼4% -13%
Huawei P9
21577 Points ∼3% -37%
OnePlus 3
34023 Points ∼5% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7
33348 Points ∼4% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
22426 Points ∼19%
Apple iPhone 7
15450 Points ∼13% -31%
HTC 10
20344 Points ∼17% -9%
Huawei P9
15517 Points ∼13% -31%
OnePlus 3
21771 Points ∼18% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
19944 Points ∼17% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2577 Points ∼23%
Apple iPhone 7
2964 Points ∼26% +15%
HTC 10
3157 Points ∼28% +23%
Huawei P9
1237 Points ∼11% -52%
OnePlus 3
3424 Points ∼30% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2715 Points ∼24% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
3310 Points ∼20%
Apple iPhone 7
4057 Points ∼24% +23%
HTC 10
4581 Points ∼27% +38%
Huawei P9
1080 Points ∼6% -67%
OnePlus 3
4633 Points ∼28% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S7
3018 Points ∼18% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1452 Points ∼27%
Apple iPhone 7
1525 Points ∼28% +5%
HTC 10
1512 Points ∼28% +4%
Huawei P9
2510 Points ∼46% +73%
OnePlus 3
1789 Points ∼33% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2010 Points ∼37% +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2221 Points ∼11%
HTC 10
2495 Points ∼12% +12%
Huawei P9
974 Points ∼5% -56%
OnePlus 3
2571 Points ∼13% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2170 Points ∼11% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2418 Points ∼21%
HTC 10
2889 Points ∼25% +19%
Huawei P9
829 Points ∼7% -66%
OnePlus 3
2864 Points ∼25% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2216 Points ∼19% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1728 Points ∼29%
HTC 10
1688 Points ∼29% -2%
Huawei P9
2503 Points ∼42% +45%
OnePlus 3
1892 Points ∼32% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2022 Points ∼34% +17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
59 fps ∼2%
Apple iPhone 7
57.7 fps ∼2% -2%
HTC 10
43 fps ∼1% -27%
Huawei P9
43 fps ∼1% -27%
OnePlus 3
60 fps ∼2% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
53 fps ∼2% -10%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
91 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone 7
110.3 fps ∼1% +21%
HTC 10
73 fps ∼1% -20%
Huawei P9
40 fps ∼0% -56%
OnePlus 3
89 fps ∼1% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
84 fps ∼1% -8%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
45 fps ∼12%
Apple iPhone 7
58.5 fps ∼16% +30%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼7% -47%
Huawei P9
19 fps ∼5% -58%
OnePlus 3
46 fps ∼13% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
27 fps ∼7% -40%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
46 fps ∼4%
Apple iPhone 7
60.7 fps ∼5% +32%
HTC 10
39 fps ∼3% -15%
Huawei P9
18 fps ∼1% -61%
OnePlus 3
47 fps ∼4% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S7
40 fps ∼3% -13%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone 7
59.4 fps ∼2% +86%
HTC 10
14 fps ∼0% -56%
Huawei P9
11 fps ∼0% -66%
OnePlus 3
30 fps ∼1% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7
15 fps ∼0% -53%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
32 fps ∼1%
Apple iPhone 7
42.2 fps ∼1% +32%
HTC 10
24 fps ∼1% -25%
Huawei P9
10 fps ∼0% -69%
OnePlus 3
31 fps ∼1% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7
28 fps ∼1% -12%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
5664 Points ∼28%
HTC 10
5809 Points ∼29% +3%
Huawei P9
7058 Points ∼35% +25%
OnePlus 3
7101 Points ∼36% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4826 Points ∼24% -15%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2218 Points ∼26%
Apple iPhone 7
2999 Points ∼35% +35%
HTC 10
2193 Points ∼26% -1%
Huawei P9
2025 Points ∼24% -9%
OnePlus 3
2496 Points ∼30% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1987 Points ∼24% -10%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
3130 Points ∼16%
Apple iPhone 7
6097 Points ∼31% +95%
HTC 10
2806 Points ∼14% -10%
Huawei P9
3930 Points ∼20% +26%
OnePlus 3
3537 Points ∼18% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7
4217 Points ∼21% +35%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
1954 Points ∼22%
Apple iPhone 7
1257 Points ∼14% -36%
HTC 10
1772 Points ∼20% -9%
Huawei P9
2627 Points ∼29% +34%
OnePlus 3
2052 Points ∼23% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2244 Points ∼25% +15%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
4444 Points ∼15%
Apple iPhone 7
6896 Points ∼24% +55%
HTC 10
5009 Points ∼17% +13%
Huawei P9
1583 Points ∼5% -64%
OnePlus 3
4813 Points ∼17% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7
1723 Points ∼6% -61%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
891 Points ∼37%
Apple iPhone 7
1531 Points ∼64% +72%
HTC 10
928 Points ∼39% +4%
Huawei P9
1029 Points ∼43% +15%
OnePlus 3
1112 Points ∼46% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S7
957 Points ∼40% +7%

