Motorola Edge 70 Max 智能手机评测 – 创纪录的续航表现与旗舰级功能，价格亲民

Name: Motorola Edge 70 Max
Brand: Motorola

全面拥抱电池动力。

在电池续航方面，Samsung 和 Apple 的旗舰手机也难以与 Motorola Edge 70 Max 抗衡：它的设计毫不妥协地围绕一块超大容量电池展开，却并未因此显得笨重，而且如今的售价也相当亲民。不过，它有什么缺点吗？
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/21/2026 🇩🇪 🇺🇸 🇪🇸 ...
5G Android ARM Smartphone

Motorola Edge 70 Max 评测结论

Motorola 如今凭借 Edge 70 Max，在旗下产品阵容中也拥有了自己的旗舰杀手：这款价格亲民的智能手机能够与贵得多的手机一较高下，甚至在续航等方面超越它们。

这款手机在我们的续航测试中坚持了近 28 小时，同时还拥有明亮的屏幕、充沛的性能，以及做工坚固的时尚铝制机身。不过，耐用性稍逊的 Gorilla Glass 7i 可能意味着它在跌落时不那么耐摔。

高速 Wi-Fi、良好的卫星定位、表现不错的扬声器以及可靠的触摸屏，让这款手机的整体配置更加全面。

Test device courtesy of Motorola Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

在存储方面则不得不有所妥协：厂商仅提供 256 GB 的存储空间，如果你有大量照片和视频，很快就会不够用。承诺的更新支持期限也不算特别长，这一直是 Motorola 的一个老问题。

总体而言，如果你正在寻找一款性能强劲、续航持久，而且如今价格也真正亲民的手机，Edge 70 Max 仍然值得入手。

Pros

+ 近 28 小时的电池续航

+ 价格实惠

+ 高端坚固的铝制机身，具备 IP69 防护等级

+ 明亮的 144 Hz 显示屏

+ 性能强劲，配备高速 UFS 4.1 存储

+ 高速无线网络连接

+ 主摄像头成像清晰，即使在弱光下也不例外

Cons

- 仅有 256 GB 存储空间，不支持存储扩展

- 更新支持有限，且相关信息存在矛盾

- USB 2.0，不支持有线视频输出

- 满载时发热明显

- 167 Hz PWM 频闪

- 无变焦摄像头，超广角摄像头表现欠佳

- Gorilla Glass 7i 耐用性较差

- 欧盟版包装内不含充电器

价格和供货情况

Motorola Edge 70 Max 已在欧洲和印度上市，例如可通过 Motorola 印度官网购买。

建议零售价约为 900 美元，不过部分网店的售价已经便宜了很多。

$564.50
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Dual-SIM 256GB ROM + 8GB RAM (GSM Only | No CDMA) Factory Unlocked 5G Smartphone (Pantone Titan) - International Version
$519.50
Motorola Moto Edge 70 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB+12GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.67" Curved XT2601-3 Latino American Version (Gadget Gray)
$380.00
Motorola Moto Edge 70 Fusion 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB+8GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.8" Curved XT2605-3 Latino American Version (Pantone Silhouette (Blue))

Motorola Edge 70 Max 评测结论
规格
保护壳 – 防水 Motorola 手机
功能 – Edge 70 Max 的存储空间有限
软件 – Motorola，更新情况尚不确定
通信与 GNSS – Edge 70 Max 提供高速互联网连接
电话功能和通话音质 – 支持 eSIM 的 Motorola 手机
相机 – Motorola 拍照表现出色的手机
配件与保修 – Edge 70 享有 2 年保修
输入设备与操作 – 快速指纹传感器
显示屏 – Moto 手机上的 AMOLED 屏幕亮度极高
性能 – 性能强劲的手机
排放 – Motorola 表面温度较高
电池续航 – 续航出色的Motorola手机
Notebookcheck 综合评分
可能的替代方案对比

规格

Motorola Edge 70 Max (Edge 70 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 3.8 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.3 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 829

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.82 inch 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 510 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 206 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B66/B71), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n71/n75/n77/n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 163 x 77

Battery

7100 mAh Silicon-Carbon, 90 Watt charging, 25 Watt wireless charging, 5 Watt wired reverse charging

