Motorola Edge 70 Plus 评测结论
Motorola Edge 70 Plus 的配置明显不如标准版 Edge 70，但定价也更低。
作为回报，你会得到一块在需要时亮度很高、色彩还原出色且 PWM 频率较高的屏幕，让对屏幕较敏感的用户也更有机会舒适地使用它。做工也很出色，不过与更贵的机型相比，仍能察觉到一些细微的妥协，例如缺少防浸水保护。
主摄拍出的照片效果不错，但它在机身背面相对孤立，因此变焦能力有限。
大容量电池无疑是一大亮点。它带来了出色的续航表现，而 Edge 70 Plus 在这方面确实明显优于 Edge 70。
600 欧元价位的竞争十分激烈：Oppo 或 Samsung 推出的高品质中端智能手机，有时性能强劲得多，或配备更加灵活的相机系统。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
测试时，这款智能手机仅在欧洲和中东地区有售，售价约为680美元。
- $289.50Motorola Moto Edge 70 Fusion 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB+8GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.8" Curved XT2605-3 Latino American Version (Pantone Silhouette (Blue))
- $549.50Motorola Moto Edge 70 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB+12GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.67" Curved XT2601-3 Latino American Version (Gadget Gray)
- $559.50Motorola Moto Edge 70 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB+12GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.67" Curved XT2601-3 Latino American Version (Bronze Green)
规格
机身与功能 – Motorola 手机采用醋酸纤维饰面
Motorola 的这款中端智能手机背面采用醋酸纤维质感饰面。和该制造商的产品经常出现的情况一样，它提供三种不同的 Pantone 颜色：Mountain View、Grey Lilac 和 Milky Blue，也就是深绿色、珠光色和浅蓝色。宣传图片中还可以看到浅绿色款，但目前尚未上市，至少在欧洲如此。
光滑的饰面看起来很显档次，Edge 70 Plus 的做工也很扎实。不过，扭转机身时，我们能听到明显的吱嘎声。背部边缘采用圆弧设计，因此 Edge 70 Plus 的手感与该系列棱角更分明的其他机型大不相同。
目前这款手机仅提供 256 GB 存储空间和 8 GB RAM 的版本。不过，厂商也在生产 128 GB 版本。它配有 microSD 卡读卡器，可用于扩展存储空间。在我们的测试中，它的表现还算不错。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信与操作 – 中端机型，配备指纹传感器
内置 Wi-Fi 6，这是速度最快的 Wi-Fi 标准；在我们使用 Asus RT-BE96U 参考路由器进行的测试中，Motorola 手机的速度最高可达 532 Mbps。同价位的其他手机速度可能快得多，但这些速度通常足以满足日常使用需求。
移动网络方面支持多种 4G 和 5G 频段，因此旅行时也可以使用这款智能手机。在我们的测试中进行的抽查显示，即使在网络覆盖较差的地方，信号接收情况也不错。
触摸屏易于操作，不过屏幕边角是圆角，是否喜欢这种设计则因人而异。
指纹传感器集成在显示屏中，完成一次录入后，就能快速、可靠地解锁手机。它也支持面部解锁，但仅采用 2D 方式。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor 600 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
软件与可持续发展——摩托罗拉承诺持续更新至2031年
Motorola 预装了 Android 16，测试时的安全补丁为 2026 年 8 月版，因此目前已不完全是最新版本。制造商承诺提供 5 年安全补丁，即支持至 2031 年，并提供 3 次操作系统更新。
关于可持续性的信息不多，但至少包装不含塑料。
摄像头 – 只有一个摄像头
说到摄像头，Motorola Edge 70 Plus 采用了不同的方案：制造商没有着重配备强大的变焦镜头和广角摄像头，而是完全依赖主摄像头，并且只搭配了一颗分辨率很低的微距摄像头。
不过，主摄像头的分辨率高达 2 亿像素，实际拍出的照片效果不错，细节丰富。该传感器在弱光环境下也表现出色。
前置摄像头拍出的自拍效果很好，不过在特别明亮的区域往往会出现过曝。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingLow Light
显示屏 – 配备出色 AMOLED 显示屏的 Motorola 手机
Edge 70 Plus 配备一块亮度非常高的 AMOLED 屏幕，在日常使用中，最高亮度通常可达约 1,400 cd/m²；显示小面积内容和 HDR 内容时，亮度则可超过 4,000 cd/m²。至少在选择“Natural”色彩配置时，其色彩还原表现出色，与理想值的偏差极小。
PWM 闪烁频率高达 361 Hz；不过，对此敏感的用户在购买前应先试用屏幕，例如前往电子产品商店体验。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 1414 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.24 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
103.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.129
CCT: 6517 K
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | Sony Xperia 10 VIII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1" | Oppo Reno16 FS AMOLED, 2372x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A57 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Honor 600 AMOLED, 2728x1264, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -65% | -68% | -54% | 35% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 4226 | 1487 -65% | 1306 -69% | 1920 -55% | 3102 -27% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 4152 | 1470 -65% | 1359 -67% | 1980 -52% | 8192 97% |
| Response Times | 1% | -41% | -19% | -4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.2 ? | 0.93 ? 22% | 1.7 ? -42% | 1.21 ? -1% | 1.06 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.8 ? | 0.93 ? -16% | 1.4 ? -75% | 1.1 ? -38% | 1 ? -25% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 361 | 480 | 92 | 240 | 60 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 14 | 14.46 -3% | 15 -7% | 16.72 -19% | 13.86 1% |
| Screen | -12% | -101% | -11% | -62% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1414 | 1522 8% | 1143 -19% | 1135 -20% | 1787 26% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.24 | 1.4 -13% | 3.27 -164% | 1.7 -37% | 1.9 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.29 | 2.9 -27% | 6.49 -183% | 2.5 -9% | 5.3 -131% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.1 -17% | 2.5 -39% | 1.4 22% | 3.4 -89% |
| Gamma | 2.129 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.274 97% | 2.08 106% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6517 100% | 6832 95% | 6850 95% | 6578 99% | 6874 95% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1527 | 1134 | |||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 99 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-20% | -70% /
