小米17T评测
小米T系列最值得信赖的优势之一，就是上市后价格迅速下跌。小米17T正是受益于此：上市不久，在德国的售价已降至500欧元以下，尽管存在一些不足，但其整体表现依然出色。
将屏幕尺寸缩小至6.59英寸，在日常使用中确实带来了显著的人体工学优势。但令人印象深刻的不仅仅是OLED面板的尺寸。我们测得的高亮度确保了出色的可读性，而高频PWM和直流调光技术则更适合敏感的眼睛。
相机配置虽未实现重大飞跃，但全新的长焦镜头弥补了前代机型未能做到的差距，缩小了与高端机型之间的差距。就中端机型而言，变焦照片清晰锐利、细节丰富，加之出色的徕卡主摄像头，这使得小米17T成为摄影爱好者不容小觑的强劲竞争者。
然而，材质的选择在某种程度上削弱了这款手机追求高端定位的野心。 缺乏无线充电和Wi-Fi 7功能在高端机型中显得格格不入，考虑到其目标上市价格约为750欧元，这一点也令人难以理解。与此同时，小米在中高端机型中仍坚持使用USB 2.0接口，这一现象正变得越来越难以忽视。
Pros
Cons
- $829.50XIAOMI 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC Global ROM Unlocked 50MP Triple Pro Leica Cam eSIM 6.83" 144Mhz Model 2602EPTC0G Liberado (Black)
- $599.00XIAOMI 17T Ai 5G (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC Global ROM Unlocked 50MP Triple Pro Leica Cam eSIM 6.59" 144Mhz Model 2602DPT53G Liberado (Opal White.)
- $829.50XIAOMI 17T PRO Ai 5G (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB + 12GB) NFC Global ROM Unlocked 50MP Triple Pro Leica Cam eSIM 6.83" 144Mhz Model 2506BPN68G Liberado (Deep Blue)
Table of Contents
- 小米17T评测
- 小米17T规格参数
- 机身：这款防水安卓手机比其旗舰级竞争对手更为紧凑
- 特点：小米17T不支持USB 3.1和视频输出
- 软件：一款可获得六年系统更新的中端手机
- 通信与GNSS：不支持Wi-Fi 7的5G智能手机
- 电话通信与通话质量：支持双卡和eSIM的小米智能手机
- 相机：徕卡助力中端手机拍出卓越照片
- 配件与保修：不附带电源适配器的安卓手机
- 输入设备与操作：与旗舰竞品相比，小米17T仅配备了光学指纹传感器
- 显示屏：小米采用带PWM和直流调光的OLED屏幕
- 性能：这款中端手机采用联发科处理器，而非骁龙处理器
- 性能表现：小米17T在高负载下会出现降频
- 电池续航：小米17T Pro的更紧凑替代机型，不支持无线充电
- Notebookcheck对小米17T的综合评分
- 小米17T的替代机型一览
小米17T规格参数
机身：这款防水安卓手机比其旗舰级竞争对手更为紧凑
特点：小米17T不支持USB 3.1和视频输出
除了 USB 接口外，这款小米手机还具备非常丰富的功能。其中包括红外发射器、USB OTG、蓝牙 6.0、指南针和 NFC。不过，它不支持高速 USB 连接，也不支持有线视频输出。
在与三星 T7 便携式固态硬盘的测试中，我们使用 USB 2.0 接口测得的传输速率仅为 28 MB/s。
软件：一款可获得六年系统更新的中端手机
在我们的评测期间，小米17T运行的是搭载小米自主研发的HyperOS 3界面的Android 16系统。据厂商称，该机型将提供六年的安全更新，而Android版本升级则仅限四年。
可持续发展
小米未提供有关其高端中端机型环境足迹或环保举措的任何信息。在EPREL数据库中，T系列机型被列为可维修性C级。其包装似乎由瓦楞纸板制成。
通信与GNSS：不支持Wi-Fi 7的5G智能手机
得益于 Wi-Fi 6E 技术，小米 17T 提供的网速足以满足日常使用需求。不过，在这个价位段，我们原本期望它能支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准——正如我们对 Pro 版本的评测所明确展示的那样，该标准在搭配兼容路由器时可提供显著更高的带宽。 尽管如此，小米17T在搭配我们的华硕RT-BE96U参考路由器时，仍能达到近2,000 Mbit/s的峰值传输速度。
在移动场景下，该手机支持最高5G网络连接。 整体频段覆盖非常出色，支持德语市场所需的所有频段，包括用于4G的频段。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Honor 600 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
为了评估实际定位精度，我们记录了一条骑行路线。作为参考设备的Garmin Venu 2在精度上略胜一筹，尤其是在过弯时，但小米17T的定位依然相当精准。在路线追踪方面，这款中端手机采用了主流的卫星导航系统，且大多处于双频模式。
电话通信与通话质量：支持双卡和eSIM的小米智能手机
这款小米手机支持经典的双卡双待模式，可同时使用两张nano-SIM卡或两张eSIM卡。通话质量良好，声音清晰。
相机：徕卡助力中端手机拍出卓越照片
小米17T搭载了与徕卡联合开发的三摄系统，由三个5000万像素传感器组成，不过其中只有长焦镜头是真正的新增配置。 与15T一样，徕卡主摄采用了1/1.55英寸的Light Fusion 800传感器。尽管尺寸相对较小，但弱光环境下的成像依然相当锐利，不过曝光均匀度还有提升空间。而在日光环境下，小米17T的成像效果给我们留下了深刻印象。 动态范围和锐度在中端机型中都表现得非常出色。
T系列在变焦性能方面实现了重大飞跃。这款具备5倍光学变焦且支持光学防抖的长焦镜头，能够捕捉丰富的细节，同时避免了像Poco F8 Pro等设备上常见的那种人为过度锐化现象。 色彩还原也令人非常满意。
这套摄像头系统中最薄弱的环节依然是超广角镜头。它既不支持光学防抖，也不支持自动对焦。虽然边缘处可见伪影和明显的模糊现象，但以该价位段而言，其成像质量完全可以接受。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow lightUltra-wide angle5x zoom
配件与保修：不附带电源适配器的安卓手机
小米17T随附一条USB-C数据线、一个硅胶保护壳和一个SIM卡取卡针。出厂时还预装了屏幕保护膜。
在德国，保修期仅为12个月。不过，可以通过小米自家的“Care”保险套餐延长保修期，该套餐还提供意外损坏和盗窃的额外保障。其他国家的保修条款可能有所不同。