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.8, phase shift AF, OIS, LED flash, Videos @2160p/60fps (camera 1), 8.0MP, f/2.2, contrast AF, wide angle (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, USB cable, SIM tool, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, IP68/IP69 certified, MIL-STD-810H certified, fanless, waterproof

Weight

221 g

Price

799 Euro

Links

Motorola homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

保护壳 – 防水 Motorola 手机

Edge 70 Max 的机身采用航空制造中也会使用的铝材。机身质感非常高档且坚固，设计巧妙融合了圆润边缘与平整表面。

Edge 70 Max 提供三种 Pantone 配色：中灰色的 Aqua Gray、极浅蓝色的 Ice Melt，以及我们评测机所采用的深灰色 Dark Shadow。三种配色都非常优雅。相机模组与机身明显区分开来，材质上也有所不同。

机身通过了 IP68 和 IP69 认证，因此只要潜水深度不过深，也可以在水下使用一段时间。灰尘同样不会对这款手机构成问题。

尺寸对比

Motorola Edge 70 Max Motorola Edge 70 Pro Xiaomi 17T Samsung Galaxy S26+ Apple iPhone 17 DIN A6 ❌

功能 – Edge 70 Max 的存储空间有限

在欧洲，唯一可选的内存配置是 8 GB RAM 和 256 GB 存储空间；其他国家也有配备 12 GB RAM 的机型。

在这个价位，Motorola 完全可以提供更大的存储空间，尤其是考虑到它不支持插入 microSD 卡。不过，经常使用云服务的用户可能并不介意。

此外，你得到的也只是一个速度相对较慢的 USB 2.0 接口，无法通过线缆向显示器输出视频，只能通过 Miracast 以无线方式实现。

软件 – Motorola，更新情况尚不确定

这款手机预装了 Android 16。Motorola 一向很少改动 Google 的操作系统，而是通过独立应用提供自有功能。

安全补丁是该厂商长期以来表现欠佳的另一个方面。这款设备也引发了一些争议：Motorola 最初表示，只会提供三年的安全补丁。Motorola 官方网站上至今仍是这样写的。

不过，该公司如今在回复询问时表示，最终将提供五年的更新和三次 Android 大版本升级。这仍远谈不上创纪录，但至少能在一段时间内提供安全保障。

可持续性

Motorola 报告称，整个生命周期的二氧化碳当量排放量为 34.05 千克，其中超过 90% 来自生产环节。

此外，还有一项与 iFixit 合作开展的自行维修计划。

通信与 GNSS – Edge 70 Max 提供高速互联网连接

得益于最新的 WiFi 7 和多根天线，速度可超过 2,000 MBit/s。在我们使用 Asus RT-BE96U 参考路由器进行的测试中，这款手机的表现与其他旗舰手机不相上下。

全面支持 4G 和 5G 频段，可在全球各地接入移动网络。在测试期间的抽查中，即使在信号接收条件较差的地点，接收表现也很不错。

Networking
Motorola Edge 70 Max 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1710 (min: 1285) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1937 (min: 1676) MBit/s ∼83%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1334 (min: 1197) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1634 (min: 1541) MBit/s ∼70%
Xiaomi 17T Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1678 (min: 210) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1871 (min: 1625) MBit/s ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	887 (min: 479) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	914 (min: 876) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1799 (min: 955) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1645 (min: 1513) MBit/s ∼99%
Apple iPhone 17 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	777 (min: 620) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1592 (min: 1420) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1020 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1658 (min: 1579) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1040 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1289 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1507 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2037 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	2321 (min: 396) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	662 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	696 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1238 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1402 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1618 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U	1767 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼76%

Motorola Edge 70 Max; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21: Ø1710 (1285-1879) MBit/s

Motorola Edge 70 Max; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21: Ø1937 (1676-2053) MBit/s

在户外，这款智能手机可以快速定位，精度最高可达 3 米。不支持 SBAS 系统。

在我们的骑行测试中，定位精度良好，但偶尔会与实际路线偏离几米。不过，Edge 70 Max 的定位精度足以满足日常导航需求。

电话功能和通话音质 – 支持 eSIM 的 Motorola 手机

除了两张 nano-SIM 卡外，还可以存储一个 eSIM 配置文件。

我们对测试通话中的语音质量感到满意，对方也确认，即使背景噪音稍大，也能清楚地听到我们的声音。

相机 – Motorola 拍照表现出色的手机

Edge 70 Max 没有配备支持光学或混合变焦的摄像头，但它拥有一颗采用 Sony Lytia 710 传感器的 5000 万像素主摄。在日光下拍出的照片非常清晰，曝光也很到位。在这方面，我们的评测机足以媲美价格高得多的手机。