Legend

 
OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe
 
HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
9798 Points ∼10%
Apple iPhone 7
24875 Points ∼26% +154%
HTC 10
8905 Points ∼9% -9%
Huawei P9
11783 Points ∼12% +20%
OnePlus 3
9155 Points ∼9% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
13161 Points ∼14% +34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
2719 ms * ∼3%
Apple iPhone 7
1113 ms * ∼1% +59%
HTC 10
3146 ms * ∼4% -16%
Huawei P9
2923 ms * ∼3% -8%
OnePlus 3
2921 ms * ∼3% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7
2562 ms * ∼3% +6%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
135 Points ∼17%
Apple iPhone 7
202 Points ∼25% +50%
HTC 10
108 Points ∼13% -20%
Huawei P9
128 Points ∼16% -5%
OnePlus 3
122 Points ∼15% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7
166 Points ∼21% +23%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 3T
54.5 Points ∼12%
Apple iPhone 7
165.9 Points ∼36% +204%
HTC 10
52.1 Points ∼11% -4%
Huawei P9
68.4 Points ∼15% +26%
OnePlus 3
54.4 Points ∼12% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7
74 Points ∼16% +36%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 3TApple iPhone 7HTC 10Huawei P9OnePlus 3Samsung Galaxy S7
AndroBench 3-5
-56%
-49%
-19%
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
436.4
275.1
-37%
281.3
-36%
408.7
-6%
483.8
11%
Sequential Write 256KB
165.3
115.6
-30%
72.2
-56%
153.3
-7%
145.7
-12%
Random Read 4KB
123.6
29.92
-76%
39
-68%
137.6
11%
85.9
-31%
Random Write 4KB
74.4
15.89
-79%
47.45
-36%
18.23
-75%
16.01
-78%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.3
55
72.3
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.4
24.83
53.6
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high59 fps

Emissions

Max. Load
 36.9 °C33.7 °C32.9 °C 
 39.4 °C33.9 °C32.5 °C 
 39.2 °C34.2 °C32.2 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 35 °C
34.7 °C35.8 °C37.5 °C
34.7 °C36 °C36.7 °C
34.6 °C36.2 °C37.4 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 36 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33.8 °C | Room Temperature 22.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.128.726.1252625.2263125.42725.44025.829.325.85025.226.125.26323.123.823.18033.430.833.410036.13336.112535.428.935.416034.724.734.720043.324.943.325049.71949.731553.319.153.340056.520.456.550059.318.159.363063.617.563.680064.71764.7100068.815.968.8125069.114.569.1160070.713.770.7200072.614.372.6250075.813.475.8315074.213.674.2400075.513.375.5500074.312.974.3630071.812.771.8800071.81371.81000072.212.772.21250066.61366.6160005512.755SPL84.427.584.4N56.9156.9median 66.6median 14.5median 66.6Delta9.83.69.840.136.832.440.1382731.33834.330.631.734.334.529.72634.544.138.139.444.140.529.736.240.53331.428.63326.827.625.426.826.924.421.326.93724.823.33745.529.522.545.551.636.222.451.657.341.721.357.359.746.618.459.766.452.517.566.468.45217.568.469.952.517.269.971.853.816.871.872.554.817.372.575.256.917.475.278.459.716.678.477.659.717.377.678.260.817.678.281.363.817.681.378.561.817.778.575.958.817.475.976.259.417.776.274.357.517.974.370.354.818.170.354.437.618.154.488.671.129.888.67325.81.373median 70.3median 53.8median 17.7median 70.311.910.41.611.929.635.529.628.529.528.526.328.226.329.631.529.627.927.427.925.125.725.124.729.424.733.831.333.843.732.143.742.620.442.64620.84647.920.247.950.419.750.451.922.351.960.820.160.866.318.966.367.517.767.567.116.767.166.91766.97014.87072.915.972.965.914.665.971.514.471.574.714.174.774.813.874.873.413.773.472.613.872.662.313.762.355.213.755.255.113.655.183.128.683.154.11.254.1median 65.9median 16.7median 65.910.53.410.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 3TOnePlus 3Apple iPhone 7
OnePlus 3T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