输入设备与操作：与旗舰竞品相比，小米17T仅配备了光学指纹传感器
该触摸屏的采样率高达 3,200 Hz，因此在日常使用中操作非常精准。内置的 X 轴振动马达也以其清晰的触觉反馈给人留下深刻印象。
在生物识别解锁方面，小米17T采用了光学屏下指纹传感器。在我们的测试中，其运行稳定且快速。此外，还支持通过前置摄像头进行安全性较低的2D人脸识别。
显示屏：小米采用带PWM和直流调光的OLED屏幕
小米特别注重T系列机型显示屏的护眼性能，这一点得到了TÜV莱茵四项认证的印证。尽管这款6.59英寸AMOLED显示屏采用PWM技术控制亮度，但这款中端手机将最高达3,840 Hz的高频PWM调光与直流调光相结合。 通过Rigol软件测试，我们还测得其基础刷新率为120 Hz。
这款未采用LTPO技术的屏幕拥有120 Hz刷新率，以及2,756 × 1,268像素的清晰分辨率。在我们的APL和HDR测量中，其峰值亮度达到了宣传的3,500尼特。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1104 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6480 K
| Xiaomi 17T OLED, 2756x1268, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | Google Pixel 10a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Honor 600 AMOLED, 2728x1264, 6.6" | Xiaomi 15T AMOLED, 2772x1280, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -14% | 63% | -6% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3512 | 3582 2% | 3050 -13% | 3102 -12% | 3310 -6% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 3439 | 3538 3% | 2925 -15% | 8192 138% | 3267 -5% |
| Response Times | 18% | -6% | 8% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.17 ? | 0.8 ? 32% | 1.42 ? -21% | 1.06 ? 9% | 1.2 ? -3% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.09 ? | 0.952 ? 13% | 1.07 ? 2% | 1 ? 8% | 1.28 ? -17% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 120 | 120 | 240 | 60 | 120 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 14.74 | 13.45 9% | 14.71 -0% | 13.86 6% | 17.05 -16% |
| Screen | -11% | 4% | -89% | -42% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1104 | 1107 0% | 2205 100% | 1787 62% | 1070 -3% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1102 | 1110 1% | 1079 -2% | ||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 97 0% | 94 -3% | ||
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1 -11% | 1.4 -56% | 1.9 -111% | 1.5 -67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2 | 2.7 -35% | 2.3 -15% | 5.3 -165% | 3.9 -95% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.7 -21% | 1.6 -14% | 3.4 -143% | 2.5 -79% |
| Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6480 100% | 6498 100% | 6715 97% | 6874 95% | 6648 98% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-1% | -5% /
-4% | -6% /
-23% | -20% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 14.74 % Secondary Frequency: 3846 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7735 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别下，采用不同亮度设置进行的一系列测量（尽管在最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来平坦，但这只是缩放比例造成的。信息框中显示的是最低亮度下振幅的放大图。）
我们使用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测量表明，这款OLED显示屏不仅亮度极高，而且在色彩还原方面经过了非常精确的校准。在sRGB色域内，色彩和灰度的偏差肉眼几乎无法察觉。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.09 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.539 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5555 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.566 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.603 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
性能：这款中端手机采用联发科处理器，而非骁龙处理器