即使在弱光和高反差场景下，图像也具有良好的动态范围和较高的清晰度。

视频最高支持以 60 fps 录制 4K 画面。慢动作视频在 FullHD 分辨率下最高可达 240 fps。视频画面清晰，录音效果也尚可。

广角摄像头拍出的色彩鲜艳，但细节呈现较为粗糙。

正面的自拍摄像头也能拍出相当清晰的照片，不过在明亮背景下，物体边缘会显得略不自然。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Plant Surrounding Low Light Ultra wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件与保修 – Edge 70 享有 2 年保修

包装内含一根 USB-C 线缆、一个 SIM 卡取卡针和一个保护壳。

制造商为在欧洲购买的设备提供 24 个月的保修。

输入设备与操作 – 快速指纹传感器

触摸屏每秒最多检测 360 次触控输入。这让 Edge 70 Max 的使用体验非常流畅，而得益于屏幕高达 144 Hz 的刷新率，其响应也非常迅速。

指纹传感器隐藏在屏幕后方，位置靠近机身底部，完成初始设置后，手机解锁快速且可靠。

此外，还支持通过前置摄像头进行 2D 人脸识别。

显示屏 – Moto 手机上的 AMOLED 屏幕亮度极高

屏幕亮度非常高：在显示全屏白色图像且环境光传感器受到光照时，亮度超过 1,300 尼特，与大多数竞争对手处于同一水平。

不过，“自然”模式下的整体色彩还原表现稍显逊色，尤其是白色色调偏离了参考值。其他颜色的还原效果良好，肉眼几乎无法分辨其与参考值的差异。

您还应注意 167 Hz 的 PWM 频闪。可以在设置中启用防频闪功能。无论如何，如果您过去曾因屏幕频闪而感到不适，建议在购买前先测试屏幕。


1299 cd/m²	1283 cd/m²	1255 cd/m²
1309 cd/m²	1345 cd/m²	1340 cd/m²
1322 cd/m²	1299 cd/m²	1254 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1345 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1300.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1345 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.74 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.68}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.93}
104.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.187
CCT: 6512 K

	Motorola Edge 70 Max AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Motorola Edge 70 Pro AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8"	Xiaomi 17T OLED, 2756x1268, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy S26+ LTPO-AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Apple iPhone 17 OLED, 2622x1206, 6.3"
Display		-5%	1%	-19%
APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	3411	3326 -2%	3512 3%	2751 -19%
HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²)	3526	3244 -8%	3439 -2%	2875 -18%
Response Times		-35%	-19%	-112%	-81%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)	1 ?(0.5, 0.5)	1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8) -60%	1.17 ?(0.566, 0.603) -17%	3.79 ?(2.137, 1.648) -279%	3.1 ?(0.1, 3) -210%
Response Time Black / White * (ms)	0.8 ?(0.4, 0.4)	1 ?(0.5, 0.5) -25%	1.09 ?(0.539, 0.5555) -36%	1.18 ?(0.6195, 0.561) -48%	1 ?(0.5, 0.5) -25%
PWM Frequency (Hz)	167	144	120	240	241
PWM Amplitude * (%)	14	17 -21%	14.74 -5%	15.27 -9%	15 -7%
Screen		36%	21%	-5%	14%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1345	1684 25%	1104 -18%	1384 3%	1138 -15%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1301	1626 25%	1102 -15%	1379 6%	1127 -13%
Brightness Distribution (%)	93	94 1%	97 4%	95 2%	96 3%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.74	0.88 49%	0.9 48%	2.8 -61%	1.07 39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.27	1.89 56%	2 53%	4.5 -5%	2.99 30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	1.2 59%	1.4 52%	2.2 24%	1.8 38%
Gamma	2.187 ^101%	2.145 ^103%	2.25 ^98%	2.05 ^107%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6512 ^100%	6469 ^100%	6480 ^100%	6514 ^100%	6516 ^100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / 9%	1% / 6%	-45% / -37%	-34% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

167 Hz
Amplitude: 14 %

The display backlight flickers at 167 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 167 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7575 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的一系列测量结果（最低亮度下的振幅曲线可能看起来很平坦，但这是由坐标缩放造成的。插图显示了最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4 ms rise
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5 ms rise
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms).