OnePlus 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Frequency Comparison (Checkboxes select/deselectable!)

Energy Management

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.61 / 1.77 / 1.81 Watt
Load midlight 6.67 / 10.98 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
28%
0%
3%
15%
26%
Idle Minimum *
0.61
0.54
11%
0.68
-11%
0.77
-26%
0.57
7%
0.68
-11%
Idle Average *
1.77
1.51
15%
1.49
16%
2.36
-33%
1.24
30%
1.02
42%
Idle Maximum *
1.81
1.54
15%
1.91
-6%
2.37
-31%
1.36
25%
1.14
37%
Load Average *
6.67
3.75
44%
7.4
-11%
3.09
54%
5.92
11%
4.73
29%
Load Maximum *
10.98
5.01
54%
9.71
12%
5.35
51%
10.53
4%
7.16
35%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
23h 43min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 42min
OnePlus 3T
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone 7
1960 mAh
HTC 10
3000 mAh
Huawei P9
3000 mAh
OnePlus 3
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-19%
-9%
16%
4%
Reader / Idle
1423
1770
24%
1273
-11%
1514
6%
1338
-6%
1810
27%
H.264
810
722
-11%
648
-20%
568
-30%
847
5%
892
10%
WiFi v1.3
494
517
5%
413
-16%
569
15%
840
70%
456
-8%
Load
282
126
-55%
203
-28%
206
-27%
268
-5%
242
-14%

Pros

+ 高品质机身
+ 高端性能无需节流
+ 优秀相机
+ 快速存储
+ 高速WLAN
+ 双SIM卡
+ 通知拨杆
+ USB-C
+ 高达128GB的内部存储
+ 良好的语音质量与噪声抑制
+ 优秀的显示效果
+ 快速充电
+ 电池续航时间长

Cons

- 只有LTE Cat. 6
- 取决于区域的不同频率
- 无法拓展存储
- 没有FM收音机
- 摄像头不如以前清晰
- 无红外感应
- 扬声器存在静电干扰
- 没有附送耳机
In review: OnePlus 3T. Test model courtesy of OnePlus Germany.
In review: OnePlus 3T. Test model courtesy of OnePlus Germany.

一加3T是一加3名副其实的继承者。然而,由于之前机型已经是最好的高端安卓手机之一了,对制造商来说它并不算是个挑战。而一加3T的改动很小,这同样是问题所在。

成功的更新:一加3T仅仅是一加3的一个小升级,所以它和旧款一样是最好的高端智能手机之一。 

 如果您已经拥有一加3,则没有必要购买一加3T,而其他情况下可以选购。终于推出的128GB版本可能会给消费者不小的惊喜。在一加在线商店里,它仅比64GB版本贵40欧元(约42美元),由于缺少microSD卡读卡器,这显得很值得玩味。略快的系统芯片是个不错的改进,但实际上由于温度相似,它们的实际性能表现区别很小。

一加为新款3T配备了更大容量的电池,但是由于功耗更高,它的续航仍然和一加3差不多。我们不想夸大无线连接测试的结果,毕竟之前的型号在一开始也存在着同样的问题,这个问题在一个OxygenOS的更新中被修复。据称安卓7的更新将会在12月发布。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

 

 

 

OnePlus 3T - 12/12/2016 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
48 / 60 → 80%
Weight
92%
Battery
92%
Display
83%
Games Performance
64 / 63 → 100%
Application Performance
63 / 70 → 90%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
53 / 91 → 58%
Camera
77%
Average
78%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 一加 3T 智能手机简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2016-12-18 (Update: 2018-05-15)