Dimensity 8500 虽未承诺旗舰级性能，但小米 17T 在日常使用中并不显得卡顿。 与中端竞品相比，这款联发科SoC的表现非常出色，尽管市面上也有搭载高端芯片组、主打性能的机型，其价格与小米17T大致相当。例如，Poco X8 Pro Max的运行速度明显更快，尤其是在单核性能方面。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.x | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (14387 - 16845, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=105, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (1041 - 1287, n=3) | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (42896 - 63650, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 78695, n=96, last 2 years) | |
| AI Benchmark - Score V6 | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (4709 - 4913, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
在图形处理方面，小米17T搭载了Mali-G720 MP8图形处理器。这使其在某些测试中表现远优于前代机型。在GFXBench的4K测试中，帧率超过30 fps对于一款中端智能手机而言表现相当出色，对于偶尔玩游戏来说也绰绰有余。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Honor 600 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total | |
| Google Pixel 10a (Chrome 149) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (155.5 - 195.5, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi 17T (Chrome 150) | |
| Honor 600 (Chrome 149) | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 126661, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (39454 - 62098, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Xiaomi 17T (Chrome 150) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi 15T (Chrome 141) | |
| Xiaomi 17T (Chrome 150) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (822 - 959, n=3) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (257 - 2718, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| WebXPRT 5 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (23 - 104, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max (Chrome 147) | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 (36 - 46, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi 17T (Chrome 150) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi 17T | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | Google Pixel 10a | Honor 600 | Xiaomi 15T | Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | 54% | 71% | -27% | 104% | 47% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 3178.43 | 2067.34 -35% | 1689.27 -47% | 1986.99 -37% | 1954.45 -39% | 3632 ? 14% | 2249 ? -29% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 3639.03 | 1942.35 -47% | 826.38 -77% | 1807.77 -50% | 1879.62 -48% | 3225 ? -11% | 1944 ? -47% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 311.98 | 366.17 17% | 326.53 5% | 353.95 13% | 278.9 -11% | 410 ? 31% | 312 ? 0% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 98.65 | 108.21 10% | 430.37 336% | 451 357% | 89.68 -9% | 476 ? 383% | 360 ? 265% |
性能表现：小米17T在高负载下会出现降频
温度
在我们的测量中，表面温度相对较高，尽管小米17T产生的热量并不特别令人担忧。尽管如此，在3DMark压力测试中，天玑8500的性能降频幅度最高达40%。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
发言人
这款小米手机采用双扬声器系统，音质表现尚可，尽管低音和整体音场深度略显不足。我们的粉红噪声测试还显示，中频范围内的频率响应有所提升。
对于通过耳机或外接扬声器输出的音频，小米17T既支持USB接口，也支持通过蓝牙6.0进行无线连接。我们在设置菜单中未找到Auracast选项。值得肯定的是，该手机支持多种蓝牙编解码器。