性能 – 性能强劲的手机

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 已不再是 Qualcomm 的顶级 SoC，但它基于同一款芯片，只是时钟频率更低、缓存更小。它也能很好地胜任高负载任务。

Edge 70 Max 在部分基准测试中略逊于当前的高端手机，但在日常使用中始终运行流畅。

Geekbench 7.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (514 - 4055, n=43, last 2 years)	1588 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	1354 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1)	1354 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	6771 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1)	6771 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1368 - 11622, n=43, last 2 years)	5574 Points -18%

Geekbench 6.7
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	3732 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	3209 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (2609 - 3027, n=7)	2855 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	2803 Points
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 4733, n=184, last 2 years)	1880 Points -33%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1744 Points -38%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1675 Points -40%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	11034 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (8915 - 10438, n=7)	9481 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	9456 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	8963 Points
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	6642 Points -26%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	6569 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 12854, n=184, last 2 years)	5712 Points -36%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (19736 - 24396, n=3)	21478 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	20303 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	19076 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	16845 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=127, last 2 years)	15043 Points -26%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	14387 Points -29%

Antutu v11 - Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	3190793 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (3047878 - 3282461, n=3)	3138024 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	3047878 Points
Average of class Smartphone (519159 - 4450644, n=47, last 2 years)	2427287 Points -20%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	Points -100%

CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2098 Points +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (1275 - 2129, n=5)	1596 Points +25%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	1275 Points
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=106, last 2 years)	1230 Points -4%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1189 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1041 Points -18%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	11422 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (9311 - 10533, n=2)	9922 Points +7%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9674 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	9311 Points
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9265 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=112, last 2 years)	7930 Points -15%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (12313 - 15456, n=2)	13885 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	12733 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	12313 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=112, last 2 years)	11503 Points -7%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	11201 Points -9%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	10954 Points -11%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	13372 Points +34%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	11832 Points +18%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	10455 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (9996 - 10713, n=2)	10355 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	9996 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=112, last 2 years)	9357 Points -6%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	42732 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	40006 Points +9%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	38362 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (36824 - 37773, n=2)	37299 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	36824 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 61797, n=112, last 2 years)	24666 Points -33%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	2321 Points +40%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1845 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (1658 - 1968, n=2)	1813 Points +9%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1782 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=112, last 2 years)	1734 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	1658 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	63650 Points +183%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	42896 Points +91%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	22512 Points
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	22076 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (20683 - 22592, n=3)	21929 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 66164, n=98, last 2 years)	18871 Points -16%

AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35717 Points +2320%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	28680 Points +1843%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=66, last 2 years)	14048 Points +852%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	1998 Points +35%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	1476 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (n=1)	1476 Points 0%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	4677 Points +1011%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1087 Points +158%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	1054 Points +150%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	756 Points +80%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 6997, n=135, last 2 years)	539 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (402 - 673, n=6)	471 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	421 Points
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	35502 Points +8888%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	7557 Points +1813%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	6756 Points +1610%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 55067, n=135, last 2 years)	1756 Points +345%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	767 Points +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (366 - 675, n=6)	462 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	395 Points
Quantized NPU 1.7
Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19, A19 GPU, 8192	48896 Points +5488%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	9585 Points +995%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	8823 Points +908%
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 71367, n=135, last 2 years)	2663 Points +204%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	1621 Points +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (767 - 1578, n=6)	1066 Points +22%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	875 Points

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (17341 - 17728, n=3)	17530 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, Adreno 829, 8192	17341 Points
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=78, last 2 years)	6287 Points -64%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	4913 Points -72%
Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500, Mali-G720 MP8, 12288	4733 Points -73%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600, Xclipse 960, 12288	Points -100%