-74% | -28% /
-23% | -10% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 361 Hz Amplitude: 14 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 361 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 361 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7614 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下的测量序列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线可能看起来很平，这是由于缩放比例所致。信息框显示了最低亮度下振幅的放大版本。）
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航——凭借出色的电池续航表现，值得推荐购买
SoC（Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3）的性能略低于这一价位应有的水平。只要不运行要求过高的应用或同时处理多项任务，通常都能流畅运行。它还有一定的性能余量，但要求非常高的应用会让这款智能手机应接不暇。
长时间高负载使用后，机身表面会明显发热。好在这不会影响 SoC 的性能，3DMark 压力测试也证实了这一点。
立体声扬声器音质不错，音量也足以充满一间中等大小的房间。通过耳机或外接扬声器可以获得更好的音质，这些设备可通过 USB 或蓝牙连接。这款手机支持多种蓝牙音频编解码器。
这款手机还配备了 6,500 毫安时电池，续航表现出色，远胜 Edge 70：在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间为 23 小时 42 分钟，足以满足两天的日常使用需求。这款手机支持最高 45 瓦充电，电池充满电最多需要 2 小时。还可以通过线缆使用手机电池为外接设备供电，功率最高可达 7.5 瓦。
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus | Sony Xperia 10 VIII | Oppo Reno16 FS | Samsung Galaxy A57 | Honor 600 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | -8% | -39% | -1% | -23% | -3% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2048.02 | 1914.56 -7% | 1902.3 -7% | 1683.07 -18% | 1986.99 -3% | 1773 ? -13% | 2279 ? 11% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1844.13 | 1802.32 -2% | 1795.4 -3% | 1119.11 -39% | 1807.77 -2% | 1241 ? -33% | 1971 ? 7% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 364.54 | 320.27 -12% | 306 -16% | 249.83 -31% | 353.95 -3% | 290 ? -20% | 317 ? -13% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 434.49 | 386.88 -11% | 402.6 -7% | 149.04 -66% | 451 4% | 320 ? -26% | 363 ? -16% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | |
Motorola Edge 70 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Samsung Galaxy A57 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  0.9 / 1.6 / 2.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus 6500 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 VIII 5000 mAh | Oppo Reno16 FS 6500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh | Honor 600 6400 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -23% | 16% | 1% | -30% | -10% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.9 | 0.81 10% | 0.9 -0% | 0.71 21% | 1.24 -38% | 1.245 ? -38% | 0.901 ? -0% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.6 | 2.51 -57% | 1.2 25% | 1.94 -21% | 2.28 -42% | 1.659 ? -4% | 1.483 ? 7% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.1 | 2.57 -22% | 1.6 24% | 2.04 3% | 2.3 -10% | 1.861 ? 11% | 1.677 ? 20% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 4.37 | 6.19 | 4.43 ? | 6.82 ? | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 10.16 | 13.67 | 7.57 ? | 10.8 ? |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus 6500 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 VIII 5000 mAh | Oppo Reno16 FS 6500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh | Honor 600 6400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -16% | -1% | -37% | -5% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 23.7 | 19.8 -16% | 23.4 -1% | 14.9 -37% | 22.6 -5% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 40.1 | 39.8 | |||
| Load (h) | 5.1 | 3.6 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 26.8 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
Motorola Edge 70 Plus 主要凭借续航令人印象深刻。
除此之外，它在配置方面往往有所欠缺，例如处理器和摄像头方面。
Motorola Edge 70 Plus
- 10/01/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代方案对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 77.8%  | Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 599€ | 159 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
2. 78.5%  | Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 599€ | 168 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" 2340x1080 422 PPI OLED |
3. 76%  | Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 649€ | 196 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" 2372x1080 397 PPI AMOLED |
4. 81.5%  | Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 550 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 589€ | 179 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
5. 82.8%  | Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: $729.00 List Price: 650€ | 185 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" 2728x1264 458 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