Xiaomi 17T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi 15T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
电池续航：小米17T Pro的更紧凑替代机型，不支持无线充电
功耗
小米为该手机配备了一块采用碳硅阳极的6,500 mAh电池。该电池可通过HyperCharge以最高67 W的功率充电，或通过PPS标准以50 W的功率充电。在我们的测试中，充满电大约需要45分钟。 用户若需为耳机补充电量，可启用 22.5 W 反向充电功能。不过，小米 17T 不支持无线充电。
根据我们的测量，联发科 SoC 的功耗表现平平，尽管空闲状态下近 2 W 的功耗并不算特别高效。
| Off / Standby |   0.05 / 0.15 Watt |
| Idle |  1.25 / 1.88 / 1.99 Watt |
| Load |
5.77 / 10.02 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi 17T 6500 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max 8500 mAh | Google Pixel 10a 5100 mAh | Honor 600 6400 mAh | Xiaomi 15T 5500 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 8500 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | 47% | -12% | 10% | -1% | 8% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.25 | 1.19 5% | 0.7 44% | 1.24 1% | 0.8 36% | 1.207 ? 3% | 0.88 ? 30% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.88 | 1.23 35% | 0.94 50% | 2.28 -21% | 1.2 36% | 1.557 ? 17% | 1.467 ? 22% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.99 | 1.43 28% | 1.03 48% | 2.3 -16% | 1.26 37% | 1.723 ? 13% | 1.657 ? 17% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 5.77 | 6.8 -18% | 6.8 -18% | 7.15 ? -24% | 6.78 ? -18% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 10.02 | 11.45 -14% | 14.32 -43% | 11.3 ? -13% | 11.2 ? -12% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：Geekbench（150 cd/m²）
功耗：GFXbench（150 cd/m²）
电池续航时间
得益于大容量电池，在将屏幕亮度调整至150 cd/m²的真实使用场景电池测试中，这款小米中端手机展现出了令人印象深刻的续航能力，续航时间约为21小时。
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Xiaomi 17T | |
| Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max | |
| Google Pixel 10a | |
| Honor 600 | |
| Xiaomi 15T | |
Notebookcheck对小米17T的综合评分
得益于价格的快速下跌，小米T系列在中端机型中成为了一个极具竞争力的选择。特别是小米17T，凭借其徕卡相机的成像质量和出色的性能表现，在目前德国市场500欧元以下的价格区间内极具竞争力。
Xiaomi 17T
- 08/06/2026 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Total Sustainability Score: 小米17T的替代机型一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.7%  | Xiaomi 17T MediaTek Dimensity 8500 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP8 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 750€ | 200 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.59" 2756x1268 460 PPI OLED |
2. 85.4%  | Xiaomi Poco X8 Pro Max Mediatek Dimensity 9500s ⎘ ARM Immortalis-G925 MC11 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: $465.00 List Price: 470€ | 218 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
3. 85.3%  | Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 549€ | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED |
4. 82.8%  | Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: List Price: 650€ | 185 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" 2728x1264 458 PPI AMOLED |
5. 84.8%  | Xiaomi 15T MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G720 MP7 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | Amazon: List Price: 650€ | 194 g | 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