玩游戏时，你需要做出一些小小的妥协，但在极高的 4K 分辨率下，仍然可以期待相当流畅的 30 fps 表现。因此，不追求极致性能的游戏爱好者应该会觉得物有所值。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7232 Points +49%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	4904 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4869 Points
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4061 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3857 Points -21%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7206 Points +35%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5335 Points
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	5022 Points -6%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4087 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4011 Points -25%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26896 Points +28%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	21785 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	21073 Points
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13946 Points -34%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	13897 Points -34%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13785 Points +53%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10197 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8993 Points
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6772 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	716 Points -92%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13696 Points +49%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	10389 Points +13%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9217 Points
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6721 Points -27%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	729 Points -92%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3212 Points +59%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2124 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2016 Points
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1609 Points -20%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1451 Points -28%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3265 Points +65%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	2197 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1979 Points
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1624 Points -18%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1467 Points -26%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	689 fps +37%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	653 fps +30%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	534.3 fps +6%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	503 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	439 fps +39%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	338.5 fps +7%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	316 fps
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	245 fps -22%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +28%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	120 fps +28%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	94 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	344 fps +62%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	230 fps +8%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	225 fps +6%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	212 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +85%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	92 fps +42%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	92 fps +42%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	65 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -8%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps +57%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	164.8 fps +17%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	141 fps
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	128 fps -9%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	118 fps -16%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps +66%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	75 fps +17%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	64 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -6%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +61%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	74 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	69.8 fps -6%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	69 fps -7%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +25%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	111 fps +16%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	96 fps
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	60 fps -37%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	313 fps +83%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	202.5 fps +18%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	187 fps +9%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	171 fps

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps +65%
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	34 fps
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	31 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	29.6 fps -13%

Jetstream 2
2.0 Total
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	335.933 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	281.459 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (180.6 - 322, n=4)	256 Points +17%
Motorola Edge 70 Max (Chrome 155)	217.933 Points
Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=115, last 2 years)	154.7 Points -29%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	128.808 Points -41%
2.2 Total
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	467.799 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	354.246 Points +51%
Motorola Edge 70 Max (Chrome 155)	235.079 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (165.4 - 338, n=5)	235 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=105, last 2 years)	204 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	165.372 Points -30%
Xiaomi 17T (Chrome 150)	155.45 Points -34%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	599 runs/min +74%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	548 runs/min +59%
Motorola Edge 70 Max (Chrome 155)	344 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (321 - 344, n=2)	333 runs/min -3%
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=72, last 2 years)	225 runs/min -35%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	165 runs/min -52%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	39.6 runs/min +88%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	27.1 runs/min +28%
Motorola Edge 70 Max (Chrome 155)	21.1 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (19.2 - 21.1, n=2)	20.2 runs/min -4%
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 56.5, n=81, last 2 years)	14.6 runs/min -31%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	10.5 runs/min -50%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	290 Points +82%
Motorola Edge 70 Max (Chrome 155)	159 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (153 - 159, n=2)	156 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 278, n=89, last 2 years)	132.8 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	113 Points -29%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	110696 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	85043 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (39707 - 90273, n=3)	63097 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 70 Max (Chrome 155)	59311 Points
Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 160221, n=130, last 2 years)	51365 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	45632 Points -23%
Xiaomi 17T (Chrome 150)	39454 Points -33%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Edge 70 Pro (Chrome 150)	958.8 ms * -35%
Xiaomi 17T (Chrome 150)	921.7 ms * -30%
Average of class Smartphone (216 - 2718, n=119, last 2 years)	860 ms * -21%
Motorola Edge 70 Max (Chrome 155)	708.1 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (371 - 817, n=4)	612 ms * +14%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ (Chrome 146)	387.8 ms * +45%
Apple iPhone 17 (Safari Mobile 26)	263.1 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.1 存储让 Edge 70 Max 的数据传输更快，加载时间更短。

	Motorola Edge 70 Max	Motorola Edge 70 Pro	Xiaomi 17T	Samsung Galaxy S26+	Average 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-23%	-36%	-35%	-14%	-43%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3978.6	3765.9 -5%	3178.43 -20%	3574.74 -10%	3445 ?(1991 - 4088, n=12) -13%	2286 ?(270 - 4370, n=175, last 2 years) -43%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3546.6	3745.6 6%	3639.03 3%	2543.31 -28%	3140 ?(1902 - 3756, n=12) -11%	1987 ?(152.2 - 4113, n=175, last 2 years) -44%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	526.5	399.6 -24%	311.98 -41%	419.84 -20%	428 ?(286 - 580, n=12) -19%	320 ?(47.6 - 614, n=175, last 2 years) -39%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	677.5	206.8 -69%	98.65 -85%	122.63 -82%	593 ?(307 - 871, n=12) -12%	367 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=175, last 2 years) -46%

排放 – Motorola 表面温度较高

温度

在室温下，满载时的最高温度可达 54 °C，非常高，部分位置可能会让人感到不适。在炎热环境中，这确实可能导致手机在玩游戏时过热关机。

另一方面，正如 3DMark 压力测试所示，即使长时间处于高负载状态，手机的性能仍相对稳定。

Max. Load

Idle


53.9 °C	52.5 °C	48.6 °C
54 °C	53.1 °C	49 °C
54 °C	48.3 °C	46.4 °C

Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 51.1 °C


47.1 °C	48.2 °C	51.3 °C
46.8 °C	48.2 °C	51.1 °C
47.1 °C	49.2 °C	53.7 °C

Maximum: 53.7 °C
Average: 49.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.7 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(-) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	96.8 %
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	65.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60.7 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	90.5 %
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % -28%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	62 % -31%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.6 % -34%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	48.9 % -46%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	72.7 %
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	66.1 % -9%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	62.3 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60.6 % -17%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	43.9 % -40%
Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	84.1 %
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61.9 % -26%
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	59.7 % -29%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	75.7 %
Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe	65.4 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63.6 % -16%
Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	61.2 % -19%
Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	42.8 % -43%

Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø22.9 (22.3-24.6) %

Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø14.3 (11.7-24) %

Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø18.5 (15.6-25.2) %

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.2 (25.6-42.9) %

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.8 (18.6-28.5) %

Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø57.6 (51.8-78.8) %

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø110.7 (95.2-156.9) %

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø59.6 (58.1-60) %

Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø23.1 (20.4-28) %

Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø16.6 (10.5-23.8) %

Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø18.7 (14.3-23) %

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø34.5 (28.6-47.1) %

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.5 (21.5-32.6) %

Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.64 (5.3-6.3) %

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 1.0.3.6: Ø10.7 (9.12-14.7) %

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Extreme Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.57 (7.2-12.1) %

Motorola Edge 70 Max Adreno 829, SD 8 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14 (11.6-15.4) %

Motorola Edge 70 Pro Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø6.93 (4.82-11.3) %

Xiaomi 17T Mali-G720 MP8, Dimensity 8500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø8.99 (6.58-10.8) %

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xclipse 960, Exynos 2600, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø17.3 (15-23.7) %

Apple iPhone 17 A19 GPU, A19, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.1 (10.3-15.7) %

扬声器

底部边缘的小扬声器与听筒配合，在横向握持手机时可带来轻微的立体声效果。扬声器的音量足够大，音质相当不错，高音也不会过于突出。

不过，真正重视音质的用户可能更愿意通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接耳机或音箱。无线连接支持多种编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Edge 70 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

Samsung Galaxy S26+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%

电池续航 – 续航出色的Motorola手机

能量摄入

Motorola Edge 70 Max 在我们的测试中表现出中等水平的功耗。

这款手机最高支持 90 瓦充电。尽管电池容量很大，但充满电仅需略多于两小时。这款手机支持 Qi2 标准无线充电，但最高充电功率仅为 25 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	1 / 1.5 / 1.9 Watt
Load	8.4 / 12.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Edge 70 Max 7100 mAh	Motorola Edge 70 Pro 6500 mAh	Xiaomi 17T 6500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26+ 4900 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-13%	-1%	2%	8%	-36%	12%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	1	1.4 -40%	1.25 -25%	0.56 44%	1.1 -10%	1.608 ?(0.8 - 3.53, n=4) -61%	0.904 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=137, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.5	1.6 -7%	1.88 -25%	1.28 15%	1.3 13%	2.22 ?(1.3 - 4.77, n=4) -48%	1.479 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=137, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.9	1.9 -0%	1.99 -5%	1.31 31%	1.5 21%	2.54 ?(1.7 - 4.86, n=4) -34%	1.679 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=137, last 2 years) 12%
Load Average * (Watt)	8.4	9.7 -15%	5.77 31%	12.38 -47%	7.6 10%	10.5 ?(8.4 - 11.8, n=3) -25%	6.68 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=89, last 2 years) 20%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	12.7	13.2 -4%	10.02 21%	16.9 -33%	12 6%	14.4 ?(11.7 - 18.7, n=3) -13%	10.6 ?(4.75 - 22, n=89, last 2 years) 17%

* ... smaller is better

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Edge 70 Max; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.62 (0.765-8.34) Watt

Motorola Edge 70 Max; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.294 (1.07-2.31) Watt

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Edge 70 Max; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.5 (10.1-12.74) Watt

Motorola Edge 70 Max; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.294 (1.07-2.31) Watt

电池续航时间

Edge 70 Max 配备了 7,100 mAh 大容量电池，只有少数几款手机的电池容量比它更大。其续航表现也相应地非常出色：在我们的真实场景 Wi-Fi 测试中，Edge 70 Max 连续运行了近 28 小时。

只要避免执行负载过高的任务，这样的续航应该足以轻松支撑两个工作日甚至更久。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		27h 57min

	Motorola Edge 70 Max 7100 mAh	Motorola Edge 70 Pro 6500 mAh	Xiaomi 17T 6500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S26+ 4900 mAh	Apple iPhone 17 3692 mAh
Battery runtime		-23%	-25%	-36%	-28%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	28	21.6 -23%	21.1 -25%	17.8 -36%	20.1 -28%
Reader / Idle (h)		36.2			66.7
Load (h)		5			4.4
H.264 (h)					29.4

Notebookcheck 综合评分

凭借 Motorola Edge 70 Max，这家制造商推出了一款完全能与顶级设备一较高下的手机。

不过，其极低的价格意味着需要在内存容量和相机方面做出妥协。

Motorola Edge 70 Max 评测。评测机由 Motorola Deutschland 提供。

Back to the verdict

Motorola Edge 70 Max - 10/21/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

68 / 75 → 91%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

58 / 69 → 84%

Weight

88 / 50-100 → 75%

Battery

95%

Display

91%

Games Performance

48 / 55 → 86%

Application Performance

78 / 85 → 91%

AI Performance

27%

Temperature

66%

Noise

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

77%

Average

72%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
92.8%

Materials
25%

Packaging
90%

Power Use
95.7%

Repairability
18%

Software Updates
70%

Total Sustainability Score: 65.3%

可能的替代方案对比

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 86.2%	Motorola Edge 70 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 829 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 799€	221 g	256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.82" 3168x1440 510 PPI AMOLED
2. 83.2%	Motorola Edge 70 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: $564.50 List Price: 800€	183 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED
3. 83.7%	Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 750€	200 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6.59" 2756x1268 460 PPI OLED
4. 89%	Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 960 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	List Price: 1249€	190 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI LTPO-AMOLED
5. 87.9%	Apple iPhone 17 Apple A19 ⎘ Apple A19 GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe	List Price: 949 Euro	177 g	256 GB NVMe	6.30" 2622x1206 460 PPI OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Motorola Edge 70 Max 智能手机评测 – 创纪录的续航表现与旗舰级功能，价格亲民

全面拥抱电池动力。

Motorola Edge 70 Max 评测结论

Pros

Cons

价格和供货情况

Table of Contents

规格

保护壳 – 防水 Motorola 手机

尺寸对比

功能 – Edge 70 Max 的存储空间有限

软件 – Motorola，更新情况尚不确定

可持续性

通信与 GNSS – Edge 70 Max 提供高速互联网连接

电话功能和通话音质 – 支持 eSIM 的 Motorola 手机

相机 – Motorola 拍照表现出色的手机

配件与保修 – Edge 70 享有 2 年保修

输入设备与操作 – 快速指纹传感器

显示屏 – Moto 手机上的 AMOLED 屏幕亮度极高

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 – 性能强劲的手机

排放 – Motorola 表面温度较高

温度

3DMark 压力测试

扬声器

Motorola Edge 70 Max audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S26+ audio analysis

电池续航 – 续航出色的Motorola手机

能量摄入

功耗：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池续航时间

Notebookcheck 综合评分

可能的替代方案对比

Transparency

More articles related to this device

Related Articles